Categories
Uncategorised

London Film Festival 2021: The Power of the Dog

It’s no secret that the COVID-19 pandemic saw the delay of many films which has resulted in a huge amount of quality films being released this year. One such film to suffer from pandemic delays is Jane Campion’s The Power of the Dog which is her first feature film in 12 years since 2009’s Bright Star. Based on the novel of the same name by Thomas Savage, The Power of the Dog follows the lives of two brothers, Phil Burbank (Benedict Cumberbatch) and George Burbank (Jesse Plemons) who own a family ranch and how their lives change when George falls in love with – and quickly marries – Rose (Kirsten Dunst), a widow whose former husband died of suicide. In true Campion style, the film provides deep characterisation, stunning scenery, and a script that is so beautifully written and paced that you feel completely immersed in the film and its time period.

Written and directed by Jane Campion, The Power of the Dog has proven to be a huge hit at festivals and it’s easy to see why. The film feels authentically Western in its slow pacing with her writing and directing giving the film plenty of chance to breathe. The way Campion utilises natural light in her film brings a rawness that allows the landscape to show off its natural beauty without using any filters or techniques. Equally, Campion’s ability to make the audience feel claustrophobic in the open space is so clever such as the scene when Phil and Peter are on their travels through the hills. What is so wonderful about Campion’s filmmaking is that she has such an intricate knowledge of space and how to make use of the space. In one scene, we see George and Rose driving back to the ranch after dropping Peter off at school and they are surrounded by rolling hills which seems to go on for miles; however, what was once an open space is gradually zoomed into George and Rose as they try to dance and it suddenly feels as though the space has become much smaller. Unsurprisingly, the film has brought Campion much acclaim for her directing and she even won the Silver Bear at this year’s Venice Film Festival.

Leading the film is Benedict Cumberbatch as Phil Burbank in what is arguably his best performance to date. To say that Phil is a deeply complex character is an understatement. He is a character plagued by his past as he constantly refers to his late mentor – and lover – Bronco Henry, who has since passed away. The result of which is a character that internalises who he is and replaces it with toxic masculinity, feigning power and confidence through brutality and strength. Phil’s leadership and charisma is hard to miss as he makes his presence known no matter where he is. Cumberbatch is captivating in a role that may seem mismatched at first but his dedication and relentlessness allows us to him in an entirely new light. He has become a firm favourite for the Best Actor awards this coming awards season and it is easy to see why. Even if he doesn’t win, he will definitely earn nominations in what is a performance of a lifetime.

Playing Phil’s brother, George, is Jesse Plemons and the two characters couldn’t be more different. Where Phil is overly observant to a fault, George is oblivious although his heart is in the right place. Unable to see his wife suffering or catering to her needs, George tries to force her into a societal position that she doesn’t feel comfortable with. This isn’t out of malice or bullying but because he does what he believes is expected of him. Plemons is always great no matter what role he does and it’s a treat to see him in a bigger role. The scene where George confronts Phil about the latter’s treatment of Rose is ridiculously intense and this is because Plemons and Cumberbatch manage to bring an authenticity to their roles that feels genuine and brotherly. Kirsten Dunst plays Rose, a woman who recently lost her husband to suicide and is struggling to run the family restaurant. She marries George shortly after meeting him but soon finds that her brother-in-law, Phil, does not approve of their marriage, believing her to be a gold digger. Dunst is one of a few women in the film but her presence is duly noted and she commands each scene she is in, especially as her character delves into alcoholism. The lack of female roles is completely on purpose as the film is showing what happens when an environment is dominated by men and, specifically, toxic masculinity. Rose’s background is completely different to Phil’s entirely and it is these differences that cause friction between them. The scene in which Rose practices on the piano and eventually finds herself in competition with Phil’s banjo playing is somehow terrifying and comedic at the same time. Dunst’s performance in this scene is brilliant as we feel the fear in the character and her emotional struggle as she cannot finish her piece.

Another performance in this film that has been receiving a lot of attention is Kodi Smit-McPhee’s turn as Rose’s son, Peter. The first time we see Peter, he is delicately cutting pieces of paper which are then shaped to make paper flowers which he then takes to his father’s grave. From his sensitive nature to his crisp and neat appearance, it is clear that there is something that sets Peter apart from the other men in the area. This is pointed out during his first encounter with Phil and the rest of the ranchers as Phil makes fun of Peter’s flowers and the way he dresses and carries himself. Assuming that he is homosexual, Phil and the other men hurl homophobic insults at Peter wherever he goes and bully him relentlessly; however, Peter appears indifferent to their insults and carries on with his research to become a medical doctor. Smit-McPhee’s performance is the perfect opposition to Phil. Where Cumberbatch’s performance is loud and commanding, Smit-McPhee’s is much quiet and subtle while still grabbing the audience’s attention. The climactic scene between Phil and Peter in the barn is incredibly intense and has the audience at the edge of their seat and this is due to Cumberbatch and Smit-McPhee’s flawless chemistry.

One of the many highlights in this film is the beautiful score which is composed by Johnny Greenwood. What makes Greenwood one of the best composers working today is the huge range of films that he has worked on. Whether it is a period drama such as The Master or a thriller such as You Were Never Really Here, Greenwood always knocks it out off the park. He has delved into the Western genre before with his game-changing score for There Will Be Blood and yet somehow, he manages to create a completely new and different sound for the music in this film. Featuring hints of Western and thriller, Greenwood integrates his signature sounds with atmospheric tones that work seamlessly with the film. The music never overwhelms the film itself and yet manages to stand out and elevate the mood of the scene. Hopefully we will see Greenwood receive another Academy Award nomination for his work and maybe even a win.

The Power of the Dog was a film worth waiting for and more. Hopefully, it will see a lot of recognition come awards season thanks to the breath-taking direction, stellar script and impeccable performances, especially by Cumberbatch. Campion has come back with a bang and here’s hoping she doesn’t wait as long before making her next feature.

The Power of the Dog is showing at this year’s London Film Festival!

Categories
Uncategorised

Hillbilly Elegy (2020)

Hillbilly Elegy is based on the memoir of the same name by J. D. Vance (Gabriel Basso) and follows his story as a Yale law student who faces issues when he is called back to his childhood home in Ohio after his mother, Bev (Amy Adams) overdoses on heroin. Directed by Oscar-winning filmmaker, Ron Howard with the screenplay written by Vanessa Taylor (who has received an Oscar nomination for co-writing The Shape of Water). The film flits between the present day J.D. who is having to travel to Ohio to help get Bev back on track and flashbacks showing J.D. as a child growing up in a broken home as Bev’s lack of stability leads to him being put in the care of his grandmother, Mamaw (Glenn Close). Hillbilly Elegy has been the subject of much controversy from the release of the book and even more so with the release of the film.

Ron Howard is a director who has a clear passion and love for filmmaking. His strongest deliveries are when he focuses on biopics with Apollo 13 (1995), A Beautiful Mind (2001) and Frost/Nixon (2008) proving to be his most successful. What makes these films so strong is the connection Howard brings with the source material. On paper, Hillbilly Elegy should have proved to be a success for Howard and bring him his most critically successful film since Frost/Nixon. The memoir contains a lot of political subtext as it delves into his own Republican tendencies and attacks on Democrats, particularly under the Obama administration. This is where much of the controversy lies and with Howard being hugely Democratic himself, he decided to take any political context out of the film altogether. I think this is a huge mistake and a reason why the film doesn’t reach its full potential. Of course Vance and Howard clearly have different political values which is absolutely fine, but taking away Vance’s own political point of view in a story that is hugely ruled by its politics is taking away a big part of his own identity and characterisation. Howard needn’t direct the film in a light that “favours” the political party he opposes but I think the context should have been included even in the background.

Now to discuss the acting performances. Amy Adams has been touted as the lead in this film and I have to say that in my opinion, that is purely a tactic to win more awards. Do not be fooled, Amy Adams is in a supporting role in this film and it should be categorised as such. This isn’t anything against Adams or her performance but it is a very misleading top billing. The true lead performances in this film come from Owen Asztalos and Gabriel Basso as young and adult J.D, respectively. Both do a really decent job capturing J.D’s struggle to fit in and his determination to do well in school and work towards a career in law. Asztalos, in particular, does a great job with the conflict scenes in which he sees his family life breaking apart without fully understanding what is going on.

In support, we have Amy Adams as Bev and Glenn Close as Mamaw. Clearly the stars of the show, both give it their all and do their best with the script. However, I do think Adams was miscast (a statement I never thought I would ever say). Adams is clearly trying so hard to convey Bev’s drug addiction and inability to lead a sober and stable life but the writing doesn’t do much for the character. We don’t feel any sympathy for Bev as she succumbs to her addiction and her behaviour seems to come across as erratic without reason or explanation. In the end, she is dropped off at a motel by J.D who has to leave to attend an interview. There doesn’t seem to be any closure to her issues in a way that feels substantial enough. Close, on the other hand, pulls off a more convincing performance that is subtle and captivates when she is onscreen. She isn’t onscreen a lot but I do think out of the two, she does give the better performance. Gaining a lot of favour for the Best Supporting Actress Oscar, my personal support for now is actually going toward Amanda Seyfried in Mank. Close is going to get her Oscar but I really hope it is for an even better performance.

Overall, Hillbilly Elegy is a film that does fall into the Oscar bait category. With Adams and Close being the living actresses with the most Academy Award nominations without winning one, the film is clearly driving the agenda to add that Oscar to their collections. However, I am a firm believer in giving awards to the performances that deserve it and both women have carried off performances that should have won in my opinion (Amy Adams for Best Supporting Actress in The Master and Glenn Close for Best Leading Actress in Fatal Attraction). I think giving either one an Oscar for their performances in Hillbilly Elegy would be a huge disservice to the phenomenal careers the two of them have had. They do the best with the material and direction they have been given but neither performance is in the top 5 (even top 10) for either actress. When summarising Adams or Close’s careers, it’s highly doubtful that Hillbilly Elegy is going to be discussed among their greatest films.

What did you think of Hillbilly Elegy? Let me know in the comments below!

Hillbilly Elegy is available to view on Netflix.

Categories
Uncategorised

Top 10 Films of the 2010s

The past decade has brought a whirlwind of trends and big blockbuster magic as well as some indie gems. From the domination of franchises like Marvel’s Avengers and the return of the Star Wars franchise, cinema has become bigger than before. I thought it would be nice to look at my personal highlights from the last ten years and explore which films have stayed with me.

This wasn’t easy by any means as I knew the films had to be ones that truly impacted me on viewing and ones that felt rewarding on multiple watches. After much deliberation and thinking (trust me, many brilliant films were cut), I have managed to accumulate 10 films that I think sum up my film tastes for the past decade.

Here are my top 10 in chronological order:

Frances Ha (2012)

Beasts of the Southern Wild (2012)

The Master (2012)

The Tale of the Princess Kaguya (2013)

Mustang (2015)

Carol (2015)

Moonlight (2016)

The Shape of Water (2017)

mother! (2017)

Midsommar (2019)

What do you think of my choices? Let me know your favourites in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Beasts of the Southern Wild (2012)

Benh Zeitlin’s Deep South exploration of classism and racism within a microscopic community called The Bathtub based in the Louisiana Bayou shows the heartbreaking journey a little girl, Hushpuppy (Quvenzhané Wallis) makes to be reunited with her mum after her father falls ill who she hasn’t seen in years. The film is intricate in all of its elements and has become one of the most captivating films of the past decade for its brilliant cinematography, emotionally charged writing and a fantastic performance by Wallis. In fact, Wallis became the youngest nominee at age 9 for the Best Leading Actress Oscar at the 2013 ceremony for her performance. This may have been the big draw for the film as audiences were keen to see what the fuss was about but it is a film that has a big heart and delves into the trials and tribulations of family. It walked away empty-handed from the Oscars that year but so did other worthy films (aka. The Master) so it’s not the end of the world. I don’t think it has received the mass audience it deserves but it is a very small film and is loved by critics and film fans alike so it may grow into a modern classic soon enough.

Zeitlin’s direction is stunning and absolutely incredible for a first feature. His fixation on the community itself and reluctance to show the outside world was a great choice as the consequences and invasion of the outside world feels more impactful than if we saw The Bathtub in a larger context. We get to know similar faces and their way of life in the first half of the act and importantly, their strategies to escape from those who want to split them up. Hushpuppy isn’t raised in a conventional manner. Her education and lifestyle sees her living in her own house, cooking and raising animals at the age of 5. She is self-reliant and mature in many ways but what Zeitlin wants us to remember is that she is still a child. She sets fire to her house when angry at her father because she doesn’t think of the consequences. She screams and throws tantrums but she is also fearless and has a simplistic look on the world that makes it easy to identify the good and the bad. To Hushpuppy, there is no middle ground. Hushpuppy’s development in the script, written by Lucy Alibar and Zeitlin, is depicted beautifully as she begins to understand and comprehend the reality of the situation when she is separated from her dad and the truth about her mum.

Wallis’ performance is among the best of the decade for me. Only five years old when filming this, she truly encapsulates everything about Hushpuppy and pulls it off with ease. Unafraid to be big and proud but also willing to show vulnerability, the emotional spectrum that Hushpuppy goes through means that the role itself is deeply complex, especially for a child. This is because Hushpuppy isn’t a normal child. Wallis seems to understand this and commands attention when onscreen, which she is for the majority of the film. Thematically, Hushpuppy encounters loss, death and grief which are hugely dense topics for a child so young to even comprehend but Wallis is so engaged in her performance that she isn’t afraid of tackling this maturity head on.

The score composed by Dan Romer and director Zeitlin has become somewhat of a modern classic unbeknown to the mass audiences. The main theme has been used in various adverts and trailers alike and it feels like a piece that truly resonates the hope and adventure in the film. The soundtrack can only be described as strong and deep in heritage with Deep South banjos mixed with Cajun vibes creating a sound that feels exclusive to the community. The tracks are all fairly short as the film is made up of lots of smaller scenes rather than fewer elongated ones and this helps with the shift in tone and character. The use of brass in the score is phenomenal and makes the film feel grounded and rooted with nature. We feel Hushpuppy’s perseverance and strength.

What makes this one of my favourite films of the decade is the humility that it brings. Beasts of the Southern Wild is a film that has power in its characters and detail in writing that serves to develop characters, particularly Hushpuppy. It is such a striking film that isn’t afraid to push the realms of realism while simultaneously remaining grounded in very real topics of class and race politics. Because we view the film from Hushpuppy’s point of view predominantly, we too are seeing these issues in a very different manner. As her dad arrives home with a hospital wristband, it is only a minor detail on his outfit as Hushpuppy questions his “dress” (his hospital gown). It’s a film that discusses recurring issues but in a unique way and for that, I think it deserves to be remembered.

What do you think of Beasts of the Southern Wild? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Paul Thomas Anderson: Film Ranking

Paul Thomas Anderson is known for his experimental and fearless quest into exploring characters in ways that are unflinching and at times, uncomfortable.

With the exception of last place (I really struggle with the age-gap in the relationship), I’ve watched these films multiple times and some of them are among my favourite films of all time.

Here’s my ranking for the filmography of Paul Thomas Anderson:

  1. The Master (2012)
  2. There Will Be Blood (2007)
  3. One Battle After Another (2025)
  4. Boogie Nights (1997)
  5. Phantom Thread (2017)
  6. Magnolia (1999)
  7. Inherent Vice (2014)
  8. Punch-Drunk Love (2002)
  9. Hard Eight (1996)
  10. Licorice Pizza (2021)

Which PTA film is your favourite film? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Joker (2019)

I don’t know if there has been such a hype around a film with added polarisation to boot. Todd Phillips’ origin take on iconic villain in Joker shows how Arthur Fleck, a failed stand-up crippled with mental illness who rebels against a system that seems rigged and only rewards those born into riches and fortune. Arthur struggles to navigate his way in Gotham City which has gradually become more violent as the rich continue to cut public funding. I previously did a Top 5 Joaquin Phoenix performances post which you can read here in anticipation for this film. As I predicted, Joker would easily slip into the best of the best from an actor who can’t do any wrong. Joker also won the Golden Lion at Venice Film Festival which is unheard of for a franchise superhero film because of its groundbreaking venture and reluctance to fit in with a particular aesthetic that audiences and critics are used to.

Todd Phillips shows his talent for direction with this film. Taking inspiration from some of the best directors in history, mainly Martin Scorsese, Phillips achieves in making an epic based not on a superhero franchise but on a character. This film is rich in character development that it would weirdly fit in with the films of Paul Thomas Anderson. It’s refreshing to see someone venture into a different genre of film despite his ridiculous motive. An obvious element to point out would be that the film is told from Arthur’s perspective in contrast to the numerous Batman films that only see the Joker from Bruce Wayne’s point of view. Phillips allows us to not necessarily sympathise Joker’s actions but to understand his view of a city that ignored him for years and stomped on him daily. Phillips throws us into a specific period of his life rather than showing us his life thus far. What we learn about Arthur’s background is varied and unreliable so it becomes hard to grasp Arthur as a person. What we do gain is that he has lead a life that has pulled him in all sorts of uncertainties and directions but when he is dressed as a clown, he feels comfortable behind the guise.

As expected, Joaquin Phoenix is nothing less than extraordinary and this role will almost certainly bring him an abundance of award wins I think. He is arguably the best working actor today. This may be his time to win a long overdue Oscar (he should have won for The Master really) but that’s not to say that it wouldn’t be deserved if he won for this. Arthur Fleck is a deeply complex character. His mental illness leaves him extremely vulnerable as seen in the opening scene when a group of teenagers take his sign and subsequently beat him up, he’s physically malnourished with Phoenix losing 50 pounds for the role. There are so many layers and sides to this character that he becomes increasingly unreliable and the uncertainty in his actions makes for a terrifying experience. There’s no predicting his motives or what he will do next. If I had to draw comparisons from another Joker, it would have to be Jack Nicholson’s particularly in the chat show scenes but that’s only a glimmer as Phoenix has managed to pave a way for his own Joker. Phoenix is an absolute powerhouse of acting and even those who dislike the film have respect for his portrayal. It’s a performance that shows the physical and mental consequence to actions made by those seen as “higher” and “superior” than himself.

JOKER-Final-Trailer-1-54-screenshot.png

As far as other characters go, we have a supporting role led by Robert De Niro who is making a welcome return from a few years of very questionable choices in film as Murray Franklin, Gotham’s most popular talk show host. Arthur idealises this man but what he doesn’t realise is that Murray is a product of the society that threatens to marginalise him further. He broadcasts a portion of Arthur’s failed stand-up routine for the whole of Gotham to see and isolate him further. Arthur appears oblivious to Murray’s behaviour initially and eagerly accepts and invitation to be on his show in which he is ridiculed further but Arthur isn’t as vulnerable as it seems and his appearance on the show makes for one of the most intense scenes in film this year. I hope De Niro keeps this up and with The Irishman coming out later this year, I am hoping this marks a return to the actor that we loved before Dirty Grandpa.

My favourite scene would have to be the Bathroom Dance scene in which Joker finds his way to a grimy public bathroom and dances with himself. The combination of Phoenix’s whimsical nature and the dark, vibrant score that provides an undertone for what had occurred in the previous scene. Hildur Guðnadóttir’s award-winning score for Joker was one of my major highlights aside from Phoenix. It feels that the score and the character are connected as the score weaves its way through Arthur’s movement. In this scene, the two are combined as one and it is as if this is the music in his mind. If any scene could be used to sum up the film, it’s this one. The Joker is known for his violent outbursts but this scene sees him literally celebrating a triple murder. It’s a different side that we see for a character who had thus far been victimised and pushed down.

I was excited for Joker since I am a huge Joaquin Phoenix fan but, to be honest, the hype surrounding the film made me less and less excited and I was unsure whether I would enjoy. However, I was not let down and thoroughly enjoyed the film from beginning to end. As someone who has experience with mental illness, it was refreshing to see mental illness portrayed in a way that seemed unfiltered and honest. Of course, the character of Arthur Fleck isn’t one to aspire to but the film shows a picture of how those less fortunate are left to fend for themselves when thrown into difficult situations. Joker is a film that lends itself well to the DC franchise but also as a standalone in its own right. It’s depiction of a broken character who becomes even more fragmented is unafraid and undoubtedly a reflection of society today. The film feels progressive and risky while also remaining loyal to a character that has been well-loved for decades.

Categories
Uncategorised

Top 5 Joaquin Phoenix Performances

Undoubtedly the man of the moment in the film that has the festival circuit buzzing, Joaquin Phoenix is the frontrunner for awards for his titular performance in Todd Phillips’ origin story Joker. During a film climate that seems dominated by superhero films, Joker seems like it is doing something entirely different by twisting the tone and idea of the superhero movie. It feels that after years of playing the underdog in Indie features and his reluctance to entertain the spotlight, the mainstream media has finally caught up. It feels only right that I compile a list of my top 5 performances although it’s very tricky to do so.

Here’s my top 5 in chronological order:

Gladiator (2000)

I never thought Gladiator would be in a top anything list. Truth be told, I find the film overwhelming overall but the one element of it I absolutely love is Joaquin Phoenix’s brilliant performance as the evil Commodus, the power hungry son of Marcus Aurelius who gives power to Maximus (Russell Crowe) until a new empire is formed. His lust for power knows no bounds as he murders his own father and has Maximus arrested. It’s Phoenix’s performance that brings the real depth to this film. He could have easily played this role as a cartoonish villain but instead brings a snakelike presence to the character. His strength comes from the power that others give him rather than strength that he has by himself which comes to fruition in the final fight scene with Maximus.

The Master (2012)

Undoubtedly my favourite Joaquin Phoenix performance, The Master follows ex-marine Freddie Quell (Joaquin Phoenix) as he becomes involved with a cult called The Cause, led by Lancaster Dodd (Philip Seymour Hoffman) and his wife, Peggy (Amy Adams). I won’t dwell too much on this film, mainly because I have written an extensive review for this film (which you can read here). Phoenix brings his A game to his performance and it truly is a career best. The scene where he initially undergoes “Processing” with Lancaster in which his darkest secrets and even darker past are revealed. It’s a brilliantly shot scene that brings together to titans of acting and should have won both Phoenix and Hoffman Academy Awards.

Her (2013)

Spike Jonze’s romantic Her shows a tender side to Phoenix in the role of Theodore Twombly, a depressed soon-to-be divorcé whose job is writing intimate letters for people who are too afraid to do so. He is so emotionally intense and yet detached at the same time as he begins a sexual relationship with his OS (voiced by Scarlett Johansson). Featuring a stellar cast that is rounded off by Amy Adams and Rooney Mara, this was one of the best films of 2013 and brought Spike Jonze a much-deserved Oscar for his screenplay. It’s a saddening portrayal of love and heartbreak in the 21st century. This is a film that easily could have fallen into ridiculous due to its eccentric plot but the sincerity that Phoenix brings to the role allows the audience to become truly invested in the plot.

Inherent Vice (2014)

Phoenix’s second collaboration with Paul Thomas Anderson brings renowned author Thomas Pynchon to the big screen in what is the only adaptation to date. Based on the drug-infused novel, Inherent Vice, we follow Doc Sportello, an alcoholic, drug-loving cop in 1969 as he tries to bring down a drug lord. It’s a hallucinogenic mesh of colour, music and Joanna Newsom who stars as a narrator only Doc can see. The film itself is hugely underrated, possibly due to the fact that it is too bizarre for a lot of people. Being a big fan of Pynchon, I was so excited to see how it would work adapting one of his books into film and it works perfectly. Phoenix is perfect casting and carries off Doc’s happy-go-lucky attitude with ease. He heads up a star-studded cast fantastically and commands the screen whenever he is on it. He brings the perfect amount of slapstick while also keeping the character’s dignity intact. It’s truly a brilliant film that I think is wrongly overlooked.

You Were Never Really Here (2017)

Lynne Ramsay’s gritty New York City based nightmare follows Phoenix as hitman, Joe, who lives and breathes violence and killing all while living with his elderly mother in his childhood home. He specialises in rescuing trafficked girls. He’s a character who’s backstory is stained with violence and abuse and there isn’t much else that he is capable of doing. He is quiet and alone but happy in his loneliness. When tasked with retrieving a Senator’s daughter from traffickers, Joe embarks on his hardest mission yet. The film is bloody and holds no punches. It’s brutal from beginning to end with devastating results. The direction and writing is super tight and brought both Phoenix and Ramsay prizes at Cannes Film Festival in a rare double win.

With the release of Joker, it seems that Phoenix is going to break into the mainstream and he’s the frontrunner come award season. It seems that these awards are long overdue. If it were up to me, he’d have a couple of oscars in his cabinet already but sadly that hasn’t been the case. I’d hope that those who are introduced to phoenix’s talents as the Joker watch him in other films and see his talents beyond that superhero universe.

I’ll be posting a review for Joker as soon as its released and I’m looking forward to seeing whether it would break into my top 5.

What do you think of my list? Do you agree or disagree? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

The Sworn Enemy in ‘The Master’

“If you figure a way to live without serving a master, any master, then let the rest of us know, will you? For you’d be the first person in the history of the world.”

  • Lancaster Dodd, The Master (dir. by Paul Thomas Anderson, 2012)

philip-seymour-hoffman-the-master

By the time this statement is spoken, we have seen the relationship between ex-Naval officer, Freddie Quell (Joaquin Phoenix) and Master of the Cause, Lancaster Dodd (Philip Seymour Hoffman) flourish and burn. The scene in which this exchange happens is in London. Freddie has travelled the Atlantic to face off The Master once more. On entering The Cause’s headquarters, he is judged by those who know him and ignored by those who do. There is no physical conflict, no shouting, only two men who are saddened by the demise of their friendship and the realisation that they can never see each other again. The Master is the head of The Cause, a cult that believes they are spirits living in a vessel and once life ends in one vessel, they simply move on to the next. Dodd’s mission is essentially one that lasts for eternity. Freddie staggers in a drunken state onto Dodd’s boat after accidentally poisoning a man with moonshine he had made. Freddie is an ex-marine, unemployed, sex-addicted alcoholic, making him the perfect challenge for his new methods to engage with past vessels. Completely unhinged and uninfluenced by society, Freddie refuses to be reined in by the restrictions put to him by Dodd and his wife, Peggy (Amy Adams) resulting in the collapse of the American branch of the Cause and forcing Dodd to relocate to England.

The Master is regarded one of the best films of the 21st century so far and is one of my favourite films ever made (I have written a review which you can read here). Set in 1950, the film follows ex-marine, Freddie Quell, as he becomes associated with the Cause, a cult that believes that the spirit transcends the body (or vessel as is referred to) and simply changes after death. Although the film is set in a particular place at a particular time, its subject matter actually makes the film seem timeless. The characters wear clothes as expected of the time and the treatment of women and sex is reflective of the time but the sentiment transcends its period, much like the spirit, and can be argued as relevant in the 21st century. Of course, this film was made in the 21st century so it has the advantage of hindsight but I think Paul Thomas Anderson’s script captures the idea of the slave and master perfectly. The Cause is portrayed as a small religion, a friendly group of people who channel their past selves in order to eventually see where man began. Freddie is confused by everything and only wants to drink and have sex but these activities are rejected and he becomes uncomfortable and agitated. It is as though he is young again as we see flashbacks of him with his first love, Doris, before he leaves for war. There is hope in the young Freddie of returning home and marrying Doris but this dream is shattered on his arrival as he finds out she is married with two children. The Cause gives Freddie a purpose to live by hoping to engage with his inner self and control it, thus allowing him to become fully subservient to The Master.

master_finalshot

The ending brings the film full circle as Freddie has sex with a woman he meets in a pub and thinks about his time on the beach after the war, waiting to go home. The final shot is him sleeping beside a female form made of sand. It is peaceful and serene as Freddie appears comfortable. He has become “the first person in the history of the world” to live without serving a Master. He is the free spirit that Dodd achieves to ultimately control, the “sworn enemy” as he puts it.

Categories
Uncategorised

The Master (2012)

Paul Thomas Anderson is known for his track record of spectacular films, never once making a bad film. His filmography includes breakthrough classics like 1997’s Boogie Nights and the iconic 2007 effort There Will Be Blood just to name a few. However, the one film that strikes a cord with me on a personal note is his 2012 star studded cult study The Master in which Joaquin Phoenix plays Freddie Quell, an alcholic, sex addicted ex-marine who struggles to adjust to normal life after World War II. After an unfortunate incident in which he arguably poisons and kills someone with a toxic alcoholic drink, he escapes and sneaks onto a boat that is currently home to members of The Cause, a cult ran by the titular character, also known as Lancaster Dodd (played superbly by Philip Seymour Hoffman). The Master was severely overlooked on release but has gained a reputation in recent years as one of the best films of the 21st century so far and deservedly so. With striking direction and a flawless screenplay, it’s a film that shows the plight to belong and find that place of belonging and where you fit in the world.

Directed and written by Paul Thomas Anderson, The Master is my favourite of his films and is his own personal favourite as well. With the direction having a keen focus on Freddie and his journey to self acceptance while refusing to fully conform to what The Cause expects from him, this is a film that is deep in manipulation and questionable motives. Anderson’s screenplay does a great job of providing the mystique behind The Master and what his motivations are when it comes to Freddie and bringing Freddie in to The Cause. It is halfway through when we find out his real name as the allure surrounding him begins to crumble and Freddie starts to see the reality of The Cause and how society actually views them.

Leading the cast is Joaquin Phoenix as Freddie Quell in what is a career best performance. A sex-addicted alcoholic veteran, Freddie is a deeply troubled character who deals with physical and mental illness whilst also being unable to adjust to regular society following the end of the Second World War. He is erratic and unpredictable, making him the perfect guinea pig for The Master’s new techniques. What Phoenix always does so well is really delve into his characters to a point where he can contort his physicality to become that character and we forget that we are watching an actor. Marking the first of two collaborations between Phoenix and Anderson (the second was 2014’s Inherent Vice), The Master was a perfect pairing for this highly intensive study into a character who seemingly has no place to belong.

In support we have Philip Seymour Hoffman as the titular character and Amy Adams as his wife, Peggy. Both deliver exceptional performances and were my top picks for their respective Acadeny Award categories. Hoffman’s performance has helped in making one of the best original characters put to screen. A quiet performance that is heavily layered, we don’t never fully understand why The Master acts the way he does or what his motivations are as his techniques are always changing. Touring the country and meeting followers, his reputation and inability to remain calm towards critics begins to surface and the mask begins to slip. Where Freddie doesn’t know where he belongs, The Master has created his own place of belonging and is determined to thrust his point of view and his agenda onto those who can be influenced, especially in high society.

One of the highlights in terms of the crew is the soundtrack which was composed by Anderson’s frequent collaborator, Jonny Greenwood. Having seen a lot of success for his score for There Will Be Blood, Greenwood takes inspiration from the 1940s and 50s period and incorporates instruments that are reminiscent of the marines such as woodwind which helps to elevate that atmosphere. We can see the film purely through the music because it helps to paint that picture.

Overall, what makes The Master such a brilliant film is the amount of detail that is in the direction and screenplay. The interpretative nature means that you can watch it and come to a conclusion then watch it again and come to an entirely different conclusion. It’s not an easy film to watch but the best films never are. Beautiful and poignant with a timeless quality, The Master is sure to go down as a classic in years to come.

What do you think of The Master? Let me know in the comments below!