Tag: screenwriter

Categories
Review

Die My Love (2025)

Die My Love is the latest offering from the incredible Lynne Ramsay. Coming almost a decade after her previous film, You Were Never Really Here, Die My Love follows doomed lovers, Grace (Jennifer Lawrence) and Jackson (Robert Pattinson) as they navigate parenthood in their new home. The film blurs the line between reality and the darkness that Grace begins to experience as she struggles with the pressures of being a new mother.

What makes Lynne Ramsay an excellent director is the fearlessness in her approach. Her films utilise morally ambiguous protagonists in a bid to discuss a larger and more universal topic which in Die My Love is postnatal depression and the pressures placed on mothers. As ever, the direction is striking as Ramsay uses the house as a metaphor for Grace’s state of mind. The opening scenes show the house empty but filled with potential and excitement as Grace and Jackson dance and goof around. Soon enough following the birth of their baby, the house becomes cluttered and dark to the point where it is completely unrecognisable. We see her try to keep herself under control while using the neighbouring woods as an outlet for her animalistic movements. However, the scene where Grace loses control and suffers a breakdown in the bathroom is extremely harrowing as she does significant damage to herself and the home in such a tiny enclosed space.

Jennifer Lawrence is electric in her turn as Grace, giving a phenomenal performance that is reminiscent of mother! in its darkness and grit. Lawrence is in a new phase of her career with complete control over her roles while also adding producer to her resume. If mother! showed a woman struggling to maintain order in a world that actively works against her then Die My Love is the result of that woman endlessly fighting against the judgement of those around her. This performance feels personal and has a rawness that only works thanks to Lawrence throwing herself into the role with everything she’s got. Grace is a character that pushes Lawrence beyond any other performance she has done and while there are some great physical moments that showcase Lawrence’s range, the scenes where she is able to convey her struggles subtly are the most heartbreaking. The scene where Grace and Jackson go to a friend’s house and Grace feels judged by the other mums. There is a fire and sorrow in her eyes that is so poignant that you feel her mind spiraling as she is triggered.

Robert Pattinson has such an eccentric filmography and that shows no sign of stopping any time soon. While the film is undeniably Lawrence’s, he still holds his own as Jackson. Grace’s struggles are front and centre to the film, but in the background we have Jackson who is grieving the recent loss of his father while also adjusting to his new role as father to his son and the pressures of being the sole moneymaker in the household. His attempts to make life better and more “normal” such as buying a dog may seem well-intended but in not warning Grace and refusing to help with the dog’s training, the sentiment doesn’t translate. In trying to create a façade of a nuclear American family, Jackson forces Grace to adhere to stereotypical traditional tropes, which is something that no woman can truly meet in this day and age.

Sissy Spacek rejects the bitchy mother-in-law tropes too frequently seen. Her performance as Jackson’s mother, Pam, is small but mighty, serving as an ally for Grace. Where other filmmakers would craft a character that is “out to get” Grace, Pam is understanding and concerned. She understands firsthand what Grace is going through in a way Jackson can’t because she too has suffered from the same pressures of motherhood. There’s a melancholy in Spacek’s performance as she is unable to stop Grace’s suffering, even when giving her the knowledge from hindsight.

Seamus McGarvey’s cinematography plays a big part in encapsulating Grace’s slip from reality as her depression and hopelessness builds. McGarvey uses open spaces to highlight the terror in the unknown. The most heartbreaking moments in the film come when the camera lingers on Grace’s face a little too long where we begin to feel her discomfort and misplacement. There is also a powerlessness as the camera sits almost at a distance like an observer, unable to intervene and make things better. This adds to the frustration that the characters feel as they succumb to their struggles.

While Die My Love is not an easy watch in any way, it’s unflinching look into postnatal depression and the realities of motherhood will undoubtedly leave its mark on you. Lawrence delivers a career-best performance that feels raw and fearless, making Grace not only a fully-rounded character, but one of the most “human” characters put to screen. Hopefully we won’t have to wait another decade for Ramsay’s next film because her strength to explore these issues in such an artistic and complex way creates some of the best characters we have seen in cinema.

Categories
Review

Belfast (2021)

When it comes to award season, there are a few films that make their way into the majority of nomination fields and acquire a high number of Oscar nominations. Kenneth Branagh’s autobiographical drama, Belfast is one of those films this year and follows Branagh’s experience as a child in the titular city during the late 1960s when The Troubles began. The film focuses on protagonist, Buddy (Jude Hill), based on Branagh himself, and the period in his life when Protestant loyalists begin to target the homes and businesses of the Catholics on Buddy’s street. We see Buddy in all aspects of his life, but mostly the time that he spends with his Ma (Caitríona Balfe), Pa (Jamie Dornan), Granny (Judi Dench), and Pop (Ciarán Hinds) as the political turmoil in Ireland begins to grow increasingly dangerous and resulting in a potential move to England to escape. It’s a unique look at a tragic period of time through the eyes of a child, so we see The Troubles in glimpses and glances.

The film is both written and directed by Kenneth Branagh, and it is clear from the offset that this is his most personal project to date as we are introduced to a montage of present-day Belfast before we are transported to the same area in the past in black and white. The film is undoubtedly autobiographical, but Branagh chose to change names and even calls the protagonist, Buddy, who is based on himself. The screenplay is written from Buddy’s perspective as a young boy, meaning that the audience is provided with snippets of the real life chaos that was taking place. This serves to hinder and serve the film as on one hand, it provides a unique perspective on the topic while also meaning that we are not introduced to the full threats that were drawing closer and closer if the film had a more generalised viewpoint.

Despite the long list of stars in Belfast’s line-up, the cast is actually led by newcomer Jude Hill who plays protagonist, Buddy. It could be understandable for a newcomer, even more so a nine-year-old, to be intimidated by a slew of stars as well as Branagh, but Hill takes it all in his stride. From the moment he appears onscreen, it’s clear that the film is in safe hands as he is deeply entertaining while maintaining the innocence to the political conflict that is happening around him. The opening scene in which we see the Protestant militants attacking the Catholic homes on his street perfectly demonstrates the end of innocence as Buddy has to deal with the real-life problems that he and his family face, especially as his Pa is increasingly pressured to join the Protestants in their fight. Despite the problems going on around him, Buddy is just like any other child and has his interests, mainly his love for films and there are scenes dotted through the film of his trips to the cinema, which is clearly drawn from Branagh’s own love for cinema and Belfast is clearly a love letter to his childhood and the place that helped him to develop this passion.

There is an abundance of supporting characters in the film and one of the best performances goes to Caitríona Balfe who is magnificent as Buddy’s mother. There is a lot of unspoken characterisation to “Ma” and Balfe brings this forth perfectly. Buddy idolizes his father who works away for long periods of time while his mother has to run the household and raise Buddy and his brother, while simultaneously dealing with the political conflicts going on. There are glimpses of her struggles as Buddy listens in on her desperate calls to her husband while he is working, and we see her facade begin to crack as she has to remain strong for her boys. What makes Balfe’s performance so brilliant is how resonant and relatable it is and the fact that she has been snubbed in the Best Supporting Actress category at the Oscars is one of the biggest snubs, especially since Judi Dench’s performance doesn’t have the same level of impact.

When it comes to the supporting male actors, the best performance easily goes to Ciarán Hinds who portrays Buddy’s grandfather, “Pop”. His performance is the perfect example of a small role that has huge influence over the film and its storyline. From his first scene through to his health deterioration, Pop is the foundation of Buddy’s family and acts as Buddy’s father-in-lieu when his father is working away in England. Hinds is charming and lovable as Pop, serving as Buddy’s life coach when the latter is unsure how to approach a girl he likes in class while also providing plenty of wisdom during the turbulent times by helping Buddy to understand what is going on around him. Hinds’ final scene is by far the highlight of the film as this is when the story is brought to its emotional climax and the family foundation is broken and begins to fall apart, reflecting the surrounding society.

Belfast is sure to be a crowd-pleaser and shows a different side to Branagh’s creative output that we haven’t really seen from him before, while also giving him the chance to be vulnerable as a filmmaker. It may not always pack the punch that it wants to, but there are some really beautiful scenes and with Balfe and Hinds’ exceptional performances, Belfast is a film that definitely deserves a watch.

What did you think of Belfast? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

BFI Flare Festival 2021: Jump, Darling

BFI Flare Festival is all about showcasing the newest films that explore LGBT+ issues and the variety this year follows all paths of life from all corners of the globe. Opening the festival this year is Phil Connell’s Jump, Darling. The film follows Russell (Thomas Duplessie), a drag queen who moves back in with his grandmother, Margaret (Oscar winner Cloris Leachman) after his breakup. As Russell tries to decide what he wants to do with his life, he also finds himself taking care of Margaret who is reluctant to go into a care home despite her ailing health. The film was one of the last films Leachman starred in before she passed away earlier this year.

Connell’s screenplay and direction is nicely paced and he manages to get fully realised characters in its short 90 minute run. Despite the difference in lifestyles between Russell and Margaret, their similarities begin to show as both are trapped in their particular situations. Where Maragret is physically trapped as she is unable to leave the house, Russell is finding himself unable to fulfil his potential as a successful actor and feels the pressure of failure from family and friends. The scenes where Connell’s direction really shines is when Russell performs lip syncs as his drag alter ego, Fishy Falters. These scenes allow Connell to shift to a more experimental style of filmmaking as he mixes in differing camera angles and lighting that takes Russell out of his reality when he becomes Fishy Falters.

Duplessie is fantastic in the leading role as Russell and stands his own against Oscar winner Leachman. We first see Russell in a successful nightclub prepping for his drag debut as Fishy Falters. After stumbling on his way to the stage and leaving the club, he breaks up with his partner who thinks he is should pursue acting as he doesn’t think drag is a worthy career. When he moves in with his grandmother, we begin to see the clash between the two worlds that he seems to inhabit. Where Duplessie really shines is showing the difference between Russell’s life as a man who is trying to find his way versus his performances as the super confident drag queen, Fishy Falters. Duplessie’s stellar lip syncing is on par with the performances we see from professional drag Queens throughout the film.

As expected, Leachman is brilliantly cast as Margaret, the family matriarch who simply refuses to be put in a care home despite pressure from her daughter. Unable to drive or properly care for herself, Russell’s arrival brings a certain amount of freedom as Maragret begins to encounter old friends and start to find the joy in her life again. With Leachman having a stellar career playing strong women, Jump, Darling is no exception as we see Margaret grasping at the little control she has left. Wanting to cater to her grandson and encourage him to push out of his comfort zones, Margaret is quite a confrontational character but she also has a softer side when it comes to Russell. The scenes between Leachman and Duplessie are great to watch and even in her twilight years, Leachman shows that her star quality never went away.

One thing that I thought was particularly great in this film was the editing. Lev Lewis edits perfectly by utilising a more traditional cut in the scenes with the domestic troubles but then changing to a more exciting cut during the musical scenes. This helps to shift the genre of the film from drama to musical and keeps the film unpredictable and attentive. Lewis’ editing works perfectly to show the two worlds that Russell lives in and perfectly chronicles the emotional journey he takes.

Overall, Jump, Darling marks a great start to this year’s BFI Flare Festival and marks the start to a wonderful career for Duplessie whilst also being a lovely swansong for Hollywood icon, Leachman. Connell uses the minimalist surroundings and limited characters allows the two protagonists to shine and puts their acting at the centre. The chemistry between Duplessie and Leachman feels natural and the screenplay allows the relationship to develop naturally without resorting to any exposition. Jump, Darling is a film that will leave you laughing, crying and every other emotion in between.

Jump, Darling is opening the BFI Flare Festival.

Categories
Uncategorised

Mank (2020)

There are few films that have generated such concersation this year than David Fincher’s new film, Mank. Following Hollywood screenwriter, Herman J. Mankiewicz (Gary Oldman) and the inception and creation of Orson Welles’ masterpiece, Citizen Kane, Mank is not your regular run-off-the-mill Hollywood film that glorifies filmmaking. Fincher looks into the dark side of film production and the manipulation that happens behind the scenes. Admittedly, I wasn’t sure what to expect going in beyond it having an amazing cast and crew and the backlash it appears to be receiving on social media but I personally loved it. Not only in its black and white appearance but the tone and direction reflects Citizen Kane which at points blends fact and fiction as Mank begins to succumb to the alcoholism that haunts him.

David Fincher’s direction is fantastic as ever and I truly think this may be the film that puts an Oscar in his hands. Based on a screenplay written by his late father, Jack Fincher, Mank is an intricate character study into the mind of a brilliant man who is challenged by the rules and regulations of the Hollywood Studios. In many ways, Mank feels as though you are watching a film from the Golden Age at points but from a behind-the-scenes vantage point. What is fantastic about how Fincher directs is the shift in tone. There are many points that feel like a thriller or even horror as Mank descends in madness while writing the project. The whole span of the film is sixty days and yet the amount of action feels as though it spans years. The passion Fincher has, arguably in part due to adapting his late father’s script, is evident and I think he does a flawless job at conveying the darkness that lies beneath the glamour. What is brilliant about Fincher’s films is that each one is completely different from the other. He truly is one of the most exciting filmmakers working today, even if his filmography isn’t the most extensive.

Gary Oldman’s performance has played a major part of the discussion in the conversations regarding the film. Playing a man 20 years his junior does seem a little miscast but look beyond this and there lies an amazing performance. Mank is such a layered man who loves his craft and his lifestyle yet isn’t afraid to bite the hand that feeds him. He treasures his friendships but risks it all in the name of his sharp wit and even harsher writing. Oldman is undoubtedly one of the best living actors and although Mank isn’t the best performance of his whole career, it’s still a fantastic turn.

The support in this film comes from Amanda Seyfried who, in my opinion, is the highlight of the film for me. Playing 1930s Hollywood icon, Marion Davies was no easy feat. During the Golden Age of Hollywood, Davies was well-known and admired and unfortunately her affair with William Randolph Hearst (Charles Dance) is what history associates her with. Seyfried will no doubt be nominated for a Best Supporting Actress and I really hope she wins. She’s given flawless performances, particularly in comedies in her early career such as Mean Girls (2004) and Jennifer’s Body (2009). Mank is a welcome dramatic stretch for her while still maintaining the intelligent wit Davies possessed. From her first scene, Seyfried is magnetic in the same nostalgic way the leading ladies were commanded to be.

There are many scenes in Mank that have stayed with me but the one that is the true standout is when Mank begins to discuss his plans for his upcoming film at a dinner that is attended by Marion Davies, Louis B. Mayer (Arliss Howard) and William Randolph Hearst no less. Oldman’s phenomenal acting in this scene is horrendously intense and extremely uncomfortable as he insults and berates the guests at the dinner before setting his attention on Hearst and discrediting his name and political career. Watching Mank make his way slowly around the table as the guests start to leave one by one until only Mank, Mayer and Hearst are the only ones left.

Overall, Mank is a fantastic insight into the overlooked mind behind what is often considered the greatest film ever made. The similarities in filming style of Citizen Kane and Mank are evident that go beyond the black and white stylistic choice. Citizen Kane may be about Hearst but really the creation of the film is primarily about Mank himself and his outlook on the world. Watching Citizen Kane with this new outlook will definitely make it a different experience. I have also been thinking of writing a David Fincher ranking list and it’ll be interesting to see where Mank would fall.

What did you think of Mank? Let me know in the comments below!

Mank is available to stream now on Netflix.

Categories
Uncategorised

Marielle Heller: Film Ranking

Marielle Heller is one of the most exciting filmmakers working in the industry. Although she is not a household name in the mainstream yet, she has proven her talent and range in the three feature films she has directed so far. All three are adaptations of different mediums which also shows Heller’s skill as a writer. Starting with The Diary of a Teenage Girl in 2015 thrust Heller as an emerging writer/director thanks to its controversial and unflinching portrayal of its subject matter of underage sex. Following this, Heller made a dramatic star out of comedienne Melissa McCarthy in biopic Can You Ever Forgive Me? in 2018 followed by 2019’s A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood which follows a journalist writing a piece on American icon, Mister Rogers. Her absence from major award nominations has been subject to controversy with stars such as fellow director Greta Gerwig and Natalie Portman using their platform to promote her work.

Here are my mini reviews and rankings for the films by Marielle Heller:

The Diary of a Teenage Girl (2015)

Heller’s debut is the perfect scene stealer opening up with 15 year old Minnie (Bel Powley) walking in the park with her confident voice over stating “I had sex today. Holy shit!” Heller’s script and direction follows Minnie from a distance allowing her life to play out with the complicated relationships she has with her mum, Charlotte (Kristen Wiig) and Charlotte’s boyfriend, Monroe (Alexander Skarsgård). Powley’s breakout performance is nothing short of perfection. She comes across as confident and all-knowing, even recording audio diaries. Based on a hybrid novel combining novel and graphic novel by Phoebe Gloeckner. Minnie winds up in a sexual relationship with Monroe and believes she is in love blind to the realities of the situation. As the affair goes on, Monroe is dismissive of Minnie’s satisfaction and is aware what he is doing is wrong. The film is a unique look into the sexual mistreatment of women and girls and how society expects them to act in order to satisfy the patriarchy. It is a film about personal and emotional growth with Minnie eventually learning to become independent and satisfied in herself and her talents as an artist. Despite her flaws and mistakes, she thrives above what society thinks of her and does what makes her happy.

Can You Ever Forgive Me? (2018)

Heller’s follow-up Can You Ever Forgive Me? is based on the 2008 memoir of the same name by writer Lee Israel. Following Israel (Melissa McCarthy) as she forges letters written by famous writers and sells them off to earn extra money, Can You Ever Forgive Me? is a film about the writer and artist desperation. At the beginning of the film, Israel is experiencing a career slump, unable to secure an advance for her book and is forced to sell her possessions to pay her bills. What starts from selling a personal letter from Katharine Hepburn spirals into forging letters from celebrities with scandalous details. Enlisting the help of her friend, Jack (Richard E. Grant), the two begin stealing letters from libraries and archives as well as forging other letters. McCarthy and Grant bring career best performances and earned them Oscar nominations for Best Actress in a Leading Role and Best Actor in a Supporting Role (Grant’s first and, to date, only Oscar nomination!).

A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood (2019)

One of my favourite films from last year, this underrated gem stars Tom Hanks as American treasure, Mister Rogers and features Matthew Rhys as a skeptical reporter who is asigned to write on Rogers. I have written a longer review for A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood here which you can read. Bringing Tom Hanks his first Oscar nomination in years, A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood utilises wonderful puppetry in a film that is heartwarming with a deep message. Among a film landscape that is full of fear and dread, it’s nice to see a film about kindness and love being made.

Each film has its strengths and they are all so different which makes it difficult to rank them even though there are only three. Here is my ranking for Heller’s films:

1) The Diary of a Teenage Girl

2) A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood

3) Can You Ever Forgive Me?

I really recommend giving each of these films a viewing at least once. Heller has a knack for drawing out brilliant and unexpected performances in films thay serve as flawless examinations of its characters.

Have you seen any Marielle Heller films? Which ones are your favourites? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Robert Eggers: Double Feature

In my series where I look at the emerging directors this century, it was only matter of time before I discuss the work of horror director Robert Eggers. Usually associated with his A24 cohort Ari Aster, Eggers’ two films are psychological studies of its characters with a darker colour palette than Aster’s work. His 2015 debut The VVitch was an instant success and a major talking point among the film community on release. There hadn’t been a film quite like it and it’s unapologetic take on the breakdown of a family. His 2019 film The Lighthouse couldn’t be more different. Whereas The VVitch was full of female empowerment and the emergence of a strong young woman finding her place in the world, The Lighthouse is heavily masculine and becomes a double character study rather than the spotlight being on a single character. The overall style of Eggers’ films is a perfect mix of gritty realism with a hint of fantasy and magic. Despite the unrealistic elements, the films are definitely grounded in their realism and the audience reaction is unaffected.

Both of his films were distributed by A24 and are currently discussed alongside Ari Aster’s films Hereditary and Midsommar as they are A24 and horror as well but Aster and Eggers have completely different angles. If anything, each film is a great example of how horror has becoming the best genre to look at current topical issues. I have written on Aster which can be read here and recommend watching his films but here are my mini reviews for Robert Eggers’ films The VVitch and The Lighthouse.

The VVitch (2015)

Eggers’ debut was talked about a lot on release because of its unrelenting dismantling of the family home. Following Thomasin (Anya Taylor-Joy), a young girl on the verge of womanhood struggling with her place in the family home after they are banished to fend for themselves after rejecting a Puritan colony. The family are then convinced there is a witch causing mayhem and won’t stop until the entire unit is killed. Starting with the baffling disappearance of her baby brother, Samuel after playing peekaboo with him, Eggers isn’t afraid of tackling taboos that even classical horrors don’t dare venture. Critics were more favourable towards the film whereas audiences weren’t as convinced although it was still a success at the box office. I think that because it was marketed as a straightforward horror, audiences weren’t expecting the many layers that this film has. It is more about Thomasin’s characterisation than the gruesome death scenes or jump scares. Taylor-Joy is nothing short than spectacular as Thomasin and brings that juxtaposition between childlike innocence and the more adult curiousity. She feeds into the fear to her twin brother and sister innocently at the beginning but then the more sinister intentions underlying the film begin to creep out. It’s definitely a horror film for the 21st century and helped to pave the way for more horrors that have intricate character studies. The VVitch could be viewed as a film exploring female empowerment and rejecting the traditional patriarchal society.

The Lighthouse (2019)

One of the most anticipated films of 2019, The Lighthouse stars Robert Pattinson and Willem Dafoe as warring lighthouse keepers, Winslow and Wake, respectively, who are stranded on an island during the storm. It’s not a horror in the traditional sense but the rising tension and characters’ waning sanity are the perfect combination to making one of the best horrors in recent years. Pattinson and Dafoe are pretty much the only characters for the majority of the film with Valeriia Karaman making an appearance as the Mermaid who seduces Winslow. The Lighthouse is a film unlike any other nevermind a horror film unlike any other. FIlmed in black and white 1.19:1 aspect ratio, the film is reminiscent of a claustrophobic vintage horror, reflective of the era it is trying to portray. Loosely based on the short story “The Light-House” by Edgar Allen-Poe, Eggers and his brother Max Eggers worked the script to a late 19th century setting and wanted to keep the focus on the deterioation of its male protagonists. I have written a more in-depth review of The Lighthouse which can be read here. Every aspect of this film is perfect from the casting to the writing to the set design. It was nominated for one Academy Award for Best Cinematography which was very well-deserved but I really feel that it should have been nominated for more, especially Willem Dafoe for Best Supporting Actor. Dafoe consistently brings his A game and the fact that The Lighthouse is among his best says a lot.

Eggers is currently working on his upcoming project The Northman which will star mega stars like Nicole Kidman and Alexander Skarsgard as well as reuniting the director with Anya Taylor-Joy and Willem Dafoe so needless to say there are high expectations. From what I can tell, this new film will be the first Eggers film not to be distributed by A24 as 20th Century Studios have locked it in which shows the faith the big budget studios have in him. Hopefully the studio will give him the freedom to follow his vision through like A24 do. There is no doubt that Eggers has a hugely exciting future ahead of him in the film industry and it will be interested to see what else he comes up with.

Which Robert Eggers is your favourite? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Ari Aster: Double Feature

Following on from my previous post on Jordan Peele (which you can read here), I thought I would discuss another writer/director whose work in the horror genre has caused waves in recent years. Ari Aster is a writer/director who has used the horror films of the past to inspire and create horror films for modern times. Again his filmography consists of two feature films but both of these have created an impact and have been the basis for much discussion. Both are critical and commercial successes and are among the most profitable films for its distributor, A24.

What Aster does particularly well is how he explores mental health in his protagonists. He isn’t afraid to push his characters to the very edge of breaking point and allow the plot to explode into chaos. I have previously written a post on how anxiety is used in Midsommar and Darren Aronofsky’s mother! that you can read here and the points can be applied to Annie in Hereditary.

Hereditary (2018)
Ari Aster’s feature debut Hereditary released in 2018 and in a similar vein to Get Out has become a classic in modern horror. Toni Collette plays Annie, a miniatures artist and mother of two who believes that her and her family are being haunted after the death of her mother. This film led one of the best marketing strategies in recent years as it completely misled the audience in terms of what it was about. Collette is nothing short of phenomenal as Annie with her unpredictability and hysteria. As well as Collette, Milly Shapiro who plays Annie’s daughter, Charlie, does a fantastic job in her feature debut. Aster’s direction and script is really tight and well-rounded but Collette’s performance elevates the entire film-watching experience and it’s insane that her performance wasn’t recognised on the awards circuit. Annie is a deeply complex character who finds it difficult to live with her family as the hauntings become more severe. The script serves as a boiling pot for Annie that eventually blows up in an argument between her and her son, Peter (Alex Wolff) that is among the best acting of the year. 

Midsommar (2019)
Aster’s second film, Midsommar, was released only a year after its predecessor and it is completely different and exciting in every way. Starring Oscar-nominee Florence Pugh as Dani, a student who recently lost her entire family after her sister commits a murder-suicide, who goes to Sweden with her emotionally distant boyfriend and his friends for a summer festival at one of the friend’s commune. I have written a fuller review of Midsommar here which you can read here but in short, I absolutely love this film. It was my favourite film of 2019 and with good reason. The way it explores relationship deterioation and manipulation as well as living with anxiety and depression felt very real. Despite being in an open space, the direction felt claustrophobic to reflect Dani’s mental health and overwhelmed state of mind. There is a lot to be divulged and analysed in this film which makes it enjoyable to watch time and time again. Pugh is exceptional as Dani and the supporting cast lead by Jack Reynor who plays her boyfriend, Christian as well as WIlliam Jackson Harper and Will Poulter as Christian’s friends Josh and Mark, respectively are all fantastic and dynamic.

Aster has done a great job with his two features with both featuring brilliant female protagonists. I am looking forward to seeing what Aster brings out next. Midsommar particularly provided one of my favourite cinema experiences as the attestupa scene was one I did not see coming at all.

What do you think of Aster’s films? Let me know in the comments below!
Categories
Director Ranking Spotlight

Jordan Peele: Film Ranking

When it comes to the best horror visionaries of the 21st century, it is most likely that Jordan Peele’s name will crop up. He rose to fame for his comedic acting alongside Keegan-Michael Key in the hit shows Mad TV and Key & Peele and the two are still often cast together such as their voice work in last year’s Toy Story 4.

Aside from being a comedian, Peele is also an avid horror film fan and turned his attention to writing and directing horror films that have redefined the genre in recent years. He has experienced resounding successes both critically and commercially, which is fantastic for a rising voice in the horror genre especially. His films are original and topical, using the horror genre to explore the African American experience in modern-day America.

A four-time Oscar nominee, Peele is one of a few who has been nominated for Best Picture, Best Director and Best Original Screenplay for his debut, winning the latter for 2017’s stellar Get Out. He has received an additional Best Picture nomination for his contribution as Producer for Spike Lee’s incredible BlacKkKlansman (2018). Peele is on course to become a master of the horror genre and it’s exciting to see what films he creates next.

Get Out (2017)

Peele’s directorial debut was a game-changer in many ways. The hype for this film spread like wildfire and it soon became one of the most critical and commercial successes of 2017. Following African-American photographer Chris (Daniel Kaluuya) who sets off with his white girlfriend, Rose (Allison Williams) to meet her family over the weekend which gradually shifts from a nervous first encounter to a nightmare beyond belief. Peele flips the horror genre on its head with Get Out. Horror films in general tend to exaggerate racial stereotypes a lot more than other genres but what Peele absolutely rejects this and gives us an array of characters who are well-rounded with their own background stories and motives thanks to the incredible script. The film is filled with so many layers that you can notice something different every time you watch the film. From the brilliant supporting performances from Lakeith Stanfield and Lil Rel Howery to Michael Abels’ impeccable score. What sets it apart from other horrors is that the villains are white middle-class liberals whereas a lot of racism in horror is at the hands of the right-wing. The film was nominated for a slew of awards including nominations for Academy Awards for Best Picture, Best Director and Best Actor in a Leading Role for Kaluuya, winning Peele the Oscar for Best Original Screenplay in a year that was incredibly strong in competition. Get Out is only 3 years old and yet has already solidified itself as a horror classic and will certainly be marked as a milestone for the genre.

Us (2019)

Peele’s follow up is another demonstration of his talent as a skilled writer and director. Starring Oscar winner Lupita Nyongo’o as Adelaide, a woman who is haunted by a traumatic encounter she experienced as a child, and her family as they go on vacation. Aside from a couple of weird coincidences, everything seems to be going okay until the family are confronted by a family of doppelgangers who attempt to kill their counterparts. Us is a highly intense film filled with puzzle pieces that are eventually placed together. It is a joy to watch and Nyongo’o’s performance particularly is a knockout. To simply compare this film to Get Out would be ridiculous because they are so different in tone. Again, Michael Abels’ score is absolutely brilliant with its classical elements to reflect Adelaide’s ballet background. Gifted with four times the budget Get Out had, Peele takes advtange using multiple locations and the cast as expected is flawless with Winston Duke playing Adelaide’s husband, Gabe and Elisabeth Moss as family friend, Kitty leading the supporting cast. It’s a shame that this film wasn’t included in the awards circuit, especially for Peele’s screenplay and Nyongo’o’s spectacular performance.

Thanks to his genius and contribution, Peele has helped horror become the best genre to explore topical issues. He is clearly inspired and admires horror films but isn’t afraid to reject the stereotypes and add his own voice to the mix. It’s incredible to think how much Peele has achieved in the space of a few years and only serves for further excitement as to what projects he works on next, including as screenwriter and producer for the upcoming Candyman.

What do you think of Jordan Peele’s films? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

1917 (2019)

1917 is a World War I epic that seems to be the one to beat when it comes to the Best Picture award. Co-written, directed and produced by Sam Mendes, the film acts as a tribute to his grandfather, Alfred Mendes, based on stories that he would tell about the war. Following two young soldiers, Schofield (George MacKay) and Blake (Dean-Charles Chapman) who are tasked with travelling across enemy lines to warn off a British attack before they fall into a trap set by the Germans. The film has become well-regarded for its flawless editing, designed to look like two continuous shots. As well as beautiful technique, 1917 also boasts a stunning cast that includes well-loved actor of the big screen such as Colin Firth and Benedict Cumberbatch as well as TV favourites such as Daniel Mays and Andrew Scott. As expected, Mendes delivers and the continuous shots and editing only exemplify the non-stop nature of war. There is only one point in which the audience is allowed to relax at the start of the third act of the film. The writing is simple as Mendes lays focus on the physicality and the atmosphere rather than the dialogue. There are few monologues and those with speeches such as Andrew Scott’s Lieutenant Leslie are at rare moments of stand still. Co-written by Mendes and Krysty Wilson-Cairns, the script is minimalist in dialogue. Even when following the two Lance Corporals on their journey, we never really hear Schofield’s backstory because he is so withdrawn. One brilliant scene is when Schofield is picked up by a passing British unit and they are sat in the back of a truck. Schofield sits silently as the soldiers around him comment on their various backgrounds, imitate their General and comment on whether occupying other countries is worth the damage. It’s a poignant scene which brings in a humane aspect that is often missing from World War films.

The performances are impressive, particularly by George MacKay who is always on camera. He carries the film in the same way that he carries the message to the troops. It is no easy feat as an actor to hold so much pressure from such a big film but MacKay has shown promise from the early days in his career and his subsequent breakout performances in Pride (2014) and Captain Fantastic (2016). 1917 exploits MacKay to a mainstream audience that he won’t have been subject to in such a way previously. His Lance Corporal Schofield is reluctant to go on the mission and keeps his cards close to his chest but his determination to see it through is fearless, particularly in the final scenes as he runs through the trenches. Schofield and Blake appear to have different takes for their mission at the beginning. Blake is insistent on setting off immediately whereas Schofield logically believes in waiting until dark. Because of the emotional stake that Blake has in the mission (his brother is among the troops heading into the trap), Schofield has to ensure that Blake’s heart doesn’t lead his head.

1917

The two protagonists balance each other out as Blake risks his own life to save Schofield when a bomb is set off in a German trench. Chapman is also fantastic as Blake who appears naïve due to his sentimental nature. When encountering a German soldier whose plane was shot down in a dogfight, Blake’s gut reaction is to assist and get the soldier some water to ease the pain whereas Schofield doesn’t hesitate to shoot at the enemy. As mentioned before, the supporting cast is littered with stars from the small and silver screens. Admittedly, the supporting cast are granted one scene each so it’s more of a cameo, but each actor makes the most of their moments. Andrew Scott particularly delivers a brilliant monologue as a Lieutenant who has little hope in winning the war whereas Benedict Cumberbatch’s Colonel Mackenzie views he retreat from battle as a sign of defeat. The fleeting appearances from the supporting characters is thanks to the perfectly linear narrative of the film itself. We see the two Lance Corporals setting off to warn the Devonshire Regiment and ending with Schofield sat beside a tree in a mirror image of the opening shot.

It would be a big misjustice not to mention the revolutionary cinematography and editing provided by Roger Deakins and Lee Smith, respectively. Both men are at the top of the game in their respected fields and they work fantastically as a team. What these men have managed to achieve feels as claustrophobic and in your face as the war itself. There are many comments from people saying that the continuous effect took some getting used to but for me it felt natural and flowed perfectly. The editing is in a similar vein to the technique used in Birdman but on a bigger scale. What Deakins does so brilliantly is simultaneously provide big explosions shots filled with action while also maintaining great focus on the individual protagonists’ faces. Despite everything that is going on around the soldiers, the audiences’ eyes are fixated on the characters. Deakins’ colour palette is muted as expected in a war film with greens and browns. There are no exaggerated colours or futuristic spectacles. Deakins ensures that the film is very much grounded in its reality. Together, Deakins and Smith manage to create a film that is visually captivating and stunning, making the best use of the environment given and its limited landscapes.

19172

On the musical side of things, Thomas Newman’s score for this film is beyond incredible and has deservedly earned him his 15th Academy Award nomination. This year has seen a strong competition in the score category with both Thomas and Randy Newman pulling punches for their scores for 1917 and Marriage Story, respectively. Undoubtedly, the Best Original Score gong will go to Hildur Guðnadóttir for her stellar work on Joker making her the first woman to walk away with the award. It shouldn’t go unnoticed, however, that Thomas Newman’s score is among his best. Much like the editing, the film is reliant on its score which acts like a thread connecting the scenes. Needless to say, if Newman does end up winning, I wouldn’t be disappointed.

Overall, 1917 has proven to be a much better film than I had originally anticipated and I found myself moved and stunned by the technical and artistic achievement that Mendes has managed to pull off. I’m not sure if it’s a film that you need to watch more than once as I personally got everything out of the film that I needed in one go. I imagine that in time, it will become renowned and known for its technical aspects and the uniqueness in that field rather than the characters.

What do you think of 1917? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Yentl (1983)

Barbra Streisand’s directorial debut follows the titular character (Streisand), a young woman living in an Ashkenazi Jewish community in the early 20th century who disguises as a man to study in a Yeshiva after her father passes away. Based on the short story by Isaac Bashevis Singer and cowritten by Streisand and Jack Rosenthal, Yentl is a film about subverting the cultural and societal norm as well as conflicts between religion and morality. Yentl Mendel is constantly questioning the way of life in her village and is looked down upon by the townspeople for being unmarried with no prospect of settling down. It is only when she disguises as a man called Anshel that she finds a place of belonging and her views are accepted and even celebrated. Problems occur when Yentl begins to fall in love with her mentor, Avigdor (Mandy Patinkin) who is in love with his ex-fiancée Hadass (Amy Irving) who then in turn falls in love with Anshel. It is the very definition of a love triangle and allows the film to have some lighter moments such as Anshel and Hadass’ wedding night. Winning Streisand a Best Director award at the Golden Globes making her the first and to date only woman to win the accolade, Yentl marks a huge step for female filmmakers in the mainstream thanks to its star appeal and critical and commercial success.

Streisand as director is really remarkable. You can sense the passion that she has for this film. Although there are trademark comedic moments and musical numbers that are identifiable with a Streisand picture, there is no doubt that the dramatic elements and aesthetic allow Streisand to explore a darker approach that we hadn’t really seen from her on film previously. Streisand’s female gaze gives this film a new perspective that we haven’t seen before in film. Instead of condemning Yentl’s choices, we view Anshel as a sensitive man who isn’t afraid of his vulnerability despite living in a male dominated environment. Where it not for Streisand’s feminine interpretation, the performance of Anshel could have slipped into caricature and taken away from the mature themes that the film discusses. Streisand lends a heavy feminist focus as she disputes why a woman cannot have the same outlook and expectation of a man while still appreciating the jobs that the women do. Yentl can be viewed as a crossover between genders and she doesn’t really fit in and altering her gender isn’t an issue. The pursuit of knowledge and equality overtakes the ideals expected of her. There are so many different readings that could be made when watching this film. It has been argued that Yentl could be considered as a queer film thanks to its discussions on gender and sexuality which adds a more progressive meaning to the story.

yentl.jpg

In terms of her performance, it’s best to view Streisand as playing two roles rather than one such is her success in distinctly differentiating the two. Her Yentl is typical Streisand: sassy, witty and strong with an ambition to subvert the norm. This is the Streisand that we have grown to love in her previous cinematic outings. What is different about Yentl is that she is aware that she is trapped within her local community. When reciting the Talmud at her father’s funeral, it becomes such a scandal and causes widespread gossip. The transition period between Yentl and Anshel comes from her journey to the Yeshiva which includes her heartbreaking rendition of “Papa, Can You Hear Me?” where Yentl begs her father for forgiveness for her decision to disguise as a man in pursuit of an education. She sits alone in the forest at nighttime with nothing but a candle for light and it is then when the realisation of what she has done comes to fruition. It is also the point where she knows that there is no turning back and thus has to embody the identity of Anshel. Streisand’s Anshel takes a bit of getting used to in the same way as Yentl getting used to her new identity. We witness Anshel practicing his tone of voice and mannerisms, making sure not to appear too feminine without risking his integrity.

Mandy Patinkin does a wonderful job as Avigdor, Anshel’s friend and mentor at the Yeshiva who is initially engaged to Hadass. Avigdor isn’t afraid to be vulnerable to Anshel and his other male friends but the idea of being vulnerable to Hadass or her mother disgusts him. He doesn’t allow himself to get involved in any confrontation and is always calm when in her company. Avigdor seems so progressive when we are first introduced because he is so accepting of Anshel but it is easy to forget that Anshel is Yentl and he has no idea. When he spouts ideas about a woman’s true place in the home and that Hadass cannot think for herself, it comes across as a shock and ignorant but despite his intelligence, Avigdor is still a product of an environment that looks down on women. In another brilliant supporting turn, Amy Irving was deservedly nominated for an Oscar for Best Supporting Actress in her role as Hadass. When we first meet Hadass, she appears to fulfill all the criteria of the perfect woman and seems to do everything at the men’s commands. What we don’t realise is that she has successfully supressed any feeling of rebellion and it is when she is married to Anshel that she shares her aspirations to learn more. Yentl is in the middle of these two characters and yet it is because of Yentl that they are drawn closer together and allow themselves a more progressive and happier life.

yentl2.png

The amazing music is composed by Michel Legrand, one of the best composers that the film industry had to offer. From his imagination we were given the incredible song “Papa, Can You Hear Me?” composed by Legrand with lyrics written by Alan and Marilyn Bergman. The trio won an Oscar for Best Original Song Score and Its Adaptation or Adaptation Score. In true Legrand fashion, the music is whimsical and brings an essence of fairytale to the story. The musical numbers are far and few between but the score itself is wonderfully subtle when you compare to Legrand’s catalogue such as the music for Les Parapluies De Cherbourg (The Umbrellas of Cherbourg). The songs are suited to Streisand’s amazing vocal range, especially the aforementioned song but rather than being full of show-stopping numbers like the ones in Funny Girl, Legrand makes use of Yentl’s male identity and gives the songs a lower key register so Yentl is singing as if she were a man herself.

Overall, Yentl is a film that has helped pave the way for female filmmakers in mainstream cinema. It is a film not without flaws but it has beauty in its ability to discuss ideas that are considered taboo. Even within the Orthodox setting in the early 20th century, there are still similarities that Streisand is able to get across to link with the modern day. Yentl is not a film that Streisand wishes to make all about herself despite directing and starring in it but the story of how women are often subjected to misogyny and not afforded the chances of their male counterparts. It is equal parts drama and musical and a smaller part comedy which encapsulates Yentl’s character.

What did you think of Yentl? Let me know in the comments below!