Tag: author

Categories
Uncategorised

BFI Flare Festival 2021: Tove

Another film that I was especially keen to watch at this year’s BFI Flare Festival was Tove, a biopic about Tove Jansson who is known as the creator, author and illustrator of the Moomin book series. Directed by Zaida Bergroth from a screenplay, written by Eeva Putro, the film follows Tove (Alma Pöysti) and her life before and during her success as an artist. Her turbulent career as a traditional artist and her reluctance to follow in her father’s footsteps brings in a lot of initial problems. A chance encounter with aristocratic theatre director Vivica Bandler (Krista Kosonen) at a gallery opening sparked a love affair between the two women and a friendship that would last through their lifetime. Tove was entered by Finland for the Best International Film Award at the upcoming Academy Awards but sadly did not make the shortlist. This is such a shame as it is a very strong film that deserves to have a wide audience.

Zaida Bergroth’s direction is brilliantly as we become immersed into Jansson’s world at the end of the Second World War. With sole focus on Jansson, there are no scenes in which she doesn’t grace the screen ensuring that the audience really is seeing the world through her eyes. The screenplay by Putro is beautifully paced and gives an in depth glance into one of Finland’s famous figures. Tove is a film that doesn’t force the events to happen to its protagonist but simply let them happen naturally as the film unfolds. Feeling natural and authentic, the minimalistic approach has sprinkles of absurd moments such as the first moment of the film where we see Tove dancing to jazz music by herself. This film paints the perfect picture of an author who has inspired and captivated many throughout the world.

Alma Pöysti’s performance as Jansson is fantastic and reminded me a lot of Marion Cotillard’s performance as Edith Piaf in La Vie en Rose in that she drives the film and elevates the whole experience. Pöysti is captivating from the very first second you see her onscreen to the last thanks to her layered characterisation that showcases her inner conflicts with both her art and personal life. There is no doubt that Jansson was most comfortable when able to express herself how she wants and so she surrounds herself with the people and art that are going to allow her to do this. Blasting jazz music and working tirelessly on her Moomin universe, Jansson seemed to be an otherworldly creature and Pöysti pulls this off. Pöysti doesn’t overplay the character nor does she force the emotions to come to the surface. What makes her performance so special and unique to watch

Krista Kosonen is great in support as Vivica Bandler, the woman who stole Jansson’s heart. Initially paying for Tove’s services to design a party invitation, the relationship between the two women quickly evolves to a romance that becomes turbulent over the years. Kosonen is a great onscreen partner for Pöysti and the scenes between them are filled with tension and chemistry. Whereas Tove is more introverted and working endlessly on being accepted by the City as a certified artist, Vivica is extroverted and confident in herself. Initiating the relationship with Jansson, Bandler’s portrayal is one of manipulation and mixed signals as Jansson doesn’t know what to expect when she next sees her. Kosonen portrays Bandler as hard to read and unpredictable and the status of their relationship propels the film’s events forward as they work together on adapting the Moomins for the stage.

One thing that stood out to me in this film was the score and soundtrack. The original score composed by Matti Bye is beautiful and unpredictable and reminded me a lot of Jonny Greenwood’s score for Phantom Thread. Bye’s score works so well as it reflects the turbulence and conflict Tove is feeling and rises it to the surface. The classical sound contrasts with the soundtrack choices which contains a lot of jazz music. This chaotic mix of classical and jazz only serves to highlight Jansson’s own position as a child of prominent, traditional artists whilst also remaining progressive in her style and refusing to conform who live to the expectations set out for her.

Overall, Tove is an exceptional film that does a great job of showing Tove’s struggle to be seen in an industry that is dominated by men that also rely on the traditional aesthetics. Tove is often known for her work on the Moomins and while this aspect is shown in the film, the central focus relies on Tove as a person first. Pöysti’s performance is fantastic and should be discussed widely as it is a true tour de force. She becomes Jansson and pulls it off with ease that we forget we are even watching a biopic.

Tove is showing at this year’s BFI Flare Festival.

Categories
Uncategorised

The Queen’s Gambit

The show that everyone has been talking about at the minute is a series that revolves around chess. The Queen’s Gambit follows female chess player, Beth Harmon, and her quest to become the world’s best chess player period. The show was created by Scott Frank and Allan Scott and based on the 1983 novel of the same name by Walter Tevis. A lot of people have commented that the show has made a boring subject amazing but I beg to differ. I think it’s a brilliant show enhanced by an interesting and unexpected topic. As someone who used to play chess when they were little, it is an understatement to say that the competitions were very much male-dominated and there was more anticipation for the male categories than the females. Beth is subject to much belittlement and astonishment from her male peers. Even when at the top of her game, she is looked down upon by the grandmasters and champions.

To assume that the show is just about chess is to undermine it completely. Beneath the surface, we encounter themes of gender inequality, gender roles, alcoholism, drug addiction and loss among many more. In a way, all of these issues are brought to the light through chess and specifically Beth’s journey in the game. From the very beginning, Beth is an outsider as she doesn’t enjoy the same activities to her counterparts. The moment she sees the orphanage custodian, Mr Shaibel (Bill Camp), playing chess in the basement, she is curious and eager to learn. This curiosity then turns into an obsession fueled by tranquilliser drugs the orphanage controversially gives its pupils. Beth becomes a product of a traumatic childhood and her inability to lose gracefully and overanalyse hinders her at important moments in her career. Because of her reluctance to conform to societal ideals, she is often reclusive and isolated but all the more determined to climb her way to the top. The shows structure does a great job at presenting her challenges and obstacles.

Anya Taylor-Joy’s performance as Beth is nothing short of revolutionary. She is so captivating that every expression and word leaves the audience waiting with anticipation. Beth is one of the most complex female characters that TV has seen in a while. Academically brilliant and naturally talented at chess, she also struggles with drug and drink addiction as well as an unhealthy obsession with the game. Chronicling her life from her time in an orphanage after her mother’s tragic suicide to her adulthood in which she travels the world playing grandmasters in a bid to become one herself, The Queen’s Gambit is the most exciting and riveting TV show to air this year. From a curious novice to a strategic professional, Beth’s story is one of aspiration and tragedy as her career’s incline also results in an inner downwards spiral. Despite her flaws, the audience still roots for Beth and that’s mainly due to Taylor-Joy’s ability to really dig deep in her characterisation.

In support, Marielle Heller does a stunning performance as Beth’s adoptive mother, Alma Wheatley. Alma is a sickly woman who quickly gages onto Beth’s potential as a chess prodigy and assists her in her first bout of tournaments. I am very familiar with Heller’s work as a director (you can read my previous post on her films here) but haven’t encountered her in an acting role before. An important character in the first half of the series, Alma is just as flawed as her daughter. Leaving Beth to her own devices most of the time as she succumbs to frequent sickness and alcoholism, Alma is both a friend and mother, although the latter comes later as Beth begins to succeed in professional chess. Watching the intense moments between Beth and Alma makes for some of the highlights in the show as well as Alma’s ability to bring out the more human side of Beth.

In a year full of unfortunate events piled on more unfortunate events, The Queen’s Gambit is the show we all need for a good dose of quality television. I predict that Taylor-Joy will be the one to beat at the Golden Globes and hopefully will even receive Emma recognition as well. The fact that it has received overwhelming praise from female chess players, including grandmaster Jennifer Shahade, is only proof of the impeccable details and emotion that has been poured into every second. Without a doubt, The Queen’s Gambit is my favourite new show of the year and I don’t think it will be beaten.

The Queen’s Gambit is available to watch on Netflix and I strongly recommend you catch it if you haven’t seen it yet.

Categories
Uncategorised

Judy (2019)

Based on the last years and concerts of Judy Garland’s life, Judy is one of the most talked about films going into this awards season thanks to the starring turn by Renée Zellweger in the titular role. Biopics have always been a popular go-to for actors who want to subvert casting types and show their range and this seems to be no exception for Zellweger who foregoes her famed reputation as the comedic gem in Bridget Jones. As an avid fan of Judy Garland, I was really interested to see whether Zellweger pulls it off and it truly is a film that revolves around the performance and acts as an Oscar lull for the actress who has mainly stayed out of the spotlight for years. Directed by Rupert Goold, a director renowned for his theatre work with a script written by Tom Edge based on the musical The End of the Rainbow by Peter Quilter, Judy is the heartbreaking reality of a faded star who longs to stay in the spotlight but is plighted by a lifetime of abuse which finally catches up with her in the form drug and alcohol abuse. Flashbacks to her youth which see Darci Shaw play a young Garland (superbly I might add) in which she is constantly berated for her appearance whilst also experiencing harassment, forced drug use and general anxieties in terms of how she must eat and act at all times.

Goold’s direction is intensely focused on its star. When we see Judy perform for the first time, the camera never leaves her, instead focusing on each movement and mannerism that Zellweger conjures up. There is a distinct use of palette used in the film as the Hollywood scenes of Judy’s youth are bright and playful whereas the London setting for her concerts in the present day is darker and drearier. The illusion of fame has long since faded which Goold brings across. The decision to bring in events that didn’t happen in real life is something that I am unsure about. A life as eventful as Judy Garland’s isn’t in need of any fictionalisation and I feel that the inclusion of these scenes detracts from the film. The main fictionalised event was the inclusion of gay couple, Dan (Andy Nyman) and Stan (Daniel Cerqueira) who wait for Judy at the stage door and have dinner with her in their flat. I understand the inclusion of these characters as it is a way to show Judy’s support for the gay community and the performances from Nyman and Cerqueira are heartfelt and sincere. My only concern is the ending scene in which they start a singalong to “Over the Rainbow” when Judy breaks down on stage. This event didn’t happen and the effect that it had as the theatre audience all joined in made it a bit cringey to watch, knowing that this didn’t happen in reality. Judy’s longing to be remembered and her final lines do pack a punch though as you feel the impending fate that awaits her as she dies 6 months after the concerts. There are plenty of moments in the film, particularly the Hollywood scenes, that are fantastically shot and Goold’s experience as a theatre director comes into play. His focus on the character’s expressions and use of light and shade is phenomenal and it’s exciting to see what he picks as his next cinematic project.

judy4

Now onto the star of the show. Renée Zellweger is nothing less than stellar as Judy. The Judy she plays is one that looks back on past fame and fortune whilst dealing with the reality that she does not have the same financial luxury or influence she once did. The only way she is able to keep herself financially afloat is by performing in London where her fan base is loyal. Garland is a character with many layers and Zellweger manages to communicate this with a melancholy glance. The physicality of the role may not seem demanding at first but particularly when performing, you see the physical struggles Judy has. Zellweger’s Judy is one who cares about her impact and legacy, wanting to ensure that she will be remembered. Her motivation is ensuring financial security so she can spend time with her children who are living in the US with their father, Judy’s ex-husband Sidney Luft (Rufus Sewell). There are so many scenes that are captivating and it’s mainly when she is on stage. The passion that Zellweger throws into the role is spilled out heart and soul into the songs. Offstage, Judy is disabled by her mental health and increased alcohol consumption. Her anxiety overrides everything causing a huge lack of confidence and yet she longs for validation and the applause. Her refusal to allow her younger children to enter the world of showbiz only demonstrates the hatred for her own upbringing and eventual rise to stardom. She longs for the normal life but can never truly have one now.

The supporting cast is led by Michael Gambon and Jessie Buckley as theatre owner, Bernard Delfont and assistant Rosalyn Wilder, respectively. It’s always nice to see veteran actors acting alongside rising stars and both do a wonderful job. At the end of the day, their roles are to support Zellweger’s starring turn. This is a film that has an intense focus on Judy. There are very few scenes that don’t have Judy in them meaning that this makes it hard for other people to truly shine because she does grab the attention. But as I said, in a film like this, we’re not meant to focus on these supporting roles. That being said, there is a scene between Judy and Rosalyn that is particularly fiery when the latter tries to encourage the former to go onstage. Judy lashes out and claims that Rosalyn doesn’t care about her which to an extent is true. She may seem that she does care but at the end of the day, Judy’s wellbeing comes second to her concerts. Rosalyn’s job is to ensure that Judy makes the concerts on time.

judy-garland-renee-zellweger.jpg

Judy is a film with its flaws but much like the film’s subject, it certainly puts on a show. Zellweger has made herself a serious contender this awards season and definitely could walk away with Oscar number two. I think it’s a film worth watching just for the performance but the direction should not be overlooked either. In a post #metoo world, it’s horrific and tragic to see how Judy was treated from a young age as she was verbally and physically abused and forced to fit an ideal that she did not naturally conform to. She clearly despised and reviled any attempts to change her and yet was forced to hate her background. Comparing the two Judys we see in the film, we see that culmination of abuse from all angles in Zellweger’s.

What did you think of Judy? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Adapting Roald Dahl

There are few people who manage to capture the imagination of a global audience in the way that Roald Dahl does through his stories. Over the years we have seen numerous adaptations in a wide variety of mediums and genres through the eyes of a huge spectrum of visionaries. From directors including Danny DeVito and Tim Burton and genres stemming from Mel Stuart’s musically charged classic to Wes Anderson’s progressive stop-motion animated masterpiece. The scope of adaptations made to date only adds to the genius of Dahl’s creativity and highlights the strength of the imagination the man in the shed conjured. Watching the 1971 adaptation, Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory feels just as timeless as Tim Burton’s take in 2005 despite the films bringing a polar opposite aesthetic to the novel.

Originally, I was going to try and list my favourite adaptations but much like the films of directors such as Kubrick or Paul Thomas Anderson, each one is unique for particular reasons and I found it impossible to come up with a reasonable list that sums up my love for Dahl’s stories. Netflix announced in November 2018 that they were going to adapt a number of his works and the excitement and hype ever since has been astrominical. Anne Hathaway is rumoured to have been cast as the Grand High Witch (who was brilliantly played by Anjelica Huston in the original film) in their production of The Witches. This particular remake is being directed by Robert Zemeckis to boot showing the demand around these projects.

Dahl wrote both children and adult books but is probably more known for the former. However, it was his experience and openness to discuss an array of topics (including his autobiographies Boy – Tales of Childhood and Going Solo) that allows him to approach his writing with a fearlessness, bringing a new and exciting perspective to literature. Even when creating his own universes and language, Dahl never patronises the reader and I think this is what has translated so well into the film adaptations such as Nicolas Roeg’s The Witches (1990) and Danny DeVito’s Matilda (1996). Both are great examples of films that are primarily aimed at children but are perfectly suitable for adults as well. No one is excluded from a Dahl tale. Also, the nostalgic draw also undoubtedly contributes to the hype as adults of today probably read his books as children. Dahl has become synonomous with Western (particularly British) childhoods.

I am hugely excited to see what these Netflix adaptations bring as they promise to show a more faithful and darker side to the Dahl bibliography that perhaps has been left out in previous adaptations. Not that has is a bad thing as each adaptation has brought something unique in the way that Dahl has in each of his books but it’ll be interesting to see The Witches with its original ending and a Charlie and the Chocolate Factory with the right balance of book loyalty and darkness (the Tim Burton one slightly overdoes it in my opinion). I am mainly looking forward to The BFG however as that is the one that captured me most as a child. I found the giants absolutely terrifying and I am looking forward to seeing how Netflix adapt it. I enjoyed both adaptations but I feel that the Steven Speilberg take was a bit sillier than it needed to be (although I completely appreciate that The BFG as a character is rather silly). I would probably say that if pushed to choose, my favourite films adaptations would be either Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory (1971), The Witches (1990) or Matilda (1995) which is odd because none of the films are 100% faithful but the final cut doesn’t compromise Dahl’s vision and that is the most important thing.

Which is your favourite Roald Dahl book and/or film adaptation? Let me know in the comments below!