Categories
Uncategorised

The Father (2020)

Florian Zeller’s directorial feature debut The Father was undoubtedly subject to a lot of critical and commercial praise and emerged as a favourite among many critic’s Best Film lists going into the Oscars. Starring Anthony Hopkins as Anthony, a father who is suffering with dementia, the film follows his deterioration into memory loss and despair as other characters begin to change actors and the setting begins to change. It is a deeply harrowing film that weaves feelings of thriller into the dramatic elements of the film. With great performances all round, especially from Hopkins and Olivia Colman who plays his daughter, Anne, The Father was a regular mainstay on the awards circuit this year, receiving six Academy Award nominations and winning two with Zeller and Christopher Hampton winning Best Adapted Screenplay and Hopkins receiving the Best Actor gong in a shock win.

Zeller has been a prominent playwright winning many prestigious awards in France. The Father marks his directorial debut and its script is based on his play. What makes the film so effective is how well Zeller’s direction allows the flat to become a character in itself. As we become familiarised with every room and corridor in the flat, we begin to see the changes that Anthony notices to the point where the film plays as a thriller. Although The Father is not a horror in the traditional sense of the genre, there is something deeply horrific and disturbing about watching Anthony’s world and sense of self crumble as everything becomes more distorted and confused. The way that the script is paced and structured allows for this confusion and deterioration to be carried off successfully as scenes appear to overlap and the same dialogue occurs in different flats with different actors playing the same role. The only consistent aspect of the whole film is Hopkins playing Anthony. Everything else from the plot to the characters and the setting is subject to changes to highlight the spiral into confusion.

Hopkins’ win at the Academy Awards this year was one of the most shocking results as it had seemed that the late Chadwick Boseman was the favourite to win for his performance in Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom. However, the competition in the Best Actor race was incredibly strong and both Hopkins and Boseman gave fantastic performances. Although seeing Boseman win would have been a lovely tribute on what was a life cut tragically short, Hopkins’ achievement in The Father shouldn’t be dismissed or overlooked. There is a reason why Hopkins is often referred to as the best actor working today and it is his ability to truly become the character and his fearless approach. The character of Anthony is extremely confident in himself at the beginning but we see his many layers begin to peel away as his struggles come to light and his concept of time and self begin to dissipate. Hopkins’ ability to shift the mood with the slight change of voice or a minor physical action carries the film and lifts it from being a play performed onscreen to a cinematic experience. It’s testament to Hopkins’ career that his role in The Father is being deemed one of his best considering the calibre of his actor.

In support, we have the extremely lovable Olivia Colman playing Anthony’s daughter, Anne. Colman is always a welcome presence in any film and The Father is no exception. If you’re going to have an actor playing with someone like Anthony Hopkins, you need to make sure they can match his calibre and Colman is one of the best actresses working today and is perfect casting. Coming off her Oscar winning turn in The Favourite, Colman is phenomenal as Anne, the tortured second daughter who lives in the shadow of her deceased sister, Lucy (Imogen Poots) and having to listen to her father talk to people about how Lucy is his favourite daughter. Where Anthony is seemingly happy and content at the start of the film, Anne is the opposite. Having sacrificed the happiness of her life to look after her father, Anne’s partner, Paul receives a job offer in Paris and wants her to join him. This is the perfect opportunity for Anne to begin to live her life and step out of the shadow of her family. Colman received a slew of award nominations including an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress nomination which was great to see because she really holds her own and proves to be a stellar screen partner against Hopkins.

Composer Ludovico Einaudi has had a brilliant year as he helped bring life to Chloe Zhao’s beautiful Best Picture winner, Nomadland as well as The Father. It’s incredible how different the scores are and yet are full of Einaudi signatures that help to bring his mark to the film. The score for The Father is gentle and intense at the same time and feels like a perfect mesh between drama and thriller without being over the top or overwhelming the scenes. It’s the subtly that makes the music a perfect undercurrent that propels the scenes forward and brings those confusions to light. The music in the final scene, particularly, is stunning and it is a real shame that Einaudi didn’t receive any nomination for his efforts for either film at the Academy Awards as that would have been well deserved.

What The Father does so well in this cinematic adaptation is its ability to elevate itself from a stage production onscreen thanks to the use of the direction and performances. With a stellar script that bends all of the rules, The Father is not an easy watch by any means but it is by far one of the best films to come out of this awards season. Boasting fantastic performances by Hopkins and Colman, it may not have all of the bells and whistles that come with a lot of big blockbuster films but like Nomadland, The Father thrives in its simplicity and allows the script and characters to help bring the drama to life.

What did you think of The Father? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

The Two Popes (2019)

The first film I watched this decade is a surprising choice in the form of biopic The Two Popes following the conservative Cardinal Ratzinger (Anthony Hopkins) who becomes Pope Benedict XVI and his eventual friendship with the more liberal Cardinal Bergoglio (Jonathan Pryce), who later becomes Pope Francis. Directed by Brazilian director Fernando Meirelles with a script written by Anthony McCarten based on the latter’s novel The Pope, The Two Popes manages to successfully avoid falling into the trap of becoming another studio churned out biopic. There is no doubt that the two leads are the stars of the show and contribute a lot to the film’s overall acclaim but Meirelles control on the tone of the film and McCarten’s deeply intense script make The Two Popes a thrilling watch, particularly scenes when it is the two gentleman by themselves. The film’s strength comes in its constant shift in dynamic. The opening scenes follow the death of Pope John Paul II and the deciding vote on who will be his successor and the differences between the two eventual popes are crystal clear. Cardinal Ratzinger does everything in his power to become Pope and succeeds by persuading his fellow Cardinals during breaks from voting whereas Bergoglio is discomforted by the prospect of becoming pontiff. There seems to be a projected rivalry on the two men which Ratzinger seems to act on but Bergoglio is perplexed by this narrative.

The power from this film comes from the brilliant screenplay by McCarten. His script reads like a power struggle at times as the dynamic shifts between the two popes’ favour throughout. The inclusion of flashbacks and context into their histories also helps the film to avoid being just a simple story of one Pope’s decline and another’s ascension. There is no bias for either one as we are just presented with facts such as Ratzinger’s admission that he knew about the molestation within the Church before the scandal came to light. Despite the two men being a part of the same religion, they have completely different viewpoints. Ratzinger feels that resigning is the only way to seek absolution whereas Bergoglio thinks that he should remain Pope and see the scandal through to the end. Bergoglio’s upbringing and story is filled with a lot more turmoil than Ratzinger who seems to have had a more privileged upbringing. Their conflicting interests and differing politics result in Bergoglio coming across as more compassionate than Ratzinger because he is more accepting and open to change. The ending scene with the two men watching the football is funny to watch and makes for a light tone to suggest that their friendship is on good terms.

The two leads excel in their roles as expected. Jonathan Pryce is absolutely brilliant in the leading role as Bergoglio who is the quietly outspoken of the two. Constantly having to justify his stance on controversial topics that differ from the conservative Church teachings, Bergoglio is seen equally as a disgrace and a revolutionary within the Church. It comes to light that this has been the case all his life with his complicated background during the Argentinian militaria regime. Whereas Ratzinger revels in the tradition and opulence of the Catholic Church, Bergoglio is happy with what he has. He doesn’t understand why those high up in the Church live in such luxury. Pryce is perfect casting in both his appearance and his characterisation, truly becoming the future pope. You never know what he is going to do or say next because he is unpredictable. One minute he will be conversing in Latin with Ratzinger and the next he will be teaching him how to tango.

Anthony Hopkins’ performance is his best in film for years. Bringing out mannerisms subtly with an understated accent and acting that seems effortless but is really meticulous, Hopkins is fantastic as the newly elected Pope. Ratzinger is not necessarily a likeable character because he is so set in his ways and has many dated opinions that don’t fit in with the times. He is clearly a highly intelligent man and extremely well-read but also detached from modern society. In some ways Bergoglio tests him to embrace the present world more and try to adapt. We don’t see as much of Ratzinger’s background as Bergoglio’s but Hopkins gives us enough to know that he has always been a lonely figure. The scene in which Ratzinger gives Bergoglio his confession is fantastic. The audience lingers on Hopkins’ words as he reveals his difficult time growing up and being saved by God.

In terms of awards buzz, The Two Popes has garnered attention for Pryce and Hopkins’ performances. I don’t think either will win due to strong competition in both categories but they are deserved nominations. I didn’t think I would find this film particularly enjoyable but I was pleasantly surprised. The performances alone are enough to the grip the viewer but it proved to be even more. It’s not a film about religion but more of a character study about two very men who are connected because of that religion. There were many gripping scenes filled with tension as the two popes debate about various aspects of the church. I also wasn’t expecting the film to have so many funny moments as well and it doesn’t feel too heavy in subject matter. I think following it primarily from the point of view of Bergoglio was a smart choice as we see the events from both the inside and the outside depending on what is happening.

What did you think of The Two Popes? Let me know in the comments below!