Tag: London

Categories
Uncategorised

Last Night in Soho (2021)

Trigger warning: This review delves into various aspects of Last Night in Soho, including its depiction of sexual assault and rape.

Edgar Wright’s latest film Last Night in Soho had its premiere at this year’s Venice Film Festival and has undoubtedly been one of the most discussed films of the year so far due to its eclectic merging of genres and time periods. The film follows aspiring fashion designer, Ellie (Thomasin McKenzie) as she moves to London to study fashion design at the London College of Fashion. Not everything is so simple though as Ellie is able to see the ghost of her mother in mirrors and when she moves into a bedsit after her stay in student halls go wrong, she begins to see visions of a young woman called, Sandie (Anya Taylor-Joy) and her struggle to become a famous singer in 1960s London. What follows is a film filled with many twists and turns until Ellie begins to lose her sense of self as the past begins to catch up with her and she finds herself at the heart of a mystery that explores darker and timely subject matters such as sexual assault, loss, and treatment of women.

The film is directed by Edgar Wright who cowrote the screenplay with Krysty Wilson-Cairns. The film is filled with Wright’s signature flair and use of vibrant colors. However, where a lot of Wright’s previous films are filled to the brim with larger than life characters, there aren’t as many in Last Night in Soho. This could be because the film dives into much darker territory than others and doesn’t have the same level of humour. A lot of the controversy generated from Last Night in Soho is with regards to the writing and it’s clear that Wright and Wilson-Cairns have tried to use the paradox between periods to discuss sexual assault but it doesn’t feel as though the script delves deep enough into the trauma and psyche of the victim while explicitly showing various scenes of abuse and rape. To see such an unflinching depiction of sexual violence against a female character has caused a lot of understandable upset amongst victims and the level of upset could be because the script doesn’t do a lot to delve deeper into the mentality and characterisation of the female characters as it could have done.

Thomasin McKenzie plays the film’s lead, Ellie, and it’s great to see her star on the rise as she has provided such brilliant performances previously. McKenzie does what she can with the character but it doesn’t feel as though Ellie’s character is fleshed out enough which is unfortunate as McKenzie is a fantastic actress. On the surface, it can seem that Ellie simply has visions and then subsequently runs around screaming but there is obviously something a lot deeper going on. It could be argued that her mental health has taken a toll since the loss of her mother and it would have been so interesting to see the screenplay delve into this aspect a bit more so we could understand Ellie better. Even though she is the protagonist, Ellie is an observer and an outsider in her own world and the world of the 1960s. When she is dreaming, she is lurking on the edges of the frame as she enters Sandie’s world whereas in her own life, she is an outcast among her peers and cannot seem to fit in anywhere. It feels as though the film happens around Ellie and we don’t see her character develop as much as it should do through the film’s two hour running time.

The highlight of the film is Anya Taylor-Joy as Sandie, the woman Ellie observes in the 1960s. From the moment Sandie enters the film in a flowing pink chiffon dress with her hair in a bouffant style, the film begins to find its momentum. Taylor-Joy is absolutely electric as Sandie and is arguably the film’s heartbeat and keeps the audience gripped. Sandie is an aspiring singer who befriends manager, Jack (Matt Smith), who promises her the world so long as she stays by his side. What follows is a downwards spiral where Sandie is taken advantage of at the hands of many men thanks to Jack’s greed and lust for control. Even in the film’s darkest moments, it is Taylor-Joy’s sincere portrayal of Sandie that lets the audience into the world that the film inhabits and wanting to know how the story ends.

Another small but great performance is provided by the late, great Diana Rigg as Ellie’s landlady, Ms Collins. As mentioned, it is only a small role but she fills it with such intrigue that when she is onscreen, she grabs the attention. Her final scene in which she confides in Ellie is brilliant and highly intense, showing that you don’t need bells and whistles for great characterisation whilst also boasting the flawless subtleties when reflecting on her previous scenes.

Another highlight of the film is the original score by Steven Price which highlights the horror tones of the film. A lot of the tracks feel reminiscent of horror films from 1960s and its clear that this is what Price wanted to convey. It is the score that provides the dark undertone throughout the whole film and leaves the audience in anticipation, especially as the visions start to take place and the puzzle begins to piece itself together.

Last Night in Soho is a difficult film to discuss due to its subject matter and the way this is handled. It is clear that it has been made with good intentions but whether it is successful in what it is trying to say is another thing. There are aspects of Last Night in Soho that are great such as Anya Taylor-Joy’s performance and Steven Price’s score but the overall tone of the film feels conflicted and confused, especially as Ellie’s characterisation doesn’t feel completely realised. Last Night in Soho is a departure from Wright’s other films and although it doesn’t have the same spark as his previous outings, it will be interesting to see where his career goes next.

What did you think of Last Night in Soho? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

London Film Festival 2020: Roundup

With London Film Festival concluding today and all of my reviews done and dusted, I thought I would write this post to roundup my experience. Being my first film festival, I was so excited to be apart of something I have been a fan of for years. Looking at the lineup, it seemed that there were four major films: Steve McQueen’s Mangrove, Chloe Zhao’s Nomadland, Pete Docter’s Soul and Francis Lee’s Ammonite and I was determined to see at least two of these. Luckily I was able to see Mangrove and Ammonite on the screenings but sadly wasn’t successful in the ballot to see Nomadland and I don’t live in London to see Soul. However, I was thrilled with all the films I watched. I decided that my target was to watch 10 films and make them as varied as I could. In total, I watched 12 films and this includes documentaries, shorts, animation, drama, horror, foreign language, etc. There wasn’t one film that disappointed me and many standouts that I hope go on to receive award recognition and open new doors to create more films.

Overall, what stood out to me was the quality of the writing in the films I watched which was absolutely fantastic. The creativity and originality of the films I watched shows that the industry isn’t failing and there is room for films that push boundaries. From adaptations to original pieces, each film was so distinctive and unique that I was so pleased with how many well-rounded characters there were.

I thought it would be fun to come up with my personal winners from the Festival from the films I watched. As I previously said, there were no disappointments so this will be tricky. I have also added a special Shoutout category because the winner of this gave two brilliant performances and has clearly had a stellar year. I wanted to recognise this with their own special category.

Here are the Smaller Pictures Winners of London Film Festival:

Best Picture – Wolfwalkers

Best Director – Tomm Moore and Ross Stewart for Wolfwalkers

Best Leading Actor – Riz Ahmed for Mogul Mowgli

Best Leading Actress – Tilda Swinton for The Human Voice

Best Supporting Actor – Fazlur Rahman Babu for The Salt in Our Waters (Nonajoler Kabbo)

Best Supporting Actress – Letitia Wright for Mangrove

Best Original Screenplay – Will Collins for Wolfwalkers

Best Adapted Screenplay – Pedro Almodóvar for The Human Voice

Best Documentary Feature – One Man and His Shoes

Best Original Score – Jim Williams for Possessor

Best Song – “Running with the Wolves”, AURORA from Wolfwalkers

Best Cinematography – Stéphane Fontaine for Ammonite

Best Editing – Matthew Hannam for Possessor

Best Production Design – Tomm Moore, Ross Stewart and Maria Pareja for Wolfwalkers

Best Costume Design – Michael O’Connor for Ammonite

Best Hair and Makeup – The Human Voice

Special Shoutout Winner – Sean Bean for Wolfwalkers and Possessor

London Film Festival has given me some amazing memories and been a highlight of my year and a brilliant opportunity that I am so grateful for. I am also so excited to announce that I will be reviewing films from the upcoming Raindance Film Festival at the end of this month so my Festival journey hasn’t ended just yet!

So that’s it for my little awards section and roundup! Which film are you looking forward to seeing the most? Let me know in the comments below!

Just in case you want to read my reviews for the films, I have included them below. I really recommend watching all of them:

Ammonite

Farewell Amor

Herself

The Human Voice

Lovers Rock

Mangrove

Mogul Mowgli

One Man and His Shoes

Possessor

The Salt in Our Waters (Nonajoler Kabbo)

Siberia

Wolfwalkers

Categories
Uncategorised

London Film Festival 2020: Lovers Rock

The last film on my list brings the whole Festival to full circle as it ends with the second episode of Steve McQueen’s Small Axe series named Lovers Rock. The film spans a single evening taking place at a house party in Ladbroke Grove and, much like Mangrove, serves as a safe place for the black community to gather. Following protagonist Martha (Amarah-Jae St. Aubyn), a young woman who sneaks out of her house to attend the party. The party is fun at first as she dances with her friend Patty but soon enough the darker undercurrents start to seep through as she is harassed by men at the party as well as a group of white men outside. Her experience ties in with the darker experiences of other partygoers, mainly women. Patty leaves because she doesn’t want to be left alone with a stranger and another woman, Cynthia, is raped by a man who had harassed Martha earlier.

Despite its short 68 minute running time, McQueen makes the best of this time by creating a complex intertwining of relationships in the short duration of events. Martha’s experience is one that spreads across many emotions from elation at attending the party with her best friend, Patty to the fear of being harassed by a fellow partygoer to the horror of the violence. The script written by McQueen and Courttia Newland is compact and wastes no time in getting into the rush of party preparation while allowing some time for the characters to naturally flourish in the second act before violence kicks off. This short snippet of time exposes us to a lot of characterisation and actually gives us a good idea of who Martha is and what kind of person she is. The shift in gender dynamic is brilliantly done as the women lead the party by dancing on their own but after the incredible “Silly Games” scene which I will discuss later, the party is overrun by the men who are frantic. As night goes on, the party becomes more aggressive and violent until the walls seem like they are closing in, making for a claustrophobic experience. The safe place doesn’t feel so secure any more to Martha.

Amarah-Jae St. Aubyn is brilliant as lead character, Martha. A normal woman who is excited to party with her friend but has a strength that means she isn’t afraid to stand up for herself. What St. Aubyn does so well is bringing out Martha’s character little by little through actions and mannerisms. When Cynthia is raped, Martha is unafraid to stand up for her and stop him. Even when he squares up to her and towers over her, she stands tall. You would not think that this is St. Aunbyn’s first leading role as she is so natural in the role. It’s a great character arc as well. From a timid young woman sneaking out to party to the final shot of her sneaking back in a d clearly feeling changed from her experience. We see the changes that she has experienced on her face in those final moments.

In the supporting role we have Micheal Ward as fellow partygoer, Franklyn, who proves to be a perfect match for St. Aubyn. The interaction between the two works perfectly as they bounce off each other. Franklyn acts as a fly on the wall to the party. He doesn’t partake in the men’s dancing and is dedicated to making sure Martha is safe despite having never met her before this night. Ward isn’t in it that much but his presence and protection can be felt when Martha is wandering around the party. The final scenes in which he is in where he encounters his boss who is unhappy that he brought Martha to the shop bring the microcosm of the party to the outside world. Franklyn serves as Martha’s guide for the party and arguably to life, introducing her to a world that she hasn’t encountered before.

The highlight scene is when Samson, the DJ, cuts the music to get the attendees to sing “Silly Games” by Janet Kay accapella and it is a wonderful choice. The partygoers keep dancing and create the rhythm together in a way that highlights the tightness of the community. McQueen really is a genius when it comes to intertwining art forms in his films and this is a great way of incorporating music in a way we haven’t seen before. Because the music has been so continuous as well it helped to slow the pace down for a little bit as the shift from fun to chaos ensues.

The music choices in Lovers Rock provides the ongoing flow for the episode and adds to the frantic nature of the party. An eclectic mix of lovers rock, reggae and blues, Lovers Rock is brimming with black music and it is a brilliant soundtrack. The hectic and continuing nature of the music becomes synonymous with the action as though it is playing an active role.

Lovers Rock closes the London Film Festival on the 18th October and will show on BBC One in the United Kingdom on

Categories
Uncategorised

London Film Festival 2020: Ammonite

One of the final films for this year’s London Film Festival comes in the form of Francis Lee’s Ammonite. Written and directed by Lee, the film follows Victorian palaeontologist Mary Anning and her time spent with Charlotte Murchison who would eventually become a palaeontologist herself. Starring Oscar winner Kate Winslet and Oscar nominee Saoirse Ronan as Anning and Murchison, respectively, Ammonite is a slow burning romance filled with beautiful cinematography and boasting a host of stellar performances. It premiered at Toronto Film Festival and was one of the most talked about films coming into London Film Festival so I was excited to have a chance to watch it.

Shot on location at the Jurassic Coast at Lyme Regis, Ammonite is just as hard and cold as its surroundings with Anning’s character specifically being chipped away at like one her fossils until we see her true self revealed. Francis Lee brings in a unique perspective by adding in a lesbian storyline due to Anning’s privacy regarding her personal life and with the knowledge that she never married or had children. There is no proof to say she was a lesbian but there isn’t any proof to say otherwise and the film hasn’t been written as confirmed history. What is fact, however, is that Anning’s life was full of injustices. From the offset, Anning’s injustices are seen as the fossil she uncovered is placed in the British Museum and her name is replaced by a man’s. This happens before we even see her onscreen. Our introduction to Anning is quite literally the science community erasing women from the narrative.

As expected, Kate Winslet is perfect casting as Mary Anning. Stubborn and guarded, Anning sees through the grandeur and spectacle of the male dominated science community. Bringing her best performance in years, Winslet’s Anning longs for happiness but shuts herself away from it, deciding to focus on her work. Even when she initially meets Roderick and Charlotte Murchison, she is reluctant and unhappy to give them a private audience as she prefers her own company. However, we see her facade fade away as she nurses Charlotte back to health after she contracts a fever. Anning longs to be among the elite in society but knows that she never will. Charlotte has everything she wants and even when presented with the opportunity to join her, Anning doesn’t want to be in a submissive position. Winslet plays Anning with strength and resilience that both aids and damages the character.

Saoirse Ronan’s performance as Charlotte Murchison puts her back in the familiar period setting that she excels in. Murchison is consumed by mental illness following the loss of her baby and is sent to shadow Anning at the insistence of her husband who goes travelling for five months. She is timid and quiet and quickly clashes with Anning’s brash character. After falling ill, Charlotte has a new outlook on life and grows attached Mary which slowly blossoms into a romance between them. As the film’s focus is mainly on Anning, I would say Ronan doesn’t shine as much as Winslet because we don’t get to know Charlotte to the same extent. I would have loved to have seen a more developed character arc for her or perhaps a note at the end of the film to confirm her own successful career as a palaeontologist. Ronan does the best with the material she has, however, and is a great onscreen match with Winslet. It’s hard to believe that it has taken so long to have these two powerhouses acting alongside each other.

The costume design by Michael O’Connor is a highlight in the film, particularly the handmade knit pieces the two leads wear. Anning’s weave and rib knit jumper is a beautiful and practical piece that has the robustness to reflect her profession and personality. On the other hand, Murchison’s delicate white knitted shawl is so fragile it could be lace. It is so fresh and clean which contrasts with the mud laden beach. Anning’s clothes are predominantly dark greys and blues and reflect the bleak coastal scenery with Murchison’s more bright and lavish outfits commanding the centre of attention in all of her scenes.

Overall, Ammonite shows Francis Lee’s skill with colour and vision, giving a voice to an overlooked woman in science. His boldness and imagination to suggest a different narrative doesn’t take away from Anning’s confirmed achievements. Lee has cemented himself as a director to watch with this strong follow-up to his 2017 debut, God’s Own Country.

Ammonite is screening at the London Film Festival on the 17th October and will be released in the United Kingdom in 2021.

Categories
Uncategorised

London Film Festival 2020: Possessor

Film number 10 on my Festival watch list is one of the horrors I have been eagerly awaiting this year since its premiere at Sundance. Possessor is the latest ultraviolent offering written and directed by Brandon Cronenberg. Following Tasya Vos, an assassin who works by controlling the bodies of a pawn so her real identity is kept secret. From the opening, we see her grasp of control slip and this proves true in her new assignment when the man she takes over begins to fight back. As son of esteemed director David Cronenberg, it’s clear that there is a familial trait for creating films filled with explicit gore and pushing the envelope as to how far the human psyche can go. However, to dismiss Brandon Cronenberg as a copy of his father would be a huge mistake. There is an emphasis on the human condition that is done in such an interesting way that I haven’t seen before. There are so many layers to uncover in this film and so much going on that it can be overwhelming but in the best way possible. It’s done intentionally to reflect Tasya’s overbearing mind.

Cronenberg’s writing perfectly encapsulates Tasya’s experience and puts that into his script. The film’s pacing is so fast and sharp that you don’t even realise that it is a 100 minute film. It is absolutely non-stop, taking no time for a breather and Tasya doesn’t have time to rest during her assignment. The opening scene in which Tasya has taken control over a young woman called Holly and completes a mission is gripping and jaw-dropping. From the offset, it is clear that Cronenberg isn’t afraid of bringing an abundance of violence and gore but in a way that cleverly sets up the story and makes the audience ask questions, wanting to know more.

Andrea Riseborough has been delivering astonishing performances for years and her turn in the 2018 film Mandy was a standout in horror that year. It was only natural that she is finally given a leading role. Her performance as Tasya Vos is deeply complex. Tasya continues to work as an assassin despite her clear mental fragility and her slip on control and reality. It’s as though she thinks working will eventually rid her of the pain but her latest assignment proves more than difficult. It’s exciting to see Riseborough in a film like this that is so daring and exciting. Even though it is Christopher Abbott acting as Colin, Riseborough’s performance is so emotive and effective that we feel her presence through the film. This of course is also due to Abbott’s stellar performance as Colin, the man Tasya has been tasked with possessing. Abbott’s performance is vulnerable as he has to play Colin as Tasya inside of Colin’s head and then act out the conflict the two of them have. This is by no means an easy feat and he performs the hell of this role. As Vasya’s grasp on control loosens and turns to Colin’s favour, he becomes more violent and unpredictable to the point where he doesn’t know what he is doing anymore.

There are brilliant support turns particularly from Jennifer Jason Leigh and Sean Bean as Tasya’s boss, Girder and assassin target, John Parse, respectively. Leigh’s performance is subtly fantastic as her concern for Tasya slowly comes to light. She clearly feels a lot for Tasya but is so determined for her to complete the job. Always veering Tasya on the path on control, Girder refuses to lose faith in her employee and Leigh portrays this conflict she has with Tasya’s mind brilliantly. On the other hand, Bean is great as a semi-villainous businessman. Void of dignity and full of fake sentiment, John Parse is a man who is all about appearances. This is something Sean Bean doesn’t play often as he tends to veer towards likeable characters and he pulls this off with a really strong performance. He isn’t in the film for a long time but when he is he immediately draws the audience in with his unpredictability.

The music in Possessor is fantastic bringing aspects of techno sounds to elevate the sci-fi qualities of the film. Composed by Jim Williams, who has done a fair share of horror films, it appears to be a perfect match with Cronenberg and hits the tone of the film perfectly. The way the music is edited to reflect Tasya’s conflict as it overlaps and particularly the piece when she possesses Colin’s body is among the best score tracks I have heard this year. A brilliant and innovative soundtrack that is just as unpredictable and exciting as the film.

Brandon Cronenberg has proven himself to be a stellar writer and director with this film. Providing a brilliant mix of sci-fi and horror, Possessor keeps you on your toes with its many twists and turns as it brims with thrills throughout. It’s a visceral experience that will linger with you long after watching it. A brilliant addition to the best horrors of the 21st century so far. It’s very exciting to see what Cronenberg has up his sleeve next.

Possessor is showing at the BFI London Film Festival on the 16th October and is out in the United Kingdom on the 27th November 2020.

Categories
Uncategorised

London Film Festival 2020: The Human Voice

One of the projects I was really excited to watch was this half an hour short film written and directed by Pedro Almodóvar based on a play of the same name by Jean Cocteau. Premiering at this year’s Venice Film Festival, I was so excited to see that it was included in the London Film Festival line-up and knew I had to watch it. Starring the incredible Tilda Swinton as a nameless Woman whose mental health diminishes as her partner goes missing for three days. With the exception of a scene near the beginning in which Swinton’s character buys an axe from a hardware store, she is the only character onscreen. Primarily set in her luxurious apartment filled with glamorous clothes and modern art placed everywhere, it would seem that the character has a life worth dreaming but we soon learn that this is a mask for something much darker.

In true Almodóvar style, there is a heavy focus on the setting and a strong visual aesthetic that usually is more telling than the dialogue. The attic apartment the woman lives in is clearly a set within a warehouse. This highlights that like all the luxurious goods she owns that the materials are all fake. What Almodóvar does brilliantly is an analytical breakdown of a character that is shown little by little like a puzzle piece. Even when presenting a short film, it is filled with so much story and character analysis that a lot of features miss out. The script is action based in the first act before becoming dominated by what could be described as a monologue as the Woman talks to her estranged partner but we only hear her side. The way the camera follows the Woman from above and completely exposes the set is a fantastic artistic choice as well. It really plays into that feeling of the Woman being trapped inside a doll’s house and being stuck in her own little world.

Tilde Swinton is always a tour de force in whatever she does and this film is definitely a collaboration between her and Almodóvar. It makes perfect sense that they would work together. Her performance is, as expected, executed to perfection. Her magnetism draws you and you want to understand the character and get to know her. When she receives a call from her estranged partner, she plugs in her wireless earphones to talk to him. We don’t hear anything he says only her response. It is during this increasingly intense conversation that the mask begins to slip and cracks start to show. We understand her actions and why she has bought the axe and attacked the bed with it. The apartment clearly acts like a bird cage that the Woman cannot seem to escape from even though she knows that her relationship has come to an end. As she progresses in her conversation, she finds herself unwilling to dominate control over her partner and finds herself constantly apologising and submitting to his every whim. It is when he appears to hang up at a tender moment that breaks her and she is able to break away from his and regain her control. Although it may seem simple to be in a film by yourself, it is actually the opposite and Swinton knocks out a performance that I would argue is among her best.

The music composed by Alberto Iglesias is breathtaking and elevates the film to that dramatic and cinematic level. As the Woman lingers around the house and ventures to the hardware store, the score is what provides that ambience. The music allows the unspoken words to come through and is ever increasing in tension as the build up to the phone conversation takes place. It really assisted in heightening the drama and expressing the loneliness and mental fragility that the Woman feels.

Despite only being thirty minutes, this has proven to be one of the highlights of the festival for me. Almodóvar can always be relied on to deliver a project that is captivating and thrilling with a hint of horror without actually showing gore. His control as a filmmaker is superb and not everyone could pull off such a complex project in a way that feels so cinematic and artistic. The Human Voice is a reflection not only of what one can do with limited resources but that great cinema can be created with the pandemic restrictions.

The Human Voice is showing at BFI London Film Festival on the 17th October and will be released in the United Kingdom on the 6th November.

Categories
Uncategorised

London Film Festival 2020: One Man and His Shoes

The only documentary I have seen in the festival thus far, One Man and His Shoes is the debut feature documentary from Yemi Bamiro. The film follows the rise of Michael Jordan’a relationship with Nike and the creation of the Air Jordans in the 1980s and how they have created a trend for extremely expensive and exclusive trainers that exists today. Without any input from a Nike representative or Jordan himself, Bamiro creates a well-rounded view of the Air Jordan history by interviewing people who worked at Nike, experts in sport marketing as well as people who have large Air Jordan collections. This gives the view from the starting point those who helped conceptualise the brand all the way down to the release of the shows the customers who purchase the product.

The documentary provides an outlook on society as a whole in regards to the American political state in the 1980s which was deeply conservative and ran by President Ronald Reagan. There was much disturbance and discourse to those who were working class and people of colour because the discrimination against them was growing and so vast that they began to rebel in their own way. When the Air Jordans were banned from the NBA, they became a hugely desired item in the streets because they were a form of protest. As Jordan’s success grew as a basketballer, his marketing with Nike also grew more aggressive. The drive to promote the Air Jordans plus the ban the NBA imposed resulted in a huge public spectacle on its release. People lining the streets and waiting for hours just so they could get a pair. Nothing like this had happened before with shoes and it shows the power of a successful marketing campaign. The significance of Jordan also being a black man with such a huge fan base cannot be ignored. Coming from humble beginnings, he is a figure that a lot of people can look up to and having a pair of the Air Jordans could make them feel like they have a slice of the American Dream.

The second act of the documentary then goes into how Jordan and Nike’s relationship originated and the huge success into how the shoes were marketed. Jordan was everywhere in the 80s as he had a lot of collaborations with various companies but his work with Nike was by far the most popular and resonated most with the customer. One of the most successful marketing campaign was Spike Lee’s adverts for the Air Jordans. Starring Lee as his character Mars Blackmon from She’s Gotta Have It and Jordan in a bid to make the product more relatable to the consumer. Lee’s filmography had begun to build traction and Jordan was a rising star in his sport so it made perfect sense. Also, the genius of unsporting humour into the adverts makes Jordan appear to have that All-American appeal. The adverts in themselves became an event with audiences excited to see what the new one would bring.

The final act of the film discusses the loss that has occurred since the release of the Air Jordans. The build up from the first hour of the documentary makes it seem as though the Air Jordans are a final product of the American Dream with the idea that Jordan’s basketball playing was enhanced by the shoes. However, it turns out that there is a dark side to the exclusive nature of the Air Jordans. Looking into the case of a young man who was fatally shot because of the new Air Jordans, his mother and sister recount the tragic event and it is during this segment where the disconnect between business and consumer becomes clear. Jordan sent the family some new shoes after the murder but they feared wearing them in case they too were killed for them. It seems extreme that people would go this far for something as materialistic as shoes but the documentary suggests that this is in part due to the aggressive marketing by Nike that is both promising but also exclusive. By stocking limited quantities in shops, it drives the desirability right up and contributes to the collectible aspect.

What One Man and His Shoes does so well is show how clothing and accessories can actually be used as a form of protest as well as expression. The Air Jordans initial ban in the NBA is what made them desirable to those who are anti-establishment. It also shows the disconnect between the corporation and the damage that can be caused because of the exclusivity that Nike markets the Air Jordans as. Their silence over the unfortunate incidents shows that despite encouraging people to use their voice and unite in their adverts, they don’t want to be linked to the murders and injuries occurred in acquiring the shoes. What Bamiro does so well is present that balance between a huge achievement in marketing and inspiration and the costs that that brings. It’s a documentary that will resonate with a lot of people for its look into fashion, sports and history with the societal backdrop. Bamiro uses every second of the film’s 83 minute running time with effect.

One Man and His Shoes is showing at the BFI London Film Festival on 13th October and is available until 16th October.

Categories
Uncategorised

London Film Festival 2020: The Salt in Our Waters (Nonajoler Kabbo)

Continuing with my London Film Festival adventure with this Bangladeshi debut feature directed and written by Rezwan Shahriar Sumit. Assisted with the Spike Lee Fellowship Award, Sumit was able to make The Salt in Our Waters (its original title is Nonajoler Kabbo), an intricate look into how climate change affects small communities and the lives these communities live. The film follows Rudro (Titas Zia), a sculptor who returns to his father’s fishing village to complete his artwork. Whilst there, he is met with hostility from the townspeople who believe his work depicts idols which is a sin. The village is led by the Chairman (Fazlur Rahman Babu) has the majority of people in his debt and dictates their everyday lives. As a city dweller, Rudro is more relaxed in his religion and more liberal in his lifestyle which creates immediate friction. His willingness to speak out against the Chairman creates a shock in the community.

The film provides topical discussions on various issues such as man vs nature and industry vs art all within the context of an environmental crisis with climate change having a direct negative effect on the village while the city promises more success. While the issues in the film delve deep, Sumit’s approach is minimalist and organic, relying on the beauty of the natural landscape. Primarily shot in the village location, we become familiar with the surroundings meaning that any changes become obvious. The fishing village is based on the shores of the ocean so they are faced with all sorts of weathers. They have to rely on their limited resources to survive but they get by. Rudro’s visit is seen as a deep disturbance to the villagers. The village seems trapped within itself, unreachable by outside society and Rudro coming via the sea is symbolic of the freedom the ocean brings. Not to mention the unfortunate suicide of one of the children who cannot bear the constraints of the community anymore.

Titas Zia gives a wonderful performance as Rudro. His character is onscreen for the majority of the film and a lot of the weight falls on his shoulders. Zia is able to capture Rudro’s desire to try and fit in or at least explain his art. His deep interest in his host family and the children of the household daughter, Tuni and her younger brother, Taher is particularly touching. His creativity inspires the children of the village which angers the men. He tackles the gender stereotyping within the village as Tuni expressing her wish to go fishing but she is not allowed to because of her gender. Rudro expresses this in his new sculpture which causes an outrage as the idea of Tuni posing for an artist equates to sex in the villagers’ eyes. His quest to save her from the restraints evidently makes it worse before a huge storm comes when the two take solace in shelter.

In support there is a wonderful performance by Fazlur Rahman Babu as the Chairman. Controlling the town by having everyone in his debt, the Chairman is the sole decision maker for anything that goes on in the town. His insistence on religion over science contributes to a devastating event in the film’s final act which proves to result in a fight of words between the Chairman and Rudro. At the beginning of the film, Rudro attempts to tip the men who help unload the cargo but is rejected by him and eventually the Chairman, who says no such action is necessary. This could be interpreted as the Chairman wanting to keep the financial control over the men. If Rudro gave them enough money to pay the Chairman’s debt then the latter would cease to have control and the foundation of his power would crumble. He takes it upon himself to educate the children rather than having a teacher in the village. This ensures that they follow his values and under his command. The script allows this corruption to seep through bit by bit. It’s never fully confirmed whether he is actively aware of his actions, but when Rudro confronts him, he does not listen to his reasonings. Babu’s performance is so effective that even when not onscreen, it still feels as though he is watching.

The Salt in Our Waters is a film that explores a variety of important issues by using the fishing village as a microcosm of the world as a whole. Sumit’s method of using Rudro’s outside perspective as the audience’s way into the film was a smart decision because it is so complex. Rudro’s differences are only highlighted when under the pressures of the village’s constricted traditions. Much like the artwork Rudro creates, the film is very raw and authentic in its approach and execution. It’s a film of heart and identity as Rudro tries to make sense of his art and his place in the world, finding somewhere to fit in.

The Salt in Our Waters is showing at the BFI London Film Festival on 13th October.

Categories
Uncategorised

London Film Festival 2020: Mangrove

The big opener for this year’s London Film Festival comes in the form of Mangrove, directed and co-written by the incredible Steve McQueen. Mangrove is the first episode of McQueen’s Small Axe miniseries due to premiere on BBC next month. The series explores racism in Britain throughout the years with all episodes based on true stories. McQueen is one of my favourite directors so Mangrove was one of my must-sees of this year’s festival. I have previously written about McQueen’s filmography which you can read here. Mangrove tells the story of the titular restaurant, a black owned business that is constantly harassed and raided by the police from the moment it opens. The Mangrove becomes a safe haven for people of colour to be and this creates concern within the corrupt police system, particularly at the hands of PC Frank Pulley, who seems determined beyond reason to bring the Mangrove to the ground.

Shaun Parkes’ leading performance of Frank Crichlow is captivating and powerful in his aim to bring forth the struggle. All Frank wants to do is run a business but the police are unwilling to allow this to happen and will do anything to shut the Mangrove down. Initially Frank is reluctant to use the Black Panthers’ assistance as he would prefer to avoid politics but he begins to understand that the Mangrove itself is political and he can’t avoid it no matter how hard he tries. What transpires is the coming together of the black community in an effort to exploit the brutality of the police by organising a protest that begins at the Mangrove establishment. Parkes’ portrayal of Frank is moving and poignant in these uncertain times. As minorities are persecuted and stopped in the street for no reason or than the colour of their skin, Frank’s story is just as important now as it was then. McQueen’s parallels with the 1970s is clear and makes Mangrove a protest piece in itself.

Letitia Wright is stunning as Altheia Jones-LaCointe, a prominent figure in the British Black Panthers movement. As expected, she is a strong woman who seeks equality for minorities. We first see her persuading factory workers to join a union so their voices can be heard. Wright provides a powerhouse performance and this is perfectly shown in the scene when she gives her speech at the Mangrove protest. She is riveting and makes her presence known, a real force to be reckoned with. Wright’s career has gone from strength to strength in recent years and it’s brilliant to see her collaborate with Steve McQueen. She is perfectly cast as Altheia and brings that passion and fire required for the role.

The supporting cast also do a phenomenal job led by Malachi Kirby who plays activist, Darcus Howe and Sam Spruell who plays Constable Frank Pulley, an instigator of the racism towards the black community. Alex Jennings also does a great job as the upper class and uptight Judge Edward Clarke, whose bias towards the police is soon shattered as the corruption begins to seep through during the trial. The details put into everyone’s character becomes distinct and identifiable as the Mangrove Nine go to trial.

McQueen’s handling of the protest scene is done perfectly. To reflect its chaotic nature, McQueen makes use of multiple observational shots from all kinds of angles, including the observation slot in the police car. When Altheia is delivering her speech, a part of the shot centres on her shadow on a nearby car in the rain. It’s the kind of shot you would see in a cinematic feature but it works extremely well here. The power of the protesters against the police is built up and soon enough the latter begins to fight back and take away placards and signs. The brutally of the police here is delivered in a fully real way in true McQueen fashion, unflinching and unapologetic.

Despite being made for TV, McQueen does a fantastic job of making Mangrove feel like a cinematic experience. As I have previously said, he has never put a foot wrong and the passion he has for this project is evident. The detail in character development to song choices and the perfectly balanced script allows Mangrove to show the people behind the trial and the importance of their fight against the police.

Mangrove will air in the United Kingdom on BBC One on the 15th November.

Categories
Uncategorised

London Film Festival 2020: Farewell Amor

Ntare Guma Mbaho Mwine, Zainab Jah, and Jayme Lawson appear in Farewell Amor by Ekwa Msangi, an official selection of the U.S. Dramatic Competition program at the 2020 Sundance Film Festival. Courtesy of Sundance Institute | photo by Bruce Francis Cole. All photos are copyrighted and may be used by press only for the purpose of news or editorial coverage of Sundance Institute programs. Photos must be accompanied by a credit to the photographer and/or 'Courtesy of Sundance Institute.' Unauthorized use, alteration, reproduction or sale of logos and/or photos is strictly prohibited.

The next film that I viewed was Ekwa Msangi’s Farewell Amor. Written and directed by Msangi, Farewell Amor is a 101 minute drama following an Angolan family who are reunited in New York City after seventeen years apart. Walter (Ntare Guma Mbaho Mwine) has been working as a taxi driver in New York and living in a one bedroom flat in Brooklyn. The opening of the film sees his reunion with wife, Esther (Zainab Jah) and daughter, Sylvia (Jayme Lawson) before the film splits each act to follow each character. As suspected, the relationship between husband and wife and father and daughter is strained and in the case of the latter, Walter and Sylvia seem to be complete strangers.

Msangi’s script acts as an outline to showing the immigrant experience in America and the richness of African and African-American culture within New York. With each segment, Msangi paints the picture of these three characters and how dance brings them together. The Angolan culture is transferred over and felt despite the film solely taking place in New York. There is also an undercurrent of religious conflict as Walter’s religious distance is clear as he is uncomfortable at Esther’s insistence of worship. This starts with a simple prayer at meal time but becomes clear at Walter’s dislike of the religious ornaments and going to Church. The distance between Walter and Esther is clear as the former has clearly changed since living in America.

Mwine’s lead performance as Walter is filled with conflict as he faces his new life with Esther and Sylvia while mourning the loss of his relationship with nurse Linda. Walter’s mistakes and unfaithfulness bubble to the surface and provide the tension throughout the film but he isn’t necessarily a villain. Even when drawn to Linda at a club, he thanks her for rejecting him because he knows it’s the wrong thing. Whereas his wife was completely faithful to him all these years, Walter’s unfaithfulness sprouts from the uncertainty that he would see his family again. His relationship with Esther only spanned a short while and took place during the Angolan Civil War in which Esther fell pregnant with Sylvia. Msangi doesn’t want the audience to view Walter as a completely terrible character but one who has faced peculiar circumstance and he eventually learns through the film that he needs to get to know his family all over again.

The second segment follows Sylvia. Jayme Lawson’s performance as the quiet teen is filled with ambition as she strives to use the opportunity she has in America to dance. Discouraged by her mother and encouraged by her father, Sylvia longs to break free of her mother’s strict lifestyle. The first act sees Sylvia giving one word responses but as she practices her dancing, she grows more vocal and confident in herself. Dance is used as the common denominator between her and her father. As her relationship with him seems to grow, Esther becomes more ostracised and cannot handle the American lifestyle. Sylvia doesn’t like her new home initially but grows to it with the help of DJ, a boy from her school who encourages her to join a dance group for a competition. From there she begins to find herself and adjusts to her new life.

The last segment looks at Esther’s experience. Zainab Jah does a fantastic job of balancing the strictly religious Esther and her fear of being in a new country. Up until this segment, her insecurities have been brewing and we see it reach the boiling point as Walter’s affair comes to light. What Jah does so brilliantly in her performance is show us the slow deterioration of Esther’s strength and confidence. Living with Walter was all Esther wanted but the American Dream wasn’t all it lived up to be. They live in a tiny apartment and barely scrape by with Walter working long hours. These little details build up inside Esther until she can’t handle it anymore.

The result of Farewell Amor is an amazingly structured film that shows the contrast between cultures and how the two can be merged together. The family unit is fragmented but by embracing the American culture, they are able to come together to show their love for Angola. It’s a beautiful and subtle film highlighting the power of the arts and expression and one that I think will resonate with a lot of viewers.

Farewell Amor is showing at London Film Festival on 9th October. You can purchase tickets on the BFI website.