Tag: writing

Categories
Uncategorised

Hayao Miyazaki: Film Ranking

It’s hard not to think about Hayao Miyazaki when choosing what anime film to watch. Known as one of the founders of the Japanese animation powerhouse Studio Ghibli, Miyazaki has established a name among critics and audiences alike as an important figure in helping Japanese cinema reach a global audience with films that are suitable for all ages. So far, Studio Ghibli has only won one film in the Best Animated Feature category which is for Miyazaki’s masterpiece Spirited Away (2001) which, in my opinion, remains the best overall winner in this category. I do think there are times when a Ghibli production should have walked away with the award but sadly, releases directly from Disney Studios tend to dominate the category almost every year.

Ghibli is reliable and consistent, bringing out films that challenge our perceptions on the society we live in by incorporating more mature issues such as loss, mankind’s treatment of nature and identity. There are other directors who have also helped to bring Ghibli the reputation it has today such as Isao Takahata who I will also be writing a separate ranking for but in the meantime, let’s delve into the films of the one and only Hayao Miyazaki.

Here is a mini write up for each in chronological order followed by my ranking at the end of the article:

The Castle of Cagliostro (1979)

Miyazaki’s debut comes in the form of this action packed adventure based on the Lupin III manga series following thief Lupin and his partner Jigen after they successfully rob the Monte Carlo Casino only to find that the money is counterfeit. They travel to Cagliostro, the rumoured source of the counterfeit enterprise in a bid to put an end to the ordeal. The film is credited with being an inspiration to the likes of Raiders of the Lost Ark and The Great Mouse Detective. It’s clearly not completely controlled by Miyazaki himself as it was made before Ghibli’s inception but there are some signature Miyazaki traits that are noticable in hindsight such as the exaggerated expressions and the mix of humour and drama. It’s a faster-paced film than the usual Miyazaki action films but it doesn’t feel rushed. Lupin is a great character and the writing ensures the audience is gripped. Another highlight in this film is the score by Yuji Ohno which has Pink Panther vibes and really helps to elevate the film-watching experience. I think that this film marks a very strong start to what was evidently the beginning of one of the most exciting film careers in Japanese cinema history.

Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind (1984)

The first film created by the founders of Studio Ghibli comes in the form of this brilliant dystopic epic set in a world where the Toxic Jungle, a forest filled with giant, poisonous insects threatens to eliminate the last of the human race. Though released before Ghibli was officially founded, Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind is commonly considered a Ghibli and has been re-released under the Ghibli banner. The film follows the titular character as she strives to find a way for the insects and humans to co-exist. Based on the manga series of the same name by Miyazaki, who also adapted it into a screenplay, Nausicaä isn’t afraid to delve into deep issues and question its younger audience. Focusing on the themes of mankind vs nature which would prove to be an underlying topic in subsequent Miyazaki features, the film is also unafraid to showcase loss and fractured relationships. It’s also refreshing to see a female protagonist whose strength is never questioned and is accepted for what it is, another trait that Miyazaki showcases in each of his Ghibli produced films.

Castle in the Sky (1986)

The first official feature to be released under the Studio Ghibli is the action-adventure Castle in the Sky. The film follows Pazu, a young boy who works in the mine of his local village who comes across a girl, Sheeta, who floats down from the sky. They are soon chased by pirates and government agents in a bid to track down the secret locating the mysterious floating island, Laputa, that Sheeta may hold the key to find. I have written a fuller review on this film that you can read here but it is truly a dazzling achievement. The scope and detail in the animation is remarkable and the score by Joe Hisaishi feels timeless. Although it is not as popular as Miyazaki’s later films, I think that Castle in the Sky is such a thrilling and impactful film that has a lot to say on mankind’s relationship with nature, the importance of the environment and people’s relationships with each other. Both protagonists work together to find a peaceful solution against the people who want to use Laputa and its materials for weaponary and world domination.

My Neighbor Totoro (1988)

Arguably the most iconic Studio Ghibli film, My Neighbor Totoro follows sisters Mei and Satsuki as they move into an old house with their father so they can be closer to their mother who is recovering in hospital from a long-term illness. The two girls eventually encounter an array of spirits, including one that lives in the nearby forest who Mei names Totoro and the enigmatic Catbus that provides transport for the spirits. It’s a wonderful film that provides the perfect introduction for younger children to Studio Ghibli. Unlike its predecessors, My Neighbor Totoro is a lot more innocent and childlike in its design and message. This doesn’t prevent it from being a brilliant film, however, as it does a great job on touching on family dynamics, childhood and loss. It has a lighter feel and very striking design, particularly the Catbus who conveys the tone of the film without even saying anything. What is brilliant about Miyazaki’s world is how he integrates traditional Japanese folklore with his own imagination and artistry and My Neighbor Totoro is a beautiful example of this.

Kiki’s Delivery Service (1989)

Following on his successful streak, Miyazaki brings another film geared towards younger children in this lovely tale about a younger witch, Kiki, who sets off to find out what she wants to do with her life. Accompanied by her cat Jiji, Kiki is fascinated by the normal human world and understandably finds it hard to fit in as she is not like them. The film is all about understanding accepting our differences and how we can use them to the our advantage. Kiki is a great protagonist for the younger demographic as she is a strong female who is flawed but she works on those flaws. She is a well-rounded character and it showcases Miyazaki’s strength in being able to create characters that audiences of all age can relate to on some level. It’s not the strongest installment in Miyazaki’s filmography but that doesn’t mean it is a bad film at all. Miyazaki’s work is of such high calibre that it just misses out on the top tier of films for me but it is still an absolute joy to watch.

Porco Rosso (1992)

The last film Miyazaki to be made before he took his first hiatus is a more detailed look into the filmmakers interest with aircraft. Porco Rosso follows the titular character who was a human but was cursed and is now a pig who works as a pilot bounty hunter who catches pirates in the Adriatic Sea. It’s a fun-filled adventure that has inklings of Castle in the Sky with the over the top pirates and allows Miyazaki to go deep on his own family heritage of working in aircraft. Joe Hisaishi’s score is fantastic as always and strikes the right upbeat tone that the film has. For me the film’s highlight comes in the scene in which Rosso sees his dead friends flying in the sky in his own version of heaven. It’s a fantastic scene that lifts the whole standard of the film. It is my least favourite Miyazaki film as it does have some flaws that I cannot overlook particularly the treatment of Fio, a teenage woman who aspires to engineer and make planes. A few jokes and quips made by the pirates are thrown her way that I feel are inappropriate for the younger audience. Fio herself is strongly written and is a brilliantly resilient young woman who is unfazed by working in a strongly male-dominated industry but the comments made by other characters could have been removed and still maintain the toxic masculine environment that Miyazaki was wanting to portray.

Princess Mononoke (1997)

Miyazaki returned after 5 years to make this brilliant epic based on traditional Japanese folklore and spirits. Princess Mononoke is fable on mankind’s takeover of nature and the subsequent consequences that this has. Following Eastern Prince Ashitaka who is cursed by a giant boar god who he kills, he must venture West to Irontown, a place filled with revolutionary industrial technology that threatens to takeover the forest by mining the sources underground. On arrival, he comes across San, a human girl raised by the Wolf gods who violently attacks and attempts to kill the leader of Irontown, Lady Eboshi, any chance she can. The film is by far Miyazaki’s most violent and graphic film thanks to its abundance of blood and graphic injury from the offset. Miyazaki always has a large scope in his imagination but Princess Mononoke has such a richness in detail that I think brings it to another tier. From the larger than life forest spirits to Joe Hisaishi’s spectacular score which is my favourite soundtrack from any Studio Ghibli film. I have written a longer review that you can read here. Despite its Medieval Japanese setting, there is a timelessness in the message that Miyazaki it wanting to convey and I think that that is why it resonates with so many people.

Spirited Away (2001)

The film that finally gave Miyazaki a long-awaited Oscar, Spirited Away is usaully the go-to film that beginners to Ghibli go for and with good reason. Following Chihiro, a young girl forced to move away with her parents and is sad to leave her friends, Spirited Away sees the family accidentally trespass on the land of the spirits. After her parents are turned into pigs, Chihiro must work in the Bathhouse while she figures out a way to get her parents back and return home. This film is nothing short of a masterpiece between the wide array of memorable characters as we venture in the spirit world including Haku, a young man who befriends Chihiro and No-Face, a mysterious spirit who suddenly appears and causes mayhem. Everything about it is iconic and it really is a beautiful film to watch. I have done a longer review which you can read here but words really don’t do this film justice.

Howl’s Moving Castle (2004)

Probably the most accessible Miyazaki film storywise, Howl’s Moving Castle is based on the best-selling book by Diana Wynn Jones and follows SOphie, a young woman discontent with her appearance who is cursed by the Witch of the Waste and turned into an old woman. She is then picked up by the mysterious Moving Castle and agrees to work as a cleaning lady for wizard Howl. The film is gloriously magical and is filled with whimiscal design which has made it a favourite amongst fans. The Wales-inspired landscapes are beautiful and vast and some maintain a very high level of detail that remains captivating long after the first viewing. This world that Sophie lives in differs to that of Howl, who longs for beauty and perfection in a world ridden with darkness and chaos. He refuses to take part in the war that is tearing the country apart and provides a bleak backdrop to the natural beauty where the story takes place. Hisaishi’s score is wonderful as always with the main theme waltz reminiscent of a merry-go-round piece. What Miyazaki does so well that he incorporates into this film particularly is showing how blurred the lines are between good and evil.

Ponyo (2008)

After his second hiatus, Miyazaki returns with another film geared towards the younger audience that follows Brunhilde, a goldfish who lives in the sea with her father and sisters, who escapes and is captured in a glass jar by a young human boy called Sōsuke. Brunhilde develops a desire to become human and changes her name to Ponyo after she is accidentally fed blood after Sōsuke shatters the jar which cuts him. Based on The Little Mermaid by Hans Christian Anderson, Ponyo is a less traditional retelling of the fairytale but still maintains Miyazaki’s vision and charm irregardless. It is an adorable film about friendship and love and despite there being hints towards a negative shift in the balance of nature due to Ponyo’s wishes, it still remains upbeat. Despite her young age, Ponyo is a strong-willed character who knows that she is out of place at the start but doesn’t understand why and makes it her mission to discover where she belongs.

The Wind Rises (2013)

The lastest Miyazaki feature to be released is absolutely astounding and comes in the form of The Wind Rises, which follows protagonist Jiro Horikoshi, an aircraft designer who works for Mitsubishi during World War II. Based on the manga by Miyazaki, it clearly is a project that the director is passionate about and I think this is emphasised by his realistic approach and design. The film tells the story of an aspiring pilot who eventually becomes an aircraft designer due to his poor eyesight and shows him falling in love with a young woman he meets. The Wind Rises is absolutely beautiful and everything about it from its writing and character design to the score by Hisaishi is flawless. Like most of the other Studio Ghibli films released since the inception of the Best Animated feature Award at the Oscars, this was nominated and it expectedly lost to Frozen but I personally would have given my note to this film because the passion that is conveyed goes beyond Miyazaki’s previous projects.

Unlike a lot of directors, there aren’t as many films that Miyazaki has directed in his 40 year career but that is because creating his films is time-consuming due to his insistence that they stick to hand-drawing their images. In the last 3 years, only 36 minutes have been created for his next feature How Do You Live? which Miyazaki has advised is his last film before retiring for the third (or fourth?) time. The calibre of his films is so high so even the ones that rank a bit lower are so strong in quality. Miyazaki has a reputation that many film-makers and lovers dream of and I have seen these films multiple times and will undoubtedly watch them again and again.

Anywho, here is my final ranking:

1) Castle in the Sky (1986)

2) The Wind Rises (2013)

3) Princess Mononoke (1997)

4) Spirited Away (2001)

5) Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind (1984)

6) Howl’s Moving Castle (2004)

7) Ponyo (2010)

8) My Neighbor Totoro (1988)

9) The Castle of Cagliostro (1979)

10) Kiki’s Delivery Service (1989)

11) Porco Rosso (1992)

So there we have it! What do you think of my list? Which Miyazaki film is your favourite? Let me know in the comments below!

 

Categories
Uncategorised

Top 5 Michael Fassbender Performances

One of the best actors working today without a doubt is Michael Fassbender. Born in Germany and raised in Ireland, Fassbender’s career has gone strength to strength showcasing his range from small-budget indies to massive blockbuster franchises. Garnering critical and commercial acclaim winning a slew of awards including the Venice Film Festival’s Volpi Cup for Best Actor (for Shame) as well as two Academy Award nominations for Best Actor in a Leading Role and Best Actor in a Supporting Role (for Steve Jobs and 12 Years a Slave, respectively). Fassbender never fails to push the bar and standout in whatever film he is. He has worked with a variety of huge directors such as Steve McQueen, Quentin Tarantino, Ridley Scott and Danny Boyle to name a few and is currently working on Taika Waititi’s new film Next Goal Wins.

There are so many performances that I could list but I managed to compile a list of my top favourite performances which I think are the best of the best. Hopefully if anything, this list will demonstrate the range that Fassbender displays from an Irish activist on a hunger strike to an English soldier in World War II to an American billionaire. He has really established himself as one of the most exciting method actors working in Hollywood today.

Without further ado, here are my top 5 Michael Fassbender performances in chronological order:

Hunger (2008)

The role that catapulted Fassbender to the A List is not one to be overlooked. The first collaboration between Fassbender and  Steve McQueen already shows the fearlessness that they both have in their filmmaking and the roles that Fassbender chooses to take on. Fassbender plays IRA member Bobby Sands who takes part in a hunger strike for 66 days and also participates in a no-wash strike. The film also marks McQueen’s feature debut and won him the Camera d’Or at Cannes Film Festival. McQueen’s minimalist direction combined with a character driven script includes an incredible 17 minute shot in which Bobby is challenged to end his protest by Father Moran (Liam Cunningham). What Fassbender does so well in this film and his subsequent performances is his ability to pull off performances that are memorable but not over the top. What Hunger does is allow the focus to be on the performances of the actors because the film doesn’t have bells and whistles and special effects. Fassbender’s performance earned him a British Independent Film Award for Best Leading Actor and it’s easy to see why. His preparation for the role is evident in his dramatic weightloss pre-production. Hunger proves to be a great start when looking at the filmography for Fassbender as it shows his willingness to pick good roles and his dedication to method acting.  

Inglourious Basterds (2009)

Following his stellar lead in Hunger, Fassbender starred in Quentin Tarantino’s fantastic revenge thriller Inglourious Basterds which is a fictional retelling of Nazi-occupied France during the peak of the War. The cast is led by Brad Pitt as Aldo Raine, the leader of the Basterds and stars Christoph Waltz in an Oscar-winning dazzling supporting turn as SS Officer Hans Landa, the latter of which was the major talking point for critics and audiences alike and with good reason. ANother brilliant aspect that comes from this film is Michael Fassbender’s small role as Leiutenant Archie Hicox, an English soldier drafted to France to assist the Basterds with their plan. His role is only short-lived in the film but what he lacks in screentime, he makes up for with charisma. Fassbender is memorable as the quick-witted soldier as he struggles to fit in with the others who are hellbent on revenge. The scene in the underground bar remains one of the best Tarantino moments and it’s largely thanks to Fassbender’s control of the character. As expected in a Tarantino film, the characters are larger than life and it’s clear that Fassbender is enjoying playing Hicox. As mentioned before, this is only a small role but it is a rewarding point in Fassbender’s career as it shows he can standout in a star-studded cast.

Shame (2011)

Fassbender’s second collaboration with Steve McQueen is a deeply explicit look at sex addiction. Fassbender plays Brandon, a high-living bachelor living in New York who is constantly having sex with prostitutes and masturbating in his workplace where he holds an Executive position. Brandon’s addiction is initially his lifestyle. Just like any other addiction, he is subconsciously engaging with sex in any way he can. The film documents the downward spiral Brandon experiences as his lifestyle begins to fall apart with the arrival of his self-harming sister, Sissy (Carey Mulligan) who stays at Brandon’s apartment as she has a few gigs as a lounge singer in the City. Sissy is openly lonely and upset, longing to bridge the broken relationship with her brother who has deluded himself into believing that he is not alone because he is constantly engaging with sex in some way or other. It is the slow-burning realisation that he is alone and that he is incapable of forming “real” connections that make way for Brandon’s downfall. The film earned an NC-17 rating in the US thanks to its explicit scenes which includes Fassbender appearing full-frontal. In an industry where full female nudity has become normalised, there is still a stigma around showing full male nudity. This role is understandably challenging and uncomfortable but Fassbender gives everything to the film. Brandon is deeply flawed and is looking for the puzzle piece that is missing in his life. Fassbender won a second British Independent FIlm Award for Best Lead Actor for his performance. It’s not the lightest film to watch by any means but it is an unafraid look into a common topic that is taboo in a very realist way.

12 Years a Slave (2013)

The third and (to date) latest collaboration between Fassbender and Steve McQueen is an adaptation of the memoir of the same name by Solomon Northup, a New York-born man who is kidnapped and sold into slavery in Louisiana in 1841. Featuring Chiwetel Ejiofor as Northup, Fassbender portrays plantation owner Edwin Epps, a despicable and inhumane person who takes pleasure in beating and raping the slaves who work for him. Fassbender is truly terrifying as Epps and the performance gives goosebumps due to his unpredictability. The scene in which he demands Northup whip Patsey (Lupita Nyong’o) and then proceeds to violently do so himself to a point where she almost dies is horrific to watch and shows a fearlessness in Fassbender’s performance. He is clearly not afraid to go the extra mile and show Epp’s evilness while keeping complete control of the character. This performance shows a different side to Fassbender’s range that we have not seen before, even in his previous antagonist roles. Epps is a man void of compassion and embodies evil incarnate. Thanks to McQueen realist and relentless direction, Fassbender successfully shows this and really gets under the skin of the character and presents this to the audience in a way that no filmmaker has done before. Everyone in the cast does justice to Northup’s story, especially Ejiofor, Nyongo’o and Fassbender, garnering awards attention for each. Fassbender was nominated for his first Academy Award for Best Actor in a Supporting Role.

Steve Jobs (2015)

My favourite Fassbender performances sees him take on the titular character in this Danny Boyle biopic. Fassbender practically becomes the Apple CEO and co-founder as we follow Job’s life from the launch of the Mac that lead to his firing ending with the launch of the iMac which is seen as his Apple comeback. It is such a subtle masterclass of acting that you forget that you are watching an actor. He perfects the accent, the mannerisms and manages to create a deeply complex character that allows the audience to form their on opinions on the man. Aaron Sorkin’s script is a brilliant foundation that Fassbender takes and adds that extra dimension to the film. It is his command of the screen that constantly grabs the audience’s attention and elevates the film to something more than a biopic. The film also features a strong supporting cast led by Kate Winslet, Seth Rogan and Michael Stuhlbarg but it is Fassbender’s lead turn that will leave a lasting imprint long after the film’s ended. The scene in which Jobs and Steve Wozniak (Rogan) argue whether the former should acknowledge the Apple II team in his speech at both computer launches. Jobs is clearly a highly intelligent man but his stubborness and pride hinders him and makes him appear alien and detached from those around him. Fassbender was deservedly nominated for the whole round of major awards and, in my opinion, I think he should have won because the performance is top tier. However, this was the year that Leonardo DiCaprio won all of the awards for his brilliant turn in The Revenant which made the competition one of very high standards.

It’s clear that Fassbender thrives in an environment where he is given challenging and different material. He clearly is wanting to consistently show more range and depth by starring in different genres and working with varying directors and budgets. He is an actor who wants to challenge topical taboos and portray characters who bring discussions among critics and audiences alike. I know that there are tons of performances I could have included such as his performance as Connor in Fish Tank, Magneto in the rebooted X-Men franchise and the titular role in Frank but each of the films I listed are the real standouts in terms of him pushing his range and his charaterisations. I look forward to seeing him in Waititi’s new film and what roles he takes in the future. hopefully this will include a film that sees him sweep the major awards that he is long overdue.

What are your favourite Michael Fassbender performances? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

1917 (2019)

1917 is a World War I epic that seems to be the one to beat when it comes to the Best Picture award. Co-written, directed and produced by Sam Mendes, the film acts as a tribute to his grandfather, Alfred Mendes, based on stories that he would tell about the war. Following two young soldiers, Schofield (George MacKay) and Blake (Dean-Charles Chapman) who are tasked with travelling across enemy lines to warn off a British attack before they fall into a trap set by the Germans. The film has become well-regarded for its flawless editing, designed to look like two continuous shots. As well as beautiful technique, 1917 also boasts a stunning cast that includes well-loved actor of the big screen such as Colin Firth and Benedict Cumberbatch as well as TV favourites such as Daniel Mays and Andrew Scott. As expected, Mendes delivers and the continuous shots and editing only exemplify the non-stop nature of war. There is only one point in which the audience is allowed to relax at the start of the third act of the film. The writing is simple as Mendes lays focus on the physicality and the atmosphere rather than the dialogue. There are few monologues and those with speeches such as Andrew Scott’s Lieutenant Leslie are at rare moments of stand still. Co-written by Mendes and Krysty Wilson-Cairns, the script is minimalist in dialogue. Even when following the two Lance Corporals on their journey, we never really hear Schofield’s backstory because he is so withdrawn. One brilliant scene is when Schofield is picked up by a passing British unit and they are sat in the back of a truck. Schofield sits silently as the soldiers around him comment on their various backgrounds, imitate their General and comment on whether occupying other countries is worth the damage. It’s a poignant scene which brings in a humane aspect that is often missing from World War films.

The performances are impressive, particularly by George MacKay who is always on camera. He carries the film in the same way that he carries the message to the troops. It is no easy feat as an actor to hold so much pressure from such a big film but MacKay has shown promise from the early days in his career and his subsequent breakout performances in Pride (2014) and Captain Fantastic (2016). 1917 exploits MacKay to a mainstream audience that he won’t have been subject to in such a way previously. His Lance Corporal Schofield is reluctant to go on the mission and keeps his cards close to his chest but his determination to see it through is fearless, particularly in the final scenes as he runs through the trenches. Schofield and Blake appear to have different takes for their mission at the beginning. Blake is insistent on setting off immediately whereas Schofield logically believes in waiting until dark. Because of the emotional stake that Blake has in the mission (his brother is among the troops heading into the trap), Schofield has to ensure that Blake’s heart doesn’t lead his head.

1917

The two protagonists balance each other out as Blake risks his own life to save Schofield when a bomb is set off in a German trench. Chapman is also fantastic as Blake who appears naïve due to his sentimental nature. When encountering a German soldier whose plane was shot down in a dogfight, Blake’s gut reaction is to assist and get the soldier some water to ease the pain whereas Schofield doesn’t hesitate to shoot at the enemy. As mentioned before, the supporting cast is littered with stars from the small and silver screens. Admittedly, the supporting cast are granted one scene each so it’s more of a cameo, but each actor makes the most of their moments. Andrew Scott particularly delivers a brilliant monologue as a Lieutenant who has little hope in winning the war whereas Benedict Cumberbatch’s Colonel Mackenzie views he retreat from battle as a sign of defeat. The fleeting appearances from the supporting characters is thanks to the perfectly linear narrative of the film itself. We see the two Lance Corporals setting off to warn the Devonshire Regiment and ending with Schofield sat beside a tree in a mirror image of the opening shot.

It would be a big misjustice not to mention the revolutionary cinematography and editing provided by Roger Deakins and Lee Smith, respectively. Both men are at the top of the game in their respected fields and they work fantastically as a team. What these men have managed to achieve feels as claustrophobic and in your face as the war itself. There are many comments from people saying that the continuous effect took some getting used to but for me it felt natural and flowed perfectly. The editing is in a similar vein to the technique used in Birdman but on a bigger scale. What Deakins does so brilliantly is simultaneously provide big explosions shots filled with action while also maintaining great focus on the individual protagonists’ faces. Despite everything that is going on around the soldiers, the audiences’ eyes are fixated on the characters. Deakins’ colour palette is muted as expected in a war film with greens and browns. There are no exaggerated colours or futuristic spectacles. Deakins ensures that the film is very much grounded in its reality. Together, Deakins and Smith manage to create a film that is visually captivating and stunning, making the best use of the environment given and its limited landscapes.

19172

On the musical side of things, Thomas Newman’s score for this film is beyond incredible and has deservedly earned him his 15th Academy Award nomination. This year has seen a strong competition in the score category with both Thomas and Randy Newman pulling punches for their scores for 1917 and Marriage Story, respectively. Undoubtedly, the Best Original Score gong will go to Hildur Guðnadóttir for her stellar work on Joker making her the first woman to walk away with the award. It shouldn’t go unnoticed, however, that Thomas Newman’s score is among his best. Much like the editing, the film is reliant on its score which acts like a thread connecting the scenes. Needless to say, if Newman does end up winning, I wouldn’t be disappointed.

Overall, 1917 has proven to be a much better film than I had originally anticipated and I found myself moved and stunned by the technical and artistic achievement that Mendes has managed to pull off. I’m not sure if it’s a film that you need to watch more than once as I personally got everything out of the film that I needed in one go. I imagine that in time, it will become renowned and known for its technical aspects and the uniqueness in that field rather than the characters.

What do you think of 1917? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Yentl (1983)

Barbra Streisand’s directorial debut follows the titular character (Streisand), a young woman living in an Ashkenazi Jewish community in the early 20th century who disguises as a man to study in a Yeshiva after her father passes away. Based on the short story by Isaac Bashevis Singer and cowritten by Streisand and Jack Rosenthal, Yentl is a film about subverting the cultural and societal norm as well as conflicts between religion and morality. Yentl Mendel is constantly questioning the way of life in her village and is looked down upon by the townspeople for being unmarried with no prospect of settling down. It is only when she disguises as a man called Anshel that she finds a place of belonging and her views are accepted and even celebrated. Problems occur when Yentl begins to fall in love with her mentor, Avigdor (Mandy Patinkin) who is in love with his ex-fiancée Hadass (Amy Irving) who then in turn falls in love with Anshel. It is the very definition of a love triangle and allows the film to have some lighter moments such as Anshel and Hadass’ wedding night. Winning Streisand a Best Director award at the Golden Globes making her the first and to date only woman to win the accolade, Yentl marks a huge step for female filmmakers in the mainstream thanks to its star appeal and critical and commercial success.

Streisand as director is really remarkable. You can sense the passion that she has for this film. Although there are trademark comedic moments and musical numbers that are identifiable with a Streisand picture, there is no doubt that the dramatic elements and aesthetic allow Streisand to explore a darker approach that we hadn’t really seen from her on film previously. Streisand’s female gaze gives this film a new perspective that we haven’t seen before in film. Instead of condemning Yentl’s choices, we view Anshel as a sensitive man who isn’t afraid of his vulnerability despite living in a male dominated environment. Where it not for Streisand’s feminine interpretation, the performance of Anshel could have slipped into caricature and taken away from the mature themes that the film discusses. Streisand lends a heavy feminist focus as she disputes why a woman cannot have the same outlook and expectation of a man while still appreciating the jobs that the women do. Yentl can be viewed as a crossover between genders and she doesn’t really fit in and altering her gender isn’t an issue. The pursuit of knowledge and equality overtakes the ideals expected of her. There are so many different readings that could be made when watching this film. It has been argued that Yentl could be considered as a queer film thanks to its discussions on gender and sexuality which adds a more progressive meaning to the story.

yentl.jpg

In terms of her performance, it’s best to view Streisand as playing two roles rather than one such is her success in distinctly differentiating the two. Her Yentl is typical Streisand: sassy, witty and strong with an ambition to subvert the norm. This is the Streisand that we have grown to love in her previous cinematic outings. What is different about Yentl is that she is aware that she is trapped within her local community. When reciting the Talmud at her father’s funeral, it becomes such a scandal and causes widespread gossip. The transition period between Yentl and Anshel comes from her journey to the Yeshiva which includes her heartbreaking rendition of “Papa, Can You Hear Me?” where Yentl begs her father for forgiveness for her decision to disguise as a man in pursuit of an education. She sits alone in the forest at nighttime with nothing but a candle for light and it is then when the realisation of what she has done comes to fruition. It is also the point where she knows that there is no turning back and thus has to embody the identity of Anshel. Streisand’s Anshel takes a bit of getting used to in the same way as Yentl getting used to her new identity. We witness Anshel practicing his tone of voice and mannerisms, making sure not to appear too feminine without risking his integrity.

Mandy Patinkin does a wonderful job as Avigdor, Anshel’s friend and mentor at the Yeshiva who is initially engaged to Hadass. Avigdor isn’t afraid to be vulnerable to Anshel and his other male friends but the idea of being vulnerable to Hadass or her mother disgusts him. He doesn’t allow himself to get involved in any confrontation and is always calm when in her company. Avigdor seems so progressive when we are first introduced because he is so accepting of Anshel but it is easy to forget that Anshel is Yentl and he has no idea. When he spouts ideas about a woman’s true place in the home and that Hadass cannot think for herself, it comes across as a shock and ignorant but despite his intelligence, Avigdor is still a product of an environment that looks down on women. In another brilliant supporting turn, Amy Irving was deservedly nominated for an Oscar for Best Supporting Actress in her role as Hadass. When we first meet Hadass, she appears to fulfill all the criteria of the perfect woman and seems to do everything at the men’s commands. What we don’t realise is that she has successfully supressed any feeling of rebellion and it is when she is married to Anshel that she shares her aspirations to learn more. Yentl is in the middle of these two characters and yet it is because of Yentl that they are drawn closer together and allow themselves a more progressive and happier life.

yentl2.png

The amazing music is composed by Michel Legrand, one of the best composers that the film industry had to offer. From his imagination we were given the incredible song “Papa, Can You Hear Me?” composed by Legrand with lyrics written by Alan and Marilyn Bergman. The trio won an Oscar for Best Original Song Score and Its Adaptation or Adaptation Score. In true Legrand fashion, the music is whimsical and brings an essence of fairytale to the story. The musical numbers are far and few between but the score itself is wonderfully subtle when you compare to Legrand’s catalogue such as the music for Les Parapluies De Cherbourg (The Umbrellas of Cherbourg). The songs are suited to Streisand’s amazing vocal range, especially the aforementioned song but rather than being full of show-stopping numbers like the ones in Funny Girl, Legrand makes use of Yentl’s male identity and gives the songs a lower key register so Yentl is singing as if she were a man herself.

Overall, Yentl is a film that has helped pave the way for female filmmakers in mainstream cinema. It is a film not without flaws but it has beauty in its ability to discuss ideas that are considered taboo. Even within the Orthodox setting in the early 20th century, there are still similarities that Streisand is able to get across to link with the modern day. Yentl is not a film that Streisand wishes to make all about herself despite directing and starring in it but the story of how women are often subjected to misogyny and not afforded the chances of their male counterparts. It is equal parts drama and musical and a smaller part comedy which encapsulates Yentl’s character.

What did you think of Yentl? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Bombshell (2019)

One film that has brought much buzz among the acting categories is the Fox News centred biopic Bombshell. Following numerous women working at Fox and their experiences of sexual harassment at the hands of their boss, Roger Ailes, the audience follow the lives of three women at different levels of their careers are observed. At the top of the game there is Megyn Kelly (Charlize Theron), then there is recently fired anchor, Gretchen Carlson (Nicole Kidman) and at the bottom of the tier is newcomer Kayla Pospisil (Margot Robbie) who is based on a culmination of women who worked at Fox. This was not a film I thought would be as gripping or exploitive as it was but this film contains some very upsetting material that shows the trauma that women are forced to endure in order to be successful. The event that acts as a catalyst is Kelly’s encounter with Presidential candidate Donald Trump who tweets various misogynist insults her way after a challenging exchange during the Presidential debate. We see Kelly’s world turned upside down as her and her family’s livelihood is at stake at the hands of a ruthless paparazzi and a passionately threatening audience. Simultaneously, Carlson is fired from her position and seeks to sue Ailes for sexual harassment which is described as a money grab from those at Fox. Overall, it is a film that shows the hardship of women and how dangers in the workplace seep into their personal lives. Directed by Jay Roach and written by Charles Randolph, Bombshell allows its female protagonists to develop and grow while showing their vulnerability and resilience in their quest to end the patriarchal harassment that has humiliated women at Fox over the years.

Charlize Theron is so brilliant as Kelly. In the same vein as Monster, Theron transforms into her subject and manages to perfect every detail about them. Completely deserving of the nominations that she has received, Theron’s Kelly is poised, collected and observant. She is a woman who will not be messed around. This makes the scene in which she opens up about her experience with Ailes shocking considering her strength and influence in the workplace. During the conflict with Trump, Kelly doesn’t make any vengeful comments back and instead is aware that Fox’s access to Trump during the Presidential campaign is crucial. She is able to put her own motivations to the side. It is when she puts herself first that a wave of women from Fox come out and discuss their experience. It’s no surprise that Theron has garnered her third Oscar nomination for her portrayal as this controversial figure. She has this command when she is on the screen and a strength that makes it even more shocking when comments about her menstruating are used as an excuse for her challenging nature. She is constantly given a harder time because she is a woman and not taken as seriously as her male counterparts. Equally, Kelly has respect for Ailes and when the accusations come to light, she faces a struggle between her genuine loyalty to him and the truth. In the end, she realises that she must go with the latter but this isn’t a decision that comes easy or without consequence.

In terms of our supporting protagonists, we are given Margot Robbie and Nicole Kidman as newcomer Kayla Pospisil and fired anchor Gretchen Carlson, respectively. Robbie is beyond outstanding in support and continues a stellar year. The scene in which her character is harassed and forced to show her crotch to Ailes is extremely upsetting and difficult to watch. We see Robbie’s brilliantly layered expression as she is clearly distraught and uncomfortable herself at having to do this but she knows she must grin and bear it for risk of being fired. Kayla is a fictional character but the development of her character and the depth that she is portrayed with feels very real. The idea to accumulate multiple women into one has served Randolph’s script well as it allows various perspectives to be shown without confusing or overloading the audience with too many characters. Robbie gained an Oscar nomination for her portrayal and it is so deserved. Time and time again, Robbie is showing us her range and has managed to compile a really impressive filmography following her departure from Australian soap opera Neighbours. Kayla is a character who shows a side of Robbie that we haven’t been able to see before and makes it all the more exciting to see what roles she will take on in the future.

On the other hand, Kidman is definitely underused but packs a punch when she is onscreen. I understand that with three prominent protagonists, it can be tricky to prioritise whose story to go more in depth on but it would be wrong to underestimate Gretchen’s important in this narrative. She is the initial driving force and brings this story out to public knowledge. The opening scene shows other female anchors following the rules followed by a collection of clips of Gretchen being told that her outfits are lovely as well as comments on her body with Gretchen looking uncomfortable but laughing it off. She is immediately presented as an outsider from the get go. When confronted by a woman in the supermarket who tells her that her show and Fox News are a disgrace, Gretchen doesn’t understand and twists it back on the woman. The performance doesn’t require the same level of depth and development that Theron and Robbie have to bring because Gretchen is already at the stage of rebellion but Kidman loses herself in the role. We don’t see Kidman, we see Gretchen. It would also be wrong not to mention the eerie performance from John Lithgow as Ailes. It isn’t easy to play a role like Ailes as someone who seems kind and respected but so manipulative and abusive beneath the surface. Despite having limited screen time, Ailes has a horrifying and lingering presence over the whole film and that is thanks to Lithgow’s intimidating command that he has when he is onscreen. He is very much a puppet master.

Bombshell was a surprisingly intense and thrilling film to watch. The limited use of location, primarily the Fox studios makes for a claustrophobic experience that reflects the entrapped environment that the woman work in. The intriguing part about it is how the women start speaking out without really talking to one another for fear of being outed as a traitor. Thanks to its controversial subject matter and triple female protagonist set-up, it probably will have limited success at awards season but the fact that it has received nominations is a great achievement. Theron, in particular, really brings her A game and delivers her best performance in years.

What did you think of Bombshell? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

The Wizard of Oz (1939)

With the hype of awards season in full swing, I thought I would take a look back at some older favourites of mine. Inspired by the Judy Garland biopic, Judy, what better way to connect the current awards season with a favourite classic of mine and discuss the wonderfully magical The Wizard of Oz (1939). Commonly seen as the film that propelled Judy Garland to stardom at the tender age of 16, cementing her legacy in Hollywood for years to come. The film is adored by fans of all ages and a regular watch at Christmastime. Following Kansas teen Dorothy Gale who is whisked away in a tornado along with her dog, Toto and landing in the mysterious land of Oz. Dorothy must team up with the unlikeliest of friends and find the great Wizard to find her way home. The film was mainly directed by Victor Fleming who left the production to direct Gone With the Wind and the remaining work was taken over by King Vidor. The screenplay was written by Noel Langley, Florence Ryerson and Edgar Allan Woolf and based on the classic children’s book The Wonderful Wizard of Oz by L. Frank Baum, The Wizard of Oz is a masterclass in classic Hollywood cinema.

Judy Garland is absolutely breathtaking as Dorothy. Probably one of the most perfect casting choices in film history. From her brilliant expressions and sheer talent for being an all-rounder, it’s hard not to feel moved by Garland’s performance, particularly when she sings “Over the Rainbow”. Garland’s background and the tragedy behind her experience filming this is well-known. The trauma Garland went through during the filming was sure to have had a lasting effect on her for the rest of her life. This makes the performance even more heartbreaking watching in retrospect. Dorothy has enough bravery and courage to face her enemies and stand up for herself but there is still vulnerability there and a maturity that makes her seem older than her years while at the same time bringing in that childlike innocence.

In terms of the supporting cast, the most iconic comes in the form of Margaret Hamilton’s brilliant turn as the Wicked Witch of the West. She’s just a plain nasty character and her only motive is ensuring that Dorothy doesn’t succeed in her quest. Hamilton’s voice and characterisation is a performance of legend and has resulted in one of the most identifiable villains in film history. Whether it is one of her trademarks such as “I’ll get you, my pretty, and your little dog too” to the iconic melting scene in which we see the Wicked Witch defeated after Dorothy throws a bucket of water over her. Out of the three friends, my favourite is the Cowardly Lion (Bert Lahr), mainly because I love the costume design so much and his performance of the song “If I Were King of the Forest”. It’s a film that is rich in distinguished characters that, although simple, does a good job of giving them enough screen time to be distinguishable.

I don’t know where to begin to talk about my love for the use of colour in this film. Aside from being iconic thanks to its amazing switch from black and white to brilliant technicolour with the simple opening of a door. There is so much to look into beyond Kansas representing the normal and dreary everyday and Oz being somewhere completely different. The location and setting for Kansas is natural with realistic looking prop whereas Oz is crammed full of fake creations. Munchkinland in particular is the epitome of the Oz aesthetic. It makes for a fantastically striking entrance into the land of Oz. Maybe it’s because we’re adjusted to the black and white set up that makes the colour pop out the screen even more, the design of Oz is truly spectacular. Also, the use of colour for the characters is beautifully done. From the contrast between the ruby red slippers that Dorothy wears with the Wicked Witch’s green skin and the metallic hue of the Tin Man’s paint with the Cowardly Lion’s golden mane. Oz is a land that although entirely built from imagination, also includes a multitude of texture.

I’ve already touched on the music before but it deserves a section on its own. The film is crammed full of brilliant songs that have stood the test of time. Undoubtedly, “Over the Rainbow” is the most popular but most people would also be able to sing or hum along to the likes of “Ding-Dong! The Witch is Dead” and “If I Only Had a Brain”. It is undeniable that Garland’s voice is beautiful and flawless, striking the perfect amount of emotion in her songs. Looking through the soundtrack, it is amazing to think that so many songs have gone down in cinema history as classics. A lot of the legacy from The Wizard of Oz comes from its Academy Award winning score by Herbert Stothart. Not to forget that “Over the Rainbow” also won the Oscar for Best Original Song for Harold Arlen and Yip Harburg. It’s a whimsical soundtrack that allows its audience to escape to Oz with Dorothy.

I am sure given that I love films like Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs and The Red Shoes that I am just as fond of this one. The Wizard of Oz is an outstandingly beautiful cinematic achievement and a prime example of a film that is suitable for all ages and all cinematic tastes. It is a film that combines drama, comedy and musical while also not fearing to delving into themes of loss and friendship. Dorothy is ultimately on a journey to finding out who she is and discovering her place of belonging. It’s this relatability that makes the film so identifiable with audiences around the globe.

What do you think of The Wizard of Oz? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

The Two Popes (2019)

The first film I watched this decade is a surprising choice in the form of biopic The Two Popes following the conservative Cardinal Ratzinger (Anthony Hopkins) who becomes Pope Benedict XVI and his eventual friendship with the more liberal Cardinal Bergoglio (Jonathan Pryce), who later becomes Pope Francis. Directed by Brazilian director Fernando Meirelles with a script written by Anthony McCarten based on the latter’s novel The Pope, The Two Popes manages to successfully avoid falling into the trap of becoming another studio churned out biopic. There is no doubt that the two leads are the stars of the show and contribute a lot to the film’s overall acclaim but Meirelles control on the tone of the film and McCarten’s deeply intense script make The Two Popes a thrilling watch, particularly scenes when it is the two gentleman by themselves. The film’s strength comes in its constant shift in dynamic. The opening scenes follow the death of Pope John Paul II and the deciding vote on who will be his successor and the differences between the two eventual popes are crystal clear. Cardinal Ratzinger does everything in his power to become Pope and succeeds by persuading his fellow Cardinals during breaks from voting whereas Bergoglio is discomforted by the prospect of becoming pontiff. There seems to be a projected rivalry on the two men which Ratzinger seems to act on but Bergoglio is perplexed by this narrative.

The power from this film comes from the brilliant screenplay by McCarten. His script reads like a power struggle at times as the dynamic shifts between the two popes’ favour throughout. The inclusion of flashbacks and context into their histories also helps the film to avoid being just a simple story of one Pope’s decline and another’s ascension. There is no bias for either one as we are just presented with facts such as Ratzinger’s admission that he knew about the molestation within the Church before the scandal came to light. Despite the two men being a part of the same religion, they have completely different viewpoints. Ratzinger feels that resigning is the only way to seek absolution whereas Bergoglio thinks that he should remain Pope and see the scandal through to the end. Bergoglio’s upbringing and story is filled with a lot more turmoil than Ratzinger who seems to have had a more privileged upbringing. Their conflicting interests and differing politics result in Bergoglio coming across as more compassionate than Ratzinger because he is more accepting and open to change. The ending scene with the two men watching the football is funny to watch and makes for a light tone to suggest that their friendship is on good terms.

The two leads excel in their roles as expected. Jonathan Pryce is absolutely brilliant in the leading role as Bergoglio who is the quietly outspoken of the two. Constantly having to justify his stance on controversial topics that differ from the conservative Church teachings, Bergoglio is seen equally as a disgrace and a revolutionary within the Church. It comes to light that this has been the case all his life with his complicated background during the Argentinian militaria regime. Whereas Ratzinger revels in the tradition and opulence of the Catholic Church, Bergoglio is happy with what he has. He doesn’t understand why those high up in the Church live in such luxury. Pryce is perfect casting in both his appearance and his characterisation, truly becoming the future pope. You never know what he is going to do or say next because he is unpredictable. One minute he will be conversing in Latin with Ratzinger and the next he will be teaching him how to tango.

Anthony Hopkins’ performance is his best in film for years. Bringing out mannerisms subtly with an understated accent and acting that seems effortless but is really meticulous, Hopkins is fantastic as the newly elected Pope. Ratzinger is not necessarily a likeable character because he is so set in his ways and has many dated opinions that don’t fit in with the times. He is clearly a highly intelligent man and extremely well-read but also detached from modern society. In some ways Bergoglio tests him to embrace the present world more and try to adapt. We don’t see as much of Ratzinger’s background as Bergoglio’s but Hopkins gives us enough to know that he has always been a lonely figure. The scene in which Ratzinger gives Bergoglio his confession is fantastic. The audience lingers on Hopkins’ words as he reveals his difficult time growing up and being saved by God.

In terms of awards buzz, The Two Popes has garnered attention for Pryce and Hopkins’ performances. I don’t think either will win due to strong competition in both categories but they are deserved nominations. I didn’t think I would find this film particularly enjoyable but I was pleasantly surprised. The performances alone are enough to the grip the viewer but it proved to be even more. It’s not a film about religion but more of a character study about two very men who are connected because of that religion. There were many gripping scenes filled with tension as the two popes debate about various aspects of the church. I also wasn’t expecting the film to have so many funny moments as well and it doesn’t feel too heavy in subject matter. I think following it primarily from the point of view of Bergoglio was a smart choice as we see the events from both the inside and the outside depending on what is happening.

What did you think of The Two Popes? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Dolemite Is My Name (2019)

Dolemite Is My Name is a brilliant look into the life of African-American icon Rudy Ray Moore played by Eddie Murphy in a career best performance. Moore is a man of many talents: acting, singing and stand-up. His comedy routines are his way into fame as he channels an alter ego Dolemite, a pimp style man of the 70s who speaks in rhyme and quickly builds up a fan base within the African-American community across the US. The film specifically follows his rise to stardom and the production of his first film Dolemite, a blaxploitation feature in which he plays his comedic alter ego. Directed by Craig Brewer and written by Scott Alexander and Larry Karaszewski, Dolemite is my Name marks a welcome return to Eddie Murphy as a leading man on the big screen and also boasts a brilliant supporting cast with Craig Robinson, Tituss Burgess, Keegan-Michael Key and Snoop Dogg. It’s brash and upfront, unafraid of its subject and showing just how far one will go for their time in the spotlight. The writing is spectacular and even the scenes where Moore isn’t speaking in rhyme almost have a poetic quality to them. Every pause and interaction has a flow that works brilliantly in the film and the characters interact naturally. You completely believe and engage with the characters and at no point are drawn away from the film. The direction is quick and sharp with eye-catching colour palettes that exemplify Moore’s even more colourful personality. Everything about this film was completely wonderful to watch.

In a sea of biopics, it would be easy to miss this one which seemed to sneak onto Netflix without fanfare but that would be your loss. Moore is a man who loves the limelight and will do anything to get it. He will do whatever it takes to become famous even if it means nudity, violence or strong language. He isn’t afraid of vulgarity and thrives on the offensive nature of his content. Who better to play such a controversial figure than Eddie Murphy? Murphy allows himself to embrace all aspects of Moore’s personality from his strong bravado to his insecurities and flaws. He has left no stone unturned in his preparation and the result is a captivating and stunning performance that does the Moore legacy proud. I hope Murphy continues releasing films like this that show his talent and range as an actor. In this film alone, he has to sing, act and perform stand-up as a man who is himself portraying a character. That is tricky to pull off and yet Murphy seems to do this effortlessly. This is a film that has a big cast list and yet Murphy is the draw and the centre of attention at all times. There aren’t many moments when he isn’t onscreen and yet his presence is anticipated and felt. Of course, this is only natural since it is a biopic on his character but it really is a magnetic performance.

dolemite

As mentioned before, the supporting cast is crammed full of amazing talent. If I had to choose one that stands out from the rest, it is probably Keegan-Michael Key as screenwriter and actor Jerry Jones. Jones is an earnest playwright who makes films that explore racism in modern society. When initially approached by Moore to write the screenplay for the Dolemite movie, he is reluctant to jump onboard but is eventually taken in by the scope of Moore’s fanbase. His reactions during and after filming the sex scene for the movie is priceless. Jones is a character who is taken way out of his comfort and it initially makes him seem like the only sane person in a crazy bunch but eventually he allows himself to have fun with it. I also really enjoyed Craig Robinson’s appearance as Moore’s friend, Ben Taylor, who provides the theme song for the Dolemite movie. His role is only small but when he is onscreen, it’s wonderful to watch. The character of Taylor is great to watch as it shows his support from before Moore’s fame and ascension. The supporting characters really do support one another. It is a film that, although centred around one individual, tells the stories of multiple people. One touching story is Lady Reed (Da’Vine Joy Randolph) who is cheated on by her husband and doesn’t know what to do with her life. Alongside Moore, she stars in the film and joins him on the stage for stand-up. Although she is assisted by Moore, Lady Reed is strongly independent and isn’t afraid of sticking up for herself and her beliefs. The scene in which she thanks Moore for putting a plus size woman of colour onscreen allows Moore to realise that his project goes beyond entertaining people.

Although it has grabbed the attention of awards panels, particularly Eddie Murphy’s performance, it feels as though Dolemite Is My Name has been swept under the carpet. This could be due to Netflix’s loyalty to its other release, The Irishman, and so they have pushed that far more. In truth, I prefer Dolmite Is My Name as a film because it feels like something new and unique whereas The Irishman brings out what Scorsese does best but nothing that we haven’t seen before. I hope that if anything Murphy gets an Oscar nomination because it would be a real shame not to acknowledge the brilliant work he does on this film.

dolemite1

In a climate that has seen a rise in racism and extremist politics taking hold, Dolemite Is My Name is a film that is desperately needed. It is thoroughly entertaining and provides plenty of laughs but it equally holds no punches in its subject matter and isn’t afraid to explore the darker truths of society. It’s interesting to think that such a diverse figure such as Moore was renowned and accepted in the 70s but the struggle and work he had to put in to get there is testament to the struggles that African-Americans face on a regular basis. I hope that there are more films like this released in coming years as it is so important to present stories from all walks of life.

What did you think of Dolemite Is My Name? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

mother! (2017)

This is a film that you will either love or hate. There really isn’t an in between on this one. Darren Aronofsky’s mother! is a biblical retelling through the unconventional setting of a home as the sole location. Featuring Jennifer Lawrence and Javier Bardem as mother and Him, a married couple who live in a huge house built by the former while the latter works on his writing. mother is decorating the home and longs for a family but this is refused by Him, who is consumed by his own work to care about what mother wants. Compared to previous offerings by Aronofsky such as Black Swan, mother! is a literally and figuratively contained film. At no point do we lose sight of mother as we follow her perspective as chaos ensues. At first, the house seems open and spacious but this quickly shifts to a claustrophobic palace of mayhem as mother’s space is literally invaded by outsiders. When mother falls pregnant, she is forced to endure the increasing attention for her husband and the exposure that leaves no stone unturned in the house.

Directed and written by Aronofsky, mother! is a film that plays out like a mystery. Because we don’t see the outside world, we don’t know what or who will come next. This makes it one of the most shocking films to watch, especially when the first casualty plays out. Definitely one of the best filmmakers today, Aronofsky leaves the meaning of the film and his own intention to the imagination of the author. One can watch it from religious, feminist and even mental health angles. It’s a film that is left wide open for interpretation. There is a clear argument for the conflict between mankind and nature. The brutality and expressionist approach to the film can make it uncomfortable for viewers which is probably why it split critics and audiences alike. However, I was one of the viewers who was left in awe from the brilliance in every aspect.

Jennifer Lawrence draws out a brilliantly and fully dramatic performance that we haven’t seen since Winter’s Bone. In between the aforementioned and mother! there was an increased focus on characters with a comedic side with Lawrence starring in dark comedy-dramas as well as protagonist Katniss Everdeen in the Hunger Games franchise. It’s a performance that demands a lot on expression and physicality as mother is a character of few words. We see her initial comfort turn into catastrophe and panic as more and more people invade the house and ruin what she has built. Javier Bardem is yet again fantastic as the villainous Him. He is perfect at playing such a manipulative character whose motivations are inspired only by himself for himself. Him is careless and seemingly the reasonable one but even as he loses control, he cannot let go of the admiration of the visitors. Their love for him is more important than the love given to him by mother.

The supporting cast is led by Michelle Pfeiffer and Ed Harris as woman and man, respectively, who both pull off menacing performances as the initial outsiders who enter the house. Immediately, mother is discomforted and disturbed by their visit and Him’s insistence that they stay for as long as they like. Pfeiffer particularly is so magnetic and draws in a deeply sexual performance that equally disgusts and intrigues mother, who is puzzled by their lax attitude towards sex and openness in conversation. As mother observes, we see woman and man worship Him whilst simultaneously break house rules and venture where they shouldn’t.

There are so many scenes worth delving into but none left me speechless in the way that the shot following mother as the house descends into chaos did. Each room has a different form of punishment with herod (Kristen Wiig) shooting people in one and a SWAT team bursting through the windows and beating people up. Despite the increasing tension, the bloody violence still comes across as shocking and unexpected. Equally as heartbreaking is the scene that follows after mother gives birth. As we witness her descent into madness and the end product that the destruction has had on the house, the realisation that there is no way to repair what has happened is still heartbreaking. It’s a film that knows its pace and doesn’t desire to fit into the mainstream.

Overall, mother! is a film that allows Aronofsky to be experimental and reject the basic beginning, middle, end linear structure with a clear plot. I think it is a film that shows Aronofsky at his best. He has always been great at developing complex female characters with an expressionist approach to direction. He has a classical eye when it comes to inspiration and is inspired by music, art, ballet, film. He is brilliant at finding beauty in the ugly and drawing that out, contrasting what we are seeing with new ideas. This is evident in mother! as the mere inspiration and idea of seeing the Holy text contrast with the horrific events is something that hasn’t been done before.

What do you think of mother!? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

The Shape of Water (2017)

From the incredible mind of Guillermo del Toro comes the Best Picture winning The Shape of Water, an adult fairytale following mute Eliza (Sally Hawkins) who works as a cleaner in a government lab and falls in love with a creature (Doug Jones) who is held captive for experiments. Working with various parties including her neighbour Giles (Richard Jenkins), best friend and colleague Zelda (Octavia Spencer) and scientist Robert Hoffstetler (Michael Stulbarg) Eliza seeks to break the creature out and escape with him despite the efforts from the evil Richard Strickland (Michael Shannon), the man who captured the creature in the first place. There are a lot of moving pieces in this film but that’s not to say it’s difficult to follow. It gives the film multiple layers and changing motives and sides makes it exciting to watch. The film is definitely del Toro’s best since Pan’s Labyrinth and has become an instant classic. His direction and script are beautifully sharp and consistent with the universe he wants to create. Everything has been carefully thought through from the Baltimore setting to the oceanic colour palette. It’s no coincidence that we first see Eliza in a room of deep green hues and Richard covered in bright red blood. It’s a striking visual representation of which characters are good and evil.

The characters are fantastically developed, particularly Eliza. Hawkins brings a career best as the movie loving dreamer who longs to find love. Eliza leads a simple life which we gain a glimpse of as we view her morning routine which consists of boiling eggs, running a bath and masturbating. The genius of this character is that Hawkins physicality allows Eliza to be expressive and can communicate her emotion with a simple glance. Eliza is fearless when encountering the creature. She is unfazed by the blood and threatening build of the creature and instead encourages it to get close to her so she can teach it sign language and music. One of the most intense scenes comes when she is asked where the creature is and she signs “FUCK YOU” to Strickland. The latter is naturally confused as her signing as he does not understand and it creates a truly terrifying moment as Eliza takes control of the situation. Eliza knows when to take advantage of her condition and is deeply observant of those around her. Her main development comes in the form of rejecting everyone else’s wishes and learning to do what she wants. She subverts the traditional idea of love and finds her identifying more with the creature than humans because they can communicate and understand each other in ways that Eliza can’t with other humans.

The supporting cast also perform a stellar job and there isn’t a particular highlight because everyone does a fantastic job. The support cast is male-dominated due to Eliza’s job working in a government facility in 1920s Baltimore. Working in the facility are Strickland and Hoffstetler on opposing sides of the creature’s treatment. Shannon is truly evil in his role bringing the scariest performance of his career. His presence onscreen immediately brings silence as there is an unpredictability to his character. He is strict on control and when Hoffstetler threatens the slightest bit of control, this bothers him. Stulbarg’s performance is one of tenderness and concern. He winces at the sight of violence and blood which is unusual for a man with his profession. Stulbarg’s performance is layered with multiple characters and motivations. His stance and reasoning is even more unpredictable than Strickland’s. On the other hand there are Zelda and Giles who reluctantly go with Eliza’s plans. Earning Oscar nominations for their Supporting performances, Spencer and Jenkins provide Eliza’s voice at times when she needs it. Each actor is cast perfectly as they embody their roles perfectly. Zelda and Giles are also members of minorities themselves with Zelda being black and Giles being openly homosexual. Together, the trio help to support each other in a society that is dominated by the straight white men.

Music is such a crucial part of this film as it gives Eliza a voice when she doesn’t have assistance. In scenes where she communicates with the creature, she uses a record player to convey her emotions towards him. The soundtrack is a mix of classical original score and songs from the 1920s that were used in television specials and films. Not only does it give the film it’s chronological context but it also allows del Toro to delve into his own love of Old Hollywood and push this personal perspective to the front. In terms of the score, we are treated to a fantastic selection of pieces composed by Alexandre Desplat. Just like the film, the score is a mix of genres taking mainly from fantasy by adding in the whimsy of musical and light and dark tones to reflect comedy and drama. It’s a truly captivating soundtrack and well worth the second Oscar that Desplat received.

As I have mentioned before, the cinematography is fantastic. The film is quintessentially del Toro with his distinctive use of colour and impeccable ability to build his own universes. The audience is immediately immersed from the first shot when we see Eliza’s apartment underwater as Giles narrates in a fairytale manner. What works so well is that del Toro easily merges the fantasy with the real by making his world as realistic as possible but adding whimsical qualities. There are some gory scenes in the film and as expected, del Toro doesn’t shy away from showing the audience this but it’s because of the film’s primary genre being fantasy, it doesn’t feel overwrought or overwhelming to those who don’t like horror films. The film feels suitable for any genre because the topics are so universal and the vision so distinctive.

There are few films that impact me so much immediately but after I viewed The Shape of Water, I completely fell in love with everything about it. It was wonderful seeing del Toro deliver a film that feels so personal and poignant. The film feels like del Toro’s love letter for films and the many influences such as The Creature from the Black Lagoon are really felt here.

What do you think about The Shape of Water? Let me know in the comments below!