Tag: character

Categories
Uncategorised

Top 5 It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia Episodes

There are a lot of comedy sitcoms around nowadays that serve to shock and push boundaries. One such comedy series is It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia which has been shaking things up since 2005. Following the owners of Paddy’s Pub, the Gang consists of brother and sister Dennis and Dee Reynolds (Glenn Howerton and Kaitlin Olsen), their father Frank (Danny DeVito), “bouncer” Mac (Rob McElhenney) and cleaner, Charlie (Charlie Day). The episodes follow their day-to-day lives, showcasing their offensive and ridiculous behaviour. A simple setup but what makes this show so great and iconic is the writing which is a shared collaboration between its stars, particularly Howerton, McElhenney and Day.

Now preparing for their 15th season and showing no signs of showing down, Always Sunny has become one of the household names in American comedy for its fearlessness in tackling taboo subjects whilst managing to maintain a charm. The cast are all perfect in their roles and the strength of the show has only improved throughout the years. What is so brilliant is how terrible the characters are but you still root for them anyway. The writing is done perfectly and flawlessly, giving a variety of memorable moments that is going to make it difficult to narrow down to five episodes. In true Smaller Pictures fashion, however, I have decided to pick my top 5 episodes from the 154 episodes that have aired so far.

Here are my top 5 episodes:

5) “The Gang Desperately Tries to Win an Award”, Season 9

Kicking off my countdown is this gem from the shows 9th season. One of the things Always Sunny does best is bringing in the outside world and incorporating that into the narrative. To go even further, “The Gang Desperately Tries to Win an Award” goes meta as it reflects the fact that Always Sunny has never been nominated for an Emmy. This fact in itself is outrageous but the result of the episode gives us one of the best songs of the whole show thanks to Charlie Day’s hilarious songwriting. This episode shows the gang trying to win an award for Paddy’s Pub so they decide to host an event for local critics. Charlie had prepared a lovely song to sing on the piano but as usual, he takes some drugs and starts to sing about spiders inside his soul before bursting into a chorus telling the audience to “go fuck” themselves. It’s the perfect response to the awards bodies in reality and is done with that amazing Always Sunny creativity. What better way to address your critics than by grabbing their attention and annihilating them? Always Sunny has never been the type of show that follows the crowd anyway so this episode is the perfect response that reflects this.

4) “A Very Sunny Christmas”, Season 6

In America, this episode is released in two parts but on Netflix UK, “A Very Sunny Christmas” is released as one long episode so I will be referring to both parts. Taking on the structure of A Christmas Carol, “A Very Sunny Christmas” shows the Gang’s attempt at getting Frank to get into the Christmas spirit. When growing up, Dee and Dennis would be subject to Frank’s pranks as their father would wrap up empty boxes and pretend they have gifts in. What tips the siblings over the edge is when Frank buys himself a designer handbag and Lamborgini which is what Dee and Dennis always wanted, respectively and it drives them insane. They recruit an old friend of Frank’s, Eugene, to act as Ghost of Christmas Past in a bid to get him to change his act with hilarious consequences. What puts this episode in my top 5, however, is a musical stopmotion animation sequence that is gory, crude and absolutely hysterical. Showing Frank being tortured and mutilated by the Gang for his behaviour, it helps him come to terms with how he treats them.

3) “McPoyle vs. Ponderosa: The Trial of the Century”, Season 11

Sometimes there are episodes that only focus on one character and then there are those that bring everyone together. This episode is amongst the latter and is a hilarious conclusion to the Ponderosa-McPoyle wedding fiasco. Bill Ponderosa is being sued for spiking the punch with bath salts by Liam McPoyle who lost an eye during the wedding. Charlie’s Uncle Jack agrees to be Bill’s lawyer and it is Jack who delivers my personal favourite moment in any Always Sunny episode. Ever. Uncle Jack has an obsession with large hands and wears giant fake hands over his own so no one knows that his hands are small. When interrogating a witness, Jack dramatically points to the McPoyles and one of his hands flies off to which he shrieks “NOBODY LOOK” repeatedly and runs to collect the hand. It is truly one of the funniest moments in comedy and had me in stitches long after the episode. The episode also features the unnamed Lawyer, representing the McPoyles who is one of my favourite side characters in Always Sunny for his deadpan sarcasm.

2) “Mac Finds His Pride”, Season 13

One thing about Always Sunny is that it is able to balance its comedy and seriousness well. This episode is a prime example of that. In “Mac Finds His Pride”, we see Mac trying to find comfort in coming out publicly with the help of Frank. Throughout the episode, Frank states that he doesn’t understand it but he accepts Mac but Mac struggles with how to come out to his dad, Luther, who is in prison. The result is a dance sequence where Mac performs with a professional dancer in a piece that explores his journey to acceptance. It’s a beautiful routine that would have taken a lot of practice to perfect and it also shows Rob McElhenney’s dedication to the character. Doing this dance would have seemed so out of character for Mac a few seasons before but the way McElhenney has developed Mac’s character through the years, it is the perfect way to let him come out. It’s a bittersweet ending to a season that has seen Mac really come to accept himself for who he is.

1) “The Nightman Cometh”, Season 4

Probably the most iconic episode to date, “The Nightman Cometh” accumulates everything we love about Always Sunny and puts it into a 20 minute masterpiece. Charlie enters the bar and announces that he has written a musical which he and the gang will be performing. Incorporating characters created in the previous season, the musical tells the story of a boy’s journey to manhood by defeating a troll and the evil Nightman thus becoming Dayman. It’s bizarre and is full of dark undercurrents but the songs are catchy and hilarious. It shouldn’t work but it absolutely does and will have you falling on the floor with laughter. From songs such as “Tiny Boy, Little Boy, Baby Boy” to “Troll Toll” to the iconic “Dayman”, the musical is filled to the brim with innuendo but what makes it funny is that Charlie doesn’t intend for it to be rude at all. He is confused by the Gang’s concern over the lyrics and becomes irritated when they decide to take creative control over their characters. Even if you haven’t watched Always Sunny, I would definitely recommend giving this episode a watch. It’s hilarious, bonkers and shows what the Gang does best which is ruin everything.

So there you have it! My top five Always Sunny episodes. I think each choice perfectly shows a different reason as to why I love this show and there were so many that didn’t make the list that would be just as deserving. With the 15th season due to arrive in 2021, now is a perfect time to rewatch all of the seasons on Netflix in time.

What do you think of my list? Which Always Sunny episodes are your favourite? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

The Lighthouse (2019)

Robert Eggers’ follow-up to 2015’s The VVitch is a mind-bending mesh of chaos, insanity and broken masculinity. Starring Robert Pattinson and Willem Dafoe as two lighthouse keepers who are stranded on the island after a storm hits, The Lighthouse shows the men’s mentality break and crumble in a fashion never before seen on film. Co-written by Eggers and his brother Max Eggers and inspired by the unfinished short story “The Light-House” by Edgar Allan Poe, The Lighthouse is a brilliant look into madness and mayhem from the outset as the protagonists drink themselves into oblivion when a storm hits. Distributed by the illustrious A24, the film has become instantly iconic for it’s beautiful cinematography, brilliant screenplay and magnetic performances. It is a film that commands attention from the outset and despite it’s simple plot, it is sublimely complex and groundbreaking. Eggers has proven yet again that he is a filmmaker to watch. More like his contemporary Ari Aster (Hereditary and Midsommar), Eggers is bringing a new perspective on the horror genre. His films are not afraid to be gory and disgusting in a different way while also bringing in dark humour and aspects of magic realism. Incorporating sea folk such as mermaids and sea monsters in a space where they are clearly fantasy to begin with but slowly slip into the reality and getting to the point where their existence could be argued.

Robert Pattinson proves that he is on a promising streak of strong performances following his stellar turn in Claire Denis’ erotic sci-fi High Life (you can read my review here). Pattinson plays Ephraim Winslow, a newbie to the lighthouse keeping game who is put to strenuous tasks by the elder Thomas Wake. When he finds a mermaid ornament hidden in his mattress, Winslow becomes fascinated by the eroticism that the sea has and becomes sexually obsessed to the point where his fantasies and realities collide. Even he doesn’t know what is real by the end of the film. The events in the film act as an awakening for Winslow as well as proving to be his demise. He’s a character who never feels settled and is clearly out of place in the job. His inability to understand why what they do is important and Wake’s reluctance to allow him to see the light actually prove to be motivators for Winslow as he doesn’t allow the job to overwhelm him. Pattinson’s character is manic, quiet and calculating at the same time and I think this film is solid proof of how far he has come from his Twilight days. Considering he found fame in a mainstream franchise and will be starring as the titular character in the new Batman film, I think starring in indie films like The Lighthouse shows Pattinson’s passion and his desire for good characterisation and artistic growth.

Williem Dafoe and Robert Pattinson in director Robert Eggers THE LIGHTHOUSE.

Willem Dafoe gives a flawless performance as is expected. Undoubtedly one of the best working actors today, Dafoe’s portrayal of the elderly Thomas Wake is a revelation. He is boisterous and unafraid to stand his ground, having no trouble delegating all the hard work to his companion. At the same time, there are many moments when Wake will change his stories and claim that the stories haven’t changed at all. It’s a role that requires fearlessness which is something that Dafoe has in spades. Known for his controversial roles and ability to play any character to perfection, Dafoe manages to reach yet another career best which is amazing considering the performances he has pulled off the past few years, particularly his turn in The Florida Project. What differs with his performance in The Lighthouse, however, is that this role feels more fantastical and removed to how we usually see Dafoe and the result is immense. I firmly believe that he was deserving of Supporting Actor nominations through awards season but it wasn’t to be as The Lighthouse was shut out from most categories. I think what Dafoe does brilliantly is challenging himself and showing time and time again just how much range he has as a performer. Wake is a despicable man who takes advantage of his protegee and yet he is captivating, incomprehensible and misunderstood.

The score by Mark Korven marks his second collaboration with Eggers after providing the eerily fantastic music for The VVitch. Created in a similar vein to the aforementioned, the score for The Lighthouse is clearly inspired by old maritime songs and merged with traditional horror tones. The result is a suspense filled mesh of mayhem that stands out clearly against the black and white backdrop of the film. It feels timeless and yet not suited for any time with its standoffish tone. There are many jarring string pieces that are like the tempting siren but then contrasting with the stormy surrounding and building tension as the relationship between the protagonists becomes more unbearable. Looking back, this has been a fantastic year for movie scores and even among all the best soundtracks, The Lighthouse proves to be equally simple yet effective, heightening the viewing experience.

lighthouse2

I think this is a film that has the potential to go down as a horror classic. It feels experimental and brave, pushing the boundaries on film-making through the use of its contrast between simplicity and complexity. It’s a horror in many ways from its gore to its mental abusive nature and the inability to trust in its lonely characters makes it a nail-biting experience. I think it’s a real shame this was locked out of almost all categories but glad that Jarin Blaschke was recognised for his phenomenal cinematography. The Lighthouse has proven to be a marmite film among film lovers but it is a deeply rewarding experience and the vision is executed beautifully. It’s a film that I look forward to viewing again and again as I think I’ll notice even more elements that I admire. It makes me keen to see where Eggers’ career will take him next and eager to see if he continues with his great collaborations.

What did you think of The Lighthouse? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Frances Ha (2012)

Watching this for the first time during university was truly revolutionary. Noah Baumbach’s film follows the titular character (played flawlessly by Greta Gerwig), a contemporary dancer who struggles to maintain a secure lifestyle in New York after her best friend Sophie (Mickey Sumner) moves out of their apartment. Filmed in black and white, stripping back the New York background in a way that feels like an homage to Woody Allen’s Manhatten, Frances Ha is witty and heartbreaking while creating a brilliantly developed character who feels real and leaves you thinking long after the credits roll. Directed by Baumbach and co-written by him and Gerwig, Frances Ha has earned its place among the great indie films of the 21st century for its mix of quick wit and improvisation. Following Frances and told from her perspective, Frances Ha is a seemingly simple film in that it doesn’t explore a specific plot but it demonstrates the struggle young people have and what they will do in order to achieve their dreams.

Frances Halladay is enigmatic and fiery. She has an array of bad habits such as smoking and bad money management but she has a passion for life and sees the magic in the everyday. This love for life is magnetic and we begin to see New York from Frances’ perspective. Her New York is an entirely different place. She has plenty of struggles but somehow she is able to bounce back and flit from place to place knowing that everything will figure itself out in the end. Despite not having a “real” plot, the film sees Frances become reliant on herself. Her initial identity is completely tied to Sophie but when Sophie moves, Frances is forced to carve her own path. She’s one of my favourite characters in film with good reason. She’s quirky, doesn’t let go off her dreams and importantly, doesn’t allow a man to dictate or motivate any action unless she wants it to. For all her flaws, Frances brings her strength subtly and isn’t aware of her own power.

Frances Ha allows a deeper focus on characters rather than plot. The natural approach the actors bring mean that the audience forgets that they are watching a film rather than a documentary. Mainly set and filmed in New York, there are also scenes that take us to Sacramento and Paris. No matter where Frances goes, she doesn’t change and the world remains just as black and white as ever. We see Frances at a turning point in her life. At 27 years old she is starting to lose a grip on her dream as a dancer and begins to understand that she will have to compromise to maintain security. Because it’s not plot driven, it feels as though the audience has stepped into this moment in her life and that there will be a big breakthrough for her but Baumbach is a grounded visualist brings a more realistic approach and finds a more believable solution.

I have touched on the cinematography before but it deserves its own observation. Baumbach’s New York feels like it doesn’t belong in a specific time or place. The decision to film in black and white definitely contributes to it but also Frances’ ability to largely avoid modern culture and do her own thing gives the film a detachment and allows it to become immersed in its own universe. The decision to make it black and white added a quirky aesthetic to the film and made it a talking point but ultimately, it is a film that relies heavily on its actors and Gerwig in particular who is in the majority of the film. Inspired by the French New Wave, the film is minimalist and brings a European style to the US. Although it doesn’t bring whistles and bells, it is contrasted by Frances’ extroverted personality. Without Baumbach or Gerwig, Frances Ha would not be the film it is and would not be the indie success that it is.

There is something that continuously draws me in with Frances Ha. Every time I watch it I notice something new whether it is a particular performance, the cinematography or the writing. It’s a film that maintains its topics and place in the mumblecore movement. As both Gerwig and Baumbach’s careers have skyrocketed to new heights with both releasing two of the best films of the year with Little Women and Marriage Story respectively, it’ll be great to see them collaborate again. Their 2015 film Mistress America which was their last collaboration was also a fun watch but for me, it is Frances Ha that remains my favourite. It’s a film that is strongly feminist and feels relatable as someone who aspires to make a living in the creative industry.

What do you think of Frances Ha? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Paul Thomas Anderson: Film Ranking

Paul Thomas Anderson is known for his experimental and fearless quest into exploring characters in ways that are unflinching and at times, uncomfortable.

With the exception of last place (I really struggle with the age-gap in the relationship), I’ve watched these films multiple times and some of them are among my favourite films of all time.

Here’s my ranking for the filmography of Paul Thomas Anderson:

  1. The Master (2012)
  2. There Will Be Blood (2007)
  3. One Battle After Another (2025)
  4. Boogie Nights (1997)
  5. Phantom Thread (2017)
  6. Magnolia (1999)
  7. Inherent Vice (2014)
  8. Punch-Drunk Love (2002)
  9. Hard Eight (1996)
  10. Licorice Pizza (2021)

Which PTA film is your favourite film? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (1966)

Based on the Edward Albee stageplay of the same name and marking Mike Nichols’ directorial debut, Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? follows older couple, Martha (Elizabeth Taylor) and George (Richard Burton) as the cracks in their relationship between to crack and crumble with the arrival of newlywed couple Nick (George Segal) and Honey (Sandy Dennis). Very much like the stage production, the film itself is minimalistic and relies on the strength of the actors’ performances which is provided in spades. Elizabeth Taylor who gives her best performance since her Tennesee Williams duo with Cat on a Hot Tin Roof (1958) and Suddenly, Last Summer (1959).

The screenplay is nothing short of amazing. Adapted by Ernest Lehman and there are only minor differences to the film, largely due to location. The Albee play is set only in Martha and George’s house whereas the film gives us a short break in a local roadhouse. It’s not a change that creates any detriment to the film and makes for an opportunity to see how these characters act outside of the comfort of the homely setting. Martha and George’s son is given a name in the film, Nick, in the film adaptation but does not have a name in the play. Again, this is an understandable change as it creates a more emotional charge for the audience as it feels more “real” and relatable when giving him a name. This is similar to the narrator in Truman Capote’s novella Breakfast at Tiffany’s who is given the name, Paul Varjak, which probably makes it easier to confirm especially when protagonist Holly Golightly refers to him as “Fred” after her brother. Changes as small as these don’t compromise the vision of the film and in Lehman’s case, it brings a different dimension to Albee’s play and enhances it in some ways.

Taylor had had her fair share of turbulance with the press and public as her lifestyle and general sexuality was judged and she was seen as a poor role model but this film allows us to see that she isn’t afraid to “deglamourise” and get gritty when needed. She has always been a brilliant actress as previously proven but portraying Martha gives us a chance to see the darker side as Martha manipulates and instigates. She is such an unlikeable character but Taylor has such a presence that it is impossible to feel Martha’s power as she dominates with her physicality. She manipulates the audience into feeling how she wants them to feel, gaining sympathy when needed and repulsion when required. Her performance is nuanced and showed that her career was far from over.

Richard Burton on the other hand plays the oppressed husband waiting to explode as Martha provokes again and again. One of the best actors of the Golden Age of Hollywood, Burton was seriously undervalued during his lifetime and found himself without an Oscar despite seven nominations under his belt. This was indeed one of those performances and despite his brilliance, this really is Taylor’s film. That isn’t to say that his performance isn’t excellent because it is among his best of the best and shows the potential that he was capable of being succombing to alcoholism.

The supporting actors, Segal and Dennis shine as the young couple seemingly in love. The longer they spend time with the miserable elders, they start to see parallels in their own relationship. Sandy Dennis is particularly eyecatching as Honey, the initially subdued housewife who then begins to disagree with her husband. It captured the Academy’s attention as well who award her with the Best Supporting Actress gong. The arrival of the young couple gradually means that the film becomes a game of Chinese whispers as secrets are thrown around to the wrong people and conflicts happen every five minutes. It’s a spiderweb of the complexity of relationship and ultimately seeks to find the foundation of their relationship and destroy it. The ending then leaves the question of what happens next as their years of marriage and lies lay bare in front of them.

The film is a great example that plays can be adapted successfully to the big screen without making big compromises. The film allows the actors to bounce off each other rather than blending into a spectacle. Seeing Taylor and Burton onscreen is always a treat as well and to see such volatile performances makes the film raw and honest. It’s a film that feels enormously progressive for its time as the couple grieve over the death of their son, deal with their bad habits and open up about their tumultuous marriage. The characters are not trying to be likeable because they react as their character would react rather than catering to a Hollywood audience as the big studios would play it.

What do you think of the film? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Top 5 Daniel Day-Lewis Performances

When it comes to listing the greatest actors in history, it would be pretty arrogant to not throw Daniel Day-Lewis’ name into the mix. The man puts the method in method acting and is renowned for his ability to truly become his characters. His refusal to break character offscreen or follow the typical hollywood lifestyle brings a sense of mystique to this genius who clearly has a passion for acting. Famously selective about his roles from early on in his career, he may not have the most extensive filmography but what is there is only the best and is full of brilliant collaborations with the best actors and directors.

He is the only actor to have won the Best Leading Actor Oscar three times and remains a titan in acting, even if he has retired (he has “retired” before and returned so who knows if this retirement will stick). Day-Lewis is in a league of his own when it comes to actors working today (the closest would probably be Joaquin Phoenix or Gary Oldman).

It’s been hard to pick top 5 but I have managed to do so. Here is my list of top 5 performances in chronological:

My Beautiful Laundrette (1985)

This early entry in Day-Lewis’ filmography is perhaps one of his most controversial. Made in 1985, Day-Lewis portrays Johnny Burfoot, a white Londoner who embarks on a romantic relationship with Omar Ali (Gordon Warnecke) who is struggling with his identity as a British-born gay man of Pakistani descent in volatile, racist Britain. The eeriness of this film comes in how relevant it feels today 35 years on. Stephen Frears refusing to bow to stereotype in this film, creating characters that are rounded and break the mould. In a general landscape that isolated homosexuals, My Beautiful Laundrette shows a relationship filled with adventure and excitement. The chemistry between the two leads is magnetic and it’s great to see a film about a gay couple that has a happy ending, something that is notoriously refused in the majority of mainstream LGBT+ cinema.

My Left Foot (1989)

The one that propelled Day-Lewis to stardom. Portraying disabled artist Christy Brown, Day-Lewis went full method for the role and refused to break character offscreen to channel the struggle of Brown’s experience with cerebral palsy. It brought Day-Lewis a global audience and his first Academy Award nomination and win. Christy is mischievous and hilarious, aiming to live his life to the fullest. A supporting cast led by Fiona Shaw who plaus Dr. EIleen Cole, Christy’s carer and Brenda Fricker as Bridget Fagan brown, Christy’s mother (who also won a Supporting ACtress Oscar for her performance) brings an authneticity to this low-budget Irish production. The film relies on the performance of its actors and refuses to use any Hollywood flares or special effects. This is a great introduction into the career of Daniel Day-Lewis and shows how capable and fearless he was from early in his career as well as providing an insight into what will become a flourishing and groundbreaking filmography.

Gangs of New York (2002)

The film that paired Day-Lewis up with Martin Scorsese for an epic that explores the conflict between Irish and Italian Americans. Based on a true story, it’s a film that explores what it takes to be a “true” American. In this nativist vs. immigrant plot, Day-Lewis plays William “Bill the Butcher” Cutting, a cruel leader of the nativist gang who refuse to allow the Irish settlers ownership on American land. Leonardo DiCaprio plays Amstardam whose father Vallon (Liam Neeson) dies at the hands of Bill in the opening scene and seeks his revenge years later under his new alias. The film itself falls short of its potential due to its odd pacing and the overall scope of the film feeling too big for its three hour running time but Day-Lewis’ performance elevates it and makes it worth the watch. Bill is maniacal and devious with no redeeming quality but he is also extremely charismatic. It’s flamboyant and subtle at the same time. Only Day-Lewis could pull the performance off in this way.

There Will Be Blood (2007)

The role to end all roles. The character of Daniel Plainview is nothing short of iconic. Day-Lewis is on fire in this role as a greedy prospector who soughts to purchase land that sits on oil. The film deservedly won him his second Best Actor Academy Award and for good reason. It’s a brilliant performance that shows the true greed of mankind and how much they are willing to destroy in order to gain more power. This film marks his first collaboration with Paul Thomas Anderson and serves as a definite high point for both of their careers. They are a duo who click together so well with Anderson’s penchant for brilliant character development and Day-Lewis’ commitment to character is unlike any other. It’s the movie that gave us “I drink your milkshake” in what can only be described as one of the best film endings. Add Paul Dano to the supporting cast and you have one of the best combinations of a director/writer and cast seen in 21st century film.

Phantom Thread (2017)

Day-Lewis’ “final” role sees him reunite with Paul Thomas Anderson as a renowned couturier, Reynolds Woodcock, inspired by a culimation of designers including Charles James. He’s a man with an inpenetrable exterior that is soon challenged by a chance encounter with waitress, Alma (Vicky Krieps) who becomes his muse when his creativity wanes. They spark a professional and romantic relationship and his business starts booming again as Reynolds finds his inspiration to design. Always watched over by his eagle-eyed sister, Cyril (Lesley Manville), we see the highs and lows of Reynolds’ career and the challenges he faces when the sparks begin to fade. The character contrasts greatly with the previous Anderson outing. Reynolds is a more subdued character who can say just as much with a simple grimace or flourish of the hand in the same way that Daniel Plainview used his persuasive chat to manipulate. Day-Lewis was deservedly nominated for the major awards in what is a beautiful swansong to a brilliant career.

As you can see, there are many brilliant performances that didn’t make the list, in particular In The Name of the Father (1993) and Lincoln (2012), the latter of which won him his third Best Actor gong. It’s always difficult choosing my favourite performances but how do you do it when pretty much every performance is perfect? There really is no wrong answer when it comes to Daniel Day-Lewis as it is likely that you will feel impacted by his performances.

Which film is your favourite from Daniel Day-Lewis? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Joker (2019)

I don’t know if there has been such a hype around a film with added polarisation to boot. Todd Phillips’ origin take on iconic villain in Joker shows how Arthur Fleck, a failed stand-up crippled with mental illness who rebels against a system that seems rigged and only rewards those born into riches and fortune. Arthur struggles to navigate his way in Gotham City which has gradually become more violent as the rich continue to cut public funding. I previously did a Top 5 Joaquin Phoenix performances post which you can read here in anticipation for this film. As I predicted, Joker would easily slip into the best of the best from an actor who can’t do any wrong. Joker also won the Golden Lion at Venice Film Festival which is unheard of for a franchise superhero film because of its groundbreaking venture and reluctance to fit in with a particular aesthetic that audiences and critics are used to.

Todd Phillips shows his talent for direction with this film. Taking inspiration from some of the best directors in history, mainly Martin Scorsese, Phillips achieves in making an epic based not on a superhero franchise but on a character. This film is rich in character development that it would weirdly fit in with the films of Paul Thomas Anderson. It’s refreshing to see someone venture into a different genre of film despite his ridiculous motive. An obvious element to point out would be that the film is told from Arthur’s perspective in contrast to the numerous Batman films that only see the Joker from Bruce Wayne’s point of view. Phillips allows us to not necessarily sympathise Joker’s actions but to understand his view of a city that ignored him for years and stomped on him daily. Phillips throws us into a specific period of his life rather than showing us his life thus far. What we learn about Arthur’s background is varied and unreliable so it becomes hard to grasp Arthur as a person. What we do gain is that he has lead a life that has pulled him in all sorts of uncertainties and directions but when he is dressed as a clown, he feels comfortable behind the guise.

As expected, Joaquin Phoenix is nothing less than extraordinary and this role will almost certainly bring him an abundance of award wins I think. He is arguably the best working actor today. This may be his time to win a long overdue Oscar (he should have won for The Master really) but that’s not to say that it wouldn’t be deserved if he won for this. Arthur Fleck is a deeply complex character. His mental illness leaves him extremely vulnerable as seen in the opening scene when a group of teenagers take his sign and subsequently beat him up, he’s physically malnourished with Phoenix losing 50 pounds for the role. There are so many layers and sides to this character that he becomes increasingly unreliable and the uncertainty in his actions makes for a terrifying experience. There’s no predicting his motives or what he will do next. If I had to draw comparisons from another Joker, it would have to be Jack Nicholson’s particularly in the chat show scenes but that’s only a glimmer as Phoenix has managed to pave a way for his own Joker. Phoenix is an absolute powerhouse of acting and even those who dislike the film have respect for his portrayal. It’s a performance that shows the physical and mental consequence to actions made by those seen as “higher” and “superior” than himself.

JOKER-Final-Trailer-1-54-screenshot.png

As far as other characters go, we have a supporting role led by Robert De Niro who is making a welcome return from a few years of very questionable choices in film as Murray Franklin, Gotham’s most popular talk show host. Arthur idealises this man but what he doesn’t realise is that Murray is a product of the society that threatens to marginalise him further. He broadcasts a portion of Arthur’s failed stand-up routine for the whole of Gotham to see and isolate him further. Arthur appears oblivious to Murray’s behaviour initially and eagerly accepts and invitation to be on his show in which he is ridiculed further but Arthur isn’t as vulnerable as it seems and his appearance on the show makes for one of the most intense scenes in film this year. I hope De Niro keeps this up and with The Irishman coming out later this year, I am hoping this marks a return to the actor that we loved before Dirty Grandpa.

My favourite scene would have to be the Bathroom Dance scene in which Joker finds his way to a grimy public bathroom and dances with himself. The combination of Phoenix’s whimsical nature and the dark, vibrant score that provides an undertone for what had occurred in the previous scene. Hildur Guðnadóttir’s award-winning score for Joker was one of my major highlights aside from Phoenix. It feels that the score and the character are connected as the score weaves its way through Arthur’s movement. In this scene, the two are combined as one and it is as if this is the music in his mind. If any scene could be used to sum up the film, it’s this one. The Joker is known for his violent outbursts but this scene sees him literally celebrating a triple murder. It’s a different side that we see for a character who had thus far been victimised and pushed down.

I was excited for Joker since I am a huge Joaquin Phoenix fan but, to be honest, the hype surrounding the film made me less and less excited and I was unsure whether I would enjoy. However, I was not let down and thoroughly enjoyed the film from beginning to end. As someone who has experience with mental illness, it was refreshing to see mental illness portrayed in a way that seemed unfiltered and honest. Of course, the character of Arthur Fleck isn’t one to aspire to but the film shows a picture of how those less fortunate are left to fend for themselves when thrown into difficult situations. Joker is a film that lends itself well to the DC franchise but also as a standalone in its own right. It’s depiction of a broken character who becomes even more fragmented is unafraid and undoubtedly a reflection of society today. The film feels progressive and risky while also remaining loyal to a character that has been well-loved for decades.

Categories
Uncategorised

Unpicking the Witch: Suzy and Rose in Retrospect

When watching Dario Argento’s horror classic Suspiria (1977) and its thematic sequel Inferno (1980), it’s understandable that the mind would instantly capture the bright cinematography and bloody violence that occurs throughout the film. What Argento doesn’t receive credit for, however, is the portrayal of its female protagonists, Suzy Bannion (Jessica Harper) and Rose Elliot (Irene Miracle). Both characters are artists with Suzy a student a prestigious ballet school and Rose an aspiring poet. Both find themselves living within the confines that house demonic and powerful witches who create darkness and chaos and delight in killing and torture. I love both of these films (I have written reviews on both which you can read here and here) with both leaving a lasting impact on how I view horror films. The writing is fantastic and the cinematography is highly creative but it was the portrayal of these women thrown into impossible circumstance and their determination and strength that stood out to me. Compared with the trend of horror films at the time where we see women portrayed as the damsel in distress and in need of a man to save them, Argento omits men almost entirely in Suspiria and the protagonist, Mark in Inferno is far from the traditional “strong men” that you tend to see in films.

Starting with Suspiria, Argento’s big breakthrough into English-language horror was a technicolour masterpiece filled to the brim with fake blood and guts. Following aspiring dancer Suzy, a new student at a prestigious dance school, as she begins to investigate mysterious disappearances of other students and staff alike. We first see Suzy leaving the airport in Freiberg into a torrential storm. The cuts and use of music when the automatic doors of the exit are opening and closing brings that otherworldly atmosphere to the film. Her introduction to the staff sees her intervene in an interview with the police when they enquire about a missing girl. What transpires is an environment in which Suzy becomes even more of an outsider than before as her bids to fit in make her stand out to the witches that run the academy. Naturally, Suzy is reluctant to believe the stories that her friend Sara tells her but as people begin disappearing one by one, Suzy becomes resourceful and finishes the mission that Sara started. Suspiria only has a handful of male characters with the bulk of the cast being made up of the female staff and students.

Rose Elliot in Inferno is much like Suzy in her ways. The film opens with her reading about The Three Mothers, three witches who use their dark powers to control the world. She is warned off the subject by a male antiquarian but she goes ahead with her investigation regardless. What follows is a fantastic scene in which Rose dives into a pool to retrieve a lost necklace. Upon swimming into a corpse, she is understandably frightened but still pushes on with her investigation and writes to her brother Mark, asking him to return to New York to help her. Rose’s mission doesn’t end happily and Mark ends up getting the credit but his findings are based on his sister’s research without whom he wouldn’t have figured out the mystery. Rose’s contribution to the film can be felt throughout despite her absence in the second half. Her character also seems more developed and intriguing than Mark which is odd for a genre that (at the time) excluded strong women from their narrative.

inferno_01.jpg

Both women are also artistic as discussed before and their talents not only add to their character development but these skills assist them in desperate times. Suzy’s curious nature inspires the witch to attempt a physical injury by inflicting a hemorrhage on her during class causing her to become bedridden. This fails to slow down her investigation, however, and the loss of best friend Sara inspires her to get to the bottom of things. The same could be said of Rose whose love of books and research adds to her observant nature and her ability to attune her focus on figuring out who owns the building.

I really enjoy both performances because the characters don’t come across as reliant even when they ask for help. They are indifferent to the male heroes we see in horror films. Argento also doesn’t sexualise the protagonists  which is refreshing to see as women in horror are usually subject to appearing in demeaning scenes such as unnecessary nudity and rape scenes. There’s a reason why his films are timeless and even watching now they feel current and progressive, showcasing his real talent for filmmaking.

What do you think of Argento as a filmmaker? Which film of his is your favourite? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Top 5 Joaquin Phoenix Performances

Undoubtedly the man of the moment in the film that has the festival circuit buzzing, Joaquin Phoenix is the frontrunner for awards for his titular performance in Todd Phillips’ origin story Joker. During a film climate that seems dominated by superhero films, Joker seems like it is doing something entirely different by twisting the tone and idea of the superhero movie. It feels that after years of playing the underdog in Indie features and his reluctance to entertain the spotlight, the mainstream media has finally caught up. It feels only right that I compile a list of my top 5 performances although it’s very tricky to do so.

Here’s my top 5 in chronological order:

Gladiator (2000)

I never thought Gladiator would be in a top anything list. Truth be told, I find the film overwhelming overall but the one element of it I absolutely love is Joaquin Phoenix’s brilliant performance as the evil Commodus, the power hungry son of Marcus Aurelius who gives power to Maximus (Russell Crowe) until a new empire is formed. His lust for power knows no bounds as he murders his own father and has Maximus arrested. It’s Phoenix’s performance that brings the real depth to this film. He could have easily played this role as a cartoonish villain but instead brings a snakelike presence to the character. His strength comes from the power that others give him rather than strength that he has by himself which comes to fruition in the final fight scene with Maximus.

The Master (2012)

Undoubtedly my favourite Joaquin Phoenix performance, The Master follows ex-marine Freddie Quell (Joaquin Phoenix) as he becomes involved with a cult called The Cause, led by Lancaster Dodd (Philip Seymour Hoffman) and his wife, Peggy (Amy Adams). I won’t dwell too much on this film, mainly because I have written an extensive review for this film (which you can read here). Phoenix brings his A game to his performance and it truly is a career best. The scene where he initially undergoes “Processing” with Lancaster in which his darkest secrets and even darker past are revealed. It’s a brilliantly shot scene that brings together to titans of acting and should have won both Phoenix and Hoffman Academy Awards.

Her (2013)

Spike Jonze’s romantic Her shows a tender side to Phoenix in the role of Theodore Twombly, a depressed soon-to-be divorcé whose job is writing intimate letters for people who are too afraid to do so. He is so emotionally intense and yet detached at the same time as he begins a sexual relationship with his OS (voiced by Scarlett Johansson). Featuring a stellar cast that is rounded off by Amy Adams and Rooney Mara, this was one of the best films of 2013 and brought Spike Jonze a much-deserved Oscar for his screenplay. It’s a saddening portrayal of love and heartbreak in the 21st century. This is a film that easily could have fallen into ridiculous due to its eccentric plot but the sincerity that Phoenix brings to the role allows the audience to become truly invested in the plot.

Inherent Vice (2014)

Phoenix’s second collaboration with Paul Thomas Anderson brings renowned author Thomas Pynchon to the big screen in what is the only adaptation to date. Based on the drug-infused novel, Inherent Vice, we follow Doc Sportello, an alcoholic, drug-loving cop in 1969 as he tries to bring down a drug lord. It’s a hallucinogenic mesh of colour, music and Joanna Newsom who stars as a narrator only Doc can see. The film itself is hugely underrated, possibly due to the fact that it is too bizarre for a lot of people. Being a big fan of Pynchon, I was so excited to see how it would work adapting one of his books into film and it works perfectly. Phoenix is perfect casting and carries off Doc’s happy-go-lucky attitude with ease. He heads up a star-studded cast fantastically and commands the screen whenever he is on it. He brings the perfect amount of slapstick while also keeping the character’s dignity intact. It’s truly a brilliant film that I think is wrongly overlooked.

You Were Never Really Here (2017)

Lynne Ramsay’s gritty New York City based nightmare follows Phoenix as hitman, Joe, who lives and breathes violence and killing all while living with his elderly mother in his childhood home. He specialises in rescuing trafficked girls. He’s a character who’s backstory is stained with violence and abuse and there isn’t much else that he is capable of doing. He is quiet and alone but happy in his loneliness. When tasked with retrieving a Senator’s daughter from traffickers, Joe embarks on his hardest mission yet. The film is bloody and holds no punches. It’s brutal from beginning to end with devastating results. The direction and writing is super tight and brought both Phoenix and Ramsay prizes at Cannes Film Festival in a rare double win.

With the release of Joker, it seems that Phoenix is going to break into the mainstream and he’s the frontrunner come award season. It seems that these awards are long overdue. If it were up to me, he’d have a couple of oscars in his cabinet already but sadly that hasn’t been the case. I’d hope that those who are introduced to phoenix’s talents as the Joker watch him in other films and see his talents beyond that superhero universe.

I’ll be posting a review for Joker as soon as its released and I’m looking forward to seeing whether it would break into my top 5.

What do you think of my list? Do you agree or disagree? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Inferno (1980)

Dario Argento’s second feature in his Three Mother’s trilogy transport us from the Freiburg set Suspiria (1977) to New York where a young writer, Rose (Irene Miracle), is suspicious of a curse within her building. After reading an antique book titled The Three Mothers, she finds that the apartment block she lives at was once occupied by one of the Mothers. The Three Mothers rule the world with sorrow (Mater Suspiriorum who lives in Freiburg), tears (Mater Lachrymarum who lives in Rome) and darkness (Mater Tenebrarum who resides in New York). With Mater Suspiriorum meeting her demise in Suspiria, we now see Mater Tenebrarum face off those who rebel against her rule in New York. Tenebrarum is the cruelest of the sisters and the deaths in this film definitely reflect that.

Directed and written by Argento, Inferno carries on the themes explored in Suspiria but on a seemingly bigger scale. The stronger scenes are those based in the Mother’s domains as their presence can be felt at every corner. Argento’s love for the dramatic is also carried on in this film with lingering suspense and exaggerated deaths. Upon a traumatic discovery in the cellar of her apartment block, Rose writes to her brother, Mark (Leigh McCloskey), who is studying music in Rome and begs him to come and help her solve the mystery. From the moment Rose posts the letter, deaths begin to happen to whomever the siblings come across with Mark dealing with Mater Lachryrum during his time in Rome. Like Susie Banyon (Jessica Harper) in Suspiria, Rose is a strong and independent female character which is refreshing to see in classic horror films. Romani Albani is brought on as cinematographer and does a brilliant job of bringing Argento’s vision to life by bringing contrasts throughout the film from the surreal apartment that Rose’s sickly neighbour, Elise (Daria Nicolodi) lives in to the gritty sewers of Central Park. It feels like visual growth from Suspiria.

The film is filled with suspense from start to finish with a breathtaking scene in the cellar as Rose tries to search for the clues to lead her to the mysterious owner of the building. When her necklace falls into a deep pool, she is forced to dive and founds an underwater ballroom in a scene that sets the tone for the rest of the film. Argento never allows the audience to feel settled and the only scenes that don’t contain scares or violence tend to be those where background story is given in Argento’s signature fairytale way. Even the introduction begins with Rose reading an excerpt from The Three Mothers aloud in a way that makes it seem like an adult fairytale. Much like Suspiria, the experience of Inferno is heightened by the amazing soundtrack with a score composed by Keith Emerson who does a brilliant job. He combines new electronic sounds with dramatic operatic pieces to add to the unbalanced ambience that the film creates. It’s a striking score that I think is overlooked due to the iconic association that Argento has with The Goblins who composed the stellar music for Suspiria. What Emerson does is create an entirely different film with his unique sound.

My favourite scene comes near the beginning of the film when we are first introduced to Mark who is attending a classical music session. As he tries to read Rose’s letter, he is distracted by Mater Lachrymarum who is disguised as a beautiful student (Ania Pieroni). He can see that she is mouthing something at him and he feels pain. It is an intense scene as the wind picks up and he is visibly uncomfortable. When he snaps out the pain, she has mysteriously disappeared and he accidentally leaves the letter behind. It’s a brilliant scene that uses the classical music as the main force of emotion as the gradual crescendo coincides with his building pain.

Although the film overall isn’t as tight as Suspiria, I think it is highly underrated. I think that Suspiria is a stronger film because it focuses on the first witch but Inferno brings in the remaining witches with the first act showing killings in Rome before travelling to New York. I think the short running time of 90 minutes means that we don’t spend much time in either place. On release, this film was critically panned but over the years has developed much love in retrospect. In some ways I find this film more interesting than Suspiria because it brings in the legend of The Three Mothers. Much like Suspiria, the aesthetic of the film is beautiful as well with Argento’s signature use of bright contrasting colours to set the mood of the scene and plenty of gore and blood throughout. There is clearly a lot of passion that was put in this film and it’s a shame that the film did badly on initial release. It’s a horror film that I think will only get better with time.

What do you think of Inferno? Did you like it or loathe it? Let me know in the comments below!

You can my review on Suspiria here!