Tag: composer

Categories
Uncategorised

Princess Mononoke (1997)

Another day, another Ghibli review. Hayao Miyazaki’s Princess Mononoke is a Medieval set fantasy in the ancient land of folklore and Gods and the battle between Mankind and the spirits in the forest. The film follows Prince Ashitaka who is cursed by a dying boar and must venture to the West to find the reasons for his curse. He ventures to Irontown where the residents, led by the greedy Lady Eboshi, are on a mission to rid the forest of its Gods in order to mine up the iron and invade surrounding areas. In between these two parties is a young woman, San (also know as the titular character), who lives with the wolf Gods in the forest and whose mission is to kill Eboshi and put an end to Irontown’s plot to rid the world of the animal Gods. Ashitaka is immediately taken by San and sides with her to put an end to Eboshi while also finding out the meaning of his curse. The film is more violent than most Ghibli films and doesn’t shy away from showing rotting corpses, dismembered limbs and lots of blood but the film needs this to show the corruption within man’s unnecessary fight with nature. The violence that is perpetuated upon the forest and seeing the animal’s rebellion is heartbreaking. Miyazaki’s brilliant vision of contrasting palettes makes this a true fantasy epic as we venture from the deep jewel colours of natures filled with deep greens and blue hues to the abnormal reds and oranges that flare from the furnaces at Irontown.

Princess Mononoke features some of the best known characters in the Ghibli canon from San, the titular character to the various creatures that populate the forest, particularly the adorable Kodama, tiny spirits that guide the way through the forest. In true Ghibli fashion, San is a posterchild for strong female characters. From her first appearance sucking the bullet out of the wolf God and spitting the blood into the water, San doesn’t care how she looks. She doesn’t aim to please anyone and isn’t there to be sexualised or sought after. Ashitaka is drawn to San but San keeps him at arm’s length. She wants to help him but does not care for any romance. San’s reluctance to identify as human makes it easy for the audience to see her as inhuman. Her seemingly superhuman strength and speed makes her seem otherworldly. On the other side of the conflict, Lady Eboshi is a deeply conflict character who isn’t just a regular villain. In true Miyazaki fashion, she has her own understandable methods and a genuine desire to protect her people but she is ultimately on the wrong side of history in this instance. Eboshi is seen as a woman of civility and forward-thinking whereas the people portray San as an animal and treat her like the animals that she lives with. They do not hesitate in their attempts to kill her even though Eboshi confides her sympathies for San to Ashitaka.

The animation and style from this film is quintessential Ghibli. Drawing in on traditional techniques and meshing with this folklore and a modern feel, Princess Mononoke showcases the best of Ghibli and Miyazaki living up to his usual standard. The combination of nature and industrial is deeply satisfying and you are instantly transported to a different time. Despite being sets centuries ago, the technology feels new and unique. The designs of the spirit god’s, particularly the Forest God bring that sense of command and attention that such a character would demand from its audience. One of the best sequences has to include the opening encounter with the boar which is both grotesque and terrifying, setting the tone for the film. Contrast this with later scenes where the forest comes to life to make way for the Forest God.

If you have read my previous Ghibli related posts, you know that I absolutely love the composing genius that is Joe Hisaishi. A longtime Miyazaki collaborator, Ghibli films would not be the same were it not for Hisaishi’s contribution. This is mostly felt in Princess Mononoke, the soundtrack which I listen to everyday. It truly holds its own as an epic in its own right and brings the film’s overall status to epic proportions. Mixing traditional Japanese sounds with fantastical elements, we are thrown into the conflict between man and nature through Hisaishi’s genius use of pace and crescendo. The ending track titled “The Legend of Ashitaka” is easily one of my favourite musical pieces from any film. The piece feels as though it takes you through the emotional span of the entire film in its five minute running time. Starting off quiet and slow and then building with brass and becoming a loud and brash piece showing the tilt in man’s favour. I love how Hisaishi has his own style like Miyazaki and it honestly feels like you can’t have one without the other.

Princess Mononoke is usually ranked among the favourites and has been a popular choice since its release. It is a film that has mass appeal despite its maturity and content. There is a lot of detail to take in within every scene and such a brilliant use of locations and spaces. The era that it is set in is real but the addition of the Gods allows the creative team to think outside the box and bring their originality to the designs. Even the designs of animals such as the monkeys and the boars have an otherworldly feel to them. They are inspired by animals that exist but they don’t exist in the real world. This is something that Ghibli does best in that it blurs the line between real and fantasy, allowing the imagination to run wild. The film isn’t afraid to delve deep into serious issues with its overwhelming message on environmental destruction, the manifestation of greed in man and the corruption that it builds and the longing for power.

What do you think of Princess Mononoke? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Castle in the Sky (1986)

Hayao Miyazaki’s 1986 family action film, Castle in the Sky was the first film made under the Studio Ghibli brand (Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind was made before Ghibli’s inception although it is now included in the Ghibli catalogue). The film follows young orphan Pazu who catches a girl, Sheeta, after she falls from the sky and their mission to find the mysterious floating island of Laputa. Running up against pirates, the army and government, Pazu and Sheeta are thrust into a world full of corruption, greed and the abuse of nature. The world is crumbling thanks to the adults and it takes their childlike view to right the wrongs. On one level, the film is an engaging action movie that features extensive chase scenes and a variety of exciting locations. On a deeper level, the film can be explored as an analytical portrayal of mankind’s war on nature and the importance of working with nature and not fighting it.

What Ghibli achieves brilliantly in all of its films is that the films are never patronising to the audience. There is always something to think about. Even the child-friendly films like My Neighbor Totoro include undercurrent themes of death and loss. With Castle in the Sky, we are following two protagonists who don’t have families of their own but are there for each other throughout. That in itself is a hard fact to swallow as the characters are barely 10 years old and yet they survive with no complaints in this corrupt universe. When thinking of the most iconic Ghibli films, it’s easy to think of the likes of My Neighbour Totoro, Whisper of the Heart and of course the Oscar-winning Spirited Away, but I think somewhere Castle in the Sky has been lost in the conversation. There is something about this film that centres of the childlike vision that Ghibli likes to explore but blurs the lines by incorporating flawed heros and insightful dialogue. Every time I watch this film, I feel equally inspired and affected as the passion behind this film is impossible to ignore.

laputa2

Aside from the two protagonists, there are several parties who aim to find Laputa first. A group of pirates led by matriarch Captain Dola who is a fantastic character. The only female on the ship that includes her husband and multiple sons, Dola smashes the patriarchy and in many ways is a more fearing character than the actual villains. The pirates’ encounter with Pazu and Sheeta shows that they are not your typical blood and guts pirates as the film want you to believe but show that they do have a heart. Although I do prefer to watch the Japanese original with subtitles, I do have to mention the voicework of Cloris Leachman in the English dub. She becomes Dola and gives the character this commanding quality with an undertone of softness that makes the shift in storyline believable. On the other hand, we have Muska, a government agent who is consumed by the idea of power that he is willing to betray all those who work for him to climb to the top. Initially, Muska seems rational and good-natured but his plans are soon revealed as he plans to use Laputa as a military weapon of destruction.

The animation is spectacular and sets the standards for Ghibli films of the future. Incorporating a steampunk aesthetic with classic anime styles, Castle in the Sky becomes an oxymoron in scenery. It is so clearly an alternate universe but not wholly outlandish. The world the film inhabits could be described as a grounded fantasy. This could be because the issues explored in the film are very real issues but through the metaphor of Laputa, a physically and figuratively detached land that represents a country before military invasion. One recurring feature in Ghibli films is the satisfying attention to detail such as the intricate blades of grass, beautiful colour mixtures and palettes and food that makes your mouth water. There are so many beautiful aspects in this film but the most stunning creation has to be the robot and particularly, the robot who lives among the natural world within Laputa. It’s a contrast that flows together seamlessly and has formed one of Ghibli’s most recognisable icons.

My favourite part of any Ghibli film is by far the score and in particular, the scores composed by Joe Hisaishi. I would class Hisaishi as an unsung hero in Ghibli history as his music encompass the magical qualities that the films possess. The music for Castle in the Sky is no different and in fact ranks highly for my all-time favourite scores. Each character has their own unique piece of music and even the crystal has a distinctive piano run that sounds like a twinkling star. Every piece is beautifully crafted but for me, the highlight of this tremendous achievement is the track that follows the Forgotten Robot when Pazu and Sheeta arrive at Laputa. The track is haunting yet full of hope and keeps qualities of the Laputian themed music that has been featured up this point. In the dub, there were improvements and additional tracks included that elevate the experience even more although the original Japanese is still just as beautiful. The music overall is classic and traditional in style until we get to moments of conflict were synthesizers are included and bring a more fantastical element into the mix. The soundtrack reflects the themes of the film.

castle0434.jpg

Picking a highlight scene is difficult for this film because I find it so captivating throughout but in a situation where I am forced to choose, it would be Pazu and Sheeta’s entry into Laputa. Entering the vortex in their tiny glider, they venture into the eye of the hurricane and are forced to endure heavy thunder and lightning. It’s an exhilarating scene to watch as the traditional scenery is stripped away and makes way for a black background with flashes of purples and white. The audience is taken to a different realm and it is reflected in the quick change in pacing, music and perspective as the glider becomes even smaller among giant lightning strikes. It’s a brilliant scene that is then beautifully contrasted with the sudden break as they float down to Laputa and everything seems back to normal. The angry and defensive nature of the weather is a representation of Laputa hiding itself behind the mask and reputation it has gained as a weapon.

What do you think of Castle in the Sky? Which Ghibli film is your favourite? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Quentin Tarantino: Film Ranking

If you asked a group of people for their favourite living filmmaker, there is a strong chance that a large percentage of them will say the name: Quentin Tarantino. One of the greatest and most original minds to come out of the film industry in the history of film, Tarantino practically defined 90s cinema with his look into the gangster underworld of Los Angeles. His films are known for their strong use of language, gratuitous violence and the iconic writing style that Tarantino brings to his dialogue. The owner of two Best Original Screenplay Oscars (for Pulp Fiction and Django Unchained), he has yet to win a Best Director gong. With the release of this year’s Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, could this be another successful awards season for Tarantino?

Tarantino had always stated that he intended to make 10 features. Counting Kill Bill as one, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood would be his ninth and, therefore, penultimate picture. I thought it would be a great celebration of his work to revisit his films old and new and see how I would stack them up when compared to each other.

Here are the reviews for the films of Quentin Tarantino:

Reservoir Dogs (1992)

Possibly one of the most (if not the most) iconic debuts ever to be delivered by a filmmaker, Reservoir Dogs follows a group of men who are given colour code names such as Mr. Orange and Mr. Brown and their attempt to carry out a diamond heist. A pretty simple plot but the genius of the film comes from Tarantino’s decision to not show the heist itself. What we are presented with is the run-up to the heist and it’s consequences when it goes wrong. Featuring a brilliant cast including Harvey Keitel, Michael Madsen and Tim Roth. My favourite performance comes from Steve Buscemi who plays the fearfully paranoid Mr. Pink. Among the men, Pink is clearly the outsider from the beginning when he refuses to give the waitress a tip. The script may seem simple but it is anything but. There is a rhythm and style that would come to define a Tarantino feature such as extensive allegories and numerous pop culture references. The soundtrack for this film has also become somewhat of a legend in its own right and has become a reference point for a lot of modern filmmakers. Tarantino himself claims that this film is the closest to being a “perfect” film which although I see the argument for, I would say that he has managed to make even better films. It would be a shame to think that his first film was his best.

Pulp Fiction (1994)

If you had to say one film that defines the 1990s, I think the majority of people would say Pulp Fiction. From the iconic poster design, extreme violence and brilliant dialogue, Pulp Fiction catapulted Tarantino to the top of the A list, winning him the Palme d’Or at Cannes Film Festival as well as an Academy Award for Best Original Screenplay. Starring John Travolta and Samuel L. Jackson as suave hitmen Vincent Vega and Jules Winnifield who work for drug lord Marsellus Wallace (Ving Rhames) and his cocaine-addicted wife, Mia (Uma Thurman in her most recognisable role). Pulp Fiction is bigger and better than its predecessor with an even more starry cast, bigger budget and killer direction. Even 25 years on, it is still commonly referenced for its costumes and standout scenes such as Jules’ biblical recitation before blowing the brains out of a man who attempted to double-cross Wallace. It is undoubtedly Jackson who is the shining star of this gangster masterpiece as he brings his trademark attitude. You know you did a great job when the person who beat you to the Oscar says that you should have won. There’s a reason why Pulp Fiction marked the start of the iconic collaborations between Tarantino and Jackson. Their love of action, violence and strong language makes the perfect pairing. Besides every time Jackson is onscreen, my favourite scene is Christopher Walken’s iconic monologue as Captain Koons, an Army veteran who survived the war and is gifting his son, Butch (Chandler Lindauer and Brue Willis playing the younger and older versions, respectively) his prized watch. Only Walken could deliver the monologue with the sincerity and conviction that his does.

Jackie Brown (1997)

Jackie Brown is one of those films that finds itself among the top of people’s favourite Tarantino films or worst. Sadly, it is among the bottom of my list but not because it is a bad film by any means. It is simply because of its nature as an adaptation. When I watch a Tarantino, I want to see the usual quirks in the dialogue which I think isn’t there as much as other films. Following Pam Grier as the titular air stewardess who becomes embroiled in a smuggling scandal, Tarantino relies on a great cast to carry out this complex web and pulls it off which include Samuel L. Jackson with a fantastic haircut. Known for her starring roles in Blaxploitation flicks, Grier herself is amazing and had such a powerful presence onscreen. She doesn’t just give a great performances, she becomes Jackie. It’s one of my favourite performances in the Tarantino catalogue but I just feel that there are elements such as the odd pacing that let the film as a whole down. It would be nice to see Tarantino reunite with Grier on a new project, perhaps his 10th (and supposedly last) feature. The film is grounded in reality a bit more than the others and I think the fact that any director could have made this film is why it ranks low. When I watch a Tarantino film, I want it to be distinctively Tarantino but I don’t get that from this film and as previously stated, I think that comes from the fact that it is an adaptation. The man thrives from his originality and it’s what the audience loves.

Kill Bill: Volume 1 (2003)

I remember watching Kill Bill for the first time and being blown away by the strength of the protagonist. The film follows the vengeful ex-assassin The Bride who seeks revenge on her former colleagues when they kill her wedding rehearsal party on the orders of Bill, the man who runs the group. Kill Bill is intended to be watched as one film but due to running length was divided into two volumes. The first volume is seen as the Eastern installment as The Bride ventures to Japan to face the first assassin O-Ren Oshii (Lucy Liu). There are so many reasons why my love for this film is unequivocal such as the clear appreciation for Japanese cinema and culture, the amazing use of animation within the film and most of all, the wide abundance of fleshed out female characters. This film is known for its extreme violence and high body count but don’t let this put you off. Playing the woman who lost everything, including her unborn baby, Thurman’s performance is undeniably ruthless, unapologetic and emotionally charged to the max. Even though she seems unbreakable and unemotional on the surface but you sense her pain underneath the surface from the opening scene with Vernita Green (Vivica A. Fox). Tarantino uses various elements such as sound mixing and colour giving the film its flamboyance and elevating it beyond realism and into fantasy.

Kill Bill: Volume 2 (2004)

Following on from Vol 1, Kill Bill: Vol 2 takes us back to America where the Bride has the second half of her list left to kill in the form of Bill’s failure of a brother, Budd (Michael Madsen), the merciless Elle Driver (Daryl Hannah) and Bill himself (David Carradine). This installment has a larger focus on the Bride’s background before the massacre took place and her journey to becoming an assassin. I love how both films have become a genre of their own. The body count may be a fraction of its predecessor but it still includes some of the most terrifying scenes in film (insert buried alive segment here) and is captivating in its own way. We see the Bride’s emotional journey and her guard slips as she makes some unexpected discoveries in her quest for blood. I think that together, Kill Bill makes for a fantastic saga and would definitely be among my favourite films of the 21st century so far.

Death Proof (2007)

I know there are some people that wouldn’t put Death Proof in the list due to it being part of a two-part feature titled Grindhouse with fellow director and friend, Robert Rodriguez directing Planet Terror (2007). Death Proof is a Texan action led by Kurt Russell as a stuntman who murders women with his car. The film is split into two parts with one group of women’s fates determined the first half and another group in the second half. Death Proof is often viewed as Tarantino’s worst and it is but it’s not a bad film. It is entertaining and Russell is brilliant as the killer in the “death-proof” car. It’s not as complex as other Tarantino films and doesn’t perhaps have the gumption or wow factor that the others have. That being said, for what it wants to be, it delivers in spades. The soundtrack is great and Rose McGowan and Mary Elizabeth Winstead are great in their roles as Pam and Lee, respectively. It’s pretty great that Tarantino and Rodriguez cast McGowan in a leading role in both films to spite Harvey Weinstein for what he did to her. McGowan shines in both films and it would be great to see her make a return to films in roles as amazing as the Grindhouse duo.

Inglourious Basterds (2009)

The first Tarantino film I watched and boy was it a great pick. Undoubtedly one of the best opening scenes in film history, Tarantino manages to create tension with a glass of milk. The film is a reimagining of Nazi-occupied France during the war with Brad Pitt playing Aldo Raine who leads a group of men known as “The Basterds” who are set on killing Nazis and collecting their scalps. Inglourious Basterds also includes what I would argue is Tarantino’s best character today in the erringly charismatic SS Officer, Hans Landa. Played spectacularly by Christoph Waltz in a role that would see him in his Hollywood breakthrough and take home every Supporting Actor Award including the Cannes Film Festival, BAFTA and the Academy Award. Landa is a character who commands your attention. He’s despicable and manipulative, the sociopathic changes are intriguing to watch such as him loving his nickname “Jew Hunter” in the opening scene when intimidating a local farmer, to despising the name when realising that the Nazis are set on losing the war. His motives and outlook can never be understood because he is such a whirlwind character. He seems to take his job seriously one moment then not at all the next and flits the fate of others with ease, not finding it difficult to kill if he sees fit. I don’t think there’s a character that has unsettled a global audience as much as Hans Landa has and yet you long for him to be on the screen because the character is so engaging. Tarantino’s screenwriting is possibly his best, which he clearly knows from the final frame when Aldo looks into the camera and says “this might be my masterpiece”.

Django Unchained (2012)

Bringing his love for spaghetti westerns to the frontline for this Civil War epic, Tarantino’s 3 hour Django Unchained follows Jamie Foxx as the titular character and his quest to find his wife Broomhilda (Kerry Washington) in the Deep South were slavery is very much a thriving business. With the help of bounty hunter Dr King Schultz (Christoph Waltz), Django’s adventure sees Tarantino using an endless amount of fake blood and a controversial multitude of n-words throughout which faced criticism from individuals such as Spike Lee. I do think this is a film plagued with indulgence and excess in its violence, language and numerous endings but it does have very strong points. The cast are perfect in their roles particularly Christoph Waltz as Schultz and Leonardo DiCaprio as plantation owner Calvin Candie. Waltz is charismatic and charming as a man set on freeing slaves and hunting killers and would go on to win a second Best Supporting Actor gong although I personally think his role is a lead not supporting performance. DiCaprio’s performance on the other side is chilling and captivating as he relishes in torturing the slaves.

The Hateful Eight (2015)

Concluding the western trilogy in Tarantino’s catalogue, we venture to Wyoming in the aftermath of the Civil War. There’s a heavy blizzard and eight murderous brutes are trapped in Minnie’s Haberdashery including the honourable John “The Hangman” Ruth (Kurt Russell), country hunter Major Marquis Warren (Samuel L. Jackson) and a career-best from Jennifer Jason Leigh as the disgustingly brilliant Daisy Domergue who John is bringing to Red Rock to hang. Like all Tarantino films, this one is also a mash-up of genres. It is primarily western but is also murder mystery, comedy and thriller. The film’s composer, Ennio Morricone stated that he wrote the score for a horror film which would end up being the film’s strongest point and leading to Morricone’s long-awaited Oscar. It’s a truly brilliant soundtrack and elevates the rhythm of the dialogue which is so important in the moments of extreme tension. Tarantino’s writing is tight and every character has been fleshed out, admittedly some more than others, but each one is memorable in their own way. It’s an interesting inclusion and the film shows a maturity in Tarantino’s filmmaking. There is violence, granted, as expected but Tarantino is more focused on his script and positioning of characters than the actual violence.

Once Upon a Time in Hollywood (2019)

I have already written an extensive review on this one (which you can read here) so I won’t go into too much detail. What I will say is that it has a very good chance of scoring some nominations and potential wins going into awards season. It’s nice seeing Tarantino returning to California for his penultimate film and it seems like a film that he was destined to make. The personal touches are definitely here in what seems to be a return to the place where he grew up.

So we’re all up to date and I eagerly await to see what Tarantino has up his sleeve for his tenth and supposed final feature. Undoubtedly, it will be one of the biggest events in film history with actors and crew members alike clambering at the chance to work with him. There’s only one Tarantino and there certainly won’t be another director like him again.

With all that said and done, here is my final ranking:

1) Kill Bill: Volume 1 (2003)

2) Inglourious Basterds (2009)

3) Reservoir Dogs (1992)

4) Pulp Fiction (1994)

5) Kill Bill: Volume 2 (2004)

6) Once Upon a Time in Hollywood (2019)

7) The Hateful Eight (2015)

8) Django Unchained (2012)

9) Jackie Brown (1997)

10) Death Proof (2007)

I know it’s probably shocking having Kill Bill: Volume 1 at the top, but there is something incredibly empowering to me seeing a female character leading a blockbuster four hour saga. I hope people refer back to this when people claim that audiences don’t want to see women in film.

Which Tarantino is your favourite? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Paul Thomas Anderson: Film Ranking

Paul Thomas Anderson is known for his experimental and fearless quest into exploring characters in ways that are unflinching and at times, uncomfortable.

With the exception of last place (I really struggle with the age-gap in the relationship), I’ve watched these films multiple times and some of them are among my favourite films of all time.

Here’s my ranking for the filmography of Paul Thomas Anderson:

  1. The Master (2012)
  2. There Will Be Blood (2007)
  3. One Battle After Another (2025)
  4. Boogie Nights (1997)
  5. Phantom Thread (2017)
  6. Magnolia (1999)
  7. Inherent Vice (2014)
  8. Punch-Drunk Love (2002)
  9. Hard Eight (1996)
  10. Licorice Pizza (2021)

Which PTA film is your favourite film? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

The Red Shoes (1948)

This technicolour wonderland is one of the best (if not the best!) film in the history of British cinema. Directed by Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger, It’s become known as a masterpiece and is constantly an inspiration for many artists alike and with good reason. Following Victoria Page (Moira Shearer), a ballerina who joins a troupe as the lead in the new ballet The Red Shoes. She begins to find a conflict between her professional relationship with the insufferable genius, Boris Lermontov (Anton Walbrook) and a personal romantic relationship with the troupe’s composer, Julian Craster (Marius Goring). Soon enough, the ballet of The Red Shoes begins to seep into Victoria’s reality and she is eventually broken down by the idealisations that are expected of her. This is a film that breaks the boundaries of the filmmaking experience. It’s very premise of the ballet within the reality of the film soon becomes blurred and the tone of the film changes from a basic aspirational drama to a psychological thriller. Inspired by the Hans Christian Anderson fairytale but given an original makeover by The Archers (as Powell and Pressburger were collectively known), this film delves into the dark side that fairytales ventured into which is a contrast to the Disney films that were dominating the global market. Even 70 years on, the topics in the film feel just as relevant today.

The Archers’ brilliant direction and script effectively contrast the freedom of dance with the claustrophobia and obsession with perfection. Nothing sums this film up more perfectly than Vicky and Boris’ first exchange:

Lermontov: Why do you want to dance?

Vicky: Why do you want to live?

Lermontov: Well, I don’t know exactly why, er, but I must.

Vicky: That’s my answer too.

red_002after.jpg

Dancing gives Vicky the freedom that she craves but unbeknownst to her in the beginning that the freedom she “gains” from dancing for Lermontov is merely his vision. He is the puppet master pulling the strings. As Vicky grows closer to Julian and begins to finesse her own skills, she begins to resist and she finds herself no longer wanting to dance but unable to rid herself of the red shoes. The ballet sequence in which we see Vicky encapsulate her character and venture into the nightmare world of the dance is horrific. Her own emotions have merged with the character. Her dancing has become her life force. Then there’s the conflict she has between Julian who is an aspiring musician who is working for pennies and has the freedom to create the material he wants and then Lermontov who requires strict control over the whole operation. I think it is to Powell and Pressburger’s credit that they manage to succeed in creating three entirely different yet well-rounded characters who all have their motives and flaws. It’s a film that feels progressive even now and doesn’t belong to a particular time. It’s reluctance to slot into a specific genre is also reflective of this as it is a drama, thriller, horror, dance piece all in one.

I think that Shearer’s performance is one of my favourites in any film. She shines as Vicky and really brings out the talent and the grandeur of the role. Despite her privilege (we first see her sat in a private box watching the ballet), Vicky shows her natural passion and talent which impresses Lermontov who initially dismisses her because of her background. Despite Vicky’s flair for ballet, she is still an outsider as her fellow dancers clearly do not have the luxuries that she has. No scene depicts this better than when she thinks she is going to dinner and is dressed to the nines complete with a tiara, only to find the men running the ballet planning the next production in casual attire. Vicky is by no means a perfect individual either. She throws a tantrum when she is unable to keep up with Julian’s tempo during rehearsal. Vicky and Julian’s relationship develops as they realise that they are two sides of the same coin which Lermontov despises. The complexities of Lermontov’s character makes him one of my favourite “villains” film history. His obsession dehumanises those around him, none more so than prima ballerina, Irina Boronskaya (Ludmilla Tchérina) who is abandoned by Lermontov when she announces her engagement. The people around Lermontov are dehumanised puppets where his ambitions must become their ambitions. The moment there is any hint of a life outside the ballet, they are exonerated and in Lermontov’s eyes, they never even existed. His unapologetic way of life is challenged by Vicky and the climatic scene shows a crack in the façade as he breaks down onstage and forces the production to commence without her. The vision becomes empty and the audience gazes at a moving spotlight as it flutters around the stage where Vicky should be.

irina

The music composed by Brian Easdale is nothing short of extraordinary and it effortlessly dances the line between the ballet production and the film reality until eventually both worlds merge into one. The music used in the production of The Red Shoes is spectacular with the church scene in particular remaining a highlight for me. I get chills every time I watch that segment and hear the constant bell as the lead is abandoned and left to die. Jack Cardiff’s choreography for the film is a perfect marriage for the score and the two sail on through the film and set the pace. These components are representative of Julian and Vicky’s talents and the importance of the part that they play into the film cannot be unrecognised. One of my favourite aspects of the film is Hein Heckroth‘s costumes designs. The moment when Vicky’s costume for the ballet of The Red Shoes is revealed is breathtaking and it’s one of my favourite costumes in film. Not to mention the incredible costumes that Vicky wears throughout and the clothes designed by Carven for Irina are exceptional.

My love for this film grows with every view and even thinking about it now, it’s incredible how much it has shaped my taste in film and been such a huge influence in my creativity. It’s such a beautiful film that deserves more than one watch and I think it should be on every film lover’s watch list if they haven’t already seen it. It truly deserves its masterpiece status and remains an important part of cinema history.

What do you think of The Red Shoes? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

The Lord of the Rings Trilogy (2001-2003)

Continuing on in my Favourite Film series, this post looks at the films that opened my eyes to filmmaking and made me realise my passion for film. Based on the huge novel by J.R.R Tolkien, The Lord of the Rings trilogy consists of Fellowship of the Ring, The Two Towers and The Return of the King and follows Frodo Baggins (Elijah Wood), a respected hobbit who lives with his adventurous Uncle Bilbo (Ian Holm) who is forced to carry the One Ring to Mordor where he must destroy it in the fires of Mount Doom before the evil Lord Sauron claims the Ring and uses it to rule over Middle Earth. Frodo is accompanied by the Fellowship that consist of his best friend, Samwise Gamgee (Sean Astin), fellow hobbits Merry (Dominic Monaghan) and Pippin (Billy Boyd), men Aragorn (Viggo Mortensen) and Boromir (Sean Bean), elf Legolas (Orlando Bloom), dwarf Gimli (John Rhys-Davies) and wizard Gandalf (Ian McKellen), Frodo must resist the lure of the ring and cross Middle Earth in a bid to save mankind from ruin. The trilogy also features a strong supporting cast with Hugo Weaving as elf Lord Elrond, Liv Tyler as his daughter Arwen who is Aragorn’s love interest and Miranda Otto in badass form as Éowyn. I know it seems a bit unfair to cram the whole trilogy in one post but it is impossible not to consider the vast achievement and scope that Peter Jackson has achieved.

It cannot be underestimated how well these films did upon release. The trilogy well surpassed the $1 billion mark and became instantly iconic around the world with masses of people en route to the premieres at their local cinemas. All three won big come award time with Fellowship of the Ring winning four Academy Awards, The Two Towers winning seven and The Return of the King sweeping the board with eleven nominations and eleven wins, tying with Ben-Hur (1959) and Titanic (1997) for the most wins at the Oscars. All three were critical and commercial smashes and boasted a spectacle despite being a film with fairly indie roots. It was different from other mainstream films because of this and I think the story’s message of fighting for good and friendship is one that resonates with a lot of people.

The cinematic releases see the films lengths at a minimum of 150 minutes per film but the extended editions bring the total running time an amazing 12 hours and what a 12 hours it is. The film achieved critical and commercial success upon release, has dated extremely well and remains one of the best loved franchises in history. Everything about it is perfect to me. I think it is a brilliant adaptation of the books and think the changes and omissions that were made were completely justified for the big screen. I know some people have trouble with the multiple endings at the end of the third film but remember that it is the end of one extremely long epic and that the ends need to be tied nicely. I think it’s a credit to the brilliant screenplays written by Jackson, Fran Walsh and Philippa Boyens that each member of the Fellowship is loved and has their own story. The films are so spectacular and huge that it becomes an immersive experience for the viewer. Jackson contrasts this with moments charged with emotion such as Sam’s speech at the end of The Two Towers which gives the film its heart and separates it from other blockbuster films that have come before it. I couldn’t tell you how many times I have watched these films and I am still noticing new things every time. It’s such a rewarding experience to watch these films and I think Jackson’s direction captures the imagination that Tolkien gives in the novels perfectly.

Sam

The film is cast brilliantly. There are three main storylines when the Fellowship splits with one following Frodo and Sam, another following Merry and Pippin and the third following Aragorn, Legolas and Gimli. Each actor embodies their character personally, particularly Mortensen and McKellen as Aragorn and Gandalf, respectively. Aragorn’s transition from outlaw Strider to the King is amazing as we see him emerge from the shadows and take the lead in the Battle of Helm’s Deep in The Two Towers (I will be discussing Helm’s Deep in further detail soon). On the other hand, we see Gandalf undergo a physical transformation as we shifts from being Gandalf the Grey to Gandalf the White, giving him even stronger powers. Frodo’s development from a hobbit who has never left the Shire to crossing lands and encountering creatures that he would never have seen before. Much like his Uncle Bilbo, Frodo’s sense of what is right helps to combat his fears but his morality is tested when the manipulative Gollum (Andy Serkis) “assists” in helping him reach Mordor. The rapport between the cast offscreen is reflected onscreen and makes for great viewing in scenes such as the Fellowship’s inception and the scenes when they are forced to split up. The intensity of the Fellowship’s bond is so strong and the direction is so intricate that the audience feels as though they are going on the same journey. When watching the climactic scene of The Return of the King unfold, you can’t help but feel relieved when everything is over.

One of the aspects that also makes these films so spectacular are the special effects which are provided by WETA. Led by the amazing Richard Taylor, CGI is only used when an effect is humanly impossible. The behind-the-scenes on the extended editions are fantastic and well worth watching as we watch the creation of Middle Earth unfold. Richard Taylor is the best of the best when it comes to special effects (his multiple Oscars reflect this) and his team are super brilliant and creative. From the intricate details in the designs and the make-up, every single aspect of the film is thought out and executed beautifully. Taylor and his team tie together the make-up, the props and the special effects together that enhances the fantastical elements in the film. Even the effort that goes into collecting short sounds for sound editing and mixing and the process behind it is remarkable to watch. Seeing the passion and the heart that the crew put into the film is touching as everyone has a respect for each other no matter what job they do. Howard Shore’s score for the trilogy is also something that seems revolutionary and new in film. Somehow, he captures the tone perfectly and created that perfect violin solo for “History of the Ring” that is instantly synonymous with the film itself. My favourite piece in the trilogy is “Riders of Rohan” from The Two Towers because it captures that anticipation for battle perfectly and grandeur of marching. The use of delicate strings contrasting with a strong brass sound helps to elevate the film to its epic heights. Shore is one of the best film composers out there and he knocks it out of the park with these scores.

helmsdeep

I don’t think I could justify discussing these films in length and not bring up the brilliance in structure and execution of the major battle scenes. Helm’s Deep in The Two Towers is probably the best battle in film history. Everything about it is remarkable from the set design to the intricate detailing in the costumes and props and then the performances are on top form to boot. It comes at a point in the story where Sauron has managed to accumulate a large 100,000 strong Orc army thanks to the evil Wizard, Saruman (Christopher Lee). The odds are stacked against the soldiers of Rohan but they still vow to battle until the very end. The arrival of the elves from Lothlórien, led by Haldir (Craig Parker), marks a significant shift in the Middle Earth universe as elves infamously refuse to involve themselves in war but the threat of darkness forces them to fight alongside. It makes for an epic battle and one of the most devastating deaths in the trilogy as Haldir meets his end defending Aragorn. Other scenes that are remarkable include Boromir’s death in Fellowship of the Ring which I remember being the first death that I encountered in film and being perplexed that a “good guy” could die in a film. The great thing about The Lord of the Rings trilogy is that it does not patronise the audience but it is suitable for all audiences (maybe not smaller children but from around 6/7 upwards). Even the ending is bittersweet as Frodo sails off for the Undying Lands, leaving the others forever. It isn’t afraid to delve into serious topics while remaining in that fantasy universe and being larger than life.

I would be lying if I said that these films didn’t change my life and my outlook on film. I watch the extended editions every few months and fall in love more and more. There is a strong argument that they are among the greatest films in history and deserve their place one of the most renowned series for its depth and scope. I remember seeing them for the first time in the cinema and being scared and in awe at the same time. I was so captivated that I would watch them on a loop for months on end. It’s amazing to think that these films were such a huge part of my childhood but they are so important to me and I’ll never stop loving them.

What do you think of the The Lord of the Rings? Which installment is your favourite? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Scanners (1981)

Another film that I watched on a whim on BFI player is one that has been on my list for years. Scanners is a sci-fi horror directed and written by David Cronenberg and follows a sub-species of humans called Scanners, people who can control others with their minds. When one Scanner, Daryl Revok (Michael Ironside), goes rogue and starts to hunt down other Scanners in order to take over the world, security system corporation Consec uses social outcast, Cameron Vale (Stephen Lack), to infiltrate the community to bring Revok down. Assisted by the allusive Dr Paul Ruth (Patrick McGoohan), Cameron must hone his powers in order to face Daryl whose powers are much stronger than the other Scanners. He teams up with the powerful Kim (Jennifer O’Neill) and they work together to bring Daryl down.

The plot itself is linear as Cameron goes from social outcast to leading the fight against Daryl. We see him come out of his shell and become stronger than the Scanners until he is strong enough to fight Daryl. The climactic scene between them is fantastic and unexpected. Relying on the actors’ physicality and strong use of gory special effects, the scene is larger than life but also extremely simple due to its setting and the focus on the actors. Cronenberg knows that he doesn’t have to go above and beyond to create an effective fight scene and therefore brings no distractions. The focus on facial expressions also adds to the intensity of the film. I personally like that the film throws you into the situation and we are introduced to the world of Scanners through Cameron’s own realisation and experience.

The most iconic scene in this film is definitely the head explosion where we first meet Daryl in which he violently kills a fellow Scanner by causing his head to explode. Very few scenes in films make me jump and this one truly did. The brilliance of the physicality of the Scanning process is highly intense and the build-up in this scene had me on edge the entire time. I also think that the character of Daryl is one of the films highlights for me. He is an interesting character who was clearly distressed and reactive to the environment around him. He is relentless in his quest for world domination, even attempting and succeeding to violently kill other Scanners in order to do so. This contrasts with Cameron who is hugely reluctant to join his cause and has no inner conflict to do so. The two Scanners are polar opposites on the sides of bad and good.

MV5BMjMyYmIyYmEtM2JlNy00ZjQ0LWFhZGItZGViODliZmNlZGIyXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNjUxMjc1OTM@._V1_.jpg

I really like the style of the film. It’s sci-fi but doesn’t feel like it due to its realistic setting. The Scanners themselves look like regular humans and the Scanning effect is very physical and relies on the actors rather than the special effects which are bring the results. The special effects are one of the strong points and are brilliantly gory. It is not a film for the faint of heart. There are exploding heads, charred bodies and plenty of guts throughout. Even the scenes that don’t have gore are full of horror as we see the affect that the Scanners have on other humans. It doesn’t feel like a horror in the traditional sense, however, because of its sci-fi aspects so it’s a film that sits in its own genre.

Cronenberg’s long time collaborator Howard Shore provides a score that really brings the film to life. The Scanning process is enhanced by Shore’s score with it’s use of futurstic sounds and abnormal tones. Being an avid fan of Peter Jackson’s The Lord of the Rings Trilogy (2001-2003), one of my favourite aspects is Shore’s revolutionary score so listening to this soundtrack made me realise what a great talent he is. He captures the tone and unease of the film perfectly that it seems that the film is shaped by the score at times, particularly those intense scenes when the Scanning is reaching the climactic point.

Overall, Scanners is a film that brings special effects in abundance but also asks a lot of its actors and the result is a great film that revolutionised the horror genre. It’s a film that showcases Cronenberg’s brilliant mind and imagination and his reluctance to follow trends and put himself in a box.

What do you think of Scanners? Let me know in the comments below!