Tag: directing

Categories
Uncategorised

The Two Popes (2019)

The first film I watched this decade is a surprising choice in the form of biopic The Two Popes following the conservative Cardinal Ratzinger (Anthony Hopkins) who becomes Pope Benedict XVI and his eventual friendship with the more liberal Cardinal Bergoglio (Jonathan Pryce), who later becomes Pope Francis. Directed by Brazilian director Fernando Meirelles with a script written by Anthony McCarten based on the latter’s novel The Pope, The Two Popes manages to successfully avoid falling into the trap of becoming another studio churned out biopic. There is no doubt that the two leads are the stars of the show and contribute a lot to the film’s overall acclaim but Meirelles control on the tone of the film and McCarten’s deeply intense script make The Two Popes a thrilling watch, particularly scenes when it is the two gentleman by themselves. The film’s strength comes in its constant shift in dynamic. The opening scenes follow the death of Pope John Paul II and the deciding vote on who will be his successor and the differences between the two eventual popes are crystal clear. Cardinal Ratzinger does everything in his power to become Pope and succeeds by persuading his fellow Cardinals during breaks from voting whereas Bergoglio is discomforted by the prospect of becoming pontiff. There seems to be a projected rivalry on the two men which Ratzinger seems to act on but Bergoglio is perplexed by this narrative.

The power from this film comes from the brilliant screenplay by McCarten. His script reads like a power struggle at times as the dynamic shifts between the two popes’ favour throughout. The inclusion of flashbacks and context into their histories also helps the film to avoid being just a simple story of one Pope’s decline and another’s ascension. There is no bias for either one as we are just presented with facts such as Ratzinger’s admission that he knew about the molestation within the Church before the scandal came to light. Despite the two men being a part of the same religion, they have completely different viewpoints. Ratzinger feels that resigning is the only way to seek absolution whereas Bergoglio thinks that he should remain Pope and see the scandal through to the end. Bergoglio’s upbringing and story is filled with a lot more turmoil than Ratzinger who seems to have had a more privileged upbringing. Their conflicting interests and differing politics result in Bergoglio coming across as more compassionate than Ratzinger because he is more accepting and open to change. The ending scene with the two men watching the football is funny to watch and makes for a light tone to suggest that their friendship is on good terms.

The two leads excel in their roles as expected. Jonathan Pryce is absolutely brilliant in the leading role as Bergoglio who is the quietly outspoken of the two. Constantly having to justify his stance on controversial topics that differ from the conservative Church teachings, Bergoglio is seen equally as a disgrace and a revolutionary within the Church. It comes to light that this has been the case all his life with his complicated background during the Argentinian militaria regime. Whereas Ratzinger revels in the tradition and opulence of the Catholic Church, Bergoglio is happy with what he has. He doesn’t understand why those high up in the Church live in such luxury. Pryce is perfect casting in both his appearance and his characterisation, truly becoming the future pope. You never know what he is going to do or say next because he is unpredictable. One minute he will be conversing in Latin with Ratzinger and the next he will be teaching him how to tango.

Anthony Hopkins’ performance is his best in film for years. Bringing out mannerisms subtly with an understated accent and acting that seems effortless but is really meticulous, Hopkins is fantastic as the newly elected Pope. Ratzinger is not necessarily a likeable character because he is so set in his ways and has many dated opinions that don’t fit in with the times. He is clearly a highly intelligent man and extremely well-read but also detached from modern society. In some ways Bergoglio tests him to embrace the present world more and try to adapt. We don’t see as much of Ratzinger’s background as Bergoglio’s but Hopkins gives us enough to know that he has always been a lonely figure. The scene in which Ratzinger gives Bergoglio his confession is fantastic. The audience lingers on Hopkins’ words as he reveals his difficult time growing up and being saved by God.

In terms of awards buzz, The Two Popes has garnered attention for Pryce and Hopkins’ performances. I don’t think either will win due to strong competition in both categories but they are deserved nominations. I didn’t think I would find this film particularly enjoyable but I was pleasantly surprised. The performances alone are enough to the grip the viewer but it proved to be even more. It’s not a film about religion but more of a character study about two very men who are connected because of that religion. There were many gripping scenes filled with tension as the two popes debate about various aspects of the church. I also wasn’t expecting the film to have so many funny moments as well and it doesn’t feel too heavy in subject matter. I think following it primarily from the point of view of Bergoglio was a smart choice as we see the events from both the inside and the outside depending on what is happening.

What did you think of The Two Popes? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Dolemite Is My Name (2019)

Dolemite Is My Name is a brilliant look into the life of African-American icon Rudy Ray Moore played by Eddie Murphy in a career best performance. Moore is a man of many talents: acting, singing and stand-up. His comedy routines are his way into fame as he channels an alter ego Dolemite, a pimp style man of the 70s who speaks in rhyme and quickly builds up a fan base within the African-American community across the US. The film specifically follows his rise to stardom and the production of his first film Dolemite, a blaxploitation feature in which he plays his comedic alter ego. Directed by Craig Brewer and written by Scott Alexander and Larry Karaszewski, Dolemite is my Name marks a welcome return to Eddie Murphy as a leading man on the big screen and also boasts a brilliant supporting cast with Craig Robinson, Tituss Burgess, Keegan-Michael Key and Snoop Dogg. It’s brash and upfront, unafraid of its subject and showing just how far one will go for their time in the spotlight. The writing is spectacular and even the scenes where Moore isn’t speaking in rhyme almost have a poetic quality to them. Every pause and interaction has a flow that works brilliantly in the film and the characters interact naturally. You completely believe and engage with the characters and at no point are drawn away from the film. The direction is quick and sharp with eye-catching colour palettes that exemplify Moore’s even more colourful personality. Everything about this film was completely wonderful to watch.

In a sea of biopics, it would be easy to miss this one which seemed to sneak onto Netflix without fanfare but that would be your loss. Moore is a man who loves the limelight and will do anything to get it. He will do whatever it takes to become famous even if it means nudity, violence or strong language. He isn’t afraid of vulgarity and thrives on the offensive nature of his content. Who better to play such a controversial figure than Eddie Murphy? Murphy allows himself to embrace all aspects of Moore’s personality from his strong bravado to his insecurities and flaws. He has left no stone unturned in his preparation and the result is a captivating and stunning performance that does the Moore legacy proud. I hope Murphy continues releasing films like this that show his talent and range as an actor. In this film alone, he has to sing, act and perform stand-up as a man who is himself portraying a character. That is tricky to pull off and yet Murphy seems to do this effortlessly. This is a film that has a big cast list and yet Murphy is the draw and the centre of attention at all times. There aren’t many moments when he isn’t onscreen and yet his presence is anticipated and felt. Of course, this is only natural since it is a biopic on his character but it really is a magnetic performance.

dolemite

As mentioned before, the supporting cast is crammed full of amazing talent. If I had to choose one that stands out from the rest, it is probably Keegan-Michael Key as screenwriter and actor Jerry Jones. Jones is an earnest playwright who makes films that explore racism in modern society. When initially approached by Moore to write the screenplay for the Dolemite movie, he is reluctant to jump onboard but is eventually taken in by the scope of Moore’s fanbase. His reactions during and after filming the sex scene for the movie is priceless. Jones is a character who is taken way out of his comfort and it initially makes him seem like the only sane person in a crazy bunch but eventually he allows himself to have fun with it. I also really enjoyed Craig Robinson’s appearance as Moore’s friend, Ben Taylor, who provides the theme song for the Dolemite movie. His role is only small but when he is onscreen, it’s wonderful to watch. The character of Taylor is great to watch as it shows his support from before Moore’s fame and ascension. The supporting characters really do support one another. It is a film that, although centred around one individual, tells the stories of multiple people. One touching story is Lady Reed (Da’Vine Joy Randolph) who is cheated on by her husband and doesn’t know what to do with her life. Alongside Moore, she stars in the film and joins him on the stage for stand-up. Although she is assisted by Moore, Lady Reed is strongly independent and isn’t afraid of sticking up for herself and her beliefs. The scene in which she thanks Moore for putting a plus size woman of colour onscreen allows Moore to realise that his project goes beyond entertaining people.

Although it has grabbed the attention of awards panels, particularly Eddie Murphy’s performance, it feels as though Dolemite Is My Name has been swept under the carpet. This could be due to Netflix’s loyalty to its other release, The Irishman, and so they have pushed that far more. In truth, I prefer Dolmite Is My Name as a film because it feels like something new and unique whereas The Irishman brings out what Scorsese does best but nothing that we haven’t seen before. I hope that if anything Murphy gets an Oscar nomination because it would be a real shame not to acknowledge the brilliant work he does on this film.

dolemite1

In a climate that has seen a rise in racism and extremist politics taking hold, Dolemite Is My Name is a film that is desperately needed. It is thoroughly entertaining and provides plenty of laughs but it equally holds no punches in its subject matter and isn’t afraid to explore the darker truths of society. It’s interesting to think that such a diverse figure such as Moore was renowned and accepted in the 70s but the struggle and work he had to put in to get there is testament to the struggles that African-Americans face on a regular basis. I hope that there are more films like this released in coming years as it is so important to present stories from all walks of life.

What did you think of Dolemite Is My Name? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Jojo Rabbit (2019)

One of the most controversial films to come out this awards season is Taika Waititi’s World War II comedy, Jojo Rabbit. Set in Germany during the last years of the War and follows 10 year-old Jojo Betzler (Roman Griffin Davis), a Nazi fanatic whose imaginary friend is Adolf Hitler (Taika Waititi). He lives with his mum Rosie (Scarlett Johansson) who is anti-Nazi and Jojo discovers that his mum has hidden a Jewish girl called Elsa (Thomasin McKenzie) in the attic. In true Waititi fashion, the film is full of dark humour and quirkiness galore and if you’re a fan of his previous films then you shouldn’t be disappointed. That being said, I understand the negative reaction this film received and wasn’t sure that I would find it funny myself but Waititi’s Hitler is portrayed as a spoilt and childish brat who is the butt of the joke throughout the film. We are laughing at Hitler rather than with him. I was surprised at how little Waititi is in the film and I think this is a smart choice. There is more focus on Jojo and his relationship with Elsa. Waititi’s direction and screenplay are as kooky as ever as he makes the best use of the film’s star power and big budget. It’s a film with numerous moving parts but a heavy focus on its two leads, Jojo and Elsa and does a brilliant job in showing their development.

Davis does a fantastic job as Jojo. Not only does he have brilliant comedic timing in his line delivery, but the confusion as Jojo questions his own extremist beliefs. When he first encounters Elsa, he is surprised at how normal she looks. Because of the lies spouted by Nazi officials, Jojo is convinced that she is a monster and is reluctant to trust her. He equally cannot let his mum or anyone else know that he is aware of her presence because he doesn’t want his mum to get in trouble. Immediately his fanatic morals are conflicted with personal interest and it is because of this that allows him to get to know Elsa as a person and begin to realise that he has been fed lies. There are many moments of true maturity in Jojo but he is 10 years old at the end of the day and the script reflects this. When repeating anti-Semitic remarks and insults that he has heard from Nazi adults, it doesn’t sound true because he doesn’t really understand what he is saying. Jojo begins to realise this himself as he develops feelings for Elsa and he finds it hard to justify his blinded hate when applying the mindset to an actual human. Jojo doesn’t understand why he feels the way he does but manages to do what he believes is right, even if it puts himself at risk. 

jojorabbit3.jpg

Thomasin McKenzie is one of film’s highlights as Elsa, the Jewish girl hiding in Jojo’s attic. Elsa is a secretive and feisty character who lets Jojo go off on his tangents and enjoys making fun of him and his beliefs. Eventually, she is more open to Jojo when he begins writing letters pretending to be her fiancé in Paris. She realises that there is more to him than his hatred and that he can change. Her initial scene shows her in complete defensive mode both physically and mentally as she fights with Jojo and steals his knife. She drops her guard down and stays in her hiding place less and less. McKenzie portrays the loss and gain of freedom perfectly as Elsa doesn’t know how to react when she steps outside in the final scene. It seems strange watching her stand in the street as a free woman because we have become so used to seeing her hiding. Her scenes with Johansson demonstrate her range as we see her without the bravado. Her fears for the future and admiration for Rosie come across in a few short minutes which gives us a different perspective to how she acts around Jojo. McKenzie is definitely one to watch and has a promising career ahead of her.

Leading the supporting cast is Scarlett Johansson who is spectacular in what can only be described as a fantastic year for her career. Johansson caps off a phenomenal year in film with her take on Jojo’s mum, Rosie. Rosie is confident, bonkers and brilliantly outspoken. She doesn’t allow men to treat her how they want and spends her time empowering Jojo and allowing his imagination to run off with him. She disagrees with his Nazi fantasies and spends a lot of her screen time trying to capture the child in him by acting childlike herself. The character is also one of much complexity as she misses her husband as he has been missing in Italy for two years but keeps a strong front for Jojo’s sake. In one such dramatic scene, Rosie acts as both mother and father to distinguish how each one treats Jojo. With a simple smear of ash from the fireplace, Johansson becomes Jojo’s father. Her performance in Marriage Story is more defined but this shouldn’t detract from the brilliant work that she does here. Also in support is Waititi as Hitler which is the most controversial character for obvious reasons. His Hitler is clingy and desperate for attention and adoration. Seeing him in his final scenes as a pathetic man begging a child to show him some admiration is the nail in the coffin for his character and solidifies him as the punchline. Waititi is cartoonish and a complete buffoon in this role and at times is completely over the top to the point of ridicule but that’s what makes the balance work in the film. Waititi’s Hitler is created from the perspective of a child who has viewed him from the media. Because of this, Hitler’s personality is magnified to the max.

jojorabbit1.jpg

The film was enjoyable and I liked it a lot more than I thought I would. Particularly the performances from the leads as well as the characterisation of Jojo’s best friend Yorkie (Archie Yates) who is oblivious to what is going on and isn’t at all bothered about Jojo hiding Elsa. The film doesn’t pack the same punch that Waititi’s 2016 film, Hunt for the Wilderpeople did but it’s an entertaining watch nevertheless. I’m looking forward to seeing where Waititi takes his career next and hope that Sam Rockwell is in all of his future projects.

What did you think of Jojo Rabbit? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Judy (2019)

Based on the last years and concerts of Judy Garland’s life, Judy is one of the most talked about films going into this awards season thanks to the starring turn by Renée Zellweger in the titular role. Biopics have always been a popular go-to for actors who want to subvert casting types and show their range and this seems to be no exception for Zellweger who foregoes her famed reputation as the comedic gem in Bridget Jones. As an avid fan of Judy Garland, I was really interested to see whether Zellweger pulls it off and it truly is a film that revolves around the performance and acts as an Oscar lull for the actress who has mainly stayed out of the spotlight for years. Directed by Rupert Goold, a director renowned for his theatre work with a script written by Tom Edge based on the musical The End of the Rainbow by Peter Quilter, Judy is the heartbreaking reality of a faded star who longs to stay in the spotlight but is plighted by a lifetime of abuse which finally catches up with her in the form drug and alcohol abuse. Flashbacks to her youth which see Darci Shaw play a young Garland (superbly I might add) in which she is constantly berated for her appearance whilst also experiencing harassment, forced drug use and general anxieties in terms of how she must eat and act at all times.

Goold’s direction is intensely focused on its star. When we see Judy perform for the first time, the camera never leaves her, instead focusing on each movement and mannerism that Zellweger conjures up. There is a distinct use of palette used in the film as the Hollywood scenes of Judy’s youth are bright and playful whereas the London setting for her concerts in the present day is darker and drearier. The illusion of fame has long since faded which Goold brings across. The decision to bring in events that didn’t happen in real life is something that I am unsure about. A life as eventful as Judy Garland’s isn’t in need of any fictionalisation and I feel that the inclusion of these scenes detracts from the film. The main fictionalised event was the inclusion of gay couple, Dan (Andy Nyman) and Stan (Daniel Cerqueira) who wait for Judy at the stage door and have dinner with her in their flat. I understand the inclusion of these characters as it is a way to show Judy’s support for the gay community and the performances from Nyman and Cerqueira are heartfelt and sincere. My only concern is the ending scene in which they start a singalong to “Over the Rainbow” when Judy breaks down on stage. This event didn’t happen and the effect that it had as the theatre audience all joined in made it a bit cringey to watch, knowing that this didn’t happen in reality. Judy’s longing to be remembered and her final lines do pack a punch though as you feel the impending fate that awaits her as she dies 6 months after the concerts. There are plenty of moments in the film, particularly the Hollywood scenes, that are fantastically shot and Goold’s experience as a theatre director comes into play. His focus on the character’s expressions and use of light and shade is phenomenal and it’s exciting to see what he picks as his next cinematic project.

judy4

Now onto the star of the show. Renée Zellweger is nothing less than stellar as Judy. The Judy she plays is one that looks back on past fame and fortune whilst dealing with the reality that she does not have the same financial luxury or influence she once did. The only way she is able to keep herself financially afloat is by performing in London where her fan base is loyal. Garland is a character with many layers and Zellweger manages to communicate this with a melancholy glance. The physicality of the role may not seem demanding at first but particularly when performing, you see the physical struggles Judy has. Zellweger’s Judy is one who cares about her impact and legacy, wanting to ensure that she will be remembered. Her motivation is ensuring financial security so she can spend time with her children who are living in the US with their father, Judy’s ex-husband Sidney Luft (Rufus Sewell). There are so many scenes that are captivating and it’s mainly when she is on stage. The passion that Zellweger throws into the role is spilled out heart and soul into the songs. Offstage, Judy is disabled by her mental health and increased alcohol consumption. Her anxiety overrides everything causing a huge lack of confidence and yet she longs for validation and the applause. Her refusal to allow her younger children to enter the world of showbiz only demonstrates the hatred for her own upbringing and eventual rise to stardom. She longs for the normal life but can never truly have one now.

The supporting cast is led by Michael Gambon and Jessie Buckley as theatre owner, Bernard Delfont and assistant Rosalyn Wilder, respectively. It’s always nice to see veteran actors acting alongside rising stars and both do a wonderful job. At the end of the day, their roles are to support Zellweger’s starring turn. This is a film that has an intense focus on Judy. There are very few scenes that don’t have Judy in them meaning that this makes it hard for other people to truly shine because she does grab the attention. But as I said, in a film like this, we’re not meant to focus on these supporting roles. That being said, there is a scene between Judy and Rosalyn that is particularly fiery when the latter tries to encourage the former to go onstage. Judy lashes out and claims that Rosalyn doesn’t care about her which to an extent is true. She may seem that she does care but at the end of the day, Judy’s wellbeing comes second to her concerts. Rosalyn’s job is to ensure that Judy makes the concerts on time.

judy-garland-renee-zellweger.jpg

Judy is a film with its flaws but much like the film’s subject, it certainly puts on a show. Zellweger has made herself a serious contender this awards season and definitely could walk away with Oscar number two. I think it’s a film worth watching just for the performance but the direction should not be overlooked either. In a post #metoo world, it’s horrific and tragic to see how Judy was treated from a young age as she was verbally and physically abused and forced to fit an ideal that she did not naturally conform to. She clearly despised and reviled any attempts to change her and yet was forced to hate her background. Comparing the two Judys we see in the film, we see that culmination of abuse from all angles in Zellweger’s.

What did you think of Judy? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

mother! (2017)

This is a film that you will either love or hate. There really isn’t an in between on this one. Darren Aronofsky’s mother! is a biblical retelling through the unconventional setting of a home as the sole location. Featuring Jennifer Lawrence and Javier Bardem as mother and Him, a married couple who live in a huge house built by the former while the latter works on his writing. mother is decorating the home and longs for a family but this is refused by Him, who is consumed by his own work to care about what mother wants. Compared to previous offerings by Aronofsky such as Black Swan, mother! is a literally and figuratively contained film. At no point do we lose sight of mother as we follow her perspective as chaos ensues. At first, the house seems open and spacious but this quickly shifts to a claustrophobic palace of mayhem as mother’s space is literally invaded by outsiders. When mother falls pregnant, she is forced to endure the increasing attention for her husband and the exposure that leaves no stone unturned in the house.

Directed and written by Aronofsky, mother! is a film that plays out like a mystery. Because we don’t see the outside world, we don’t know what or who will come next. This makes it one of the most shocking films to watch, especially when the first casualty plays out. Definitely one of the best filmmakers today, Aronofsky leaves the meaning of the film and his own intention to the imagination of the author. One can watch it from religious, feminist and even mental health angles. It’s a film that is left wide open for interpretation. There is a clear argument for the conflict between mankind and nature. The brutality and expressionist approach to the film can make it uncomfortable for viewers which is probably why it split critics and audiences alike. However, I was one of the viewers who was left in awe from the brilliance in every aspect.

Jennifer Lawrence draws out a brilliantly and fully dramatic performance that we haven’t seen since Winter’s Bone. In between the aforementioned and mother! there was an increased focus on characters with a comedic side with Lawrence starring in dark comedy-dramas as well as protagonist Katniss Everdeen in the Hunger Games franchise. It’s a performance that demands a lot on expression and physicality as mother is a character of few words. We see her initial comfort turn into catastrophe and panic as more and more people invade the house and ruin what she has built. Javier Bardem is yet again fantastic as the villainous Him. He is perfect at playing such a manipulative character whose motivations are inspired only by himself for himself. Him is careless and seemingly the reasonable one but even as he loses control, he cannot let go of the admiration of the visitors. Their love for him is more important than the love given to him by mother.

The supporting cast is led by Michelle Pfeiffer and Ed Harris as woman and man, respectively, who both pull off menacing performances as the initial outsiders who enter the house. Immediately, mother is discomforted and disturbed by their visit and Him’s insistence that they stay for as long as they like. Pfeiffer particularly is so magnetic and draws in a deeply sexual performance that equally disgusts and intrigues mother, who is puzzled by their lax attitude towards sex and openness in conversation. As mother observes, we see woman and man worship Him whilst simultaneously break house rules and venture where they shouldn’t.

There are so many scenes worth delving into but none left me speechless in the way that the shot following mother as the house descends into chaos did. Each room has a different form of punishment with herod (Kristen Wiig) shooting people in one and a SWAT team bursting through the windows and beating people up. Despite the increasing tension, the bloody violence still comes across as shocking and unexpected. Equally as heartbreaking is the scene that follows after mother gives birth. As we witness her descent into madness and the end product that the destruction has had on the house, the realisation that there is no way to repair what has happened is still heartbreaking. It’s a film that knows its pace and doesn’t desire to fit into the mainstream.

Overall, mother! is a film that allows Aronofsky to be experimental and reject the basic beginning, middle, end linear structure with a clear plot. I think it is a film that shows Aronofsky at his best. He has always been great at developing complex female characters with an expressionist approach to direction. He has a classical eye when it comes to inspiration and is inspired by music, art, ballet, film. He is brilliant at finding beauty in the ugly and drawing that out, contrasting what we are seeing with new ideas. This is evident in mother! as the mere inspiration and idea of seeing the Holy text contrast with the horrific events is something that hasn’t been done before.

What do you think of mother!? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Moonlight (2016)

One of the best Best Picture winners in Oscar history, Barry Jenkins’ coming of age tale follows Chiron, a young black man coming to terms with his homosexuality through three key stages in his life. Split into three segments: Little (Alex Hibbert), Chiron (Ashton Sanders) and Black (Trevante Rhodes), we follow Chiron’s ascendence from bullied child to a successful drug dealer. Sadly, the infamous confusion between the true winner of the Best Picture award when La La Land was wrongly announced. Moonlight’s win was monumental for being the first film to openly discuss themes of homosexuality as well as featuring a predominantly black cast. Aside from its record-breaking and importance in film history, it holds merit as a captivating piece of cinema with innovative direction, emotionally charged writing and characters that hold influence for the entirety of the film despite limited screen time. This is a film that will be remembered for the ages.

It’s incredible that this is Barry Jenkins’ debut feature. It is one of the best debuts in film history and caused a lot of hype going into awards season. Jenkins’ vision comes across fantastically by presenting Chiron as an outsider in his own community. This is important because Chiron’s story is ultimately about being in a minority within a minority (gay within the black community). Moonlight is made up of shorter scenes that give us a glimpse into Chiron’s life. Following Chiron limits our view of the world at large but we still get the struggles across as we see him attending high school and being badly bullied. Jenkins doesn’t feel the need to explain a character’s absence and allows this to come out naturally in the script. Jenkins co-wrote the play with Tarell Alvin McCraney based on the latter’s unperformed play, In Moonlight Black Boys Look Blue. Together they reflected on their upbringings in Miami and were able to apply their own experiences into the script to ensure that it was as real and human as can be. Because of the authenticity and the knowledge of the area and its people, Moonlight doesn’t fall into the trap of including stereotypes that are often seen in films.

The cast all do a superb job of telling Chiron’s story, particularly Mahershala Ali as Juan, a drug dealer who takes Chiron under his wing at a young age. Juan is living with his girlfriend Teresa (Janelle Monae) and the two act as surrogate parents as Chiron’s mother becomes more abusive and neglectful. Juan subverts the tropes that drug dealers are given in film. He is wise, thoughtful and considerate. More importantly, he is sensitive and completely understanding Chiron’s situation almost immediately. Despite only featuring in the first part of the film before his untimely death, Juan’s presence is felt through the film. Ali’s performance is one of tenderness and paternity. What also comes across is Juan’s confidence in himself and his identity. Jenkins is subverting stereotypes and showing a perspective that is needed and long overdue.

The score by Nicholas Britell is among the best of the century so far. The soundtrack is brilliant mix of rap, classical excerpts from composers such as Mozart and original music. The original music is truly stunning with beautiful use of single violin solos to exemplify Chiron’s loneliness. What Britell does is give a separate theme for the three Chirons we see in the film. The themes aren’t distinctly different but feel like an evolution through the film until we get to Black’s theme much like Chiron’s development and understanding of his own self. At times it feels as if the music reflects Chiron himself in the specific scenes as the pace quickens in moments of adrenaline and then eases off in moments of relaxation. Chiron and the music go hand in hand making the music an entire experience through Chiron’s eyes.

Moonlight is a film that stays with you and one that is difficult to forget. It doesn’t shy away from showing the brutality of modern society and the struggles that minorities face. Jenkins solidified himself as one to watch with this film and followed it up with the excellent If Beale Street Could Talk. Moonlight is truly in a league of its own and has brought a new voice to cinema that is needed and valid. Scenes in which Chiron is rejected by his own mother (Naomie Harris), an abusive drug-addict, are revealed bit by bit as they coincide with Chiron’s own understanding of the situation. As his mother uses homophobic slurs against him, Chiron too becomes accustomed to that way of thinking and distances himself from his desires as an adult. Moonlight is one of those films that you can watch time and time again and find something to admire while reaping in the rewards of this cinematic masterpiece. It’s not often when smaller films are exposed to high levels of publicity but Moonlight thoroughly deserves it and is such an important film to note in the way of diversity in its cast and crew, providing a new perspective and a new wave of films that make way for different cultures told by those from those cultures.

What do you think about Moonlight? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

The Shape of Water (2017)

From the incredible mind of Guillermo del Toro comes the Best Picture winning The Shape of Water, an adult fairytale following mute Eliza (Sally Hawkins) who works as a cleaner in a government lab and falls in love with a creature (Doug Jones) who is held captive for experiments. Working with various parties including her neighbour Giles (Richard Jenkins), best friend and colleague Zelda (Octavia Spencer) and scientist Robert Hoffstetler (Michael Stulbarg) Eliza seeks to break the creature out and escape with him despite the efforts from the evil Richard Strickland (Michael Shannon), the man who captured the creature in the first place. There are a lot of moving pieces in this film but that’s not to say it’s difficult to follow. It gives the film multiple layers and changing motives and sides makes it exciting to watch. The film is definitely del Toro’s best since Pan’s Labyrinth and has become an instant classic. His direction and script are beautifully sharp and consistent with the universe he wants to create. Everything has been carefully thought through from the Baltimore setting to the oceanic colour palette. It’s no coincidence that we first see Eliza in a room of deep green hues and Richard covered in bright red blood. It’s a striking visual representation of which characters are good and evil.

The characters are fantastically developed, particularly Eliza. Hawkins brings a career best as the movie loving dreamer who longs to find love. Eliza leads a simple life which we gain a glimpse of as we view her morning routine which consists of boiling eggs, running a bath and masturbating. The genius of this character is that Hawkins physicality allows Eliza to be expressive and can communicate her emotion with a simple glance. Eliza is fearless when encountering the creature. She is unfazed by the blood and threatening build of the creature and instead encourages it to get close to her so she can teach it sign language and music. One of the most intense scenes comes when she is asked where the creature is and she signs “FUCK YOU” to Strickland. The latter is naturally confused as her signing as he does not understand and it creates a truly terrifying moment as Eliza takes control of the situation. Eliza knows when to take advantage of her condition and is deeply observant of those around her. Her main development comes in the form of rejecting everyone else’s wishes and learning to do what she wants. She subverts the traditional idea of love and finds her identifying more with the creature than humans because they can communicate and understand each other in ways that Eliza can’t with other humans.

The supporting cast also perform a stellar job and there isn’t a particular highlight because everyone does a fantastic job. The support cast is male-dominated due to Eliza’s job working in a government facility in 1920s Baltimore. Working in the facility are Strickland and Hoffstetler on opposing sides of the creature’s treatment. Shannon is truly evil in his role bringing the scariest performance of his career. His presence onscreen immediately brings silence as there is an unpredictability to his character. He is strict on control and when Hoffstetler threatens the slightest bit of control, this bothers him. Stulbarg’s performance is one of tenderness and concern. He winces at the sight of violence and blood which is unusual for a man with his profession. Stulbarg’s performance is layered with multiple characters and motivations. His stance and reasoning is even more unpredictable than Strickland’s. On the other hand there are Zelda and Giles who reluctantly go with Eliza’s plans. Earning Oscar nominations for their Supporting performances, Spencer and Jenkins provide Eliza’s voice at times when she needs it. Each actor is cast perfectly as they embody their roles perfectly. Zelda and Giles are also members of minorities themselves with Zelda being black and Giles being openly homosexual. Together, the trio help to support each other in a society that is dominated by the straight white men.

Music is such a crucial part of this film as it gives Eliza a voice when she doesn’t have assistance. In scenes where she communicates with the creature, she uses a record player to convey her emotions towards him. The soundtrack is a mix of classical original score and songs from the 1920s that were used in television specials and films. Not only does it give the film it’s chronological context but it also allows del Toro to delve into his own love of Old Hollywood and push this personal perspective to the front. In terms of the score, we are treated to a fantastic selection of pieces composed by Alexandre Desplat. Just like the film, the score is a mix of genres taking mainly from fantasy by adding in the whimsy of musical and light and dark tones to reflect comedy and drama. It’s a truly captivating soundtrack and well worth the second Oscar that Desplat received.

As I have mentioned before, the cinematography is fantastic. The film is quintessentially del Toro with his distinctive use of colour and impeccable ability to build his own universes. The audience is immediately immersed from the first shot when we see Eliza’s apartment underwater as Giles narrates in a fairytale manner. What works so well is that del Toro easily merges the fantasy with the real by making his world as realistic as possible but adding whimsical qualities. There are some gory scenes in the film and as expected, del Toro doesn’t shy away from showing the audience this but it’s because of the film’s primary genre being fantasy, it doesn’t feel overwrought or overwhelming to those who don’t like horror films. The film feels suitable for any genre because the topics are so universal and the vision so distinctive.

There are few films that impact me so much immediately but after I viewed The Shape of Water, I completely fell in love with everything about it. It was wonderful seeing del Toro deliver a film that feels so personal and poignant. The film feels like del Toro’s love letter for films and the many influences such as The Creature from the Black Lagoon are really felt here.

What do you think about The Shape of Water? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Frances Ha (2012)

Watching this for the first time during university was truly revolutionary. Noah Baumbach’s film follows the titular character (played flawlessly by Greta Gerwig), a contemporary dancer who struggles to maintain a secure lifestyle in New York after her best friend Sophie (Mickey Sumner) moves out of their apartment. Filmed in black and white, stripping back the New York background in a way that feels like an homage to Woody Allen’s Manhatten, Frances Ha is witty and heartbreaking while creating a brilliantly developed character who feels real and leaves you thinking long after the credits roll. Directed by Baumbach and co-written by him and Gerwig, Frances Ha has earned its place among the great indie films of the 21st century for its mix of quick wit and improvisation. Following Frances and told from her perspective, Frances Ha is a seemingly simple film in that it doesn’t explore a specific plot but it demonstrates the struggle young people have and what they will do in order to achieve their dreams.

Frances Halladay is enigmatic and fiery. She has an array of bad habits such as smoking and bad money management but she has a passion for life and sees the magic in the everyday. This love for life is magnetic and we begin to see New York from Frances’ perspective. Her New York is an entirely different place. She has plenty of struggles but somehow she is able to bounce back and flit from place to place knowing that everything will figure itself out in the end. Despite not having a “real” plot, the film sees Frances become reliant on herself. Her initial identity is completely tied to Sophie but when Sophie moves, Frances is forced to carve her own path. She’s one of my favourite characters in film with good reason. She’s quirky, doesn’t let go off her dreams and importantly, doesn’t allow a man to dictate or motivate any action unless she wants it to. For all her flaws, Frances brings her strength subtly and isn’t aware of her own power.

Frances Ha allows a deeper focus on characters rather than plot. The natural approach the actors bring mean that the audience forgets that they are watching a film rather than a documentary. Mainly set and filmed in New York, there are also scenes that take us to Sacramento and Paris. No matter where Frances goes, she doesn’t change and the world remains just as black and white as ever. We see Frances at a turning point in her life. At 27 years old she is starting to lose a grip on her dream as a dancer and begins to understand that she will have to compromise to maintain security. Because it’s not plot driven, it feels as though the audience has stepped into this moment in her life and that there will be a big breakthrough for her but Baumbach is a grounded visualist brings a more realistic approach and finds a more believable solution.

I have touched on the cinematography before but it deserves its own observation. Baumbach’s New York feels like it doesn’t belong in a specific time or place. The decision to film in black and white definitely contributes to it but also Frances’ ability to largely avoid modern culture and do her own thing gives the film a detachment and allows it to become immersed in its own universe. The decision to make it black and white added a quirky aesthetic to the film and made it a talking point but ultimately, it is a film that relies heavily on its actors and Gerwig in particular who is in the majority of the film. Inspired by the French New Wave, the film is minimalist and brings a European style to the US. Although it doesn’t bring whistles and bells, it is contrasted by Frances’ extroverted personality. Without Baumbach or Gerwig, Frances Ha would not be the film it is and would not be the indie success that it is.

There is something that continuously draws me in with Frances Ha. Every time I watch it I notice something new whether it is a particular performance, the cinematography or the writing. It’s a film that maintains its topics and place in the mumblecore movement. As both Gerwig and Baumbach’s careers have skyrocketed to new heights with both releasing two of the best films of the year with Little Women and Marriage Story respectively, it’ll be great to see them collaborate again. Their 2015 film Mistress America which was their last collaboration was also a fun watch but for me, it is Frances Ha that remains my favourite. It’s a film that is strongly feminist and feels relatable as someone who aspires to make a living in the creative industry.

What do you think of Frances Ha? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Mustang (2015)

A gem of a film you may have missed this past decade comes in the form of this Oscar-nominated Turkish-French film. Mustang is the debut feature by filmmaker Deniz Gamze Ergüven and follows five young sisters who are forced into arranged marriages after they are caught innocently playing in the sea with male classmates. Told from the perspective of the youngest sister, Lale (Güneş Şensoy), Mustang shows the struggles of being a woman in an oppressive society, the loss of innocence and the importance of sisterhood. Ergüven’s direction and script is drawn from aspects of her own life and this authenticity and knowledge can certainly be felt. The film uses limited locations which exemplifies the situation the sisters are in. The opening scenes show them leaving school and the freedom on the beach as they play. When their activities are discovered, they are trapped within the family home and forced to practice chores expected from women such as cooking and cleaning. The house is in the middle of nowhere and the girls are allowed limited access into the town due to the shame that they brought to the family. What Ergüven does so well by showing the film from Lale’s perspective is making the space seem bigger than what it is.

All five sisters have their own distinct personalities and outlook on life. As each one is married off one by one from eldest to youngest, we view their differing circumstances. This is mostly noticeable in the wedding scene where we see the two older sisters wed their husbands. Older sister, Sonay (İlayda Akdoğan) marries a man of her own choice and dances happily but second oldest sister Selma (Tuğba Sunguroğlu) sits forlorn at the table as she is forced to marry someone she does not care for. There isn’t a heavy focus on either sister as we are viewing this from Lale’s perspective and so the attention flits between various partygoers as well as Lale’s grandmother and Uncle. The writing in this scene is absolutely phenomenal and poignant as it marks the last time the five sisters are altogether and alive. It is in the wedding scene when you realise the seriousness of the plot. It is one thing for underage and arranged marriage to be discussed but it is an entirely different scenario when you see it actually happening. Especially the aftermath scene in which Selma’s bedsheets are inspected for blood the morning after and her in-laws claim she isn’t a virgin. The life-threatening undertones make this one of the terrifying scenes in film. The protagonist of the film, however, comes in the form of the youngest sister Lale. Şensoy brings a fantastic performance that is fearless and powerful. Lale isn’t afraid of what others think nor is she afraid of angering her elders when they are in the wrong. Her natural ability to resist is evident throughout the whole film and the concluding rebellion that she carries out with her sister, Nur (Doğa Doğuşlu) only shows how brilliant a character she is.

hero_Mustang-2015

One of my favourite parts of this film is the score by Warren Ellis who does a stellar job of capturing the sisters’ struggle. It’s a quiet and soft score that grows with intensity as the time to find Lale a husband looms. It’s an underrated score by all accounts and should have brought Ellis an Oscar nomination at least. The score is such an important part of a film that can really enhance the overall experience and I think that Ellis captures the heart of the film and the bond between the sisters. The combination of classic sounds with traditional Turkish music used in the wedding scene blurs the lines between the reality and the movie.

One of the best scenes in this film comes when the sisters sneak out of the house to attend a football match where adult men are banned. They are caught on camera during the match and in a bid to avoid their Uncle from seeing, the Grandmother swiftly turns the power off. It’s a small gesture but in this moment, the audience realises that the Grandmother has her sympathies for the girls and doesn’t want them to get into any further trouble. Ironically, the football match is where the girls feel safe and have fun as they are in a stadium surrounded by fellow women and watching men as a spectacle rather than being a spectacle in a male dominated world themselves. They have regained their power as individuals with individual identities in this scene and it is empowering to watch. Another scene which is a standout for me is the downfall of middle sister, Ece (Elit İşcan) who ends up committing suicide when the pain becomes too much. After waiting to be married off, she is molested by her Uncle but keeps this from her sisters so as not to upset them. The burden becomes overwhelming and she eventually takes her own life. This moment brings the trauma from the outside world into the supposedly “safe” confines of the family home. The brief glimpse that Lale sees of her bloodied sister is all the audience see before we are whisked away for the men to get rid of the body.

mustang-clip-superJumbo

Foreign language films always bring the best out of cinema whilst seemingly pushing the envelope in ways that English-language films seem reluctant and scared. Films like Mustang help lift the lid and raise awareness on important issues without caring about their opposing sides feelings. They have a clear point of view and they are films that make the audience think. The year this came out was an extremely strong year in film as you also had the revolutionary Hunagrian Holocaust feature Son of Saul which follows life of a man subject to working the gas chambers. Son of Saul was the film deservingly selected to walk home with the Oscar on awards night but any other year and that would have easily belonged to Mustang. It is a film that brings strength and hope to its female protagonists and also sheds a light on the injustice thrust upon young women in modern society.

What do you think of Mustang? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

The Tale of the Princess Kaguya (2013)

My favourite animation of the past decade hands down belongs to Isao Takahata’s swansong which is a retelling of the Japanese folktale “The Tale of the Bamboo Cutter”. It follows a man who finds a small girl in the centre of a bamboo shoot, he picks her up and she turns into a baby and then quickly grows into a young woman in the blink of an eye. Known as Takenoko (which translates as “Little Bamboo”), the family live a life filled with finery. Takenoko is given the title Princess Kaguya and soon begins the quest to find her a husband. The only problem is that Kaguya does not want a husband. She enjoys her freedom and finds the concept of regality to be horrifyingly restrictive. The film underperformed at the box office but the critical response is overwhelmingly positive with five stars across the board. It’s a shame that this film hasn’t received the mass audience that Spirited Away did because it is such an intricate look into traditional Japanese culture whilst merging in the pressures of being a woman in a man’s world and living up to societal expectations. Its portrayal of depression is one of the most realistic and resonating in film for me, particularly the scene in which Kaguya flees the party and sheds her many kimonos. The significance of this scene cannot be discussed enough. Kaguya is dismissing the life that her parents have decided for her. Her parents are not bad people but they have confused their own wishes with their daughter’s and this is what ultimately tears the family apart. The film was released just after Hayao Miyazaki’s The Wind Rises in a double bill that hasn’t been seen since the 1988 releases for My Neighbor Totoro and Grave of the Fireflies. Just as those films are completely different in subject matter and style, the same could be said of The Wind Rises and The Tale of the Princess Kaguya.

The animation style in this film is what makes it instantly stand out in the Ghibli catalogue. Taking clear inspiration from traditional paint and ink, it veers away from your typical Ghibli and Takahata aesthetic but the result is a beautiful use of technique and colour. It feels as though the film is a fairy-tale jumping from the pages of a book. The pastel colour scheme contrasts beautifully with the strong black strokes. This truly is art in animation and a testament to Takahata’s ability to push the envelope. The film in its entirety is beautiful but the now iconic cherry blossom scene is one of the most wonderful sequences in any film. Kaguya runs and plays as the cherry blossoms fall and the result is a scene of joy and freedom. The mix of deep black outlines filled in with delicate hues of pink are simplistic but resonate the lightness and happiness that the character is feeling. The use of colour is so important in this film as it evokes both material and figurative richness. Contrast the colours of nature as Takenoko ventures in the forests as a child which excites her with the scene in which she is gifted numerous kimonos that are made of unnatural colours in rich jewel tones. Takenoko is taken aback by the gift and loves playing with the material in a scene which is just as beautiful as the cherry blossom scene.

princesskaguya1

The character of Princess Kaguya herself is deeply complex and despite her origin as a being from the Moon, is one of the most human characters brought to film. Her journey from bamboo spirit to fully fledged Princess is turbulent and challenging. Content with the humble lifestyle her Earth parents lived before inflicting delusions of grandeur upon her, Takenoko refutes the lifestyle expected of a lady in high society. She is trapped within the walls of her mansion within the city and longs for the wilderness and freedom it brings. The character is not without her flaws. She purposefully manipulates five potential suitors to cross oceans and collect tokens for her affection. She does this knowing that she doesn’t care for any of them and knowing that it isn’t possible to gain these mythical gifts. When falling into her depression, we feel for her because she doesn’t want to let her parents down and appreciates everything they have done while at the same time sacrificing her own happiness. Ultimately, she has to ask herself if her parents happiness is worth exchanging for her own and asks for the Moon to reclaim her. Kaguya is a character who knows what she wants and this progressive outlook does not fit in within a society that has a place for her.

In an unusual move for Takahata, he recruited Joe Hisaishi to compose the music for this film. Hisaishi is known for his frequent collaborations with Miyazaki and had only just delivered a stellar score for The Wind Rises. It’s a credit to Hisaishi that he worked on these scores at the same time and yet both soundtracks have their own style and identity. The score for The Tale of the Princess Kaguya deeply lies in Japanese tradition, utilising traditional instruments such as the Koto which the titular character has a natural affinity for and whimsical woodwind that really brings you into the era and setting. Hisaishi has his own distinct sound as I have discussed in previous posts but this one feels totally unique in its approach. It feels softer and more ingrained in its tradition and heritage than other soundtracks. This could be because despite its fantastical elements, it is a film that is openly set in an ancient Japanese setting.

There are many scenes which stand out in this film for me and I have discussed a few of them in this post but the one that will remain the most heartbreaking is Kaguya’s return to the Moon. It’s a poignant sequence and one that will have you crying. When the procession of beings from the Moon come to collect Kaguya, the love that she has for her parents and vice versa flows through. It’s hard to believe that a children’s film can have such a sad ending but this is Ghibli and they are not afraid to delve into darker themes. Erased of her memories on Earth, Kaguya looks back at her parents and sees their love and smiles. This smile is bittersweet because she recognises the love that they have without understanding who the love is for and what it meant to them.

princesskaguya

The Tale of the Princess Kaguya is tied with Castle in the Sky for first place as my favourite Studio Ghibli film. It’s unlike any film you have ever seen and unlike any film you probably will see in the future. It’s a glorious achievement and worthy of being Takahata’s final film. The love and care that went into this film is so evident. I truly believe that the love for this film will grow in the coming years and it will become just as admired as some of the other popular Ghibli films in the catalogue such as My Neighbor Totoro and Spirited Away. It’s a film that is not an easy watch but it is so captivating and rewarding.

What do you think of The Tale of the Princess Kaguya? Let me know in the comments below!