Tag: icon

Categories
Review

The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent (2022)

The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent is one of the most meta comedies to be released this year. The film serves as a tribute to the filmography and persona of iconic actor, Nicolas Cage. Over the years, Cage has garnered a reputation for his unique acting style that has often been parodied and discussed and The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent is a perfect response from the man himself. The film follows Cage playing a fictionalised version of himself who is offered $1 million to travel to Spain and attend billionaire Javi Gutierrez’s birthday party. Struggling to revitalise his career and maintain a relationship with his daughter, Cage soon finds himself in the middle of a major operation as CIA agents Vivian (Tiffany Haddish) and Martin (Ike Barinholtz) rely on Cage for intelligence.

Directed by Tom Gormican who cowrote the screenplay with Kevin Etten, The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent leans into everything we love about Nicolas Cage, even going as far as to include a version of Cage named “Nicky” that torments him about the direction his life has taken. The film acts as a retrospective of Cage’s vast filmography while also allowing Cage to showcase his talent thanks to the range that the role demands. The script may not be the most complex, but it doesn’t need to be as this film is all about the actor and his performance while also giving Pedro Pascal an opportunity to show that he is incredibly funny.

Nicolas Cage plays a fictionalised version of himself while also playing a hallucination that parodies an appearance Cage made on TV in the 1990s. His performance is quintessential Cage, bringing his signature charisma with a brilliant level of self-awareness, showcasing his passion for acting. What is fantastic about Cage’s performance is that it feels genuine and sincere in execution with plenty of nods and tributes to his extensive filmography. There are plenty of parodies and memes online surrounding Nicolas Cage and his performances, but it is often forgotten that the man is actually a brilliant actor and thay the charisma feeds into each of his performances, especially his action films of the 90s. Cage’s performance in The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent gives him the platform to show just how good an actor he is while equally feeding into the frenzy that surrounds him in popular culture.

In support, we have Pedro Pascal who plays billionaire Javi Gutierrez. Pascal has proven his dramatic skills, especially on TV with his performance in Game of Thrones still remaining a fan favourite even though he wasn’t in a lot of episodes. However, in The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent, Pascal shows that he is more than capable of pulling of a comical performance. Unpredictable and intense, Pascal feeds off Cage’s eccentric energy and the two make a great pair to watch throughout. What makes Pascal the perfect choice for the role is how likeable he is while also providing an intensity that works brilliantly against Cage’s eccentricity. It’s clear that Pascal is having a lot of fun in the role which makes it even more enjoyable to watch.

The score by Mark Isham plays into the action and feels reminiscent of Cage’s films from the 90s with a mix of fast-paced tracks to backdrop the chase scenes while slower and more dramatic tracks support the emotional moments between characters. The track “They Made You” is one of the highlights as it is filled with plenty of tension while also incorporating the Spanish guitar to reflect the film’s setting. Isham’s score works well as it fits the film perfectly while also leaning into Cage’s persona and filmography.

The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent is a wonderful celebration of Nicolas Cage and his unique charisma and acting style. However, the film isn’t simply a tribute to the star as it incorporates an intriguing storyline and a phenomenal turn by Pedro Pascal who has great chemistry with Cage throughout the film. With plenty of humour from beginning to end, there is also a thread of sincerity that brings an emotional weight to the film.

What did you think of The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent? Let me know in the comments below!

The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent is available to own on DVD and bluray!

Categories
Uncategorised

BFI Flare Festival 2021: Jump, Darling

BFI Flare Festival is all about showcasing the newest films that explore LGBT+ issues and the variety this year follows all paths of life from all corners of the globe. Opening the festival this year is Phil Connell’s Jump, Darling. The film follows Russell (Thomas Duplessie), a drag queen who moves back in with his grandmother, Margaret (Oscar winner Cloris Leachman) after his breakup. As Russell tries to decide what he wants to do with his life, he also finds himself taking care of Margaret who is reluctant to go into a care home despite her ailing health. The film was one of the last films Leachman starred in before she passed away earlier this year.

Connell’s screenplay and direction is nicely paced and he manages to get fully realised characters in its short 90 minute run. Despite the difference in lifestyles between Russell and Margaret, their similarities begin to show as both are trapped in their particular situations. Where Maragret is physically trapped as she is unable to leave the house, Russell is finding himself unable to fulfil his potential as a successful actor and feels the pressure of failure from family and friends. The scenes where Connell’s direction really shines is when Russell performs lip syncs as his drag alter ego, Fishy Falters. These scenes allow Connell to shift to a more experimental style of filmmaking as he mixes in differing camera angles and lighting that takes Russell out of his reality when he becomes Fishy Falters.

Duplessie is fantastic in the leading role as Russell and stands his own against Oscar winner Leachman. We first see Russell in a successful nightclub prepping for his drag debut as Fishy Falters. After stumbling on his way to the stage and leaving the club, he breaks up with his partner who thinks he is should pursue acting as he doesn’t think drag is a worthy career. When he moves in with his grandmother, we begin to see the clash between the two worlds that he seems to inhabit. Where Duplessie really shines is showing the difference between Russell’s life as a man who is trying to find his way versus his performances as the super confident drag queen, Fishy Falters. Duplessie’s stellar lip syncing is on par with the performances we see from professional drag Queens throughout the film.

As expected, Leachman is brilliantly cast as Margaret, the family matriarch who simply refuses to be put in a care home despite pressure from her daughter. Unable to drive or properly care for herself, Russell’s arrival brings a certain amount of freedom as Maragret begins to encounter old friends and start to find the joy in her life again. With Leachman having a stellar career playing strong women, Jump, Darling is no exception as we see Margaret grasping at the little control she has left. Wanting to cater to her grandson and encourage him to push out of his comfort zones, Margaret is quite a confrontational character but she also has a softer side when it comes to Russell. The scenes between Leachman and Duplessie are great to watch and even in her twilight years, Leachman shows that her star quality never went away.

One thing that I thought was particularly great in this film was the editing. Lev Lewis edits perfectly by utilising a more traditional cut in the scenes with the domestic troubles but then changing to a more exciting cut during the musical scenes. This helps to shift the genre of the film from drama to musical and keeps the film unpredictable and attentive. Lewis’ editing works perfectly to show the two worlds that Russell lives in and perfectly chronicles the emotional journey he takes.

Overall, Jump, Darling marks a great start to this year’s BFI Flare Festival and marks the start to a wonderful career for Duplessie whilst also being a lovely swansong for Hollywood icon, Leachman. Connell uses the minimalist surroundings and limited characters allows the two protagonists to shine and puts their acting at the centre. The chemistry between Duplessie and Leachman feels natural and the screenplay allows the relationship to develop naturally without resorting to any exposition. Jump, Darling is a film that will leave you laughing, crying and every other emotion in between.

Jump, Darling is opening the BFI Flare Festival.

Categories
Uncategorised

The Life Ahead (2020)

After a short break to celebrate Christmas, I am back with the awards season viewings. I hope everyone had a lovely time and got to spend it with the ones you love. My next review is all about a film that had much hype thanks to the comeback of the legendary Sophia Loren in this wonderful drama directed by her son, Edoardo Ponti. The Life Ahead stars Loren as Madame Rosa, an ex-prostitute and Holocaust survivor who takes in Momo (Ibrahima Gueye), a young Senegalese boy after he robs her in the street. With polar opposite backgrounds and an inability to see eye to eye initially, The Life Ahead explores the developing relationship and kinship between Rosa and Momo as they begin to find common ground.

The film itself is only 95 minutes with the screenplay written by Ponti and Ugo Chiti and is based on the novel, The Life Before Us by Romain Gary. Making the most of every second, we are immediately thrust into the robbery scene by way of a flashback after being introduced to Momo who has run and hidden from Madame Rosa’s friend, Lola (Abril Zamora) with no explanation. Rather than spoon feed the audience on who is who, we are naturally introduced to characters as the story develops. We are not given all the answers in terms of background but Ponti has brought a natural approach to his writing and directing.

Seeing Sophia Loren back on the silver screen is always a welcome presence. Having made her name during the Golden Age of Hollywood, Loren won her competitive Oscar in 1961 for her leading performance in Vittorio De Sica’s Two Women which is my all time favourite Lead Actress Oscar winning performance. If you haven’t seen Two Women then make sure you do as soon as you can. As the years have gone by, Loren has taken on fewer projects and The Life Ahead is her first big leading role since the early 2000s. Madame Rosa is a stern and hard woman who has survived the toughest of trials and tribulations. Living in a society where she has been ostracised and outcast, she has made herself an important staple of the community and it’s easy to see the positive impact she has, especially among those who struggle the most. Taking care of the children of prostitutes, Madame Rosa provides the support for others that she never had. Loren is revolutionary in the role and proves yet again why she is one of the best actresses of all time. Her range and ability is astonishing that completely dismisses any claim that she is nothing more than a sex symbol.

Newcomer Ibrahima Gueye is fantastic as troubled child, Momo. Struggling to find his own identity and inspiration, Momo is reluctant to move in with Madame Rosa as he fails to follow the rules initially. As he gets to know Rosa and her backstory, he begins to respect her and grows concerned when she begins to zone out and walk off. It’s not easy to act opposite a huge actress, especially one so renowned as Loren, especially if you are a newcomer but Gueye and Loren match perfectly and the friendship between them is nice to see. Gueye really holds his own as Momo is faced with his own demons, tangled in the world of drugs and learning to understand how the real world works. It is the character’s innocence mixed with Rosa’s life where the two are able to find that common ground and grow a friendship. The same could be said from the acting perspective as Gueye is a newcomer combined with Loren and it is the performances and the scenes between them that elevate the film overall.

Some reviewers have commented on the formulaic quality of the film but I actually like the simplicity of the structure and layout. When working with someone as legendary as Loren, it allows the performance to breathe and grow without becoming overwhelmed by a complex narrative. The Life Ahead is one of my highlights of the year because it feels timeless and integral at the same time. The interweaving issues of religion and identity are discussed at length without being brought forth in a clunky manner seen in a lot of films. Loren lets us feel Madame Rosa’s pain through her acting rather than through words and it is this that makes it one of the most subtle and beautiful performances of the year.

What did you think of The Life Ahead? Let me know in the comments below!

The Life Ahead is available to watch on Netflix now!

Categories
Uncategorised

Judy (2019)

Based on the last years and concerts of Judy Garland’s life, Judy is one of the most talked about films going into this awards season thanks to the starring turn by Renée Zellweger in the titular role. Biopics have always been a popular go-to for actors who want to subvert casting types and show their range and this seems to be no exception for Zellweger who foregoes her famed reputation as the comedic gem in Bridget Jones. As an avid fan of Judy Garland, I was really interested to see whether Zellweger pulls it off and it truly is a film that revolves around the performance and acts as an Oscar lull for the actress who has mainly stayed out of the spotlight for years. Directed by Rupert Goold, a director renowned for his theatre work with a script written by Tom Edge based on the musical The End of the Rainbow by Peter Quilter, Judy is the heartbreaking reality of a faded star who longs to stay in the spotlight but is plighted by a lifetime of abuse which finally catches up with her in the form drug and alcohol abuse. Flashbacks to her youth which see Darci Shaw play a young Garland (superbly I might add) in which she is constantly berated for her appearance whilst also experiencing harassment, forced drug use and general anxieties in terms of how she must eat and act at all times.

Goold’s direction is intensely focused on its star. When we see Judy perform for the first time, the camera never leaves her, instead focusing on each movement and mannerism that Zellweger conjures up. There is a distinct use of palette used in the film as the Hollywood scenes of Judy’s youth are bright and playful whereas the London setting for her concerts in the present day is darker and drearier. The illusion of fame has long since faded which Goold brings across. The decision to bring in events that didn’t happen in real life is something that I am unsure about. A life as eventful as Judy Garland’s isn’t in need of any fictionalisation and I feel that the inclusion of these scenes detracts from the film. The main fictionalised event was the inclusion of gay couple, Dan (Andy Nyman) and Stan (Daniel Cerqueira) who wait for Judy at the stage door and have dinner with her in their flat. I understand the inclusion of these characters as it is a way to show Judy’s support for the gay community and the performances from Nyman and Cerqueira are heartfelt and sincere. My only concern is the ending scene in which they start a singalong to “Over the Rainbow” when Judy breaks down on stage. This event didn’t happen and the effect that it had as the theatre audience all joined in made it a bit cringey to watch, knowing that this didn’t happen in reality. Judy’s longing to be remembered and her final lines do pack a punch though as you feel the impending fate that awaits her as she dies 6 months after the concerts. There are plenty of moments in the film, particularly the Hollywood scenes, that are fantastically shot and Goold’s experience as a theatre director comes into play. His focus on the character’s expressions and use of light and shade is phenomenal and it’s exciting to see what he picks as his next cinematic project.

judy4

Now onto the star of the show. Renée Zellweger is nothing less than stellar as Judy. The Judy she plays is one that looks back on past fame and fortune whilst dealing with the reality that she does not have the same financial luxury or influence she once did. The only way she is able to keep herself financially afloat is by performing in London where her fan base is loyal. Garland is a character with many layers and Zellweger manages to communicate this with a melancholy glance. The physicality of the role may not seem demanding at first but particularly when performing, you see the physical struggles Judy has. Zellweger’s Judy is one who cares about her impact and legacy, wanting to ensure that she will be remembered. Her motivation is ensuring financial security so she can spend time with her children who are living in the US with their father, Judy’s ex-husband Sidney Luft (Rufus Sewell). There are so many scenes that are captivating and it’s mainly when she is on stage. The passion that Zellweger throws into the role is spilled out heart and soul into the songs. Offstage, Judy is disabled by her mental health and increased alcohol consumption. Her anxiety overrides everything causing a huge lack of confidence and yet she longs for validation and the applause. Her refusal to allow her younger children to enter the world of showbiz only demonstrates the hatred for her own upbringing and eventual rise to stardom. She longs for the normal life but can never truly have one now.

The supporting cast is led by Michael Gambon and Jessie Buckley as theatre owner, Bernard Delfont and assistant Rosalyn Wilder, respectively. It’s always nice to see veteran actors acting alongside rising stars and both do a wonderful job. At the end of the day, their roles are to support Zellweger’s starring turn. This is a film that has an intense focus on Judy. There are very few scenes that don’t have Judy in them meaning that this makes it hard for other people to truly shine because she does grab the attention. But as I said, in a film like this, we’re not meant to focus on these supporting roles. That being said, there is a scene between Judy and Rosalyn that is particularly fiery when the latter tries to encourage the former to go onstage. Judy lashes out and claims that Rosalyn doesn’t care about her which to an extent is true. She may seem that she does care but at the end of the day, Judy’s wellbeing comes second to her concerts. Rosalyn’s job is to ensure that Judy makes the concerts on time.

judy-garland-renee-zellweger.jpg

Judy is a film with its flaws but much like the film’s subject, it certainly puts on a show. Zellweger has made herself a serious contender this awards season and definitely could walk away with Oscar number two. I think it’s a film worth watching just for the performance but the direction should not be overlooked either. In a post #metoo world, it’s horrific and tragic to see how Judy was treated from a young age as she was verbally and physically abused and forced to fit an ideal that she did not naturally conform to. She clearly despised and reviled any attempts to change her and yet was forced to hate her background. Comparing the two Judys we see in the film, we see that culmination of abuse from all angles in Zellweger’s.

What did you think of Judy? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Spirited Away (2001)

One of the big ones to come out of Studio Ghibli and with good reason, Spirited Away follows protagonist Chihiro who finds herself in the spirit world where her parents have been turned into pigs. Chihiro must work under the ruthless Yubaba in a bathhouse for spirits where she is forced to take care of the visiting spirits, including the mysterious No-Face. With the help of a young boy called Haku, Chihiro navigates her way around the land of spirits and eventually learns more about herself and what she is capable of in order to return to the human world with her parents. This is commonly seen as Miyazaki’s opus as it brought international acclaim the studio hadn’t experienced before as well as a slew of awards such as the Academy Award for Best Animated Feature. The story of identity and place is one that resonated with the critical commercial audiences and has made Spirited Away an instant classic. In true Miyazaki style, the film is enjoyable for all ages and can be watched time and time again and still be just as rewarding. The film has you laughing, crying and grimacing as we encounter various characters and are thrust into the unknown. 

Ten year old Chihiro is forced to move away as her dad starts a new job. Unhappy about the move, we are first introduced to her as she sulks in the car with a bouquet gifted by her classmates. Chihiro is soon forced to think beyond her years to navigate a way out of the spirit world with her parents. She is a character who finds her own strength and relies on herself to figure this out. On entering the Bathhouse, Chihiro is overwhelmed by all of the creatures but is soon tasked with carrying out there needs. The Stink Spirit is the breakthrough moment as Chihiro passes the test and understands what the spirit needs. Anothe protagonist is dragon/river spirit Haku, who initially takes form as a boy Chihiro’s age. Haku immediately sees Chihiro and helps disguise her from other spirits before she is given permission to reside in the spirit world. At the top of the bathhouse lives Yubaba, a witch who runs the facilities. After failing Chihiro off, she strips Chihiro off her name and gives her the identity Sen. Soon enough Chihiro becomes Sen and forgets who she is as she is enveloped in the spirit world. By losing herself, she loses sight of the mission to get home. Yubaba is a character who has no motive to act for or against Chihiro and simply allows Chihiro to work in the bathhouse while she goes on her journey of self-discovery.

spiritedaway

The animation is spectacular is on a level that hasn’t been seen before and not really since (The Tale of the Princess Kaguya being another great example). A beautiful mix of Japanese folklore and fantasy, Spirited Away makes use of the scenery and locations. By setting the film in a fantasy universe, it gives the animation team an unlimited scope in design and allows Miyazaki to create a world from scratch. Not only is Miyazaki creating his own version of the spirit world but it also offering an entirely unique perspective on various aspects of Japanese culture. The whole film is crammed full of amazing sequences but among the most iconic in Ghibli history has to be Chihiro running through the garden paths surrounded by rose bushes is simple yet dreamy. It’s only a short moment but the angles and colours are perfect as Chihiro anticipates seeing her parents.  Other brilliantly crafted scenes include the food feast where Chihiro’s parents are turned into pigs. The satisfying layout of the food contrasts with the disgusting design for both her parents when they’re eating the food and consequently the design of the pigs themselves. The detail of the creases in the skin and the sweat is disgusting but then Ghibli isn’t a studio that glosses over the grotesque.

I can’t review a Ghibli film and not discuss the music. The score from Joe Hisaishi is instantly his most recognisable to date, spanning thousands of covers on YouTube and being a prominent inclusion in his concerts. The soundtrack is nothing less than stunning and totally deserving of its praise. The opening number and the main track associated with the film, “One Summer’s Day”, contains a mix of melancholy and hope. It’s slowness reflects the sadness that Chihiro feels about leaving her old life behind but it’s still uplifting and hopeful at the same time. The piece is soft and pretty and immediately brings you into Chihiro’s world. As soon as we enter the spirit world, the score completely shifts. The peaceful slowness is soon replaced with harsh brass and a quickened pace as Chihiro becomes an outsider in a new place and is forced to hide. Tracks such as “The Dragon Boy” are filled with the grandeur that lives up to Spirited Away’s epic feel. Hisaishi’s score helps to transport the audience into Miyazaki’s universe.

haku

A film like Spirited Away doesn’t come often with direction and writing that is filled with such love and passion for storytelling. Miyazaki outdid himself with this one and it’s a film that will go down in history. There are an array of supporting characters who all bring significance, even if it’s a small payoff such as Yubaba’s henchmen or her baby. You could watch this film a million times and still find something new. The film opens itself up for interpretation and analysis and has been widely discussed as such. Scenes that I find particularly striking include the attack on Haku as he thrashes into Chihiro’s dorm bloodied and weak and the scene in which Chihiro is sat on the train. The latter is so still and peaceful that it brings a sigh of relief and calm in a film that has brought so much chaos.

Do you love Spirited Away as much as I do? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Castle in the Sky (1986)

Hayao Miyazaki’s 1986 family action film, Castle in the Sky was the first film made under the Studio Ghibli brand (Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind was made before Ghibli’s inception although it is now included in the Ghibli catalogue). The film follows young orphan Pazu who catches a girl, Sheeta, after she falls from the sky and their mission to find the mysterious floating island of Laputa. Running up against pirates, the army and government, Pazu and Sheeta are thrust into a world full of corruption, greed and the abuse of nature. The world is crumbling thanks to the adults and it takes their childlike view to right the wrongs. On one level, the film is an engaging action movie that features extensive chase scenes and a variety of exciting locations. On a deeper level, the film can be explored as an analytical portrayal of mankind’s war on nature and the importance of working with nature and not fighting it.

What Ghibli achieves brilliantly in all of its films is that the films are never patronising to the audience. There is always something to think about. Even the child-friendly films like My Neighbor Totoro include undercurrent themes of death and loss. With Castle in the Sky, we are following two protagonists who don’t have families of their own but are there for each other throughout. That in itself is a hard fact to swallow as the characters are barely 10 years old and yet they survive with no complaints in this corrupt universe. When thinking of the most iconic Ghibli films, it’s easy to think of the likes of My Neighbour Totoro, Whisper of the Heart and of course the Oscar-winning Spirited Away, but I think somewhere Castle in the Sky has been lost in the conversation. There is something about this film that centres of the childlike vision that Ghibli likes to explore but blurs the lines by incorporating flawed heros and insightful dialogue. Every time I watch this film, I feel equally inspired and affected as the passion behind this film is impossible to ignore.

laputa2

Aside from the two protagonists, there are several parties who aim to find Laputa first. A group of pirates led by matriarch Captain Dola who is a fantastic character. The only female on the ship that includes her husband and multiple sons, Dola smashes the patriarchy and in many ways is a more fearing character than the actual villains. The pirates’ encounter with Pazu and Sheeta shows that they are not your typical blood and guts pirates as the film want you to believe but show that they do have a heart. Although I do prefer to watch the Japanese original with subtitles, I do have to mention the voicework of Cloris Leachman in the English dub. She becomes Dola and gives the character this commanding quality with an undertone of softness that makes the shift in storyline believable. On the other hand, we have Muska, a government agent who is consumed by the idea of power that he is willing to betray all those who work for him to climb to the top. Initially, Muska seems rational and good-natured but his plans are soon revealed as he plans to use Laputa as a military weapon of destruction.

The animation is spectacular and sets the standards for Ghibli films of the future. Incorporating a steampunk aesthetic with classic anime styles, Castle in the Sky becomes an oxymoron in scenery. It is so clearly an alternate universe but not wholly outlandish. The world the film inhabits could be described as a grounded fantasy. This could be because the issues explored in the film are very real issues but through the metaphor of Laputa, a physically and figuratively detached land that represents a country before military invasion. One recurring feature in Ghibli films is the satisfying attention to detail such as the intricate blades of grass, beautiful colour mixtures and palettes and food that makes your mouth water. There are so many beautiful aspects in this film but the most stunning creation has to be the robot and particularly, the robot who lives among the natural world within Laputa. It’s a contrast that flows together seamlessly and has formed one of Ghibli’s most recognisable icons.

My favourite part of any Ghibli film is by far the score and in particular, the scores composed by Joe Hisaishi. I would class Hisaishi as an unsung hero in Ghibli history as his music encompass the magical qualities that the films possess. The music for Castle in the Sky is no different and in fact ranks highly for my all-time favourite scores. Each character has their own unique piece of music and even the crystal has a distinctive piano run that sounds like a twinkling star. Every piece is beautifully crafted but for me, the highlight of this tremendous achievement is the track that follows the Forgotten Robot when Pazu and Sheeta arrive at Laputa. The track is haunting yet full of hope and keeps qualities of the Laputian themed music that has been featured up this point. In the dub, there were improvements and additional tracks included that elevate the experience even more although the original Japanese is still just as beautiful. The music overall is classic and traditional in style until we get to moments of conflict were synthesizers are included and bring a more fantastical element into the mix. The soundtrack reflects the themes of the film.

castle0434.jpg

Picking a highlight scene is difficult for this film because I find it so captivating throughout but in a situation where I am forced to choose, it would be Pazu and Sheeta’s entry into Laputa. Entering the vortex in their tiny glider, they venture into the eye of the hurricane and are forced to endure heavy thunder and lightning. It’s an exhilarating scene to watch as the traditional scenery is stripped away and makes way for a black background with flashes of purples and white. The audience is taken to a different realm and it is reflected in the quick change in pacing, music and perspective as the glider becomes even smaller among giant lightning strikes. It’s a brilliant scene that is then beautifully contrasted with the sudden break as they float down to Laputa and everything seems back to normal. The angry and defensive nature of the weather is a representation of Laputa hiding itself behind the mask and reputation it has gained as a weapon.

What do you think of Castle in the Sky? Which Ghibli film is your favourite? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Quentin Tarantino: Film Ranking

If you asked a group of people for their favourite living filmmaker, there is a strong chance that a large percentage of them will say the name: Quentin Tarantino. One of the greatest and most original minds to come out of the film industry in the history of film, Tarantino practically defined 90s cinema with his look into the gangster underworld of Los Angeles. His films are known for their strong use of language, gratuitous violence and the iconic writing style that Tarantino brings to his dialogue. The owner of two Best Original Screenplay Oscars (for Pulp Fiction and Django Unchained), he has yet to win a Best Director gong. With the release of this year’s Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, could this be another successful awards season for Tarantino?

Tarantino had always stated that he intended to make 10 features. Counting Kill Bill as one, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood would be his ninth and, therefore, penultimate picture. I thought it would be a great celebration of his work to revisit his films old and new and see how I would stack them up when compared to each other.

Here are the reviews for the films of Quentin Tarantino:

Reservoir Dogs (1992)

Possibly one of the most (if not the most) iconic debuts ever to be delivered by a filmmaker, Reservoir Dogs follows a group of men who are given colour code names such as Mr. Orange and Mr. Brown and their attempt to carry out a diamond heist. A pretty simple plot but the genius of the film comes from Tarantino’s decision to not show the heist itself. What we are presented with is the run-up to the heist and it’s consequences when it goes wrong. Featuring a brilliant cast including Harvey Keitel, Michael Madsen and Tim Roth. My favourite performance comes from Steve Buscemi who plays the fearfully paranoid Mr. Pink. Among the men, Pink is clearly the outsider from the beginning when he refuses to give the waitress a tip. The script may seem simple but it is anything but. There is a rhythm and style that would come to define a Tarantino feature such as extensive allegories and numerous pop culture references. The soundtrack for this film has also become somewhat of a legend in its own right and has become a reference point for a lot of modern filmmakers. Tarantino himself claims that this film is the closest to being a “perfect” film which although I see the argument for, I would say that he has managed to make even better films. It would be a shame to think that his first film was his best.

Pulp Fiction (1994)

If you had to say one film that defines the 1990s, I think the majority of people would say Pulp Fiction. From the iconic poster design, extreme violence and brilliant dialogue, Pulp Fiction catapulted Tarantino to the top of the A list, winning him the Palme d’Or at Cannes Film Festival as well as an Academy Award for Best Original Screenplay. Starring John Travolta and Samuel L. Jackson as suave hitmen Vincent Vega and Jules Winnifield who work for drug lord Marsellus Wallace (Ving Rhames) and his cocaine-addicted wife, Mia (Uma Thurman in her most recognisable role). Pulp Fiction is bigger and better than its predecessor with an even more starry cast, bigger budget and killer direction. Even 25 years on, it is still commonly referenced for its costumes and standout scenes such as Jules’ biblical recitation before blowing the brains out of a man who attempted to double-cross Wallace. It is undoubtedly Jackson who is the shining star of this gangster masterpiece as he brings his trademark attitude. You know you did a great job when the person who beat you to the Oscar says that you should have won. There’s a reason why Pulp Fiction marked the start of the iconic collaborations between Tarantino and Jackson. Their love of action, violence and strong language makes the perfect pairing. Besides every time Jackson is onscreen, my favourite scene is Christopher Walken’s iconic monologue as Captain Koons, an Army veteran who survived the war and is gifting his son, Butch (Chandler Lindauer and Brue Willis playing the younger and older versions, respectively) his prized watch. Only Walken could deliver the monologue with the sincerity and conviction that his does.

Jackie Brown (1997)

Jackie Brown is one of those films that finds itself among the top of people’s favourite Tarantino films or worst. Sadly, it is among the bottom of my list but not because it is a bad film by any means. It is simply because of its nature as an adaptation. When I watch a Tarantino, I want to see the usual quirks in the dialogue which I think isn’t there as much as other films. Following Pam Grier as the titular air stewardess who becomes embroiled in a smuggling scandal, Tarantino relies on a great cast to carry out this complex web and pulls it off which include Samuel L. Jackson with a fantastic haircut. Known for her starring roles in Blaxploitation flicks, Grier herself is amazing and had such a powerful presence onscreen. She doesn’t just give a great performances, she becomes Jackie. It’s one of my favourite performances in the Tarantino catalogue but I just feel that there are elements such as the odd pacing that let the film as a whole down. It would be nice to see Tarantino reunite with Grier on a new project, perhaps his 10th (and supposedly last) feature. The film is grounded in reality a bit more than the others and I think the fact that any director could have made this film is why it ranks low. When I watch a Tarantino film, I want it to be distinctively Tarantino but I don’t get that from this film and as previously stated, I think that comes from the fact that it is an adaptation. The man thrives from his originality and it’s what the audience loves.

Kill Bill: Volume 1 (2003)

I remember watching Kill Bill for the first time and being blown away by the strength of the protagonist. The film follows the vengeful ex-assassin The Bride who seeks revenge on her former colleagues when they kill her wedding rehearsal party on the orders of Bill, the man who runs the group. Kill Bill is intended to be watched as one film but due to running length was divided into two volumes. The first volume is seen as the Eastern installment as The Bride ventures to Japan to face the first assassin O-Ren Oshii (Lucy Liu). There are so many reasons why my love for this film is unequivocal such as the clear appreciation for Japanese cinema and culture, the amazing use of animation within the film and most of all, the wide abundance of fleshed out female characters. This film is known for its extreme violence and high body count but don’t let this put you off. Playing the woman who lost everything, including her unborn baby, Thurman’s performance is undeniably ruthless, unapologetic and emotionally charged to the max. Even though she seems unbreakable and unemotional on the surface but you sense her pain underneath the surface from the opening scene with Vernita Green (Vivica A. Fox). Tarantino uses various elements such as sound mixing and colour giving the film its flamboyance and elevating it beyond realism and into fantasy.

Kill Bill: Volume 2 (2004)

Following on from Vol 1, Kill Bill: Vol 2 takes us back to America where the Bride has the second half of her list left to kill in the form of Bill’s failure of a brother, Budd (Michael Madsen), the merciless Elle Driver (Daryl Hannah) and Bill himself (David Carradine). This installment has a larger focus on the Bride’s background before the massacre took place and her journey to becoming an assassin. I love how both films have become a genre of their own. The body count may be a fraction of its predecessor but it still includes some of the most terrifying scenes in film (insert buried alive segment here) and is captivating in its own way. We see the Bride’s emotional journey and her guard slips as she makes some unexpected discoveries in her quest for blood. I think that together, Kill Bill makes for a fantastic saga and would definitely be among my favourite films of the 21st century so far.

Death Proof (2007)

I know there are some people that wouldn’t put Death Proof in the list due to it being part of a two-part feature titled Grindhouse with fellow director and friend, Robert Rodriguez directing Planet Terror (2007). Death Proof is a Texan action led by Kurt Russell as a stuntman who murders women with his car. The film is split into two parts with one group of women’s fates determined the first half and another group in the second half. Death Proof is often viewed as Tarantino’s worst and it is but it’s not a bad film. It is entertaining and Russell is brilliant as the killer in the “death-proof” car. It’s not as complex as other Tarantino films and doesn’t perhaps have the gumption or wow factor that the others have. That being said, for what it wants to be, it delivers in spades. The soundtrack is great and Rose McGowan and Mary Elizabeth Winstead are great in their roles as Pam and Lee, respectively. It’s pretty great that Tarantino and Rodriguez cast McGowan in a leading role in both films to spite Harvey Weinstein for what he did to her. McGowan shines in both films and it would be great to see her make a return to films in roles as amazing as the Grindhouse duo.

Inglourious Basterds (2009)

The first Tarantino film I watched and boy was it a great pick. Undoubtedly one of the best opening scenes in film history, Tarantino manages to create tension with a glass of milk. The film is a reimagining of Nazi-occupied France during the war with Brad Pitt playing Aldo Raine who leads a group of men known as “The Basterds” who are set on killing Nazis and collecting their scalps. Inglourious Basterds also includes what I would argue is Tarantino’s best character today in the erringly charismatic SS Officer, Hans Landa. Played spectacularly by Christoph Waltz in a role that would see him in his Hollywood breakthrough and take home every Supporting Actor Award including the Cannes Film Festival, BAFTA and the Academy Award. Landa is a character who commands your attention. He’s despicable and manipulative, the sociopathic changes are intriguing to watch such as him loving his nickname “Jew Hunter” in the opening scene when intimidating a local farmer, to despising the name when realising that the Nazis are set on losing the war. His motives and outlook can never be understood because he is such a whirlwind character. He seems to take his job seriously one moment then not at all the next and flits the fate of others with ease, not finding it difficult to kill if he sees fit. I don’t think there’s a character that has unsettled a global audience as much as Hans Landa has and yet you long for him to be on the screen because the character is so engaging. Tarantino’s screenwriting is possibly his best, which he clearly knows from the final frame when Aldo looks into the camera and says “this might be my masterpiece”.

Django Unchained (2012)

Bringing his love for spaghetti westerns to the frontline for this Civil War epic, Tarantino’s 3 hour Django Unchained follows Jamie Foxx as the titular character and his quest to find his wife Broomhilda (Kerry Washington) in the Deep South were slavery is very much a thriving business. With the help of bounty hunter Dr King Schultz (Christoph Waltz), Django’s adventure sees Tarantino using an endless amount of fake blood and a controversial multitude of n-words throughout which faced criticism from individuals such as Spike Lee. I do think this is a film plagued with indulgence and excess in its violence, language and numerous endings but it does have very strong points. The cast are perfect in their roles particularly Christoph Waltz as Schultz and Leonardo DiCaprio as plantation owner Calvin Candie. Waltz is charismatic and charming as a man set on freeing slaves and hunting killers and would go on to win a second Best Supporting Actor gong although I personally think his role is a lead not supporting performance. DiCaprio’s performance on the other side is chilling and captivating as he relishes in torturing the slaves.

The Hateful Eight (2015)

Concluding the western trilogy in Tarantino’s catalogue, we venture to Wyoming in the aftermath of the Civil War. There’s a heavy blizzard and eight murderous brutes are trapped in Minnie’s Haberdashery including the honourable John “The Hangman” Ruth (Kurt Russell), country hunter Major Marquis Warren (Samuel L. Jackson) and a career-best from Jennifer Jason Leigh as the disgustingly brilliant Daisy Domergue who John is bringing to Red Rock to hang. Like all Tarantino films, this one is also a mash-up of genres. It is primarily western but is also murder mystery, comedy and thriller. The film’s composer, Ennio Morricone stated that he wrote the score for a horror film which would end up being the film’s strongest point and leading to Morricone’s long-awaited Oscar. It’s a truly brilliant soundtrack and elevates the rhythm of the dialogue which is so important in the moments of extreme tension. Tarantino’s writing is tight and every character has been fleshed out, admittedly some more than others, but each one is memorable in their own way. It’s an interesting inclusion and the film shows a maturity in Tarantino’s filmmaking. There is violence, granted, as expected but Tarantino is more focused on his script and positioning of characters than the actual violence.

Once Upon a Time in Hollywood (2019)

I have already written an extensive review on this one (which you can read here) so I won’t go into too much detail. What I will say is that it has a very good chance of scoring some nominations and potential wins going into awards season. It’s nice seeing Tarantino returning to California for his penultimate film and it seems like a film that he was destined to make. The personal touches are definitely here in what seems to be a return to the place where he grew up.

So we’re all up to date and I eagerly await to see what Tarantino has up his sleeve for his tenth and supposed final feature. Undoubtedly, it will be one of the biggest events in film history with actors and crew members alike clambering at the chance to work with him. There’s only one Tarantino and there certainly won’t be another director like him again.

With all that said and done, here is my final ranking:

1) Kill Bill: Volume 1 (2003)

2) Inglourious Basterds (2009)

3) Reservoir Dogs (1992)

4) Pulp Fiction (1994)

5) Kill Bill: Volume 2 (2004)

6) Once Upon a Time in Hollywood (2019)

7) The Hateful Eight (2015)

8) Django Unchained (2012)

9) Jackie Brown (1997)

10) Death Proof (2007)

I know it’s probably shocking having Kill Bill: Volume 1 at the top, but there is something incredibly empowering to me seeing a female character leading a blockbuster four hour saga. I hope people refer back to this when people claim that audiences don’t want to see women in film.

Which Tarantino is your favourite? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Disneyland Paris – November 2019

sdr_HDRB

Obviously, my blog focuses on the wonderful world of film but I thought that I would take a “half break” and write a post all about my time at the happiest place on Earth. Disneyland Paris is situated outside the city with the Eurostar station located right outside the Disney Village entrance. This was my third time going after previous visits in 2003 and 2016 but this one would prove to be the most successful in terms of rides (the 2016 trip saw several major ride closures) and also FINALLY meeting Snow White which if you know me or read this blog is a big deal. But that is all to come later. We arrived on Monday 4th November and departed Wednesday 6th November which was perfect because a) the park is barely busy and b) we got a chance to see both Halloween and Christmas decorations. Rather than go through the holiday day by day, I thought it would be good to talk about my experiences collectively. It’s hard to talk about one day without talking about another.

We stayed at the Sequoia Lodge Hotel which resembles a forest cabin with decoration inspired by Bambi. Our room was part of the Golden Forest section meaning that we had our own check-in desk and an exclusive lounge where we have breakfast. The room was beautiful as expected and sleeping in the bed was like being inside a giant marshmallow. We struggled to choose between the VIP Golden Forest room at the Sequoia Lodge or a standard room at the Newport Bay Club but what convinced us to go for Golden Forest was the easiness of not waiting for check-in or luggage transfers as we collected it and dropped it off at the counter. Also, being able to start the day in a peaceful and spacious room with no queues for food meant that we could go at our own pace and feel relaxed.

So where to begin? Well, perhaps I should start with the experience of the parks as a whole. As expected, walking into the main park on arrival was incredible as you are greeted by smiles and joyful music that runs through the park. Since we came at the short period between Halloween and Christmas, it did mean that the main square was closed so no lovely photos of the iconic Walt Disney and Mickey statue but that didn’t take away for the always breathtaking view of Main Street as it leads down to Sleeping Beauty’s Castle which acts as a centre point for the park and serves as a handy guide for where to go next. We visited the main park on all three days and Hollywood Studios on days 2 and 3 and the lack of queue times meant we were able to go on the rides more than once which was super handy. This was surprising since two of the biggest rides, The Rock’n’Roller Coaster and Crush’s Coaster in Hollywood Studios were closed for refurbishment. This did not affect the queues for other rides as the longest we waited was 20 minutes for Les Voyage de Pinocchio ride.

The best part about Disney parks is that there is no shortage of things to do. If you’re not fond of rides, you will still find enjoyment in the walkthrough attractions such as the dragon that lies beneath the castle. There is so much detail in the park and Easter eggs for the most obscure films (the Eurostar station has images from Return to Neverland above the luggage pickup kiosks) which is nice to see.

Luckily, my partner, Adam, and I absolutely LOVE rides so we went on as many as we could and because the park was at a low capacity, we were able to go on the rides multiple times. We went on:

Big Thunder Mountain x4

Phantom Manor x4

Star Wars Hyperspace Mountain x4

Blanche-Neige et les Sept Nains (Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs) x3

Peter Pan’s Flight x3

Pirates of the Carribbean x3

Ratatouille: The Adventure x3

The Twilight Zone: Tower of Terror x3

Le Pays des Contes de Fées (The Land of Fairy Tales) x2

Buzz Lightyear Laser Blast x1

It’s a Small World x1

Le Labyrinthe d’Alice (also known as Alice’s Curious Labyrinth) x1

RC Racer x1

Les Voyage de Pinocchio x1

That brings the total times we were on a ride to 34 which averages just over 11 rides a day. Overall, we walked around 60,000 steps over the course of the three days which is equivalent to approximately 25.92 miles. That’s just shy of the length of a marathon! Needless, to say our feet are hurting a lot from the walking but it was worth it and more.

My favourite ride in the parks is Blanche-Neige et les Sept Nains of course. I love the older rides that take you through the stories. They are simple but also bring that sense of nostalgia back. Of course, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs is my favourite film and this ride encapsulates all of the emotions that the film makes you feel. The animatronics and audio is fantastic and the set design is brilliant. I get chills every time the Evil Queen turns from the mirror and is revealed to be the Hag. I have been on this ride in previous visits so it was from far the first time I have been on it. One of my favourite memories from this holiday was when we were waiting in the Fast Pass queue for Peter Pan’s Flight (which was always ridiculously busy!) and we met a lovely cast member called Manon who also shares a love for Snow White. She kindly gifted us a special fast pass to go back on Blanche-Neige et les Sept Nains and also gave us an autograph book and keyrings of our choice. It made our holiday even more magical and was a wonderful surprise!

My favourite ride that I have not been on was by far Ratatouille: The Adventure. I must admit, I am not a big fan of simulator rides, mainly due to a horrific experience on the Back to the Future ride in Universal Orlando as a child. However, I cannot recommend this ride enough. Ratatouille: The Adventure is exclusive to Disneyland Paris and is a bilingual treat as you sit in a rat car and are thrust into the hectic set of a Michelin kitchen. The use of props and elements like water splashes when a mop is swept towards you really immerse you as you follow Remy’s quest to create the perfect dish. If you have not been on this ride, you need to go on it next time you visit Disneyland Paris.

Another nostalgic treat for me was Le Pays des Contes de Fées, a slow voyage across some of Disney’s greatest story retellings from classics like The Little Mermaid and Aladdin to more obscure offerings such as Pierre et le Loup (Peter and the Wolf) and Oz La Cité d’Émeraude (released in English as Return to Oz) which was a lovely surprise to see at the end of the ride as it was one of my favourite films growing up. I think rides like this are not only enjoyed by everyone but also highlight why people love Disney.

This was my fourth time going to a Disney Park (I went to Walt Disney World Resort in Orlando in 2001 and Disneyland Paris in 2003 and 2016) and on none of these occasions was I able to meet Snow White herself. I was disheartened when the City Hall assistant informed that she would only be making an appearance in the parade on day 2 and accepted that I would not be meeting her this time. However, an impulsive relax on a break would prove genius in the afternoon because low and behold there was Snow White on her way to host a meet and greet. I cannot even begin to explain how emotional this was for me. I have just turned 26 and this event had me feeling the most excited I have ever felt. It was my ultimate Disney dream come true and true enough, it was amazing. She took her time with everyone which was lovely to see and took as many pictures as you wanted. She loved my custom-made Snow White themed ears and even spoke Welsh which was amazing since Wales is often overlooked in Disney’s portrayal of Britain (It’s a Small World does not have a Welsh section sadly). She also promised to bake me a gooseberry pie which was great because who doesn’t love pie?

Leaving was horrible as expected. Even though we had done everything that we wanted to do, we still wanted to stay longer. We’ve already started planning our next Disney trip to either Walt Disney World Resort in Orlando or Disneyland in California and hopefully we won’t wait another four years before going on a big holiday.

Have you been to Disneyland Paris or any of the other Disney parks? Let me know about your experience in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

The Red Shoes (1948)

This technicolour wonderland is one of the best (if not the best!) film in the history of British cinema. Directed by Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger, It’s become known as a masterpiece and is constantly an inspiration for many artists alike and with good reason. Following Victoria Page (Moira Shearer), a ballerina who joins a troupe as the lead in the new ballet The Red Shoes. She begins to find a conflict between her professional relationship with the insufferable genius, Boris Lermontov (Anton Walbrook) and a personal romantic relationship with the troupe’s composer, Julian Craster (Marius Goring). Soon enough, the ballet of The Red Shoes begins to seep into Victoria’s reality and she is eventually broken down by the idealisations that are expected of her. This is a film that breaks the boundaries of the filmmaking experience. It’s very premise of the ballet within the reality of the film soon becomes blurred and the tone of the film changes from a basic aspirational drama to a psychological thriller. Inspired by the Hans Christian Anderson fairytale but given an original makeover by The Archers (as Powell and Pressburger were collectively known), this film delves into the dark side that fairytales ventured into which is a contrast to the Disney films that were dominating the global market. Even 70 years on, the topics in the film feel just as relevant today.

The Archers’ brilliant direction and script effectively contrast the freedom of dance with the claustrophobia and obsession with perfection. Nothing sums this film up more perfectly than Vicky and Boris’ first exchange:

Lermontov: Why do you want to dance?

Vicky: Why do you want to live?

Lermontov: Well, I don’t know exactly why, er, but I must.

Vicky: That’s my answer too.

red_002after.jpg

Dancing gives Vicky the freedom that she craves but unbeknownst to her in the beginning that the freedom she “gains” from dancing for Lermontov is merely his vision. He is the puppet master pulling the strings. As Vicky grows closer to Julian and begins to finesse her own skills, she begins to resist and she finds herself no longer wanting to dance but unable to rid herself of the red shoes. The ballet sequence in which we see Vicky encapsulate her character and venture into the nightmare world of the dance is horrific. Her own emotions have merged with the character. Her dancing has become her life force. Then there’s the conflict she has between Julian who is an aspiring musician who is working for pennies and has the freedom to create the material he wants and then Lermontov who requires strict control over the whole operation. I think it is to Powell and Pressburger’s credit that they manage to succeed in creating three entirely different yet well-rounded characters who all have their motives and flaws. It’s a film that feels progressive even now and doesn’t belong to a particular time. It’s reluctance to slot into a specific genre is also reflective of this as it is a drama, thriller, horror, dance piece all in one.

I think that Shearer’s performance is one of my favourites in any film. She shines as Vicky and really brings out the talent and the grandeur of the role. Despite her privilege (we first see her sat in a private box watching the ballet), Vicky shows her natural passion and talent which impresses Lermontov who initially dismisses her because of her background. Despite Vicky’s flair for ballet, she is still an outsider as her fellow dancers clearly do not have the luxuries that she has. No scene depicts this better than when she thinks she is going to dinner and is dressed to the nines complete with a tiara, only to find the men running the ballet planning the next production in casual attire. Vicky is by no means a perfect individual either. She throws a tantrum when she is unable to keep up with Julian’s tempo during rehearsal. Vicky and Julian’s relationship develops as they realise that they are two sides of the same coin which Lermontov despises. The complexities of Lermontov’s character makes him one of my favourite “villains” film history. His obsession dehumanises those around him, none more so than prima ballerina, Irina Boronskaya (Ludmilla Tchérina) who is abandoned by Lermontov when she announces her engagement. The people around Lermontov are dehumanised puppets where his ambitions must become their ambitions. The moment there is any hint of a life outside the ballet, they are exonerated and in Lermontov’s eyes, they never even existed. His unapologetic way of life is challenged by Vicky and the climatic scene shows a crack in the façade as he breaks down onstage and forces the production to commence without her. The vision becomes empty and the audience gazes at a moving spotlight as it flutters around the stage where Vicky should be.

irina

The music composed by Brian Easdale is nothing short of extraordinary and it effortlessly dances the line between the ballet production and the film reality until eventually both worlds merge into one. The music used in the production of The Red Shoes is spectacular with the church scene in particular remaining a highlight for me. I get chills every time I watch that segment and hear the constant bell as the lead is abandoned and left to die. Jack Cardiff’s choreography for the film is a perfect marriage for the score and the two sail on through the film and set the pace. These components are representative of Julian and Vicky’s talents and the importance of the part that they play into the film cannot be unrecognised. One of my favourite aspects of the film is Hein Heckroth‘s costumes designs. The moment when Vicky’s costume for the ballet of The Red Shoes is revealed is breathtaking and it’s one of my favourite costumes in film. Not to mention the incredible costumes that Vicky wears throughout and the clothes designed by Carven for Irina are exceptional.

My love for this film grows with every view and even thinking about it now, it’s incredible how much it has shaped my taste in film and been such a huge influence in my creativity. It’s such a beautiful film that deserves more than one watch and I think it should be on every film lover’s watch list if they haven’t already seen it. It truly deserves its masterpiece status and remains an important part of cinema history.

What do you think of The Red Shoes? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

A Nightmare on Elm Street Ranking

If you had to ask me what my favourite horror franchise is, I would say A Nightmare on Elm Street with no hesitation. Home to Wes Craven’s iconic slasher villain, Freddy Krueger, a dream-haunting nightmare with knives for fingers on one hand. He’s disgusting and terrifying and doesn’t let his victims die easily. The first film was released in 1984 and has seen multiple sequels, a reboot and even a feature mashup with another certain horror icon. They’re not to everyone’s taste due to their extreme violence and inappropriate content but as a horror fan, I find them fun to watch. Kruegar is the first truly charismatic slasher to come from this genre as Jason and Michael Myers silently stalk and kill their prey. Freddy on the other hand likes to torment his victims and is constantly making grim jokes about their pending demise. Wes Craven has always been a skilled filmmaker but he really reached his peak with this creation. It’s brilliant and crosses the line between horror and humour. This makes the films entertaining and, dare I say, enjoyable to watch.

Now I’ve already done a ranking for the Child’s Play and Final Destination films which you can read here and here, respectively, but I thought it would be fun to look at this franchise as a whole and see where the films would slot from best to worst.

Without further ado, let’s delve into the nightmare and get on with the reviews:

A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984)

The one that started the nightmare. A Nightmare on Elm Street is a pioneer in the slasher genre, coming after Halloween (1978) and Friday the 13th (1980). Spearheaded by horror legend, Wes Craven and featuring Robert Englund as the gruesome killer, Krueger, we are plunged into a world that sees the teens of Elm Street slashed to death one by one. The film is widely known for its explicit violence, paedophilic themed subtext and also marked Johnny Depp’s film debut. A group of teens start being killed off one by one, apparently by a badly burned man with knives for fingers. Led by Nancy Thompson (Heather Langenkamp), the group work together to trap and kill the monster. It’s an iconic film. Even if you haven’t heard of it, you know what Krueger looks like and the basic premise of the film. Nancy is a brilliant protagonist and just like Laurie Strode in Halloween franchise, she is fearless when needed. It’s strange to think that a genre associated with the subjectification and glorification of violence towards women (which is a completely legitimate issue) also provides such progressive roles for women as well. There’s a humour in this film that you don’t really see in other slashers that would set a trend for franchises like Child’s Play and the sequels for Friday the 13th which purposely become weirder as the films went on.

nightmare1.jpg

A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy’s Revenge (1985)

It’s no secret that I love camp horror films. I love a film that isn’t afraid to be highly satirical of itself and the genre. Despite only being released a year before, Freddy had become somewhat of a titan of horror. A sequel was rushed through with no involvement from Craven and the result is the polar opposite of its predecessor. The film follows the Walsh family who move into the Thomson family home five years after Freddy’s initial defeat. Teenage Jesse (Mark Patton) is struggling to fit in and finds himself getting into fights with his peers at school but his world is quickly flipped when the people who . The film has become a cult classic among fans and is known for its homosexual undertones with Englund himself declaring it a “bisexual film”. There is a strong argument to suggest that Jesse’s inability to fit in is due to his conflict with his own sexuality. The big issue that I have with this film is that it flips Freddy around to be the hero. When he’s bullied by a group of partying teenagers, the audience sympathises with him. This sentiment was shared by Craven himself who stated that Freddy should be “threatening and overpowering” which I think was missing. Freddy becomes a punchline in this feature rather than a genuine threat.

A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors (1987)

This sequel does not get enough love. Coming off the failure of the previous installment, Dream Warriors is a brilliant addition to the franchise. It’s known among fans of the franchise that this film is fantastic but not as well known to horror fans in general who truthfully are missing out. Following a group of young people in a psychiatric ward, we see Freddy messing with the minds of these vulnerable individuals and watch as their pleas are quashed by the doctors and other authorities figures. The film marked Patricia Arquette’s film debut as Kristen Parker, a young teen who is chased in her dreams by Freddy who then cuts her wrists which looks like a suicide attempt to her mother who swiftly commits her to Westin Hills psychiatric hospital. She teams up with a group like her who have had nightmares of the same man and soon they are killed one by one. Calling themselves “dream warriors”, they plan to use their weaknesses as strengths to quash Freddy’s murderous attempts. The film also marks the welcome return of Heather Langenkamp as Nancy who has grown to be a psychiatrist, inspired by the events of her childhood. This film features some of the best death scenes in the franchise and sees Craven taking control of his franchise once again.

A Nightmare on Elm Street 4: The Dream Master (1988)

The film follows the remaining survivors of the third film (Tuesday Knight taking over the role of Kristen Parker) after they have been released from the psychiatric unit one year later. Kristen is still haunted by what happens and Freddy returns to cause havoc on the survivors and their school friends. This is where the films start to play the same routine and becomes more repetitive but trying to make the death scenes as ridiculous as possible. There is even a death where one of the girls is turned into a cockroach and squished! It’s still a good popcorn flick but largely unoriginal. This film also features Lisa Wilcox as new protagonist, Alice Johnson, who takes the helm as scream queen for this segment after befriending Kristen. I like the aspect of bringing someone else into the dream which is continued from the third film into this one. Freddy uses Alice to lure him to her friends who he starts to pick off one by one, including a horrific death involving her asthmatic friend. This installment was the highest grossing the original franchise and kept it that way until 2003’s Freddy vs. Jason so it was a huge hit with audiences.

A Nightmare on Elm Street 5: The Dream Child (1989)

The fifth film follows Alice (Lisa Wilcox) who is still haunted by the events of the fourth film. The opening scene throws us immediately into the dream world as we see Alice as Amanda Krueger, a nun who works in a men’s psychiatric ward who is subsequently raped by masses of inmates when she is accidentally locked among them. She has a second nightmare that sees Freddy as a baby digging up his remains from the fourth film and brings him back to life. After Alice’s boyfriend, Dan (Danny Hassel), dies tragically, Alice is convinced that Freddy is back which is swiftly followed by the revelation that she is pregnant and Freddy subsequently starts to give the unborn baby powers so he can be more like him. There is a lot going on in this film and the more I think about it, the more confused I become. There’s the usual plotline of Freddy killing teenagers then the subplot of Alice’s pregnancy and then there’s the second subplot involving Freddy’s origins. It’s a lot to cram into one film and naturally the film fails because of it.

Freddy’s Dead: The Final Nightmare (1991)

This installment is by far my least favourite. If you thought the previous film was overcomplicated then you’re not prepared for this one. Freddy has killed all the kids and teenagers in a small town and seeks out the one survivor to bring more teens to kill. There are so many questions that come to mind regarding the cannon and where this sits in the universe as there is no reason for his reincarnation from the last one. The adults in the small town have gone insane and there is definitely a strange Twin Peaks tone that they are going for that fails spectacularly. This is probably the rock bottom for the original franchise and seems to just be a money grab rather than a genuine passion project. It also features a cameo from Johnny Depp and a bizarre cameo from Roseanne Barr who plays one of the deranged townspeople.

Wes Craven’s New Nightmare (1994)

This film takes place outside the universe and is a unique experience as it is very meta. Following the making of a new film, Freddy breaks out and starts killing the cast and crew. Featuring a return from Heather Langenkamp and with many of the other parts played by cast and crew. Wes Craven returned for the project and the great thing is that it seems like everyone is genuinely having fun. It’s a shame that this film had become largely forgotten as it is a great addition to the franchise. It’s to Craven’s credit that he is always trying to think of something new while still being faithful to the originals. The Freddy in this film also goes back to darker routes and becomes less comical than the last few installments.

Freddy vs. Jason (2003)

This film is one of those that is so bad it’s great and I love it. Freddy resurrects Friday the 13th villain, Jason Voorhees in a bid to scare the residents of Elm Street while they’re awake so he can kill them while they sleep. Soon enough, Jason starts going on a killing spree which angers Freddy and the two become embroiled in a feud that brings a huge body count. It’s a fun film that ventures on the wackier side and also serves up a variety of stereotypes in an ironic way such as the resident stoner and drunk partying teens. The film is the last to feature Englund as Krueger and stars Ken Kirzinger as Jason. It’s a shame they didn’t follow this up with a sequel as it would have been great to see what more they can do with this universe cursed with this villains. It’s not a great film by any means but it’s a fun popcorn flick. I think what makes this film so enjoyable to watch ishat it isn’t afraid to poke fun at itself and be completely bonkers.

A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)

This is one of those rare films where I go against the grain a little bit. This film was (rightfully) torn apart by critics like one of Freddy’s victims despite its commercial success. It is equally hated by fans and despised so much that they didn’t even bother making any sequels for this reboot. It’s a rehash of the first film with newcomer Rooney Mara filling the boots for Nancy Thompson. The reason I go against the grain is that I am one of the few people who actually enjoyed this reboot. Don’t get me wrong, it doesn’t hold a candle besides the original at all but I thought it was an interesting take in bringing up the darker themes that couldn’t be discussed in the original, mainly Freddy’s paedophilic nature. I think Jackie Earle Healey is one of the most underrated actors working today and his performance is a darker take on Englund’s Krueger. I understand why his performance wasn’t well received because the humour and charisma is what differentiates Kruegar from other slasher villains. Also, Mara is one of my favourite actresses working today and this is the film that properly introduced me to her (aside from The Social Network but that was a small support role). I thought that the darker tone was an interesting aspect to explore but I do think ultimately the film suffers because of this and becomes just another horror film.

So that’s all of the reviews done and dusted. I am not sure if they’re going to create anymore, especially since Craven has since sadly passed, but it would be intriguing to see how they would reintroduce Freddy in this new revolutionary climate.

Here is my ranking:

1) A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984)

2) A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors (1987)

3) A Nightmare on Elm Street 4: The Dream Master (1988)

4) A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy’s Revenge (1985)

5) Wes Craven’s New Nightmare (1994)

6) Freddy vs. Jason (2003)

7) A Nightmare on Elm Street 5: The Dream Child (1989)

8) A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)

9) Freddy’s Dead: the Final Nightmare (1991)

What do you think? Which one is your favourite? Let me know in the comments below!