Tag: franchise

Categories
Uncategorised

No Time To Die (2021)

No Time To Die has finally been released and is no doubt one of the most anticipated films of the year. Marking Daniel Craig’s final outing as MI6 agent James Bond, there has been a lot of excitement for this film to come out and following numerous delays, it was definitely worth the wait. Not only does this film serve as Craig’s swansong to the franchise, but we also get to see a completely different side to the character that we haven’t been shown in the film’s history. Following on from the events of 2015’s Spectre, No Time To Die sees Bond enjoying a life of retirement with Madeleine Swann (Léa Seydoux) before tragedy strikes and he is brought back into the fold as Swann’s life is at stake. The film stars a slew of familiar faces including Jeffrey Wright as Felix Leiter and Ralph Fiennes as M as well as emerging stars such as Lashana Lynch as new 007 agent, Nomi and Ana de Armas as CIA agent, Paloma. The result of which is a film that merges the past and the future of franchise in a way that makes it exciting for what direction subsequent films will take under a new Bond.

The film is directed by Cary Joji Fukunaga who does a fantastic job showing Bond’s inner turmoil as he has to deal with the conflict between wanting to retire and live his life and his moral compass which leads him to follow through with the mission. The script is written by Neal Purvis and Robert Wade who have scripted each Bond film since 1999 as well as rewrites penned by Fukunaga and Phoebe Waller-Bridge. It’s easy to see where Waller-Bridge has added her flawless touch of wit and characterisation as we see the primary and supporting characters in a different light that makes them more relatable and relevant. In particular, we see an emotional side to Bond as he begins to be seen in a familial light and not just a heart-throb who sleeps with every woman he meets. Where Bond has previously completed his missions because it is his job and the right thing to do, he actually has a personal reason to complete this one now.

Daniel Craig’s performance as Bond could arguably be his best because we see this emotional side to the character which gives Craig more to play with than he previously has done before in the franchise. What makes Craig such a memorable Bond is his impeccable delivery and believability in the character which undoubtedly has helped reinvigorate the franchise and push it into the 21st century with ease. As this is his last Bond outing, there is more emphasis on Bond as a character and specifically his interpretation of Bond which means we get to see a grittier and more violent turn of events that rounds up his tenure perfectly.

Léa Seydoux returns as Madeleine Swann and acts as the emotional anchor for Bond. Swann’s character isn’t simply to stand and look pretty, as has been the case of many Bond girls of the past, as she is given complete agency in this film. Realistically, she doesn’t have the same training or fighting skills as Bond which is understandable but we are able to see her fight back in different ways. Seydoux has become renowned for her ability to provide subtly emotional performances and No Time To Die gives her more room to play with than Spectre which is great to see.

It wouldn’t be a Bond film if there wasn’t a Bond villain and in this case, we have Rami Malek as Lyutsifer Safin, a terrorist hellbent on developing and mass-producing a bioweapon that spreads by touch. On appearance, Safin may look like the classic Bond villain but there is an intelligence that this character has that makes him unlike any villain that Bond has come across before, especially Craig’s Bond. What makes Safin such a terrifying character is that he is completely fearless which means that he is unpredictable in his actions whilst also being ruthless and seemingly heartless as well. Where Bond has managed to tap into his emotional side, Safin is incapable of doing so because he is so focused on his tragic past.

One of the main things that characterise a Bond film is its theme tune. With past performers including the likes of Shirley Bassey, Duran Duran and Adele, it was important to recruit a great performer who could capture the magic of the film and there are few artists who are more recognisable today than Billie Eilish. Eilish’s titular song mixes her signature soft vocals with a dramatic backing track that is expected of Bond films. It may seem like an odd pairing at first but the song works perfectly within the tone of the film as there is a melancholic feeling with added cinematic tones underneath. The score is composed by Hans Zimmer who was hired last minute after Dan Romer dropped out due to creative differences and he manages to merge classic Zimmer sounds with a sleek Bond feel. Pieces such as the film’s climactic scene are signature Zimmer with slow strings to draw out the emotion of the scene and allow the viewer to take in the emotions of the character perfectly while the fast action scenes feel inherently Bond and work well within the franchise. Zimmer can always be expected to do a fantastic job no matter what film he is tasked to score but it would have been wonderful to hear what Romer had in mind for the film as he has proven to be a fantastic composer who is destined for greatness.

Overall, No Time To Die is not only worth the wait, but it marks a new direction for Bond as we see 007 in a completely new light that feels exciting and refreshing. Showing that there is space for Bond in today’s world, the film thrusts Bond into modern times by incorporating representation, emotion and a complex character who is more than his well-fitted tux and charm. This is sure to be looked back fondly as a strong point in the franchise and gives Craig the ending that he deserves after a fantastic turn as one of film’s most beloved characters.

What did you think of No Time to Die? Let me know in the comments below!

No Time To Die is available to watch in cinemas now!

Categories
Uncategorised

Wrong Turn (2021)

There have been countless horror reboots, prequels and sequels released this year that have been taking the industry by storm with some proving to be successful (Candyman) and others not as much (Spiral). Regardless, revisiting classic horror franchises seems to be a way to bring that nostalgia for horror fans. However, whereas some of these films have wanted to go down a different path while still remaining similar to audiences, this year’s Wrong Turn reboot goes in the completely opposite direction. The 2003 original film sees a group of friends hunted down in the West Virginian wilderness by a small group of savage cannibals, this 2021 reboot tells a different story entirely. Boasting a similar initial synopsis, we see a group of young explorers hiking along the Appalachian Trail but this is where the similarities end as Wrong Turn changes up the culprits to incorporate social commentary and bring a new twist to the classic tale. This makes the film completely unpredictable, even to those who have watched the original, as it doesn’t follow the same plot points at all.

The film is directed by Mike P. Nelson and written by original Wrong Turn writer Alan B. McElroy. McElroy completely deconstructs his original story and changes it to something new and timely while Nelson’s direction is raw and unflinching. The result of which is a film that follows the trend of incorporating political discussion while also subverting many clichés often synonymous with this kind of film.

Charlotte Vega is cast as the film’s protagonist Jen, a woman who is unsure what she wants to get out of life. As she makes her way visiting various parts of the Appalachian Trail with her friends, Jen clearly has a desire for adventure but doesn’t know how to translate this into her professional life. Despite being surrounded by her accomplished friends, the film follows Jen as in finding a way out of the horrors, she is able to reclaim her own identity and her sense of self. Vega does a fantastic job of balancing Jen’s sense of dread with her instinctual resilience which is the driving force of the film. An important part of any horror film is making sure you have characters that can push the film along and although Jen’s character isn’t completely fleshed out as well as it could be, it’s enough to show the contrasts between the life that Jen has versus the life that she eventually leads.

Wrong Turn has an incredible support cast that really create an immersive experience and draw you into the community that has formed within the woods. In particular, Bill Sage as The Foundation’s leader Veneble is one of the film’s major highlights. Hellbent on preserving power over the community, Veneble is a great character and Sage clearly has fun with the role. His unpredictability and fearlessness means that he is a character that should be feared.

Another great supporting turn was Matthew Modine as Jen’s father, Scott and as expected, he is great. We are introduced into the film’s narrative through Scott’s perspective so it lies on Modine to draw the audience in. As we see Scott visit the small town and the tensions that arise among the locals, Modine does a great job of portraying a flawed father who is willing to anything for his missing daughter.

Overall, Wrong Turn follows the trends of using horror as a means to explore larger discussions on racial, gender and sexual identity. It is because of this that the film results in an unpredictable and unflinching look into how the setting of the film serves as a microcosm of America as we see the cultural melting pot and the subsequent clashes which often have extra gory results. For those who are unfamiliar with the Wrong Turn franchise, you don’t need to have seen any of the previous instalments as this film does a brilliant job of introducing the viewer into this world. It will be great to see if there are any sequels that follow this particular film’s narrative in the future.

What did you think of Wrong Turn? Let me know in the comments below!

Wrong Turn is available to watch on Netflix now!

Categories
Uncategorised

The Forever Purge (2021)

Another film that was postponed thanks to the pandemic was The Forever Purge. Written by series creator James DeMonaco and directed by Everado Gout, The Forever Purge has been released as the latest in The Purge series. The film follows the events of the third film, The Purge: Election Year and sees the NFFA back in power and the purge reinstated. However, things don’t go to plan and a large uprising across the US decide to implement the “forever purge” and do not stop purging after the sirens have sounded. The Purge franchise is one with a large fan base and has done well financially because of how entertaining and imaginative they are while still bringing in real issues. The Forever Purge in particular feels especially appropriate for the times we live in. If you haven’t caught up on the franchise, I have done a review and ranking of the previous films which you can read here.

What The Purge series does so well is how it incorporates real social issues into the context of the films and The Forever Purge is no exception. Showing the purge from the point of view of Mexican illegal immigrants, we see the casual racism and cruel treatment that they are subjected to as people of colour and immigrants are tracked down and killed for their background. Gout’s direction is unflinching and fantastic by clearly highlighting the differences between the affluent Tucker residence owned by a rich white family and the livelihood of their employees which includes Juan and T.T, immigrants who had to escape Mexico due to rising Cartel violence and how their security differs when the purge commences. DeMonaco’s script helps to accommodate this as he asks questions on whether the American Dream really exists. Where we see Juan and Adela flee their native Mexico and illegally enter the US as they believe they can achieve their American Dream, they are forced to try and reenter Mexico with the Tuckers when Mexico’s borders are opened for a limited time for those seeking to escape the violence. These topics of identity, social and class status are often major issues explored in The Purge films but the geographical shift sees how the event has started to grow beyond its native country.

Mexican actor Tenoch Huerta is great in the leading role as Juan. Having to deal with racism on a smaller scale in his job, he soon learns that there is a larger problem as there is systemic killings across the US with people of colour and immigrants targeted specifically. Like other main characters in The Purge films, we don’t delve deeply into Juan’s background beyond the fact that he escaped from Mexico and is trying to make an honest living in Texas but it doesn’t really matter in a film like this and it allows for a lot of surprises and freedom in the script. There are some scenes where Huerta really shines including the sudden death of a friend in which we see that dramatic range come into play. Ana de la Reguera is also great as Juan’s wife, Adela, who isn’t afraid to confront and battle alongside Juan to protect the group. The performances from both Huerta and Reguera are among the best that the whole franchise have to offer and contribute to this being one of the strongest instalments that The Purge has to offer.

In support, Josh Lucas plays the affluent Dylan Tucker who runs the family ranch and his character is given a bit more background than we’re used to from supporting characters. It’s clear from his first few scenes that Dylan has racist opinions and treats his Mexican workers differently from others as well as dismissing the idea that his daughter should learn Spanish. However, The Forever Purge shows the progression in Dylan’s character as he begins to rely on the whole group and his judgements begin to fade. What the script does well is ensure that it is done naturally and not clumsily exposed in a way that feels inauthentic.

The Forever Purge was supposed to be the last in the franchise but producer Jason Blum plans to explore the stories of other characters we’ve come across in previous films. We have seen The Purge look into issues of race and class before but this film brings it to a post-Trump era. In a world where the gap between poor and rich grows more and extremism becomes more integrated into the media and mainstream society, films like The Forever Purge are important as they hold that mirror to society and present the consequences of a fractured society and aren’t afraid to ask questions.

What did you think of The Forever Purge? Let me know in the comments below!

The Forever Purge is available to see in cinemas now!

Categories
Uncategorised

The Purge Ranking

Original horror films seem to be all the rage this century, pushing the boundaries of emotional trauma and gore. The 21st century has seen various franchises thrive such as the Final Destination series which is more geared towards a younger demographic to the Saw and Hostel series which kickstarted the “torture porn” subgenre of horror. By the 2010s, it felt as though audiences were exhausted by horror filmmakers attempting to make their films more and more unrelenting in gore and a desire for something more engaging and relevant was the way to revitalise the dwindling horror genre. Audiences were responding more to the Paranormal Activity series meaning jumpscares and found footage was proving to be more popular. Enter The Purge, written and directed by James DeMonaco, originally released in 2013 and bringing a new approach to the new outlook on horror. Set in an alternative universe where the malevolent New Founding Fathers of America (NFFA) enter office and pass a bill where crime including murder and torture is legal for 12 hours.

As one of the most divisive franchises this century, The Purge is unapologetic in incorporating current policitical issues more and more with each new film. Classicism is prominent in each film as it is abundantly clear that the rich purge on the homeless and those in more disadvantaged neighbourhoods. The rich also have access to high-tech security, ensuring that their homes won’t be damaged by anyone. Consisting of four films, a TV show and a fifth film due to be released next year, The Purge series is one that has remained popular with its audience with every release.

Here are my reviews and rankings for The Purge films:

The Purge (2013)

The original film starring Ethan Hawke and Lena Heady as the parents in a nuclear household became an understated classic on release. James Sandin (Hawke) runs a firm that designs security software that keeps the rich’s households safe during purge night. When a homeless man (Edwin Hodge) manages to sneak in thanks to their sympathetic son, Charlie, a gang of elite youths happen upon their house and demand that the Sandins give them the man. Brilliantly marketed with the creepy masks donned by the home invaders, The Purge proved to be one of the most interesting ideas in horror in quite some time. A lot of criticism for the film was a demand to see a wider scope rather than just the one suburban household. There are some pacing issues in the script and some characters weren’t as developed as I would like but I think this film was more about pushing the idea of the series than going all out in the first installment. It’s a solid start to a thriving series.

The Purge: Anarchy (2014)

This sequel was released only a year after its predecessor and gave the series a solid direction by being bigger and bolder in its discussion on the class war in America. Focusing on a struggling Latin-American family in LA, we see how those with power use the purge as a means to kidnap people against their will, knowing they don’t have the affluent resources to protect themselves. The household consist of waitress Eva (Carmen Ejogo), her daughter Cali (Zoe Soul) and her father Rico (John Beasley) who is terminally ill. There are a lot of topics just within this family that the film uses as a springboard for the rest of the franchise. From Rico sacrificing himself for money so his family are financially secure, Cali’s enthusiasm for the anti-purge resistance group led by Carmelo Johns. This film also sees the introduction of Sergeant Leo Barnes (Frank Grillo), a man set on revenge for the murder of his son who was killed at the hands of a drunk driver. Soon enough the separate groups join forces and have to work together to survive the purge whilst being stuck outside in the middle of the city.

The Purge: Election Year (2016)

The third installment in this series works its way higher up the ranks as a rising star in the political world, Senator Charlie Roan (Elizabeth Mitchell) stands a chance to win the Presidential election and end the purge once and for all. The New Founding Fathers are aware of this and eliminate the rule that government officials are immune from the purge and send a group of mercenaries to kidnap the Senator. Leading the Senator’s security detail is Leo Barnes (Grillo) who is a brilliant character. Barnes proves his resourceful abilities and intellect to protect the Senator from harm. The Senator and Sergeant soon meet a group who are trying to protect a deli from troublesome teenagers. One of the best performances to come out of this franchise is the fantastic Mykelti Williamson as deli owner, Bob. Williamson delves into his character and is able to make his supporting turn a three-dimensional experience with motivations and realism.

The First Purge (2018)

The latest installment to be released comes in the form of this prequel into the first ever purge. Originating as an experiment on Staten Island, residents are offered a financial incentive if they stay and more if they partake and survive. Following two warring drug dealers, a mysterious purger called Skeletor who wants to kill and a group of young people struggling to survive, it becomes clear that the NFFA will do anything to make sure the murder count is high, even if it means sending in mercenaries to kill citizens. The corruption in the purge is evident as it is a plan to cut costs of social programs and housing expenses for those who are poor. When they discover that there are more parties than killings, the NFFA see this as a failure and manipulate the night to ensure that it is a success in their eyes.

Well that’s it for my reviews. As a big fan of the series, there are aspects of each film that I appreciate making it a challenge to rank but here we go!

Here’s my final ranking:

1) The Purge: Anarchy (2014)

2) The Purge: Election Year (2016)

3) The First Purge (2018)

4) The Purge (2013)

Which installment of The Purge is your favourite? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Why Parasite’s win is important

Going into the 92nd Academy Awards, it seemed that pretty much every category was a lock. Joaquin Phoenix was favoured to take home the Best Actor gong for Joker, Renee Zellweger winning Best Actress for Judy and Sam Mendes was the strong favourite to win Best Director for 1917 with the latter ultimately winning Best Picture. How much the Academy surprised us then when the Best Director trophy was awarded to Bong Joon-ho for Parasite and then his film won the Best Picture award, beating the odds. Personally I was very happy as I had placed a bet on Parasite to win so there was a monetary reward for myself but the happiness goes to another more serious level. 1917 is a prime example of a quintessential award film. Don’t get me wrong, 1917 is a brilliant film that is full of revolutionary technical achievement, particularly Roger Deakins’ cinematography but it is no secret that the Academy and other Western award bodies have a love affair with war films. So much so that it has become a running joke in the film industry that to win awards, you have to make or star in a war film.

For those who are not in the know, Parasite is a Korean film exploring classism and inequality in a society that only benefits the rich and leaves those poorer to live in the gutter (quite literally). It has been the source of much hype since its premiere at last year’s Cannes Film Festival where it won the top prize, the Palme d’Or, in a rare unanimous vote, marking the first Korean film to win the prestigious award. Korean cinema is among the best in the world and has been a leading institution for years for filmmakers and film lovers and it felt like it was finally getting its due in the mainstream. Bong Joon-ho has previously delved into English-language with Snowpiercer (2013) and Okja (2017) which have become much-loved modern classics and released to acclaim; however, I think it’s poignant that Bong’s ascendance to the global audience has come from a Korean-language film that explores Korean society. It is very much detached from Western society in both its subject matter and filmmaking technique, allowing Bong to direct without the restrictions that Western studios demand. The fact that a film like Parasite, a film that is inherently unique in its style and content can beat a film like 1917 shows that there is an appetite for a different kind of film experience. It also shows a promising step forward in what audiences now expect. Naturally, franchises such as the Marvel and DC films still top the box office but Parasite concrete proof that people want more variety in the cinemas as well. Parasite’s subsequent box office success after its award wins confirms this. Now that it’s been given the chance to screen in more cinemas, it’s been able to demonstrate that there is an audience who want to watch foreign-language films, snubbing the assumption that Western audiences don’t want to watch films with subtitles.

There are many people who dismiss award season as pointless and dim, viewing it as celebrities patting themselves on the back. I don’t think it is as simple as that though. The truth is people do pay attention to awards season and follow the films that are successful. Of course, a lot of time there are the usual suspects who are nominated time and time again, sometimes undeservedly but when you have a film like Parasite that isn’t given the same chance as a mediocre English-language film then the exposure that award season brings is crucial for the film’s box office success.

Overall, there were some brilliant films this award season but Parasite was the clear standout. The fact that it won the major awards is a sign that the Academy is looking at artistic merit and not just succumbing to making it a popularity contest. Parasite’s win may not seem significant but the importance cannot be understated. Hopefully this will spark the beginning of an awards body that seeks to be more inclusive and diverse, giving all films an equal chance.

Here are my reviews for some of the films of the 92nd Academy Awards:

Winners: 1917, Joker, Jojo Rabbit, Judy, Marriage Story, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, Parasite, Toy Story 4

Nominees: A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood, Bombshell, The Irishman, The Lighthouse, The Two Popes

Snubs: Dolemite Is My Name, Hustlers, Midsommar, Uncut Gems

What did you think of Parasite’s winning streak at the Oscars? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

A Nightmare on Elm Street Ranking

If you had to ask me what my favourite horror franchise is, I would say A Nightmare on Elm Street with no hesitation. Home to Wes Craven’s iconic slasher villain, Freddy Krueger, a dream-haunting nightmare with knives for fingers on one hand. He’s disgusting and terrifying and doesn’t let his victims die easily. The first film was released in 1984 and has seen multiple sequels, a reboot and even a feature mashup with another certain horror icon. They’re not to everyone’s taste due to their extreme violence and inappropriate content but as a horror fan, I find them fun to watch. Kruegar is the first truly charismatic slasher to come from this genre as Jason and Michael Myers silently stalk and kill their prey. Freddy on the other hand likes to torment his victims and is constantly making grim jokes about their pending demise. Wes Craven has always been a skilled filmmaker but he really reached his peak with this creation. It’s brilliant and crosses the line between horror and humour. This makes the films entertaining and, dare I say, enjoyable to watch.

Now I’ve already done a ranking for the Child’s Play and Final Destination films which you can read here and here, respectively, but I thought it would be fun to look at this franchise as a whole and see where the films would slot from best to worst.

Without further ado, let’s delve into the nightmare and get on with the reviews:

A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984)

The one that started the nightmare. A Nightmare on Elm Street is a pioneer in the slasher genre, coming after Halloween (1978) and Friday the 13th (1980). Spearheaded by horror legend, Wes Craven and featuring Robert Englund as the gruesome killer, Krueger, we are plunged into a world that sees the teens of Elm Street slashed to death one by one. The film is widely known for its explicit violence, paedophilic themed subtext and also marked Johnny Depp’s film debut. A group of teens start being killed off one by one, apparently by a badly burned man with knives for fingers. Led by Nancy Thompson (Heather Langenkamp), the group work together to trap and kill the monster. It’s an iconic film. Even if you haven’t heard of it, you know what Krueger looks like and the basic premise of the film. Nancy is a brilliant protagonist and just like Laurie Strode in Halloween franchise, she is fearless when needed. It’s strange to think that a genre associated with the subjectification and glorification of violence towards women (which is a completely legitimate issue) also provides such progressive roles for women as well. There’s a humour in this film that you don’t really see in other slashers that would set a trend for franchises like Child’s Play and the sequels for Friday the 13th which purposely become weirder as the films went on.

nightmare1.jpg

A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy’s Revenge (1985)

It’s no secret that I love camp horror films. I love a film that isn’t afraid to be highly satirical of itself and the genre. Despite only being released a year before, Freddy had become somewhat of a titan of horror. A sequel was rushed through with no involvement from Craven and the result is the polar opposite of its predecessor. The film follows the Walsh family who move into the Thomson family home five years after Freddy’s initial defeat. Teenage Jesse (Mark Patton) is struggling to fit in and finds himself getting into fights with his peers at school but his world is quickly flipped when the people who . The film has become a cult classic among fans and is known for its homosexual undertones with Englund himself declaring it a “bisexual film”. There is a strong argument to suggest that Jesse’s inability to fit in is due to his conflict with his own sexuality. The big issue that I have with this film is that it flips Freddy around to be the hero. When he’s bullied by a group of partying teenagers, the audience sympathises with him. This sentiment was shared by Craven himself who stated that Freddy should be “threatening and overpowering” which I think was missing. Freddy becomes a punchline in this feature rather than a genuine threat.

A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors (1987)

This sequel does not get enough love. Coming off the failure of the previous installment, Dream Warriors is a brilliant addition to the franchise. It’s known among fans of the franchise that this film is fantastic but not as well known to horror fans in general who truthfully are missing out. Following a group of young people in a psychiatric ward, we see Freddy messing with the minds of these vulnerable individuals and watch as their pleas are quashed by the doctors and other authorities figures. The film marked Patricia Arquette’s film debut as Kristen Parker, a young teen who is chased in her dreams by Freddy who then cuts her wrists which looks like a suicide attempt to her mother who swiftly commits her to Westin Hills psychiatric hospital. She teams up with a group like her who have had nightmares of the same man and soon they are killed one by one. Calling themselves “dream warriors”, they plan to use their weaknesses as strengths to quash Freddy’s murderous attempts. The film also marks the welcome return of Heather Langenkamp as Nancy who has grown to be a psychiatrist, inspired by the events of her childhood. This film features some of the best death scenes in the franchise and sees Craven taking control of his franchise once again.

A Nightmare on Elm Street 4: The Dream Master (1988)

The film follows the remaining survivors of the third film (Tuesday Knight taking over the role of Kristen Parker) after they have been released from the psychiatric unit one year later. Kristen is still haunted by what happens and Freddy returns to cause havoc on the survivors and their school friends. This is where the films start to play the same routine and becomes more repetitive but trying to make the death scenes as ridiculous as possible. There is even a death where one of the girls is turned into a cockroach and squished! It’s still a good popcorn flick but largely unoriginal. This film also features Lisa Wilcox as new protagonist, Alice Johnson, who takes the helm as scream queen for this segment after befriending Kristen. I like the aspect of bringing someone else into the dream which is continued from the third film into this one. Freddy uses Alice to lure him to her friends who he starts to pick off one by one, including a horrific death involving her asthmatic friend. This installment was the highest grossing the original franchise and kept it that way until 2003’s Freddy vs. Jason so it was a huge hit with audiences.

A Nightmare on Elm Street 5: The Dream Child (1989)

The fifth film follows Alice (Lisa Wilcox) who is still haunted by the events of the fourth film. The opening scene throws us immediately into the dream world as we see Alice as Amanda Krueger, a nun who works in a men’s psychiatric ward who is subsequently raped by masses of inmates when she is accidentally locked among them. She has a second nightmare that sees Freddy as a baby digging up his remains from the fourth film and brings him back to life. After Alice’s boyfriend, Dan (Danny Hassel), dies tragically, Alice is convinced that Freddy is back which is swiftly followed by the revelation that she is pregnant and Freddy subsequently starts to give the unborn baby powers so he can be more like him. There is a lot going on in this film and the more I think about it, the more confused I become. There’s the usual plotline of Freddy killing teenagers then the subplot of Alice’s pregnancy and then there’s the second subplot involving Freddy’s origins. It’s a lot to cram into one film and naturally the film fails because of it.

Freddy’s Dead: The Final Nightmare (1991)

This installment is by far my least favourite. If you thought the previous film was overcomplicated then you’re not prepared for this one. Freddy has killed all the kids and teenagers in a small town and seeks out the one survivor to bring more teens to kill. There are so many questions that come to mind regarding the cannon and where this sits in the universe as there is no reason for his reincarnation from the last one. The adults in the small town have gone insane and there is definitely a strange Twin Peaks tone that they are going for that fails spectacularly. This is probably the rock bottom for the original franchise and seems to just be a money grab rather than a genuine passion project. It also features a cameo from Johnny Depp and a bizarre cameo from Roseanne Barr who plays one of the deranged townspeople.

Wes Craven’s New Nightmare (1994)

This film takes place outside the universe and is a unique experience as it is very meta. Following the making of a new film, Freddy breaks out and starts killing the cast and crew. Featuring a return from Heather Langenkamp and with many of the other parts played by cast and crew. Wes Craven returned for the project and the great thing is that it seems like everyone is genuinely having fun. It’s a shame that this film had become largely forgotten as it is a great addition to the franchise. It’s to Craven’s credit that he is always trying to think of something new while still being faithful to the originals. The Freddy in this film also goes back to darker routes and becomes less comical than the last few installments.

Freddy vs. Jason (2003)

This film is one of those that is so bad it’s great and I love it. Freddy resurrects Friday the 13th villain, Jason Voorhees in a bid to scare the residents of Elm Street while they’re awake so he can kill them while they sleep. Soon enough, Jason starts going on a killing spree which angers Freddy and the two become embroiled in a feud that brings a huge body count. It’s a fun film that ventures on the wackier side and also serves up a variety of stereotypes in an ironic way such as the resident stoner and drunk partying teens. The film is the last to feature Englund as Krueger and stars Ken Kirzinger as Jason. It’s a shame they didn’t follow this up with a sequel as it would have been great to see what more they can do with this universe cursed with this villains. It’s not a great film by any means but it’s a fun popcorn flick. I think what makes this film so enjoyable to watch ishat it isn’t afraid to poke fun at itself and be completely bonkers.

A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)

This is one of those rare films where I go against the grain a little bit. This film was (rightfully) torn apart by critics like one of Freddy’s victims despite its commercial success. It is equally hated by fans and despised so much that they didn’t even bother making any sequels for this reboot. It’s a rehash of the first film with newcomer Rooney Mara filling the boots for Nancy Thompson. The reason I go against the grain is that I am one of the few people who actually enjoyed this reboot. Don’t get me wrong, it doesn’t hold a candle besides the original at all but I thought it was an interesting take in bringing up the darker themes that couldn’t be discussed in the original, mainly Freddy’s paedophilic nature. I think Jackie Earle Healey is one of the most underrated actors working today and his performance is a darker take on Englund’s Krueger. I understand why his performance wasn’t well received because the humour and charisma is what differentiates Kruegar from other slasher villains. Also, Mara is one of my favourite actresses working today and this is the film that properly introduced me to her (aside from The Social Network but that was a small support role). I thought that the darker tone was an interesting aspect to explore but I do think ultimately the film suffers because of this and becomes just another horror film.

So that’s all of the reviews done and dusted. I am not sure if they’re going to create anymore, especially since Craven has since sadly passed, but it would be intriguing to see how they would reintroduce Freddy in this new revolutionary climate.

Here is my ranking:

1) A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984)

2) A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors (1987)

3) A Nightmare on Elm Street 4: The Dream Master (1988)

4) A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy’s Revenge (1985)

5) Wes Craven’s New Nightmare (1994)

6) Freddy vs. Jason (2003)

7) A Nightmare on Elm Street 5: The Dream Child (1989)

8) A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)

9) Freddy’s Dead: the Final Nightmare (1991)

What do you think? Which one is your favourite? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Final Destination Ranking

The franchise that was one of my first introductions to the horror genre. The Final Destination franchise is almost a passage of rite for teens and have been massively popular since the first installment dropped in 2000. The basic set-up follows a teenage protagonist and their friends on some sort of adventure or activity when the protagonist suddenly has a tragic premonition that sees their demise. The protagonist then prevents them and their friends going through with the premonition only to discover that the group starts to die violently and mysteriously one by one.

With the news that the studios have sixth and seventh installments planned for release, it made me think back on the films that helped shape my love for horror and I thought it would be a nice idea to see where they would rank.

Here are my reviews for each installment:

Final Destination (2000)

The one that started the craze. We follow recent graduate, Alex Browning (Devon Sawa) who is venturing off to Paris with his classmates. He suddenly has a graphic premonition that sees the plane explode and every passenger diminishes. Alex freaks out and is escorted off the plane along with several of his classmates. Minutes after the plane takes off, it explodes and Alex finds himself under police investigation. It doesn’t end there however as the survivors start to die one by one in violently crazy ways as death seeks its revenge. The film brings something new to the table while also paying homage to previous franchises such as the welcome cameo by Tony Todd who works as a mortician. As the film goes on, the deaths become more and more elaborate compared to his friend Tod’s demise due to strangulation to his teacher’s death sequence which saw her computer explode, followed by a knife to the chest which was pushed in by a chair. We see Alex’s descent into madness as death becomes his nemesis and he escapes to a cabin in the woods with the help of his friend Clear (Ali Larter), who believed in him from the plane accident.

FinalD1Feat-1024x660.png

Final Destination 2 (2003)

This is one of those rare franchises where the sequel is better than the original. The second installment takes the ideas from the first film and builds on them. The film follows Kimberly Corman (A. J. Cook) who has a premonition of a major road accident on a motorway that sees a huge body count. Like the previous film, she freaks out and saves herself and others only to discover that the survivors are being stalked by death. There are so many iconic sequences in this film and it’s pretty much every death. From teenager Timmy being squished by a falling window pane to the creepy ladder through eyes fiasco with young millionaire, Evan. This sequel turns up the ante and the body count. It’s gruesome and brilliant and the acting and writing is a big improvement on the first installment. It also incorporates a new theory on evading death where life can counteract death and eliminate the whole list which is an interesting twist. We also see Ali Larter return as Clear and Tony Todd reprising his cameo. I don’t care what anyone says, I have a soft spot for this film and I think the deaths are great and imaginative.

Final Destination 3 (2006)

The most famous and recognisable installment comes with the third film which features the incredible rollercoaster premonition. Starring Mary Elizabeth Winstead as Wendy in a role that would solidify her position as the 21st century “scream queen”, Final Destination 3 has an abundance of imaginative sequences that have long tortured the minds of teens alike namely the sunbed death which sees two girls trapped and burned alive by their sunbeds where the temperature has been mysteriously tampered with. If I had to rank individual performances from the whole franchise, I would probably say by Winstead is by far and large the best of the bunch. It’s a really involved performance filled with guilt and sadness. This performance is what thrusted Winstead into the spotlight where she has managed to grow into a star. It’s nice to see that happen in the modern day the same way horror made stars of  Jamie Lee Curtis (Halloween) and Patricia Arquette (A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors). It also features great support performances from Kris Lemche and Alexz Johnson as goth couple Ian and Erin who aren’t fazed by the concept of being chased by death.

The Final Destination (2009)

By far the worst installment, The Final Destination is a film that underestimated its audience and provides a film that is neither fun or memorable. The premonition takes place at a race track where a tyre flies off a speeding car and hell breaks loose. They shot this with 3D in mind and it shows. The studio was more bothered about making sure random objects and body parts are flying at you so much that they forgot to include any creativity in the process. It’s not a franchise known for its deep characterisations (nor do we expect it to be) but none of the characters are particularly likeable and they are all one note. The death sequences are predictable and elongated with some lasting way longer than necessary (the organs in the swimming pool drain being a prime example) and it soon becomes a tedious experience to watch. In a totally bizarre twist, this installment is by far the highest grossing in the series so far so Thankfully, the studios veered away from this aspect in the fifth installment.

IN03_CP04_FINAL_DESTINATION.jpg

Final Destination 5 (2011)

The fifth and latest installment of the franchise looks back to the original for inspiration and becomes more old school. After the critical failure of the fourth film, the studios reflected on what went wrong and made what is the “best” installment in the franchise. The script is actually tight and the characters are well-developed compared to the other films. The opening disaster is a road accident which sees a bridge collapse while a group of colleagues are on their way to a work retreat. It’s a simpler set-up than previous installments but the effects are brilliant and the deaths are just as gory. Like the fourth film, this was also released in 3D but it didn’t feel as though they were just catering for 3D and the use of it was interesting and minimal. It didn’t need the 3D to succeed but it did amplify the experience in the cinema. Following Sam Lawton (Nicholas D’Agosto) who has the premonition and the usual set-up of rescuing his friends. This installment has an array of theories and twists that are not overthought or complicated and works brilliantly as a franchise installment and also a standalone.

With all of this said and done, I am even more excited for the new installments to be released. I think that the Final Destination idea is really interesting and they’re great fun to watch. I’ll definitely be front and centre on release day with a box of popcorn in hand.

I think it’s a credit to the writers for the franchise that all but one of the sequels managed to surpass the original and even the film that is deemed the worst was the one that made the most at the box office. There is a huge audience for these films and it’s a shame that there’s been such a big gap between the last installment and now.

Here is my final ranking:

1) Final Destination 2 (2003)

2) Final Destination 5 (2011)

3) Final Destination 3 (2006)

4) Final Destination (2000)

5) The Final Destination (2009)

What do you think of the ranking? Do you agree or disagree? Let me know in the comments below!