Paul Thomas Anderson turns his attention to a period drama involving high fashion in 1950’s London. The hype for this film was electric with much of the buzz revolving around Phantom Thread being the swansong for method acting master, Daniel Day-Lewis. Anderson’s previous efforts centre on dreamy Californian landscapes, but here he swaps the American Dream for a film that captures the essence of the time, indulging in the opulence that the characters live with.
Day-Lewis shines as Reynolds Woodcock, a renowned classically trained fashion designer who finds himself lost for inspiration. He soon finds it in his muse, Alma (Vicky Krieps) who almost becomes a lifeforce for Woodcock as his creativity is sparked.
On the surface, the film explores the flight and fancy of high society in 1950’s London but beneath lies a darker world of manipulation, the unwavering quest for perfection and the consequences this has. The film is a love story but underneath the romance lies something much darker.
Reynolds is controlled by his watchful sister, Mabel (Lesley Manville) who openly dislikes Alma who controls Reynolds by poisoning his tea with wild mushrooms. It’s an endless cycle of creativity and struggle to maintain that inspiration. He survives and thrives on that perfect idea but when it fails or runs out, it physically and mentally takes its toll.
Alma is an interesting character because the world she comes from clashes drastically with Reynolds. Having worked as a waitress previously, she is thrust into the spotlight and into the eye of high society. She fits the role physically with ease but the emotional impact the societal expectations and, more important, Reynolds expectations have on her makes for some intense encounters. Manville also lights up the screen as Mabel and her character is blunt and brash but her job is to keep the standards high. She is the constant as Reynolds wavers from high to low and high again.
Mabel’s presence is not only exciting but necessary to the friction between the characters as her treatment is consistent and her unapologetic way in demanding respect from Reynolds in particular is exciting as we rarely see a woman so equally challenging and empowering.
Phantom Thread has a moodiness that is exacerbated by a luscious colour palette. Some scenes are reminiscent of the longing and melancholy of Edward Hopper’s painting with its character-driven focus. It is a film that thrives on the reaction rather than the actions that happen.
If ever there was a director bold enough to take on an adaptation of postmodern behemoth Thomas Pynchon, it’s Paul Thomas Anderson. Inherent Vice is based on the 2009 novel of the same name set in 1970s California. Anderson sets himself a difficult challenge as the first (and still only!) person to adapt Pynchon for the screen. Remarkably enough, he even received Pynchon’s support which is incredible considering how much of a recluse the author is.
Inherent Vice is the most straightforward text as far as plot and setting goes as the focus on a singular character, Doc Sportello (Joaquin Phoenix) makes the film more accessible than say Gravity’s Rainbow which has hundreds of named characters. Phoenix delivers another knockout performance as the aloof Sportello, a drugged out cop trying to find his missing ex-girlfriend, Shasta (Katherine Waterston).
Waterston is the “find” of the film, gaining her mainstream breakthrough with her portrayal of Shasta Fay Hepworth. While other characters including Doc and Lieutenant Christian F. “Bigfoot” Bjornsen (Josh Brolin) are larger than life caricatures, Shasta is the heart of the film and acts as its emotional anchor. Not only does Waterston hold her own against Phoenix’s transformative performance, but her presence is felt throughout the film, despite only being onscreen for around 15 minutes of the film’s 148-minute runtime.
The score is provided by longtime collaborator, Jonny Greenwood who taps into the mystery elements of the plot. While the songs on the soundtrack emphasise the uplifting hazy dreamland of hippie California, Greenwood’s score brings a darker edge with lovely motifs that linger and repeat throughout the film. The “Shasta” tracks are wonderful, getting longer and more complicated as the film goes on.
As a fan of Pynchon and the novel in particular, I understand why this one was picked to adapt out of all of them as he’s not a writer for the light-hearted. Even after the unique use of syntax and whirlpool of characters, he introduces drug-fuelled ideas that only make relative sense once you allow yourself to be fully immersed in the text.
The unfamiliarity of the source material can be off-putting for some, but it’s a great film with a brilliant script. A highly underrated film, it’s not one to underestimate.
The Big Kahuna. The game changer. The film that made Anderson a solidified mainstream beast of cinema. There Will Be Blood takes its inspiration from the novel Oil! by Upton Sinclair and follows Daniel Plainview (played magnificently by Daniel Day-Lewis) and his climb to the top during the Southern California Oil Boom.
The film is set in the late 19th century and is a seemingly traditional retelling of the American Dream but as with any PTA, not all is as it seems.
Quickly Plainview’s ambition is replaced with cruelty, deception and manipulation particularly in the relationship deterioration with his son, H. W. Plainview (played by Dillon Freasier and Russell Harvard as child and adult H. W., respectively) and the mistreatment of local preacher/proclaimed prophet, Eli Sunday (Paul Dano who also plays Eli’s twin brother, Paul Sunday).
Winning Day-Lewis a second Best Actor Oscar (my favourite Day-Lewis performance) and featuring a career smash for Dano, Anderson shows his control and maturity as a filmmaker with this one. Masterpiece is a term often thrown around meaninglessly but it is more than justified here.
It’s a shame that it was up against the Coen Brothers’ offering, No Country for Old Men, as it lost out on several deserved Oscars. Not to say No Country for Old Men shouldn’t have won but I personally prefer There Will Be Blood due to how well-realised Plainview’s character is while the direction is as slick as the oil they drill.
Punch-Drunk Love is Paul Thomas Anderson’s take on a romantic comedy, but still maintains his signature absurdity and intricacy. Following a more streamlined narrative and a smaller cast of characters, Punch-Drunk Love is a 90 minute whirlwind.
Whoever says that Adam Sandler has never turned in a great performance has never seen this gem of a film. Sandler plays Barry Egan, a depressed businessman who owns a company selling novelty items such as toilet plungers. He has seven sisters who constantly ridicule and abuse him, making fun of his shortcomings and inability to find a fulfilling relationship. He meets the elusive Lena Leonard (Emily Watson), who works with one of sisters and the two get on well with relationship between them soon blossoming.
Soon enough, Barry finds himself engaged in a slew of unfortunate events when a sex-line operator extorts him and demands the collection of a large sum. He tracks down the manager of the sex-line and finds mattress store owner, Dean Trumbell (Philip Seymour Hoffman). His interaction with Dean is interesting because it is Barry’s vulnerability and sensitivity (which are often perceived as “feminine” traits) that actually intimidate Dean.
What Anderson presents us with is a complex insight into masculinity and femininity and the societal expectations that are held for both. Barry and Lena are ostracised because they openly hold traits in both and reject the norm. Lena is a successful travelling businesswoman.
The final act of the film sees Barry agree to openly support her, subverting the stereotypical gender norms. However, it isn’t done to show a sign of weakness in the relationship but rather Anderson concluding that their relationship is stronger because of their differences and unwillingness to fit in.
Commonly remembered as Paul Thomas Anderson’s epic, Magnolia is 3 hour saga follows the seemingly isolated lives of various characters and their eventual biblical crossover. Building on the legacy of Boogie Nights by incorporating more stars and more stories than its predecessor.
Set in LA, we follow the day of a policeman who finds a body in a closet, a terminally ill gameshow producer and a child progeny who is set to compete on the gameshow while suffering from abusive parents behind the scenes.
The cast features Anderson regulars such as Philip Seymour Hoffman, Julianne Moore and John C. Reily but also brings a wider cast led by Tom Cruise who brings an energetic and charismatic performance as motivational speaker, Frank T.J Mackey and Jason Robards as the ailing gameshow producer, Earl Partridge.
Magnolia tends to split critics and the audience due to its melodramatic feel and long running time but these aspects are justified and adds to its uniqueness. It’s seemingly ingrained in its own reality but this is turned on its head with the iconic scene in which frogs suddenly fall from the sky.
The film takes its audience through the full spectrum of emotions. Anderson wants us to feel uncomfortable and confused at times. It is centred around human nature and the emotions within that.
Boogie Nights marked Paul Thomas Anderson’s cinematic breakthrough with his pitch perfect observation on the porn industry in 1970s Los Angeles. We follow Eddie Adams (Mark Wahlberg), a high-school dropout who has a chance encounter with porn producer, Jack Horner (Burt Reynolds) who propels him into the spotlight of adult film under the moniker, Dirk Diggler.
The film brings drama, light comedy, acting legends, newcomers, movie magic and gritty realism which is interweaved into a large spiderweb that is just as complex as the mind. It is a colourful insight into the human condition and the lengths that a person will go in order to retain their legacy.
The cast is as starry as the Hollywood lights with Reynolds, Julianne Moore, Don Cheadle and Philip Seymour Hoffman being the standouts for me (the number of standouts shows just how star-studded this film is!). Boogie Nights brought two of its cast, Reynolds and Moore Academy Award nominations and gave Anderson his first Best Original Screenplay nomination.
It would be easy for a film about the porn industry to turn into a gratuitous portrayal from a male gaze but Anderson is mindful not to fall into this trap.
The film is not made to be aspirational or shaming and provides a more factually based and neutral perspective. The wonderful thing about Anderson is that he doesn’t patronise his audience and encourages the audience to draw their own interpretations from the film.
Indeed, by viewing Boogie Nights a simple flick on the porn industry would be to miss the underlayer that explores tragic themes such as the American Dream as a lie, female oppression, misogyny and racism.
Hard Eight marked Paul Thomas Anderson’s feature debut, providing a strong start to a lengthy career that has seen masterpiece after masterpiece over the last three decades. Despite being made on a small budget, Hard Eight boasts an incredible cast including John C. Reilly, Gwyneth Paltrow and Samuel L. Jackson.
The film follows Philip Baker Hall as gambling addict, Sydney Brown who comes across a younger man, John Finnegan (Reilly) who has lost all his money gambling. Sydney is sympathetic and take John under his wing and the two begin a successful gambling duo.
Philip Seymour Hoffman also stars in a small role as a craps player which is always welcome, particularly in an Anderson film, and proved to be the start of a great collaborative process for the two in future projects.
Compared to what would follow, the plot is simple with the focus being kept on a small number of characters that follow limited plotlines. It isn’t a film that is challenging if compared to Anderson’s other offerings in the future but it is still a profound film that explores themes such as vulnerability in masculinity, brotherhood and greed in capitalist America.
Hard Eight is a great film that shows off Anderson’s skill as a writer with a distinctive vision and the fact that his filmography only improves after this is a credit to that talent.
Die My Love is the latest offering from the incredible Lynne Ramsay. Coming almost a decade after her previous film, You Were Never Really Here, Die My Love follows doomed lovers, Grace (Jennifer Lawrence) and Jackson (Robert Pattinson) as they navigate parenthood in their new home. The film blurs the line between reality and the darkness that Grace begins to experience as she struggles with the pressures of being a new mother.
What makes Lynne Ramsay an excellent director is the fearlessness in her approach. Her films utilise morally ambiguous protagonists in a bid to discuss a larger and more universal topic which in Die My Love is postnatal depression and the pressures placed on mothers. As ever, the direction is striking as Ramsay uses the house as a metaphor for Grace’s state of mind. The opening scenes show the house empty but filled with potential and excitement as Grace and Jackson dance and goof around. Soon enough following the birth of their baby, the house becomes cluttered and dark to the point where it is completely unrecognisable. We see her try to keep herself under control while using the neighbouring woods as an outlet for her animalistic movements. However, the scene where Grace loses control and suffers a breakdown in the bathroom is extremely harrowing as she does significant damage to herself and the home in such a tiny enclosed space.
Jennifer Lawrence is electric in her turn as Grace, giving a phenomenal performance that is reminiscent of mother! in its darkness and grit. Lawrence is in a new phase of her career with complete control over her roles while also adding producer to her resume. If mother! showed a woman struggling to maintain order in a world that actively works against her then Die My Love is the result of that woman endlessly fighting against the judgement of those around her. This performance feels personal and has a rawness that only works thanks to Lawrence throwing herself into the role with everything she’s got. Grace is a character that pushes Lawrence beyond any other performance she has done and while there are some great physical moments that showcase Lawrence’s range, the scenes where she is able to convey her struggles subtly are the most heartbreaking. The scene where Grace and Jackson go to a friend’s house and Grace feels judged by the other mums. There is a fire and sorrow in her eyes that is so poignant that you feel her mind spiraling as she is triggered.
Robert Pattinson has such an eccentric filmography and that shows no sign of stopping any time soon. While the film is undeniably Lawrence’s, he still holds his own as Jackson. Grace’s struggles are front and centre to the film, but in the background we have Jackson who is grieving the recent loss of his father while also adjusting to his new role as father to his son and the pressures of being the sole moneymaker in the household. His attempts to make life better and more “normal” such as buying a dog may seem well-intended but in not warning Grace and refusing to help with the dog’s training, the sentiment doesn’t translate. In trying to create a façade of a nuclear American family, Jackson forces Grace to adhere to stereotypical traditional tropes, which is something that no woman can truly meet in this day and age.
Sissy Spacek rejects the bitchy mother-in-law tropes too frequently seen. Her performance as Jackson’s mother, Pam, is small but mighty, serving as an ally for Grace. Where other filmmakers would craft a character that is “out to get” Grace, Pam is understanding and concerned. She understands firsthand what Grace is going through in a way Jackson can’t because she too has suffered from the same pressures of motherhood. There’s a melancholy in Spacek’s performance as she is unable to stop Grace’s suffering, even when giving her the knowledge from hindsight.
Seamus McGarvey’s cinematography plays a big part in encapsulating Grace’s slip from reality as her depression and hopelessness builds. McGarvey uses open spaces to highlight the terror in the unknown. The most heartbreaking moments in the film come when the camera lingers on Grace’s face a little too long where we begin to feel her discomfort and misplacement. There is also a powerlessness as the camera sits almost at a distance like an observer, unable to intervene and make things better. This adds to the frustration that the characters feel as they succumb to their struggles.
While Die My Love is not an easy watch in any way, it’s unflinching look into postnatal depression and the realities of motherhood will undoubtedly leave its mark on you. Lawrence delivers a career-best performance that feels raw and fearless, making Grace not only a fully-rounded character, but one of the most “human” characters put to screen. Hopefully we won’t have to wait another decade for Ramsay’s next film because her strength to explore these issues in such an artistic and complex way creates some of the best characters we have seen in cinema.
Bugonia was always bound to be one of the year’s wackiest films and boy, it did not disappoint. The film follows conspiracy theorist cousins, Teddy (Jesse Plemons) and Don (Aiden Delbis), who abduct pharmaceutical CEO, Michelle (Emma Stone) in the belief she is actually an alien on a mission to destroy the human race.
The film is a remake of the 2003 South Korean film Save the Green Planet! with the script written by Will Tracy and helmed by avant garde visionary, Yorgos Lathimos. What makes Lathimos one of the most exciting filmmakers working today is the way he creates surrealist immersive worlds that never feel too far away. They are places that terrify and intrigue in equal measure, and his penchant for unknown motivations make his worlds seem claustrophobic, even when incorporating astronomical themes.
It’s wonderful to see how Jesse Plemons’ career has skyrocketed over the years. Following his Best Actor win at Cannes for Kinds of Kindness, Plemons reunites with Lathimos as Teddy, the hopeless conspiracy theorist who thinks Michelle is a member of the Andromedan race and has elected himself as a spokesperson for the human race to save the Earth. What makes Plemons’ performance so captivating is how normalised his theories have become from the offset. The audience is immediately introduced into Teddy and Don’s mundane lifestyle which is contrasted with the wealth and excess of Michelle’s. The scenes in which Teddy emotionally manipulates Don into going along with his plans are uncomfortable because we know that Teddy truly believes in what he is saying, despite the absurdity of his theories. Counteract these moments of dominance with the inferiority he feels in scenes with Michelle, who uses her influence and intellect to challenge Teddy’s arguments. Plemons really shines during the dinner scene where the tension between Teddy and Michelle reaches its boiling point and he resorts to physically attacking Michelle when it’s clear that he is losing control of the conversation.
If Teddy’s life is stunted by his inability to gain respect and followship from others, then Auxolith CEO Michelle Fuller is his polar opposite. Emma Stone’s performance is immediately commanding and unpredictable as the audience teeters between believing whether she is an alien or not. As we see Michelle’s morning routine, we can see her confidence and assertiveness. She lives a high-pressured life, but she makes it seem effortless. If Poor Things’ protagonist, Bella Baxter, gave Stone the opportunity to play a character who was on a journey of self-discover, then Bugonia is a role that sees that discovery in fruition. When captured, Michelle uses her intelligence to assess and determine weaknesses in her captors. Stone’s physical transformation for this role cannot be overlooked either. Michelle’s appearance is completely changed as the events of the film unfold, her hair is shaved off and her high-end clothes become ruined and replaced with gaudy floral dresses. What makes Michelle such an engaging character is how she has different approaches with Teddy and Don. She knows that Teddy can be thwarted by intelligence, while Don is more susceptible to emotional discussions in a bid to save her life.
Aiden Delbis makes a fantastic debut as Teddy’s cousin, Don. Delbis holds his own against Hollywood heavyweights Stone and Plemons, with his onscreen chemistry with the latter being a highlight of the film. As the conflict between Teddy and Michelle grows and Teddy delves deeper into his rabbit hole of theories, we see Don struggling as the situation becomes too much for him. It’s one thing for him to go along with the plans, but when they are put into action and things become “real”, it’s evident that he doesn’t fully align with Teddy’s point of view. Where Teddy believes that Michelle is an alien, Don’s autism makes him feel like he doesn’t belong in such an unfair and unequal world. Teddy is the only person he has and he wonders if there are extraterrestrial beings in a bid to find somewhere that will accept him. Teddy and Michelle represent the worst extremes in the world, while Don is forced to help clean up the mess. Delbis is the heart of the film and brings a real human element to the story.
The score is another triumph from Jerskin Fendrix. Much like the conflicting characters, the music flits from one extreme to the other. What starts with natural and classical sounds with nature imagery is juxtaposed with futuristic synths as the film divulges into Teddy’s radical ideas. Even when there are moments of calm visually, Fendrix’s score is on hand to maintain the suspense, keeping the audience on their toes.
Bugonia is proof of the magic formula that Lathimos and Stone have perfected. While it may not have the grandeur of Poor Things or the historical levity of The Favourite, Bugonia still concerns itself with themes found in Lathimos’ filmography. On a larger scale, it’s a film about inequality and how those at the top hold an extortionate amount of power and influence. This then trickles down to those at the bottom of the chain who find solace online and venture down unfounded and dangerous routes. What Lathimos presents us is the worst of society from the top and the bottom.
Paul Thomas Anderson is one of the best directors working today because you never know what to expect with each film and One Battle After Another is no exception. Heralded as the best film of the year so far by numerous outlets, One Battle After Another is an unnerving portrait of the current political landscape, as far-right militia crack down on illegal immigration sparking violent protests from the far-left revolutionary group, the French 75. The film follows paranoid drug addict, Pat Calhoun (Leonardo DiCaprio), who must tap back into his French 75 training when his daughter, Willa (Chase Infiniti), is being hunted by the corrupt Colonel Steven J. Lockjaw (Sean Penn).
Marking his second Thomas Pynchon adaptation, director Paul Thomas Anderson lifts the basic plot of the novel, Vineland, from its Reagan-era setting and brings it to the 21st century. The result of which is an unpredictable study of political and socioeconomic conflicts in America that bubbles in tension as it interweaves characters meticulously until the fiery climactic third act. The fusion of Pynchon’s psychedelic wasteland and Anderson’s sharp attention to detail pushes One Battle into a league of its own and ultimately brings us a new kind of “epic” movie: one that is doused in dystopia nostalgia and intricate character dynamics.
Leonardo DiCaprio proves yet again why he is one of the best leading men in Hollywood. He is a tour de force as paranoid, drug addict, Pat Calhoun, a former bomb expert for revolutionary group French 75. Having worked with Martin Scorsese on a third of films released this century so far, DiCaprio has become synonymous with the realist gritty roles expected from a Scorsese feature. However, we’ve also seen DiCaprio venture into unfamiliar territory with highlights including his turns in Quentin Tarantino’s films Django Unchained and Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. However, it’s this performance as hopeless Pat that feels the most realised and distant from DiCaprio’s tenure in the 90s. We’ve seen him shine in comedies before with Wolf of Wall Street often cited as the film that should have won him the Oscar, but there is a tenderness in Pat’s character as he tries to do the right thing and constantly fails. His instincts fail him as he raises his daughter, Willa (Chase Infiniti) as a single parent following the abrupt departure of his partner, Perfidia Beverly Hills (Teyana Taylor) and spends his days drinking and getting high. You could argue that Pat’s character is cut from the same cloth as Joaquin Phoenix’s Doc in Inherent Vice. Both characters are conceptualised by Thomas Pynchon and realised by Anderson, but it goes beyond the aesthetic and feel of the great days of old. Pat and Doc both strive to create a better world, but in doing so find themselves against the sheer corruption of government, leading to a headfirst leap into conspiracy followed by drug-fuelled madness. Pat may seem cartoonish to an extent, but the sincerity with which DiCaprio plays him and that unkillable urge to better the world is the driving force that allows the film to deliver it’s message flawlessly.
In true PTA-style, we have a supporting cast of eccentrics with the standout being Sean Penn as the corrupt Colonel Lockjaw. Penn’s performance is so over the top with his physicality and mannerisms, that it’s hard to take Lockjaw seriously. Often used as the butt of a joke or the punching bag for the sinister Christmas Club, you can sense that Lockjaw is being pushed to his limit. We see flickers of darkness throughout the film, but it is during the final act when we see Lockjaw’s true nature and Penn brings the monstrous side of Lockjaw brilliantly. I don’t doubt that Penn will receive nominations across the board with a big chance of sweeping. This feels like a comeback in a way as Penn is extremely selective with his roles, but hopefully we can see more PTA collaborations in the future.
Another phenomenal supporting turn is from Benicio del Toro, who plays Pat’s friend, Sensei Sergio. He is viewed as a de facto leader in the immigrant community, always striving to help those in need. Once he realises Pat’s past affiliations, Sensei endeavours to help any way he can, understanding that their core values align. The opposite of Lockjaw in every sense, del Toro’s performance is minimalist and subtle but holds the same amount of impact with less time than Penn. With so much shine on Penn’s performance, it would be remiss to overlook the astonishing work del Toro does here and he more than deserves inclusion in Best Supporting Actor discussions.
There’s nothing better than seeing someone absolutely smash their breakthrough role and Chase Infiniti’s performance as Willa is among the best in recent years. Not only does she hold her own against industry veterans with ease, her performance brings the heart to the film. We see Willa try to break free from her father’s restrictions with success and failure in equal measure. Despite growing up in a community that society would deem “outcasts”, Willa herself is seen as an outsider to her peers, making her an isolated individual. The main frame of the film sees Willa come to terms with her identity and the mystery of her mother’s whereabouts and how that legacy determines her place in the world. It could be argued that One Battle is a coming-of-age film as Willa’s “battle” is building her own identity as she enters adulthood.
Jonny Greenwood returns to score the film, bringing a 1970s soft-rock vibe that feels nostalgic and scenic. As expected from Greenwood’s work with PTA, the music works with the imagery, masterfully layering sounds to build tension which contrasts with the quieter music during scenes with lots of dialogue. There is a timeless quality to Greenwood’s score, despite its 1970s-inspired sound. At times mellow with vast scenery while at others, jaunty and infused with espionage during protest scenes, Greenwood finds a dynamic balance that is offbeat and complimentary at the same time.
If Greenwood’s score is the fire then Michael Bauman’s cinematography is most definitely the match. The use of wide shots that linger elevates the suspense and unpredictability of the film. We, the audience, can only sit and watch these events unfold with an unflinching and unfiltered perspective. Bauman manages to use open spaces in a way that feels awfully claustrophobic. No matter whether the characters are meandering round the desert or huddled in tiny interrogation rooms, there is always a sense of entrapment that allows for no escape. The use of the camera when Willa is driving up and down hills with plenty of blind spots is nail bitingly brilliant and fully immerses the audience into the uncertainty of where the road – literally and figuratively – will lead.
One Battle After Another may just be the film that gets Paul Thomas Anderson his well-deserved moment of glory after decades of impeccable output. One Battle is a searing commentary on contemporary America and thanks to a plethora of memorable performances, an impactful score and ingenious cinematography, this is definitely a film that demands repeat viewings.
