Categories
Uncategorised

Why Parasite’s win is important

Going into the 92nd Academy Awards, it seemed that pretty much every category was a lock. Joaquin Phoenix was favoured to take home the Best Actor gong for Joker, Renee Zellweger winning Best Actress for Judy and Sam Mendes was the strong favourite to win Best Director for 1917 with the latter ultimately winning Best Picture. How much the Academy surprised us then when the Best Director trophy was awarded to Bong Joon-ho for Parasite and then his film won the Best Picture award, beating the odds. Personally I was very happy as I had placed a bet on Parasite to win so there was a monetary reward for myself but the happiness goes to another more serious level. 1917 is a prime example of a quintessential award film. Don’t get me wrong, 1917 is a brilliant film that is full of revolutionary technical achievement, particularly Roger Deakins’ cinematography but it is no secret that the Academy and other Western award bodies have a love affair with war films. So much so that it has become a running joke in the film industry that to win awards, you have to make or star in a war film.

For those who are not in the know, Parasite is a Korean film exploring classism and inequality in a society that only benefits the rich and leaves those poorer to live in the gutter (quite literally). It has been the source of much hype since its premiere at last year’s Cannes Film Festival where it won the top prize, the Palme d’Or, in a rare unanimous vote, marking the first Korean film to win the prestigious award. Korean cinema is among the best in the world and has been a leading institution for years for filmmakers and film lovers and it felt like it was finally getting its due in the mainstream. Bong Joon-ho has previously delved into English-language with Snowpiercer (2013) and Okja (2017) which have become much-loved modern classics and released to acclaim; however, I think it’s poignant that Bong’s ascendance to the global audience has come from a Korean-language film that explores Korean society. It is very much detached from Western society in both its subject matter and filmmaking technique, allowing Bong to direct without the restrictions that Western studios demand. The fact that a film like Parasite, a film that is inherently unique in its style and content can beat a film like 1917 shows that there is an appetite for a different kind of film experience. It also shows a promising step forward in what audiences now expect. Naturally, franchises such as the Marvel and DC films still top the box office but Parasite concrete proof that people want more variety in the cinemas as well. Parasite’s subsequent box office success after its award wins confirms this. Now that it’s been given the chance to screen in more cinemas, it’s been able to demonstrate that there is an audience who want to watch foreign-language films, snubbing the assumption that Western audiences don’t want to watch films with subtitles.

There are many people who dismiss award season as pointless and dim, viewing it as celebrities patting themselves on the back. I don’t think it is as simple as that though. The truth is people do pay attention to awards season and follow the films that are successful. Of course, a lot of time there are the usual suspects who are nominated time and time again, sometimes undeservedly but when you have a film like Parasite that isn’t given the same chance as a mediocre English-language film then the exposure that award season brings is crucial for the film’s box office success.

Overall, there were some brilliant films this award season but Parasite was the clear standout. The fact that it won the major awards is a sign that the Academy is looking at artistic merit and not just succumbing to making it a popularity contest. Parasite’s win may not seem significant but the importance cannot be understated. Hopefully this will spark the beginning of an awards body that seeks to be more inclusive and diverse, giving all films an equal chance.

Here are my reviews for some of the films of the 92nd Academy Awards:

Winners: 1917, Joker, Jojo Rabbit, Judy, Marriage Story, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, Parasite, Toy Story 4

Nominees: A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood, Bombshell, The Irishman, The Lighthouse, The Two Popes

Snubs: Dolemite Is My Name, Hustlers, Midsommar, Uncut Gems

What did you think of Parasite’s winning streak at the Oscars? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Hustlers (2019)

One of the most hyped films of the year comes in the form of Lorene Scafaria’s crime drama, Hustlers. Based on the New York Magazine article that follows a group of strippers who drug and con Wall Street men off their money during the 2008 recession. The film stars Constance Wu as Destiny, a former stripper who is interviewed by Elizabeth (Julia Stiles) who is conducting research for her article. Destiny reflects on her rise to the top with the help of veteran stripper, Ramona (Jennifer Lopez) and together they concoct a plan that sees them milking the Wall Street types for all they’re worth. This film could have easily slipped into a male gaze fantasy that sexualises the women and focuses on their bodies rather than their minds and motivations but luckily, with a female director and female majority clue, this film becomes a poignant reflection on the treatment of women and the recklessness of the rich who exploit the poor.

Lorene Scafaria’s direction and script is brilliant with multiple characters receiving plenty of depth and screen time all while keeping it boxed in within the interview narrative. It’s a simple technique to use to detach the audience from the dramatic events in the film. Aside from these glimpses into the future interview, the flashback follows a linear structure and shows the budding relationship between Destiny and Ramona as well as their falling out. The genius of Scafaria’s direction comes in focusing on the faces of the characters rather than their bodies. As Ramona does her opening dance, the screen flits to Destiny who looks on in awe as well as Ramona herself who clearly knows exactly what she’s doing as she writhes in a pile of money. Another brilliant scene is when Destiny grows tired of being interviewed by Elizabeth and switches off her recorder. What follows is a scene of silence to reflect that Destiny is now protected from this woman who has lived such a different life from her. Constance Wu was the perfect choice for Destiny. The difference between her as an aspiring stripper and the uncomfortable woman who has lived through the experiences at the interview is like viewing two different people. Wu doesn’t hold back in her vulnerability. Destiny is clearly a rookie at her job and to see Ramona take her under her wing rather than set her up for failure is something that a film created for the male gaze would not do. This is an authentic view of womanhood and it’s made all the more empowering knowing that it was made by a woman and features a collection of strong female characters.

hustlers1

I think it’s only right to give Jennifer Lopez her own section. The triple threat truly comes into her own as Destiny’s mentor, Ramona and has subsequently earned multiple major award nominations so far including Golden Globe and SAG nominations for Best Supporting Actress. It’s pretty inevitable that she will receive an Academy Award nomination at this point also and deservedly so. Ramona is presented as ruthless but caring, mentor and mother. She sees herself in Destiny and only wants to give her the best life that she never had. Despite her many flaws, we are drawn to Ramona and we understand why she thinks the way she does despite the danger in her plans. Her experience as a woman of colour who’s livelihood is dependant on the rich white men of Wall Street is shattered as she decides to take these matters into her own hands. Ramona understands that the only way to achieve the American Dream is to rely on oneself rather than lean on an unreliable patriarchy that is all to happy to kick those less fortunate to the curb. The audience doesn’t see Jennifer Lopez. From the first moment she appears on the screen, she is Ramona.

In terms of the supporting cast, we see Keke Palmer, Lili Reinhart, Cardi B and Lizzo popping up on the screen as fellow strippers. It’s great to see a majority collection of strong women of colour in a film that builds them up rather than knocking them down. Their lifestyle isn’t glorified but it isn’t judged either. It simply is. Cardi B was cast due to her past experience as a stripper before hitting the bigtime and Lizzo is cast due to her positive body message that she likes to convey in her music. This proves how important it was to Scafaria that the female cast have confidence and aren’t ashamed of their characters. Hustlers is a brilliant example of a film by women for women. I look forward to seeing what else Scafaria has up her sleeve as well as Lopez’s next acting ventures. It’s a film that brings a spectrum of emotions while remaining true to its message and true to the characters. Hustlers presents us with the argument that not everything is black and white and although openly flawed, the motivations are not to be glorified or judged. These are events that simply happened as a consequence of context.

cardib

The soundtrack is packed with nostalgia as we are truly thrown back to old school hits that range from Janet Jackson to Britney Spears. There’s even a cameo from Usher as the singer was reported to have visited the club. The film becomes elevated by its music. After all, it provides the literal backtrack to the women’s dance so picking the right songs is key. It is cleverly mixed with classical pieces that help to detach those scenes of adrenaline with the more hard-hitting drama. One aspect of the soundtrack that I thought was genius was not including songs by Jennifer Lopez, Cardi B or Lizzo. Despite the idea of an original collab being incredible and Oscar fodder that everyone would eat up, omitting their musical achievements outside of the film allows them to embrace the characters they are and brings the audience to a higher level of relatability and believability.

In a year that has seen many brilliant films written and directed by women, Hustlers is a great insight into the future of female cinema. If you haven’t seen this yet, I highly recommend that you do. As always, let me know what you think of Hustlers in the comments below!