Categories
Review

Elvis (2022)

Elvis is one of the big films to be released this year as it sees Australian filmmaker Baz Luhrmann make a return to the big screen since his 2013 adaptation of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby. Starring Austin Butler as the titular musician, Elvis Presley, the film chronicles his turbulent relationship with his manager, Colonel Tom Parker (Tom Hanks) and his attempts to balance an incredibly successful singing career and a family life with wife, Priscilla (Olivia DeJonge) and daughter, Lisa-Marie. It’s a dazzling film that is relentless in storytelling yet simultaneously tells a tragic story about a talented individual who is consistently taken advantage of, culminating in a sad end that sees him addicted to drugs and unable to break free from his manager’s clutches.

The film is directed by Baz Luhrmann who cowrote the script with Sam Bromell, Craig Pearce and Jeremy Doner. As expected from a Luhrmann film, Elvis is a striking film that believes in a “more is more” philosophy, cramming in plenty of visual symbolism and cultural references to emphasise the setting of the film. Luhrmann knows how to craft a film that coincides with music and while the script may be hefty coming in at 160 minutes with odd pacing at time, it allows us to see a side to Elvis that the audience never got to see. There are certain elements that are looked over as it’s clear that Luhrmann wants to ensure that Elvis is portrayed in as positive a light as possible, while also ensuring that Parker is the clear villain of the film which is does.

Austin Butler beat out a ton of big names to portray the musician. His Elvis doesn’t feel like a cheap imitation in the way that many musician biopics do. Butler’s performance feels thoroughly researched and dedicated as there is a longing that Elvis has to better his career and a frustration as his attempts to try new things are stopped by Parker. The scenes in which Elvis confronts Parker about the latter’s behaviour is truly terrifying as all the tension and anger had bubbled to the surface. His singing performance is also excellent as it doesn’t feel as though he is trying to do a perfect match, but he does sound a lot like Elvis, making it difficult to separate which sounds and images are Butler and which are Elvis throughout.

Tom Hanks portrays Colonel Tom Parker in a role that sees him play against type. Hanks has been open in the past about not playing a villain, but it all changes when portraying Parker. An intriguing decision Luhrmann made was to shoot the film from Parker’s perspective, ultimately making him no different to an unreliable narrator. Parker is surprised by the accusations that have been thrown his way through the years and denies that he treated Elvis badly. Hanks’ performance is filled with deceit and deception as he manipulates Elvis into doing his business. While it may not seem obvious at first, his manipulation becomes more obvious and desperate as the film goes on. It will be surprising if Hanks is not brought into the Best Supporting Actor conversation come award season as it shows him tackling new range.

As with any Baz Luhrmann film, the cinemtography is a sight to behold. Collaborating with Luhrmann for a second time is Mandy Walker, who worked on his 2008 film, Australia. Walker conveys the delusion of show business and its ruthless nature. One moment we are at Elvis’ youth which is simplistic and more traditional in its style before diving into the bright, dizzying lights of Vegas and the swirling roulette tables that are always spinning as we see Elvis worked to the bone at the hands of his greedy manager.

One element that contributes to the striking aesthetic is the costume design by Catherine Martin. This is a film where the costumes become a character themselves as Elvis dons almost one hundred different costumes throughout the movie. What is impressive about Martin’s dedication to her craft is that she commissioned costumes that were made in exactly the same way that Elvis’ jumpsuits were made for the stage. This gives the costumes that authentic feeling without feeling silly or like a caricature. Even the elaborate stage costumes have a natural appearance about them as we have seen Elvis’ personal style develop over the course of the film’s 160 minute run.

The film is filled to the brim with Elvis classics, but what Luhrmann does that is always brilliant to see is tweak the music and incorporate a more modern film. In the same vein as Mounlin Rouge!, the soundtrack is filled with covers from current artists, showcasing the timelessness of Elvis’ music. What the sound department do brilliantly is combine the original Elvis vocals with the covers so it becomes one song, while the score and sound mixing is done brilliantly throughout the film so the audience are truly immersed in music, as though we were in Elvis’ mind.

Overall, Elvis may contain all the trademarks associated with Luhrmann’s filmography and it works beautifully with the film’s subject by showcasing the glitz and glamour of show business. With excellent leading performances from Butler and Hanks, it’s easy to imagine this film up for some nominations come awards season, even if there is a while to go.

What did you think of Elvis? Let me know in the comments below!

Elvis is available to view in cinemas now!

Categories
Uncategorised

House of Gucci (2021)

Awards season sees the release of star-studded films and there are few films released this year that have an Oscar count as high as Ridley Scott’s House of Gucci. Following the true story of the assassination of Gucci heir, Maurizio Gucci (Adam Driver) at the hands of his estranged wife, Patrizia (Lady Gaga), House of Gucci is a two and a half-hour look into the public and private familial struggles of one of the most well-known brands in the world and the scandal that surrounds them. The film has garnered much discussion due to its American casting as opposed to an Italian cast as well as the tone of the writing which injects a lot of humour into a film that is based on a tragic true story. Boasting a cast that is led by Lady Gaga, Adam Driver, Jared Leto, Jeremy Irons, and Al Pacino, House of Gucci may not be perfect but it is a highly entertaining watch that keeps you gripped from beginning to end.

The film is Ridley Scott’s second feature to be released this year following The Last Duel which also starred Adam Driver. Scott’s directions feed into the melodramatic qualities of the story and the result is a film that is extremely camp, gripping, and filled to the brim with twists and turns as each member of the Gucci family has their own roles and motives. The screenplay was written by Becky Johnston and Roberto Bentivegna and was adapted from the novel The House of Gucci: A Sensational Story of Murder, Madness, Glamour, and Greed by Sara Gay Forden. The two and a half hour running time is a bit excessive as there are scenes that could have been edited or cut out without compromising the story but what this screenplay does well is show how Patrizia was more than just Maurizio’s wife and delving into her character so we see her side of the story. It is clear that this story has so many moving parts and different elements that bringing every detail in a feature-length film would be impossible but we are treated to a film that has a distinct tonal shift as the comedy-led first act soon takes a downwards spiral into the darker themes as Patrizia and Maurizio’s marriage begins to crack and fall apart.

Leading the incredible ensemble is Lady Gaga in her follow-up to her turn in A Star is Born which saw her nominated for an Academy Award for her performance and winning one for co-writing the song “Shallow” which became a huge hit. There has been a lot of discussion regarding Gaga’s accent in the trailer for House of Gucci with some people commenting that it sounded Russian rather than Italian; however, her accent throughout the film sounds more Italian. What is more important than the accent is the actual performance itself and there is no doubt that Gaga has done extensive research and provided a lot of dedication to become Patrizia. Where it was more difficult to differentiate Gaga from her character, Ally, in A Star is Born, there are points in House of Gucci where you forget that you are watching Gaga as she fully becomes Patrizia. Not only does this show Gaga’s ability to act against type but it shows that she is worthy of garnering the leading lady status that she has and proves her talent as an actress. Her ability to showcase the many sides of Patrizia is impressive, especially since there is a tonal shift in the film. Where Patrizia is initially charming and confident, she becomes desperate and troubled in the second half of the film as she wants to save her marriage and life from falling apart. This performance will undoubtedly bring Gaga a lot of attention during awards season and may see her receive her second Academy Award acting nomination.

Playing Maurizio Gucci is Adam Driver who turns on the charm as the heir to the Gucci Empire. Initially seeming reluctant to join the family business, Maurizio risks being cut off from the family when he falls in love with Patrizia, a woman who doesn’t have the same affluent background. However, as the film shifts into darker territory, we begin to see Maurizio lose his initial sense of self and individuality as he becomes the person he swore he would never be. Driver conveys Maurizio’s shift from aspiring lawyer to manipulative businessman perfectly as it doesn’t happen all of a sudden as he is pushed to carry out various schemes alongside Patrizia in a bid to control the Gucci brand. What is great about Driver is that he is a performer who can say so much without many words and this is important when it comes to Maurizio’s characterisation as he is a lot quieter and more observant than Patrizia.

One of the most conflicting aspects of the film is the supporting performances provided by Jared Leto and Al Pacino who play Paolo and Aldo Gucci, respectively. Paolo and Aldo are often used as comic relief throughout the film, especially aspiring designer Paolo whose fashion taste is questionable as Leto’s portrayal paints Paolo as someone who is completely oblivious while Aldo deals with the finances of the Gucci brand. Leto’s performance, in particular, has garnered a lot of love and hate thanks to its eccentric and over-the-top portrayal which feels brilliant in the context of the film but when taking into consideration the accuracy of the real Paolo Gucci and his life story, it appears as though the film is laughing at him and mocking his misfortune. Leto feeds into the camp and comic aspects of the film thanks to his use of physical comedy that saw him have a complete makeover for the role while Pacino feeds into the darker and dramatic aspects of the film as his version of Aldo fears about losing power and will do anything to hold onto it.

House of Gucci is a film that promises plenty of drama with twists and turns as character alliances shift in a bid to gain control over the family business. In the midst of the drama, it is quite easy to forget that this is based on a true story that had real and tragic consequences which have caused conversation among critics over whether the overall tone is appropriate for the subject matter. Regardless, it is a film that is filled to the brim with fantastic performances, especially from Gaga and Driver, while Yates’ costume design helps to bring the period to life and gives us a visual insight into how the characters express themselves.

What did you think of House of Gucci? Let me know in the comments below!

House of Gucci is out in cinemas now!

Categories
Uncategorised

London Film Festival 2020: Roundup

With London Film Festival concluding today and all of my reviews done and dusted, I thought I would write this post to roundup my experience. Being my first film festival, I was so excited to be apart of something I have been a fan of for years. Looking at the lineup, it seemed that there were four major films: Steve McQueen’s Mangrove, Chloe Zhao’s Nomadland, Pete Docter’s Soul and Francis Lee’s Ammonite and I was determined to see at least two of these. Luckily I was able to see Mangrove and Ammonite on the screenings but sadly wasn’t successful in the ballot to see Nomadland and I don’t live in London to see Soul. However, I was thrilled with all the films I watched. I decided that my target was to watch 10 films and make them as varied as I could. In total, I watched 12 films and this includes documentaries, shorts, animation, drama, horror, foreign language, etc. There wasn’t one film that disappointed me and many standouts that I hope go on to receive award recognition and open new doors to create more films.

Overall, what stood out to me was the quality of the writing in the films I watched which was absolutely fantastic. The creativity and originality of the films I watched shows that the industry isn’t failing and there is room for films that push boundaries. From adaptations to original pieces, each film was so distinctive and unique that I was so pleased with how many well-rounded characters there were.

I thought it would be fun to come up with my personal winners from the Festival from the films I watched. As I previously said, there were no disappointments so this will be tricky. I have also added a special Shoutout category because the winner of this gave two brilliant performances and has clearly had a stellar year. I wanted to recognise this with their own special category.

Here are the Smaller Pictures Winners of London Film Festival:

Best Picture Wolfwalkers

Best Director – Tomm Moore and Ross Stewart for Wolfwalkers

Best Leading Actor – Riz Ahmed for Mogul Mowgli

Best Leading Actress – Tilda Swinton for The Human Voice

Best Supporting Actor – Fazlur Rahman Babu for The Salt in Our Waters (Nonajoler Kabbo)

Best Supporting Actress – Letitia Wright for Mangrove

Best Original Screenplay – Will Collins for Wolfwalkers

Best Adapted Screenplay – Pedro Almodóvar for The Human Voice

Best Documentary FeatureOne Man and His Shoes

Best Original Score – Jim Williams for Possessor

Best Song – “Running with the Wolves”, AURORA from Wolfwalkers

Best Cinematography – Stéphane Fontaine for Ammonite

Best Editing – Matthew Hannam for Possessor

Best Production Design – Tomm Moore, Ross Stewart and Maria Pareja for Wolfwalkers

Best Costume Design – Michael O’Connor for Ammonite

Best Hair and MakeupThe Human Voice

Special Shoutout Winner – Sean Bean for Wolfwalkers and Possessor

London Film Festival has given me some amazing memories and been a highlight of my year and a brilliant opportunity that I am so grateful for. I am also so excited to announce that I will be reviewing films from the upcoming Raindance Film Festival at the end of this month so my Festival journey hasn’t ended just yet!

So that’s it for my little awards section and roundup! Which film are you looking forward to seeing the most? Let me know in the comments below!

Just in case you want to read my reviews for the films, I have included them below. I really recommend watching all of them:

Ammonite

Farewell Amor

Herself

The Human Voice

Lovers Rock

Mangrove

Mogul Mowgli

One Man and His Shoes

Possessor

The Salt in Our Waters (Nonajoler Kabbo)

Siberia

Wolfwalkers

Categories
Uncategorised

London Film Festival 2020: Ammonite

One of the final films for this year’s London Film Festival comes in the form of Francis Lee’s Ammonite. Written and directed by Lee, the film follows Victorian palaeontologist Mary Anning and her time spent with Charlotte Murchison who would eventually become a palaeontologist herself. Starring Oscar winner Kate Winslet and Oscar nominee Saoirse Ronan as Anning and Murchison, respectively, Ammonite is a slow burning romance filled with beautiful cinematography and boasting a host of stellar performances. It premiered at Toronto Film Festival and was one of the most talked about films coming into London Film Festival so I was excited to have a chance to watch it.

Shot on location at the Jurassic Coast at Lyme Regis, Ammonite is just as hard and cold as its surroundings with Anning’s character specifically being chipped away at like one her fossils until we see her true self revealed. Francis Lee brings in a unique perspective by adding in a lesbian storyline due to Anning’s privacy regarding her personal life and with the knowledge that she never married or had children. There is no proof to say she was a lesbian but there isn’t any proof to say otherwise and the film hasn’t been written as confirmed history. What is fact, however, is that Anning’s life was full of injustices. From the offset, Anning’s injustices are seen as the fossil she uncovered is placed in the British Museum and her name is replaced by a man’s. This happens before we even see her onscreen. Our introduction to Anning is quite literally the science community erasing women from the narrative.

As expected, Kate Winslet is perfect casting as Mary Anning. Stubborn and guarded, Anning sees through the grandeur and spectacle of the male dominated science community. Bringing her best performance in years, Winslet’s Anning longs for happiness but shuts herself away from it, deciding to focus on her work. Even when she initially meets Roderick and Charlotte Murchison, she is reluctant and unhappy to give them a private audience as she prefers her own company. However, we see her facade fade away as she nurses Charlotte back to health after she contracts a fever. Anning longs to be among the elite in society but knows that she never will. Charlotte has everything she wants and even when presented with the opportunity to join her, Anning doesn’t want to be in a submissive position. Winslet plays Anning with strength and resilience that both aids and damages the character.

Saoirse Ronan’s performance as Charlotte Murchison puts her back in the familiar period setting that she excels in. Murchison is consumed by mental illness following the loss of her baby and is sent to shadow Anning at the insistence of her husband who goes travelling for five months. She is timid and quiet and quickly clashes with Anning’s brash character. After falling ill, Charlotte has a new outlook on life and grows attached Mary which slowly blossoms into a romance between them. As the film’s focus is mainly on Anning, I would say Ronan doesn’t shine as much as Winslet because we don’t get to know Charlotte to the same extent. I would have loved to have seen a more developed character arc for her or perhaps a note at the end of the film to confirm her own successful career as a palaeontologist. Ronan does the best with the material she has, however, and is a great onscreen match with Winslet. It’s hard to believe that it has taken so long to have these two powerhouses acting alongside each other.

The costume design by Michael O’Connor is a highlight in the film, particularly the handmade knit pieces the two leads wear. Anning’s weave and rib knit jumper is a beautiful and practical piece that has the robustness to reflect her profession and personality. On the other hand, Murchison’s delicate white knitted shawl is so fragile it could be lace. It is so fresh and clean which contrasts with the mud laden beach. Anning’s clothes are predominantly dark greys and blues and reflect the bleak coastal scenery with Murchison’s more bright and lavish outfits commanding the centre of attention in all of her scenes.

Overall, Ammonite shows Francis Lee’s skill with colour and vision, giving a voice to an overlooked woman in science. His boldness and imagination to suggest a different narrative doesn’t take away from Anning’s confirmed achievements. Lee has cemented himself as a director to watch with this strong follow-up to his 2017 debut, God’s Own Country.

Ammonite is screening at the London Film Festival on the 17th October and will be released in the United Kingdom in 2021.

Categories
Uncategorised

The Tales of Hoffmann (1951)

This classic from the directors Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger (collectively known as ‘The Archers’) has had somewhat of a resurgence in years of late. Based on the 1881 Jacques Offenbach opera of the same name which in turn is inspired by stories from E.T.A Hoffmann, The Tales of Hoffmann is a performative experience that combines opera, dance and cinema creating a final product that is more than just a film. Expectedly stunning in its visuals, flawless soundtrack and larger than life cast, The Tales of Hoffmann follows the titular character (played by Robert Rounseville) who reminisces on three love affairs that ended sadly when reflecting on a new love that he has for the ballet dancer, Stella (Moira Shearer). The opera is sung in English rather than its original French with the soundtrack composed by Sir Thomas Beecham. If The Red Shoes showed the dark side of ballet in its subtleties through the psychological breakdown of its protagonist, The Tales of Hoffmann does so in a way that is more light-hearted and comical.

With the exception of a few minor changes, the film is relatively faithful to the opera and as such is sung throughout. Only Rounseville and Ann Ayars (who plays Hoffmann’s third lover, Antonia) sing as well as act their roles. Having other people dub for actors is not uncommon during this period in filmmaking with Powell and Pressburger even adding the singers onscreen for the curtain call credits at the end of the film. The Archers’ appreciation for the arts shines through as ever in their meticulous attention to detail. It is clear that everything is well thought out and that each movement is dictated by the music whilst still remaining true to their style.

The set-up of the three stories sees its characters discussing their plots against Hoffmann in a bid to ruin him of his pride, money and career as we see him grow from a perspective student to affluent poet in the film’s duration. Robert Rounseville is superb as the titular Hoffmann and draws the audience in even when he isn’t singing. He is brilliantly reactive and attentive to what the other characters are singing. Hoffmann thinks on his feet but is incredibly stubborn at the same time with his companion Nicklaus (Pamela Brown) trying to warn him of sinister plots that befall him. The villain in the main story, Lindorf, is played by Robert Helpmann who also plays the antagonists in the three segments: Coppelius, Dapertutto and Doctor Miracle. This decision to reflect the opera was a brave choice because if done wrong it could look too forced and too stagey but Helpmann’s performance is fantastic and he manages to bring different personalities and mannerisms to each character. Lindorf is much more controlled and quiet in comparison to Coppelius who is loud and erratic.

Playing the women we have Moira Shearer who plays both Stella and Hoffmann’s first live, the robotic, Olympia, Ludmilla Tcherina plays the Venetian courtesan Giulietta who seduces Hoffmann for his shadow and Ann Ayars as Antonia who is slowly succumbing to consumption. The role of Olympia particularly is hugely sought thanks to her aria which is a standout in both the opera and the film, therefore it makes sense that The Archers picked Shearer who had recently played the lead in their previous film, 1948’s hugely successful The Red Shoes. A big decision Powell and Pressburger made was to prioritise dance and so Shearer is able to focus on her strength while Liverpudlian coloratura soprano, Dorothy Bond provides the singing. It is a beautifully delicate rendition. Tcherina on the other hand is miles away from her previous support role in The Red Shoes where she played lovestruck dancer, Irina. Her performance of Giulietta is seductive and manipulative. She is guided by the light of the glittering gems that adorn her neck and does not fear the consequences for those around her. The final segment which sees Ann Ayers as the ill-fated Antonia who lives with her disapproving father, Crespel. Antonia longs to see Hoffmann again and it seems as though Hoffmann has finally found the love of his life but it isn’t to be. The scene in which Antonia is poisoned by the evil Doctor Miracle is fantastically shot as she runs across her bedroom, opens one door and ends up at the other side of the same room. It makes for a surreal and terrifying scene that escalates quickly in its tension.

The costume design and production design by Hein Heckroth earned well-deserved Oscar nominations and it’s easy to see why. The brilliant thing about Powell and Pressburger films is that they seem contained in their own universes and this is largely thanks in part to the crew who do an amazing job at creating the lavish sets. The Tales of Hoffmann is a film that screams opulence and requires multiple watches to appreciate every scene. Heckroth had won an Oscar for Best Art Direction for The Red Shoes and he does not falter here. From the delicacy of Olympia’s dress to the offlandish and dishevelled suit that Coppelius are among the costume highlights and the Venetian set is remarkably detailed and exquisite.

The Tales of Hoffmann demands the audience attention and makes for a fantastic viewing experience. It feels as though Powell and Pressburger had worked to get to this point where they act as both director and composers. Their passion is felt through the film and it is wonderfully characteristic and deserves the attention it has been receiving as of late.

Have you seen The Tales of Hoffmann? Let me know in the comments below!