Categories
Uncategorised

Last Night in Soho (2021)

Trigger warning: This review delves into various aspects of Last Night in Soho, including its depiction of sexual assault and rape.

Edgar Wright’s latest film Last Night in Soho had its premiere at this year’s Venice Film Festival and has undoubtedly been one of the most discussed films of the year so far due to its eclectic merging of genres and time periods. The film follows aspiring fashion designer, Ellie (Thomasin McKenzie) as she moves to London to study fashion design at the London College of Fashion. Not everything is so simple though as Ellie is able to see the ghost of her mother in mirrors and when she moves into a bedsit after her stay in student halls go wrong, she begins to see visions of a young woman called, Sandie (Anya Taylor-Joy) and her struggle to become a famous singer in 1960s London. What follows is a film filled with many twists and turns until Ellie begins to lose her sense of self as the past begins to catch up with her and she finds herself at the heart of a mystery that explores darker and timely subject matters such as sexual assault, loss, and treatment of women.

The film is directed by Edgar Wright who cowrote the screenplay with Krysty Wilson-Cairns. The film is filled with Wright’s signature flair and use of vibrant colors. However, where a lot of Wright’s previous films are filled to the brim with larger than life characters, there aren’t as many in Last Night in Soho. This could be because the film dives into much darker territory than others and doesn’t have the same level of humour. A lot of the controversy generated from Last Night in Soho is with regards to the writing and it’s clear that Wright and Wilson-Cairns have tried to use the paradox between periods to discuss sexual assault but it doesn’t feel as though the script delves deep enough into the trauma and psyche of the victim while explicitly showing various scenes of abuse and rape. To see such an unflinching depiction of sexual violence against a female character has caused a lot of understandable upset amongst victims and the level of upset could be because the script doesn’t do a lot to delve deeper into the mentality and characterisation of the female characters as it could have done.

Thomasin McKenzie plays the film’s lead, Ellie, and it’s great to see her star on the rise as she has provided such brilliant performances previously. McKenzie does what she can with the character but it doesn’t feel as though Ellie’s character is fleshed out enough which is unfortunate as McKenzie is a fantastic actress. On the surface, it can seem that Ellie simply has visions and then subsequently runs around screaming but there is obviously something a lot deeper going on. It could be argued that her mental health has taken a toll since the loss of her mother and it would have been so interesting to see the screenplay delve into this aspect a bit more so we could understand Ellie better. Even though she is the protagonist, Ellie is an observer and an outsider in her own world and the world of the 1960s. When she is dreaming, she is lurking on the edges of the frame as she enters Sandie’s world whereas in her own life, she is an outcast among her peers and cannot seem to fit in anywhere. It feels as though the film happens around Ellie and we don’t see her character develop as much as it should do through the film’s two hour running time.

The highlight of the film is Anya Taylor-Joy as Sandie, the woman Ellie observes in the 1960s. From the moment Sandie enters the film in a flowing pink chiffon dress with her hair in a bouffant style, the film begins to find its momentum. Taylor-Joy is absolutely electric as Sandie and is arguably the film’s heartbeat and keeps the audience gripped. Sandie is an aspiring singer who befriends manager, Jack (Matt Smith), who promises her the world so long as she stays by his side. What follows is a downwards spiral where Sandie is taken advantage of at the hands of many men thanks to Jack’s greed and lust for control. Even in the film’s darkest moments, it is Taylor-Joy’s sincere portrayal of Sandie that lets the audience into the world that the film inhabits and wanting to know how the story ends.

Another small but great performance is provided by the late, great Diana Rigg as Ellie’s landlady, Ms Collins. As mentioned, it is only a small role but she fills it with such intrigue that when she is onscreen, she grabs the attention. Her final scene in which she confides in Ellie is brilliant and highly intense, showing that you don’t need bells and whistles for great characterisation whilst also boasting the flawless subtleties when reflecting on her previous scenes.

Another highlight of the film is the original score by Steven Price which highlights the horror tones of the film. A lot of the tracks feel reminiscent of horror films from 1960s and its clear that this is what Price wanted to convey. It is the score that provides the dark undertone throughout the whole film and leaves the audience in anticipation, especially as the visions start to take place and the puzzle begins to piece itself together.

Last Night in Soho is a difficult film to discuss due to its subject matter and the way this is handled. It is clear that it has been made with good intentions but whether it is successful in what it is trying to say is another thing. There are aspects of Last Night in Soho that are great such as Anya Taylor-Joy’s performance and Steven Price’s score but the overall tone of the film feels conflicted and confused, especially as Ellie’s characterisation doesn’t feel completely realised. Last Night in Soho is a departure from Wright’s other films and although it doesn’t have the same spark as his previous outings, it will be interesting to see where his career goes next.

What did you think of Last Night in Soho? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

1917 (2019)

1917 is a World War I epic that seems to be the one to beat when it comes to the Best Picture award. Co-written, directed and produced by Sam Mendes, the film acts as a tribute to his grandfather, Alfred Mendes, based on stories that he would tell about the war. Following two young soldiers, Schofield (George MacKay) and Blake (Dean-Charles Chapman) who are tasked with travelling across enemy lines to warn off a British attack before they fall into a trap set by the Germans. The film has become well-regarded for its flawless editing, designed to look like two continuous shots. As well as beautiful technique, 1917 also boasts a stunning cast that includes well-loved actor of the big screen such as Colin Firth and Benedict Cumberbatch as well as TV favourites such as Daniel Mays and Andrew Scott. As expected, Mendes delivers and the continuous shots and editing only exemplify the non-stop nature of war. There is only one point in which the audience is allowed to relax at the start of the third act of the film. The writing is simple as Mendes lays focus on the physicality and the atmosphere rather than the dialogue. There are few monologues and those with speeches such as Andrew Scott’s Lieutenant Leslie are at rare moments of stand still. Co-written by Mendes and Krysty Wilson-Cairns, the script is minimalist in dialogue. Even when following the two Lance Corporals on their journey, we never really hear Schofield’s backstory because he is so withdrawn. One brilliant scene is when Schofield is picked up by a passing British unit and they are sat in the back of a truck. Schofield sits silently as the soldiers around him comment on their various backgrounds, imitate their General and comment on whether occupying other countries is worth the damage. It’s a poignant scene which brings in a humane aspect that is often missing from World War films.

The performances are impressive, particularly by George MacKay who is always on camera. He carries the film in the same way that he carries the message to the troops. It is no easy feat as an actor to hold so much pressure from such a big film but MacKay has shown promise from the early days in his career and his subsequent breakout performances in Pride (2014) and Captain Fantastic (2016). 1917 exploits MacKay to a mainstream audience that he won’t have been subject to in such a way previously. His Lance Corporal Schofield is reluctant to go on the mission and keeps his cards close to his chest but his determination to see it through is fearless, particularly in the final scenes as he runs through the trenches. Schofield and Blake appear to have different takes for their mission at the beginning. Blake is insistent on setting off immediately whereas Schofield logically believes in waiting until dark. Because of the emotional stake that Blake has in the mission (his brother is among the troops heading into the trap), Schofield has to ensure that Blake’s heart doesn’t lead his head.

1917

The two protagonists balance each other out as Blake risks his own life to save Schofield when a bomb is set off in a German trench. Chapman is also fantastic as Blake who appears naïve due to his sentimental nature. When encountering a German soldier whose plane was shot down in a dogfight, Blake’s gut reaction is to assist and get the soldier some water to ease the pain whereas Schofield doesn’t hesitate to shoot at the enemy. As mentioned before, the supporting cast is littered with stars from the small and silver screens. Admittedly, the supporting cast are granted one scene each so it’s more of a cameo, but each actor makes the most of their moments. Andrew Scott particularly delivers a brilliant monologue as a Lieutenant who has little hope in winning the war whereas Benedict Cumberbatch’s Colonel Mackenzie views he retreat from battle as a sign of defeat. The fleeting appearances from the supporting characters is thanks to the perfectly linear narrative of the film itself. We see the two Lance Corporals setting off to warn the Devonshire Regiment and ending with Schofield sat beside a tree in a mirror image of the opening shot.

It would be a big misjustice not to mention the revolutionary cinematography and editing provided by Roger Deakins and Lee Smith, respectively. Both men are at the top of the game in their respected fields and they work fantastically as a team. What these men have managed to achieve feels as claustrophobic and in your face as the war itself. There are many comments from people saying that the continuous effect took some getting used to but for me it felt natural and flowed perfectly. The editing is in a similar vein to the technique used in Birdman but on a bigger scale. What Deakins does so brilliantly is simultaneously provide big explosions shots filled with action while also maintaining great focus on the individual protagonists’ faces. Despite everything that is going on around the soldiers, the audiences’ eyes are fixated on the characters. Deakins’ colour palette is muted as expected in a war film with greens and browns. There are no exaggerated colours or futuristic spectacles. Deakins ensures that the film is very much grounded in its reality. Together, Deakins and Smith manage to create a film that is visually captivating and stunning, making the best use of the environment given and its limited landscapes.

19172

On the musical side of things, Thomas Newman’s score for this film is beyond incredible and has deservedly earned him his 15th Academy Award nomination. This year has seen a strong competition in the score category with both Thomas and Randy Newman pulling punches for their scores for 1917 and Marriage Story, respectively. Undoubtedly, the Best Original Score gong will go to Hildur Guðnadóttir for her stellar work on Joker making her the first woman to walk away with the award. It shouldn’t go unnoticed, however, that Thomas Newman’s score is among his best. Much like the editing, the film is reliant on its score which acts like a thread connecting the scenes. Needless to say, if Newman does end up winning, I wouldn’t be disappointed.

Overall, 1917 has proven to be a much better film than I had originally anticipated and I found myself moved and stunned by the technical and artistic achievement that Mendes has managed to pull off. I’m not sure if it’s a film that you need to watch more than once as I personally got everything out of the film that I needed in one go. I imagine that in time, it will become renowned and known for its technical aspects and the uniqueness in that field rather than the characters.

What do you think of 1917? Let me know in the comments below!