The Big Kahuna. The game changer. The film that made Anderson a solidified mainstream beast of cinema. There Will Be Blood takes its inspiration from the novel Oil! by Upton Sinclair and follows Daniel Plainview (played magnificently by Daniel Day-Lewis) and his climb to the top during the Southern California Oil Boom.
The film is set in the late 19th century and is a seemingly traditional retelling of the American Dream but as with any PTA, not all is as it seems.
Quickly Plainview’s ambition is replaced with cruelty, deception and manipulation particularly in the relationship deterioration with his son, H. W. Plainview (played by Dillon Freasier and Russell Harvard as child and adult H. W., respectively) and the mistreatment of local preacher/proclaimed prophet, Eli Sunday (Paul Dano who also plays Eli’s twin brother, Paul Sunday).
Winning Day-Lewis a second Best Actor Oscar (my favourite Day-Lewis performance) and featuring a career smash for Dano, Anderson shows his control and maturity as a filmmaker with this one. Masterpiece is a term often thrown around meaninglessly but it is more than justified here.
It’s a shame that it was up against the Coen Brothers’ offering, No Country for Old Men, as it lost out on several deserved Oscars. Not to say No Country for Old Men shouldn’t have won but I personally prefer There Will Be Blood due to how well-realised Plainview’s character is while the direction is as slick as the oil they drill.
In recent years, we have seen many franchises emerge with plenty of reboots, prequels and sequels dominating the film industry. A lot of these films tend to provide plenty of nostalgia and familiarity that is enjoyable to watch, but offers nothing new. One such franchise that is reinvented time and time again is DC’s Batman. Following Christopher Nolan’s Dark Knight Trilogy, it felt as though the franchise couldn’t get more gritty and dark, but Matt Reeves proves it can be done with this year’s The Batman. The film is filled with characters that we all know and love including the titular character himself (Robert Pattinson), Catwoman (Zoë Kravitz), and Detective Gordon (Jeffrey Wright) to name a few. Rather than fill the film with the usual villains such as the Joker, Reeves has chosen villains who have been overlooked or not as widely used cinematically with the Riddler (Paul Dano) and the Penguin (Colin Farrell) being the major villains in the film. Unlike other Batman adaptations, this Batman is not as refined in his fighting skills, making him more realistic, while also finding out more about what his parents were really like and the mystery surrounding their untimely death.
The Batman is directed by Matt Reeves who cowrote the screenplay with Peter Craig. Reeves development as a true visionary feels as though it has come full circle since he became a household name in 2008 with Cloverfield. Just as Cloverfield pushed narrative boundaries and explored alternative filming techniques, Reeves applies this innovative way of thinking with The Batman. From the telescopic point of view that opens the film, to the brilliantly shot climactic scene in which Batman beats up a load of cronies in a dark hallway with the only lighting provided by gunfire, Reeves brings an element of true imagination to a studio blockbuster and shows that not all superhero films need to contain a formulaic structure and content. The screenplay is particularly brilliant and perfectly delves into Bruce’s character without feeling too over the top, while also having plenty of fun with the Riddler’s character and his clues.
Robert Pattinson proves himself more than capable of taking on the Caped Crusader and can simply be explained as a perfect mix between Michael Keaton’s and Christian Bale’s performances. The film has more interest and focus in seeing the character as Batman rather than Bruce Wayne, which serves the narrative brilliantly. Pattinson’s Batman is unlike others because his fighting skills aren’t perfect and there are moments when he is getting beaten up by thugs. The Batman is a much more violent take on the character, but one that feels more realistic and less like a regular superhero film as it feels as though Batman is just a man wearing a suit who can fight. Pattinson’s Bruce is moody and isolated from the world, despite living in the centre of the city, while his Batman is relentless and will do anything to get to the bottom of the situation. The scene in which Batman confronts the Riddler in Arkham State Hospital is the best in the film as it shows the character break face as he tries to figure out what the villain has planned.
Playing opposite Pattinson is Zoë Kravitz as Catwoman in a turn that feels revolutionary for a character that has been overtly sexualised over the years. Kravitz’s Catwoman is unapologetic in her actions and isn’t afraid to stand up for what she believes in, even if it isn’t necessarily the morally right thing. From the moment that Kravitz steps onto the screen, the audience is immediately drawn to her. What is amazing about Kravitz’s performance is how well she develops Selina’s character throughout the film, so her turn never gets boring or loses steam. Not only does she have great chemistry with Pattinson which makes the film gripping to watch in its entirety, but Kravitz’s Catwoman is incredibly strong and capable of asserting her own agency without the need for male assistance or approval, which feels revolutionary and authentic in how it is portrayed onscreen.
The main antagonist in the film is the Riddler, who is played phenomenally by the always fantastic, Paul Dano. In a career that has shown gigantic range, Dano appears to be getting the recognition that he has long deserved from mainstream audiences thanks to his menacing Riddler. It’s an unpredictable performance that shows the same level of dedication and characterisation that he brings to films such as There Will Be Blood and Prisoners. Even when he is not onscreen, his presence is felt through the entire film in the game of cat and mouse thanks to his ability to be a perfect match for Pattinson’s Batman. Dano may not be obvious choice for a superhero villain, but he’s proven that he is more than capable of performing exceptionally well in any genre.
In a film full of brilliant performances it’s difficult to choose which one was best of all, but in this instance, it has to go to Colin Farrell who is completely unrecognisable as the Penguin, a sleezy mobster who helps Carmine Falcone (John Turturro) run Gotham’s crime scene. Although he only has a small role in the film, Farrell is absolutely magnetic and steals every scene he is in. The chase scene between him and Batman is brilliantly executed and highly intense. Farrell has been knocking it out of the park for years and proven that he is a flawless character actor who is able to fully immerse himself into each character he plays. His Penguin doesn’t feel like a caricature, although there are some funny moments, and it’s exciting to see if he will star in the sequel.
The score is composed by Michael Giacchino, who has brought us a slew of iconic soundtracks over the years spanning across various genres including family films such as Ratatouille and Up as well as blockbusters such as Jurassic World and Rogue One: A Star Wars Story. It only makes sense that someone like Giacchino fits the bill considering his resume, and he delivers his best score in years. The main character theme consists of four hard-hitting notes that have become immediately identifiable. The opening track “Can’t Fight City Halloween” is riveting and atmospheric, instantly transporting the audience into the grime and horror of Gotham City.
The Batman delivers brilliance from start to end thanks to its gritty aesthetic, innovative filming techniques, and incredible characterisation filled with great performances from both the heroes and the villains. Pattinson’s career has gone from strength to strength and with The Batman, he is able to translate his indie successes to a huge blockbuster. Reeves has done a great job of setting up this particular Batman universe, and with the hint of a new villain (probably the Joker) incorporated into the film’s narrative, it’s only a matter of time before we see a sequel to The Batman.
What did you think of The Batman? Let me know in the comments below!
It’s no secret that the COVID-19 pandemic saw the delay of many films which has resulted in a huge amount of quality films being released this year. One such film to suffer from pandemic delays is Jane Campion’s The Power of the Dog which is her first feature film in 12 years since 2009’s Bright Star. Based on the novel of the same name by Thomas Savage, The Power of the Dog follows the lives of two brothers, Phil Burbank (Benedict Cumberbatch) and George Burbank (Jesse Plemons) who own a family ranch and how their lives change when George falls in love with – and quickly marries – Rose (Kirsten Dunst), a widow whose former husband died of suicide. In true Campion style, the film provides deep characterisation, stunning scenery, and a script that is so beautifully written and paced that you feel completely immersed in the film and its time period.
Written and directed by Jane Campion, The Power of the Dog has proven to be a huge hit at festivals and it’s easy to see why. The film feels authentically Western in its slow pacing with her writing and directing giving the film plenty of chance to breathe. The way Campion utilises natural light in her film brings a rawness that allows the landscape to show off its natural beauty without using any filters or techniques. Equally, Campion’s ability to make the audience feel claustrophobic in the open space is so clever such as the scene when Phil and Peter are on their travels through the hills. What is so wonderful about Campion’s filmmaking is that she has such an intricate knowledge of space and how to make use of the space. In one scene, we see George and Rose driving back to the ranch after dropping Peter off at school and they are surrounded by rolling hills which seems to go on for miles; however, what was once an open space is gradually zoomed into George and Rose as they try to dance and it suddenly feels as though the space has become much smaller. Unsurprisingly, the film has brought Campion much acclaim for her directing and she even won the Silver Bear at this year’s Venice Film Festival.
Leading the film is Benedict Cumberbatch as Phil Burbank in what is arguably his best performance to date. To say that Phil is a deeply complex character is an understatement. He is a character plagued by his past as he constantly refers to his late mentor – and lover – Bronco Henry, who has since passed away. The result of which is a character that internalises who he is and replaces it with toxic masculinity, feigning power and confidence through brutality and strength. Phil’s leadership and charisma is hard to miss as he makes his presence known no matter where he is. Cumberbatch is captivating in a role that may seem mismatched at first but his dedication and relentlessness allows us to him in an entirely new light. He has become a firm favourite for the Best Actor awards this coming awards season and it is easy to see why. Even if he doesn’t win, he will definitely earn nominations in what is a performance of a lifetime.
Playing Phil’s brother, George, is Jesse Plemons and the two characters couldn’t be more different. Where Phil is overly observant to a fault, George is oblivious although his heart is in the right place. Unable to see his wife suffering or catering to her needs, George tries to force her into a societal position that she doesn’t feel comfortable with. This isn’t out of malice or bullying but because he does what he believes is expected of him. Plemons is always great no matter what role he does and it’s a treat to see him in a bigger role. The scene where George confronts Phil about the latter’s treatment of Rose is ridiculously intense and this is because Plemons and Cumberbatch manage to bring an authenticity to their roles that feels genuine and brotherly. Kirsten Dunst plays Rose, a woman who recently lost her husband to suicide and is struggling to run the family restaurant. She marries George shortly after meeting him but soon finds that her brother-in-law, Phil, does not approve of their marriage, believing her to be a gold digger. Dunst is one of a few women in the film but her presence is duly noted and she commands each scene she is in, especially as her character delves into alcoholism. The lack of female roles is completely on purpose as the film is showing what happens when an environment is dominated by men and, specifically, toxic masculinity. Rose’s background is completely different to Phil’s entirely and it is these differences that cause friction between them. The scene in which Rose practices on the piano and eventually finds herself in competition with Phil’s banjo playing is somehow terrifying and comedic at the same time. Dunst’s performance in this scene is brilliant as we feel the fear in the character and her emotional struggle as she cannot finish her piece.
Another performance in this film that has been receiving a lot of attention is Kodi Smit-McPhee’s turn as Rose’s son, Peter. The first time we see Peter, he is delicately cutting pieces of paper which are then shaped to make paper flowers which he then takes to his father’s grave. From his sensitive nature to his crisp and neat appearance, it is clear that there is something that sets Peter apart from the other men in the area. This is pointed out during his first encounter with Phil and the rest of the ranchers as Phil makes fun of Peter’s flowers and the way he dresses and carries himself. Assuming that he is homosexual, Phil and the other men hurl homophobic insults at Peter wherever he goes and bully him relentlessly; however, Peter appears indifferent to their insults and carries on with his research to become a medical doctor. Smit-McPhee’s performance is the perfect opposition to Phil. Where Cumberbatch’s performance is loud and commanding, Smit-McPhee’s is much quiet and subtle while still grabbing the audience’s attention. The climactic scene between Phil and Peter in the barn is incredibly intense and has the audience at the edge of their seat and this is due to Cumberbatch and Smit-McPhee’s flawless chemistry.
One of the many highlights in this film is the beautiful score which is composed by Johnny Greenwood. What makes Greenwood one of the best composers working today is the huge range of films that he has worked on. Whether it is a period drama such as The Master or a thriller such as You Were Never Really Here, Greenwood always knocks it out off the park. He has delved into the Western genre before with his game-changing score for There Will Be Blood and yet somehow, he manages to create a completely new and different sound for the music in this film. Featuring hints of Western and thriller, Greenwood integrates his signature sounds with atmospheric tones that work seamlessly with the film. The music never overwhelms the film itself and yet manages to stand out and elevate the mood of the scene. Hopefully we will see Greenwood receive another Academy Award nomination for his work and maybe even a win.
The Power of the Dog was a film worth waiting for and more. Hopefully, it will see a lot of recognition come awards season thanks to the breath-taking direction, stellar script and impeccable performances, especially by Cumberbatch. Campion has come back with a bang and here’s hoping she doesn’t wait as long before making her next feature.
The Power of the Dog is showing at this year’s London Film Festival!
Paul Thomas Anderson is known for his experimental and fearless quest into exploring characters in ways that are unflinching and at times, uncomfortable.
With the exception of last place (I really struggle with the age-gap in the relationship), I’ve watched these films multiple times and some of them are among my favourite films of all time.
Here’s my ranking for the filmography of Paul Thomas Anderson:
When it comes to listing the greatest actors in history, it would be pretty arrogant to not throw Daniel Day-Lewis’ name into the mix. The man puts the method in method acting and is renowned for his ability to truly become his characters. His refusal to break character offscreen or follow the typical hollywood lifestyle brings a sense of mystique to this genius who clearly has a passion for acting. Famously selective about his roles from early on in his career, he may not have the most extensive filmography but what is there is only the best and is full of brilliant collaborations with the best actors and directors.
He is the only actor to have won the Best Leading Actor Oscar three times and remains a titan in acting, even if he has retired (he has “retired” before and returned so who knows if this retirement will stick). Day-Lewis is in a league of his own when it comes to actors working today (the closest would probably be Joaquin Phoenix or Gary Oldman).
It’s been hard to pick top 5 but I have managed to do so. Here is my list of top 5 performances in chronological:
My Beautiful Laundrette (1985)
This early entry in Day-Lewis’ filmography is perhaps one of his most controversial. Made in 1985, Day-Lewis portrays Johnny Burfoot, a white Londoner who embarks on a romantic relationship with Omar Ali (Gordon Warnecke) who is struggling with his identity as a British-born gay man of Pakistani descent in volatile, racist Britain. The eeriness of this film comes in how relevant it feels today 35 years on. Stephen Frears refusing to bow to stereotype in this film, creating characters that are rounded and break the mould. In a general landscape that isolated homosexuals, My Beautiful Laundrette shows a relationship filled with adventure and excitement. The chemistry between the two leads is magnetic and it’s great to see a film about a gay couple that has a happy ending, something that is notoriously refused in the majority of mainstream LGBT+ cinema.
My Left Foot (1989)
The one that propelled Day-Lewis to stardom. Portraying disabled artist Christy Brown, Day-Lewis went full method for the role and refused to break character offscreen to channel the struggle of Brown’s experience with cerebral palsy. It brought Day-Lewis a global audience and his first Academy Award nomination and win. Christy is mischievous and hilarious, aiming to live his life to the fullest. A supporting cast led by Fiona Shaw who plaus Dr. EIleen Cole, Christy’s carer and Brenda Fricker as Bridget Fagan brown, Christy’s mother (who also won a Supporting ACtress Oscar for her performance) brings an authneticity to this low-budget Irish production. The film relies on the performance of its actors and refuses to use any Hollywood flares or special effects. This is a great introduction into the career of Daniel Day-Lewis and shows how capable and fearless he was from early in his career as well as providing an insight into what will become a flourishing and groundbreaking filmography.
Gangs of New York (2002)
The film that paired Day-Lewis up with Martin Scorsese for an epic that explores the conflict between Irish and Italian Americans. Based on a true story, it’s a film that explores what it takes to be a “true” American. In this nativist vs. immigrant plot, Day-Lewis plays William “Bill the Butcher” Cutting, a cruel leader of the nativist gang who refuse to allow the Irish settlers ownership on American land. Leonardo DiCaprio plays Amstardam whose father Vallon (Liam Neeson) dies at the hands of Bill in the opening scene and seeks his revenge years later under his new alias. The film itself falls short of its potential due to its odd pacing and the overall scope of the film feeling too big for its three hour running time but Day-Lewis’ performance elevates it and makes it worth the watch. Bill is maniacal and devious with no redeeming quality but he is also extremely charismatic. It’s flamboyant and subtle at the same time. Only Day-Lewis could pull the performance off in this way.
There Will Be Blood(2007)
The role to end all roles. The character of Daniel Plainview is nothing short of iconic. Day-Lewis is on fire in this role as a greedy prospector who soughts to purchase land that sits on oil. The film deservedly won him his second Best Actor Academy Award and for good reason. It’s a brilliant performance that shows the true greed of mankind and how much they are willing to destroy in order to gain more power. This film marks his first collaboration with Paul Thomas Anderson and serves as a definite high point for both of their careers. They are a duo who click together so well with Anderson’s penchant for brilliant character development and Day-Lewis’ commitment to character is unlike any other. It’s the movie that gave us “I drink your milkshake” in what can only be described as one of the best film endings. Add Paul Dano to the supporting cast and you have one of the best combinations of a director/writer and cast seen in 21st century film.
Phantom Thread (2017)
Day-Lewis’ “final” role sees him reunite with Paul Thomas Anderson as a renowned couturier, Reynolds Woodcock, inspired by a culimation of designers including Charles James. He’s a man with an inpenetrable exterior that is soon challenged by a chance encounter with waitress, Alma (Vicky Krieps) who becomes his muse when his creativity wanes. They spark a professional and romantic relationship and his business starts booming again as Reynolds finds his inspiration to design. Always watched over by his eagle-eyed sister, Cyril (Lesley Manville), we see the highs and lows of Reynolds’ career and the challenges he faces when the sparks begin to fade. The character contrasts greatly with the previous Anderson outing. Reynolds is a more subdued character who can say just as much with a simple grimace or flourish of the hand in the same way that Daniel Plainview used his persuasive chat to manipulate. Day-Lewis was deservedly nominated for the major awards in what is a beautiful swansong to a brilliant career.
As you can see, there are many brilliant performances that didn’t make the list, in particular In The Name of the Father (1993) and Lincoln (2012), the latter of which won him his third Best Actor gong. It’s always difficult choosing my favourite performances but how do you do it when pretty much every performance is perfect? There really is no wrong answer when it comes to Daniel Day-Lewis as it is likely that you will feel impacted by his performances.
Which film is your favourite from Daniel Day-Lewis? Let me know in the comments below!
Paul Thomas Anderson is known for his track record of spectacular films, never once making a bad film. His filmography includes breakthrough classics like 1997’s Boogie Nights and the iconic 2007 effort There Will Be Blood just to name a few. However, the one film that strikes a cord with me on a personal note is his 2012 star studded cult study The Master in which Joaquin Phoenix plays Freddie Quell, an alcholic, sex addicted ex-marine who struggles to adjust to normal life after World War II. After an unfortunate incident in which he arguably poisons and kills someone with a toxic alcoholic drink, he escapes and sneaks onto a boat that is currently home to members of The Cause, a cult ran by the titular character, also known as Lancaster Dodd (played superbly by Philip Seymour Hoffman). The Master was severely overlooked on release but has gained a reputation in recent years as one of the best films of the 21st century so far and deservedly so. With striking direction and a flawless screenplay, it’s a film that shows the plight to belong and find that place of belonging and where you fit in the world.
Directed and written by Paul Thomas Anderson, The Master is my favourite of his films and is his own personal favourite as well. With the direction having a keen focus on Freddie and his journey to self acceptance while refusing to fully conform to what The Cause expects from him, this is a film that is deep in manipulation and questionable motives. Anderson’s screenplay does a great job of providing the mystique behind The Master and what his motivations are when it comes to Freddie and bringing Freddie in to The Cause. It is halfway through when we find out his real name as the allure surrounding him begins to crumble and Freddie starts to see the reality of The Cause and how society actually views them.
Leading the cast is Joaquin Phoenix as Freddie Quell in what is a career best performance. A sex-addicted alcoholic veteran, Freddie is a deeply troubled character who deals with physical and mental illness whilst also being unable to adjust to regular society following the end of the Second World War. He is erratic and unpredictable, making him the perfect guinea pig for The Master’s new techniques. What Phoenix always does so well is really delve into his characters to a point where he can contort his physicality to become that character and we forget that we are watching an actor. Marking the first of two collaborations between Phoenix and Anderson (the second was 2014’s Inherent Vice), The Master was a perfect pairing for this highly intensive study into a character who seemingly has no place to belong.
In support we have Philip Seymour Hoffman as the titular character and Amy Adams as his wife, Peggy. Both deliver exceptional performances and were my top picks for their respective Acadeny Award categories. Hoffman’s performance has helped in making one of the best original characters put to screen. A quiet performance that is heavily layered, we don’t never fully understand why The Master acts the way he does or what his motivations are as his techniques are always changing. Touring the country and meeting followers, his reputation and inability to remain calm towards critics begins to surface and the mask begins to slip. Where Freddie doesn’t know where he belongs, The Master has created his own place of belonging and is determined to thrust his point of view and his agenda onto those who can be influenced, especially in high society.
One of the highlights in terms of the crew is the soundtrack which was composed by Anderson’s frequent collaborator, Jonny Greenwood. Having seen a lot of success for his score for There Will Be Blood, Greenwood takes inspiration from the 1940s and 50s period and incorporates instruments that are reminiscent of the marines such as woodwind which helps to elevate that atmosphere. We can see the film purely through the music because it helps to paint that picture.
Overall, what makes The Master such a brilliant film is the amount of detail that is in the direction and screenplay. The interpretative nature means that you can watch it and come to a conclusion then watch it again and come to an entirely different conclusion. It’s not an easy film to watch but the best films never are. Beautiful and poignant with a timeless quality, The Master is sure to go down as a classic in years to come.
What do you think of The Master? Let me know in the comments below!
