Tag: writing

Categories
Uncategorised

It’s a Wonderful Life (1946)

The one film that is brought up time and time again during Christmas time and globally known as the Christmas film to watch. Following community hero, George Bailey (James Stewart) during his highs and lows in life, we see him in the lowest moment and guardian angel, Clarence (Henry Travers) shows him what Bedford Falls would be like if Bailey was never born. Directed by Frank Capra, it’s a classic tale about the loved ones you have around you and the love you have for them in return. We follow George falling in love with the beautiful Mary (Donna Reed) which is sparked in one of my favourite scenes in film history as they sing “Buffalo Gals” and talk about lassoing the moon. So what is it about this film that makes it so well loved?

For starters, the feel-good nature of the film is perfect for family viewings, especially around Christmas time. Another appeal is the film’s fearlessness in exploring darker themes such as capitalism, the loss of the American Dream and death by suicide. George Bailey isn’t portrayed as more than the ordinary American man. He is a character of high moral character and this makes his fall from grace even harder to stomach. James Stewart is remarkable as Bailey in what has become the definitive Stewart performance. Albeit a bit awkward when portraying a younger Bailey as he looks so much older but he pulls it off because Bailey himself is a man who is older than his years. Bailey hasn’t been blessed with an easy life as he loses his father at a young age and is forced to take over his father’s business instead of travelling but he takes to it and thrives. His wife, Mary (Donna Reed) does well to keep him grounded and motivated. She has her own strength as she is unafraid to stand up for what she believes in. Mary isn’t as straightforward as the audience would believe. She has a complexity about her when she disappoints her mother by marrying George rather than the successful Sam Wainwright (Frank Albertson) or when she has to deal with remaining in Bedford Falls as George gives their Honeymoon funds away to avoid the bank’s closure. There is a lot of pressure on Mary to support both her husband and the family home, especially in the midst of a crisis. Even when George is angry, she refuses to let him get away with it while at the same time remaining composed and compassionate.

iawl.png

Onto the sidekick side of things, Henry Travers captures Clarence’s purity perfectly. From his fascination with the stories of Mark Twain to his inability to mask his angel status, Clarence is a beloved character in film. In a community where George is seen as a guiding light, it is only Clarence that can save him from himself. Clarence is completely sympathetic and importantly empathetic with George’s problems. The audience watches the life of George Bailey through the eyes (literally and figuratively) of Clarence. With every classic hero there has to be a villain. This comes in the form of Mr. Potter (Lionel Barrymore) who owns nearly every business in town as well as a large portion of property, meaning that he owns its residents also. He is a depiction of the greed and capitalism that prevents the American Dream and leaves those who long for it struggling for the rest of their lives. He is a miserable old man with no family and friend and is only surrounded by his employees. Where George sees friends, Potter sees customers.

There is something nostalgic about watching this film. Not simply from watching it a thousand times since I was small, but something distant about the simple way of living in Bedford Falls. At its heart, It’s a Wonderful Life is in itself a simple film but it is only made complex when those who dare to dream almost thrive and are then shot down. The lovely touch of including Clarence, an angel who has yet to earn his wings, brings in a bit of magic while Capra’s clever direction keeps the magic to a minimum in a bid to make the film as real as it can be. In some ways, his vision of Potter is reminiscent of Scrooge in A Christmas Carol before he is visited by ghosts. It’s just as beautiful in black and white as well as colour, it will always leave you in tears of laughter and sadness.

60792-wonderfullife

What It’s a Wonderful Life does so well is its neutrality in portraying the ordinary American life but showing the extraordinary achievements that a community can make together. It’s a film about the importance of family, being loved and loving others. There are many aspects from the film that could be brought through to today such as Potter’s ideals. It could be argued that most people live in Pottersville in this day and age. In a time of great challenge, it is nice to watch a film that shows people overcoming the odds. It’s a film that can never date because its a film about humanity and the chasing of dreams. I would forever argue that this is the best Christmas film because there is no grandeur in it and no attempt to be a big shot and big budget superstar film. It is a humble story of how one man’s life touches that of his family, friends and the community at large. George is a small piece of a much larger puzzle and it is only when he realises his own self-worth that he recognises the ability to pull the community together to stop Potter from destroying the town with greed.

What do you think about It’s a Wonderful Life? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Quentin Tarantino: Film Ranking

If you asked a group of people for their favourite living filmmaker, there is a strong chance that a large percentage of them will say the name: Quentin Tarantino. One of the greatest and most original minds to come out of the film industry in the history of film, Tarantino practically defined 90s cinema with his look into the gangster underworld of Los Angeles. His films are known for their strong use of language, gratuitous violence and the iconic writing style that Tarantino brings to his dialogue. The owner of two Best Original Screenplay Oscars (for Pulp Fiction and Django Unchained), he has yet to win a Best Director gong. With the release of this year’s Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, could this be another successful awards season for Tarantino?

Tarantino had always stated that he intended to make 10 features. Counting Kill Bill as one, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood would be his ninth and, therefore, penultimate picture. I thought it would be a great celebration of his work to revisit his films old and new and see how I would stack them up when compared to each other.

Here are the reviews for the films of Quentin Tarantino:

Reservoir Dogs (1992)

Possibly one of the most (if not the most) iconic debuts ever to be delivered by a filmmaker, Reservoir Dogs follows a group of men who are given colour code names such as Mr. Orange and Mr. Brown and their attempt to carry out a diamond heist. A pretty simple plot but the genius of the film comes from Tarantino’s decision to not show the heist itself. What we are presented with is the run-up to the heist and it’s consequences when it goes wrong. Featuring a brilliant cast including Harvey Keitel, Michael Madsen and Tim Roth. My favourite performance comes from Steve Buscemi who plays the fearfully paranoid Mr. Pink. Among the men, Pink is clearly the outsider from the beginning when he refuses to give the waitress a tip. The script may seem simple but it is anything but. There is a rhythm and style that would come to define a Tarantino feature such as extensive allegories and numerous pop culture references. The soundtrack for this film has also become somewhat of a legend in its own right and has become a reference point for a lot of modern filmmakers. Tarantino himself claims that this film is the closest to being a “perfect” film which although I see the argument for, I would say that he has managed to make even better films. It would be a shame to think that his first film was his best.

Pulp Fiction (1994)

If you had to say one film that defines the 1990s, I think the majority of people would say Pulp Fiction. From the iconic poster design, extreme violence and brilliant dialogue, Pulp Fiction catapulted Tarantino to the top of the A list, winning him the Palme d’Or at Cannes Film Festival as well as an Academy Award for Best Original Screenplay. Starring John Travolta and Samuel L. Jackson as suave hitmen Vincent Vega and Jules Winnifield who work for drug lord Marsellus Wallace (Ving Rhames) and his cocaine-addicted wife, Mia (Uma Thurman in her most recognisable role). Pulp Fiction is bigger and better than its predecessor with an even more starry cast, bigger budget and killer direction. Even 25 years on, it is still commonly referenced for its costumes and standout scenes such as Jules’ biblical recitation before blowing the brains out of a man who attempted to double-cross Wallace. It is undoubtedly Jackson who is the shining star of this gangster masterpiece as he brings his trademark attitude. You know you did a great job when the person who beat you to the Oscar says that you should have won. There’s a reason why Pulp Fiction marked the start of the iconic collaborations between Tarantino and Jackson. Their love of action, violence and strong language makes the perfect pairing. Besides every time Jackson is onscreen, my favourite scene is Christopher Walken’s iconic monologue as Captain Koons, an Army veteran who survived the war and is gifting his son, Butch (Chandler Lindauer and Brue Willis playing the younger and older versions, respectively) his prized watch. Only Walken could deliver the monologue with the sincerity and conviction that his does.

Jackie Brown (1997)

Jackie Brown is one of those films that finds itself among the top of people’s favourite Tarantino films or worst. Sadly, it is among the bottom of my list but not because it is a bad film by any means. It is simply because of its nature as an adaptation. When I watch a Tarantino, I want to see the usual quirks in the dialogue which I think isn’t there as much as other films. Following Pam Grier as the titular air stewardess who becomes embroiled in a smuggling scandal, Tarantino relies on a great cast to carry out this complex web and pulls it off which include Samuel L. Jackson with a fantastic haircut. Known for her starring roles in Blaxploitation flicks, Grier herself is amazing and had such a powerful presence onscreen. She doesn’t just give a great performances, she becomes Jackie. It’s one of my favourite performances in the Tarantino catalogue but I just feel that there are elements such as the odd pacing that let the film as a whole down. It would be nice to see Tarantino reunite with Grier on a new project, perhaps his 10th (and supposedly last) feature. The film is grounded in reality a bit more than the others and I think the fact that any director could have made this film is why it ranks low. When I watch a Tarantino film, I want it to be distinctively Tarantino but I don’t get that from this film and as previously stated, I think that comes from the fact that it is an adaptation. The man thrives from his originality and it’s what the audience loves.

Kill Bill: Volume 1 (2003)

I remember watching Kill Bill for the first time and being blown away by the strength of the protagonist. The film follows the vengeful ex-assassin The Bride who seeks revenge on her former colleagues when they kill her wedding rehearsal party on the orders of Bill, the man who runs the group. Kill Bill is intended to be watched as one film but due to running length was divided into two volumes. The first volume is seen as the Eastern installment as The Bride ventures to Japan to face the first assassin O-Ren Oshii (Lucy Liu). There are so many reasons why my love for this film is unequivocal such as the clear appreciation for Japanese cinema and culture, the amazing use of animation within the film and most of all, the wide abundance of fleshed out female characters. This film is known for its extreme violence and high body count but don’t let this put you off. Playing the woman who lost everything, including her unborn baby, Thurman’s performance is undeniably ruthless, unapologetic and emotionally charged to the max. Even though she seems unbreakable and unemotional on the surface but you sense her pain underneath the surface from the opening scene with Vernita Green (Vivica A. Fox). Tarantino uses various elements such as sound mixing and colour giving the film its flamboyance and elevating it beyond realism and into fantasy.

Kill Bill: Volume 2 (2004)

Following on from Vol 1, Kill Bill: Vol 2 takes us back to America where the Bride has the second half of her list left to kill in the form of Bill’s failure of a brother, Budd (Michael Madsen), the merciless Elle Driver (Daryl Hannah) and Bill himself (David Carradine). This installment has a larger focus on the Bride’s background before the massacre took place and her journey to becoming an assassin. I love how both films have become a genre of their own. The body count may be a fraction of its predecessor but it still includes some of the most terrifying scenes in film (insert buried alive segment here) and is captivating in its own way. We see the Bride’s emotional journey and her guard slips as she makes some unexpected discoveries in her quest for blood. I think that together, Kill Bill makes for a fantastic saga and would definitely be among my favourite films of the 21st century so far.

Death Proof (2007)

I know there are some people that wouldn’t put Death Proof in the list due to it being part of a two-part feature titled Grindhouse with fellow director and friend, Robert Rodriguez directing Planet Terror (2007). Death Proof is a Texan action led by Kurt Russell as a stuntman who murders women with his car. The film is split into two parts with one group of women’s fates determined the first half and another group in the second half. Death Proof is often viewed as Tarantino’s worst and it is but it’s not a bad film. It is entertaining and Russell is brilliant as the killer in the “death-proof” car. It’s not as complex as other Tarantino films and doesn’t perhaps have the gumption or wow factor that the others have. That being said, for what it wants to be, it delivers in spades. The soundtrack is great and Rose McGowan and Mary Elizabeth Winstead are great in their roles as Pam and Lee, respectively. It’s pretty great that Tarantino and Rodriguez cast McGowan in a leading role in both films to spite Harvey Weinstein for what he did to her. McGowan shines in both films and it would be great to see her make a return to films in roles as amazing as the Grindhouse duo.

Inglourious Basterds (2009)

The first Tarantino film I watched and boy was it a great pick. Undoubtedly one of the best opening scenes in film history, Tarantino manages to create tension with a glass of milk. The film is a reimagining of Nazi-occupied France during the war with Brad Pitt playing Aldo Raine who leads a group of men known as “The Basterds” who are set on killing Nazis and collecting their scalps. Inglourious Basterds also includes what I would argue is Tarantino’s best character today in the erringly charismatic SS Officer, Hans Landa. Played spectacularly by Christoph Waltz in a role that would see him in his Hollywood breakthrough and take home every Supporting Actor Award including the Cannes Film Festival, BAFTA and the Academy Award. Landa is a character who commands your attention. He’s despicable and manipulative, the sociopathic changes are intriguing to watch such as him loving his nickname “Jew Hunter” in the opening scene when intimidating a local farmer, to despising the name when realising that the Nazis are set on losing the war. His motives and outlook can never be understood because he is such a whirlwind character. He seems to take his job seriously one moment then not at all the next and flits the fate of others with ease, not finding it difficult to kill if he sees fit. I don’t think there’s a character that has unsettled a global audience as much as Hans Landa has and yet you long for him to be on the screen because the character is so engaging. Tarantino’s screenwriting is possibly his best, which he clearly knows from the final frame when Aldo looks into the camera and says “this might be my masterpiece”.

Django Unchained (2012)

Bringing his love for spaghetti westerns to the frontline for this Civil War epic, Tarantino’s 3 hour Django Unchained follows Jamie Foxx as the titular character and his quest to find his wife Broomhilda (Kerry Washington) in the Deep South were slavery is very much a thriving business. With the help of bounty hunter Dr King Schultz (Christoph Waltz), Django’s adventure sees Tarantino using an endless amount of fake blood and a controversial multitude of n-words throughout which faced criticism from individuals such as Spike Lee. I do think this is a film plagued with indulgence and excess in its violence, language and numerous endings but it does have very strong points. The cast are perfect in their roles particularly Christoph Waltz as Schultz and Leonardo DiCaprio as plantation owner Calvin Candie. Waltz is charismatic and charming as a man set on freeing slaves and hunting killers and would go on to win a second Best Supporting Actor gong although I personally think his role is a lead not supporting performance. DiCaprio’s performance on the other side is chilling and captivating as he relishes in torturing the slaves.

The Hateful Eight (2015)

Concluding the western trilogy in Tarantino’s catalogue, we venture to Wyoming in the aftermath of the Civil War. There’s a heavy blizzard and eight murderous brutes are trapped in Minnie’s Haberdashery including the honourable John “The Hangman” Ruth (Kurt Russell), country hunter Major Marquis Warren (Samuel L. Jackson) and a career-best from Jennifer Jason Leigh as the disgustingly brilliant Daisy Domergue who John is bringing to Red Rock to hang. Like all Tarantino films, this one is also a mash-up of genres. It is primarily western but is also murder mystery, comedy and thriller. The film’s composer, Ennio Morricone stated that he wrote the score for a horror film which would end up being the film’s strongest point and leading to Morricone’s long-awaited Oscar. It’s a truly brilliant soundtrack and elevates the rhythm of the dialogue which is so important in the moments of extreme tension. Tarantino’s writing is tight and every character has been fleshed out, admittedly some more than others, but each one is memorable in their own way. It’s an interesting inclusion and the film shows a maturity in Tarantino’s filmmaking. There is violence, granted, as expected but Tarantino is more focused on his script and positioning of characters than the actual violence.

Once Upon a Time in Hollywood (2019)

I have already written an extensive review on this one (which you can read here) so I won’t go into too much detail. What I will say is that it has a very good chance of scoring some nominations and potential wins going into awards season. It’s nice seeing Tarantino returning to California for his penultimate film and it seems like a film that he was destined to make. The personal touches are definitely here in what seems to be a return to the place where he grew up.

So we’re all up to date and I eagerly await to see what Tarantino has up his sleeve for his tenth and supposed final feature. Undoubtedly, it will be one of the biggest events in film history with actors and crew members alike clambering at the chance to work with him. There’s only one Tarantino and there certainly won’t be another director like him again.

With all that said and done, here is my final ranking:

1) Kill Bill: Volume 1 (2003)

2) Inglourious Basterds (2009)

3) Reservoir Dogs (1992)

4) Pulp Fiction (1994)

5) Kill Bill: Volume 2 (2004)

6) Once Upon a Time in Hollywood (2019)

7) The Hateful Eight (2015)

8) Django Unchained (2012)

9) Jackie Brown (1997)

10) Death Proof (2007)

I know it’s probably shocking having Kill Bill: Volume 1 at the top, but there is something incredibly empowering to me seeing a female character leading a blockbuster four hour saga. I hope people refer back to this when people claim that audiences don’t want to see women in film.

Which Tarantino is your favourite? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Paul Thomas Anderson: Film Ranking

Paul Thomas Anderson is known for his experimental and fearless quest into exploring characters in ways that are unflinching and at times, uncomfortable.

With the exception of last place (I really struggle with the age-gap in the relationship), I’ve watched these films multiple times and some of them are among my favourite films of all time.

Here’s my ranking for the filmography of Paul Thomas Anderson:

  1. The Master (2012)
  2. There Will Be Blood (2007)
  3. One Battle After Another (2025)
  4. Boogie Nights (1997)
  5. Phantom Thread (2017)
  6. Magnolia (1999)
  7. Inherent Vice (2014)
  8. Punch-Drunk Love (2002)
  9. Hard Eight (1996)
  10. Licorice Pizza (2021)

Which PTA film is your favourite film? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

The Red Shoes (1948)

This technicolour wonderland is one of the best (if not the best!) film in the history of British cinema. Directed by Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger, It’s become known as a masterpiece and is constantly an inspiration for many artists alike and with good reason. Following Victoria Page (Moira Shearer), a ballerina who joins a troupe as the lead in the new ballet The Red Shoes. She begins to find a conflict between her professional relationship with the insufferable genius, Boris Lermontov (Anton Walbrook) and a personal romantic relationship with the troupe’s composer, Julian Craster (Marius Goring). Soon enough, the ballet of The Red Shoes begins to seep into Victoria’s reality and she is eventually broken down by the idealisations that are expected of her. This is a film that breaks the boundaries of the filmmaking experience. It’s very premise of the ballet within the reality of the film soon becomes blurred and the tone of the film changes from a basic aspirational drama to a psychological thriller. Inspired by the Hans Christian Anderson fairytale but given an original makeover by The Archers (as Powell and Pressburger were collectively known), this film delves into the dark side that fairytales ventured into which is a contrast to the Disney films that were dominating the global market. Even 70 years on, the topics in the film feel just as relevant today.

The Archers’ brilliant direction and script effectively contrast the freedom of dance with the claustrophobia and obsession with perfection. Nothing sums this film up more perfectly than Vicky and Boris’ first exchange:

Lermontov: Why do you want to dance?

Vicky: Why do you want to live?

Lermontov: Well, I don’t know exactly why, er, but I must.

Vicky: That’s my answer too.

red_002after.jpg

Dancing gives Vicky the freedom that she craves but unbeknownst to her in the beginning that the freedom she “gains” from dancing for Lermontov is merely his vision. He is the puppet master pulling the strings. As Vicky grows closer to Julian and begins to finesse her own skills, she begins to resist and she finds herself no longer wanting to dance but unable to rid herself of the red shoes. The ballet sequence in which we see Vicky encapsulate her character and venture into the nightmare world of the dance is horrific. Her own emotions have merged with the character. Her dancing has become her life force. Then there’s the conflict she has between Julian who is an aspiring musician who is working for pennies and has the freedom to create the material he wants and then Lermontov who requires strict control over the whole operation. I think it is to Powell and Pressburger’s credit that they manage to succeed in creating three entirely different yet well-rounded characters who all have their motives and flaws. It’s a film that feels progressive even now and doesn’t belong to a particular time. It’s reluctance to slot into a specific genre is also reflective of this as it is a drama, thriller, horror, dance piece all in one.

I think that Shearer’s performance is one of my favourites in any film. She shines as Vicky and really brings out the talent and the grandeur of the role. Despite her privilege (we first see her sat in a private box watching the ballet), Vicky shows her natural passion and talent which impresses Lermontov who initially dismisses her because of her background. Despite Vicky’s flair for ballet, she is still an outsider as her fellow dancers clearly do not have the luxuries that she has. No scene depicts this better than when she thinks she is going to dinner and is dressed to the nines complete with a tiara, only to find the men running the ballet planning the next production in casual attire. Vicky is by no means a perfect individual either. She throws a tantrum when she is unable to keep up with Julian’s tempo during rehearsal. Vicky and Julian’s relationship develops as they realise that they are two sides of the same coin which Lermontov despises. The complexities of Lermontov’s character makes him one of my favourite “villains” film history. His obsession dehumanises those around him, none more so than prima ballerina, Irina Boronskaya (Ludmilla Tchérina) who is abandoned by Lermontov when she announces her engagement. The people around Lermontov are dehumanised puppets where his ambitions must become their ambitions. The moment there is any hint of a life outside the ballet, they are exonerated and in Lermontov’s eyes, they never even existed. His unapologetic way of life is challenged by Vicky and the climatic scene shows a crack in the façade as he breaks down onstage and forces the production to commence without her. The vision becomes empty and the audience gazes at a moving spotlight as it flutters around the stage where Vicky should be.

irina

The music composed by Brian Easdale is nothing short of extraordinary and it effortlessly dances the line between the ballet production and the film reality until eventually both worlds merge into one. The music used in the production of The Red Shoes is spectacular with the church scene in particular remaining a highlight for me. I get chills every time I watch that segment and hear the constant bell as the lead is abandoned and left to die. Jack Cardiff’s choreography for the film is a perfect marriage for the score and the two sail on through the film and set the pace. These components are representative of Julian and Vicky’s talents and the importance of the part that they play into the film cannot be unrecognised. One of my favourite aspects of the film is Hein Heckroth‘s costumes designs. The moment when Vicky’s costume for the ballet of The Red Shoes is revealed is breathtaking and it’s one of my favourite costumes in film. Not to mention the incredible costumes that Vicky wears throughout and the clothes designed by Carven for Irina are exceptional.

My love for this film grows with every view and even thinking about it now, it’s incredible how much it has shaped my taste in film and been such a huge influence in my creativity. It’s such a beautiful film that deserves more than one watch and I think it should be on every film lover’s watch list if they haven’t already seen it. It truly deserves its masterpiece status and remains an important part of cinema history.

What do you think of The Red Shoes? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Nosferatu the Vampyre (1979)

The vampire genre is one that has proven longevity since the popularity of Bram Stoker’s Dracula. Since the inception of film as an artistic genre, we have seen vampires populate horror ever since the 1922 classic Nosferatu. It’s a genre that has become a parody unto itself thanks to its association with teen franchises and the common link between vampirism and sex. What makes Werner Herzog’s 1979 masterpiece so impactful is the sincerity and the minimalism with which it is executed. Herzog brings such a natural approach to the production and yet everything is so clearly calculated. Starring Bruno Ganz as Jonathan Harker, Isabelle Adjani as his wife, Lucy and Klaus Kinski as the titular character, the film follows the story of Jonathan Harker and his encounter with the mysterious Count Dracula who lives among ruins in Transylvania. Dracula subsequently ventures into Wismar and brings along a rat infestation causing a plague in the village while feeling entranced by Lucy. The film is a haunting adaptation of the classic tale and with minimal violence, effectively mounts up fear thanks to the emotionally charged script and the isolating direction.

First thing to talk about is Herzog’s direction and screenplay which I have touched on a bit. What’s genius about Nosferatu the Vampyre is its timelessness. It’s a film that could have been made today and still received in the same way. I think that is a credit to Herzog’s talent as a writer and filmmaker that he is able to create a film that is so unique and provided an impact to the horror genre. The first act of the film follow Jonathan’s journey to Transylvania and is fairly slow burning with the middle portion showing Jonathan’s encounter with Nosferatu and his downfall and the final act sees the plague takeover and final showdown. Herzog successfully creates rounded characters in its main three protagonists: Jonathan, Lucy and Dracula and easily follows their isolated storylines before merging together in Wismar. The film becomes an intricate puzzle and Herzog cleverly manages to slot the pieces in the right place by making it more than a simple linear structure.

Nosferatuwinedinner.jpg

Due to the lack of blood and violence, it’s up to the actors to evoke the fear in the film and the cast does so perfectly. Headed by Ganz and Adjani as the Harkers, we are immediately immersed in their world from the opening shot of Lucy screaming herself awake from a nightmare. Kinski isn’t physically in the film that long and first appears halfway through but his presence can be felt even when he is not onscreen. As we see Jonathan succumb to vampirism, we see his attitude shift from loving husband to isolated madman in a performance that is portrayed brilliantly by Ganz. The highlight for me comes from Adjani for her stellar performance as Lucy. Considering the film was made in 1979, Lucy is such a complex character. Herzog makes the audience believe that she is weak and feeble as she struggles to cope when Jonathan sets off on his journey but her strength shines through in the aftermath of the plague that sets upon Wismar. As we see a society led by men crumble, Lucy can be seen actively trying to solve the problem against the advice of the supposedly wise Dr Van Helsing (Walter Ladengast). The nightmares and instincts that Lucy create a sense of otherworldliness to her as she is viewed as a force for Good against the Evil of Nosferatu.

I don’t think I would be doing the film justice if I were not to discuss the iconic soundtrack provided by Popol Vol and featuring the Vocal Ensemble Gordela. The score brings in new sounds and unexpected notes which exemplify the films various twists and turns. It’s hauntingly beautiful and grabs your attention instantly. The score helps the film’s impact on the viewer and really elevates the experience and horror of the subject matter. The track “Tsintskaro” performed by the Vocal Ensemble Gordela is among the many musical highlights in this film as we see Lucy as she ventures through the town square among the madness of the fellow villagers. The incorporation of this traditional folksong brings forth the culture into the film and it clearly made an impact as it also provided inspiration for Kate Bush who sampled this song in “Hello Earth”.

nosferatu

It goes without saying that Nosferatu the Vampyre is my favourite vampire film and among my top horrors of all time. I think that there is a strong argument to say it is the best vampire film of all time and struggle to think of a horror film that has impacted me more. It’s brilliance comes in its simplicity and its fear comes from the performances which shows what a fantastic cast and crew this film had. All the components mesh together beautifully to create a film that is still haunting and impactful 40 years on.

What do you think of Nosferatu the Vampyre? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Disney Animated Classics: Final Ranking

So after months of reviewing and ranking the Disney Animated Classic library, I have finally got my finished list. I thought it would be a bit easier than what it was and found my opinion and outlook changing on a fair few of the films.

If you haven’t read this series then here’s your chance!

Films 1-5

Films 6-10

Films 11-15

Films 16-20

Films 21-25

Films 26-30

Films 31-35

Films 36-40

Films 41-45

Films 46-50

Films 51-57

Here we go with the final ranking from bottom to top:

57) Winnie the Pooh (2011)

56) Chicken Little (2005)

55) Dinosaur (2000)

54) Home on the Range (2004)

53) Meet the Robinsons (2007)

52) Make Mine Music (1946)

51) The Rescuers Down Under (1990)

50) Fantasia 2000 (2000)

49) Melody Time (1948)

48) Saludos Amigos (1948)

47) The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr. Toad (1949)

46) Fun and Fancy Free (1946)

45) The Fox and the Hound (1981)

44) Lady and the Tramp (1955)

43) Oliver & Company (1988)

42) Robin Hood (1973)

41) The Rescuers (1977)

40) Big Hero 6 (2014)

39) Bolt (2008)

38) Ralph Breaks the Internet (2018)

37) Cinderella (1950)

36) The Sword in the Stone (1963)

35) The Jungle Book (1967)

34) Brother Bear (2003)

33) Treasure Planet (2002)

32) Zootopia (2016)

31) Wreck-It Ralph (2012)

30) The Great Mouse Detective (1986)

29) Atlantis: The Lost Empire (2001)

28) The Black Cauldron (1985)

27) Hercules (1997)

26) Dumbo (1941)

25) Frozen (2013)

24) Tarzan (1999)

23) Pocahontas (1995)

22) Pinocchio (1940)

21) The Three Caballeros (1945)

20) Peter Pan (1953)

19) Moana (2016)

18) The Princess and the Frog (2009)

17) Lilo & Stitch (2002)

16) The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1996)

15) The Emperor’s New Groove (2000)

14) One Hundred and One Dalmatians (1961)

13) The Aristocats (1971)

12) Aladdin (1992)

11) Alice in Wonderland (1951)

10) Tangled (2010)

9) The Little Mermaid (1989)

8) Mulan (1998)

7) The Lion King (1994)

6) The Many Adventures of Winnie of Pooh (1977)

5) Bambi (1942)

4) Sleeping Beauty (1959)

3) Beauty and the Beast (1991)

2) Fantasia (1940)

1) Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937)

So that’s the full ranking! What do you think? Let me know what Disney films are your favourites in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Disney Animated Classics: Numbers 51-57 Ranking

We finally made it! After months of reviews and rankings, this is the final post before we are all up to date before Frozen II hits cinemas. This series of posts have taken us through not only the history of Disney but also a history of animation as we transition from hand-drawn to computer animation. Going from more traditional fairytale retellings to complex stories about identity and love, Disney continues to better itself as a studio although there is still a long way to go. Much like the animation studio in Burbank, it is held up by its traditions like the statues of the Dwarfs that hold up the building itself. This bunch of films sees Disney poke fun of its past in a bid to expose the mistakes that have been made in its portrayal of serious issues such as gender stereotypes and racism. In doing so, it tends to fall flat at times as the gestures don’t seem sincere and apologetic but it is made with good intentions.

We also see Disney’s most successful film as well as the first Best Animated Feature Oscar winners that aren’t Pixar. Disney seems to have found its footing in a landscape dominated by computer animation by using nostalgic elements such as Disney princesses but making them modern. With Disney being the most powerful studio in the world, they are able to recruit star-studded casts and the best crew such as Lin-Manuel Miranda’s stellar soundtrack for Moana and Idina Menzel and Kristen Bell as the two sisters in Frozen.

Just in case you need a refresher, here are the previous installments:

Films 1-5

Films 6-10

Films 11-15

Films 16-20

Films 21-25

Films 26-30

Films 31-35

Films 36-40

Films 41-45

Films 46-50

This list includes the last hand-drawn feature before Disney announced its dedication to computer animation and also includes some of the most progressive films in Disney’s catalogue. These films clearly have an aim to push strong female characters in them and although it isn’t perfect, it’s a step in that direction. There are areas as I have said previously where Disney need to step up such as including LGBT+ characters and a wider array of cultural backgrounds that don’t fall into stereotypical tropes. The films from Disney aren’t perfect but they are trying to right the wrongs of the past while also reflecting modern politics in a way where they please everyone. I don’t necessarily agree with their philosophy but they are a brand and revenue is one of the most important (if not THE most important) factor in the Disney process. Hopefully, they learned from the straight-to-DVD sequel, prequel fiasco of the early noughties and go back to creating films with heart where the audience is the primary focus rather than their pockets.

Without further ado, here are the reviews for films 51-57:

51) Winnie the Pooh (2011)

Marking Disney’s last hand-drawn feature, Winnie the Pooh seems to mark the end of an era as Disney begins to embark on computer-animated films only. I am really sad to say that this film falls flat for me. I just didn’t find it enjoyable in the slightest. The animation is off, the plot is boring and the characters aren’t as lovable. I mean, this is Winnie the Pooh we’re talking about. The characters are loved all around the world but this adaptation mauls the text and tarnishes the franchise. Luckily, we still have The Many Adventures of WInnie the Pooh to enjoy and we can forget about this mess of a film. The animation of the animals isn’t too bad but the design of Christopher Robin and the background looks out of place.

WINNIE-jumbo.jpg

52) Wreck-It Ralph (2012)

Showing that Disney is still capable of producing original material, Wreck-It Ralph follows the titular character (voiced by John C. Reilly) who is the villain of an arcade game wanting to be the good guy for once like “Fix-It Felix”, the insufferable character who defeats Ralph numerous times a day. Ralph is despised by the fellow tenants of the apartment block that he tries to destroy. Sick of the same routine, Ralph escapes to Sugar Rush, another game where players race through lands of candy. There he encounters the tiny Vanellope von Schweet (voiced by Sarah Silverman), a funny and sassy aspiring racer who is also an outcast due to her glitch. Together, they try to become heroes when the arcade’s future is thrown into uncertainty. It’s a film full of nostalgia with its inclusion of iconic game characters such as Pacman and Sonic the Hedgehog but it isn’t held down by this or overwhelmed.

53) Frozen (2013)

The first non-Pixar Disney film to take home the Best Animated Feature Oscar is also the most successful Disney film of all time. Frozen takes its inspiration from “The Snow Queen” by Hans Christian Anderson and follows Princess Anna (voiced by Kristen Bell) who embarks on a quest to find her sister Queen Elsa (voiced by Idina Menzel) when the latter runs away and covers the entire Kingdom of Arendelle in an eternal winter. The film itself is a huge feat for Disney as it features one of the most iconic songs to come out of the Disney catalogue (Oscar winning song, “Let It Go”) as well as some of the most memorable characters in recent years, notably Olaf the sun-loving snowman (voiced by Josh Gad). Frozen is instantly recognisable around the globe and has become a phenomenon and a brand in itself which is hugely impressive for an animated film. Robert Lopez and Kristen Anderson-Lopez’s songwriting feels like the modern equivalent of the iconic songs from Alan Menken and Howard Ashman as they capture the essence of the film from the opening song. It’s not everyday that an animated feature passes the $1 billion mark at the box office but Frozen did it and with two female protagonists at the helm to boot. Who said women don’t make revenue at the box office?

54) Big Hero 6 (2014)

This is the one Disney film that I hadn’t seen before completing this ranking. I have been meaning to watch it but eventually I forgot and never got around to it. Following teenage Hero, a ridiculously intelligent robot enthusiast who has graduate high school early and doesn’t know what to do with his time, we see his budding friendship with Baymax, a robot made by his late brother. Big Hero 6 isn’t a bad film by any means but just as I had suspected, it just isn’t my cup of tea. I completely appreciate the height though as the animation is among Disney’s best in the modern age. Based on a Marvel comic that is based in a fictional city that combines San Francisco and Tokyo, the film appears to take aspects of Japanese culture such as using the language on shop signs and using Japanese characters names in an English-speaking white American setting. I think it is more of a tribute to Japanese anime than maliciously appropriating but it feels as though Big Hero 6 is more of a “trendy” film due the popularity of anime than a sincere offering. The animation style takes inspiration from anime but the style is more Disney’s version of anime. As I say, I don’t think the film is bad but I feel like it could have been more.

Big-Hero-6-to-size-3.jpg

55) Zootopia (2016)

I have marked this down as Zootopia on the ranking as that was the original title although in the UK, this was released as Zootropolis. Set in a universe populated by animals where predators rule the roost and prey are subject to less dangerous careers such as farming. The film follows Judy Hopps (voiced by Ginnifer Goodwin), a rabbit who succeeds in becoming a police officer but is subject to parking duty because she is a rabbit. After numerous predators go missing, Judy eagerly volunteers to find them to prove herself and teams up with con-artist Nick Wilde (voiced by Jason Bateman), a fox who Judy blackmails into assisting her. The film is a clever depiction of racism in American as well as an accurate portrayal of gender politicals and the corruption of authority. Despite the obscure metaphor, the message of equality is easy enough for children to grasp and this is what makes the film more than simple entertainment.

56) Moana (2016)

The latest inclusion of a Disney princess sees us travel to the Polynesian island of Motunui where Moana is destined to become the Chief of her village but she longs to venture out to sea. What follows is a road trip style film where she has to retrieve the Heart of Te Fiti to stop her island suffering from famine. Teaming up with shapeshifting demigod, Maui, Moana must sail across the seas encountering monsters and finding herself along the way. The plot for the film is simple and the structure is reflective of a road-trip movie but elevates this film and makes it special is the soundtrack. Written by Pulitzer Prize winning songwriter Lin-Manuel Miranda, the songs are beautiful and clever, incorporating the language and music style of Polynesian culture naturally. I don’t think the film would be as successful as it is without the soundtrack as the songs really show the character development as Moana grows from a fearful girl wanting to explore to an adventurer who wants to continue her ancestor’s tradition. The animation is stunning and it is by far my favourite inclusion on this list.

57) Ralph Breaks the Internet (2018)

The second Disney sequel to be included on the Animated Classics list, Ralph Breaks the Internet is the eagerly awaited follow-up to 2012’s Wreck-It Ralph. The arcade’s popularity is waning and Vanellope is growing bored with the same racetracks everyday. She wants more and longs to venture to the internet where free-riding games are all the rage. When a player accidentally breaks the steering wheel for the machine after fighting Vanellope for control, Ralph and Vanellope must find $27,000 for a new wheel to purchase before the machine is closed down. They venture into the internet to find the money. The film is even more bonkers than the first and really captures how random the internet really is. The studio even goes as far as to incorporate the dark web by making it sleezy and the creatures that reside there are truly disgusting and disturbing. Unlike The Rescuers Down Under, this is a sequel that feels fresh and familiar at the same time.

ralph-breaks-the-internet-princess-tiana-post3

So that’s it! That’s all the reviews for every Animated Classic so far. It’s been a lot of fun but really challenging having to decide where they all slot because every film is so different (except for The Rescuers and The Rescuers Down Under which is the same film set in different countries). Needless to say, I am very excited to see where Disney goes as we enter a new decade and I hope that they also go back to including hand-drawn animation as well. It’d be nice to see their animations explored in all styles.

Here is my final ranking:

1) Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937)

2) Fantasia (1940)

3) Beauty and the Beast (1991)

4) Sleeping Beauty (1959)

5) Bambi (1942)

6) The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh (1977)

7) The Lion King (1994)

8) Mulan (1998)

9) The Little Mermaid (1989)

10) Tangled (2010)

11) Alice in Wonderland (1951)

12) Aladdin (1992)

13) The Aristocats (1971)

14) One Hundred and One Dalmatians (1961)

15) The Emperor’s New Groove (2000)

16) The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1996)

17) Lilo & Stitch (2002)

18) The Princess and the Frog (2009)

19) Moana (2016)

20) Peter Pan (1953)

21) The Three Caballeros (1945)

22) Pinocchio (1940)

23) Pocahontas (1995)

24) Tarzan (1999)

25) Frozen (2013)

26) Dumbo (1941)

27) Hercules (1997)

28) The Black Cauldron (1985)

29) Atlantis: the Lost Empire (2001)

30) The Great Mouse Detective (1986)

31) Wreck-It Ralph (2012)

32) Zootopia (2016)

33) Treasure Planet (2002)

34) Brother Bear (2003)

35) The Jungle Book (1967)

36) The Sword in the Stone (1963)

37) Cinderella (1950)

38) Ralph Breaks the Internet (2018)

39) Bolt (2008)

40) Big Hero 6 (2014)

41) The Rescuers (1977)

42) Robin Hood (1973)

43) Oliver & Company (1988)

44) Lady and the Tramp (1955)

45) The Fox and the Hound (1981)

46) Fun and Fancy Free (1947)

47) The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr. Toad (1949)

48) Saludos Amigos (1943)

49) Melody Time (1948)

50) Fantasia 2000 (2000)

51) The Rescuers Down Under (1990)

52) Make Mine Music (1946)

53) Meet the Robinsons (2007)

54) Home on the Range (2004)

55) Dinosaur (2000)

56) Chicken Little (2005)

57) Winnie the Pooh (2011)

I am aware that the final rankings may seem shocking and the new films such as Frozen may seem really low on the list, but consider that the ones at the tops are classics that have been with me through childhood, I think they have done really well. The films at the top have proven to be classics that have stood the test of time for decades and still resonate with audiences today whereas the newer films need that chance to breathe.

I am excited to see where Disney go in the future and I am hoping Frozen II continues to push Disney in the right direction as it has done so far with its feminist outlook.

What do you think of my final ranking? What would be your top choice? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Sorry to Bother You (2018)

Another film that I have been meaning to see since its release, Sorry to Bother You is a brilliant study of capitalism in modern day America. Written and directed by Boots Riley in a fantastic debut, we follow Cassius “Cash” Green (Lakeith Stanfield) as he starts a career in RegalView, a telemarketing centre and his rise to the top after using his “white voice” to appeal to white middle-class America. His friends at RegalView, Squeeze (Steven Yeun) and Salvador (Jermaine Fowler) start a union to get basic benefits as the workers only receive commission. Cash quickly becomes a “Power Caller” and is taken to the top floor where he is tasked with selling slave labour on behalf of corrupt company, WorryFree, to large corporations around the world. In a society where money talks, we see Cash’s struggle intensify as he has to choose between security and his relationship with his girlfriend, Detroit (Tessa Thompson). The film flits between genres flawlessly, drifting from comedy to drama to science-fiction in a matter of seconds. It’s refusal to slot into a specific box and the ability to feel relevant shows Riley’s talent for screenwriting. There is so much going on in this film that adds layers and layers of subtext and it’s a testament to the racist and classist struggle that underlies modern society.

First thing to discuss is the direction and script. Despite the film being his directorial debut, Riley brings a film that looks as though he has done this for years. His vision is crystal clear right down to the colours of the doors. The film opens on Cash’s interview at RegalView as he attempts to blag his way to the entry job. He unsuccessful carries out a flamboyant lie which sees him take a huge trophy and employee of the month frame that he had made to make himself seem more impressive. From the get go, Riley establishes Cash as someone who is willing to do what it takes to achieve the American Dream. The capitalist aspect of this film is at the forefront but there are the racist undertones which are made more explicit as Cash finds himself among a rich, white society. Even at the point when he has achieved more than his colleagues on the bottom and top floors, he is still viewed as an outsider.

stby_tessa.0.jpg

This brings me onto the cast who all do a brilliant job, particularly Stanfield and Thompson. The chemistry they have is so natural and the audience feels the intensity when the relationship becomes strained. Cash’s conflict with identity and finding a purpose is one that resonates with a lot of people. He doesn’t fit in with any particular group of people and any stereotypes that society has of black people don’t fit at all. Detroit is an artist who is certain of her identity and has a clear view of the world. There is a literal divide for the characters as the morally sound people populate the bottom floor and live for pennies and the corrupt group working upstairs live extremely privileged lifestyles. We see in a matter of seconds Cash’s life shift as the material items are replaced more luxurious goods such as his car. The film’s dynamic editing is quickfire and snappy to portray the large scale changes that money can make. These material items and the apartment Cash buys detaches him further and further away from his friends. He soon begins to use his “white voice” without realising as his work persona starts to take over and change his personality. 

The point of view in the film is fairly radical in its ideas and the issues it raises are important. We see a Leftist group attempt to fight a large corporation who deal with trading weaponry and slave labour to other countries. Modern society looks at the history of slavery with disgust and yet those at the top are competing to have a slice of the pie when WorryFree’s plan for slave labour piques the interest of the powerful due to low cost and high productivity. Riley is quick to remind the audiences that the problems society had in the past haven’t truly gone away and that it merely embarks a different and more modern disguise. The idea of the call centre and sticking to the script literally brainwashes its employees and forces them to conform to an ideal that fits a white middle-class America. The Leftist group are made to look wild and are even mocked when they throw cans at the staff who try to enter the building with one particular can hitting Cash and giving him a huge cut on his head throughout the film. The wound becomes symbolic of his betrayal to the cause and the physical and metaphorical damage that has been caused by his willingness to partake in the selling of slave labour.

sorry_to_bother_you_ending_explained_armie_hammer

Overall, this is a very strong film with a clear point of view that is important and relevant. It’s a shame that this didn’t get a wider release as I think this is a film that explores difficult themes in a unique way that pushes boundaries in a similar way that Get Out did.

What did you think of Sorry to Bother You? I’m assuming it’s positive because the film is bloody incredible! Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

The Lord of the Rings Trilogy (2001-2003)

Continuing on in my Favourite Film series, this post looks at the films that opened my eyes to filmmaking and made me realise my passion for film. Based on the huge novel by J.R.R Tolkien, The Lord of the Rings trilogy consists of Fellowship of the Ring, The Two Towers and The Return of the King and follows Frodo Baggins (Elijah Wood), a respected hobbit who lives with his adventurous Uncle Bilbo (Ian Holm) who is forced to carry the One Ring to Mordor where he must destroy it in the fires of Mount Doom before the evil Lord Sauron claims the Ring and uses it to rule over Middle Earth. Frodo is accompanied by the Fellowship that consist of his best friend, Samwise Gamgee (Sean Astin), fellow hobbits Merry (Dominic Monaghan) and Pippin (Billy Boyd), men Aragorn (Viggo Mortensen) and Boromir (Sean Bean), elf Legolas (Orlando Bloom), dwarf Gimli (John Rhys-Davies) and wizard Gandalf (Ian McKellen), Frodo must resist the lure of the ring and cross Middle Earth in a bid to save mankind from ruin. The trilogy also features a strong supporting cast with Hugo Weaving as elf Lord Elrond, Liv Tyler as his daughter Arwen who is Aragorn’s love interest and Miranda Otto in badass form as Éowyn. I know it seems a bit unfair to cram the whole trilogy in one post but it is impossible not to consider the vast achievement and scope that Peter Jackson has achieved.

It cannot be underestimated how well these films did upon release. The trilogy well surpassed the $1 billion mark and became instantly iconic around the world with masses of people en route to the premieres at their local cinemas. All three won big come award time with Fellowship of the Ring winning four Academy Awards, The Two Towers winning seven and The Return of the King sweeping the board with eleven nominations and eleven wins, tying with Ben-Hur (1959) and Titanic (1997) for the most wins at the Oscars. All three were critical and commercial smashes and boasted a spectacle despite being a film with fairly indie roots. It was different from other mainstream films because of this and I think the story’s message of fighting for good and friendship is one that resonates with a lot of people.

The cinematic releases see the films lengths at a minimum of 150 minutes per film but the extended editions bring the total running time an amazing 12 hours and what a 12 hours it is. The film achieved critical and commercial success upon release, has dated extremely well and remains one of the best loved franchises in history. Everything about it is perfect to me. I think it is a brilliant adaptation of the books and think the changes and omissions that were made were completely justified for the big screen. I know some people have trouble with the multiple endings at the end of the third film but remember that it is the end of one extremely long epic and that the ends need to be tied nicely. I think it’s a credit to the brilliant screenplays written by Jackson, Fran Walsh and Philippa Boyens that each member of the Fellowship is loved and has their own story. The films are so spectacular and huge that it becomes an immersive experience for the viewer. Jackson contrasts this with moments charged with emotion such as Sam’s speech at the end of The Two Towers which gives the film its heart and separates it from other blockbuster films that have come before it. I couldn’t tell you how many times I have watched these films and I am still noticing new things every time. It’s such a rewarding experience to watch these films and I think Jackson’s direction captures the imagination that Tolkien gives in the novels perfectly.

Sam

The film is cast brilliantly. There are three main storylines when the Fellowship splits with one following Frodo and Sam, another following Merry and Pippin and the third following Aragorn, Legolas and Gimli. Each actor embodies their character personally, particularly Mortensen and McKellen as Aragorn and Gandalf, respectively. Aragorn’s transition from outlaw Strider to the King is amazing as we see him emerge from the shadows and take the lead in the Battle of Helm’s Deep in The Two Towers (I will be discussing Helm’s Deep in further detail soon). On the other hand, we see Gandalf undergo a physical transformation as we shifts from being Gandalf the Grey to Gandalf the White, giving him even stronger powers. Frodo’s development from a hobbit who has never left the Shire to crossing lands and encountering creatures that he would never have seen before. Much like his Uncle Bilbo, Frodo’s sense of what is right helps to combat his fears but his morality is tested when the manipulative Gollum (Andy Serkis) “assists” in helping him reach Mordor. The rapport between the cast offscreen is reflected onscreen and makes for great viewing in scenes such as the Fellowship’s inception and the scenes when they are forced to split up. The intensity of the Fellowship’s bond is so strong and the direction is so intricate that the audience feels as though they are going on the same journey. When watching the climactic scene of The Return of the King unfold, you can’t help but feel relieved when everything is over.

One of the aspects that also makes these films so spectacular are the special effects which are provided by WETA. Led by the amazing Richard Taylor, CGI is only used when an effect is humanly impossible. The behind-the-scenes on the extended editions are fantastic and well worth watching as we watch the creation of Middle Earth unfold. Richard Taylor is the best of the best when it comes to special effects (his multiple Oscars reflect this) and his team are super brilliant and creative. From the intricate details in the designs and the make-up, every single aspect of the film is thought out and executed beautifully. Taylor and his team tie together the make-up, the props and the special effects together that enhances the fantastical elements in the film. Even the effort that goes into collecting short sounds for sound editing and mixing and the process behind it is remarkable to watch. Seeing the passion and the heart that the crew put into the film is touching as everyone has a respect for each other no matter what job they do. Howard Shore’s score for the trilogy is also something that seems revolutionary and new in film. Somehow, he captures the tone perfectly and created that perfect violin solo for “History of the Ring” that is instantly synonymous with the film itself. My favourite piece in the trilogy is “Riders of Rohan” from The Two Towers because it captures that anticipation for battle perfectly and grandeur of marching. The use of delicate strings contrasting with a strong brass sound helps to elevate the film to its epic heights. Shore is one of the best film composers out there and he knocks it out of the park with these scores.

helmsdeep

I don’t think I could justify discussing these films in length and not bring up the brilliance in structure and execution of the major battle scenes. Helm’s Deep in The Two Towers is probably the best battle in film history. Everything about it is remarkable from the set design to the intricate detailing in the costumes and props and then the performances are on top form to boot. It comes at a point in the story where Sauron has managed to accumulate a large 100,000 strong Orc army thanks to the evil Wizard, Saruman (Christopher Lee). The odds are stacked against the soldiers of Rohan but they still vow to battle until the very end. The arrival of the elves from Lothlórien, led by Haldir (Craig Parker), marks a significant shift in the Middle Earth universe as elves infamously refuse to involve themselves in war but the threat of darkness forces them to fight alongside. It makes for an epic battle and one of the most devastating deaths in the trilogy as Haldir meets his end defending Aragorn. Other scenes that are remarkable include Boromir’s death in Fellowship of the Ring which I remember being the first death that I encountered in film and being perplexed that a “good guy” could die in a film. The great thing about The Lord of the Rings trilogy is that it does not patronise the audience but it is suitable for all audiences (maybe not smaller children but from around 6/7 upwards). Even the ending is bittersweet as Frodo sails off for the Undying Lands, leaving the others forever. It isn’t afraid to delve into serious topics while remaining in that fantasy universe and being larger than life.

I would be lying if I said that these films didn’t change my life and my outlook on film. I watch the extended editions every few months and fall in love more and more. There is a strong argument that they are among the greatest films in history and deserve their place one of the most renowned series for its depth and scope. I remember seeing them for the first time in the cinema and being scared and in awe at the same time. I was so captivated that I would watch them on a loop for months on end. It’s amazing to think that these films were such a huge part of my childhood but they are so important to me and I’ll never stop loving them.

What do you think of the The Lord of the Rings? Which installment is your favourite? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Disney Animated Classics: Numbers 46-50 Ranking

This post has been a long one coming as I have been slow reviewing and uploading this series of posts but we are almost there. This is the penultimate post before we are completely up to date just in time for the upcoming release of the much-hyped Frozen II. After featuring Disney during its slump, we see the last of it here and begin to move forward into the era of today known as the Revival. I can’t believe we’re almost at the end but some of the films in this list, I have watched countless times.

As ever you can read the previous instalments here:

Films 1-5

Films 6-10

Films 11-15

Films 16-20

Films 21-25

Films 26-30

Films 31-35

Films 36-40

Films 41-45

With the introduction of the new era, we begin to see Disney pushing itself into the 21st century and reflecting the politics and society of today. With that in mind we begin to see a reintroduction to new Disney princesses who are more diverse and independent, inclusion of characters of different races and backgrounds. Disney has a long way to go with this as we eagerly await the first openly LGBT+ character in an animated film from them whereas other animation studios such as Laika have been more inclusive and fearless. However, the films in this list show Disney starting to go in the right direction.

Here’s the reviews for films 46-50:

46) Chicken Little (2005)

This film was everywhere on its release and marked a start for Disney beginning to incorporate computer animation more in its repertoire. The result, however, was extremely disappointing. Chicken Little sees Zach Braff as the titular character who convinces his town that the sky is falling and becomes a laughing stock. What the townspeople don’t know is that it is actually true and the town is on the brink of an alien invasion. The story itself is sweet but what lets it down is the animation, poor character development and overly tortured dialogue. The film reeks of noughties trends and tries so hard to be relevant that it becomes cringy to watch. The character of Chicken Little isn’t particularly well-rounded as he spends most of the film falling over or not communicating properly with other characters, mainly his father. Unlike Pixar, the animation doesn’t feel as modern as it should be (Pixar released The Incredibles in 2004 for comparison) and it seems that the plot is disjointed and isn’t pulled off as they imagined. The film did well commercially but not critically and I think that the team did take this on board. There’s a reason that we don’t see or hear of Chicken Little at the Disney Parks and I don’t think it’d even be considered for a reboot at any point. This definitely seems like Disney’s lowest point.

47) Meet the Robinsons (2007)

This was an interesting film for me to watch as I had only just seen it the once previously. Following orphan Lewis whose inventions prevent him from being adopted, he invents a machine to help him remember his mother’s face. At a science fair to debut this project, he is encountered by Wilbur Robinson, a teenager from the future who tells Lewis that the future is in jeopardy if his machine is stolen. Inspired by Tomorrowland at Disney’s park and using Disney’s philosophy “keep moving forward”, the film has a beautiful story and message but sadly it is overwhelmed by one dimensional characters and a strained first act. On rewatching, I did like the film a lot more than the first time but to me it is on the lower tier of Disney films. This is only because there is an abundance of characters and none of them feel really well-rounded. The animation is also problematic at times although a big improvement on Chicken Little. Scenes such as the incident with his peanut butter and jelly gun looks out of place and doesn’t match the aesthetic of the film.

48) Bolt (2008)

It seems hard to believe that Bolt was released a year after Meet the Robinsons. The animation looks so much more advanced and it feels like Disney going back to its original formula while pushing the studio into the future with the critical success that they had hoped for Chicken Little. Bolt (voiced by John Travolta) is a Hollywood stunt dog with his own TV show with his owner, Penny (voiced by Miley Cyrus). When he is mistakenly shipped to New York, he must team up with Mittens the cat and Rhino the hamster to reunite with Penny in Hollywood. The plot is a simple road movie and Disney goes back to using a big star ensemble to draw in the audiences but it works. It’s a film that shows that Disney are capable of bringing quality and heart to their films and starts to mark their presence in the 21st century in a computer animated dominated landscape. The soundtrack is another highlight for this film with the closing song “I Thought I Lost You” sung by Travolta and Cyrus a nice ending and ridiculously catchy.

49) The Princess and the Frog (2009)

After a few unsuccessful attempts at computer animation, Disney returned to hand-drawn animation for this seemingly classic retelling of The Princess and the Frog. Set in 1920s New Orleans, waitress Tiana kisses Prince Naveen, a talking frog, and is ultimately turned into one herself. Together, Tiana and Naveen have to figure out how to undo the curse before they run out of time and become frogs forever. This film was a significant step in Disney history as it features Disney’s first black princess. Unlike the previous films of the 2000s, the film feels sincere and harks back to the classic fairytales and yet sits nicely in a 21st century landscape. The soundtrack is standout and Facilier is one of the scariest villains in Disney history. The animation also feels traditional with its bright New Orleans carnival colours mixed with the Bayou landscape. It’s a gorgeous film that is a true testament to Disney getting itself back on track. There’s great character development and a nice cast of characters who are also developed, particularly friendly firefly, Ray and the jazz loving alligator, Louis.

50) Tangled (2010)

My favourite film on this particular post, Tangled is a quirky retelling of Rapunzel, a princess with long hair who is locked away in a tower. In this film, Rapunzel (voiced by Mandy Moore) is an anxiety-ridden young woman seeking adventure who, along with her sidekick, chameleon Pascal, heads on a quest to visit the “floating lights” with outlaw Flynn (voiced by Zacahary Levi). The animation is fantastic, the soundtrack is beautiful and the film as a whole knocks it out the park. It’s a shame that this was released the same year as Toy Story 3 which outshadowed every animated film that year. Fortunately, Tangled has succeeded in maintaining a legacy and a loyalty among fans with merchandise constantly updated and appearances by the characters in the parks. I think that “I See the Light” is one of the best songs and scenes in Disney history. Everything about it is perfection and brings what we love about Disney films to the surface. The animation of the lanterns and the accompanying scenes in the kingdom are amazingly detailed and filled with texture. It’s one of the most popular modern DIsney films for a reason and deserves more than one watch.

That’s the end of the penultimate post with one extended post to go for films 51-57. We’re deep into the Revival now and the next post features the first non-Pixar Disney films to win the Best Animated Feature Award at the Oscars showing that they are at the height of their game. The next post sees Disney venture into reboots, sequels and originals that vary in topics such as friendship, love and isolation.

I promise I will try to be quick with uploading the next post so I can be up to date and ready to see where Frozen II will slot into the list.

Here is my ranking:

1) Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937)

2) Fantasia (1940)

3) Beauty and the Beast (1991)

4) Sleeping Beauty (1959)

5) Bambi (1942)

6) The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh (1977)

7) The Lion King (1994)

8) Mulan (1998)

9) The Little Mermaid (1989)

10) Tangled (2010)

11) Alice in Wonderland (1951)

12) Aladdin (1992)

13) The Aristocats (1971)

14) One Hundred and One Dalmatians (1961)

15) The Emperor’s New Groove (2000)

16) The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1996)

17) Lilo & Stitch (2002)

18) The Princess and the Frog (2009)

19) Peter Pan (1953)

20) The Three Caballeros (1945)

21) Pinocchio (1940)

22) Pocahontas (1995)

23) Tarzan (1999)

24) Dumbo (1941)

25) Hercules (1997)

26) The Black Cauldron (1985)

27) Atlantis: the Lost Empire (2001)

28) The Great Mouse Detective (1986)

29) Treasure Planet (2002)

30) Brother Bear (2003)

31) The Jungle Book (1967)

32) The Sword in the Stone (1963)

33) Cinderella (1950)

34) Bolt (2008)

35) The Rescuers (1977)

36) Robin Hood (1973)

37) Oliver & Company (1988)

38) Lady and the Tramp (1955)

39) The Fox and the Hound (1981)

40) Fun and Fancy Free (1947)

41) The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr. Toad (1949)

42) Saludos Amigos (1943)

43) Melody Time (1948)

44) Fantasia 2000 (2000)

45) The Rescuers Down Under (1990)

46) Make Mine Music (1946)

47) Meet the Robinsons (2007)

48) Home on the Range (2004)

49) Dinosaur (2000)

50) Chicken Little (2005)

What do you think of the list? Let me know in the comments below!