Tag: actress

Categories
Uncategorised

Dolemite Is My Name (2019)

Dolemite Is My Name is a brilliant look into the life of African-American icon Rudy Ray Moore played by Eddie Murphy in a career best performance. Moore is a man of many talents: acting, singing and stand-up. His comedy routines are his way into fame as he channels an alter ego Dolemite, a pimp style man of the 70s who speaks in rhyme and quickly builds up a fan base within the African-American community across the US. The film specifically follows his rise to stardom and the production of his first film Dolemite, a blaxploitation feature in which he plays his comedic alter ego. Directed by Craig Brewer and written by Scott Alexander and Larry Karaszewski, Dolemite is my Name marks a welcome return to Eddie Murphy as a leading man on the big screen and also boasts a brilliant supporting cast with Craig Robinson, Tituss Burgess, Keegan-Michael Key and Snoop Dogg. It’s brash and upfront, unafraid of its subject and showing just how far one will go for their time in the spotlight. The writing is spectacular and even the scenes where Moore isn’t speaking in rhyme almost have a poetic quality to them. Every pause and interaction has a flow that works brilliantly in the film and the characters interact naturally. You completely believe and engage with the characters and at no point are drawn away from the film. The direction is quick and sharp with eye-catching colour palettes that exemplify Moore’s even more colourful personality. Everything about this film was completely wonderful to watch.

In a sea of biopics, it would be easy to miss this one which seemed to sneak onto Netflix without fanfare but that would be your loss. Moore is a man who loves the limelight and will do anything to get it. He will do whatever it takes to become famous even if it means nudity, violence or strong language. He isn’t afraid of vulgarity and thrives on the offensive nature of his content. Who better to play such a controversial figure than Eddie Murphy? Murphy allows himself to embrace all aspects of Moore’s personality from his strong bravado to his insecurities and flaws. He has left no stone unturned in his preparation and the result is a captivating and stunning performance that does the Moore legacy proud. I hope Murphy continues releasing films like this that show his talent and range as an actor. In this film alone, he has to sing, act and perform stand-up as a man who is himself portraying a character. That is tricky to pull off and yet Murphy seems to do this effortlessly. This is a film that has a big cast list and yet Murphy is the draw and the centre of attention at all times. There aren’t many moments when he isn’t onscreen and yet his presence is anticipated and felt. Of course, this is only natural since it is a biopic on his character but it really is a magnetic performance.

dolemite

As mentioned before, the supporting cast is crammed full of amazing talent. If I had to choose one that stands out from the rest, it is probably Keegan-Michael Key as screenwriter and actor Jerry Jones. Jones is an earnest playwright who makes films that explore racism in modern society. When initially approached by Moore to write the screenplay for the Dolemite movie, he is reluctant to jump onboard but is eventually taken in by the scope of Moore’s fanbase. His reactions during and after filming the sex scene for the movie is priceless. Jones is a character who is taken way out of his comfort and it initially makes him seem like the only sane person in a crazy bunch but eventually he allows himself to have fun with it. I also really enjoyed Craig Robinson’s appearance as Moore’s friend, Ben Taylor, who provides the theme song for the Dolemite movie. His role is only small but when he is onscreen, it’s wonderful to watch. The character of Taylor is great to watch as it shows his support from before Moore’s fame and ascension. The supporting characters really do support one another. It is a film that, although centred around one individual, tells the stories of multiple people. One touching story is Lady Reed (Da’Vine Joy Randolph) who is cheated on by her husband and doesn’t know what to do with her life. Alongside Moore, she stars in the film and joins him on the stage for stand-up. Although she is assisted by Moore, Lady Reed is strongly independent and isn’t afraid of sticking up for herself and her beliefs. The scene in which she thanks Moore for putting a plus size woman of colour onscreen allows Moore to realise that his project goes beyond entertaining people.

Although it has grabbed the attention of awards panels, particularly Eddie Murphy’s performance, it feels as though Dolemite Is My Name has been swept under the carpet. This could be due to Netflix’s loyalty to its other release, The Irishman, and so they have pushed that far more. In truth, I prefer Dolmite Is My Name as a film because it feels like something new and unique whereas The Irishman brings out what Scorsese does best but nothing that we haven’t seen before. I hope that if anything Murphy gets an Oscar nomination because it would be a real shame not to acknowledge the brilliant work he does on this film.

dolemite1

In a climate that has seen a rise in racism and extremist politics taking hold, Dolemite Is My Name is a film that is desperately needed. It is thoroughly entertaining and provides plenty of laughs but it equally holds no punches in its subject matter and isn’t afraid to explore the darker truths of society. It’s interesting to think that such a diverse figure such as Moore was renowned and accepted in the 70s but the struggle and work he had to put in to get there is testament to the struggles that African-Americans face on a regular basis. I hope that there are more films like this released in coming years as it is so important to present stories from all walks of life.

What did you think of Dolemite Is My Name? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Jojo Rabbit (2019)

One of the most controversial films to come out this awards season is Taika Waititi’s World War II comedy, Jojo Rabbit. Set in Germany during the last years of the War and follows 10 year-old Jojo Betzler (Roman Griffin Davis), a Nazi fanatic whose imaginary friend is Adolf Hitler (Taika Waititi). He lives with his mum Rosie (Scarlett Johansson) who is anti-Nazi and Jojo discovers that his mum has hidden a Jewish girl called Elsa (Thomasin McKenzie) in the attic. In true Waititi fashion, the film is full of dark humour and quirkiness galore and if you’re a fan of his previous films then you shouldn’t be disappointed. That being said, I understand the negative reaction this film received and wasn’t sure that I would find it funny myself but Waititi’s Hitler is portrayed as a spoilt and childish brat who is the butt of the joke throughout the film. We are laughing at Hitler rather than with him. I was surprised at how little Waititi is in the film and I think this is a smart choice. There is more focus on Jojo and his relationship with Elsa. Waititi’s direction and screenplay are as kooky as ever as he makes the best use of the film’s star power and big budget. It’s a film with numerous moving parts but a heavy focus on its two leads, Jojo and Elsa and does a brilliant job in showing their development.

Davis does a fantastic job as Jojo. Not only does he have brilliant comedic timing in his line delivery, but the confusion as Jojo questions his own extremist beliefs. When he first encounters Elsa, he is surprised at how normal she looks. Because of the lies spouted by Nazi officials, Jojo is convinced that she is a monster and is reluctant to trust her. He equally cannot let his mum or anyone else know that he is aware of her presence because he doesn’t want his mum to get in trouble. Immediately his fanatic morals are conflicted with personal interest and it is because of this that allows him to get to know Elsa as a person and begin to realise that he has been fed lies. There are many moments of true maturity in Jojo but he is 10 years old at the end of the day and the script reflects this. When repeating anti-Semitic remarks and insults that he has heard from Nazi adults, it doesn’t sound true because he doesn’t really understand what he is saying. Jojo begins to realise this himself as he develops feelings for Elsa and he finds it hard to justify his blinded hate when applying the mindset to an actual human. Jojo doesn’t understand why he feels the way he does but manages to do what he believes is right, even if it puts himself at risk. 

jojorabbit3.jpg

Thomasin McKenzie is one of film’s highlights as Elsa, the Jewish girl hiding in Jojo’s attic. Elsa is a secretive and feisty character who lets Jojo go off on his tangents and enjoys making fun of him and his beliefs. Eventually, she is more open to Jojo when he begins writing letters pretending to be her fiancé in Paris. She realises that there is more to him than his hatred and that he can change. Her initial scene shows her in complete defensive mode both physically and mentally as she fights with Jojo and steals his knife. She drops her guard down and stays in her hiding place less and less. McKenzie portrays the loss and gain of freedom perfectly as Elsa doesn’t know how to react when she steps outside in the final scene. It seems strange watching her stand in the street as a free woman because we have become so used to seeing her hiding. Her scenes with Johansson demonstrate her range as we see her without the bravado. Her fears for the future and admiration for Rosie come across in a few short minutes which gives us a different perspective to how she acts around Jojo. McKenzie is definitely one to watch and has a promising career ahead of her.

Leading the supporting cast is Scarlett Johansson who is spectacular in what can only be described as a fantastic year for her career. Johansson caps off a phenomenal year in film with her take on Jojo’s mum, Rosie. Rosie is confident, bonkers and brilliantly outspoken. She doesn’t allow men to treat her how they want and spends her time empowering Jojo and allowing his imagination to run off with him. She disagrees with his Nazi fantasies and spends a lot of her screen time trying to capture the child in him by acting childlike herself. The character is also one of much complexity as she misses her husband as he has been missing in Italy for two years but keeps a strong front for Jojo’s sake. In one such dramatic scene, Rosie acts as both mother and father to distinguish how each one treats Jojo. With a simple smear of ash from the fireplace, Johansson becomes Jojo’s father. Her performance in Marriage Story is more defined but this shouldn’t detract from the brilliant work that she does here. Also in support is Waititi as Hitler which is the most controversial character for obvious reasons. His Hitler is clingy and desperate for attention and adoration. Seeing him in his final scenes as a pathetic man begging a child to show him some admiration is the nail in the coffin for his character and solidifies him as the punchline. Waititi is cartoonish and a complete buffoon in this role and at times is completely over the top to the point of ridicule but that’s what makes the balance work in the film. Waititi’s Hitler is created from the perspective of a child who has viewed him from the media. Because of this, Hitler’s personality is magnified to the max.

jojorabbit1.jpg

The film was enjoyable and I liked it a lot more than I thought I would. Particularly the performances from the leads as well as the characterisation of Jojo’s best friend Yorkie (Archie Yates) who is oblivious to what is going on and isn’t at all bothered about Jojo hiding Elsa. The film doesn’t pack the same punch that Waititi’s 2016 film, Hunt for the Wilderpeople did but it’s an entertaining watch nevertheless. I’m looking forward to seeing where Waititi takes his career next and hope that Sam Rockwell is in all of his future projects.

What did you think of Jojo Rabbit? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Judy (2019)

Based on the last years and concerts of Judy Garland’s life, Judy is one of the most talked about films going into this awards season thanks to the starring turn by Renée Zellweger in the titular role. Biopics have always been a popular go-to for actors who want to subvert casting types and show their range and this seems to be no exception for Zellweger who foregoes her famed reputation as the comedic gem in Bridget Jones. As an avid fan of Judy Garland, I was really interested to see whether Zellweger pulls it off and it truly is a film that revolves around the performance and acts as an Oscar lull for the actress who has mainly stayed out of the spotlight for years. Directed by Rupert Goold, a director renowned for his theatre work with a script written by Tom Edge based on the musical The End of the Rainbow by Peter Quilter, Judy is the heartbreaking reality of a faded star who longs to stay in the spotlight but is plighted by a lifetime of abuse which finally catches up with her in the form drug and alcohol abuse. Flashbacks to her youth which see Darci Shaw play a young Garland (superbly I might add) in which she is constantly berated for her appearance whilst also experiencing harassment, forced drug use and general anxieties in terms of how she must eat and act at all times.

Goold’s direction is intensely focused on its star. When we see Judy perform for the first time, the camera never leaves her, instead focusing on each movement and mannerism that Zellweger conjures up. There is a distinct use of palette used in the film as the Hollywood scenes of Judy’s youth are bright and playful whereas the London setting for her concerts in the present day is darker and drearier. The illusion of fame has long since faded which Goold brings across. The decision to bring in events that didn’t happen in real life is something that I am unsure about. A life as eventful as Judy Garland’s isn’t in need of any fictionalisation and I feel that the inclusion of these scenes detracts from the film. The main fictionalised event was the inclusion of gay couple, Dan (Andy Nyman) and Stan (Daniel Cerqueira) who wait for Judy at the stage door and have dinner with her in their flat. I understand the inclusion of these characters as it is a way to show Judy’s support for the gay community and the performances from Nyman and Cerqueira are heartfelt and sincere. My only concern is the ending scene in which they start a singalong to “Over the Rainbow” when Judy breaks down on stage. This event didn’t happen and the effect that it had as the theatre audience all joined in made it a bit cringey to watch, knowing that this didn’t happen in reality. Judy’s longing to be remembered and her final lines do pack a punch though as you feel the impending fate that awaits her as she dies 6 months after the concerts. There are plenty of moments in the film, particularly the Hollywood scenes, that are fantastically shot and Goold’s experience as a theatre director comes into play. His focus on the character’s expressions and use of light and shade is phenomenal and it’s exciting to see what he picks as his next cinematic project.

judy4

Now onto the star of the show. Renée Zellweger is nothing less than stellar as Judy. The Judy she plays is one that looks back on past fame and fortune whilst dealing with the reality that she does not have the same financial luxury or influence she once did. The only way she is able to keep herself financially afloat is by performing in London where her fan base is loyal. Garland is a character with many layers and Zellweger manages to communicate this with a melancholy glance. The physicality of the role may not seem demanding at first but particularly when performing, you see the physical struggles Judy has. Zellweger’s Judy is one who cares about her impact and legacy, wanting to ensure that she will be remembered. Her motivation is ensuring financial security so she can spend time with her children who are living in the US with their father, Judy’s ex-husband Sidney Luft (Rufus Sewell). There are so many scenes that are captivating and it’s mainly when she is on stage. The passion that Zellweger throws into the role is spilled out heart and soul into the songs. Offstage, Judy is disabled by her mental health and increased alcohol consumption. Her anxiety overrides everything causing a huge lack of confidence and yet she longs for validation and the applause. Her refusal to allow her younger children to enter the world of showbiz only demonstrates the hatred for her own upbringing and eventual rise to stardom. She longs for the normal life but can never truly have one now.

The supporting cast is led by Michael Gambon and Jessie Buckley as theatre owner, Bernard Delfont and assistant Rosalyn Wilder, respectively. It’s always nice to see veteran actors acting alongside rising stars and both do a wonderful job. At the end of the day, their roles are to support Zellweger’s starring turn. This is a film that has an intense focus on Judy. There are very few scenes that don’t have Judy in them meaning that this makes it hard for other people to truly shine because she does grab the attention. But as I said, in a film like this, we’re not meant to focus on these supporting roles. That being said, there is a scene between Judy and Rosalyn that is particularly fiery when the latter tries to encourage the former to go onstage. Judy lashes out and claims that Rosalyn doesn’t care about her which to an extent is true. She may seem that she does care but at the end of the day, Judy’s wellbeing comes second to her concerts. Rosalyn’s job is to ensure that Judy makes the concerts on time.

judy-garland-renee-zellweger.jpg

Judy is a film with its flaws but much like the film’s subject, it certainly puts on a show. Zellweger has made herself a serious contender this awards season and definitely could walk away with Oscar number two. I think it’s a film worth watching just for the performance but the direction should not be overlooked either. In a post #metoo world, it’s horrific and tragic to see how Judy was treated from a young age as she was verbally and physically abused and forced to fit an ideal that she did not naturally conform to. She clearly despised and reviled any attempts to change her and yet was forced to hate her background. Comparing the two Judys we see in the film, we see that culmination of abuse from all angles in Zellweger’s.

What did you think of Judy? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

mother! (2017)

This is a film that you will either love or hate. There really isn’t an in between on this one. Darren Aronofsky’s mother! is a biblical retelling through the unconventional setting of a home as the sole location. Featuring Jennifer Lawrence and Javier Bardem as mother and Him, a married couple who live in a huge house built by the former while the latter works on his writing. mother is decorating the home and longs for a family but this is refused by Him, who is consumed by his own work to care about what mother wants. Compared to previous offerings by Aronofsky such as Black Swan, mother! is a literally and figuratively contained film. At no point do we lose sight of mother as we follow her perspective as chaos ensues. At first, the house seems open and spacious but this quickly shifts to a claustrophobic palace of mayhem as mother’s space is literally invaded by outsiders. When mother falls pregnant, she is forced to endure the increasing attention for her husband and the exposure that leaves no stone unturned in the house.

Directed and written by Aronofsky, mother! is a film that plays out like a mystery. Because we don’t see the outside world, we don’t know what or who will come next. This makes it one of the most shocking films to watch, especially when the first casualty plays out. Definitely one of the best filmmakers today, Aronofsky leaves the meaning of the film and his own intention to the imagination of the author. One can watch it from religious, feminist and even mental health angles. It’s a film that is left wide open for interpretation. There is a clear argument for the conflict between mankind and nature. The brutality and expressionist approach to the film can make it uncomfortable for viewers which is probably why it split critics and audiences alike. However, I was one of the viewers who was left in awe from the brilliance in every aspect.

Jennifer Lawrence draws out a brilliantly and fully dramatic performance that we haven’t seen since Winter’s Bone. In between the aforementioned and mother! there was an increased focus on characters with a comedic side with Lawrence starring in dark comedy-dramas as well as protagonist Katniss Everdeen in the Hunger Games franchise. It’s a performance that demands a lot on expression and physicality as mother is a character of few words. We see her initial comfort turn into catastrophe and panic as more and more people invade the house and ruin what she has built. Javier Bardem is yet again fantastic as the villainous Him. He is perfect at playing such a manipulative character whose motivations are inspired only by himself for himself. Him is careless and seemingly the reasonable one but even as he loses control, he cannot let go of the admiration of the visitors. Their love for him is more important than the love given to him by mother.

The supporting cast is led by Michelle Pfeiffer and Ed Harris as woman and man, respectively, who both pull off menacing performances as the initial outsiders who enter the house. Immediately, mother is discomforted and disturbed by their visit and Him’s insistence that they stay for as long as they like. Pfeiffer particularly is so magnetic and draws in a deeply sexual performance that equally disgusts and intrigues mother, who is puzzled by their lax attitude towards sex and openness in conversation. As mother observes, we see woman and man worship Him whilst simultaneously break house rules and venture where they shouldn’t.

There are so many scenes worth delving into but none left me speechless in the way that the shot following mother as the house descends into chaos did. Each room has a different form of punishment with herod (Kristen Wiig) shooting people in one and a SWAT team bursting through the windows and beating people up. Despite the increasing tension, the bloody violence still comes across as shocking and unexpected. Equally as heartbreaking is the scene that follows after mother gives birth. As we witness her descent into madness and the end product that the destruction has had on the house, the realisation that there is no way to repair what has happened is still heartbreaking. It’s a film that knows its pace and doesn’t desire to fit into the mainstream.

Overall, mother! is a film that allows Aronofsky to be experimental and reject the basic beginning, middle, end linear structure with a clear plot. I think it is a film that shows Aronofsky at his best. He has always been great at developing complex female characters with an expressionist approach to direction. He has a classical eye when it comes to inspiration and is inspired by music, art, ballet, film. He is brilliant at finding beauty in the ugly and drawing that out, contrasting what we are seeing with new ideas. This is evident in mother! as the mere inspiration and idea of seeing the Holy text contrast with the horrific events is something that hasn’t been done before.

What do you think of mother!? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Moonlight (2016)

One of the best Best Picture winners in Oscar history, Barry Jenkins’ coming of age tale follows Chiron, a young black man coming to terms with his homosexuality through three key stages in his life. Split into three segments: Little (Alex Hibbert), Chiron (Ashton Sanders) and Black (Trevante Rhodes), we follow Chiron’s ascendence from bullied child to a successful drug dealer. Sadly, the infamous confusion between the true winner of the Best Picture award when La La Land was wrongly announced. Moonlight’s win was monumental for being the first film to openly discuss themes of homosexuality as well as featuring a predominantly black cast. Aside from its record-breaking and importance in film history, it holds merit as a captivating piece of cinema with innovative direction, emotionally charged writing and characters that hold influence for the entirety of the film despite limited screen time. This is a film that will be remembered for the ages.

It’s incredible that this is Barry Jenkins’ debut feature. It is one of the best debuts in film history and caused a lot of hype going into awards season. Jenkins’ vision comes across fantastically by presenting Chiron as an outsider in his own community. This is important because Chiron’s story is ultimately about being in a minority within a minority (gay within the black community). Moonlight is made up of shorter scenes that give us a glimpse into Chiron’s life. Following Chiron limits our view of the world at large but we still get the struggles across as we see him attending high school and being badly bullied. Jenkins doesn’t feel the need to explain a character’s absence and allows this to come out naturally in the script. Jenkins co-wrote the play with Tarell Alvin McCraney based on the latter’s unperformed play, In Moonlight Black Boys Look Blue. Together they reflected on their upbringings in Miami and were able to apply their own experiences into the script to ensure that it was as real and human as can be. Because of the authenticity and the knowledge of the area and its people, Moonlight doesn’t fall into the trap of including stereotypes that are often seen in films.

The cast all do a superb job of telling Chiron’s story, particularly Mahershala Ali as Juan, a drug dealer who takes Chiron under his wing at a young age. Juan is living with his girlfriend Teresa (Janelle Monae) and the two act as surrogate parents as Chiron’s mother becomes more abusive and neglectful. Juan subverts the tropes that drug dealers are given in film. He is wise, thoughtful and considerate. More importantly, he is sensitive and completely understanding Chiron’s situation almost immediately. Despite only featuring in the first part of the film before his untimely death, Juan’s presence is felt through the film. Ali’s performance is one of tenderness and paternity. What also comes across is Juan’s confidence in himself and his identity. Jenkins is subverting stereotypes and showing a perspective that is needed and long overdue.

The score by Nicholas Britell is among the best of the century so far. The soundtrack is brilliant mix of rap, classical excerpts from composers such as Mozart and original music. The original music is truly stunning with beautiful use of single violin solos to exemplify Chiron’s loneliness. What Britell does is give a separate theme for the three Chirons we see in the film. The themes aren’t distinctly different but feel like an evolution through the film until we get to Black’s theme much like Chiron’s development and understanding of his own self. At times it feels as if the music reflects Chiron himself in the specific scenes as the pace quickens in moments of adrenaline and then eases off in moments of relaxation. Chiron and the music go hand in hand making the music an entire experience through Chiron’s eyes.

Moonlight is a film that stays with you and one that is difficult to forget. It doesn’t shy away from showing the brutality of modern society and the struggles that minorities face. Jenkins solidified himself as one to watch with this film and followed it up with the excellent If Beale Street Could Talk. Moonlight is truly in a league of its own and has brought a new voice to cinema that is needed and valid. Scenes in which Chiron is rejected by his own mother (Naomie Harris), an abusive drug-addict, are revealed bit by bit as they coincide with Chiron’s own understanding of the situation. As his mother uses homophobic slurs against him, Chiron too becomes accustomed to that way of thinking and distances himself from his desires as an adult. Moonlight is one of those films that you can watch time and time again and find something to admire while reaping in the rewards of this cinematic masterpiece. It’s not often when smaller films are exposed to high levels of publicity but Moonlight thoroughly deserves it and is such an important film to note in the way of diversity in its cast and crew, providing a new perspective and a new wave of films that make way for different cultures told by those from those cultures.

What do you think about Moonlight? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

The Shape of Water (2017)

From the incredible mind of Guillermo del Toro comes the Best Picture winning The Shape of Water, an adult fairytale following mute Eliza (Sally Hawkins) who works as a cleaner in a government lab and falls in love with a creature (Doug Jones) who is held captive for experiments. Working with various parties including her neighbour Giles (Richard Jenkins), best friend and colleague Zelda (Octavia Spencer) and scientist Robert Hoffstetler (Michael Stulbarg) Eliza seeks to break the creature out and escape with him despite the efforts from the evil Richard Strickland (Michael Shannon), the man who captured the creature in the first place. There are a lot of moving pieces in this film but that’s not to say it’s difficult to follow. It gives the film multiple layers and changing motives and sides makes it exciting to watch. The film is definitely del Toro’s best since Pan’s Labyrinth and has become an instant classic. His direction and script are beautifully sharp and consistent with the universe he wants to create. Everything has been carefully thought through from the Baltimore setting to the oceanic colour palette. It’s no coincidence that we first see Eliza in a room of deep green hues and Richard covered in bright red blood. It’s a striking visual representation of which characters are good and evil.

The characters are fantastically developed, particularly Eliza. Hawkins brings a career best as the movie loving dreamer who longs to find love. Eliza leads a simple life which we gain a glimpse of as we view her morning routine which consists of boiling eggs, running a bath and masturbating. The genius of this character is that Hawkins physicality allows Eliza to be expressive and can communicate her emotion with a simple glance. Eliza is fearless when encountering the creature. She is unfazed by the blood and threatening build of the creature and instead encourages it to get close to her so she can teach it sign language and music. One of the most intense scenes comes when she is asked where the creature is and she signs “FUCK YOU” to Strickland. The latter is naturally confused as her signing as he does not understand and it creates a truly terrifying moment as Eliza takes control of the situation. Eliza knows when to take advantage of her condition and is deeply observant of those around her. Her main development comes in the form of rejecting everyone else’s wishes and learning to do what she wants. She subverts the traditional idea of love and finds her identifying more with the creature than humans because they can communicate and understand each other in ways that Eliza can’t with other humans.

The supporting cast also perform a stellar job and there isn’t a particular highlight because everyone does a fantastic job. The support cast is male-dominated due to Eliza’s job working in a government facility in 1920s Baltimore. Working in the facility are Strickland and Hoffstetler on opposing sides of the creature’s treatment. Shannon is truly evil in his role bringing the scariest performance of his career. His presence onscreen immediately brings silence as there is an unpredictability to his character. He is strict on control and when Hoffstetler threatens the slightest bit of control, this bothers him. Stulbarg’s performance is one of tenderness and concern. He winces at the sight of violence and blood which is unusual for a man with his profession. Stulbarg’s performance is layered with multiple characters and motivations. His stance and reasoning is even more unpredictable than Strickland’s. On the other hand there are Zelda and Giles who reluctantly go with Eliza’s plans. Earning Oscar nominations for their Supporting performances, Spencer and Jenkins provide Eliza’s voice at times when she needs it. Each actor is cast perfectly as they embody their roles perfectly. Zelda and Giles are also members of minorities themselves with Zelda being black and Giles being openly homosexual. Together, the trio help to support each other in a society that is dominated by the straight white men.

Music is such a crucial part of this film as it gives Eliza a voice when she doesn’t have assistance. In scenes where she communicates with the creature, she uses a record player to convey her emotions towards him. The soundtrack is a mix of classical original score and songs from the 1920s that were used in television specials and films. Not only does it give the film it’s chronological context but it also allows del Toro to delve into his own love of Old Hollywood and push this personal perspective to the front. In terms of the score, we are treated to a fantastic selection of pieces composed by Alexandre Desplat. Just like the film, the score is a mix of genres taking mainly from fantasy by adding in the whimsy of musical and light and dark tones to reflect comedy and drama. It’s a truly captivating soundtrack and well worth the second Oscar that Desplat received.

As I have mentioned before, the cinematography is fantastic. The film is quintessentially del Toro with his distinctive use of colour and impeccable ability to build his own universes. The audience is immediately immersed from the first shot when we see Eliza’s apartment underwater as Giles narrates in a fairytale manner. What works so well is that del Toro easily merges the fantasy with the real by making his world as realistic as possible but adding whimsical qualities. There are some gory scenes in the film and as expected, del Toro doesn’t shy away from showing the audience this but it’s because of the film’s primary genre being fantasy, it doesn’t feel overwrought or overwhelming to those who don’t like horror films. The film feels suitable for any genre because the topics are so universal and the vision so distinctive.

There are few films that impact me so much immediately but after I viewed The Shape of Water, I completely fell in love with everything about it. It was wonderful seeing del Toro deliver a film that feels so personal and poignant. The film feels like del Toro’s love letter for films and the many influences such as The Creature from the Black Lagoon are really felt here.

What do you think about The Shape of Water? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Frances Ha (2012)

Watching this for the first time during university was truly revolutionary. Noah Baumbach’s film follows the titular character (played flawlessly by Greta Gerwig), a contemporary dancer who struggles to maintain a secure lifestyle in New York after her best friend Sophie (Mickey Sumner) moves out of their apartment. Filmed in black and white, stripping back the New York background in a way that feels like an homage to Woody Allen’s Manhatten, Frances Ha is witty and heartbreaking while creating a brilliantly developed character who feels real and leaves you thinking long after the credits roll. Directed by Baumbach and co-written by him and Gerwig, Frances Ha has earned its place among the great indie films of the 21st century for its mix of quick wit and improvisation. Following Frances and told from her perspective, Frances Ha is a seemingly simple film in that it doesn’t explore a specific plot but it demonstrates the struggle young people have and what they will do in order to achieve their dreams.

Frances Halladay is enigmatic and fiery. She has an array of bad habits such as smoking and bad money management but she has a passion for life and sees the magic in the everyday. This love for life is magnetic and we begin to see New York from Frances’ perspective. Her New York is an entirely different place. She has plenty of struggles but somehow she is able to bounce back and flit from place to place knowing that everything will figure itself out in the end. Despite not having a “real” plot, the film sees Frances become reliant on herself. Her initial identity is completely tied to Sophie but when Sophie moves, Frances is forced to carve her own path. She’s one of my favourite characters in film with good reason. She’s quirky, doesn’t let go off her dreams and importantly, doesn’t allow a man to dictate or motivate any action unless she wants it to. For all her flaws, Frances brings her strength subtly and isn’t aware of her own power.

Frances Ha allows a deeper focus on characters rather than plot. The natural approach the actors bring mean that the audience forgets that they are watching a film rather than a documentary. Mainly set and filmed in New York, there are also scenes that take us to Sacramento and Paris. No matter where Frances goes, she doesn’t change and the world remains just as black and white as ever. We see Frances at a turning point in her life. At 27 years old she is starting to lose a grip on her dream as a dancer and begins to understand that she will have to compromise to maintain security. Because it’s not plot driven, it feels as though the audience has stepped into this moment in her life and that there will be a big breakthrough for her but Baumbach is a grounded visualist brings a more realistic approach and finds a more believable solution.

I have touched on the cinematography before but it deserves its own observation. Baumbach’s New York feels like it doesn’t belong in a specific time or place. The decision to film in black and white definitely contributes to it but also Frances’ ability to largely avoid modern culture and do her own thing gives the film a detachment and allows it to become immersed in its own universe. The decision to make it black and white added a quirky aesthetic to the film and made it a talking point but ultimately, it is a film that relies heavily on its actors and Gerwig in particular who is in the majority of the film. Inspired by the French New Wave, the film is minimalist and brings a European style to the US. Although it doesn’t bring whistles and bells, it is contrasted by Frances’ extroverted personality. Without Baumbach or Gerwig, Frances Ha would not be the film it is and would not be the indie success that it is.

There is something that continuously draws me in with Frances Ha. Every time I watch it I notice something new whether it is a particular performance, the cinematography or the writing. It’s a film that maintains its topics and place in the mumblecore movement. As both Gerwig and Baumbach’s careers have skyrocketed to new heights with both releasing two of the best films of the year with Little Women and Marriage Story respectively, it’ll be great to see them collaborate again. Their 2015 film Mistress America which was their last collaboration was also a fun watch but for me, it is Frances Ha that remains my favourite. It’s a film that is strongly feminist and feels relatable as someone who aspires to make a living in the creative industry.

What do you think of Frances Ha? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Marriage Story (2019)

Finally got around to watching this one and boy, was it worth the wait. Noah Baumbach’s tale of a couple coping with the struggles and heartbreak of divorce had received a lot attention and more than deserving of the hype. Scarlett Johansson and Adam Driver play New York based married couple Nicole and Charlie Barber who are pitted against one another by their lawyers when going through their divorce. Directed and written by Baumbach and containing many signature improvised scenes in true Baumbach fashion, he truly has outdone himself with this flick and created a film that is deeply human and resonating on many levels. He does not want the audience to pick sides as each side is justified and wrong in their own ways. Both characters lay out the others’ strengths and weaknesses in the opening monologues, setting the tone for the rest of the film. The film seems more stripped back in direction than Baumbach’s previous endeavours but then this feels like his most personal project and in many respects, the most heartfelt.

Johansson and Driver bring the best performances of their careers to date and both will receive nominations for sure and stand a very good chance at bringing home Oscars. Johansson takes a break from the Marvel franchise and it seems that she revels in being Nicole, an actress who longs to return to her native Los Angeles to make TV shows and films. Nicole is deeply passionate about being an active member of the family unit, particularly when it comes to being a mum to their son, Henry. She plays with him for hours on end and constantly rewards him for completing simple and menial tasks. Driver’s Charlie on the other hand resents rewarding his son for going to the toilet and instead wants to instill maturity and push his son to do his homework and work on his skills. What both parents share is an undying love for their child and the mutual understanding that the divorce outcome must be beneficial to Henry’s needs most of all.

As Nicole’s lawyer Nora, Laura Dern is glamorous, unstoppable and manipulative. She swoops in with compliments for Nicole on their first meeting, decked out in a beautiful outfit and sky high heels that become a signature throughout. She is a hugely intimidating character who begins to create a narrative on behalf of Nicole. In the courtroom scene, Nora refuses to back down and the articulation and intelligence that Dern brings to the role is surely going to bring that overdue Oscar. Dern has always been a reliable actress, wowing time and time again but with Marriage Story, she is able command the control of the scenes that she is in. She is truly mesmerising in her speeches and empowering in her confidence.

There are many scenes in this film that caused me to pause and take in the perfection but the big one has to be Nicole and Charlie’s huge argument as they cannot agree. It’s brutal, real and incredibly improvised. What starts as neutral smalltalk soon turns into a hurtful explosion full of abuse hurled at both sides and Nicole and Charlie both rip into each other for their weaknesses and expose the problems in the marriage that had been bubbling the surface and kept from the audience until this point. This honesty soon makes way for the ridiculous as they begin to insult each other for points and it soon ends with Charlie’s meltdown in which he curse Nicole and hopes she is smited with illness before being run over and wishing she was dead. Immediately, he falls to his knees in defeat as he instantly regrets his words and the two apologise. The exhaustion of the scene radiates off the screen. Before this scene, the tension is clearly brewing but both parties delude themselves and pretend everything is ok and can be relatively normal given the circumstance but here we are presented the reason and the breaking of the foundation.

This film subverts the usual divorce storyline in that the characters do not get back together at the end. This isn’t to say it isn’t a happy ending. In fact, both characters are much happier for it and we see the positive outcome and newfound respect that the protagonists have for each other. The end scene being a breath of fresh air in the aftermath of their court session. It’s a film that you cannot help but feel affected. The realism and authentic approach makes it seem like you are watching a real marriage fall apart. The genius of Baumbach’s writing is that he makes you sympathise with one party then the other and then you end up feeling sorry for both and wanting the best for them. Nicole and Charlie have done bad things during the course of their marriage but that does not make them bad people.

I think that Marriage Story will be a film discussed for many years and has revolutionised filmmaking for streaming culture. The film does not make any attempts to blend in nor does it want to be trendy. Baumbach is simply delivering quality cinema and making it accessible for everyone. There is an audience for it and I think a simple film like Marriage Story is a perfect way to break the ice further in the same way Roma did. I would give this film some major awards, particularly for its writing and acting. It’s a well-rounded film that is truly captivating from start to end. You feel that you truly get to know Charlie and Nicole equally throughout.

What do you think of Marriage Story? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

The Irishman (2019)

A hot contender for the upcoming awards season, Martin Scorsese’s latest brings together a classic Scorsese film that boasts an epic cast, epic direction and an epic time length of 209 minutes. Despite its long running length, this is a film that demands attention throughout due to its numerous plots and characters that cross and interweave revealing layers of motivations and development. What has made this film so compelling for both audiences and critics alike is how quintessentially Scorsese it is, bringing in old and new faces while still bringing something new to the gangster genre. The film stars Robert De Niro as Frank, a delivery driver turned hitman working for local mobster Russell Bufalino (Joe Pesci) before ascending the ranks and working for bigtime union owner, Jimmy Hoffa (Al Pacino). The film also features supporting turns from Ray Romano, Anna Paquin and Stephen Graham, Scorsese goes back to what he does best, exploring the Italian mob underworld with splatters of blood (the alternative title for the film is I Heard you Paint Houses) and excessive language. Scorsese’s popularity has never really diminished but it feels as though The Irishman has resonated with its audience with its brilliant use of nostalgia, mixed with the future in the choice of producing it for streaming titan, Netflix.

Scorsese’s direction is as distinctive as ever. The films flows like the Bible epics he is inspired by and allows the masks of the characters to slip slowly as unexpected alliances are formed and relationships are broken. The Irishman may be a lower age rating in the UK than many other Scorsese offerings but don’t let that fool you into thinking it is anything less. The violence is brutal and there is blood by the bucketload. The key to this film is that The Irishman doesn’t need it and Scorsese knows this. Using present day Frank to reflect on the past gives the film its nostalgia as the audience is looking back at the days of Scorsese’s classic gangster films such as Goodfellas (1990) when they see actors like Pesci and Pacino tapping into what they do so well.

The big guess is predicting who will win the Best Supporting Actor Oscar between Pesci and Pacino. Time will tell whether voters will go for Pacino’s extroverted big time player or Pesci’s subtle plotting locally respected mobster. Either is a deserved winner but if I would have to choose between them, I would probably say Pesci as pulling off such a great performance after a long absence from acting shows his natural talent. Equally, another very real possibility is that voters are split between the two and the award actually goes to Brad Pitt for his impeccable performance in Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. All three are deserving in their own way and I think the Golden Globe will start the trend on which one starts to receive this award at the subsequent shows.

The technical aspects of this film also slot nicely into the Scorsese catalogue with quick-fire editing and a wide scope of locations. Even when the characters are on different sides of the country, it still feels as though the conflicting sides are in neighbouring rooms. One particular scene that I thought was brilliantly shot is when Frank murders a rival in a restaurant. We see him continuously move from the front of the joint to the back, firing his shots before facing his rival on the street at the back and shooting him before escaping in a getaway car.

The Irishman has proved to be Scorsese’s most accomplished film in modern times. Drawing on his strengths and knowing how to push them is expected from someone as experienced. Sure, there could have been more use of female characters as Anna Paquin is sorely underused in this film but this is a story about the 1970s male-dominated Italian American underworld. Contextually, it does make sense and who knows, maybe Martin will make a film in the future with strong female characters and try something new. In the meantime, this is a film that indulges its nostalgia whilst acknowledging its maturity. With this and Noah Baumbach’s Marriage Story being released on Netflix, it seems that streaming services are the future of film and that this isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

What did you think of The Irishman? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Hustlers (2019)

One of the most hyped films of the year comes in the form of Lorene Scafaria’s crime drama, Hustlers. Based on the New York Magazine article that follows a group of strippers who drug and con Wall Street men off their money during the 2008 recession. The film stars Constance Wu as Destiny, a former stripper who is interviewed by Elizabeth (Julia Stiles) who is conducting research for her article. Destiny reflects on her rise to the top with the help of veteran stripper, Ramona (Jennifer Lopez) and together they concoct a plan that sees them milking the Wall Street types for all they’re worth. This film could have easily slipped into a male gaze fantasy that sexualises the women and focuses on their bodies rather than their minds and motivations but luckily, with a female director and female majority clue, this film becomes a poignant reflection on the treatment of women and the recklessness of the rich who exploit the poor.

Lorene Scafaria’s direction and script is brilliant with multiple characters receiving plenty of depth and screen time all while keeping it boxed in within the interview narrative. It’s a simple technique to use to detach the audience from the dramatic events in the film. Aside from these glimpses into the future interview, the flashback follows a linear structure and shows the budding relationship between Destiny and Ramona as well as their falling out. The genius of Scafaria’s direction comes in focusing on the faces of the characters rather than their bodies. As Ramona does her opening dance, the screen flits to Destiny who looks on in awe as well as Ramona herself who clearly knows exactly what she’s doing as she writhes in a pile of money. Another brilliant scene is when Destiny grows tired of being interviewed by Elizabeth and switches off her recorder. What follows is a scene of silence to reflect that Destiny is now protected from this woman who has lived such a different life from her. Constance Wu was the perfect choice for Destiny. The difference between her as an aspiring stripper and the uncomfortable woman who has lived through the experiences at the interview is like viewing two different people. Wu doesn’t hold back in her vulnerability. Destiny is clearly a rookie at her job and to see Ramona take her under her wing rather than set her up for failure is something that a film created for the male gaze would not do. This is an authentic view of womanhood and it’s made all the more empowering knowing that it was made by a woman and features a collection of strong female characters.

hustlers1

I think it’s only right to give Jennifer Lopez her own section. The triple threat truly comes into her own as Destiny’s mentor, Ramona and has subsequently earned multiple major award nominations so far including Golden Globe and SAG nominations for Best Supporting Actress. It’s pretty inevitable that she will receive an Academy Award nomination at this point also and deservedly so. Ramona is presented as ruthless but caring, mentor and mother. She sees herself in Destiny and only wants to give her the best life that she never had. Despite her many flaws, we are drawn to Ramona and we understand why she thinks the way she does despite the danger in her plans. Her experience as a woman of colour who’s livelihood is dependant on the rich white men of Wall Street is shattered as she decides to take these matters into her own hands. Ramona understands that the only way to achieve the American Dream is to rely on oneself rather than lean on an unreliable patriarchy that is all to happy to kick those less fortunate to the curb. The audience doesn’t see Jennifer Lopez. From the first moment she appears on the screen, she is Ramona.

In terms of the supporting cast, we see Keke Palmer, Lili Reinhart, Cardi B and Lizzo popping up on the screen as fellow strippers. It’s great to see a majority collection of strong women of colour in a film that builds them up rather than knocking them down. Their lifestyle isn’t glorified but it isn’t judged either. It simply is. Cardi B was cast due to her past experience as a stripper before hitting the bigtime and Lizzo is cast due to her positive body message that she likes to convey in her music. This proves how important it was to Scafaria that the female cast have confidence and aren’t ashamed of their characters. Hustlers is a brilliant example of a film by women for women. I look forward to seeing what else Scafaria has up her sleeve as well as Lopez’s next acting ventures. It’s a film that brings a spectrum of emotions while remaining true to its message and true to the characters. Hustlers presents us with the argument that not everything is black and white and although openly flawed, the motivations are not to be glorified or judged. These are events that simply happened as a consequence of context.

cardib

The soundtrack is packed with nostalgia as we are truly thrown back to old school hits that range from Janet Jackson to Britney Spears. There’s even a cameo from Usher as the singer was reported to have visited the club. The film becomes elevated by its music. After all, it provides the literal backtrack to the women’s dance so picking the right songs is key. It is cleverly mixed with classical pieces that help to detach those scenes of adrenaline with the more hard-hitting drama. One aspect of the soundtrack that I thought was genius was not including songs by Jennifer Lopez, Cardi B or Lizzo. Despite the idea of an original collab being incredible and Oscar fodder that everyone would eat up, omitting their musical achievements outside of the film allows them to embrace the characters they are and brings the audience to a higher level of relatability and believability.

In a year that has seen many brilliant films written and directed by women, Hustlers is a great insight into the future of female cinema. If you haven’t seen this yet, I highly recommend that you do. As always, let me know what you think of Hustlers in the comments below!