Categories
Uncategorised

Hillbilly Elegy (2020)

Hillbilly Elegy is based on the memoir of the same name by J. D. Vance (Gabriel Basso) and follows his story as a Yale law student who faces issues when he is called back to his childhood home in Ohio after his mother, Bev (Amy Adams) overdoses on heroin. Directed by Oscar-winning filmmaker, Ron Howard with the screenplay written by Vanessa Taylor (who has received an Oscar nomination for co-writing The Shape of Water). The film flits between the present day J.D. who is having to travel to Ohio to help get Bev back on track and flashbacks showing J.D. as a child growing up in a broken home as Bev’s lack of stability leads to him being put in the care of his grandmother, Mamaw (Glenn Close). Hillbilly Elegy has been the subject of much controversy from the release of the book and even more so with the release of the film.

Ron Howard is a director who has a clear passion and love for filmmaking. His strongest deliveries are when he focuses on biopics with Apollo 13 (1995), A Beautiful Mind (2001) and Frost/Nixon (2008) proving to be his most successful. What makes these films so strong is the connection Howard brings with the source material. On paper, Hillbilly Elegy should have proved to be a success for Howard and bring him his most critically successful film since Frost/Nixon. The memoir contains a lot of political subtext as it delves into his own Republican tendencies and attacks on Democrats, particularly under the Obama administration. This is where much of the controversy lies and with Howard being hugely Democratic himself, he decided to take any political context out of the film altogether. I think this is a huge mistake and a reason why the film doesn’t reach its full potential. Of course Vance and Howard clearly have different political values which is absolutely fine, but taking away Vance’s own political point of view in a story that is hugely ruled by its politics is taking away a big part of his own identity and characterisation. Howard needn’t direct the film in a light that “favours” the political party he opposes but I think the context should have been included even in the background.

Now to discuss the acting performances. Amy Adams has been touted as the lead in this film and I have to say that in my opinion, that is purely a tactic to win more awards. Do not be fooled, Amy Adams is in a supporting role in this film and it should be categorised as such. This isn’t anything against Adams or her performance but it is a very misleading top billing. The true lead performances in this film come from Owen Asztalos and Gabriel Basso as young and adult J.D, respectively. Both do a really decent job capturing J.D’s struggle to fit in and his determination to do well in school and work towards a career in law. Asztalos, in particular, does a great job with the conflict scenes in which he sees his family life breaking apart without fully understanding what is going on.

In support, we have Amy Adams as Bev and Glenn Close as Mamaw. Clearly the stars of the show, both give it their all and do their best with the script. However, I do think Adams was miscast (a statement I never thought I would ever say). Adams is clearly trying so hard to convey Bev’s drug addiction and inability to lead a sober and stable life but the writing doesn’t do much for the character. We don’t feel any sympathy for Bev as she succumbs to her addiction and her behaviour seems to come across as erratic without reason or explanation. In the end, she is dropped off at a motel by J.D who has to leave to attend an interview. There doesn’t seem to be any closure to her issues in a way that feels substantial enough. Close, on the other hand, pulls off a more convincing performance that is subtle and captivates when she is onscreen. She isn’t onscreen a lot but I do think out of the two, she does give the better performance. Gaining a lot of favour for the Best Supporting Actress Oscar, my personal support for now is actually going toward Amanda Seyfried in Mank. Close is going to get her Oscar but I really hope it is for an even better performance.

Overall, Hillbilly Elegy is a film that does fall into the Oscar bait category. With Adams and Close being the living actresses with the most Academy Award nominations without winning one, the film is clearly driving the agenda to add that Oscar to their collections. However, I am a firm believer in giving awards to the performances that deserve it and both women have carried off performances that should have won in my opinion (Amy Adams for Best Supporting Actress in The Master and Glenn Close for Best Leading Actress in Fatal Attraction). I think giving either one an Oscar for their performances in Hillbilly Elegy would be a huge disservice to the phenomenal careers the two of them have had. They do the best with the material and direction they have been given but neither performance is in the top 5 (even top 10) for either actress. When summarising Adams or Close’s careers, it’s highly doubtful that Hillbilly Elegy is going to be discussed among their greatest films.

What did you think of Hillbilly Elegy? Let me know in the comments below!

Hillbilly Elegy is available to view on Netflix.

Categories
Uncategorised

Mank (2020)

There are few films that have generated such concersation this year than David Fincher’s new film, Mank. Following Hollywood screenwriter, Herman J. Mankiewicz (Gary Oldman) and the inception and creation of Orson Welles’ masterpiece, Citizen Kane, Mank is not your regular run-off-the-mill Hollywood film that glorifies filmmaking. Fincher looks into the dark side of film production and the manipulation that happens behind the scenes. Admittedly, I wasn’t sure what to expect going in beyond it having an amazing cast and crew and the backlash it appears to be receiving on social media but I personally loved it. Not only in its black and white appearance but the tone and direction reflects Citizen Kane which at points blends fact and fiction as Mank begins to succumb to the alcoholism that haunts him.

David Fincher’s direction is fantastic as ever and I truly think this may be the film that puts an Oscar in his hands. Based on a screenplay written by his late father, Jack Fincher, Mank is an intricate character study into the mind of a brilliant man who is challenged by the rules and regulations of the Hollywood Studios. In many ways, Mank feels as though you are watching a film from the Golden Age at points but from a behind-the-scenes vantage point. What is fantastic about how Fincher directs is the shift in tone. There are many points that feel like a thriller or even horror as Mank descends in madness while writing the project. The whole span of the film is sixty days and yet the amount of action feels as though it spans years. The passion Fincher has, arguably in part due to adapting his late father’s script, is evident and I think he does a flawless job at conveying the darkness that lies beneath the glamour. What is brilliant about Fincher’s films is that each one is completely different from the other. He truly is one of the most exciting filmmakers working today, even if his filmography isn’t the most extensive.

Gary Oldman’s performance has played a major part of the discussion in the conversations regarding the film. Playing a man 20 years his junior does seem a little miscast but look beyond this and there lies an amazing performance. Mank is such a layered man who loves his craft and his lifestyle yet isn’t afraid to bite the hand that feeds him. He treasures his friendships but risks it all in the name of his sharp wit and even harsher writing. Oldman is undoubtedly one of the best living actors and although Mank isn’t the best performance of his whole career, it’s still a fantastic turn.

The support in this film comes from Amanda Seyfried who, in my opinion, is the highlight of the film for me. Playing 1930s Hollywood icon, Marion Davies was no easy feat. During the Golden Age of Hollywood, Davies was well-known and admired and unfortunately her affair with William Randolph Hearst (Charles Dance) is what history associates her with. Seyfried will no doubt be nominated for a Best Supporting Actress and I really hope she wins. She’s given flawless performances, particularly in comedies in her early career such as Mean Girls (2004) and Jennifer’s Body (2009). Mank is a welcome dramatic stretch for her while still maintaining the intelligent wit Davies possessed. From her first scene, Seyfried is magnetic in the same nostalgic way the leading ladies were commanded to be.

There are many scenes in Mank that have stayed with me but the one that is the true standout is when Mank begins to discuss his plans for his upcoming film at a dinner that is attended by Marion Davies, Louis B. Mayer (Arliss Howard) and William Randolph Hearst no less. Oldman’s phenomenal acting in this scene is horrendously intense and extremely uncomfortable as he insults and berates the guests at the dinner before setting his attention on Hearst and discrediting his name and political career. Watching Mank make his way slowly around the table as the guests start to leave one by one until only Mank, Mayer and Hearst are the only ones left.

Overall, Mank is a fantastic insight into the overlooked mind behind what is often considered the greatest film ever made. The similarities in filming style of Citizen Kane and Mank are evident that go beyond the black and white stylistic choice. Citizen Kane may be about Hearst but really the creation of the film is primarily about Mank himself and his outlook on the world. Watching Citizen Kane with this new outlook will definitely make it a different experience. I have also been thinking of writing a David Fincher ranking list and it’ll be interesting to see where Mank would fall.

What did you think of Mank? Let me know in the comments below!

Mank is available to stream now on Netflix.