Categories
Uncategorised

I’m Thinking of Ending Things (2020)

One of the most anticipated films of 2020 comes in the form of this psychological horror from the genius that is Charlie Kaufman. I’m Thinking of Ending Things is based on the 2016 novel of the same name by Iain Reid with Kaufman adapting the screenplay and directing. Oscar-winning writer enlists Jessie Buckley and Jesse Plemons as the film’s leads following Buckley as a Young Woman who is hesitant with her new boyfriend, Jake (Plemons). In true Kaufman fashion, the dialogue is complex and layered as the Young Woman’s open voice over is interwoven into the discussions that she partakes in as though the other characters can hear her thoughts. The film takes place during a visit the Young Woman and Jake take to the latter’s parents and the impending mental breakdown that ensues when they are all trapped due to a snowstorm.

Jessie Buckley is brilliant as expected. Proving herself to be a true rising star in the acting game thanks to her turns in Beast (2017), Wild Rose (2018) and the TV drama Chernobyl (2019), Buckley shows off a flawless American accent as the Young Woman who descends into madness as she loses her grip on what she wants and what she should do with her life. Opposite Buckley is Jesse Plemons who has rapidly risen in the acting ranks in recent years. Known to most for his turn on the final season of Breaking Bad (2008-2013), Plemons has built a fantastic portfolio starring in films like The Master (2012) and Vice (2018). It’s refreshing to see both actors lead in a film that is reliant on their performances. The rapport between them is credit to the perfect casting and their ability to bounce off each other naturally despite the complexity of the writing.

In the supporting roles we have Toni Collette and David Thewlis as Jake’s parents who unsurprisingly bring phenomenal performances. Jake’s Mother is aloof and eccentric contrasted with his Father who is opinionated and direct. The casting again is top notch as it is great to see two relative newcomers and two acting veterans bouncing off one another and building onto the tension up to breaking point. Collette is flying high on a streak of brilliant roles she has taken in recent years including her lead performance in Ari Aster’s 2018 hit Hereditary and it’s nice to see Thewlis working with Kaufman again after playing the lead in the 2015 animated masterpiece, Anomalisa.

The dinner scene in which the new couple and the parents break the ice and get to know each other. What Kaufman has always been brilliant at is fleshing out his characters to a point where you know them but at the same time you don’t know everything about them. The characters cannot be fully trusted but because Kaufman writes it this way. These extra dimensions and layers allow the plot to naturally unravel. The film is directed from the Young Woman’s perspective so as she begins to doubt everything that happens, so does the audience. Its depiction of mental and emotional breakdown starts subtle but soon enough, the audience is thrust into a confusing narrative where stories change, the ages of characters change and even the protagonist’s name changes. The audience doesn’t truly know who the Young Woman is and so she could be any of these woman; a scholar, a waitress or an artist but her inner conflict in who she is and what she wants means that the uncertainties that unfold in Jake’s parents’ household are not as peculiar as it may seem.

Another unspoken aspect that is worth mentioning is the brilliant decision made to cut out music from the majority of it so the natural soundscapes provide the background noise. The opening piece composed by Jay Wadley is wonderfully intense underlying the horror aspects of the film as the Young Woman talks about her relationship and her outlook on life as a whole. The ballet sequence later in the film is driven by the musical narrative that Wadley composes and complimented the dancing perfectly.

Kaufman has knocked it out of the park again with his strong direction and distinctive writing and insight into the human condition. I’m Thinking of Ending Things is available on Netflix and I would definitely recommend giving it a watch. The ups and downs of the relationship is reminiscent of Kaufman’s screenplay for the 2004 film Enternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind while still remaining original and developing its own DNA. I wouldn’t be surprised to see I’m Thinking of Ending Things in discussion when it comes to awards season. Thrilling and indulgent, it is a film that demands to be watched more than once.
Have you seen I’m Thinking of Ending Things yet? Let me know what you think in the comments below!
Categories
Uncategorised

You Were Never Really Here (2017)

Lynne Ramsay’s You Were Never Really Here follows hitman Joe who specialises in retrieving young girls from the clutches of underground paedophiles and trafficking. He is tasked by a New York senator to retrieve his daughter, Nina (Ekaterina Samsonov), who has been kidnapped and to eliminate those who took her by the most violent means possible. The film premiered in the main competition at Cannes FIlm Festival in 2017 where it became one of the most widely discussed films and won two awards for Best Screenplay for Ramsay and Best Actor for Phoenix. It’s rare to see a film win more than one award at Cannes so the hype for the film was huge. From the offset, the film doesn’t hold back in its themes and violence.

The direction is executed with a cat and mouse feel. The camera trailing through Joe’s eyes as he hunts for the perpetrators and their accomplices. What Ramsay does so well is being able to use the protagonist’s perspective as the audience’s entry into the film. Even in scenes when Joe is doing menial tasks like cleaning or singing with his elderly mother, we get a glimpse into the two different lives he has. Ramsay’s screenplay is incredible and tight, managing to create a fully realised character in its 90 minute runtime. The screenplay is written around the character of Joe and the outside context such as politics is only touched on lightly when introduced to joe in an organic way. Despite using multiple locations, the film still has that claustophobic tone throughout. Like previous films by Ramsay, the film heavily relies on its imagery rather than dialogue to tell the story. This works particularly well for You Were Never Really Here as a lot of the scenes only contain Joe and so scenes filled with dialogue would result in an unnatural and jarring experience. 

Phoenix’s performance as anticipated is more than deserving of the praise received. Joe is unapologetically violent, trauamtised from childhood and yet he displays affection, especially towards his mother and Nina. Joe’s troubled state of mind is displayed from the beginning as we see him self-suffocating with a plastic bag in order to cope with the flashbacks and trauma in his life. Throughout the film, Ramsay gives us brief glimpses into Joe’s backstory but doesn’t overdo it in a way that the film is anchored down by it. Phoenix’s performance is subtly expressive and he allows himself to go to a place that is uncomfortable and disconcerting, resulting in a character that is highly unpredictable and yet so commanding of the audience’s attention. In my previous post where I discuss my top 5 performances by Phoenix (which you can read here), I have included You Were Never Really Here because I think it is one of the prime examples where the actor truly emcompasses everything about the character.For the score, Ramsay recruits Jonny Greenwood for the second time after her 2011 film We Need to Talk About Kevin. Like Joe’s character, the score flits between intense pieces with a strong and consistent beat which are usually played when he is on the job and more natural and flowing pieces which provide a backing track for scenes with Nina and his mother. The track, “Tree Strings”, which is played as Joe buries his mother is such a poignant moment and the music elevates the scene by assisting in his ephiphany to rescue Nina from her kidnappers. Greenwood is more widely known for his collaborations with Paul Thomas Anderson but his scores for both We Need to Talk About Kevin and You Were Never Really Here assist in elevating and excuting Ramsay’s vision to perfection.

Ramsay is one of the best female directors working in the industry today. She consistently brings out performances that are career-defining such as Phoenix in You Were Never Really Here and Tilda Swinton in We Need to Talk About Kevin. She has a clear vision and isn’t afraid to delve into any topic, particularly those centred around children. The ending to You Were Never Really Here isn’t the all-rounded happy ending you would want from a film that explores child sex trafficking, but Ramsay’s choice to give it the ending that it does have highlights the reality that these children face. Ramsay’s ability to write strong characters is in another league. Her characters aren’t particularly likeable but that doesn’t matter. The characters are the driving force of the film and the fact that they aren’t completely relatable or likeable only serves to add another layer of depth. I think because of this that this makes You Were Never Really Here an outstanding inclusion in Ramsay’s filmography and why it was so successful upon release.

What do you think of You Were Never Really Here? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Director Ranking Spotlight

Jordan Peele: Film Ranking

When it comes to the best horror visionaries of the 21st century, it is most likely that Jordan Peele’s name will crop up. He rose to fame for his comedic acting alongside Keegan-Michael Key in the hit shows Mad TV and Key & Peele and the two are still often cast together such as their voice work in last year’s Toy Story 4.

Aside from being a comedian, Peele is also an avid horror film fan and turned his attention to writing and directing horror films that have redefined the genre in recent years. He has experienced resounding successes both critically and commercially, which is fantastic for a rising voice in the horror genre especially. His films are original and topical, using the horror genre to explore the African American experience in modern-day America.

A four-time Oscar nominee, Peele is one of a few who has been nominated for Best Picture, Best Director and Best Original Screenplay for his debut, winning the latter for 2017’s stellar Get Out. He has received an additional Best Picture nomination for his contribution as Producer for Spike Lee’s incredible BlacKkKlansman (2018). Peele is on course to become a master of the horror genre and it’s exciting to see what films he creates next.

Get Out (2017)

Peele’s directorial debut was a game-changer in many ways. The hype for this film spread like wildfire and it soon became one of the most critical and commercial successes of 2017. Following African-American photographer Chris (Daniel Kaluuya) who sets off with his white girlfriend, Rose (Allison Williams) to meet her family over the weekend which gradually shifts from a nervous first encounter to a nightmare beyond belief. Peele flips the horror genre on its head with Get Out. Horror films in general tend to exaggerate racial stereotypes a lot more than other genres but what Peele absolutely rejects this and gives us an array of characters who are well-rounded with their own background stories and motives thanks to the incredible script. The film is filled with so many layers that you can notice something different every time you watch the film. From the brilliant supporting performances from Lakeith Stanfield and Lil Rel Howery to Michael Abels’ impeccable score. What sets it apart from other horrors is that the villains are white middle-class liberals whereas a lot of racism in horror is at the hands of the right-wing. The film was nominated for a slew of awards including nominations for Academy Awards for Best Picture, Best Director and Best Actor in a Leading Role for Kaluuya, winning Peele the Oscar for Best Original Screenplay in a year that was incredibly strong in competition. Get Out is only 3 years old and yet has already solidified itself as a horror classic and will certainly be marked as a milestone for the genre.

Us (2019)

Peele’s follow up is another demonstration of his talent as a skilled writer and director. Starring Oscar winner Lupita Nyongo’o as Adelaide, a woman who is haunted by a traumatic encounter she experienced as a child, and her family as they go on vacation. Aside from a couple of weird coincidences, everything seems to be going okay until the family are confronted by a family of doppelgangers who attempt to kill their counterparts. Us is a highly intense film filled with puzzle pieces that are eventually placed together. It is a joy to watch and Nyongo’o’s performance particularly is a knockout. To simply compare this film to Get Out would be ridiculous because they are so different in tone. Again, Michael Abels’ score is absolutely brilliant with its classical elements to reflect Adelaide’s ballet background. Gifted with four times the budget Get Out had, Peele takes advtange using multiple locations and the cast as expected is flawless with Winston Duke playing Adelaide’s husband, Gabe and Elisabeth Moss as family friend, Kitty leading the supporting cast. It’s a shame that this film wasn’t included in the awards circuit, especially for Peele’s screenplay and Nyongo’o’s spectacular performance.

Thanks to his genius and contribution, Peele has helped horror become the best genre to explore topical issues. He is clearly inspired and admires horror films but isn’t afraid to reject the stereotypes and add his own voice to the mix. It’s incredible to think how much Peele has achieved in the space of a few years and only serves for further excitement as to what projects he works on next, including as screenwriter and producer for the upcoming Candyman.

What do you think of Jordan Peele’s films? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Hayao Miyazaki: Film Ranking

It’s hard not to think about Hayao Miyazaki when choosing what anime film to watch. Known as one of the founders of the Japanese animation powerhouse Studio Ghibli, Miyazaki has established a name among critics and audiences alike as an important figure in helping Japanese cinema reach a global audience with films that are suitable for all ages. So far, Studio Ghibli has only won one film in the Best Animated Feature category which is for Miyazaki’s masterpiece Spirited Away (2001) which, in my opinion, remains the best overall winner in this category. I do think there are times when a Ghibli production should have walked away with the award but sadly, releases directly from Disney Studios tend to dominate the category almost every year.

Ghibli is reliable and consistent, bringing out films that challenge our perceptions on the society we live in by incorporating more mature issues such as loss, mankind’s treatment of nature and identity. There are other directors who have also helped to bring Ghibli the reputation it has today such as Isao Takahata who I will also be writing a separate ranking for but in the meantime, let’s delve into the films of the one and only Hayao Miyazaki.

Here is a mini write up for each in chronological order followed by my ranking at the end of the article:

The Castle of Cagliostro (1979)

Miyazaki’s debut comes in the form of this action packed adventure based on the Lupin III manga series following thief Lupin and his partner Jigen after they successfully rob the Monte Carlo Casino only to find that the money is counterfeit. They travel to Cagliostro, the rumoured source of the counterfeit enterprise in a bid to put an end to the ordeal. The film is credited with being an inspiration to the likes of Raiders of the Lost Ark and The Great Mouse Detective. It’s clearly not completely controlled by Miyazaki himself as it was made before Ghibli’s inception but there are some signature Miyazaki traits that are noticable in hindsight such as the exaggerated expressions and the mix of humour and drama. It’s a faster-paced film than the usual Miyazaki action films but it doesn’t feel rushed. Lupin is a great character and the writing ensures the audience is gripped. Another highlight in this film is the score by Yuji Ohno which has Pink Panther vibes and really helps to elevate the film-watching experience. I think that this film marks a very strong start to what was evidently the beginning of one of the most exciting film careers in Japanese cinema history.

Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind (1984)

The first film created by the founders of Studio Ghibli comes in the form of this brilliant dystopic epic set in a world where the Toxic Jungle, a forest filled with giant, poisonous insects threatens to eliminate the last of the human race. Though released before Ghibli was officially founded, Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind is commonly considered a Ghibli and has been re-released under the Ghibli banner. The film follows the titular character as she strives to find a way for the insects and humans to co-exist. Based on the manga series of the same name by Miyazaki, who also adapted it into a screenplay, Nausicaä isn’t afraid to delve into deep issues and question its younger audience. Focusing on the themes of mankind vs nature which would prove to be an underlying topic in subsequent Miyazaki features, the film is also unafraid to showcase loss and fractured relationships. It’s also refreshing to see a female protagonist whose strength is never questioned and is accepted for what it is, another trait that Miyazaki showcases in each of his Ghibli produced films.

Castle in the Sky (1986)

The first official feature to be released under the Studio Ghibli is the action-adventure Castle in the Sky. The film follows Pazu, a young boy who works in the mine of his local village who comes across a girl, Sheeta, who floats down from the sky. They are soon chased by pirates and government agents in a bid to track down the secret locating the mysterious floating island, Laputa, that Sheeta may hold the key to find. I have written a fuller review on this film that you can read here but it is truly a dazzling achievement. The scope and detail in the animation is remarkable and the score by Joe Hisaishi feels timeless. Although it is not as popular as Miyazaki’s later films, I think that Castle in the Sky is such a thrilling and impactful film that has a lot to say on mankind’s relationship with nature, the importance of the environment and people’s relationships with each other. Both protagonists work together to find a peaceful solution against the people who want to use Laputa and its materials for weaponary and world domination.

My Neighbor Totoro (1988)

Arguably the most iconic Studio Ghibli film, My Neighbor Totoro follows sisters Mei and Satsuki as they move into an old house with their father so they can be closer to their mother who is recovering in hospital from a long-term illness. The two girls eventually encounter an array of spirits, including one that lives in the nearby forest who Mei names Totoro and the enigmatic Catbus that provides transport for the spirits. It’s a wonderful film that provides the perfect introduction for younger children to Studio Ghibli. Unlike its predecessors, My Neighbor Totoro is a lot more innocent and childlike in its design and message. This doesn’t prevent it from being a brilliant film, however, as it does a great job on touching on family dynamics, childhood and loss. It has a lighter feel and very striking design, particularly the Catbus who conveys the tone of the film without even saying anything. What is brilliant about Miyazaki’s world is how he integrates traditional Japanese folklore with his own imagination and artistry and My Neighbor Totoro is a beautiful example of this.

Kiki’s Delivery Service (1989)

Following on his successful streak, Miyazaki brings another film geared towards younger children in this lovely tale about a younger witch, Kiki, who sets off to find out what she wants to do with her life. Accompanied by her cat Jiji, Kiki is fascinated by the normal human world and understandably finds it hard to fit in as she is not like them. The film is all about understanding accepting our differences and how we can use them to the our advantage. Kiki is a great protagonist for the younger demographic as she is a strong female who is flawed but she works on those flaws. She is a well-rounded character and it showcases Miyazaki’s strength in being able to create characters that audiences of all age can relate to on some level. It’s not the strongest installment in Miyazaki’s filmography but that doesn’t mean it is a bad film at all. Miyazaki’s work is of such high calibre that it just misses out on the top tier of films for me but it is still an absolute joy to watch.

Porco Rosso (1992)

The last film Miyazaki to be made before he took his first hiatus is a more detailed look into the filmmakers interest with aircraft. Porco Rosso follows the titular character who was a human but was cursed and is now a pig who works as a pilot bounty hunter who catches pirates in the Adriatic Sea. It’s a fun-filled adventure that has inklings of Castle in the Sky with the over the top pirates and allows Miyazaki to go deep on his own family heritage of working in aircraft. Joe Hisaishi’s score is fantastic as always and strikes the right upbeat tone that the film has. For me the film’s highlight comes in the scene in which Rosso sees his dead friends flying in the sky in his own version of heaven. It’s a fantastic scene that lifts the whole standard of the film. It is my least favourite Miyazaki film as it does have some flaws that I cannot overlook particularly the treatment of Fio, a teenage woman who aspires to engineer and make planes. A few jokes and quips made by the pirates are thrown her way that I feel are inappropriate for the younger audience. Fio herself is strongly written and is a brilliantly resilient young woman who is unfazed by working in a strongly male-dominated industry but the comments made by other characters could have been removed and still maintain the toxic masculine environment that Miyazaki was wanting to portray.

Princess Mononoke (1997)

Miyazaki returned after 5 years to make this brilliant epic based on traditional Japanese folklore and spirits. Princess Mononoke is fable on mankind’s takeover of nature and the subsequent consequences that this has. Following Eastern Prince Ashitaka who is cursed by a giant boar god who he kills, he must venture West to Irontown, a place filled with revolutionary industrial technology that threatens to takeover the forest by mining the sources underground. On arrival, he comes across San, a human girl raised by the Wolf gods who violently attacks and attempts to kill the leader of Irontown, Lady Eboshi, any chance she can. The film is by far Miyazaki’s most violent and graphic film thanks to its abundance of blood and graphic injury from the offset. Miyazaki always has a large scope in his imagination but Princess Mononoke has such a richness in detail that I think brings it to another tier. From the larger than life forest spirits to Joe Hisaishi’s spectacular score which is my favourite soundtrack from any Studio Ghibli film. I have written a longer review that you can read here. Despite its Medieval Japanese setting, there is a timelessness in the message that Miyazaki it wanting to convey and I think that that is why it resonates with so many people.

Spirited Away (2001)

The film that finally gave Miyazaki a long-awaited Oscar, Spirited Away is usaully the go-to film that beginners to Ghibli go for and with good reason. Following Chihiro, a young girl forced to move away with her parents and is sad to leave her friends, Spirited Away sees the family accidentally trespass on the land of the spirits. After her parents are turned into pigs, Chihiro must work in the Bathhouse while she figures out a way to get her parents back and return home. This film is nothing short of a masterpiece between the wide array of memorable characters as we venture in the spirit world including Haku, a young man who befriends Chihiro and No-Face, a mysterious spirit who suddenly appears and causes mayhem. Everything about it is iconic and it really is a beautiful film to watch. I have done a longer review which you can read here but words really don’t do this film justice.

Howl’s Moving Castle (2004)

Probably the most accessible Miyazaki film storywise, Howl’s Moving Castle is based on the best-selling book by Diana Wynn Jones and follows SOphie, a young woman discontent with her appearance who is cursed by the Witch of the Waste and turned into an old woman. She is then picked up by the mysterious Moving Castle and agrees to work as a cleaning lady for wizard Howl. The film is gloriously magical and is filled with whimiscal design which has made it a favourite amongst fans. The Wales-inspired landscapes are beautiful and vast and some maintain a very high level of detail that remains captivating long after the first viewing. This world that Sophie lives in differs to that of Howl, who longs for beauty and perfection in a world ridden with darkness and chaos. He refuses to take part in the war that is tearing the country apart and provides a bleak backdrop to the natural beauty where the story takes place. Hisaishi’s score is wonderful as always with the main theme waltz reminiscent of a merry-go-round piece. What Miyazaki does so well that he incorporates into this film particularly is showing how blurred the lines are between good and evil.

Ponyo (2008)

After his second hiatus, Miyazaki returns with another film geared towards the younger audience that follows Brunhilde, a goldfish who lives in the sea with her father and sisters, who escapes and is captured in a glass jar by a young human boy called Sōsuke. Brunhilde develops a desire to become human and changes her name to Ponyo after she is accidentally fed blood after Sōsuke shatters the jar which cuts him. Based on The Little Mermaid by Hans Christian Anderson, Ponyo is a less traditional retelling of the fairytale but still maintains Miyazaki’s vision and charm irregardless. It is an adorable film about friendship and love and despite there being hints towards a negative shift in the balance of nature due to Ponyo’s wishes, it still remains upbeat. Despite her young age, Ponyo is a strong-willed character who knows that she is out of place at the start but doesn’t understand why and makes it her mission to discover where she belongs.

The Wind Rises (2013)

The lastest Miyazaki feature to be released is absolutely astounding and comes in the form of The Wind Rises, which follows protagonist Jiro Horikoshi, an aircraft designer who works for Mitsubishi during World War II. Based on the manga by Miyazaki, it clearly is a project that the director is passionate about and I think this is emphasised by his realistic approach and design. The film tells the story of an aspiring pilot who eventually becomes an aircraft designer due to his poor eyesight and shows him falling in love with a young woman he meets. The Wind Rises is absolutely beautiful and everything about it from its writing and character design to the score by Hisaishi is flawless. Like most of the other Studio Ghibli films released since the inception of the Best Animated feature Award at the Oscars, this was nominated and it expectedly lost to Frozen but I personally would have given my note to this film because the passion that is conveyed goes beyond Miyazaki’s previous projects.

Unlike a lot of directors, there aren’t as many films that Miyazaki has directed in his 40 year career but that is because creating his films is time-consuming due to his insistence that they stick to hand-drawing their images. In the last 3 years, only 36 minutes have been created for his next feature How Do You Live? which Miyazaki has advised is his last film before retiring for the third (or fourth?) time. The calibre of his films is so high so even the ones that rank a bit lower are so strong in quality. Miyazaki has a reputation that many film-makers and lovers dream of and I have seen these films multiple times and will undoubtedly watch them again and again.

Anywho, here is my final ranking:

1) Castle in the Sky (1986)

2) The Wind Rises (2013)

3) Princess Mononoke (1997)

4) Spirited Away (2001)

5) Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind (1984)

6) Howl’s Moving Castle (2004)

7) Ponyo (2010)

8) My Neighbor Totoro (1988)

9) The Castle of Cagliostro (1979)

10) Kiki’s Delivery Service (1989)

11) Porco Rosso (1992)

So there we have it! What do you think of my list? Which Miyazaki film is your favourite? Let me know in the comments below!

 

Categories
Uncategorised

The Lighthouse (2019)

Robert Eggers’ follow-up to 2015’s The VVitch is a mind-bending mesh of chaos, insanity and broken masculinity. Starring Robert Pattinson and Willem Dafoe as two lighthouse keepers who are stranded on the island after a storm hits, The Lighthouse shows the men’s mentality break and crumble in a fashion never before seen on film. Co-written by Eggers and his brother Max Eggers and inspired by the unfinished short story “The Light-House” by Edgar Allan Poe, The Lighthouse is a brilliant look into madness and mayhem from the outset as the protagonists drink themselves into oblivion when a storm hits. Distributed by the illustrious A24, the film has become instantly iconic for it’s beautiful cinematography, brilliant screenplay and magnetic performances. It is a film that commands attention from the outset and despite it’s simple plot, it is sublimely complex and groundbreaking. Eggers has proven yet again that he is a filmmaker to watch. More like his contemporary Ari Aster (Hereditary and Midsommar), Eggers is bringing a new perspective on the horror genre. His films are not afraid to be gory and disgusting in a different way while also bringing in dark humour and aspects of magic realism. Incorporating sea folk such as mermaids and sea monsters in a space where they are clearly fantasy to begin with but slowly slip into the reality and getting to the point where their existence could be argued.

Robert Pattinson proves that he is on a promising streak of strong performances following his stellar turn in Claire Denis’ erotic sci-fi High Life (you can read my review here). Pattinson plays Ephraim Winslow, a newbie to the lighthouse keeping game who is put to strenuous tasks by the elder Thomas Wake. When he finds a mermaid ornament hidden in his mattress, Winslow becomes fascinated by the eroticism that the sea has and becomes sexually obsessed to the point where his fantasies and realities collide. Even he doesn’t know what is real by the end of the film. The events in the film act as an awakening for Winslow as well as proving to be his demise. He’s a character who never feels settled and is clearly out of place in the job. His inability to understand why what they do is important and Wake’s reluctance to allow him to see the light actually prove to be motivators for Winslow as he doesn’t allow the job to overwhelm him. Pattinson’s character is manic, quiet and calculating at the same time and I think this film is solid proof of how far he has come from his Twilight days. Considering he found fame in a mainstream franchise and will be starring as the titular character in the new Batman film, I think starring in indie films like The Lighthouse shows Pattinson’s passion and his desire for good characterisation and artistic growth.

Williem Dafoe and Robert Pattinson in director Robert Eggers THE LIGHTHOUSE.

Willem Dafoe gives a flawless performance as is expected. Undoubtedly one of the best working actors today, Dafoe’s portrayal of the elderly Thomas Wake is a revelation. He is boisterous and unafraid to stand his ground, having no trouble delegating all the hard work to his companion. At the same time, there are many moments when Wake will change his stories and claim that the stories haven’t changed at all. It’s a role that requires fearlessness which is something that Dafoe has in spades. Known for his controversial roles and ability to play any character to perfection, Dafoe manages to reach yet another career best which is amazing considering the performances he has pulled off the past few years, particularly his turn in The Florida Project. What differs with his performance in The Lighthouse, however, is that this role feels more fantastical and removed to how we usually see Dafoe and the result is immense. I firmly believe that he was deserving of Supporting Actor nominations through awards season but it wasn’t to be as The Lighthouse was shut out from most categories. I think what Dafoe does brilliantly is challenging himself and showing time and time again just how much range he has as a performer. Wake is a despicable man who takes advantage of his protegee and yet he is captivating, incomprehensible and misunderstood.

The score by Mark Korven marks his second collaboration with Eggers after providing the eerily fantastic music for The VVitch. Created in a similar vein to the aforementioned, the score for The Lighthouse is clearly inspired by old maritime songs and merged with traditional horror tones. The result is a suspense filled mesh of mayhem that stands out clearly against the black and white backdrop of the film. It feels timeless and yet not suited for any time with its standoffish tone. There are many jarring string pieces that are like the tempting siren but then contrasting with the stormy surrounding and building tension as the relationship between the protagonists becomes more unbearable. Looking back, this has been a fantastic year for movie scores and even among all the best soundtracks, The Lighthouse proves to be equally simple yet effective, heightening the viewing experience.

lighthouse2

I think this is a film that has the potential to go down as a horror classic. It feels experimental and brave, pushing the boundaries on film-making through the use of its contrast between simplicity and complexity. It’s a horror in many ways from its gore to its mental abusive nature and the inability to trust in its lonely characters makes it a nail-biting experience. I think it’s a real shame this was locked out of almost all categories but glad that Jarin Blaschke was recognised for his phenomenal cinematography. The Lighthouse has proven to be a marmite film among film lovers but it is a deeply rewarding experience and the vision is executed beautifully. It’s a film that I look forward to viewing again and again as I think I’ll notice even more elements that I admire. It makes me keen to see where Eggers’ career will take him next and eager to see if he continues with his great collaborations.

What did you think of The Lighthouse? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Uncut Gems (2019)

I have said this once and I will say it again. When Adam Sandler puts his mind to it, he can turn out a star-studded performance that most dramatic actors can only dream of. He did it in Paul Thomas Anderson’s 2003 Punch-Drunk Love and he’s done it again in the mind-warping Uncut Gems, directed by Josh and Benny Safdie (commonly referred to as the Safdie Brothers). Following Howard Ratner (Sandler), the owner of a luxurious jewellers in the Diamond District in New York and his inability to function as a normal human would. Crippled simultaneously by debt and a gambling addiction to boot, Howard is an awful human being and the Safdies make this no secret. The audience isn’t supposed to like him and yet we do because he is charismatic and pathetic at the same time. When a priceless gem is delivered to him and loaned to basketball star Kevin Garnett, Howard finds himself on the brink of self-destruction as he struggles to get the stone back and at the auction house where he expects to earn millions. Produced by powerhouse studio A24 and distributed on Netflix, Uncut Gems is the film equivalent of an anxiety attack thanks to the unrelenting actions of its protagonist who doesn’t know how to relax. Featuring a variety of celebrity cameos including The Week’nd, Tilda Swinton and Natasha Lyonne, there is also a strong supporting cast led by Lakeith Stanfield as Howard’s assistant, Demany and Julia Fox as Howard’s girlfriend, Julia.

The Safdie Brothers’ vision comes across brilliantly on the technical side. Known for their collaborations with Ronald Bronstein who cowrote the script with both Safdies and also co-edited the film with Benny Safdie. This is a film that needed more than one mind behind the vision and the result is crisp and sleek. The writing is sharp and to the point which is crucial as there are many characters and plenty of scenes in which lots of characters populate the screen. It’s a film that benefits from its direct nature meaning that there are few speeches and little emotion. When the film does delve deep into serious emotion, it feels almost disingenuous because the characters are so self-absorbed. It is the deeply flawed characters that gives the film its grit. What I love most about this film is how fantastical it feels in terms of the tone as Howard lives a luxurious life and yet the violence he is exposed to grounds the film. There is a disconnect between the life Howie should have and the life that he does have. Despite his wealth, he is constantly viewed as an outsider for a multitude of reasons. One such reason is his Jewish faith which is constantly remarked on by his clientele, friends and those he deals with when betting. Another such reason is his inability to maintain sustainable relationships. His paranoia overtakes his love for Julia because he cannot truly fathom that a woman like her could truly love a man like him. His insecurity is a constant throughout the film and is the main reason for his instability.

uncut-garnett-sandler-1576518581

Adam Sandler is nothing short of brilliant in this film and should have been nominated for all of the awards including the Oscar. His performance is manic and seems lucid but the amount of work Sandler put into this character is clear. Howard is deeply complex. He is fully aware of his issues and yet doesn’t do anything about them. The film is constantly moving up and down as Howard’s rollercoaster way of living reflects the wins and losses he experiences in gambling. This film has become instantly quotable with gifs and memes flooding the internet. Howard’s sleaziness only adds to his dark humour and helplessness. The film is from Howard’s perspective meaning Sandler is onscreen for the vast majority of the film’s 135 minute running time. What makes the character of Howard so hypnotic and engaging to watch is that he acts like an unreliable narrator at times. We hope he pulls through but at the same time his flaws often outweigh his strengths. The climactic scene in which Howard is watching the final basketball game that he has bet all of his earnings on is deeply intense and yet he seems relatively calm. His certainty that he will win when his first bet was reliant on a coin toss is unbelievable. If there was an award for the most frustrating character in film history, Howard would definitely be up there but that is exactly how he is meant to be. He is one of the most unlikeable likeable characters I have ever come across and I think it’s credit to Sandler’s skill that he manages to pull that off.

The score provided by Oneohtrix Point Never is a showstopper. The tone that the score gives is in a similar vein to Jóhann Jóhannsson’s brilliant score for the 2018 film, Mandy. Much like Jóhannsson’s score, Oneohtrix Point Never’s score has also proven divisive but I think that Uncut Gems is a film that doesn’t hold back in its performance, script and subject matter. The music is futuristically nostalgic, merging various genres and sounds to create a soundtrack that is unique. Much like the protagonist, the score doesn’t seem to settle and keeps crashing through, heightening the tension and making for an anxiety-ridden audience experience. The score category in awards season was very strong this year but I still think it was a shame that the Uncut Gems soundtrack wasn’t at least recognised. The fact that it clashes with what you see on the screen adds to the jarring effect that the film brought.

uncutgems

Uncut Gems lives up to the hype and delivers brilliance in spades. It’s a shame that it wasn’t recognised this awards season but I believe that Sandler’s performance specifically will not go unnoticed. If anything, Uncut Gems has opened the door for Sandler to continue tackling challenging roles and it makes me excited to see what the Safdie Brothers have planned next. It’s a film that isn’t afraid to make light of the dark topics it explores such as addiction and violence. It’s reluctance to fit into a specific box of film makes it a stand out in the same way that Parasite is and I think it was stronger than a lot of contenders this awards season.

What did you think of Uncut Gems? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

1917 (2019)

1917 is a World War I epic that seems to be the one to beat when it comes to the Best Picture award. Co-written, directed and produced by Sam Mendes, the film acts as a tribute to his grandfather, Alfred Mendes, based on stories that he would tell about the war. Following two young soldiers, Schofield (George MacKay) and Blake (Dean-Charles Chapman) who are tasked with travelling across enemy lines to warn off a British attack before they fall into a trap set by the Germans. The film has become well-regarded for its flawless editing, designed to look like two continuous shots. As well as beautiful technique, 1917 also boasts a stunning cast that includes well-loved actor of the big screen such as Colin Firth and Benedict Cumberbatch as well as TV favourites such as Daniel Mays and Andrew Scott. As expected, Mendes delivers and the continuous shots and editing only exemplify the non-stop nature of war. There is only one point in which the audience is allowed to relax at the start of the third act of the film. The writing is simple as Mendes lays focus on the physicality and the atmosphere rather than the dialogue. There are few monologues and those with speeches such as Andrew Scott’s Lieutenant Leslie are at rare moments of stand still. Co-written by Mendes and Krysty Wilson-Cairns, the script is minimalist in dialogue. Even when following the two Lance Corporals on their journey, we never really hear Schofield’s backstory because he is so withdrawn. One brilliant scene is when Schofield is picked up by a passing British unit and they are sat in the back of a truck. Schofield sits silently as the soldiers around him comment on their various backgrounds, imitate their General and comment on whether occupying other countries is worth the damage. It’s a poignant scene which brings in a humane aspect that is often missing from World War films.

The performances are impressive, particularly by George MacKay who is always on camera. He carries the film in the same way that he carries the message to the troops. It is no easy feat as an actor to hold so much pressure from such a big film but MacKay has shown promise from the early days in his career and his subsequent breakout performances in Pride (2014) and Captain Fantastic (2016). 1917 exploits MacKay to a mainstream audience that he won’t have been subject to in such a way previously. His Lance Corporal Schofield is reluctant to go on the mission and keeps his cards close to his chest but his determination to see it through is fearless, particularly in the final scenes as he runs through the trenches. Schofield and Blake appear to have different takes for their mission at the beginning. Blake is insistent on setting off immediately whereas Schofield logically believes in waiting until dark. Because of the emotional stake that Blake has in the mission (his brother is among the troops heading into the trap), Schofield has to ensure that Blake’s heart doesn’t lead his head.

1917

The two protagonists balance each other out as Blake risks his own life to save Schofield when a bomb is set off in a German trench. Chapman is also fantastic as Blake who appears naïve due to his sentimental nature. When encountering a German soldier whose plane was shot down in a dogfight, Blake’s gut reaction is to assist and get the soldier some water to ease the pain whereas Schofield doesn’t hesitate to shoot at the enemy. As mentioned before, the supporting cast is littered with stars from the small and silver screens. Admittedly, the supporting cast are granted one scene each so it’s more of a cameo, but each actor makes the most of their moments. Andrew Scott particularly delivers a brilliant monologue as a Lieutenant who has little hope in winning the war whereas Benedict Cumberbatch’s Colonel Mackenzie views he retreat from battle as a sign of defeat. The fleeting appearances from the supporting characters is thanks to the perfectly linear narrative of the film itself. We see the two Lance Corporals setting off to warn the Devonshire Regiment and ending with Schofield sat beside a tree in a mirror image of the opening shot.

It would be a big misjustice not to mention the revolutionary cinematography and editing provided by Roger Deakins and Lee Smith, respectively. Both men are at the top of the game in their respected fields and they work fantastically as a team. What these men have managed to achieve feels as claustrophobic and in your face as the war itself. There are many comments from people saying that the continuous effect took some getting used to but for me it felt natural and flowed perfectly. The editing is in a similar vein to the technique used in Birdman but on a bigger scale. What Deakins does so brilliantly is simultaneously provide big explosions shots filled with action while also maintaining great focus on the individual protagonists’ faces. Despite everything that is going on around the soldiers, the audiences’ eyes are fixated on the characters. Deakins’ colour palette is muted as expected in a war film with greens and browns. There are no exaggerated colours or futuristic spectacles. Deakins ensures that the film is very much grounded in its reality. Together, Deakins and Smith manage to create a film that is visually captivating and stunning, making the best use of the environment given and its limited landscapes.

19172

On the musical side of things, Thomas Newman’s score for this film is beyond incredible and has deservedly earned him his 15th Academy Award nomination. This year has seen a strong competition in the score category with both Thomas and Randy Newman pulling punches for their scores for 1917 and Marriage Story, respectively. Undoubtedly, the Best Original Score gong will go to Hildur Guðnadóttir for her stellar work on Joker making her the first woman to walk away with the award. It shouldn’t go unnoticed, however, that Thomas Newman’s score is among his best. Much like the editing, the film is reliant on its score which acts like a thread connecting the scenes. Needless to say, if Newman does end up winning, I wouldn’t be disappointed.

Overall, 1917 has proven to be a much better film than I had originally anticipated and I found myself moved and stunned by the technical and artistic achievement that Mendes has managed to pull off. I’m not sure if it’s a film that you need to watch more than once as I personally got everything out of the film that I needed in one go. I imagine that in time, it will become renowned and known for its technical aspects and the uniqueness in that field rather than the characters.

What do you think of 1917? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Yentl (1983)

Barbra Streisand’s directorial debut follows the titular character (Streisand), a young woman living in an Ashkenazi Jewish community in the early 20th century who disguises as a man to study in a Yeshiva after her father passes away. Based on the short story by Isaac Bashevis Singer and cowritten by Streisand and Jack Rosenthal, Yentl is a film about subverting the cultural and societal norm as well as conflicts between religion and morality. Yentl Mendel is constantly questioning the way of life in her village and is looked down upon by the townspeople for being unmarried with no prospect of settling down. It is only when she disguises as a man called Anshel that she finds a place of belonging and her views are accepted and even celebrated. Problems occur when Yentl begins to fall in love with her mentor, Avigdor (Mandy Patinkin) who is in love with his ex-fiancée Hadass (Amy Irving) who then in turn falls in love with Anshel. It is the very definition of a love triangle and allows the film to have some lighter moments such as Anshel and Hadass’ wedding night. Winning Streisand a Best Director award at the Golden Globes making her the first and to date only woman to win the accolade, Yentl marks a huge step for female filmmakers in the mainstream thanks to its star appeal and critical and commercial success.

Streisand as director is really remarkable. You can sense the passion that she has for this film. Although there are trademark comedic moments and musical numbers that are identifiable with a Streisand picture, there is no doubt that the dramatic elements and aesthetic allow Streisand to explore a darker approach that we hadn’t really seen from her on film previously. Streisand’s female gaze gives this film a new perspective that we haven’t seen before in film. Instead of condemning Yentl’s choices, we view Anshel as a sensitive man who isn’t afraid of his vulnerability despite living in a male dominated environment. Where it not for Streisand’s feminine interpretation, the performance of Anshel could have slipped into caricature and taken away from the mature themes that the film discusses. Streisand lends a heavy feminist focus as she disputes why a woman cannot have the same outlook and expectation of a man while still appreciating the jobs that the women do. Yentl can be viewed as a crossover between genders and she doesn’t really fit in and altering her gender isn’t an issue. The pursuit of knowledge and equality overtakes the ideals expected of her. There are so many different readings that could be made when watching this film. It has been argued that Yentl could be considered as a queer film thanks to its discussions on gender and sexuality which adds a more progressive meaning to the story.

yentl.jpg

In terms of her performance, it’s best to view Streisand as playing two roles rather than one such is her success in distinctly differentiating the two. Her Yentl is typical Streisand: sassy, witty and strong with an ambition to subvert the norm. This is the Streisand that we have grown to love in her previous cinematic outings. What is different about Yentl is that she is aware that she is trapped within her local community. When reciting the Talmud at her father’s funeral, it becomes such a scandal and causes widespread gossip. The transition period between Yentl and Anshel comes from her journey to the Yeshiva which includes her heartbreaking rendition of “Papa, Can You Hear Me?” where Yentl begs her father for forgiveness for her decision to disguise as a man in pursuit of an education. She sits alone in the forest at nighttime with nothing but a candle for light and it is then when the realisation of what she has done comes to fruition. It is also the point where she knows that there is no turning back and thus has to embody the identity of Anshel. Streisand’s Anshel takes a bit of getting used to in the same way as Yentl getting used to her new identity. We witness Anshel practicing his tone of voice and mannerisms, making sure not to appear too feminine without risking his integrity.

Mandy Patinkin does a wonderful job as Avigdor, Anshel’s friend and mentor at the Yeshiva who is initially engaged to Hadass. Avigdor isn’t afraid to be vulnerable to Anshel and his other male friends but the idea of being vulnerable to Hadass or her mother disgusts him. He doesn’t allow himself to get involved in any confrontation and is always calm when in her company. Avigdor seems so progressive when we are first introduced because he is so accepting of Anshel but it is easy to forget that Anshel is Yentl and he has no idea. When he spouts ideas about a woman’s true place in the home and that Hadass cannot think for herself, it comes across as a shock and ignorant but despite his intelligence, Avigdor is still a product of an environment that looks down on women. In another brilliant supporting turn, Amy Irving was deservedly nominated for an Oscar for Best Supporting Actress in her role as Hadass. When we first meet Hadass, she appears to fulfill all the criteria of the perfect woman and seems to do everything at the men’s commands. What we don’t realise is that she has successfully supressed any feeling of rebellion and it is when she is married to Anshel that she shares her aspirations to learn more. Yentl is in the middle of these two characters and yet it is because of Yentl that they are drawn closer together and allow themselves a more progressive and happier life.

yentl2.png

The amazing music is composed by Michel Legrand, one of the best composers that the film industry had to offer. From his imagination we were given the incredible song “Papa, Can You Hear Me?” composed by Legrand with lyrics written by Alan and Marilyn Bergman. The trio won an Oscar for Best Original Song Score and Its Adaptation or Adaptation Score. In true Legrand fashion, the music is whimsical and brings an essence of fairytale to the story. The musical numbers are far and few between but the score itself is wonderfully subtle when you compare to Legrand’s catalogue such as the music for Les Parapluies De Cherbourg (The Umbrellas of Cherbourg). The songs are suited to Streisand’s amazing vocal range, especially the aforementioned song but rather than being full of show-stopping numbers like the ones in Funny Girl, Legrand makes use of Yentl’s male identity and gives the songs a lower key register so Yentl is singing as if she were a man herself.

Overall, Yentl is a film that has helped pave the way for female filmmakers in mainstream cinema. It is a film not without flaws but it has beauty in its ability to discuss ideas that are considered taboo. Even within the Orthodox setting in the early 20th century, there are still similarities that Streisand is able to get across to link with the modern day. Yentl is not a film that Streisand wishes to make all about herself despite directing and starring in it but the story of how women are often subjected to misogyny and not afforded the chances of their male counterparts. It is equal parts drama and musical and a smaller part comedy which encapsulates Yentl’s character.

What did you think of Yentl? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

The Wizard of Oz (1939)

With the hype of awards season in full swing, I thought I would take a look back at some older favourites of mine. Inspired by the Judy Garland biopic, Judy, what better way to connect the current awards season with a favourite classic of mine and discuss the wonderfully magical The Wizard of Oz (1939). Commonly seen as the film that propelled Judy Garland to stardom at the tender age of 16, cementing her legacy in Hollywood for years to come. The film is adored by fans of all ages and a regular watch at Christmastime. Following Kansas teen Dorothy Gale who is whisked away in a tornado along with her dog, Toto and landing in the mysterious land of Oz. Dorothy must team up with the unlikeliest of friends and find the great Wizard to find her way home. The film was mainly directed by Victor Fleming who left the production to direct Gone With the Wind and the remaining work was taken over by King Vidor. The screenplay was written by Noel Langley, Florence Ryerson and Edgar Allan Woolf and based on the classic children’s book The Wonderful Wizard of Oz by L. Frank Baum, The Wizard of Oz is a masterclass in classic Hollywood cinema.

Judy Garland is absolutely breathtaking as Dorothy. Probably one of the most perfect casting choices in film history. From her brilliant expressions and sheer talent for being an all-rounder, it’s hard not to feel moved by Garland’s performance, particularly when she sings “Over the Rainbow”. Garland’s background and the tragedy behind her experience filming this is well-known. The trauma Garland went through during the filming was sure to have had a lasting effect on her for the rest of her life. This makes the performance even more heartbreaking watching in retrospect. Dorothy has enough bravery and courage to face her enemies and stand up for herself but there is still vulnerability there and a maturity that makes her seem older than her years while at the same time bringing in that childlike innocence.

In terms of the supporting cast, the most iconic comes in the form of Margaret Hamilton’s brilliant turn as the Wicked Witch of the West. She’s just a plain nasty character and her only motive is ensuring that Dorothy doesn’t succeed in her quest. Hamilton’s voice and characterisation is a performance of legend and has resulted in one of the most identifiable villains in film history. Whether it is one of her trademarks such as “I’ll get you, my pretty, and your little dog too” to the iconic melting scene in which we see the Wicked Witch defeated after Dorothy throws a bucket of water over her. Out of the three friends, my favourite is the Cowardly Lion (Bert Lahr), mainly because I love the costume design so much and his performance of the song “If I Were King of the Forest”. It’s a film that is rich in distinguished characters that, although simple, does a good job of giving them enough screen time to be distinguishable.

I don’t know where to begin to talk about my love for the use of colour in this film. Aside from being iconic thanks to its amazing switch from black and white to brilliant technicolour with the simple opening of a door. There is so much to look into beyond Kansas representing the normal and dreary everyday and Oz being somewhere completely different. The location and setting for Kansas is natural with realistic looking prop whereas Oz is crammed full of fake creations. Munchkinland in particular is the epitome of the Oz aesthetic. It makes for a fantastically striking entrance into the land of Oz. Maybe it’s because we’re adjusted to the black and white set up that makes the colour pop out the screen even more, the design of Oz is truly spectacular. Also, the use of colour for the characters is beautifully done. From the contrast between the ruby red slippers that Dorothy wears with the Wicked Witch’s green skin and the metallic hue of the Tin Man’s paint with the Cowardly Lion’s golden mane. Oz is a land that although entirely built from imagination, also includes a multitude of texture.

I’ve already touched on the music before but it deserves a section on its own. The film is crammed full of brilliant songs that have stood the test of time. Undoubtedly, “Over the Rainbow” is the most popular but most people would also be able to sing or hum along to the likes of “Ding-Dong! The Witch is Dead” and “If I Only Had a Brain”. It is undeniable that Garland’s voice is beautiful and flawless, striking the perfect amount of emotion in her songs. Looking through the soundtrack, it is amazing to think that so many songs have gone down in cinema history as classics. A lot of the legacy from The Wizard of Oz comes from its Academy Award winning score by Herbert Stothart. Not to forget that “Over the Rainbow” also won the Oscar for Best Original Song for Harold Arlen and Yip Harburg. It’s a whimsical soundtrack that allows its audience to escape to Oz with Dorothy.

I am sure given that I love films like Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs and The Red Shoes that I am just as fond of this one. The Wizard of Oz is an outstandingly beautiful cinematic achievement and a prime example of a film that is suitable for all ages and all cinematic tastes. It is a film that combines drama, comedy and musical while also not fearing to delving into themes of loss and friendship. Dorothy is ultimately on a journey to finding out who she is and discovering her place of belonging. It’s this relatability that makes the film so identifiable with audiences around the globe.

What do you think of The Wizard of Oz? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Dolemite Is My Name (2019)

Dolemite Is My Name is a brilliant look into the life of African-American icon Rudy Ray Moore played by Eddie Murphy in a career best performance. Moore is a man of many talents: acting, singing and stand-up. His comedy routines are his way into fame as he channels an alter ego Dolemite, a pimp style man of the 70s who speaks in rhyme and quickly builds up a fan base within the African-American community across the US. The film specifically follows his rise to stardom and the production of his first film Dolemite, a blaxploitation feature in which he plays his comedic alter ego. Directed by Craig Brewer and written by Scott Alexander and Larry Karaszewski, Dolemite is my Name marks a welcome return to Eddie Murphy as a leading man on the big screen and also boasts a brilliant supporting cast with Craig Robinson, Tituss Burgess, Keegan-Michael Key and Snoop Dogg. It’s brash and upfront, unafraid of its subject and showing just how far one will go for their time in the spotlight. The writing is spectacular and even the scenes where Moore isn’t speaking in rhyme almost have a poetic quality to them. Every pause and interaction has a flow that works brilliantly in the film and the characters interact naturally. You completely believe and engage with the characters and at no point are drawn away from the film. The direction is quick and sharp with eye-catching colour palettes that exemplify Moore’s even more colourful personality. Everything about this film was completely wonderful to watch.

In a sea of biopics, it would be easy to miss this one which seemed to sneak onto Netflix without fanfare but that would be your loss. Moore is a man who loves the limelight and will do anything to get it. He will do whatever it takes to become famous even if it means nudity, violence or strong language. He isn’t afraid of vulgarity and thrives on the offensive nature of his content. Who better to play such a controversial figure than Eddie Murphy? Murphy allows himself to embrace all aspects of Moore’s personality from his strong bravado to his insecurities and flaws. He has left no stone unturned in his preparation and the result is a captivating and stunning performance that does the Moore legacy proud. I hope Murphy continues releasing films like this that show his talent and range as an actor. In this film alone, he has to sing, act and perform stand-up as a man who is himself portraying a character. That is tricky to pull off and yet Murphy seems to do this effortlessly. This is a film that has a big cast list and yet Murphy is the draw and the centre of attention at all times. There aren’t many moments when he isn’t onscreen and yet his presence is anticipated and felt. Of course, this is only natural since it is a biopic on his character but it really is a magnetic performance.

dolemite

As mentioned before, the supporting cast is crammed full of amazing talent. If I had to choose one that stands out from the rest, it is probably Keegan-Michael Key as screenwriter and actor Jerry Jones. Jones is an earnest playwright who makes films that explore racism in modern society. When initially approached by Moore to write the screenplay for the Dolemite movie, he is reluctant to jump onboard but is eventually taken in by the scope of Moore’s fanbase. His reactions during and after filming the sex scene for the movie is priceless. Jones is a character who is taken way out of his comfort and it initially makes him seem like the only sane person in a crazy bunch but eventually he allows himself to have fun with it. I also really enjoyed Craig Robinson’s appearance as Moore’s friend, Ben Taylor, who provides the theme song for the Dolemite movie. His role is only small but when he is onscreen, it’s wonderful to watch. The character of Taylor is great to watch as it shows his support from before Moore’s fame and ascension. The supporting characters really do support one another. It is a film that, although centred around one individual, tells the stories of multiple people. One touching story is Lady Reed (Da’Vine Joy Randolph) who is cheated on by her husband and doesn’t know what to do with her life. Alongside Moore, she stars in the film and joins him on the stage for stand-up. Although she is assisted by Moore, Lady Reed is strongly independent and isn’t afraid of sticking up for herself and her beliefs. The scene in which she thanks Moore for putting a plus size woman of colour onscreen allows Moore to realise that his project goes beyond entertaining people.

Although it has grabbed the attention of awards panels, particularly Eddie Murphy’s performance, it feels as though Dolemite Is My Name has been swept under the carpet. This could be due to Netflix’s loyalty to its other release, The Irishman, and so they have pushed that far more. In truth, I prefer Dolmite Is My Name as a film because it feels like something new and unique whereas The Irishman brings out what Scorsese does best but nothing that we haven’t seen before. I hope that if anything Murphy gets an Oscar nomination because it would be a real shame not to acknowledge the brilliant work he does on this film.

dolemite1

In a climate that has seen a rise in racism and extremist politics taking hold, Dolemite Is My Name is a film that is desperately needed. It is thoroughly entertaining and provides plenty of laughs but it equally holds no punches in its subject matter and isn’t afraid to explore the darker truths of society. It’s interesting to think that such a diverse figure such as Moore was renowned and accepted in the 70s but the struggle and work he had to put in to get there is testament to the struggles that African-Americans face on a regular basis. I hope that there are more films like this released in coming years as it is so important to present stories from all walks of life.

What did you think of Dolemite Is My Name? Let me know in the comments below!