Tag: Hollywood

Categories
Uncategorised

Top 5 Jennifer Lawrence Performances

Jennifer Lawrence is an actress whose star has risen exponentially since her breakthrough performance in Winter’s Bone in 2010. What has made Lawrence such a success both commercially and critically is her versatility and willingness to push herself by exploring different genres and refusing to be typecast. Her incredibly successful career has seen her nominated for 4 Oscars, winning one for Silver Linings Playbook in 2013, making her the second-youngest recipient of the Best Leading Actress award in Oscar history. After taking a short break between 2018 and 2021, she returned in one of the leading roles in Adam McKay’s star-studded black comedy, Don’t Look Up, starring alongside the likes of Leonardo DiCaprio, Meryl Streep and Jonah Hill to name a few.

As with any top 5 list, it’s always incredibly difficult to narrow it down, especially when discussing someone as diverse and charismatic as Lawrence because there are so many performances to consider. However, this list demonstrates her range and her ability to bring out the strengths and flaws of her character. From leading action franchises to complex dramatic character studies and everything in between, Lawrence has shown so much in her 15-year career and it’s exciting to see where her career will take her in the future now that she has returned from taking a well-deserved short break.

Here are my top 5 performances by Jennifer Lawrence in chronological order:

Winter’s Bone (2010)

Lawrence’s breakthrough came in 2010 when she starred in the independent film, Winter’s Bone. The film follows 17-year-old Ree (Lawrence) who is the main caregiver for her mentally ill mother (Valerie Richards) and also looks after her younger siblings by teaching them how to fend for themselves in the Ozark Mountain wilderness. Winter’s Bone is magical to watch because Lawrence is so magnetic and charismatic that her impending rise to stardom was inevitable. The film is regarded as one of the biggest indie successes as it was made on a $2 million budget and made over $16 million in the box office, resulting in a slew of Oscar nominations, including Lawrence’s first nomination for Best Leading Actor. Even though she didn’t win, she was constantly viewed as one to watch, and with the upcoming Hunger Games due to be released, Winter’s Bone is an excellent beginning for what can only be described as an incredible career.

Silver Linings Playbook (2013)

The film that won Lawrence her Oscar and cemented her place as a Hollywood staple was Silver Linings Playbook. Marking the first of three collaborations with David O’Russell as well as the first of six collaborations with co-star Bradley Cooper, Lawrence plays Tiffany, a widow who struggles with her mental health following the death of her husband and finds herself unemployed after sleeping with everyone in her office. Silver Linings Playbook is one of the best films when it comes to discussing mental health and this is thanks to the nuanced performances by Lawrence and Cooper, whose character Pat has been diagnosed with bipolar. What makes this performance special and incredible is considering how young Lawrence was when the film was made and released as the character of Tiffany was 40 in the book but was re-written to be younger to suit Lawrence’s age. Despite this age difference, Lawrence still provides the depth to the character and while the specific nature of Tiffany’s diagnosis is not discussed in the film, Lawrence’s nuanced performance shines through and we still emote and feel Tiffany’s struggles.

The Hunger Games: Catching Fire (2013)

One of the roles that helped Lawrence make her mark in Hollywood was her turn as protagonist Katniss Everdeen in The Hunger Games franchise. The series follows Katniss, a young woman who finds herself in the deadly titular games in which competitors have to fight to the death in a bid to be the last one standing. The Hunger Games: Catching Fire is one of those rare occurrences where the sequel is better than the original and this is partially thanks to Lawrence’s impeccable performance. This isn’t to say that Lawrence’s performance is anything less than brilliant in The Hunger Games, but there is a maturity and nuance that she provides in Catching Fire that could arguably be thanks to the vast experience that she gained between the films. Catching Fire is the strongest book in the series and the film is no exception as we see Katniss conflicted between her role as provider for her family and helping lift her family from the poverty line and her position as the face of the rebellion against the evil President Snow (Donald Sutherland). The opening scene in which she encounters President Snow in District 12 and is threatened is one of the most intense scenes in any young adult adaptation. The Hunger Games: Catching Fire isn’t afraid of exploring more complicated themes such as loss, grief, and internal conflict and Lawrence truly becomes Katniss in this instalment.

mother! (2017)

Lawrence’s most controversial performance is arguably her best. Playing the titular character, Lawrence’s performance delves deep into the psychological trauma presented in the film as her character’s life begins to fall apart. The film was directed and written by Darren Aronofsky who is known for pushing boundaries and while his previous horror, Black Swan was more vast in its locations and scope, mother! is more contained and is set within the one house, adding to the claustrophobia and entrapment that the character feels. Mother lives with Him (Javier Bardem) in a tale that serves as an allegory for the Bible and as Him gains more followers beginning with man (Ed Harris) and woman (Michelle Pfeiffer), life spirals out of control to the point of tragedy and destruction. mother! received a polarised reception on release and is still discussed to this day thanks to its topical discussions and the extreme violence and chaos that ensues. However, Lawrence’s affecting and provoking performance cannot be denied and will go down as a career best. You can read my full review for mother! here.

Don’t Look Up (2021)

One of the most talked about films of 2021 was Adam McKay’s black comedy Don’t Look Up, which boasted one of the starriest casts in recent years. Led by Jennifer Lawrence and Leonardo DiCaprio, Don’t Look Up split opinion with audiences responding more positively than critics. While Don’t Look Up has its flaws, one of its strengths lies in Lawrence’s hilarious performance as she appears to have the best lines and even outperforms DiCaprio (which is never an easy feat). Lawrence plays scientist Kate Dibiasky who discovers the comet that threatens to destroy the Earth within months and provides her signature deadpan humour throughout with the best joke in the film being her confusion over a staff member at the White House charging her for food that is actually free. You can read my full review for Don’t Look Up here.

After taking a break for a few years, it seems as though Lawrence is back and better than ever as she has a slew of projects lined up for the future including Adam McKay’s biopic, Bad Blood, in which she plays the fraudulent businesswoman, Elizabeth Holmes and Luca Guadagnino’s adaptation of the novel, Burial Rites, which explores the last woman executed for murder in Iceland to name just a few. Lawrence remains one of the most successful and popular actors in Hollywood regardless of her break, proving just how talented and charismatic she is.

What are your favourite Jennifer Lawrence performances? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

BFI Flare Festival 2021: Jump, Darling

BFI Flare Festival is all about showcasing the newest films that explore LGBT+ issues and the variety this year follows all paths of life from all corners of the globe. Opening the festival this year is Phil Connell’s Jump, Darling. The film follows Russell (Thomas Duplessie), a drag queen who moves back in with his grandmother, Margaret (Oscar winner Cloris Leachman) after his breakup. As Russell tries to decide what he wants to do with his life, he also finds himself taking care of Margaret who is reluctant to go into a care home despite her ailing health. The film was one of the last films Leachman starred in before she passed away earlier this year.

Connell’s screenplay and direction is nicely paced and he manages to get fully realised characters in its short 90 minute run. Despite the difference in lifestyles between Russell and Margaret, their similarities begin to show as both are trapped in their particular situations. Where Maragret is physically trapped as she is unable to leave the house, Russell is finding himself unable to fulfil his potential as a successful actor and feels the pressure of failure from family and friends. The scenes where Connell’s direction really shines is when Russell performs lip syncs as his drag alter ego, Fishy Falters. These scenes allow Connell to shift to a more experimental style of filmmaking as he mixes in differing camera angles and lighting that takes Russell out of his reality when he becomes Fishy Falters.

Duplessie is fantastic in the leading role as Russell and stands his own against Oscar winner Leachman. We first see Russell in a successful nightclub prepping for his drag debut as Fishy Falters. After stumbling on his way to the stage and leaving the club, he breaks up with his partner who thinks he is should pursue acting as he doesn’t think drag is a worthy career. When he moves in with his grandmother, we begin to see the clash between the two worlds that he seems to inhabit. Where Duplessie really shines is showing the difference between Russell’s life as a man who is trying to find his way versus his performances as the super confident drag queen, Fishy Falters. Duplessie’s stellar lip syncing is on par with the performances we see from professional drag Queens throughout the film.

As expected, Leachman is brilliantly cast as Margaret, the family matriarch who simply refuses to be put in a care home despite pressure from her daughter. Unable to drive or properly care for herself, Russell’s arrival brings a certain amount of freedom as Maragret begins to encounter old friends and start to find the joy in her life again. With Leachman having a stellar career playing strong women, Jump, Darling is no exception as we see Margaret grasping at the little control she has left. Wanting to cater to her grandson and encourage him to push out of his comfort zones, Margaret is quite a confrontational character but she also has a softer side when it comes to Russell. The scenes between Leachman and Duplessie are great to watch and even in her twilight years, Leachman shows that her star quality never went away.

One thing that I thought was particularly great in this film was the editing. Lev Lewis edits perfectly by utilising a more traditional cut in the scenes with the domestic troubles but then changing to a more exciting cut during the musical scenes. This helps to shift the genre of the film from drama to musical and keeps the film unpredictable and attentive. Lewis’ editing works perfectly to show the two worlds that Russell lives in and perfectly chronicles the emotional journey he takes.

Overall, Jump, Darling marks a great start to this year’s BFI Flare Festival and marks the start to a wonderful career for Duplessie whilst also being a lovely swansong for Hollywood icon, Leachman. Connell uses the minimalist surroundings and limited characters allows the two protagonists to shine and puts their acting at the centre. The chemistry between Duplessie and Leachman feels natural and the screenplay allows the relationship to develop naturally without resorting to any exposition. Jump, Darling is a film that will leave you laughing, crying and every other emotion in between.

Jump, Darling is opening the BFI Flare Festival.

Categories
Uncategorised

Judy (2019)

Based on the last years and concerts of Judy Garland’s life, Judy is one of the most talked about films going into this awards season thanks to the starring turn by Renée Zellweger in the titular role. Biopics have always been a popular go-to for actors who want to subvert casting types and show their range and this seems to be no exception for Zellweger who foregoes her famed reputation as the comedic gem in Bridget Jones. As an avid fan of Judy Garland, I was really interested to see whether Zellweger pulls it off and it truly is a film that revolves around the performance and acts as an Oscar lull for the actress who has mainly stayed out of the spotlight for years. Directed by Rupert Goold, a director renowned for his theatre work with a script written by Tom Edge based on the musical The End of the Rainbow by Peter Quilter, Judy is the heartbreaking reality of a faded star who longs to stay in the spotlight but is plighted by a lifetime of abuse which finally catches up with her in the form drug and alcohol abuse. Flashbacks to her youth which see Darci Shaw play a young Garland (superbly I might add) in which she is constantly berated for her appearance whilst also experiencing harassment, forced drug use and general anxieties in terms of how she must eat and act at all times.

Goold’s direction is intensely focused on its star. When we see Judy perform for the first time, the camera never leaves her, instead focusing on each movement and mannerism that Zellweger conjures up. There is a distinct use of palette used in the film as the Hollywood scenes of Judy’s youth are bright and playful whereas the London setting for her concerts in the present day is darker and drearier. The illusion of fame has long since faded which Goold brings across. The decision to bring in events that didn’t happen in real life is something that I am unsure about. A life as eventful as Judy Garland’s isn’t in need of any fictionalisation and I feel that the inclusion of these scenes detracts from the film. The main fictionalised event was the inclusion of gay couple, Dan (Andy Nyman) and Stan (Daniel Cerqueira) who wait for Judy at the stage door and have dinner with her in their flat. I understand the inclusion of these characters as it is a way to show Judy’s support for the gay community and the performances from Nyman and Cerqueira are heartfelt and sincere. My only concern is the ending scene in which they start a singalong to “Over the Rainbow” when Judy breaks down on stage. This event didn’t happen and the effect that it had as the theatre audience all joined in made it a bit cringey to watch, knowing that this didn’t happen in reality. Judy’s longing to be remembered and her final lines do pack a punch though as you feel the impending fate that awaits her as she dies 6 months after the concerts. There are plenty of moments in the film, particularly the Hollywood scenes, that are fantastically shot and Goold’s experience as a theatre director comes into play. His focus on the character’s expressions and use of light and shade is phenomenal and it’s exciting to see what he picks as his next cinematic project.

judy4

Now onto the star of the show. Renée Zellweger is nothing less than stellar as Judy. The Judy she plays is one that looks back on past fame and fortune whilst dealing with the reality that she does not have the same financial luxury or influence she once did. The only way she is able to keep herself financially afloat is by performing in London where her fan base is loyal. Garland is a character with many layers and Zellweger manages to communicate this with a melancholy glance. The physicality of the role may not seem demanding at first but particularly when performing, you see the physical struggles Judy has. Zellweger’s Judy is one who cares about her impact and legacy, wanting to ensure that she will be remembered. Her motivation is ensuring financial security so she can spend time with her children who are living in the US with their father, Judy’s ex-husband Sidney Luft (Rufus Sewell). There are so many scenes that are captivating and it’s mainly when she is on stage. The passion that Zellweger throws into the role is spilled out heart and soul into the songs. Offstage, Judy is disabled by her mental health and increased alcohol consumption. Her anxiety overrides everything causing a huge lack of confidence and yet she longs for validation and the applause. Her refusal to allow her younger children to enter the world of showbiz only demonstrates the hatred for her own upbringing and eventual rise to stardom. She longs for the normal life but can never truly have one now.

The supporting cast is led by Michael Gambon and Jessie Buckley as theatre owner, Bernard Delfont and assistant Rosalyn Wilder, respectively. It’s always nice to see veteran actors acting alongside rising stars and both do a wonderful job. At the end of the day, their roles are to support Zellweger’s starring turn. This is a film that has an intense focus on Judy. There are very few scenes that don’t have Judy in them meaning that this makes it hard for other people to truly shine because she does grab the attention. But as I said, in a film like this, we’re not meant to focus on these supporting roles. That being said, there is a scene between Judy and Rosalyn that is particularly fiery when the latter tries to encourage the former to go onstage. Judy lashes out and claims that Rosalyn doesn’t care about her which to an extent is true. She may seem that she does care but at the end of the day, Judy’s wellbeing comes second to her concerts. Rosalyn’s job is to ensure that Judy makes the concerts on time.

judy-garland-renee-zellweger.jpg

Judy is a film with its flaws but much like the film’s subject, it certainly puts on a show. Zellweger has made herself a serious contender this awards season and definitely could walk away with Oscar number two. I think it’s a film worth watching just for the performance but the direction should not be overlooked either. In a post #metoo world, it’s horrific and tragic to see how Judy was treated from a young age as she was verbally and physically abused and forced to fit an ideal that she did not naturally conform to. She clearly despised and reviled any attempts to change her and yet was forced to hate her background. Comparing the two Judys we see in the film, we see that culmination of abuse from all angles in Zellweger’s.

What did you think of Judy? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Quentin Tarantino: Film Ranking

If you asked a group of people for their favourite living filmmaker, there is a strong chance that a large percentage of them will say the name: Quentin Tarantino. One of the greatest and most original minds to come out of the film industry in the history of film, Tarantino practically defined 90s cinema with his look into the gangster underworld of Los Angeles. His films are known for their strong use of language, gratuitous violence and the iconic writing style that Tarantino brings to his dialogue. The owner of two Best Original Screenplay Oscars (for Pulp Fiction and Django Unchained), he has yet to win a Best Director gong. With the release of this year’s Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, could this be another successful awards season for Tarantino?

Tarantino had always stated that he intended to make 10 features. Counting Kill Bill as one, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood would be his ninth and, therefore, penultimate picture. I thought it would be a great celebration of his work to revisit his films old and new and see how I would stack them up when compared to each other.

Here are the reviews for the films of Quentin Tarantino:

Reservoir Dogs (1992)

Possibly one of the most (if not the most) iconic debuts ever to be delivered by a filmmaker, Reservoir Dogs follows a group of men who are given colour code names such as Mr. Orange and Mr. Brown and their attempt to carry out a diamond heist. A pretty simple plot but the genius of the film comes from Tarantino’s decision to not show the heist itself. What we are presented with is the run-up to the heist and it’s consequences when it goes wrong. Featuring a brilliant cast including Harvey Keitel, Michael Madsen and Tim Roth. My favourite performance comes from Steve Buscemi who plays the fearfully paranoid Mr. Pink. Among the men, Pink is clearly the outsider from the beginning when he refuses to give the waitress a tip. The script may seem simple but it is anything but. There is a rhythm and style that would come to define a Tarantino feature such as extensive allegories and numerous pop culture references. The soundtrack for this film has also become somewhat of a legend in its own right and has become a reference point for a lot of modern filmmakers. Tarantino himself claims that this film is the closest to being a “perfect” film which although I see the argument for, I would say that he has managed to make even better films. It would be a shame to think that his first film was his best.

Pulp Fiction (1994)

If you had to say one film that defines the 1990s, I think the majority of people would say Pulp Fiction. From the iconic poster design, extreme violence and brilliant dialogue, Pulp Fiction catapulted Tarantino to the top of the A list, winning him the Palme d’Or at Cannes Film Festival as well as an Academy Award for Best Original Screenplay. Starring John Travolta and Samuel L. Jackson as suave hitmen Vincent Vega and Jules Winnifield who work for drug lord Marsellus Wallace (Ving Rhames) and his cocaine-addicted wife, Mia (Uma Thurman in her most recognisable role). Pulp Fiction is bigger and better than its predecessor with an even more starry cast, bigger budget and killer direction. Even 25 years on, it is still commonly referenced for its costumes and standout scenes such as Jules’ biblical recitation before blowing the brains out of a man who attempted to double-cross Wallace. It is undoubtedly Jackson who is the shining star of this gangster masterpiece as he brings his trademark attitude. You know you did a great job when the person who beat you to the Oscar says that you should have won. There’s a reason why Pulp Fiction marked the start of the iconic collaborations between Tarantino and Jackson. Their love of action, violence and strong language makes the perfect pairing. Besides every time Jackson is onscreen, my favourite scene is Christopher Walken’s iconic monologue as Captain Koons, an Army veteran who survived the war and is gifting his son, Butch (Chandler Lindauer and Brue Willis playing the younger and older versions, respectively) his prized watch. Only Walken could deliver the monologue with the sincerity and conviction that his does.

Jackie Brown (1997)

Jackie Brown is one of those films that finds itself among the top of people’s favourite Tarantino films or worst. Sadly, it is among the bottom of my list but not because it is a bad film by any means. It is simply because of its nature as an adaptation. When I watch a Tarantino, I want to see the usual quirks in the dialogue which I think isn’t there as much as other films. Following Pam Grier as the titular air stewardess who becomes embroiled in a smuggling scandal, Tarantino relies on a great cast to carry out this complex web and pulls it off which include Samuel L. Jackson with a fantastic haircut. Known for her starring roles in Blaxploitation flicks, Grier herself is amazing and had such a powerful presence onscreen. She doesn’t just give a great performances, she becomes Jackie. It’s one of my favourite performances in the Tarantino catalogue but I just feel that there are elements such as the odd pacing that let the film as a whole down. It would be nice to see Tarantino reunite with Grier on a new project, perhaps his 10th (and supposedly last) feature. The film is grounded in reality a bit more than the others and I think the fact that any director could have made this film is why it ranks low. When I watch a Tarantino film, I want it to be distinctively Tarantino but I don’t get that from this film and as previously stated, I think that comes from the fact that it is an adaptation. The man thrives from his originality and it’s what the audience loves.

Kill Bill: Volume 1 (2003)

I remember watching Kill Bill for the first time and being blown away by the strength of the protagonist. The film follows the vengeful ex-assassin The Bride who seeks revenge on her former colleagues when they kill her wedding rehearsal party on the orders of Bill, the man who runs the group. Kill Bill is intended to be watched as one film but due to running length was divided into two volumes. The first volume is seen as the Eastern installment as The Bride ventures to Japan to face the first assassin O-Ren Oshii (Lucy Liu). There are so many reasons why my love for this film is unequivocal such as the clear appreciation for Japanese cinema and culture, the amazing use of animation within the film and most of all, the wide abundance of fleshed out female characters. This film is known for its extreme violence and high body count but don’t let this put you off. Playing the woman who lost everything, including her unborn baby, Thurman’s performance is undeniably ruthless, unapologetic and emotionally charged to the max. Even though she seems unbreakable and unemotional on the surface but you sense her pain underneath the surface from the opening scene with Vernita Green (Vivica A. Fox). Tarantino uses various elements such as sound mixing and colour giving the film its flamboyance and elevating it beyond realism and into fantasy.

Kill Bill: Volume 2 (2004)

Following on from Vol 1, Kill Bill: Vol 2 takes us back to America where the Bride has the second half of her list left to kill in the form of Bill’s failure of a brother, Budd (Michael Madsen), the merciless Elle Driver (Daryl Hannah) and Bill himself (David Carradine). This installment has a larger focus on the Bride’s background before the massacre took place and her journey to becoming an assassin. I love how both films have become a genre of their own. The body count may be a fraction of its predecessor but it still includes some of the most terrifying scenes in film (insert buried alive segment here) and is captivating in its own way. We see the Bride’s emotional journey and her guard slips as she makes some unexpected discoveries in her quest for blood. I think that together, Kill Bill makes for a fantastic saga and would definitely be among my favourite films of the 21st century so far.

Death Proof (2007)

I know there are some people that wouldn’t put Death Proof in the list due to it being part of a two-part feature titled Grindhouse with fellow director and friend, Robert Rodriguez directing Planet Terror (2007). Death Proof is a Texan action led by Kurt Russell as a stuntman who murders women with his car. The film is split into two parts with one group of women’s fates determined the first half and another group in the second half. Death Proof is often viewed as Tarantino’s worst and it is but it’s not a bad film. It is entertaining and Russell is brilliant as the killer in the “death-proof” car. It’s not as complex as other Tarantino films and doesn’t perhaps have the gumption or wow factor that the others have. That being said, for what it wants to be, it delivers in spades. The soundtrack is great and Rose McGowan and Mary Elizabeth Winstead are great in their roles as Pam and Lee, respectively. It’s pretty great that Tarantino and Rodriguez cast McGowan in a leading role in both films to spite Harvey Weinstein for what he did to her. McGowan shines in both films and it would be great to see her make a return to films in roles as amazing as the Grindhouse duo.

Inglourious Basterds (2009)

The first Tarantino film I watched and boy was it a great pick. Undoubtedly one of the best opening scenes in film history, Tarantino manages to create tension with a glass of milk. The film is a reimagining of Nazi-occupied France during the war with Brad Pitt playing Aldo Raine who leads a group of men known as “The Basterds” who are set on killing Nazis and collecting their scalps. Inglourious Basterds also includes what I would argue is Tarantino’s best character today in the erringly charismatic SS Officer, Hans Landa. Played spectacularly by Christoph Waltz in a role that would see him in his Hollywood breakthrough and take home every Supporting Actor Award including the Cannes Film Festival, BAFTA and the Academy Award. Landa is a character who commands your attention. He’s despicable and manipulative, the sociopathic changes are intriguing to watch such as him loving his nickname “Jew Hunter” in the opening scene when intimidating a local farmer, to despising the name when realising that the Nazis are set on losing the war. His motives and outlook can never be understood because he is such a whirlwind character. He seems to take his job seriously one moment then not at all the next and flits the fate of others with ease, not finding it difficult to kill if he sees fit. I don’t think there’s a character that has unsettled a global audience as much as Hans Landa has and yet you long for him to be on the screen because the character is so engaging. Tarantino’s screenwriting is possibly his best, which he clearly knows from the final frame when Aldo looks into the camera and says “this might be my masterpiece”.

Django Unchained (2012)

Bringing his love for spaghetti westerns to the frontline for this Civil War epic, Tarantino’s 3 hour Django Unchained follows Jamie Foxx as the titular character and his quest to find his wife Broomhilda (Kerry Washington) in the Deep South were slavery is very much a thriving business. With the help of bounty hunter Dr King Schultz (Christoph Waltz), Django’s adventure sees Tarantino using an endless amount of fake blood and a controversial multitude of n-words throughout which faced criticism from individuals such as Spike Lee. I do think this is a film plagued with indulgence and excess in its violence, language and numerous endings but it does have very strong points. The cast are perfect in their roles particularly Christoph Waltz as Schultz and Leonardo DiCaprio as plantation owner Calvin Candie. Waltz is charismatic and charming as a man set on freeing slaves and hunting killers and would go on to win a second Best Supporting Actor gong although I personally think his role is a lead not supporting performance. DiCaprio’s performance on the other side is chilling and captivating as he relishes in torturing the slaves.

The Hateful Eight (2015)

Concluding the western trilogy in Tarantino’s catalogue, we venture to Wyoming in the aftermath of the Civil War. There’s a heavy blizzard and eight murderous brutes are trapped in Minnie’s Haberdashery including the honourable John “The Hangman” Ruth (Kurt Russell), country hunter Major Marquis Warren (Samuel L. Jackson) and a career-best from Jennifer Jason Leigh as the disgustingly brilliant Daisy Domergue who John is bringing to Red Rock to hang. Like all Tarantino films, this one is also a mash-up of genres. It is primarily western but is also murder mystery, comedy and thriller. The film’s composer, Ennio Morricone stated that he wrote the score for a horror film which would end up being the film’s strongest point and leading to Morricone’s long-awaited Oscar. It’s a truly brilliant soundtrack and elevates the rhythm of the dialogue which is so important in the moments of extreme tension. Tarantino’s writing is tight and every character has been fleshed out, admittedly some more than others, but each one is memorable in their own way. It’s an interesting inclusion and the film shows a maturity in Tarantino’s filmmaking. There is violence, granted, as expected but Tarantino is more focused on his script and positioning of characters than the actual violence.

Once Upon a Time in Hollywood (2019)

I have already written an extensive review on this one (which you can read here) so I won’t go into too much detail. What I will say is that it has a very good chance of scoring some nominations and potential wins going into awards season. It’s nice seeing Tarantino returning to California for his penultimate film and it seems like a film that he was destined to make. The personal touches are definitely here in what seems to be a return to the place where he grew up.

So we’re all up to date and I eagerly await to see what Tarantino has up his sleeve for his tenth and supposed final feature. Undoubtedly, it will be one of the biggest events in film history with actors and crew members alike clambering at the chance to work with him. There’s only one Tarantino and there certainly won’t be another director like him again.

With all that said and done, here is my final ranking:

1) Kill Bill: Volume 1 (2003)

2) Inglourious Basterds (2009)

3) Reservoir Dogs (1992)

4) Pulp Fiction (1994)

5) Kill Bill: Volume 2 (2004)

6) Once Upon a Time in Hollywood (2019)

7) The Hateful Eight (2015)

8) Django Unchained (2012)

9) Jackie Brown (1997)

10) Death Proof (2007)

I know it’s probably shocking having Kill Bill: Volume 1 at the top, but there is something incredibly empowering to me seeing a female character leading a blockbuster four hour saga. I hope people refer back to this when people claim that audiences don’t want to see women in film.

Which Tarantino is your favourite? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (1966)

Based on the Edward Albee stageplay of the same name and marking Mike Nichols’ directorial debut, Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? follows older couple, Martha (Elizabeth Taylor) and George (Richard Burton) as the cracks in their relationship between to crack and crumble with the arrival of newlywed couple Nick (George Segal) and Honey (Sandy Dennis). Very much like the stage production, the film itself is minimalistic and relies on the strength of the actors’ performances which is provided in spades. Elizabeth Taylor who gives her best performance since her Tennesee Williams duo with Cat on a Hot Tin Roof (1958) and Suddenly, Last Summer (1959).

The screenplay is nothing short of amazing. Adapted by Ernest Lehman and there are only minor differences to the film, largely due to location. The Albee play is set only in Martha and George’s house whereas the film gives us a short break in a local roadhouse. It’s not a change that creates any detriment to the film and makes for an opportunity to see how these characters act outside of the comfort of the homely setting. Martha and George’s son is given a name in the film, Nick, in the film adaptation but does not have a name in the play. Again, this is an understandable change as it creates a more emotional charge for the audience as it feels more “real” and relatable when giving him a name. This is similar to the narrator in Truman Capote’s novella Breakfast at Tiffany’s who is given the name, Paul Varjak, which probably makes it easier to confirm especially when protagonist Holly Golightly refers to him as “Fred” after her brother. Changes as small as these don’t compromise the vision of the film and in Lehman’s case, it brings a different dimension to Albee’s play and enhances it in some ways.

Taylor had had her fair share of turbulance with the press and public as her lifestyle and general sexuality was judged and she was seen as a poor role model but this film allows us to see that she isn’t afraid to “deglamourise” and get gritty when needed. She has always been a brilliant actress as previously proven but portraying Martha gives us a chance to see the darker side as Martha manipulates and instigates. She is such an unlikeable character but Taylor has such a presence that it is impossible to feel Martha’s power as she dominates with her physicality. She manipulates the audience into feeling how she wants them to feel, gaining sympathy when needed and repulsion when required. Her performance is nuanced and showed that her career was far from over.

Richard Burton on the other hand plays the oppressed husband waiting to explode as Martha provokes again and again. One of the best actors of the Golden Age of Hollywood, Burton was seriously undervalued during his lifetime and found himself without an Oscar despite seven nominations under his belt. This was indeed one of those performances and despite his brilliance, this really is Taylor’s film. That isn’t to say that his performance isn’t excellent because it is among his best of the best and shows the potential that he was capable of being succombing to alcoholism.

The supporting actors, Segal and Dennis shine as the young couple seemingly in love. The longer they spend time with the miserable elders, they start to see parallels in their own relationship. Sandy Dennis is particularly eyecatching as Honey, the initially subdued housewife who then begins to disagree with her husband. It captured the Academy’s attention as well who award her with the Best Supporting Actress gong. The arrival of the young couple gradually means that the film becomes a game of Chinese whispers as secrets are thrown around to the wrong people and conflicts happen every five minutes. It’s a spiderweb of the complexity of relationship and ultimately seeks to find the foundation of their relationship and destroy it. The ending then leaves the question of what happens next as their years of marriage and lies lay bare in front of them.

The film is a great example that plays can be adapted successfully to the big screen without making big compromises. The film allows the actors to bounce off each other rather than blending into a spectacle. Seeing Taylor and Burton onscreen is always a treat as well and to see such volatile performances makes the film raw and honest. It’s a film that feels enormously progressive for its time as the couple grieve over the death of their son, deal with their bad habits and open up about their tumultuous marriage. The characters are not trying to be likeable because they react as their character would react rather than catering to a Hollywood audience as the big studios would play it.

What do you think of the film? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Top 5 Audrey Hepburn Performances

Known as one of the leading ladies in the Golden Era of Hollywood, Audrey Hepburn epitomised glamour and class in the way she conducted herself onscreen and off. A lady who could do no wrong, there is a reason why Hepburn is truly a cultural icon and this goes beyond her striking features. Winning and Oscar for her debut performance in Roman Holiday as a rebellious princess, Hepburn made her mark in Hollywood instantly carving out a career that shows how consistent and rounded she is as an individual. Even if you haven’t seen her films, you know her face. Ingrained as one of the most important legendary of 20th century cultural icons, Hepburn has become synonymous with the classic Hollywood actress.

Hepburn led a varied career to her showcasing acting, singing, dancing onscreen and then fashion muse, model and UNICEF ambassador offscreen. She has been one of my personal inspirations for many years and one of my favourite actresses of all time.

In celebration of a brilliant and legendary career, here are my top 5 films for the one and only, Audrey Hepburn!

The list (as always) is in chronological order:

Roman Holiday (1953)

The one that started her career off with a bang and an Oscar. Hepburn plays Ann, a Princess who is visiting Rome as part of her royal tour who escapes in the middle of the night to experience life as a normal person. She stumbles across cynical journalist, Joe Bradley (Gregory Peck) and the two spend a day visiting the famous landmarks across the city. Despite being filmed in black and white, the film manages to show us the colourful world of Rome. It’s a film that feels very revolutionary in many ways. From filming on location in Rome (sacrificing a full colour film) and Peck’s insistence that Hepburn receive an equal billing for her performance. Roman Holiday is the perfect film to watch when feeling nostalgic for Old School Hollywood. The chemistry between Peck and Hepburn is evident from the get go and it’s great to see Hepburn playing such a rebellious character who is hugely reluctant to slot into her role as a Princess.

51vMx01966L.jpg

Sabrina (1954)

This is not by any means a popular film beyond the costume designs. It received mixed reviews upon release and tales of the troubled production mainly at the hands of leading man Humphrey Bogart who was consumed by his alcoholism but there is something that is magical to me with Hepburn’s performance in this film. Playing the titular role in this Billy Wilder romance, Hepburn is the daughter of a chauffeur who lives within the estate of a wealthy Larrabee family. She is shipped off to Paris to learn cookery and comes back glamorous and catches the eye of the two wealthy Larrabee sons, the older serious brother, Linus (Bogart) and the young and handsome David (William Holden). It’s a classic Cinderella-esque story with a bit of Pygmalion thrown in and I really love the result personally. I won’t deny that the costumes play a big role because of the history that it sparked the beginning of Hepburn and Hubert de Givenchy’s lifetime friendship and collaboration although Edith Head ultimately received credit for the designs and received the Academy Award for Best Costume Design. But ultimately it is the simplicity and elegance of this film that draws me to it and I am a big fan of Wilder’s direction.

Breakfast at Tiffany’s (1961)

I don’t think it would be possible not to include this on the list. A film that gives not only one of Hepburn’s best performances but also a revolutionary and cultural shift in modern cinema. Based on Truman Capote’s novella of the same name, Hepburn plays protagonist Holly Golightly, a socialite who leads her life carelessly as she shimmies down the street and eats pastries at the windows of Tiffany’s & Co. The film carries a different tone to the book as Holly’s prostitution, alcoholism, drug-use and bisexuality are shunned almost completely and are very briefly referred to at various points. Hepburn’s portrayal of Holly is far from the Marilyn Monroe figure that Capote had pictured in mind when writing the novella but it works for the film. It may not be a faithful adaptation as far as characterisation goes but it captures the struggle to achieve the American Dream beautifully and shows a woman who is willing to do what it takes to achieve security in a world that is cynical and shut off from those who aren’t afforded it at birth.

Charade (1963)

Hepburn is teamed up with Hollywood superstar Cary Grant in this thriller that sees Hepburn play Reggie Lampert, a woman whose life is thrown into chaos as her estranged husband, Charles, is murdered and her belongings are sold off. She is pursued by three criminals who are seeking revenge after Charles stole money from them years before. With the help of Peter Joshua (Grant), an American whose brother was also killed by the same men, they embark on a search for the money. The film becomes a spiral as Peter reveals identity after identity and Reggie becomes less and less sure who to trust. It also shows another side of Hepburn as she hasn’t done many thriller or action films before. As Peter is telling us of his many identities, Reggie keeps her cards close to her chest with Hepburn giving an equally layered performance.

c6.jpg

My Fair Lady (1964)

This may be a controversial choice as it’s widely known that Hepburn didn’t sing in her role as Eliza Doolittle in this musical adaptation of George Bernard-Shaw’s 1913 play Pygmalion that follows the working-class Doolittle as she is taken under the wing of linguist, Henry Higgins (Rex Harrison) who is convinced that he can teach her to talk “proper” and introduce her into high society. There is something remarkable about seeing some so polished as Hepburn playing someone like Eliza which is so different to her other roles. Many critics were disapproving of Hepburn having her singing dubbed but the role of Eliza is much more than her voice, ironically. Hepburn truly becomes Eliza, her physicality and poise is spot on and who can forget the iconic racetrack scene. It’s a film that shows Hepburn’s skill in a more comical film than her other roles and you can tell that she is having a lot of fun in the role.

There are so many other brilliant performances that I haven’t had the chance to include but in a career that is so fantastic, it really was a challenge.

Which Audrey Hepburn films are your favourite? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Top 5 Joaquin Phoenix Performances

Undoubtedly the man of the moment in the film that has the festival circuit buzzing, Joaquin Phoenix is the frontrunner for awards for his titular performance in Todd Phillips’ origin story Joker. During a film climate that seems dominated by superhero films, Joker seems like it is doing something entirely different by twisting the tone and idea of the superhero movie. It feels that after years of playing the underdog in Indie features and his reluctance to entertain the spotlight, the mainstream media has finally caught up. It feels only right that I compile a list of my top 5 performances although it’s very tricky to do so.

Here’s my top 5 in chronological order:

Gladiator (2000)

I never thought Gladiator would be in a top anything list. Truth be told, I find the film overwhelming overall but the one element of it I absolutely love is Joaquin Phoenix’s brilliant performance as the evil Commodus, the power hungry son of Marcus Aurelius who gives power to Maximus (Russell Crowe) until a new empire is formed. His lust for power knows no bounds as he murders his own father and has Maximus arrested. It’s Phoenix’s performance that brings the real depth to this film. He could have easily played this role as a cartoonish villain but instead brings a snakelike presence to the character. His strength comes from the power that others give him rather than strength that he has by himself which comes to fruition in the final fight scene with Maximus.

The Master (2012)

Undoubtedly my favourite Joaquin Phoenix performance, The Master follows ex-marine Freddie Quell (Joaquin Phoenix) as he becomes involved with a cult called The Cause, led by Lancaster Dodd (Philip Seymour Hoffman) and his wife, Peggy (Amy Adams). I won’t dwell too much on this film, mainly because I have written an extensive review for this film (which you can read here). Phoenix brings his A game to his performance and it truly is a career best. The scene where he initially undergoes “Processing” with Lancaster in which his darkest secrets and even darker past are revealed. It’s a brilliantly shot scene that brings together to titans of acting and should have won both Phoenix and Hoffman Academy Awards.

Her (2013)

Spike Jonze’s romantic Her shows a tender side to Phoenix in the role of Theodore Twombly, a depressed soon-to-be divorcé whose job is writing intimate letters for people who are too afraid to do so. He is so emotionally intense and yet detached at the same time as he begins a sexual relationship with his OS (voiced by Scarlett Johansson). Featuring a stellar cast that is rounded off by Amy Adams and Rooney Mara, this was one of the best films of 2013 and brought Spike Jonze a much-deserved Oscar for his screenplay. It’s a saddening portrayal of love and heartbreak in the 21st century. This is a film that easily could have fallen into ridiculous due to its eccentric plot but the sincerity that Phoenix brings to the role allows the audience to become truly invested in the plot.

Inherent Vice (2014)

Phoenix’s second collaboration with Paul Thomas Anderson brings renowned author Thomas Pynchon to the big screen in what is the only adaptation to date. Based on the drug-infused novel, Inherent Vice, we follow Doc Sportello, an alcoholic, drug-loving cop in 1969 as he tries to bring down a drug lord. It’s a hallucinogenic mesh of colour, music and Joanna Newsom who stars as a narrator only Doc can see. The film itself is hugely underrated, possibly due to the fact that it is too bizarre for a lot of people. Being a big fan of Pynchon, I was so excited to see how it would work adapting one of his books into film and it works perfectly. Phoenix is perfect casting and carries off Doc’s happy-go-lucky attitude with ease. He heads up a star-studded cast fantastically and commands the screen whenever he is on it. He brings the perfect amount of slapstick while also keeping the character’s dignity intact. It’s truly a brilliant film that I think is wrongly overlooked.

You Were Never Really Here (2017)

Lynne Ramsay’s gritty New York City based nightmare follows Phoenix as hitman, Joe, who lives and breathes violence and killing all while living with his elderly mother in his childhood home. He specialises in rescuing trafficked girls. He’s a character who’s backstory is stained with violence and abuse and there isn’t much else that he is capable of doing. He is quiet and alone but happy in his loneliness. When tasked with retrieving a Senator’s daughter from traffickers, Joe embarks on his hardest mission yet. The film is bloody and holds no punches. It’s brutal from beginning to end with devastating results. The direction and writing is super tight and brought both Phoenix and Ramsay prizes at Cannes Film Festival in a rare double win.

With the release of Joker, it seems that Phoenix is going to break into the mainstream and he’s the frontrunner come award season. It seems that these awards are long overdue. If it were up to me, he’d have a couple of oscars in his cabinet already but sadly that hasn’t been the case. I’d hope that those who are introduced to phoenix’s talents as the Joker watch him in other films and see his talents beyond that superhero universe.

I’ll be posting a review for Joker as soon as its released and I’m looking forward to seeing whether it would break into my top 5.

What do you think of my list? Do you agree or disagree? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Once Upon a Time… in Hollywood (2019)

Arguably the most hyped film of the year sees acclaimed director Quentin Tarantino return to his native Hollywood for his ninth (and penultimate) outing. Set in 1969 where hippies reigned and Hollywood stars are quickly on the wain, this film was always going to be the most personal for Tarantino as this film provides the backdrop of his own childhood. It’s a film that provides plenty of Tarantino techniques as well as showing his growth as a filmmaker and storyteller.

It seems only natural that a film set in Hollywood should discuss the cast first. A star studded ensemble headed by Oscar winner, Leonardo DiCaprio in his second collaboration with Tarantino as leading man Rick Dalton who is in desperate need for a decent role to revitalise his waning career. Dalton seems to wallow in self-pity as he is offered role after role on television but isn’t satisfied with the characters. Dalton is the polar opposite of DiCaprio, who is at a point in his life where he is playing some of the most interesting and challenging characters in film today. Ironically, the best character Dalton plays is himself, with a complex self-hatred which contrasts with his desire to see his face everywhere he goes (his house is cluttered with movie posters and his car parking space has a giant painting of his face). Dalton is surrounded by the expectations of the man he once was that he cannot live up to the standards of the actor he could be now. One of the best scenes in the film sees Rick have a drunken breakdown in his trailer when he lightly messes up a scene. Promising never to drink again as he swigs from his whiskey flask, it’s abundantly clear that Dalton’s worst enemy is himself. Partner this with Brad Pitt’s cool and collected Cliff Booth, Dalton’s long-term stunt double who lives in a crammed trailer with his dog behind a drive-through cinema, Cliff dreams of stability after allegedly killing his wife but his rough nature gets in the way. Featuring a controversial scene in which he beats the shit out of Bruce Lee, Booth appears introverted and vulnerable but has a violent streak in a bid to survive.

Screen-Shot-2019-05-10-at-10.19.22-9d771b4.png

One of the major talking points in the run up to the film was the handling of Hollywood actress, Sharon Tate, who was one of the real life victims of the Manson Murders. Portrayed by Margot Robbie, we see Sharon in the early stages of her career. From the get go, this was a perfect casting choice. Robbie has shown her strengths and growth as an actress from her breakout role in The Wolf of Wall Street to her Oscar-nominated turn in I, Tonya where she portrayed infamous ice-skater, Tonya Harding. Tate is a more relaxed departure and has a naivety as she navigates her career and enters public life alongside husband, Roman Polanksi who at this point had achieve international acclaim for Rosemary’s Baby. Renowned for her beauty and kind-nature, Tate was in the midst of releasing new film The Wrecking Crew in 1969. In a scene that is both heartwarming and breaking at the same time, we see Tate sneak into a cinema to watch her film among the general public. Her reactions as the audience laugh and cheer her character on allow us to see the woman behind the eventual tragedy, an opportunity for her to be known for something more than a murder victim. Of course it wouldn’t be a Tarantino film if we didn’t see someone’s feet which confused audiences alike. I think it was Tarantino’s way of paying tribute to her while also breaking the blur between reality and fiction. An odd tribute but a tribute all the same.

The big turning point in the film comes when Cliff visits Spahn Ranch, home of Charles Manson’s “family” after an encounter with a potentially underage member (Margaret Qualley). The tone mirrors that of a horror film as Cliff walks the long path to the head house to check on its owner, George Spahn (Bruce Dern). I think that this will go down as one of Tarantino’s best scenes as the direction is impeccable. By this point we’ve seen Cliff’s ability to fight so we know that he is capable of defending himself; however, Tarantino uses the hindsight and context of the situation to drive fear in the audience as crowds of young, waif-like hippies crowd around him in droves. It’s a scene that combines the suspense of The Hateful Eight, the Western qualities of Django Unchained and the hazy Californian setting of Pulp Fiction that brings something quintessentially Tarantino while also showing us something new.

spahn-ranch.png

Now for my favourite part of any film – the script! I wouldn’t be surprised to see Tarantino among the nominees for Best Original Screenplay come awards season. He may even walk away with his third gong at the Academy Awards. The dialogue seems sharper and more realistically placed than his previous offerings. Tarantino does a great job of recreating his childhood through detailed settings and timely cultural references. Whereas Pulp Fiction has plenty of iconic quotes and relies on the words on the page, Once Upon a Time… In Hollywood is quite the opposite and much like its subject, it closes in on the actors and is very physically demanding. The film is largely reserved in its violence for the most part, culminating in a massive showdown at the end which justifies the 18 certificate it received. The film is profoundly analytical and draws more similarities to Boogie Nights than Pulp Fiction in my eyes due to the exposure of the grit beneath the glamour of stardom. Tarantino also takes away his use of “chapters”, instead splitting the films into specific days in the run up to the day of the Manson murders. The direction is brilliant in that it showcases a global talent from the confines of his house for the most part. The importance of the home is reiterated throughout the film as Sharon and Roman have recently moved in to the house next door to Rick who mainly stays in (mostly in part to the drinking problem he has as well as his will to ostracise himself). This is ultimately a film about Tarantino’s home literally and figuratively through his childhood but also cinema as a safe place.

The scope of this film is so vast that it is simply impossible to discuss every aspect in one simple review but it’s definitely a film that requires more than one watch. I wouldn’t be surprised if Tarantino even walked away with his long awaited Best Director Oscar which would thoroughly be deserved. This is the film that he was born to make and only builds up even more hype for his alleged final film. I have a feeling that this will be the film to beat.

Have you seen Once Upon a Time… In Hollywood yet? What did you think?

Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Toy Story 4 (2019)

I won’t give away too much of the specific plot away in my review but the basic storyline is new owner Bonnie creates a toy out of trash, Forky, who becomes her favourite toy but he longs to be back with the trash. When the family take a road trip, Forky jumps out the window to become trash meaning Woody has to go collect him and bring him back to Bonnie. The film is then set in a quaint little town that has a travelling carnival visiting and Pixar makes use of this inclusion with aplomb. Pixar studio always said that they would only go ahead with Toy Story 4 if the story was necessary. When they announced that the film was in production (and despite the high quality of each Toy Story film), I couldn’t help doubting whether a fourth installment really was necessary since the third one rounded the franchise off nicely. I am glad to say that there was no need to be in doubt at all. I think that the UK marketing team for Pixar did a brilliant job of not actually giving away too much of the plot which made the film all the more enjoyable to watch and also surprising.

It goes without saying that Tom Hanks and Tim Allen do a fantastic job in their iconic roles as Woody and Buzz, respectively but there are also a great array of new characters that are brought into the fold. My favourite character is the aforementioned Forky. Everything about this little guy is hilarious from how he looks to his physicality to the way he talks and socialises with other toys. He is a fantastic little addition to the Toy Story family and honestly it’s been hilarious seeing how many toys Disney have made of him for extortinate prices despite the fact that his character was literally made from items from a bin. Other characters introduced in this film include Bunny and Ducky, voiced by comedy duo Jordan Peele and Keegan-Michael Key who are also great additions. They are adorable plush teddies who have been waiting three years to be won at the carnival fair. The last toy inclusion to mention is Duke Kaboom, a Canadian action figure voiced by Keanu Reeves. He is a hilarious and sensitive character who speaks passionately about his past owner, Rijon, who got rid of him. We also see the reintroduction of an old toy in this film. Bringing back Bo Peep who has been given a makeover into a strong heroine is a long cry away from her shy, lovestruck self in the first two Toy Story films and has been the cause of complaint to some but rest assured it is done fantastically and subtly to the point where it makes sense with her own storyline. It’s also great for Pixar to show the contextual progression where female characters don’t have to be passive love interests. Bo Peep does a lot of the rescuing in this film and it’s treated no differently to when male characters take action.

It’s easy to imagine that with the addition of so many characters that they don’t have their chance for character growth but the writers have done a great job with balancing this out. Forky and Bo Peep are given the most space for character growth since their stories are central to the plot whereas Ducky, Bunny and Duke are used as comic relief so only their backstories are given. Knowing the importance of the toys in the specific film means that the audience isn’t crammed with too many plotlines that they can’t keep up with. With their being so many new and different characters, it does mean that all of Bonnie’s toys (with the exception of Woody, Buzz and arguably Jessie) may as well have not been brought on the road trip. When Bonnie loses Forky, she doesn’t care that she has numerous other (non-trash made) toys in the RV. They’re just there in the background for the whole film. They didn’t even need to bring in a replacement for Mr. Potatohead as they recycled old lines said by Don Rickles in previous films. This isn’t a bad thing necessarily but it does mean that their importance has been faded out in this (supposedly) final installment. There were many scenes that I enjoyed in this film but if I had to pick one, I would say when Woody and Forky are having their heart to heart after Forky jumps out the RV. Woody tries to make Forky understand the importance of his role as a toy which means Forky has the realisation that he is “Bonnie’s trash”. It’s one of those heart-warming scenes injected with humour which have become synonymous with the Toy Story franchise. Also, any scene with Duke Kaboom in because he is absolutely hilarious and his backstory was heartbreaking to watch.

Another thing to talk about is how amazing the animation is, in particular Bo Peep. The shine and reflective effect of her porcelein is an incredible development from the first film. It makes her look eerie at times but more delicate as well (she is porcelein after all!). When you look back to how she appeared in the first film, the animation doesn’t compare. I’m not dissing the first film because it achieved so much at the time of its release in regards to animation, but celebrating the achievements made since then and seeing that transformation in the span of 24 years is incredible. Also the textures of the plushes and ventriloquist dummies that appear in this film are equally fantastic.

I think that Toy Story 4 was well worth the wait and seemed like the true ending for the franchise. I think it will go on to win the Best Animated Feature at the Oscars next year (to be honest, it’s rare that a Disney film doesn’t win this) and I think it will date well as a film. I think what makes it work so well is that even though it follows on from the trilogy and the franchise, there is a different feel to it altogether because they’re not Andy’s toys anymore. With a new owner comes new changes and this opened up a door for new storylines and motives.

Categories
Uncategorised

Pixar Features Ranking: Films 11-15

This period saw the complete acquisition of Pixar by Disney, giving complete control to the Disney board on what projects should go ahead at Disney. Whereas John Lasseter had stopped sequels and remakes previously, Disney did the opposite at Pixar and wanted to capitalise on the loved characters that Pixar had created. Although with Toy Story 2 they had found success, other franchises were not as lucky and the films were met with lukewarm reviews which was pretty unheard of at Pixar but has sadly become more of the norm now.

If you want to read the other Pixar reviews and ranking you can click the links below:

Films 1-5

Films 6-10

Now without further ado, let’s begin with the reviews and rankings for Pixar films 11-15:

11) Toy Story 3 (2010)

The third segment of Toy Story 3 was built with hype in the months leading up to its release and it certainly didn’t disappoint. Following the toys’ adventure in a daycare centre as Andy heads off to college, Woody, Buzz and co face off against the manipulative Lotso and his henchmen who oppress the “weaker” toys. It’s brilliant and sassy, bringing everything we love about the franchise into an even bigger film. My favourite inclusion is Ken and his dream-house with the scene in which he shows Barbie his vintage clothes collection is clearly so well researched with the materials and textures impeccable as always. The scene where Barbie threatens to rip his clothes has me on edge as we see her ripping each individual thread apart is just as horrific as the now-iconic incinerator scene. Although not quite as good as Toy Story 2 in my opinion (although this is no insult), Toy Story 3 won the franchise its first Best Animated Feature Oscar with ease. Bringing in new toys courtesy of the daycare centre as well as Bonnie’s (the daycare assistant’s daughter) collection which features a Totoro and personal favourite, Mr. Pricklepants, a dramatic hedgehog teddy who loves Shakespearean style acting. Passing the toys onto Bonnie at the end seemed like a fitting ending for the franchise so it is exciting to see how Toy Story 4 will fare and if it will live up to its hype.

12) Cars 2 (2011)

I didn’t go into this film with high hopes because I am not a fan of the franchise and I think that Cars has been the weakest offering in Pixar by a long-shot so I was definitely surprised when they announced a sequel. Pretty much more of the same but with added spies, Lightning McQueen finds himself a love interest in the form of Holley Shiftwell. It’s racing, it’s boring and to be honest Lightning McQueen isn’t an engaging enough character to be the protagonist. I am happy that there is more focus on Mater in this film but he spends most of his screen-time getting berated by McQueen who is so focused on his image and looking cool that it seems the messages he learned from the first film are completely forgotten because of his egotism. I hate to be biased about it but it just doesn’t interest me as a franchise and as much as I try to enjoy these films, I simply struggle to because of how ridiculous the whole concept is.

13) Brave (2012)

Now for a film I was really excited to see in the cinema on its release day. Featuring Pixar’s first princess, Merida, Brave looked to be full of spirit as the princess longs for freedom and to fight the tradition of marriage as is expected of her. In the course of her rebellion, she argues with her mum who is then turned into a bear. This film is an odd because aesthetically, it is stunning and captures Medieval Scotland beautifully but the screenplay is imbalanced and poorly paced. The beginning and ending to this film are brilliantly done but the middle portion just doesn’t seem to fit. It feels as though there was so much focus in establishing Merida’s character and how her character will end up rather than establishing her character and the mum’s character and then developing their relationship in the typical Pixar way, with detail and finesse. The middle portion seems poorly planned and forced, making the film drag and bringing an underwhelming feeling to the audience. The general consensus was the same among critics and audiences who responded with mixed reviews although the film did do well at the box office and subsequently won the Best Animated Feature Oscar although this was in (admittedly) an underwhelming year overall.

14) Monsters University (2013)

The first prequel offered by Pixar was a surprising choice. Monsters University, as implied, follows Mike and Sulley in university and shows how they met and how their friendship developed. It feels formulaic in development, the two dislike each other with Sulley the jock type and Mike as a nerd, the two find common ground before using their strengths to win the “Scare Games”. It’s not a terrible film by any means but it is very cliche and feels underwhelming for a Pixar film. Although it received positive reviews, it doesn’t hold a light against Monsters, Inc. because it’s clear that this is a film that Disney has ordered to be made rather than an organic creation. In Sulley and Mike’s fraternity, there are a collection of cliche characters. Although basic, my favourite is Art, the creative hyper artsy type who is bright purple and rolls around super fast and likes shiny things. I’m glad that they chose to create a film set in a different environment in the monster universe because this does make it far removed from the original and therefore the impact of Monsters, Inc. hasn’t be tainted.

15) Inside Out (2015)

After several underwhelming offerings, Pixar appeared to get back into their stride with this masterpiece. The question the creators asked: what if feelings had feelings? The result is a brilliant portrayal of the emotions living inside a teenage girl, Riley after her parents force the family to move to San Francisco from their cosy life in Michigan. As Riley struggles to fit in, her major emotions: Joy, Anger, Disgust, Panic and Sadness also struggle to adjust to the situation. This sees Sadness outcast by Joy and the others which causes an imbalance when Joy and Sadness are accidentally sucked from “headquarters” and into Riley’s mind. Although the plot may appear simple, a teenage girl struggles to fit in, the Emotions’ journey is actually a complex one as they learn that they need each other to thrive in the environment. Joy learns that Riley needs Sadness in order to feel those moments of joy and that this isn’t always a bad thing even if it doesn’t feel nice in the moment. Although the most dense of the Pixar films, it isn’t without its lighter moments which are provided by Anger, Disgust and Panic, who are struggling to run headquarters with Joy. I don’t think Inside Out could have been made 20 years ago as people find it hard to talk about real and complex feelings, especially in a children’s film but now there is a wider awareness on mental health and the importance of this in young children. It is a film that can engage that younger audience, even if they don’t understand everything and as they grow, they will learn to understand it. Also, the inclusion of childhood imaginary friend, Bing Bong shows the importance of the child imagination from a young age as he helps Joy and Sadness find their way back to headquarters. It’s a brilliant film that will have you roaring with laughter one moment and then sobbing the next, making it as emotionally complex and rewarding as the film itself.

This ranking was a little easier because there were a few under-performers in my opinion. I think that Pixar thrives when able to produce original content because Pixar have established themselves as the innovator rather than the follower so it’s a shame that Disney are forcing the same structure on the studio as itself by creating sequels and prequels.

Here is my ranking:

1) Up (2009)

2) WALL-E (2008)

3) Toy Story 2 (1999)

4) Inside Out (2015)

5) Ratatouille (2007)

6) Toy Story 3 (2010)

7) Monsters, Inc. (2001)

8) Finding Nemo (2003)

9) The Incredibles (2004)

10) Toy Story (1995)

11) A Bug’s Life (1998)

12) Brave (2012)

13) Monsters University (2013)

14) Cars (2006)

15) Cars 2 (2011)

The next post will look at the last bunch of offerings that includes even more sequels but also gives a couple of originals so let’s hope this batch fares a little better than this bunch.

What do you think of the ranking now? Is it a surprise? Let me know in the comments below!