Categories
Review

The Tragedy of Macbeth (2021)

Shakespeare film adaptations are nothing new, as there have been an abundance of adaptations throughout the years. One of the most popular Shakespeare plays that has been adapted to film is Macbeth, which has had many film adaptations starting with the 1908 silent film. The newest addition to the Macbeth adaptation pile is Joel Coen’s The Tragedy of Macbeth. For those unfamiliar with Macbeth, the play (and this film), follows the titular character (Denzel Washington) and his ascent to the throne with the help of his Lady (Frances McDormand) of Scotland. Once he is King, Macbeth descends into madness and becomes a tyrant, causing a huge mutiny and attack from both England and Scotland, resulting in his downfall and eventual death.

The film is directed and written by Joel Coen and is arguably one of the best Macbeth cinematic adaptations that has ever been made thanks to Coen’s minimalist approach. The film is shot in black and white, but not only does this serve as a stylistic decision, it also ensures that the focus is on the text rather than the opulence. Coen’s adaptation is faithful to the play and his direction has clear focus on the characters. His respect for the source material is abundantly clear and the decision to have the actors speak in their original accents was a great choice as it means that more focus can be put on the words.

Denzel Washington leads as the titular character and completely embodies Macbeth through his rise and fall. What makes Washington such an effective Macbeth is that he provides the intensity and command required in such a role. Washington’s performance has been grossly overlooked this awards season with most award bodies only focusing on Will Smith in King Richard and Benedict Cumberbatch in The Power of the Dog. What Washington manages to achieve in this film is a deeply gravitating performance that draws you in from the moment he appears until the character’s eventual demise. The scene in which Macbeth ponders whether to go through with the murder of the King is among the highlights in the film.

You can’t have an effective adaptation of Macbeth without choosing a brilliant actress to portray Lady Macbeth. Who else was Joel Coen going to select except the incomparable Frances McDormand? McDormand is no stranger to Shakespeare, having played Lady Macbeth in 2016. Due to the dynamic shifts between Macbeth and Lady Macbeth, it is essential to have two actors who are able to carry off commanding and controlled performances. McDormand proves to be a perfect pairing for Washington’s Macbeth as she has an all-knowing presence about her. She perfectly encapsulates Lady Macbeth’s story arc from her manipulative methods in order to gain power through her husband through to her descent into madness. The scene in which she is sleepwalking around the castle and discussing the murder is eerie and ventures into horror territory thanks to the unpredictability of McDormand’s performance.

In one of the most captivating performances is Kathryn Hunter, who plays all three Witches and the Old Man. Hunter is a phenomenal actress who embodies the weirdness and otherness in the characters. Macbeth contains some of the most well-known Shakespeare quotes and a lot of them are delivered by Hunter. The scene in which the Witches visit Macbeth for the second time perfectly encapsulates the subtly and brilliance of Hunter’s performance, not relying on the bells and whistles that come with a lot of cinematic Shakespeare adaptations. Hunter’s acting ability comes through without any extra help, and it’s such a shame that her performance was overlooked during the mainstream awards.

The cinematography by Bruno Delbonnel is stunning and makes use of the various locations in the film. Despite the minimalism in the production design, Delbonnel manages to capture the world perfectly. Despite the use of numerous locations, there are many scenes in which there is a pinpoint focus on the characters themselves rather than their surroundings in order to draw in that focus. However, this doesn’t mean that Delbonnel isn’t able to incorporate innovative shots that make the film beautiful to watch. The scene in which Lady Macbeth is reciting a letter that Macbeth has sent her before setting fire to it is brilliantly shot, ending with the letter in flames as it floats away in the sky. The scenes in which the Witches visit Macbeth are both among the best scenes in the film thanks to their eeriness and simplicity, especially the second visit.

One of the best aspects of the film is the production design by Stefan Dechant, who has been nominated for an Oscar for his beautiful work on the film. The production design is innovative and works beautifully in the film, making use of the space and light in the film. Macbeth’s castle is large and empty, showing off the affluence and regality of the character’s station, while emphasising the emptiness and lack of fulfilment in the character’s life. Dechant’s production design is striking and clearly inspired by the stage, without feeling too “stage-like”. The scene in which Macbeth is visited by the Witches the second time has phenomenal production design as the Witches sit on beams above Macbeth as the character sits beside a pool of water and awaits to hear his fate. What makes the production design so effective is how simple it looks, but actually conveys the vastness of the land that Macbeth wishes to rule over.

The Tragedy of Macbeth may mark Joel Coen’s first solo project, but hopefully it won’t be his last. Coen’s minimalist approach allows the performances to shine, while also boasting innovative production design, wonderful cinematography, and a striking score. What makes the film so effective is how stripped back it is in its approach, meaning that the focus is on the text. It may not have the same level of flourish as other Oscar contenders, but it’s definitely worth the watch and marks one of Washington’s career-best performances.

What did you think of The Tragedy of Macbeth? Let me know in the comments below!

The Tragedy of Macbeth is available to watch on Apple TV!

Categories
Uncategorised

Spider-Man: No Way Home (2021)

Please note that there are spoilers in this review!

One of the biggest releases of the year was undoubtedly Spider-Man: No Way Home. Marking the last installment of the latest Spider-Man trilogy, we get to see Tom Holland make another great outing as everybody’s favourite neighbourhood superhero, Spider-Man. The film follows the aftermath of Spider-Man’s identity becoming known to the world following the events of Spider-Man: Far From Home and Peter Parker’s attempt to rectify the situation after his life and the lives of those he loves most including girlfriend MJ (Zendaya) and Ned (Jacob Batalon) as the trio are rejected from every college they applied for due to Peter’s notoriety. Inspired by previous events within the MCU, Parker seeks help from the reclusive Doctor Strange (Benedict Cumberbatch) to fix the situation but the spell goes awry and the multiverse is opened, bringing in previous villains from other Spider-Man films including Green Goblin (Willem Dafoe), Doctor Octopus (Alfred Molina), Sandman (Thomas Haden Church), Electro (Jamie Foxx) and Lizard (Rhys Ifans). The villains’ inclusion was known from the outset, but there was been a lot of speculation in the lead-up to the film’s release as there were rumours that Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield were due to join forces with Holland in order to fight the group which was in fact true and the result is a fantastic battle.

Spider-Man: No Way Home sees Jon Watts returning to direct following his previous efforts on Spider-Man: Homecoming and Spider-Man: Far From Home and is written by Chris McKenna and Erik Sommers. Where some franchises within the Marvel Universe can become inconsistent, especially when the teams behind the camera are changed on a regular basis but it feels that Sony and Marvel have done a great job ensuring that this Spider-Man trilogy is not only consistent, but shows growth and character development in a way that is slow-burning and believable meaning that watching them on release ensures that nothing feels too different from the preceding film while watching the three films together will clearly show Peter’s maturity develop and allowing the audience to see clearly differences between Peter at the start of Spider-Man: Homecoming and the end of Spider-Man: No Way Home.

Tom Holland is just as likeable as ever and in a film littered with even more stars from the Spider-Man universe, he is able to maintain his standing as the leading man with ease and hold his own against Macguire and Garfield’s Parker. What is great about Holland’s performance is that we see a more mature Peter compared to the previous installments while also capturing that glimpse of naivety that teenagers have during times of trouble. It’s a balanced performance that shows Holland capable of presenting us with a protagonist who finds that what is right and what is moral can be conflicting and the results of which can be devastating. His chemistry with Zendaya is also undeniable and the relationship between Peter and MJ feels as though it has grown so much since Spider-Man: Homecoming adding yet another layer to his performance as Peter.

As one of a couple female characters in the film, Zendaya is fantastic as MJ. MJ is not simply identifiable as Peter’s girlfriend but is defined by her intelligence and personality which shines through and the writing and Zendaya’s fearless performance ensure that MJ is an active part of the plan to defeat the villains. Where in the other Spider-Man films (as in Maguire and Garfield’s run), Mary Jane and Gwen were often reduced to the damsel in distress and used as a ploy for villains to get Spider-Man to fight them, MJ is never put in that box and consistently comes up with solutions for Peter to follow, despite not having the powers that he does.

The main event of the film was undoubtedly the return of Maguire and Garfield who bring their interpretations of Spider-Man to the film and the results are fantastic. Rather than just turning up at the final fight, Garfield and Maguire turn up around halfway through which gives plenty of time for the three Peters to become acquainted with each other and build a rapport that is enjoyable to watch and makes for one of the year’s best teams on film. It’s clear that each actor is having a blast with the role and that radiates from their performances. The writing picks up on the differences between each Spider-Man’s universe and includes jokes and comments such as Maguire’s Peter having no idea who the Avengers are while Garfield’s Spider-Man reflects on the loss of Gwen Stacy (which happened in The Amazing Spider-Man 2).

When it comes to the villain performances, the highlights are Alfred Molina as Doctor Octopus and Jamie Foxx as Electro. Doctor Octopus is initially seen as an unofficial leader of the group and Molina can always be counted on to provide a brilliant performance. Molina’s performance as Doctor Octopus is gripping from the outset as he has to deal with the confusion of being in an alternative universe while also encountering figures from his past who he believed had died. Spider-Man: No Way Home does a great job at blurring the lines between superhero and villain and this allows Molina to delve even deeper with Doctor Octopus’ character than ever before. Jamie Foxx is another highlight but in a different way. The Amazing Spider-Man 2 did not give Electro’s character the development and nuance needed for Foxx to really shine while the writing in this film does and Electro proves to be one of the best villain characters in the entire film thanks to his sharp wit and strong power that makes him incredibly hard to defeat. It’s clear that Foxx is even more comfortable and confident in the role in this film and the writing also helps to make Electro’s interactions with others feel more natural and believable when compared to his appearance in The Amazing Spider-Man 2.

On the surface, it can seem that there is too much going on in Spider-Man: No Way Home but the pacing of the film is perfectly done while still giving plenty of character development for the returning faces which makes it a fantastic watch. Being able to do justice for an interesting character like Electro who wan’t given much in The Amazing Spider-Man 2 was nice to see as well as allowing Holland, Maguire and Garfield to have plenty of fun as a team which makes the fight sequences incredibly fun to watch.

What did you think of Spider-Man: No Way Home? Let me know what you think in the comments below!

Spider-Man: No Way Home is available to view in cinemas now!

Categories
Uncategorised

London Film Festival 2021: Roundup

This year’s London Film Festival 2021 brought back some of the traditional elements of attending the cinema to see some of the films while others I had the pleasure of watching online. This hybrid experience made it both exciting and busy whilst also allowing me to see some of the biggest films of the year as well as some indie films I may not have had the chance to see otherwise (which is always a good thing!).

It’s become a little tradition to do a small awards at the end of each festival so it only makes sense to point out the highlights of my London Film Festival experience. From the Palme d’Or winning Titane to Jane Campion’s The Power of the Dog (her first film in 12 years!) to two of Ryusuke Hamaguchi’s new films, Drive My Car and Wheel of Fortune and Fantasy, there were so many films to see. In total, I saw 14 films with 3 of those being at Chapter Cinema in Cardiff (The Harder They Fall, The Power of the Dog and Titane) and the rest online, being successful in the online ballots for Petite Maman and Lamb so I got to experience the best of both mediums.

Here are the Smaller Pictures Winners of London Film Festival 2021:

Best Picture – Titane

Best Director – Julia Ducournau for Titane

Best Leading Actress – (TIE) Agathe Rousselle for Titane and Annes Elwy for Gwledd (The Feast)

Best Leading Actor – Benedict Cumberbatch for The Power of the Dog

Best Supporting Actress – Regina King for The Harder They Fall

Best Supporting Actor – Jason Isaacs for Mass

Best Original Screenplay – Julia Ducournau for Titane

Best Adapted Screenplay – Jane Campion for The Power of the Dog

Best Original Score – Jim Williams for Titane

Best Cinematography – Eli Arenson for Lamb

Best Editing – Julien Lacheray for Petite Maman

Best Production Design – Martin Whist for The Harder They Fall

Best Costume Design – Antoinette Messam for The Harder They Fall

Best Hair and Makeup – Olivier Afonso, Marison De, Amelie Grossier, Céline Llerena, Antoine Mancini and Flore Masson for Titane

Special Shoutout Winner – Ryusuke Hamaguchi for Drive My Car and Wheel of Fortune and Fantasy

The calibre of the films this year was so high and each film I watched had something important to say. With even more non-English language films being incorporated into the roster, it’s great to be given the chance to view even more films from around the world that I may not have had the chance to watch otherwise.

That’s it for my roundup! It’s been extremely busy and a lot of work but definitely worth it and makes me excited to see what next year will bring!

Here are the films I saw at this year’s London Film Festival in alphabetical order. My reviews for Gwledd (The Feast) and The Phantom of the Open were commissioned by Wales Arts Review so the link will take you to the page on their website:

Between Two Worlds

Boiling Point

Drive My Car

Gwledd (The Feast)

The Harder They Fall

Lamb

Language Lessons

Mass

Memory Box

Petite Maman

The Phantom of the Open

The Power of the Dog

Titane

Wheel of Fortune and Fantasy

Categories
Uncategorised

London Film Festival 2021: The Power of the Dog

It’s no secret that the COVID-19 pandemic saw the delay of many films which has resulted in a huge amount of quality films being released this year. One such film to suffer from pandemic delays is Jane Campion’s The Power of the Dog which is her first feature film in 12 years since 2009’s Bright Star. Based on the novel of the same name by Thomas Savage, The Power of the Dog follows the lives of two brothers, Phil Burbank (Benedict Cumberbatch) and George Burbank (Jesse Plemons) who own a family ranch and how their lives change when George falls in love with – and quickly marries – Rose (Kirsten Dunst), a widow whose former husband died of suicide. In true Campion style, the film provides deep characterisation, stunning scenery, and a script that is so beautifully written and paced that you feel completely immersed in the film and its time period.

Written and directed by Jane Campion, The Power of the Dog has proven to be a huge hit at festivals and it’s easy to see why. The film feels authentically Western in its slow pacing with her writing and directing giving the film plenty of chance to breathe. The way Campion utilises natural light in her film brings a rawness that allows the landscape to show off its natural beauty without using any filters or techniques. Equally, Campion’s ability to make the audience feel claustrophobic in the open space is so clever such as the scene when Phil and Peter are on their travels through the hills. What is so wonderful about Campion’s filmmaking is that she has such an intricate knowledge of space and how to make use of the space. In one scene, we see George and Rose driving back to the ranch after dropping Peter off at school and they are surrounded by rolling hills which seems to go on for miles; however, what was once an open space is gradually zoomed into George and Rose as they try to dance and it suddenly feels as though the space has become much smaller. Unsurprisingly, the film has brought Campion much acclaim for her directing and she even won the Silver Bear at this year’s Venice Film Festival.

Leading the film is Benedict Cumberbatch as Phil Burbank in what is arguably his best performance to date. To say that Phil is a deeply complex character is an understatement. He is a character plagued by his past as he constantly refers to his late mentor – and lover – Bronco Henry, who has since passed away. The result of which is a character that internalises who he is and replaces it with toxic masculinity, feigning power and confidence through brutality and strength. Phil’s leadership and charisma is hard to miss as he makes his presence known no matter where he is. Cumberbatch is captivating in a role that may seem mismatched at first but his dedication and relentlessness allows us to him in an entirely new light. He has become a firm favourite for the Best Actor awards this coming awards season and it is easy to see why. Even if he doesn’t win, he will definitely earn nominations in what is a performance of a lifetime.

Playing Phil’s brother, George, is Jesse Plemons and the two characters couldn’t be more different. Where Phil is overly observant to a fault, George is oblivious although his heart is in the right place. Unable to see his wife suffering or catering to her needs, George tries to force her into a societal position that she doesn’t feel comfortable with. This isn’t out of malice or bullying but because he does what he believes is expected of him. Plemons is always great no matter what role he does and it’s a treat to see him in a bigger role. The scene where George confronts Phil about the latter’s treatment of Rose is ridiculously intense and this is because Plemons and Cumberbatch manage to bring an authenticity to their roles that feels genuine and brotherly. Kirsten Dunst plays Rose, a woman who recently lost her husband to suicide and is struggling to run the family restaurant. She marries George shortly after meeting him but soon finds that her brother-in-law, Phil, does not approve of their marriage, believing her to be a gold digger. Dunst is one of a few women in the film but her presence is duly noted and she commands each scene she is in, especially as her character delves into alcoholism. The lack of female roles is completely on purpose as the film is showing what happens when an environment is dominated by men and, specifically, toxic masculinity. Rose’s background is completely different to Phil’s entirely and it is these differences that cause friction between them. The scene in which Rose practices on the piano and eventually finds herself in competition with Phil’s banjo playing is somehow terrifying and comedic at the same time. Dunst’s performance in this scene is brilliant as we feel the fear in the character and her emotional struggle as she cannot finish her piece.

Another performance in this film that has been receiving a lot of attention is Kodi Smit-McPhee’s turn as Rose’s son, Peter. The first time we see Peter, he is delicately cutting pieces of paper which are then shaped to make paper flowers which he then takes to his father’s grave. From his sensitive nature to his crisp and neat appearance, it is clear that there is something that sets Peter apart from the other men in the area. This is pointed out during his first encounter with Phil and the rest of the ranchers as Phil makes fun of Peter’s flowers and the way he dresses and carries himself. Assuming that he is homosexual, Phil and the other men hurl homophobic insults at Peter wherever he goes and bully him relentlessly; however, Peter appears indifferent to their insults and carries on with his research to become a medical doctor. Smit-McPhee’s performance is the perfect opposition to Phil. Where Cumberbatch’s performance is loud and commanding, Smit-McPhee’s is much quiet and subtle while still grabbing the audience’s attention. The climactic scene between Phil and Peter in the barn is incredibly intense and has the audience at the edge of their seat and this is due to Cumberbatch and Smit-McPhee’s flawless chemistry.

One of the many highlights in this film is the beautiful score which is composed by Johnny Greenwood. What makes Greenwood one of the best composers working today is the huge range of films that he has worked on. Whether it is a period drama such as The Master or a thriller such as You Were Never Really Here, Greenwood always knocks it out off the park. He has delved into the Western genre before with his game-changing score for There Will Be Blood and yet somehow, he manages to create a completely new and different sound for the music in this film. Featuring hints of Western and thriller, Greenwood integrates his signature sounds with atmospheric tones that work seamlessly with the film. The music never overwhelms the film itself and yet manages to stand out and elevate the mood of the scene. Hopefully we will see Greenwood receive another Academy Award nomination for his work and maybe even a win.

The Power of the Dog was a film worth waiting for and more. Hopefully, it will see a lot of recognition come awards season thanks to the breath-taking direction, stellar script and impeccable performances, especially by Cumberbatch. Campion has come back with a bang and here’s hoping she doesn’t wait as long before making her next feature.

The Power of the Dog is showing at this year’s London Film Festival!

Categories
Uncategorised

1917 (2019)

1917 is a World War I epic that seems to be the one to beat when it comes to the Best Picture award. Co-written, directed and produced by Sam Mendes, the film acts as a tribute to his grandfather, Alfred Mendes, based on stories that he would tell about the war. Following two young soldiers, Schofield (George MacKay) and Blake (Dean-Charles Chapman) who are tasked with travelling across enemy lines to warn off a British attack before they fall into a trap set by the Germans. The film has become well-regarded for its flawless editing, designed to look like two continuous shots. As well as beautiful technique, 1917 also boasts a stunning cast that includes well-loved actor of the big screen such as Colin Firth and Benedict Cumberbatch as well as TV favourites such as Daniel Mays and Andrew Scott. As expected, Mendes delivers and the continuous shots and editing only exemplify the non-stop nature of war. There is only one point in which the audience is allowed to relax at the start of the third act of the film. The writing is simple as Mendes lays focus on the physicality and the atmosphere rather than the dialogue. There are few monologues and those with speeches such as Andrew Scott’s Lieutenant Leslie are at rare moments of stand still. Co-written by Mendes and Krysty Wilson-Cairns, the script is minimalist in dialogue. Even when following the two Lance Corporals on their journey, we never really hear Schofield’s backstory because he is so withdrawn. One brilliant scene is when Schofield is picked up by a passing British unit and they are sat in the back of a truck. Schofield sits silently as the soldiers around him comment on their various backgrounds, imitate their General and comment on whether occupying other countries is worth the damage. It’s a poignant scene which brings in a humane aspect that is often missing from World War films.

The performances are impressive, particularly by George MacKay who is always on camera. He carries the film in the same way that he carries the message to the troops. It is no easy feat as an actor to hold so much pressure from such a big film but MacKay has shown promise from the early days in his career and his subsequent breakout performances in Pride (2014) and Captain Fantastic (2016). 1917 exploits MacKay to a mainstream audience that he won’t have been subject to in such a way previously. His Lance Corporal Schofield is reluctant to go on the mission and keeps his cards close to his chest but his determination to see it through is fearless, particularly in the final scenes as he runs through the trenches. Schofield and Blake appear to have different takes for their mission at the beginning. Blake is insistent on setting off immediately whereas Schofield logically believes in waiting until dark. Because of the emotional stake that Blake has in the mission (his brother is among the troops heading into the trap), Schofield has to ensure that Blake’s heart doesn’t lead his head.

1917

The two protagonists balance each other out as Blake risks his own life to save Schofield when a bomb is set off in a German trench. Chapman is also fantastic as Blake who appears naïve due to his sentimental nature. When encountering a German soldier whose plane was shot down in a dogfight, Blake’s gut reaction is to assist and get the soldier some water to ease the pain whereas Schofield doesn’t hesitate to shoot at the enemy. As mentioned before, the supporting cast is littered with stars from the small and silver screens. Admittedly, the supporting cast are granted one scene each so it’s more of a cameo, but each actor makes the most of their moments. Andrew Scott particularly delivers a brilliant monologue as a Lieutenant who has little hope in winning the war whereas Benedict Cumberbatch’s Colonel Mackenzie views he retreat from battle as a sign of defeat. The fleeting appearances from the supporting characters is thanks to the perfectly linear narrative of the film itself. We see the two Lance Corporals setting off to warn the Devonshire Regiment and ending with Schofield sat beside a tree in a mirror image of the opening shot.

It would be a big misjustice not to mention the revolutionary cinematography and editing provided by Roger Deakins and Lee Smith, respectively. Both men are at the top of the game in their respected fields and they work fantastically as a team. What these men have managed to achieve feels as claustrophobic and in your face as the war itself. There are many comments from people saying that the continuous effect took some getting used to but for me it felt natural and flowed perfectly. The editing is in a similar vein to the technique used in Birdman but on a bigger scale. What Deakins does so brilliantly is simultaneously provide big explosions shots filled with action while also maintaining great focus on the individual protagonists’ faces. Despite everything that is going on around the soldiers, the audiences’ eyes are fixated on the characters. Deakins’ colour palette is muted as expected in a war film with greens and browns. There are no exaggerated colours or futuristic spectacles. Deakins ensures that the film is very much grounded in its reality. Together, Deakins and Smith manage to create a film that is visually captivating and stunning, making the best use of the environment given and its limited landscapes.

19172

On the musical side of things, Thomas Newman’s score for this film is beyond incredible and has deservedly earned him his 15th Academy Award nomination. This year has seen a strong competition in the score category with both Thomas and Randy Newman pulling punches for their scores for 1917 and Marriage Story, respectively. Undoubtedly, the Best Original Score gong will go to Hildur Guðnadóttir for her stellar work on Joker making her the first woman to walk away with the award. It shouldn’t go unnoticed, however, that Thomas Newman’s score is among his best. Much like the editing, the film is reliant on its score which acts like a thread connecting the scenes. Needless to say, if Newman does end up winning, I wouldn’t be disappointed.

Overall, 1917 has proven to be a much better film than I had originally anticipated and I found myself moved and stunned by the technical and artistic achievement that Mendes has managed to pull off. I’m not sure if it’s a film that you need to watch more than once as I personally got everything out of the film that I needed in one go. I imagine that in time, it will become renowned and known for its technical aspects and the uniqueness in that field rather than the characters.

What do you think of 1917? Let me know in the comments below!