Categories
Uncategorised

Soul (2020)

One of the most hyped film of 2020, especially after it was delayed a couple of times after the pandemic took hold. Pixar’s Soul has been the subject of much conversation when Disney announced that it would be uploaded onto Disney+ on Christmas Day. I had actively avoided watching any trailers but knew that it involved jazz somehow. Watching the film provided to be both captivating and enlightening, providing one of the most emotional scenes I have ever seen in a Pixar film (yes, you read that correctly!).

Soul is directed by Pete Docter who is responsible for some of the best Pixar films including my favourite of all time, Up. What Docter does so well is include more mature themes that children may not understand initially but can grow to appreciate whilst maintaining that feeling of hopefulness and light. The film follows aspiring jazz musician, Joe (voiced by Jamie Foxx) who is struggling to find purpose as he works as a middle school teacher to make ends meet. Juggling the pressure from the school and his mother, Joe finally is given an opportunity to play with professional musician, Dorothea (voiced by Angela Bassett) but an unfortunate incident leads to his untimely death. What follows is an abstract and bizarre journey that explores what happens after life. When he finds himself mentoring an unborn soul called 22 (Tina Fey) to help find their spark and purpose to live, Joe begins to understand that there may be more to life than just jazz.

The film has garnered a lot of controversy among parents who feel as though the subject of life and death is too macabre to explain to children but death is a part of life and if your child is too young to understand then they are not likely to be affected by that aspect of the plot. Pixar’s earlier films Coco and Onward are among the many films that have incorporated life and death into their narrative yet generated no controversy for doing so. Soul has more to offer than simply suggesting what may lay ahead and there is enough music and liveliness to keep the overall tone lifted. Films can often be seen as a form of escapism but there is no harm in including some challenging questions and ideas into the storyline.

As expected, the cast is glittered with stars, bursting at the seams with huge A list names. I have previously mentioned some of them above and everyone does a fantastic job. I would, however, like to draw attention to the casting of Richard Ayoade and Rachel House as some of the monitors based in the “Great Before”, the place one enters before venturing to the “Great Beyond”. Ayoade and House mainly provide comic relief and their distinctive voices are always a nice inclusion in any film.

In terms of the score, it’s quite clear that Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross are having a stellar year after their recent collaboration for David Fincher’s Mank. The score for Soul is unlike any sound they have experimented with before. Combining jazz inspired music with dramatic ballads to show the clash between worlds from Joe’s perspective, the score is more subdued than what I thought it would be, particularly considering that jazz and music in general plays an integral role in the film. However, it feels as though that decision was made to show that music doesn’t necessarily have to be everything in Joe’s life. The tender moments we see him (or 22 as him) share with the people around him get him to realise this.

Soul really was worth the wait and more, particularly a scene near the end in which Joe journies as far as he can with 22 to Earth made for one of the huge emotional moments in Pixar history. The animation feels like it has been turned up a notch in terms of how much detail and scope the artists go. The scenes in which Joe ventures through the Great Before are the reason why audiences became captivated with Pixar in the first place. That unhindered imagination where nothing is impossible is hard to ignore and easy to appreciate. I do feel as though the ending could have done with an extra scene just to tie everything up neatly but that is proper nitpicking. Missing out on Soul is missing out on one of the best cinematic experiences of the year. It is just such a shame that it wasn’t to be appreciated on the big screen.

What did you think of Soul? Let me know in the comments below!

Soul is now showing on Disney+ so watch it as soon as you can!

Categories
Uncategorised

2021 Awards Season

It goes without saying that the pandemic has certainly flipped every sector of life upside down. In terms of films, we have seen the industry reach a point where the fate of cinemas will now be in the hands of 2021. In the meantime, we have seen the majority of award frontrunners released on streaming websites, particularly Netflix who have a huge chunk of award worthy films this time around. The topic of streaming service films being up for major awards has been subject of much debate. I personally think that a film that can transfer the emotion and grandeur from the big screen to small screen and still keep its impact is a hugely difficult challenge and commend filmmakers who are able to do so.

Bearing this in mind, in the 13 years I have actively followed awards season, watching films for this awards season is turning out to be a unique experience. I love the fact that I can revisit the films for multiple views whenever I want. That being said, I cannot wait for cinemas to reopen and experience the full magic of the movies again.

I’ll be discussing my award season predictions in a week or so when I have watched a few more but for now, I’ll be leaving the links to the reviews I have written thus far and add to them as my film list grows.

Here is the list:

Ammonite

Another Round

Borat Subsequent Moviefilm

Crip Camp

Da 5 Bloods

The Dig

Eurovision Song Contest: The Story of Fire Saga

The Father

The Forty-Year-Old Version

Hillbilly Elegy

The Human Voice – short film

I Care a Lot

I’m Thinking of Ending Things

Judas and the Black Messiah

The Life Ahead

Lovers Rock

Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom

Malcolm and Marie

Mangrove

Mank

The Midnight Sky

Minari

Nomadland

On the Rocks

One Night in Miami

Palm Springs

Pieces of a Woman

The Prom

Promising Young Woman

Saint Maud

Soul

Sound of Metal

The Trial of the Chicago 7

The United States vs. Billie Holiday

The White Tiger

Wolfwalkers

There are so many more films for me to see and I am very excited. I’ll be posting links to those reviews in this article as well so you can follow any updates here.

Which film has been your favourite so far? Any potential Oscar winners on your list? Let me know in the comments below!

Most importantly, stay safe and happy holidays!

Categories
Uncategorised

Mank (2020)

There are few films that have generated such concersation this year than David Fincher’s new film, Mank. Following Hollywood screenwriter, Herman J. Mankiewicz (Gary Oldman) and the inception and creation of Orson Welles’ masterpiece, Citizen Kane, Mank is not your regular run-off-the-mill Hollywood film that glorifies filmmaking. Fincher looks into the dark side of film production and the manipulation that happens behind the scenes. Admittedly, I wasn’t sure what to expect going in beyond it having an amazing cast and crew and the backlash it appears to be receiving on social media but I personally loved it. Not only in its black and white appearance but the tone and direction reflects Citizen Kane which at points blends fact and fiction as Mank begins to succumb to the alcoholism that haunts him.

David Fincher’s direction is fantastic as ever and I truly think this may be the film that puts an Oscar in his hands. Based on a screenplay written by his late father, Jack Fincher, Mank is an intricate character study into the mind of a brilliant man who is challenged by the rules and regulations of the Hollywood Studios. In many ways, Mank feels as though you are watching a film from the Golden Age at points but from a behind-the-scenes vantage point. What is fantastic about how Fincher directs is the shift in tone. There are many points that feel like a thriller or even horror as Mank descends in madness while writing the project. The whole span of the film is sixty days and yet the amount of action feels as though it spans years. The passion Fincher has, arguably in part due to adapting his late father’s script, is evident and I think he does a flawless job at conveying the darkness that lies beneath the glamour. What is brilliant about Fincher’s films is that each one is completely different from the other. He truly is one of the most exciting filmmakers working today, even if his filmography isn’t the most extensive.

Gary Oldman’s performance has played a major part of the discussion in the conversations regarding the film. Playing a man 20 years his junior does seem a little miscast but look beyond this and there lies an amazing performance. Mank is such a layered man who loves his craft and his lifestyle yet isn’t afraid to bite the hand that feeds him. He treasures his friendships but risks it all in the name of his sharp wit and even harsher writing. Oldman is undoubtedly one of the best living actors and although Mank isn’t the best performance of his whole career, it’s still a fantastic turn.

The support in this film comes from Amanda Seyfried who, in my opinion, is the highlight of the film for me. Playing 1930s Hollywood icon, Marion Davies was no easy feat. During the Golden Age of Hollywood, Davies was well-known and admired and unfortunately her affair with William Randolph Hearst (Charles Dance) is what history associates her with. Seyfried will no doubt be nominated for a Best Supporting Actress and I really hope she wins. She’s given flawless performances, particularly in comedies in her early career such as Mean Girls (2004) and Jennifer’s Body (2009). Mank is a welcome dramatic stretch for her while still maintaining the intelligent wit Davies possessed. From her first scene, Seyfried is magnetic in the same nostalgic way the leading ladies were commanded to be.

There are many scenes in Mank that have stayed with me but the one that is the true standout is when Mank begins to discuss his plans for his upcoming film at a dinner that is attended by Marion Davies, Louis B. Mayer (Arliss Howard) and William Randolph Hearst no less. Oldman’s phenomenal acting in this scene is horrendously intense and extremely uncomfortable as he insults and berates the guests at the dinner before setting his attention on Hearst and discrediting his name and political career. Watching Mank make his way slowly around the table as the guests start to leave one by one until only Mank, Mayer and Hearst are the only ones left.

Overall, Mank is a fantastic insight into the overlooked mind behind what is often considered the greatest film ever made. The similarities in filming style of Citizen Kane and Mank are evident that go beyond the black and white stylistic choice. Citizen Kane may be about Hearst but really the creation of the film is primarily about Mank himself and his outlook on the world. Watching Citizen Kane with this new outlook will definitely make it a different experience. I have also been thinking of writing a David Fincher ranking list and it’ll be interesting to see where Mank would fall.

What did you think of Mank? Let me know in the comments below!

Mank is available to stream now on Netflix.