Tag: actress

Categories
Uncategorised

Resident Evil: Film Ranking

With Halloween fast approaching, it’s time to think about what films you’ll be watching on Halloween night. Are you the kind of person who likes a more family friendly scare? Perhaps super gore is more your taste? Or an zombie-filled action franchise to marathon? This post is all about the latter as I will be reviewing and ranking the films in Paul W. S. Anderson’s Resident Evil series. Taking inspiration from the hugely popular video games, the Resident Evil films follows the spread of the T-virus which kills people and turns them into zombies. Engineered by the evil Umbrella Corporation, protagonist Project Alice travels around the world to put a stop to the company’s experiments.

The films are not critically well received by any means and I don’t think they’ll be competing for Oscars anytime soon but they are entertaining to watch and hugely popular with audiences. With the first film released in 2002 and the latest having been released in 2016, Resident Evil may not be among the most impactful horror franchises of all time but it is a fun little watch. Of course if you’re going to watch them then it makes sense to watch them in chronological order but I thought I would do my usual reviews and ranking. Bear in mind that this will only include the live-action films directed by Paul W. S. Anderson only so the animated films are not going to be discussed in this list.

Here are my reviews for the Resident Evil films:

Resident Evil (2002)

Resident Evil opens in the iconic mansion from the first game and follows the initial T-virus being leaked within Umbrella Corporation’s headquarters, The Hive. Following this we are introduced to protagonist Alice, who has passed out in the shower struggling with short-term memory loss. The basic plot is that Alice and policeman, Matthew, are forced to go underground to The Hive with agents to shutdown the Red Queen and retrieve the antivirus. There they are faced with death at the hands of mutated zombies and monsters. To coincide with Alice’s memory loss, the audience doesn’t learn the specific details of the leak until Alice figures it out for herself. The first installment of the franchise was met with negative critical reviews and amazing box office success which would become the regular trend for the Resident Evil films. It also features one of the most iconic sequences in the franchise with the laser corridor scene that sees the death of several agents. Also, for all of its flaws, Resident Evil proves to be an entertaining horror and has great concluding scenes when Alice is captured by Umbrella.

Resident Evil: Apocalypse (2004)

The second film shows the growth of the infection which has spread to Raccoon City, the place directly above The Hive. Also bringing game favourite Jill Valentine into the films, Resident Evil: Apocalypse is another fun inclusion to the franchise, turning up the campness and adding in Nemesis as the main villain. As well as including more features and characters from the game, Resident Evil: Apocalypse attempts to go more creative with its deaths. Sadly, it doesn’t have the same impact as its predecessor as it feels as if Anderson was trying to one-up the first film but it feels a bit too busy and a lot going on with the introduction of numerous key characters. Whereas the first film thrived from its simplicity, it feels as though Anderson has put too much on his plate with this segment. That being said, I do like that there is more faithfulness to the games in this one. Also, Jared Harris is always a welcome presence in any film and I enjoyed his performance as Dr. Charles Ashford.

Resident Evil: Extinction (2007)

The T-virus has now spread across America and shows Alice teaming up with more survivors and venturing across the Mojave Desert to reach Alaska where it is claimed there is safety. Resident Evil: Extinction sees the inclusion of zombie crows as well as Claire Redfield, Albert Wesker and the super villain Tyrant. Anderson decided to rein in the camp vibes from the previous installment and reflecting the desert setting, gives the film a grittiness and seriousness. Whereas Apocalypse felt like too much was going on, Extinction has been pared back the characters who are introduced do not overwhelm the storyline too much. Ali Larter gives a brilliant performance as Claire, a favourite character from the games and Iain Glen is also fantastic in his role as Dr. Alexander Isaacs, a scientist who created the Nemesis program and Project Alice. What makes this installment even more terrifying is that most of the action takes place during the day which is almost unheard in zombie films. It shows that there really is no stopping the zombies’ hunger and the affect this has on the remaining survivors.

Resident Evil: Afterlife (2010)

Resident Evil: Afterlife follows Alice’s ruin upon the Umbrella Corporation’s headquarters in Tokyo and her subsequent search for Arcadia, a safe haven for survivors. As expected, her plan goes awry and she is faced with crowds of zombies and monsters. I have a soft spot for this film because I went to see it in the cinema in 3D and it was a brilliant experience. Usually 3D films aren’t worth the money, particularly when they were being released 10 years ago, but this was fantastic. As Alice teams up with a group of survivors including Claire in a bid to get to Arcadia, they are trapped in a building surrounded by hoards of zombies as well as a giant monster called Axeman. Taking inspiration from the Resident Evil 5 villain The Executioner, the Axeman is one of the best monsters in the whole franchise and the fight between him and Alice and Claire is among the best choreographed. I know this is one of the worst reviewed of the franchise (which is saying a lot since they are all received pretty negatively) but the fun experience I had seeing it in 3D at the cinema leaves it higher than expected on my list. I find it thrilling and entertaining and think it is definitely a crowd pleaser.

Resident Evil: Retribution (2012)

Directly following the conclusion of the fourth film, Resident Evil: Retribution shows Alice’s capture and escape from Umbrella Corporation through their simulators which have various sets and clones of old and new characters alike. We are also introduced to the last bunch of game characters that haven’t been put into the films with Leon S. Kennedy, Ada Wong and Barry Burton entering the film franchise. Showing Umbrella’s elaborate simulations as well as vigorous torture techniques on Alice, Umbrella shows no signs of slowing down. The T-virus has become a valuable asset on the market as countries purchase it to use it on their enemies to spread the outbreak. Showing the outbreak on a global level, Alice now has to fight alongside Ada and Leon and venture to the Deep North to put an end to their testing facility. On top of this, Alice must find a way to stop Jill who has been brainwashed by Umbrella. The film brings in more aspects of the game and Anderson has shot the film to resemble the videogames. Bringing back some much-loved characters including Michelle Rodriguez as Rain, Resident Evil: Retribution feels like a great combination of what fans love about the series.

Resident Evil: The Final Chapter (2016)

The final installment of Anderson’s Resident Evil films follows Alice’s last stand against the Umbrella Corporation once and for all. It takes them back to the ruins of Raccoon City and into The Hive. Teaming up with the Red Queen to stop Wesker and Dr. Isaacs from wiping out humanity, Alice has to journey from Washington to the Hive within 48 hours before Umbrella destroys all human settlements. The series feels like it has come full circle in that the Hive is where it began and ends but equally, the virus’ affect on humanity has been catastrophic. Down to the last 4,000 humans, Alice is captured by Dr. Isaacs and has to escape and meet up with fellow survivors who are living within a guarded compound in Raccoon City. Rounding off the series in style, Anderson brings back plenty of old faces that we have missed as well as some new bad guys to wince at. One cannot help but also notice Alice’s growth from the first film. Milla Jovovich’s portrayal has matured during the franchises 14 year tenure and it’s nice that Anderson and Jovovich were able to give the series the ending they wanted.

So with all the reviews done and dusted, I do think it is a franchise that gets better and more faithful to the games as it goes on. Needless to say, regardless of whether they are good films critically or not, they do a great job at entertaining the audience. Anderson’s films may have their flaws but his passion for bringing videogames to life have helped propel this series to an iconic status among videogame adaptations. They’re among the first horror films I watched and I’ll always have a soft spot for them. Even though there are horrors that I think are better, they introduced me to a genre that has become one of my favourites over the years.

Here is my ranking of the Resident Evil series:

1) Resident Evil (2002)

2) Resident Evil: The Final Chapter (2016)

3) Resident Evil: Retribution (2012)

4) Resident Evil: Afterlife (2010)

5) Resident Evil: Extinction (2007)

6) Resident Evil: Apocalypse (2004)

What do you think of my ranking? Which Resident Evil film is your favourite? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

London Film Festival 2020: Roundup

With London Film Festival concluding today and all of my reviews done and dusted, I thought I would write this post to roundup my experience. Being my first film festival, I was so excited to be apart of something I have been a fan of for years. Looking at the lineup, it seemed that there were four major films: Steve McQueen’s Mangrove, Chloe Zhao’s Nomadland, Pete Docter’s Soul and Francis Lee’s Ammonite and I was determined to see at least two of these. Luckily I was able to see Mangrove and Ammonite on the screenings but sadly wasn’t successful in the ballot to see Nomadland and I don’t live in London to see Soul. However, I was thrilled with all the films I watched. I decided that my target was to watch 10 films and make them as varied as I could. In total, I watched 12 films and this includes documentaries, shorts, animation, drama, horror, foreign language, etc. There wasn’t one film that disappointed me and many standouts that I hope go on to receive award recognition and open new doors to create more films.

Overall, what stood out to me was the quality of the writing in the films I watched which was absolutely fantastic. The creativity and originality of the films I watched shows that the industry isn’t failing and there is room for films that push boundaries. From adaptations to original pieces, each film was so distinctive and unique that I was so pleased with how many well-rounded characters there were.

I thought it would be fun to come up with my personal winners from the Festival from the films I watched. As I previously said, there were no disappointments so this will be tricky. I have also added a special Shoutout category because the winner of this gave two brilliant performances and has clearly had a stellar year. I wanted to recognise this with their own special category.

Here are the Smaller Pictures Winners of London Film Festival:

Best Picture – Wolfwalkers

Best Director – Tomm Moore and Ross Stewart for Wolfwalkers

Best Leading Actor – Riz Ahmed for Mogul Mowgli

Best Leading Actress – Tilda Swinton for The Human Voice

Best Supporting Actor – Fazlur Rahman Babu for The Salt in Our Waters (Nonajoler Kabbo)

Best Supporting Actress – Letitia Wright for Mangrove

Best Original Screenplay – Will Collins for Wolfwalkers

Best Adapted Screenplay – Pedro Almodóvar for The Human Voice

Best Documentary Feature – One Man and His Shoes

Best Original Score – Jim Williams for Possessor

Best Song – “Running with the Wolves”, AURORA from Wolfwalkers

Best Cinematography – Stéphane Fontaine for Ammonite

Best Editing – Matthew Hannam for Possessor

Best Production Design – Tomm Moore, Ross Stewart and Maria Pareja for Wolfwalkers

Best Costume Design – Michael O’Connor for Ammonite

Best Hair and Makeup – The Human Voice

Special Shoutout Winner – Sean Bean for Wolfwalkers and Possessor

London Film Festival has given me some amazing memories and been a highlight of my year and a brilliant opportunity that I am so grateful for. I am also so excited to announce that I will be reviewing films from the upcoming Raindance Film Festival at the end of this month so my Festival journey hasn’t ended just yet!

So that’s it for my little awards section and roundup! Which film are you looking forward to seeing the most? Let me know in the comments below!

Just in case you want to read my reviews for the films, I have included them below. I really recommend watching all of them:

Ammonite

Farewell Amor

Herself

The Human Voice

Lovers Rock

Mangrove

Mogul Mowgli

One Man and His Shoes

Possessor

The Salt in Our Waters (Nonajoler Kabbo)

Siberia

Wolfwalkers

Categories
Uncategorised

London Film Festival 2020: Herself

Clare Dunne and Molly McCann appear in Herself by Phyllida Lloyd, an official selection of the Premieres program at the 2020 Sundance Film Festival. Courtesy of Sundance Institute. All photos are copyrighted and may be used by press only for the purpose of news or editorial coverage of Sundance Institute programs. Photos must be accompanied by a credit to the photographer and/or 'Courtesy of Sundance Institute.' Unauthorized use, alteration, reproduction or sale of logos and/or photos is strictly prohibited.

Day 2 of London Film Festival proved to be a little busier than my first as I had not one but two films to watch back-to-back. The first of these was Herself, directed by Phyllida Lloyd, starring Claire Dunne and Harriet Walter with an original script written by Dunne and Malcolm Campbell. The film revolves around Sandra (Dunne), a victim of domestic abuse, who sets out to build her own house for herself and her girls. Working two jobs, dealing with the council and assessments, taking the girls to visit their dad and gathering a team for the house, Herself shows what can happen when you put your mind to something and never give up. It’s a brilliant film that looks at the treatment of domestic abuse in Ireland as well as the housing crisis.

The film opens with Sandra and her girls having lots of fun together, doing make-up and singing songs. This happiness is shattered when Sandra’s abusive ex, Gary (Ian Lloyd Anderson), turns up and attacks her brutally. It is a difficult scene to watch because of its realistic approach and refusal to hide the horrors. What follows is Sandra’s struggle to find a house to rent. As Gary goes to live at his parents house, Sandra and the girls are forced to live in a hotel while she waits on the housing list. The script is wonderfully written and really allows the audience to see Sandra’s struggle beneath the surface. What makes Herself a standout is its resonance and the erratic shift in tone. Just as could be expected, Sandra’s life could be stable one minute and collapse like a house of cards the next. The script does a good job of building up the struggle with the final act resulting in a culimation of emotion and hardwork.

Dunne’s performance as Sandra is flawless. She perfectly conveys the struggle Sandra is facing and the many factors and obstacles that threaten to stop her dreams. She is exhausted but resilient and this makes for a resonating character who isn’t perfect but she is trying her best. The courtroom scene is both heartbreaking and angering as the injustice Sandra faces shouldn’t have to be argued. Gary damages the nerves in Sandra’s hand at the beginning and she turns that pain in physically building her escape from him. The whole film becomes a metaphor for Sandra bettering the situation for her girls and finding sanctuary away from Gary. Whereas Gary is able to live with his parents and await the visits from his daughters, Sandra is constantly assessed by the council, struggling to find a suitable home while facing judgement from fellow mothers and working two jobs. Despite Sandra’s many roles in society, Dunne makes sure that she gives her character a distinct personality. Faced with many hardships, Sandra is fearless and unafraid to go ahead with her plan and builds the confidence to stick up for herself. The character arc she goes through is emotional and rough contributing to an unforgettable performance.

In supporting roles, there are a couple of familiar faces and plenty of newcomers, led by the wonderful Harriet Walter who plays Peggy, the doctor Sandra cleans and cares for part time. Peggy comes across as stubborn and hard initially but as the film progresses, she begins to let her guard down and allows herself to be vulnerable as she assists Sandra in building the house. Also in support is Conleth Hill as Aido, a local construction worker who eventually agrees to help Sandra build her house. Aido doesn’t understand Sandra’s plan until she mentions Gary and he agrees to help her. Hill isn’t onscreen a lot of time but is a welcome presence whenever he is. The supporting cast is rounded out by Molly McCann and Ruby Rose O’Hara who do fantastic performances as Sandra’s daughters, Molly and Emma, respectively.

Despite its heavy themes, Herself proved to explore the injustices of domestic violence victims by showing Sandra at her highs and lows. With the film shown from Sandra’s perspective her motivations and reasonings for her actions are fully understood by the audience. Even when it becomes too much for her to handle, she still keeps fighting. With its mix between newcomers and recognisable names, Herself has established itself already as a huge highlight from this festival and I hope it carries on its success.

Herself will be released in the UK on the 16th October.

Categories
Uncategorised

The Farewell (2019)

Lulu Wang’s second feature is a brilliant insight into a millennial experience on being an immigrant in America and the struggle for identity. Following Chinese-American millennial Billi (Awkwafina), The Farewell travels from America to China as Billi’s Grandma, Nai Nai (Zhao Shu-zhen), falls ill with terminal cancer. What throws an even heavier spanner in the works is Billie’s family’s decision to not disclose the full extent of the cancer to Nai Nai leaving Billi torn between what she believes to be right and the traditions of her Chinese family. The family organises a quick wedding for one of Billi’s cousins so everyone can see Nai Nai one last time before she dies. A semi-autobiographical film based on Wang’s own experiences, it is a deeply personal film that flits flawlessly between drama and comedy in a way that feels authentic. The majority of the film is in Chinese with the American family integrating English into conversations, particularly if it involves Nai Nai. A critical and commercial success on release, it was a familiar face at awards season but controversy turned its nasty head when it was wrongly snubbed at the Oscars in all categories.

Awkwafina has slowly become one of my favourite rising stars after her great supporting turn in Ocean’s 8. Tuning into what is clearly her signature dry humour, Awkwafina’s Billi is a young woman dealing with an internal identity crisis as her American state of mind cannot comprehend the Chinese tradition of not telling a sick person about their condition. Billi’s sensitive and outspoken traits are deemed “American” and she is both mocked and chastised for it. The performance garnered Awkwafina her first Golden Globe for Best Actress in a Comedy or Musical and I am sure it won’t be her last. She was sadly omitted from the Academy Award nomination in a snub that was swirling in controversy but her time will come. It’s insane to think that this was her first leading performance in a feature film because it’s a turn that most people can only dream of achieving. Billi’s story arc is one of emotional growth. She doesn’t have all the answers but she doesn’t need to have them at the moment.

In support we have Zhao Shu-zhen turning in a fantastic performance as the resilient Nai Nai. Always putting Billi in check and making sure everyone is well fed, Nai Nai is a character of strength and Shu-zhen plays her perfectly. The dynamic Shu-zhen and Awkwafina have onscreen is brilliant and their relationship seems real to the point where it sometimes feels like you are watching a documentary. There is no reason whatsoever as to why Shu-zhen was not nominated for her Supporting role at the major award shows. Even when she is not onscreen, the audience is constantly thinking about Nai Nai and waiting for her next scene. Nai Nai has to reintroduce Billi to her Chinese heritage and does it in a way where she too becomes accustomed to Billi’s sensitivity.

There are so many scenes that can be discussed but in particular, the scene when Nai Nai is in hospital and Billi asks the doctor in English for the truth because she knows only her and her parents will understand. Not only is it a punch in the gut on the delivery of the doctor’s news but is also balanced out by Nai Nai’s attempt to set up Billi and the doctor. Despite the scene mixing Chinese and English, it never feels as though the flow and pacing is stilted. This scene is just one of many examples of Wang’s brilliant writing. In terms of her direction, the scene in which Billi runs from the wedding to collect Nai Nai’s test results from the hospital is one of huge significance. Storywise, this is the scene in which we see Billi accepting the traditions and actively following the plan to hide the condition from Nai Nai. As Billi runs a long stretch from the wedding to the hospital, the camera simply follows her in minimal takes. It is a brilliant sequence as we begin to see the desperation that Billi is feeling. These two scenes are so significant as one shows Billi’s reluctance to conform to the traditions to her embracing them and understanding.

Lulu Wang has established herself as a brilliant filmmaker with a strong vision and sharp writing. It is hard to believe that this is only her second feature film after 2014’s Posthumous. After the enormous success of Jon M. Chu’s 2018’s blockbuster Crazy Rich Asians (which also featured Awkwafina), there is clear proof that people want to see films starring and created by people of colour and minorities in an industry dominated and ran by white people. This is also what makes The Farewell so important as it is a deeply personal story but one that resonates with the audience. It would be great to see Wang collaborate with Awkwafina again as she managed to draw that dramatic side out in a way that is so rare and brilliant for comedic actresses. It’s only a matter of time before we see Wang’s name among the nominees on the major awards circuit.

What did you think of The Farewell? Let me know in the comments

Categories
Uncategorised

A Ghost Story (2017)

One of the most beautiful and somber films to come out of the 2010s is A Ghost Story written and directed by David Lowery. Premiering at Sunday’s Fil. Festival and distributed by the much-loved A24, A Ghost Story follows a young married couple C (Casey Affleck) and M (Rooney Mara) and the aftermath of the former’s untimely death at the start of the film. What makes this film such a standout is its simplicity and minimalist approach with limited locations and characters. The film is primarily filmed in their family home and showcases the figurative and literal destruction of the home as M’s life falls apart without her husband. The home is not a home. The screenplay is written by Lowery and his connection and intricacy in bringing his two protagonists to life with minimal interaction is no easy feat but he achieves this. It is a film that moved me and has provided much inspirational imagery and directorial approach that I feel sad that the film has almost been swept under the carpet.

Affleck and Mara both bring their A game to this film and give performances that are among the best in their careers. When C passes away he is reincarnated as a ghost donning a simple white sheet with holes cut out for eyes. We never see his eyes nor what is under the sheet yet Affleck’s presence and character is felt despite not speaking or providing much action. C is a musician and we hear glimpses of his song throughout bringing an unexpected electro and modern sound to the film. The music is what brings the film to its respective time period as the minimalism evokes a timeless quality. Mara is absolutely gut-wrenching in her turn as the grieving wife, M. We see a strong woman who is eventually broken down mentally and physically by the absence around her. We see a few encounters from friends and even a prospective date but the absence of C is too much for her to bear. There is only one scene when M is actually outside of the house and that is when she is identifying her husband’s body. In some respects, she is defined by her relationship to her husband but it could be argued that her struggle is actually a want and inability to move on and continue with her life. She slowly begins to recognise that C isn’t coming back no matter how much she longs for it.

It goes without saying that the highlight scene is the pie scene. This scene is infamous among film fans alike thanks to its raw one take approach to seeing a grieving wife literally eating a chocolate pie for five minutes until she makes herself sick. The scene itself is so simple yet so complex. Mara’s emotional spectrum is on display here as she eats and eats, delving into more and more despair as she longs to feel better following the funeral. The feeling of hopelessness and depression really shoot through as well as upset and loneliness. There are no words in this scene yet it says so much. It’s as if M is hoping her husband will return and stop her from eating herself to sickness but he doesn’t. In fact, no one comes and she is left alone to grieve and process what has happened. I think this scene alone warranted awards recognition but I think the rawness of the characters was probably too alien to the mainstream audience as it does make for uncomfortable and upsetting viewing.

Another scene that causes debates among its viewers is the monologue provided by a party goer, credited as the Prognosticator (Will Oldham) in the house next door. C observes as the Prognosticator talks endlessly about classical music and the Big Crunch which is a theory that claims that the universe is constantly expanding and eventually it will snap like a rubber band and collapse in on itself into a speck as if nothing existed at all. C’s frustration and anger throughout the scene causes him to make the lights flicker as he searches for meaning beyond the life he lived. The speech itself is a bit longwinded, lasting five and a half minutes. Its uneasiness and pretentious nature makes it seem longer because there is no one debating with him. It very much feels as if the Prognosticator is talking out to the audience or even the universe. It is important to note that the film has minimal dialogue so this speech is the true verbal standout the audience is provided with and I think it’s a skillful tip of the scale by Lowery who wants to create that feeling of uncertainty.

The structure of the film is unconventional following a repeat of the time that C and M lived in the house while C observes under his sheet and follows the next family to move in and the subsequent destruction of the home. It feels as though C and M’s memories together are trapped in that endless loop as the universe expands. Just as the Prognosticator claims the works of Beethoven will forever live in human memory, so will the time C and M spent in their house. When C finally reads a note M left and disappears it is sad but also brings closure to that loop and gives him a chance to leave the house just as M did before.

A Ghost Story is not your typical film exploring loss and grief but its impact and power comes from Lowery’s raw approach. Despite its seemingly effortless aesthetic, the films screenplay and character observation pushes through a complexity that transcends its simple storyline. It’s a film that will stay with you long after you watch it.

What did you think of A Ghost Story? Let me know what you think in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Marielle Heller: Film Ranking

Marielle Heller is one of the most exciting filmmakers working in the industry. Although she is not a household name in the mainstream yet, she has proven her talent and range in the three feature films she has directed so far. All three are adaptations of different mediums which also shows Heller’s skill as a writer. Starting with The Diary of a Teenage Girl in 2015 thrust Heller as an emerging writer/director thanks to its controversial and unflinching portrayal of its subject matter of underage sex. Following this, Heller made a dramatic star out of comedienne Melissa McCarthy in biopic Can You Ever Forgive Me? in 2018 followed by 2019’s A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood which follows a journalist writing a piece on American icon, Mister Rogers. Her absence from major award nominations has been subject to controversy with stars such as fellow director Greta Gerwig and Natalie Portman using their platform to promote her work.

Here are my mini reviews and rankings for the films by Marielle Heller:

The Diary of a Teenage Girl (2015)

Heller’s debut is the perfect scene stealer opening up with 15 year old Minnie (Bel Powley) walking in the park with her confident voice over stating “I had sex today. Holy shit!” Heller’s script and direction follows Minnie from a distance allowing her life to play out with the complicated relationships she has with her mum, Charlotte (Kristen Wiig) and Charlotte’s boyfriend, Monroe (Alexander Skarsgård). Powley’s breakout performance is nothing short of perfection. She comes across as confident and all-knowing, even recording audio diaries. Based on a hybrid novel combining novel and graphic novel by Phoebe Gloeckner. Minnie winds up in a sexual relationship with Monroe and believes she is in love blind to the realities of the situation. As the affair goes on, Monroe is dismissive of Minnie’s satisfaction and is aware what he is doing is wrong. The film is a unique look into the sexual mistreatment of women and girls and how society expects them to act in order to satisfy the patriarchy. It is a film about personal and emotional growth with Minnie eventually learning to become independent and satisfied in herself and her talents as an artist. Despite her flaws and mistakes, she thrives above what society thinks of her and does what makes her happy.

Can You Ever Forgive Me? (2018)

Heller’s follow-up Can You Ever Forgive Me? is based on the 2008 memoir of the same name by writer Lee Israel. Following Israel (Melissa McCarthy) as she forges letters written by famous writers and sells them off to earn extra money, Can You Ever Forgive Me? is a film about the writer and artist desperation. At the beginning of the film, Israel is experiencing a career slump, unable to secure an advance for her book and is forced to sell her possessions to pay her bills. What starts from selling a personal letter from Katharine Hepburn spirals into forging letters from celebrities with scandalous details. Enlisting the help of her friend, Jack (Richard E. Grant), the two begin stealing letters from libraries and archives as well as forging other letters. McCarthy and Grant bring career best performances and earned them Oscar nominations for Best Actress in a Leading Role and Best Actor in a Supporting Role (Grant’s first and, to date, only Oscar nomination!).

A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood (2019)

One of my favourite films from last year, this underrated gem stars Tom Hanks as American treasure, Mister Rogers and features Matthew Rhys as a skeptical reporter who is asigned to write on Rogers. I have written a longer review for A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood here which you can read. Bringing Tom Hanks his first Oscar nomination in years, A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood utilises wonderful puppetry in a film that is heartwarming with a deep message. Among a film landscape that is full of fear and dread, it’s nice to see a film about kindness and love being made.

Each film has its strengths and they are all so different which makes it difficult to rank them even though there are only three. Here is my ranking for Heller’s films:

1) The Diary of a Teenage Girl

2) A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood

3) Can You Ever Forgive Me?

I really recommend giving each of these films a viewing at least once. Heller has a knack for drawing out brilliant and unexpected performances in films thay serve as flawless examinations of its characters.

Have you seen any Marielle Heller films? Which ones are your favourites? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Uncut Gems (2019)

I have said this once and I will say it again. When Adam Sandler puts his mind to it, he can turn out a star-studded performance that most dramatic actors can only dream of. He did it in Paul Thomas Anderson’s 2003 Punch-Drunk Love and he’s done it again in the mind-warping Uncut Gems, directed by Josh and Benny Safdie (commonly referred to as the Safdie Brothers). Following Howard Ratner (Sandler), the owner of a luxurious jewellers in the Diamond District in New York and his inability to function as a normal human would. Crippled simultaneously by debt and a gambling addiction to boot, Howard is an awful human being and the Safdies make this no secret. The audience isn’t supposed to like him and yet we do because he is charismatic and pathetic at the same time. When a priceless gem is delivered to him and loaned to basketball star Kevin Garnett, Howard finds himself on the brink of self-destruction as he struggles to get the stone back and at the auction house where he expects to earn millions. Produced by powerhouse studio A24 and distributed on Netflix, Uncut Gems is the film equivalent of an anxiety attack thanks to the unrelenting actions of its protagonist who doesn’t know how to relax. Featuring a variety of celebrity cameos including The Week’nd, Tilda Swinton and Natasha Lyonne, there is also a strong supporting cast led by Lakeith Stanfield as Howard’s assistant, Demany and Julia Fox as Howard’s girlfriend, Julia.

The Safdie Brothers’ vision comes across brilliantly on the technical side. Known for their collaborations with Ronald Bronstein who cowrote the script with both Safdies and also co-edited the film with Benny Safdie. This is a film that needed more than one mind behind the vision and the result is crisp and sleek. The writing is sharp and to the point which is crucial as there are many characters and plenty of scenes in which lots of characters populate the screen. It’s a film that benefits from its direct nature meaning that there are few speeches and little emotion. When the film does delve deep into serious emotion, it feels almost disingenuous because the characters are so self-absorbed. It is the deeply flawed characters that gives the film its grit. What I love most about this film is how fantastical it feels in terms of the tone as Howard lives a luxurious life and yet the violence he is exposed to grounds the film. There is a disconnect between the life Howie should have and the life that he does have. Despite his wealth, he is constantly viewed as an outsider for a multitude of reasons. One such reason is his Jewish faith which is constantly remarked on by his clientele, friends and those he deals with when betting. Another such reason is his inability to maintain sustainable relationships. His paranoia overtakes his love for Julia because he cannot truly fathom that a woman like her could truly love a man like him. His insecurity is a constant throughout the film and is the main reason for his instability.

uncut-garnett-sandler-1576518581

Adam Sandler is nothing short of brilliant in this film and should have been nominated for all of the awards including the Oscar. His performance is manic and seems lucid but the amount of work Sandler put into this character is clear. Howard is deeply complex. He is fully aware of his issues and yet doesn’t do anything about them. The film is constantly moving up and down as Howard’s rollercoaster way of living reflects the wins and losses he experiences in gambling. This film has become instantly quotable with gifs and memes flooding the internet. Howard’s sleaziness only adds to his dark humour and helplessness. The film is from Howard’s perspective meaning Sandler is onscreen for the vast majority of the film’s 135 minute running time. What makes the character of Howard so hypnotic and engaging to watch is that he acts like an unreliable narrator at times. We hope he pulls through but at the same time his flaws often outweigh his strengths. The climactic scene in which Howard is watching the final basketball game that he has bet all of his earnings on is deeply intense and yet he seems relatively calm. His certainty that he will win when his first bet was reliant on a coin toss is unbelievable. If there was an award for the most frustrating character in film history, Howard would definitely be up there but that is exactly how he is meant to be. He is one of the most unlikeable likeable characters I have ever come across and I think it’s credit to Sandler’s skill that he manages to pull that off.

The score provided by Oneohtrix Point Never is a showstopper. The tone that the score gives is in a similar vein to Jóhann Jóhannsson’s brilliant score for the 2018 film, Mandy. Much like Jóhannsson’s score, Oneohtrix Point Never’s score has also proven divisive but I think that Uncut Gems is a film that doesn’t hold back in its performance, script and subject matter. The music is futuristically nostalgic, merging various genres and sounds to create a soundtrack that is unique. Much like the protagonist, the score doesn’t seem to settle and keeps crashing through, heightening the tension and making for an anxiety-ridden audience experience. The score category in awards season was very strong this year but I still think it was a shame that the Uncut Gems soundtrack wasn’t at least recognised. The fact that it clashes with what you see on the screen adds to the jarring effect that the film brought.

uncutgems

Uncut Gems lives up to the hype and delivers brilliance in spades. It’s a shame that it wasn’t recognised this awards season but I believe that Sandler’s performance specifically will not go unnoticed. If anything, Uncut Gems has opened the door for Sandler to continue tackling challenging roles and it makes me excited to see what the Safdie Brothers have planned next. It’s a film that isn’t afraid to make light of the dark topics it explores such as addiction and violence. It’s reluctance to fit into a specific box of film makes it a stand out in the same way that Parasite is and I think it was stronger than a lot of contenders this awards season.

What did you think of Uncut Gems? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Yentl (1983)

Barbra Streisand’s directorial debut follows the titular character (Streisand), a young woman living in an Ashkenazi Jewish community in the early 20th century who disguises as a man to study in a Yeshiva after her father passes away. Based on the short story by Isaac Bashevis Singer and cowritten by Streisand and Jack Rosenthal, Yentl is a film about subverting the cultural and societal norm as well as conflicts between religion and morality. Yentl Mendel is constantly questioning the way of life in her village and is looked down upon by the townspeople for being unmarried with no prospect of settling down. It is only when she disguises as a man called Anshel that she finds a place of belonging and her views are accepted and even celebrated. Problems occur when Yentl begins to fall in love with her mentor, Avigdor (Mandy Patinkin) who is in love with his ex-fiancée Hadass (Amy Irving) who then in turn falls in love with Anshel. It is the very definition of a love triangle and allows the film to have some lighter moments such as Anshel and Hadass’ wedding night. Winning Streisand a Best Director award at the Golden Globes making her the first and to date only woman to win the accolade, Yentl marks a huge step for female filmmakers in the mainstream thanks to its star appeal and critical and commercial success.

Streisand as director is really remarkable. You can sense the passion that she has for this film. Although there are trademark comedic moments and musical numbers that are identifiable with a Streisand picture, there is no doubt that the dramatic elements and aesthetic allow Streisand to explore a darker approach that we hadn’t really seen from her on film previously. Streisand’s female gaze gives this film a new perspective that we haven’t seen before in film. Instead of condemning Yentl’s choices, we view Anshel as a sensitive man who isn’t afraid of his vulnerability despite living in a male dominated environment. Where it not for Streisand’s feminine interpretation, the performance of Anshel could have slipped into caricature and taken away from the mature themes that the film discusses. Streisand lends a heavy feminist focus as she disputes why a woman cannot have the same outlook and expectation of a man while still appreciating the jobs that the women do. Yentl can be viewed as a crossover between genders and she doesn’t really fit in and altering her gender isn’t an issue. The pursuit of knowledge and equality overtakes the ideals expected of her. There are so many different readings that could be made when watching this film. It has been argued that Yentl could be considered as a queer film thanks to its discussions on gender and sexuality which adds a more progressive meaning to the story.

yentl.jpg

In terms of her performance, it’s best to view Streisand as playing two roles rather than one such is her success in distinctly differentiating the two. Her Yentl is typical Streisand: sassy, witty and strong with an ambition to subvert the norm. This is the Streisand that we have grown to love in her previous cinematic outings. What is different about Yentl is that she is aware that she is trapped within her local community. When reciting the Talmud at her father’s funeral, it becomes such a scandal and causes widespread gossip. The transition period between Yentl and Anshel comes from her journey to the Yeshiva which includes her heartbreaking rendition of “Papa, Can You Hear Me?” where Yentl begs her father for forgiveness for her decision to disguise as a man in pursuit of an education. She sits alone in the forest at nighttime with nothing but a candle for light and it is then when the realisation of what she has done comes to fruition. It is also the point where she knows that there is no turning back and thus has to embody the identity of Anshel. Streisand’s Anshel takes a bit of getting used to in the same way as Yentl getting used to her new identity. We witness Anshel practicing his tone of voice and mannerisms, making sure not to appear too feminine without risking his integrity.

Mandy Patinkin does a wonderful job as Avigdor, Anshel’s friend and mentor at the Yeshiva who is initially engaged to Hadass. Avigdor isn’t afraid to be vulnerable to Anshel and his other male friends but the idea of being vulnerable to Hadass or her mother disgusts him. He doesn’t allow himself to get involved in any confrontation and is always calm when in her company. Avigdor seems so progressive when we are first introduced because he is so accepting of Anshel but it is easy to forget that Anshel is Yentl and he has no idea. When he spouts ideas about a woman’s true place in the home and that Hadass cannot think for herself, it comes across as a shock and ignorant but despite his intelligence, Avigdor is still a product of an environment that looks down on women. In another brilliant supporting turn, Amy Irving was deservedly nominated for an Oscar for Best Supporting Actress in her role as Hadass. When we first meet Hadass, she appears to fulfill all the criteria of the perfect woman and seems to do everything at the men’s commands. What we don’t realise is that she has successfully supressed any feeling of rebellion and it is when she is married to Anshel that she shares her aspirations to learn more. Yentl is in the middle of these two characters and yet it is because of Yentl that they are drawn closer together and allow themselves a more progressive and happier life.

yentl2.png

The amazing music is composed by Michel Legrand, one of the best composers that the film industry had to offer. From his imagination we were given the incredible song “Papa, Can You Hear Me?” composed by Legrand with lyrics written by Alan and Marilyn Bergman. The trio won an Oscar for Best Original Song Score and Its Adaptation or Adaptation Score. In true Legrand fashion, the music is whimsical and brings an essence of fairytale to the story. The musical numbers are far and few between but the score itself is wonderfully subtle when you compare to Legrand’s catalogue such as the music for Les Parapluies De Cherbourg (The Umbrellas of Cherbourg). The songs are suited to Streisand’s amazing vocal range, especially the aforementioned song but rather than being full of show-stopping numbers like the ones in Funny Girl, Legrand makes use of Yentl’s male identity and gives the songs a lower key register so Yentl is singing as if she were a man herself.

Overall, Yentl is a film that has helped pave the way for female filmmakers in mainstream cinema. It is a film not without flaws but it has beauty in its ability to discuss ideas that are considered taboo. Even within the Orthodox setting in the early 20th century, there are still similarities that Streisand is able to get across to link with the modern day. Yentl is not a film that Streisand wishes to make all about herself despite directing and starring in it but the story of how women are often subjected to misogyny and not afforded the chances of their male counterparts. It is equal parts drama and musical and a smaller part comedy which encapsulates Yentl’s character.

What did you think of Yentl? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Bombshell (2019)

One film that has brought much buzz among the acting categories is the Fox News centred biopic Bombshell. Following numerous women working at Fox and their experiences of sexual harassment at the hands of their boss, Roger Ailes, the audience follow the lives of three women at different levels of their careers are observed. At the top of the game there is Megyn Kelly (Charlize Theron), then there is recently fired anchor, Gretchen Carlson (Nicole Kidman) and at the bottom of the tier is newcomer Kayla Pospisil (Margot Robbie) who is based on a culmination of women who worked at Fox. This was not a film I thought would be as gripping or exploitive as it was but this film contains some very upsetting material that shows the trauma that women are forced to endure in order to be successful. The event that acts as a catalyst is Kelly’s encounter with Presidential candidate Donald Trump who tweets various misogynist insults her way after a challenging exchange during the Presidential debate. We see Kelly’s world turned upside down as her and her family’s livelihood is at stake at the hands of a ruthless paparazzi and a passionately threatening audience. Simultaneously, Carlson is fired from her position and seeks to sue Ailes for sexual harassment which is described as a money grab from those at Fox. Overall, it is a film that shows the hardship of women and how dangers in the workplace seep into their personal lives. Directed by Jay Roach and written by Charles Randolph, Bombshell allows its female protagonists to develop and grow while showing their vulnerability and resilience in their quest to end the patriarchal harassment that has humiliated women at Fox over the years.

Charlize Theron is so brilliant as Kelly. In the same vein as Monster, Theron transforms into her subject and manages to perfect every detail about them. Completely deserving of the nominations that she has received, Theron’s Kelly is poised, collected and observant. She is a woman who will not be messed around. This makes the scene in which she opens up about her experience with Ailes shocking considering her strength and influence in the workplace. During the conflict with Trump, Kelly doesn’t make any vengeful comments back and instead is aware that Fox’s access to Trump during the Presidential campaign is crucial. She is able to put her own motivations to the side. It is when she puts herself first that a wave of women from Fox come out and discuss their experience. It’s no surprise that Theron has garnered her third Oscar nomination for her portrayal as this controversial figure. She has this command when she is on the screen and a strength that makes it even more shocking when comments about her menstruating are used as an excuse for her challenging nature. She is constantly given a harder time because she is a woman and not taken as seriously as her male counterparts. Equally, Kelly has respect for Ailes and when the accusations come to light, she faces a struggle between her genuine loyalty to him and the truth. In the end, she realises that she must go with the latter but this isn’t a decision that comes easy or without consequence.

In terms of our supporting protagonists, we are given Margot Robbie and Nicole Kidman as newcomer Kayla Pospisil and fired anchor Gretchen Carlson, respectively. Robbie is beyond outstanding in support and continues a stellar year. The scene in which her character is harassed and forced to show her crotch to Ailes is extremely upsetting and difficult to watch. We see Robbie’s brilliantly layered expression as she is clearly distraught and uncomfortable herself at having to do this but she knows she must grin and bear it for risk of being fired. Kayla is a fictional character but the development of her character and the depth that she is portrayed with feels very real. The idea to accumulate multiple women into one has served Randolph’s script well as it allows various perspectives to be shown without confusing or overloading the audience with too many characters. Robbie gained an Oscar nomination for her portrayal and it is so deserved. Time and time again, Robbie is showing us her range and has managed to compile a really impressive filmography following her departure from Australian soap opera Neighbours. Kayla is a character who shows a side of Robbie that we haven’t been able to see before and makes it all the more exciting to see what roles she will take on in the future.

On the other hand, Kidman is definitely underused but packs a punch when she is onscreen. I understand that with three prominent protagonists, it can be tricky to prioritise whose story to go more in depth on but it would be wrong to underestimate Gretchen’s important in this narrative. She is the initial driving force and brings this story out to public knowledge. The opening scene shows other female anchors following the rules followed by a collection of clips of Gretchen being told that her outfits are lovely as well as comments on her body with Gretchen looking uncomfortable but laughing it off. She is immediately presented as an outsider from the get go. When confronted by a woman in the supermarket who tells her that her show and Fox News are a disgrace, Gretchen doesn’t understand and twists it back on the woman. The performance doesn’t require the same level of depth and development that Theron and Robbie have to bring because Gretchen is already at the stage of rebellion but Kidman loses herself in the role. We don’t see Kidman, we see Gretchen. It would also be wrong not to mention the eerie performance from John Lithgow as Ailes. It isn’t easy to play a role like Ailes as someone who seems kind and respected but so manipulative and abusive beneath the surface. Despite having limited screen time, Ailes has a horrifying and lingering presence over the whole film and that is thanks to Lithgow’s intimidating command that he has when he is onscreen. He is very much a puppet master.

Bombshell was a surprisingly intense and thrilling film to watch. The limited use of location, primarily the Fox studios makes for a claustrophobic experience that reflects the entrapped environment that the woman work in. The intriguing part about it is how the women start speaking out without really talking to one another for fear of being outed as a traitor. Thanks to its controversial subject matter and triple female protagonist set-up, it probably will have limited success at awards season but the fact that it has received nominations is a great achievement. Theron, in particular, really brings her A game and delivers her best performance in years.

What did you think of Bombshell? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

The Two Popes (2019)

The first film I watched this decade is a surprising choice in the form of biopic The Two Popes following the conservative Cardinal Ratzinger (Anthony Hopkins) who becomes Pope Benedict XVI and his eventual friendship with the more liberal Cardinal Bergoglio (Jonathan Pryce), who later becomes Pope Francis. Directed by Brazilian director Fernando Meirelles with a script written by Anthony McCarten based on the latter’s novel The Pope, The Two Popes manages to successfully avoid falling into the trap of becoming another studio churned out biopic. There is no doubt that the two leads are the stars of the show and contribute a lot to the film’s overall acclaim but Meirelles control on the tone of the film and McCarten’s deeply intense script make The Two Popes a thrilling watch, particularly scenes when it is the two gentleman by themselves. The film’s strength comes in its constant shift in dynamic. The opening scenes follow the death of Pope John Paul II and the deciding vote on who will be his successor and the differences between the two eventual popes are crystal clear. Cardinal Ratzinger does everything in his power to become Pope and succeeds by persuading his fellow Cardinals during breaks from voting whereas Bergoglio is discomforted by the prospect of becoming pontiff. There seems to be a projected rivalry on the two men which Ratzinger seems to act on but Bergoglio is perplexed by this narrative.

The power from this film comes from the brilliant screenplay by McCarten. His script reads like a power struggle at times as the dynamic shifts between the two popes’ favour throughout. The inclusion of flashbacks and context into their histories also helps the film to avoid being just a simple story of one Pope’s decline and another’s ascension. There is no bias for either one as we are just presented with facts such as Ratzinger’s admission that he knew about the molestation within the Church before the scandal came to light. Despite the two men being a part of the same religion, they have completely different viewpoints. Ratzinger feels that resigning is the only way to seek absolution whereas Bergoglio thinks that he should remain Pope and see the scandal through to the end. Bergoglio’s upbringing and story is filled with a lot more turmoil than Ratzinger who seems to have had a more privileged upbringing. Their conflicting interests and differing politics result in Bergoglio coming across as more compassionate than Ratzinger because he is more accepting and open to change. The ending scene with the two men watching the football is funny to watch and makes for a light tone to suggest that their friendship is on good terms.

The two leads excel in their roles as expected. Jonathan Pryce is absolutely brilliant in the leading role as Bergoglio who is the quietly outspoken of the two. Constantly having to justify his stance on controversial topics that differ from the conservative Church teachings, Bergoglio is seen equally as a disgrace and a revolutionary within the Church. It comes to light that this has been the case all his life with his complicated background during the Argentinian militaria regime. Whereas Ratzinger revels in the tradition and opulence of the Catholic Church, Bergoglio is happy with what he has. He doesn’t understand why those high up in the Church live in such luxury. Pryce is perfect casting in both his appearance and his characterisation, truly becoming the future pope. You never know what he is going to do or say next because he is unpredictable. One minute he will be conversing in Latin with Ratzinger and the next he will be teaching him how to tango.

Anthony Hopkins’ performance is his best in film for years. Bringing out mannerisms subtly with an understated accent and acting that seems effortless but is really meticulous, Hopkins is fantastic as the newly elected Pope. Ratzinger is not necessarily a likeable character because he is so set in his ways and has many dated opinions that don’t fit in with the times. He is clearly a highly intelligent man and extremely well-read but also detached from modern society. In some ways Bergoglio tests him to embrace the present world more and try to adapt. We don’t see as much of Ratzinger’s background as Bergoglio’s but Hopkins gives us enough to know that he has always been a lonely figure. The scene in which Ratzinger gives Bergoglio his confession is fantastic. The audience lingers on Hopkins’ words as he reveals his difficult time growing up and being saved by God.

In terms of awards buzz, The Two Popes has garnered attention for Pryce and Hopkins’ performances. I don’t think either will win due to strong competition in both categories but they are deserved nominations. I didn’t think I would find this film particularly enjoyable but I was pleasantly surprised. The performances alone are enough to the grip the viewer but it proved to be even more. It’s not a film about religion but more of a character study about two very men who are connected because of that religion. There were many gripping scenes filled with tension as the two popes debate about various aspects of the church. I also wasn’t expecting the film to have so many funny moments as well and it doesn’t feel too heavy in subject matter. I think following it primarily from the point of view of Bergoglio was a smart choice as we see the events from both the inside and the outside depending on what is happening.

What did you think of The Two Popes? Let me know in the comments below!