Tag: picture

Categories
Uncategorised

Top 5 Joaquin Phoenix Performances

Undoubtedly the man of the moment in the film that has the festival circuit buzzing, Joaquin Phoenix is the frontrunner for awards for his titular performance in Todd Phillips’ origin story Joker. During a film climate that seems dominated by superhero films, Joker seems like it is doing something entirely different by twisting the tone and idea of the superhero movie. It feels that after years of playing the underdog in Indie features and his reluctance to entertain the spotlight, the mainstream media has finally caught up. It feels only right that I compile a list of my top 5 performances although it’s very tricky to do so.

Here’s my top 5 in chronological order:

Gladiator (2000)

I never thought Gladiator would be in a top anything list. Truth be told, I find the film overwhelming overall but the one element of it I absolutely love is Joaquin Phoenix’s brilliant performance as the evil Commodus, the power hungry son of Marcus Aurelius who gives power to Maximus (Russell Crowe) until a new empire is formed. His lust for power knows no bounds as he murders his own father and has Maximus arrested. It’s Phoenix’s performance that brings the real depth to this film. He could have easily played this role as a cartoonish villain but instead brings a snakelike presence to the character. His strength comes from the power that others give him rather than strength that he has by himself which comes to fruition in the final fight scene with Maximus.

The Master (2012)

Undoubtedly my favourite Joaquin Phoenix performance, The Master follows ex-marine Freddie Quell (Joaquin Phoenix) as he becomes involved with a cult called The Cause, led by Lancaster Dodd (Philip Seymour Hoffman) and his wife, Peggy (Amy Adams). I won’t dwell too much on this film, mainly because I have written an extensive review for this film (which you can read here). Phoenix brings his A game to his performance and it truly is a career best. The scene where he initially undergoes “Processing” with Lancaster in which his darkest secrets and even darker past are revealed. It’s a brilliantly shot scene that brings together to titans of acting and should have won both Phoenix and Hoffman Academy Awards.

Her (2013)

Spike Jonze’s romantic Her shows a tender side to Phoenix in the role of Theodore Twombly, a depressed soon-to-be divorcé whose job is writing intimate letters for people who are too afraid to do so. He is so emotionally intense and yet detached at the same time as he begins a sexual relationship with his OS (voiced by Scarlett Johansson). Featuring a stellar cast that is rounded off by Amy Adams and Rooney Mara, this was one of the best films of 2013 and brought Spike Jonze a much-deserved Oscar for his screenplay. It’s a saddening portrayal of love and heartbreak in the 21st century. This is a film that easily could have fallen into ridiculous due to its eccentric plot but the sincerity that Phoenix brings to the role allows the audience to become truly invested in the plot.

Inherent Vice (2014)

Phoenix’s second collaboration with Paul Thomas Anderson brings renowned author Thomas Pynchon to the big screen in what is the only adaptation to date. Based on the drug-infused novel, Inherent Vice, we follow Doc Sportello, an alcoholic, drug-loving cop in 1969 as he tries to bring down a drug lord. It’s a hallucinogenic mesh of colour, music and Joanna Newsom who stars as a narrator only Doc can see. The film itself is hugely underrated, possibly due to the fact that it is too bizarre for a lot of people. Being a big fan of Pynchon, I was so excited to see how it would work adapting one of his books into film and it works perfectly. Phoenix is perfect casting and carries off Doc’s happy-go-lucky attitude with ease. He heads up a star-studded cast fantastically and commands the screen whenever he is on it. He brings the perfect amount of slapstick while also keeping the character’s dignity intact. It’s truly a brilliant film that I think is wrongly overlooked.

You Were Never Really Here (2017)

Lynne Ramsay’s gritty New York City based nightmare follows Phoenix as hitman, Joe, who lives and breathes violence and killing all while living with his elderly mother in his childhood home. He specialises in rescuing trafficked girls. He’s a character who’s backstory is stained with violence and abuse and there isn’t much else that he is capable of doing. He is quiet and alone but happy in his loneliness. When tasked with retrieving a Senator’s daughter from traffickers, Joe embarks on his hardest mission yet. The film is bloody and holds no punches. It’s brutal from beginning to end with devastating results. The direction and writing is super tight and brought both Phoenix and Ramsay prizes at Cannes Film Festival in a rare double win.

With the release of Joker, it seems that Phoenix is going to break into the mainstream and he’s the frontrunner come award season. It seems that these awards are long overdue. If it were up to me, he’d have a couple of oscars in his cabinet already but sadly that hasn’t been the case. I’d hope that those who are introduced to phoenix’s talents as the Joker watch him in other films and see his talents beyond that superhero universe.

I’ll be posting a review for Joker as soon as its released and I’m looking forward to seeing whether it would break into my top 5.

What do you think of my list? Do you agree or disagree? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Inferno (1980)

Dario Argento’s second feature in his Three Mother’s trilogy transport us from the Freiburg set Suspiria (1977) to New York where a young writer, Rose (Irene Miracle), is suspicious of a curse within her building. After reading an antique book titled The Three Mothers, she finds that the apartment block she lives at was once occupied by one of the Mothers. The Three Mothers rule the world with sorrow (Mater Suspiriorum who lives in Freiburg), tears (Mater Lachrymarum who lives in Rome) and darkness (Mater Tenebrarum who resides in New York). With Mater Suspiriorum meeting her demise in Suspiria, we now see Mater Tenebrarum face off those who rebel against her rule in New York. Tenebrarum is the cruelest of the sisters and the deaths in this film definitely reflect that.

Directed and written by Argento, Inferno carries on the themes explored in Suspiria but on a seemingly bigger scale. The stronger scenes are those based in the Mother’s domains as their presence can be felt at every corner. Argento’s love for the dramatic is also carried on in this film with lingering suspense and exaggerated deaths. Upon a traumatic discovery in the cellar of her apartment block, Rose writes to her brother, Mark (Leigh McCloskey), who is studying music in Rome and begs him to come and help her solve the mystery. From the moment Rose posts the letter, deaths begin to happen to whomever the siblings come across with Mark dealing with Mater Lachryrum during his time in Rome. Like Susie Banyon (Jessica Harper) in Suspiria, Rose is a strong and independent female character which is refreshing to see in classic horror films. Romani Albani is brought on as cinematographer and does a brilliant job of bringing Argento’s vision to life by bringing contrasts throughout the film from the surreal apartment that Rose’s sickly neighbour, Elise (Daria Nicolodi) lives in to the gritty sewers of Central Park. It feels like visual growth from Suspiria.

The film is filled with suspense from start to finish with a breathtaking scene in the cellar as Rose tries to search for the clues to lead her to the mysterious owner of the building. When her necklace falls into a deep pool, she is forced to dive and founds an underwater ballroom in a scene that sets the tone for the rest of the film. Argento never allows the audience to feel settled and the only scenes that don’t contain scares or violence tend to be those where background story is given in Argento’s signature fairytale way. Even the introduction begins with Rose reading an excerpt from The Three Mothers aloud in a way that makes it seem like an adult fairytale. Much like Suspiria, the experience of Inferno is heightened by the amazing soundtrack with a score composed by Keith Emerson who does a brilliant job. He combines new electronic sounds with dramatic operatic pieces to add to the unbalanced ambience that the film creates. It’s a striking score that I think is overlooked due to the iconic association that Argento has with The Goblins who composed the stellar music for Suspiria. What Emerson does is create an entirely different film with his unique sound.

My favourite scene comes near the beginning of the film when we are first introduced to Mark who is attending a classical music session. As he tries to read Rose’s letter, he is distracted by Mater Lachrymarum who is disguised as a beautiful student (Ania Pieroni). He can see that she is mouthing something at him and he feels pain. It is an intense scene as the wind picks up and he is visibly uncomfortable. When he snaps out the pain, she has mysteriously disappeared and he accidentally leaves the letter behind. It’s a brilliant scene that uses the classical music as the main force of emotion as the gradual crescendo coincides with his building pain.

Although the film overall isn’t as tight as Suspiria, I think it is highly underrated. I think that Suspiria is a stronger film because it focuses on the first witch but Inferno brings in the remaining witches with the first act showing killings in Rome before travelling to New York. I think the short running time of 90 minutes means that we don’t spend much time in either place. On release, this film was critically panned but over the years has developed much love in retrospect. In some ways I find this film more interesting than Suspiria because it brings in the legend of The Three Mothers. Much like Suspiria, the aesthetic of the film is beautiful as well with Argento’s signature use of bright contrasting colours to set the mood of the scene and plenty of gore and blood throughout. There is clearly a lot of passion that was put in this film and it’s a shame that the film did badly on initial release. It’s a horror film that I think will only get better with time.

What do you think of Inferno? Did you like it or loathe it? Let me know in the comments below!

You can my review on Suspiria here!

Categories
Uncategorised

Midsommar (2019)

As Summer is coming to an end, I thought it would be apt to write a post on my favourite film of the season. Unsurprisingly enough, it comes in the form of a summertime nightmare with Ari Aster’s second feature Midsommar. Following on from his brilliant debut, Hereditary (2018), Aster has managed to surpass expectations and once again brings us a new and refreshing take on traditional horror. The film follows college student, Dani (Florence Pugh) who joins her boyfriend, Christian (Jack Reynor) and his friends: Mark (Will Poulter), Josh (William Jackson Harper) and Pelle (Vilhelm Blomgren) on a trip to Sweden to observe a rare festival among Pelle’s familial commune. Things quickly turn sour as members of the group begin to disappear without a trace. It’s easy enough to expect a film in the same vein as The Wicker Man when introduced to the pagan style life the commune leads in the Swedish woods.

Florence Pugh’s leading turn only helps to further push her presence as an actress to watch. Dani is one of the most complex female characters to arise from modern cinema. We see her shift from the Westernised world that she lives in where there is no hope for her to the cult where she begins to feel belonging. It’s a haunting portrayal of depression and anxiety and is shown in an explicit way that hasn’t been explored before. The events in the film happen due to other’s people actions but they are always directly in relation to Dani and her welfare. Pugh’s acting chops are really highlighted in the dance scene where she becomes so absorbed in the competition that she finds herself speaking Swedish fluently with her competitors. The scene is transformative for Dani as she allows herself to be open to the ceremony and the community.

Photo_03

The supporting cast also knock it out the park with their performances. Will Poulter in particular gives a career best as the ignorant Mark, who literally and figuratively pisses all over the commune’s celebrations. Whereas Dani’s demons are hidden below the surface, the male characters’ flaws are on show for all to see. Whereas Dani is ridiculed for her struggles in US, the tables are turned for the men in the commune as women dominate the landscape. The film’s goriest scenes are mainly at the cost of the ignorant visitors and yet it doesn’t feel like a slasher film. The audience, like the characters, are outsiders but they are invading the ceremony and evoke little sympathy from the audience because of their ignorance and greed. Jack Reynor also excels as Dani’s emotionally distant boyfriend, Chris. He has allowed himself to become so detached to Dani that he acts emotionless and unsympathetic when tragedy strikes at the beginning of the film. He is unwilling to see how wrong he treats her as she struggles to fight for his love and repair things. During the film, we see Christian’s confidence shaken as he becomes targeted by the cult.

As expected, Aster’s script and direction showcase his talent as an original voice in film and his fearless approach to filmmaking. He isn’t afraid to explore taboo subjects or make the audience uncomfortable. One such scene is during an ättestupa ceremony where two elderly people jump from a high cliff. Aster doesn’t allow the camera to turn away as we see the bodies hit the ground. The reactions that Dani and co feel become all the more real because Aster forces the audience to experience it as well. It’s a film that demands the attention in details from its audience. Every aspect of the costumes and set have been well thought out and serve a purpose that pay off later in the film. The use of striking visual sets make it a memorable film and the immaculate beauty of the cult’s village make the strict lifestyle all the more terrifying. I think this film shows a growth in directorial vision from Aster’s standpoint as he really allows the audience to get into Dani’s psyche. The true brilliance of this film is Aster’s ability to contrast Dani’s claustrophobic feelings to the open space that the commune live in so effectively.

midsommar-cult-happyfaces-700x308

Another aspect I loved about the film was the use of costumes. Not only the ethereal and fresh qualities the commune colours have which seem refreshing when we first see the village. The standout costume, however, comes in a brilliant floral creation worn by Dani in the films final scenes. In any other film, it would seem ridiculous but it makes sense in this film. It both stands out and blends in at the same time and plays a big role in the terrifying climatic scene.

If it were up to me, this film would be a safe contender for various mainstream awards but I am aware that it is too violent and “out there” for some. It is not a film for the faint of heart or easily offended. Between the subtle cannibalism, male frontal nudity and graphic sex scenes, this isn’t a comfortable film to watch but that is what makes it such a brilliant piece of cinema.

What did you think of the film? Did you like it as much? What was your film of the summer? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Disney Animated Classics: Numbers 41-45 Ranking

Sorry for the long break! I’ve been so busy that I haven’t found the time to write up my articles. However, I’m back and ready to carry on with my rankings. I’m sure you’re all dying to see the end result!

Riding on the success of the Disney Renaissance, the studio finds itself in a period of cockiness and nostalgia and proves that the overwhelming success of the 90s didn’t just come on a whim. The head honchos believe that now is a good time to release direct-to-video sequels and prequels galore to accompany the re-releases of the classics that are released from the Disney Vault. This is also a time when lots of projects that were overlooked during the Renaissance find their way onto the big screen.

As ever you can read the previous instalments here:

Films 1-5

Films 6-10

Films 11-15

Films 16-20

Films 21-25

Films 26-30

Films 31-35

Films 36-40

The majority of these films were not kindly looked upon critically or commercially compared to the predecessors of the previous decade. I do have a soft spot for this bunch as I went to see all of them in the cinema (with the exception of Home on the Range) and I have fond memories of watching them all on a loop. However, I do admit that they don’t have the lasting legacy that other Disney offerings have and despite being under 20 years old, they are often overlooked.

Without further ado, let’s crack on with the reviews for films 41-45:

41) Atlantis: The Lost Empire (2001)

Disney spared no expense on the production and marketing for this film (between $90-120 million was spent) and it was everywhere you looked. Atlantis was expected to be the next great Disney epic and the media and audience lapped the hype up only to be disappointed by the end result. Following Atlantis enthusiast Milo Thatch (voiced by Michael J. Fox) who embarks on a mission to find the lost kingdom, Atlantis is visually stunning and boasts some of Disney’s finest animation. What this film brings in style, it lacks in substance with a script that doesn’t feel finished. We’re presented with an array of one-dimensional characters but the real star of the show is Atlantis’ Princess Kida who is fascinated by the outsiders and wants to form a relationship with the outside world. It’s a shame that Disney hasn’t followed on her legacy in the past few years as she is overlooked in the Disney Princess canon constantly. This is a film that I thoroughly enjoy watching as there are numerous scenes that I hugely appreciate such as the Leviathan attack on the submarine, the scene where Kida is taken over by the protective crystal and the climatic battle in the volcano where Milo faces off the corrupt soldiers. It’s a film that (like 1985’s The Black Cauldron) deserved better writing and fleshed out characters but ultimately falls flat and has become forgotten with time.

42) Lilo & Stitch (2002)

One of the most loved modern Disney films about a young Hawaiian girl who befriends an alien on the run from his creator, Lilo & Stitch is a heartwarming film about differences and the struggle to fit in. Lilo is a quirky little girl whose hobbies include taking pictures of sunburnt tourists and playing Elvis Presley songs full blast. She is badly bullied by those in her dance class and unknowingly acts out, causing problems for her older sister, Nani who is also her guardian. When social services start to look into taking Lilo away, Nani thinks it’d be good for Lilo to get a pet dog to keep her preoccupied. Enter Experiment 626, the runaway alien who finds himself in the dog kennel. Lilo is immediately taken by his physical differences and ability to speak that she immediately adopts him, names him Stitch and shows him around the island. There’s a reason that this film has become among the most iconic and recognisable of modern Disney. Its message about the importance of family is one that immediately resonates with the audience. The scene in which Nani sings “Aloha Oe” to Lilo as she comes to terms with the prospect that Lilo will be taken away is one of the most heartbreaking and, because of this, daring scenes that Disney have put to screen. This aspect of loss makes the payoff even better when Stitch recites Lilo’s motto that “ohana means family” to Nani. The film is one that has touched hearts around the globe and Stitch is among the most iconic Disney characters of the modern era.

43) Treasure Planet (2002)

A project that had been pushed back for ten years, Treasure Planet finally saw its release in 2002. Featuring an all-star cast that includes Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Emma Thompson and an extortionate budget ($140 million!), this futuristic retelling of Robert Louis Stevenson’s Treasure Island about a young man who comes in possession of a highly-sought treasure map and sets off with a group of pirates to seek it has been subject to countless adaptations throughout the year. Never has this story been told in space where aliens take up most of the characters and the audience is taken across the galaxy in search of an entire planet that is filled with treasure. Utilising computer animation more so than previous films, Treasure Planet attempts to hurl Disney into a new era. Sadly, like Atlantis before it, the result is hugely underwhelming and we’re left with another forgettable entry in the Disney catalogue. I think the script is strong, following the premise of its source material but the style feels inconsistent to me. Visually, it is quite overwhelming as there is a lot going on. It’s a world inhabited by humans, aliens, traditional structures and futuristic architecture. It feels like a mesh of the past and the future which comes across disjointed as there isn’t a middle-ground. 

44) Brother Bear (2003)

Made on a more modest budget of $46 million, Brother Bear follows Kenai, a young tribesman who is transformed into a bear after recklessly hunting down and killing a bear in the mountains of the spirits. Joined by young cub, Koda, Kenai must find his way back to the mountain in order to be turned back. The film is definitely a middling effort and feels rushed in execution. My favourite aspect of the film is the great soundtrack that includes songs by Phil Collins and the mesmerising track “Transformation” sang by the Bulgarian Women’s Choir. The scene in which Kenai is transformed is beautifully done and it’s a shame that the rest of the film doesn’t follow that standard. It’s an enjoyable watch but doesn’t hold its own against the greater works by Disney. It’s a shame that it wastes such a talented cast that includes Joaquin Phoenix as Kenai and Rick Moranis making a rare return to voice work as one half of a randomly included moose duo. It feels that the tone is imbalanced throughout as there is a serious undertone that is constantly overthrown by characters such as the moose. Their humour doesn’t fit in well and it makes the overall experience jarring.

45) Home on the Range (2004)

By far one of the worst films ever to come out of the Disney studio, Home on the Range follows a group of cows who attempt to capture a cattle rustler called Alameda Slim. I enjoyed this film on release but sadly I don’t enjoy it at all watching it now. It’s forgetful and doesn’t have the same amount of Disney charm as the other instalments. The plot is weak and generic and the characters are bland. Featuring voice work by Judi Dench, Jennifer Tilly and Randy Quaid among others, Home on the Range falls into the trap of style over substance and suffers tremendously for it. Continuing the trend for middling efforts and released among a fleet of direct-to-video sequels and prequels, Home on the Range doesn’t stand out for its mundane effort. Sadly, there is a reason why Home on the Range is always forgotten and eschewed in Disney marketing and merchandise. There isn’t anything in the film that is marketable or memorable for the audience.

It’s mad to think that there are only two more posts left in this series until we’re up to date. The next post sees Disney delve into computer animation with Chicken Little (2005) and Meet the Robinsons (2007) and enter a new era of Disney masterpieces with The Princess and the Frog (2009) and Tangled (2010)

Here is my ranking:

1) Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937)

2) Fantasia (1940)

3) Beauty and the Beast (1991)

4) Sleeping Beauty (1959)

5) Bambi (1942)

6) The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh (1977)

7) The Lion King (1994)

8) Mulan (1998)

9) The Little Mermaid (1989)

10) Alice in Wonderland (1951)

11) Aladdin (1992)

12) The Aristocats (1971)

13) One Hundred and One Dalmatians (1961)

14) The Emperor’s New Groove (2000)

15) The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1996)

16) Lilo & Stitch (2002)

17) Peter Pan (1953)

18) The Three Caballeros (1945)

19) Pinocchio (1940)

20) Pocahontas (1995)

21) Tarzan (1999)

22) Dumbo (1941)

23) Hercules (1997)

24) The Black Cauldron (1985)

25) Atlantis: the Lost Empire (2001)

26) The Great Mouse Detective (1986)

27) Treasure Planet (2002)

28) Brother Bear (2003)

29) The Jungle Book (1967)

30) The Sword in the Stone (1963)

31) Cinderella (1950)

32) The Rescuers (1977)

33) Robin Hood (1973)

34) Oliver & Company (1988)

35) Lady and the Tramp (1955)

36) The Fox and the Hound (1981)

37) Fun and Fancy Free (1947)

38) The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr. Toad (1949)

39) Saludos Amigos (1943)

40) Melody Time (1948)

41) Fantasia 2000 (2000)

42) The Rescuers Down Under (1990)

43) Make Mine Music (1946)

44) Home on the Range (2004)

45) Dinosaur (2000)

 

What do you think of the list? Do you think I’ve been too harsh on these entries? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Toy Story 4 (2019)

I won’t give away too much of the specific plot away in my review but the basic storyline is new owner Bonnie creates a toy out of trash, Forky, who becomes her favourite toy but he longs to be back with the trash. When the family take a road trip, Forky jumps out the window to become trash meaning Woody has to go collect him and bring him back to Bonnie. The film is then set in a quaint little town that has a travelling carnival visiting and Pixar makes use of this inclusion with aplomb. Pixar studio always said that they would only go ahead with Toy Story 4 if the story was necessary. When they announced that the film was in production (and despite the high quality of each Toy Story film), I couldn’t help doubting whether a fourth installment really was necessary since the third one rounded the franchise off nicely. I am glad to say that there was no need to be in doubt at all. I think that the UK marketing team for Pixar did a brilliant job of not actually giving away too much of the plot which made the film all the more enjoyable to watch and also surprising.

It goes without saying that Tom Hanks and Tim Allen do a fantastic job in their iconic roles as Woody and Buzz, respectively but there are also a great array of new characters that are brought into the fold. My favourite character is the aforementioned Forky. Everything about this little guy is hilarious from how he looks to his physicality to the way he talks and socialises with other toys. He is a fantastic little addition to the Toy Story family and honestly it’s been hilarious seeing how many toys Disney have made of him for extortinate prices despite the fact that his character was literally made from items from a bin. Other characters introduced in this film include Bunny and Ducky, voiced by comedy duo Jordan Peele and Keegan-Michael Key who are also great additions. They are adorable plush teddies who have been waiting three years to be won at the carnival fair. The last toy inclusion to mention is Duke Kaboom, a Canadian action figure voiced by Keanu Reeves. He is a hilarious and sensitive character who speaks passionately about his past owner, Rijon, who got rid of him. We also see the reintroduction of an old toy in this film. Bringing back Bo Peep who has been given a makeover into a strong heroine is a long cry away from her shy, lovestruck self in the first two Toy Story films and has been the cause of complaint to some but rest assured it is done fantastically and subtly to the point where it makes sense with her own storyline. It’s also great for Pixar to show the contextual progression where female characters don’t have to be passive love interests. Bo Peep does a lot of the rescuing in this film and it’s treated no differently to when male characters take action.

It’s easy to imagine that with the addition of so many characters that they don’t have their chance for character growth but the writers have done a great job with balancing this out. Forky and Bo Peep are given the most space for character growth since their stories are central to the plot whereas Ducky, Bunny and Duke are used as comic relief so only their backstories are given. Knowing the importance of the toys in the specific film means that the audience isn’t crammed with too many plotlines that they can’t keep up with. With their being so many new and different characters, it does mean that all of Bonnie’s toys (with the exception of Woody, Buzz and arguably Jessie) may as well have not been brought on the road trip. When Bonnie loses Forky, she doesn’t care that she has numerous other (non-trash made) toys in the RV. They’re just there in the background for the whole film. They didn’t even need to bring in a replacement for Mr. Potatohead as they recycled old lines said by Don Rickles in previous films. This isn’t a bad thing necessarily but it does mean that their importance has been faded out in this (supposedly) final installment. There were many scenes that I enjoyed in this film but if I had to pick one, I would say when Woody and Forky are having their heart to heart after Forky jumps out the RV. Woody tries to make Forky understand the importance of his role as a toy which means Forky has the realisation that he is “Bonnie’s trash”. It’s one of those heart-warming scenes injected with humour which have become synonymous with the Toy Story franchise. Also, any scene with Duke Kaboom in because he is absolutely hilarious and his backstory was heartbreaking to watch.

Another thing to talk about is how amazing the animation is, in particular Bo Peep. The shine and reflective effect of her porcelein is an incredible development from the first film. It makes her look eerie at times but more delicate as well (she is porcelein after all!). When you look back to how she appeared in the first film, the animation doesn’t compare. I’m not dissing the first film because it achieved so much at the time of its release in regards to animation, but celebrating the achievements made since then and seeing that transformation in the span of 24 years is incredible. Also the textures of the plushes and ventriloquist dummies that appear in this film are equally fantastic.

I think that Toy Story 4 was well worth the wait and seemed like the true ending for the franchise. I think it will go on to win the Best Animated Feature at the Oscars next year (to be honest, it’s rare that a Disney film doesn’t win this) and I think it will date well as a film. I think what makes it work so well is that even though it follows on from the trilogy and the franchise, there is a different feel to it altogether because they’re not Andy’s toys anymore. With a new owner comes new changes and this opened up a door for new storylines and motives.

Categories
Uncategorised

Pixar Features Ranking: Films 11-15

This period saw the complete acquisition of Pixar by Disney, giving complete control to the Disney board on what projects should go ahead at Disney. Whereas John Lasseter had stopped sequels and remakes previously, Disney did the opposite at Pixar and wanted to capitalise on the loved characters that Pixar had created. Although with Toy Story 2 they had found success, other franchises were not as lucky and the films were met with lukewarm reviews which was pretty unheard of at Pixar but has sadly become more of the norm now.

If you want to read the other Pixar reviews and ranking you can click the links below:

Films 1-5

Films 6-10

Now without further ado, let’s begin with the reviews and rankings for Pixar films 11-15:

11) Toy Story 3 (2010)

The third segment of Toy Story 3 was built with hype in the months leading up to its release and it certainly didn’t disappoint. Following the toys’ adventure in a daycare centre as Andy heads off to college, Woody, Buzz and co face off against the manipulative Lotso and his henchmen who oppress the “weaker” toys. It’s brilliant and sassy, bringing everything we love about the franchise into an even bigger film. My favourite inclusion is Ken and his dream-house with the scene in which he shows Barbie his vintage clothes collection is clearly so well researched with the materials and textures impeccable as always. The scene where Barbie threatens to rip his clothes has me on edge as we see her ripping each individual thread apart is just as horrific as the now-iconic incinerator scene. Although not quite as good as Toy Story 2 in my opinion (although this is no insult), Toy Story 3 won the franchise its first Best Animated Feature Oscar with ease. Bringing in new toys courtesy of the daycare centre as well as Bonnie’s (the daycare assistant’s daughter) collection which features a Totoro and personal favourite, Mr. Pricklepants, a dramatic hedgehog teddy who loves Shakespearean style acting. Passing the toys onto Bonnie at the end seemed like a fitting ending for the franchise so it is exciting to see how Toy Story 4 will fare and if it will live up to its hype.

12) Cars 2 (2011)

I didn’t go into this film with high hopes because I am not a fan of the franchise and I think that Cars has been the weakest offering in Pixar by a long-shot so I was definitely surprised when they announced a sequel. Pretty much more of the same but with added spies, Lightning McQueen finds himself a love interest in the form of Holley Shiftwell. It’s racing, it’s boring and to be honest Lightning McQueen isn’t an engaging enough character to be the protagonist. I am happy that there is more focus on Mater in this film but he spends most of his screen-time getting berated by McQueen who is so focused on his image and looking cool that it seems the messages he learned from the first film are completely forgotten because of his egotism. I hate to be biased about it but it just doesn’t interest me as a franchise and as much as I try to enjoy these films, I simply struggle to because of how ridiculous the whole concept is.

13) Brave (2012)

Now for a film I was really excited to see in the cinema on its release day. Featuring Pixar’s first princess, Merida, Brave looked to be full of spirit as the princess longs for freedom and to fight the tradition of marriage as is expected of her. In the course of her rebellion, she argues with her mum who is then turned into a bear. This film is an odd because aesthetically, it is stunning and captures Medieval Scotland beautifully but the screenplay is imbalanced and poorly paced. The beginning and ending to this film are brilliantly done but the middle portion just doesn’t seem to fit. It feels as though there was so much focus in establishing Merida’s character and how her character will end up rather than establishing her character and the mum’s character and then developing their relationship in the typical Pixar way, with detail and finesse. The middle portion seems poorly planned and forced, making the film drag and bringing an underwhelming feeling to the audience. The general consensus was the same among critics and audiences who responded with mixed reviews although the film did do well at the box office and subsequently won the Best Animated Feature Oscar although this was in (admittedly) an underwhelming year overall.

14) Monsters University (2013)

The first prequel offered by Pixar was a surprising choice. Monsters University, as implied, follows Mike and Sulley in university and shows how they met and how their friendship developed. It feels formulaic in development, the two dislike each other with Sulley the jock type and Mike as a nerd, the two find common ground before using their strengths to win the “Scare Games”. It’s not a terrible film by any means but it is very cliche and feels underwhelming for a Pixar film. Although it received positive reviews, it doesn’t hold a light against Monsters, Inc. because it’s clear that this is a film that Disney has ordered to be made rather than an organic creation. In Sulley and Mike’s fraternity, there are a collection of cliche characters. Although basic, my favourite is Art, the creative hyper artsy type who is bright purple and rolls around super fast and likes shiny things. I’m glad that they chose to create a film set in a different environment in the monster universe because this does make it far removed from the original and therefore the impact of Monsters, Inc. hasn’t be tainted.

15) Inside Out (2015)

After several underwhelming offerings, Pixar appeared to get back into their stride with this masterpiece. The question the creators asked: what if feelings had feelings? The result is a brilliant portrayal of the emotions living inside a teenage girl, Riley after her parents force the family to move to San Francisco from their cosy life in Michigan. As Riley struggles to fit in, her major emotions: Joy, Anger, Disgust, Panic and Sadness also struggle to adjust to the situation. This sees Sadness outcast by Joy and the others which causes an imbalance when Joy and Sadness are accidentally sucked from “headquarters” and into Riley’s mind. Although the plot may appear simple, a teenage girl struggles to fit in, the Emotions’ journey is actually a complex one as they learn that they need each other to thrive in the environment. Joy learns that Riley needs Sadness in order to feel those moments of joy and that this isn’t always a bad thing even if it doesn’t feel nice in the moment. Although the most dense of the Pixar films, it isn’t without its lighter moments which are provided by Anger, Disgust and Panic, who are struggling to run headquarters with Joy. I don’t think Inside Out could have been made 20 years ago as people find it hard to talk about real and complex feelings, especially in a children’s film but now there is a wider awareness on mental health and the importance of this in young children. It is a film that can engage that younger audience, even if they don’t understand everything and as they grow, they will learn to understand it. Also, the inclusion of childhood imaginary friend, Bing Bong shows the importance of the child imagination from a young age as he helps Joy and Sadness find their way back to headquarters. It’s a brilliant film that will have you roaring with laughter one moment and then sobbing the next, making it as emotionally complex and rewarding as the film itself.

This ranking was a little easier because there were a few under-performers in my opinion. I think that Pixar thrives when able to produce original content because Pixar have established themselves as the innovator rather than the follower so it’s a shame that Disney are forcing the same structure on the studio as itself by creating sequels and prequels.

Here is my ranking:

1) Up (2009)

2) WALL-E (2008)

3) Toy Story 2 (1999)

4) Inside Out (2015)

5) Ratatouille (2007)

6) Toy Story 3 (2010)

7) Monsters, Inc. (2001)

8) Finding Nemo (2003)

9) The Incredibles (2004)

10) Toy Story (1995)

11) A Bug’s Life (1998)

12) Brave (2012)

13) Monsters University (2013)

14) Cars (2006)

15) Cars 2 (2011)

The next post will look at the last bunch of offerings that includes even more sequels but also gives a couple of originals so let’s hope this batch fares a little better than this bunch.

What do you think of the ranking now? Is it a surprise? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Disney Animated Classics: Numbers 36-40 Ranking

Now we’re on the end of the Disney Renaissance period and this subsequently lead to a dark time in the Disney repertoire as money seemed to become the main motivation for film production rather than the artistry or vision which Disney had wanted to push. It begins with the attempt to better Fantasia with a bigger budget but little imagination in Fatasia 2000 and this rut continues for the next decade so it will be on a couple of blogs.

As always, here are the links to the previous posts in case you need to catch up

Films 1-5

Films 6-10

Films 11-15

Films 16-20

Films 21-25

Films 26-30

Films 31-35

As ever, let’s get on with the reviews for films 36-40:

36) Mulan (1998)

Taking inspiration from the legendary woman who disguised as a male soldier so her disabled father didn’t have to fight in a war, Mulan is a story of courage and strength. In line with the Disney brand, darker themes are outbalanced by lighter entertainment in the form of her animal sidekick, Mushu (voiced superbly by Eddie Murphy). The film is home to my favourite Disney song “Make a Man Out of You” which I always belt out whenever the film is on (and admittedly, even if the film isn’t on). It’s not without its flaws as like its predecessors, Mulan has a tendency to fall into an array of Chinese, Japanese and Korean stereotypes just to name a few. It feels like a mesh of cultures rather than a positive fixation on Chinese culture. This could be why the film wasn’t successful in China. However, for all its faults, there is something about this film that I truly love. Mulan is not a typical Disney princess. She disobeys her father’s orders and is instantly an outsider in her community. She simply does not fit in. It is only when she impersonates a soldier that she finds her true destiny as a hero and saves China from the Hun invasion. Of course the film follows the traditional Disney trope of a love story between her and Captain Shang but this feels secondary to her mission in a way that love stories haven’t taken centre stage in Disney before. Granted that it is far from a perfect feminist portrayal but it is a huge improvement from the other Disney princess offerings that Disney were producing at the time.

37) Tarzan (1999)

Tarzan is the first Disney film I ever saw in the cinema and I remember being swept away on my booster seat by the animation and adventure this film brought. The songs (written by Phil Collins) are absolutely fantastic and the sequences of Tarzan riding through the trees are spectacular. The story of the boy raised by gorillas in the jungle who befriends English travelers, including the ever-so-posh Jane who he falls in love with. The film definitely has its highlights such as the scene in which Turk, Tarzan’s gorilla best friend and company break the goods in the camp the travelers had set up. The antagonist in this film comes in the form of Clayton, a hunter who has arrived with Jane and her father and aims to hunt down the gorillas. The climatic scene is tense and was scary to watch as a child as we watch Clayton’s demise in a fairly gruesome manner. The film does have its share of mild violence and the audience is shown this in the opening scene when Tarzan’s parents are killed by a jaguar. The animation team takes advantage of the details that are allowed in modern animation that wasn’t available when films like The Jungle Book was being made.

38) Fantasia 2000 (2000)

Ringing in the new millennium with a revived look at one of Disney’s most iconic films. Fantasia 2000 is bigger than its counterpart boasting a massive budget of $80-85 million; however, when watching the film, it seems that its only goal is to surpass the legacy of the original. It seems to be a film about celebrity and hype rather than heart and substance which the original has in spades. Instead of one narrator who briefly discusses each piece in between segments, there are celebrity introductions such as Quincy Jones and Angela Lansbury and they tend to go on for a while. Fantasia 2000 also features “The Sorcerer’s Apprentice” from the original but the other segments are completely new. Following the original’s concept of, abstract, character driven and plot driven stories, it seems that Fantasia 2000 is a poor copy of its predecessor and feels a bit pointless in creation. This isn’t to say it is bad but much like The Rescuers Down Under, it seems like a rehash of a classic that doesn’t need fixing in the first place.

39) Dinosaur (2000)

Another film that I remember vividly seeing in the cinema and loving to pieces. For the time it was released, the animation was really progressive and looked stunning, particularly the meteor shower scene. Inspired by the evolution segment in Fantasia and following the dinosaurs following the meteor shower and the fight to survive, we follow Aladar and his search for a new home with his lemur friends. Watching it when I was younger was a fun experience. It’s a simple story with basic characters but you can tell the huge budget went on the style rather than substance. This is where the flaws come in watching it as an adult. I’m now at a point where a film has to really be revolutionary in style and look fantastic to make up for basic characters but the animation now looks dated and sadly doesn’t fix the poor writing or character development. It is such a disappointment because I enjoyed it so much as a kid and re-watching the films now, I actually find that I enjoy it the least. The film

40) The Emperor’s New Groove (2000)

A favourite among the millennial audience, The Emperor’s New Groove is the hilarious story of the selfish Emperor Kuzco who is turned into a llama by his advisor, Yzma. He awakes in a village he threatened to knock down for a pool house and together with village chief, Pacha, he has to make his way home and stop Yzma from ruling the kingdom. The kingdom isn’t specifically named but it appears to be a mesh of Aztec and Mayan culture which makes it similar to Mulan in that respect; however, because the era and place isn’t specified, this aspect isn’t made as obvious to the audience in the way that Mulan was. The animation reflects Aztec art with sharp lines and regal colouring, golds and purple decorate the palace in abundance. It’s a bizarre film that sees the sarcasm turned up to a ten and the quirky humour can be off-putting to some but it seems to be a real hit with millennials. I love the writing in this film and how bizarre it is and a big special mention to Eartha Kitt for her amazing voice work as villainess, Yzma. One part evil and another part theatrical, Yzma is one of the most underrated villains in Disney. Accompanied by her sidekick, Kronk, she is even more detached from the public than Kuzco which makes for some comical moments in the film such as when Pacha’s family prank them both.

The list is getting huge now and I’m surprised with myself by where some of these have placed. Not long to go now until we’re up to date with the Disney catalogue with the newest offering, Frozen 2 being released later this year. It’ll be interesting to see where that will place. Now onto the important part of the blog!

Here is my ranking:

1) Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937)

2) Fantasia (1940)

3) Beauty and the Beast (1991)

4) Sleeping Beauty (1959)

5) Bambi (1942)

6) The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh (1977)

7) The Lion King (1994)

8) Mulan (1998)

9) The Little Mermaid (1989)

10) Alice in Wonderland (1951)

11) Aladdin (1992)

12) The Aristocats (1971)

13) One Hundred and One Dalmatians (1961)

14) The Emperor’s New Groove (2000)

15) The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1996)

16) Peter Pan (1953)

17) The Three Caballeros (1945)

18) Pinocchio (1940)

19) Pocahontas (1995)

20) Tarzan (1999)

21) Dumbo (1941)

22) Hercules (1997)

23) The Black Cauldron (1985)

24) The Great Mouse Detective (1986)

25) The Jungle Book (1967)

26) The Sword in the Stone (1963)

27) Cinderella (1950)

28) The Rescuers (1977)

29) Robin Hood (1973)

30) Oliver & Company (1988)

31) Lady and the Tramp (1955)

32) The Fox and the Hound (1981)

33) Fun and Fancy Free (1947)

34) The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr. Toad (1949)

35) Saludos Amigos (1943)

36) Melody Time (1948)

37) Fantasia 2000 (2000)

38) The Rescuers Down Under (1990)

39) Make Mine Music (1946)

40) Dinosaur (2000)

Tune in for my next post where I will be delving further into the dark period of Disney where we look at films that were critically and commercially panned across the board. These films are not among Disney’s highlights but they soon make way for a new wave of modern masterpieces in the same vein of the Disney Renaissance.

What do you think of the ranking? What would be your number one choice? Let me know in the comments !

Categories
Uncategorised

Pixar Features Ranking: Films 6-10

These five years of Pixar revolutionised film not just in terms of animation (which it did in spades) but for film as a whole with their limitless imagination, stellar scripts and characters that stay with you long after you leave the cinema. Pixar by this point had established themselves as a respected animation company that alongside Disney dominated the family market and with an Academy Award under their belt, it’s needless to say that this merely predicted further success. Utilising the creativity of directors such as Brad Bird and in-house artists such as Pete Docter and Andrew Stanton, this period of films cemented Pixar’s legacy firmly in film history.

You can read the ranking for the previous link here:

Films 1-5

As ever, let’s get on with the reviews and rankings for Pixar films 6-10:

6) The Incredibles (2004)

Before the superhero film became a monthly fixture in our movie calendars, Brad Bird teamed with Pixar to create a world where superheroes have been outcast but must come out to fight against a narcissistic billionaire who has been killing superheroes in a bid to become a saviour to the human race. The superheroes set out on saving the world are The Incredible family, consisting of dad, Bob (known as Mr Incredible), mum, Helen (known as Elastagirl), teenage daughter, Violet and son, Dash. The family use their unique abilities to save the world from Syndrome, the billionaire set on revenge against Mr. Incredible, whom he idolised as a child. It’s a brilliantly complex film that depicts an ordinary family in an extraordinary situation. The script is second to none, the score is sublime and the primary characters are all developed fantastically with likable secondary characters in the form of fellow superhero, Frozone (Samuel L. Jackson on top form) and the iconic superhero outfit designer, Edna Mode (voice by the film’s director, Brad Bird). I would say that this film surpasses most of the superhero films that are churned out month after month in recent years as it follows the formulaic route without becoming victim to it. Elastagirl is a brilliant female character who isn’t afraid to stick up to the patriarchy (even in the film’s opening when she says “leave all the fighting to the men? I don’t think so!”). It’s a film that is aware of society’s expectations but thwarts them by exploiting the flaws in society and using the heroes strengths to fix them.

7) Cars (2006)

Created from a love of cars by the heads of Pixar, Cars is a film set in a universe of anthropomorphic cars. It tells the story of Lightning McQueen, a sports car who longs to win at a rescheduled race after finishing in a three-way tie. On his way to training, he finds himself in a crash and stumbles upon Radiator Springs, a small town tucked away in the middle of nowhere. He befriends Mater, a battered tow truck and his experience among the small townspeople teaches Lightning lessons in humility and respect. This film has spawned two sequels as well as spin-off films and is popular among the younger audience particularly; however, I am not a huge fan of the Cars franchise. Even from the first viewing, I couldn’t wrap my head around the idea of anthropomorphic cars which sounds ridiculous in the world of Pixar because anything in animation is possible. Living toys, monsters and animals in general I am perfectly fine with, but I just can’t immerse myself in the Cars universe because it seems a little too ridiculous. I can’t help but think that the idea itself is rather forced and inorganic unlike the other films that Pixar had offered up to this point. Maybe this had to do with Disney’s increasing power in the company or the slump Disney studios where experiencing lately but it just seemed that the heads of Pixar sat down and said “we like cars… let’s make a film about it!” and didn’t think about the logistics of this. Monsters. Inc. is a film about monsters in their own universe and yet they have access to the human universe so there is an awareness of the “real world”. But since Cars doesn’t have any humans at all, it pushes the film into an absurd territory of the audience asking questions about the technicalities of the universe rather than enjoying the film.

8) Ratatouille (2007)

Brad Bird’s second offering for Pixar, Ratatouille, is the story of a rat with a big dream, to become a gourmet chef in a Michelin star restaurant. Remy lives on the outskirts of Paris, but when he finds himself in one of the most iconic Parisian restaurants, Gusteau’s, he begins to use his talents to help out the chef and prevent the restaurant from closure. Like any animation that incorporates food (check out Studio Ghibli’s offerings), Ratatouille’s concoctions look delectable and good enough to eat off the screen. As ever, the detail is on point and makes the film appear to be a sensory experience. Remy is an adorable protagonist who fights against the odds to achieve his dream despite what his family says or expects of him. His determination to teach Gusteau’s son, Alfredo, the ropes of cooking with hilarious results with Remy controlling Alfredo like a marionette by pulling his hair. Another brilliant character in this film is the lovable Emile, Remy’s brother and best friend. He’s a rat who loves to eat food without savouring the taste which repulses Remy, who urges Emile to appreciate the food. The film boasts a starry cast with Patton Oswalt voicing Remy and Peter O’Toole as Anton Ego, the pretentious food critic that Remy longs to impress. It won the studio it’s third Best Animated Feature Oscar and remains a Pixar favourite among fans.

9) WALL-E (2008)

Pixar’s 2008 feature is set in a world that has seen the mankind abuse the earth so much that it is now inhabitable. The film was directed by major Pixar figure, Andrew Stanton and tells the story of WALL-E, a friendly robot who sorts out the trash left and organises it into piles. His daily routine is constant as he is the only “living” thing with the exception of cockroaches. WALL-E collects trinkets that he finds and takes them back to his home where he watches old films on a box television. When a mysterious robot called EVE visits earth, WALL-E instantly in love with her and longs to be with her. Together, they embark on an adventure that sees them dancing among the stars in a stellar sequence that is mind-blowing and encountering what is left of the human race on a spaceship. On the surface, it’s a beautiful love story communicated through actions and shows how far someone would travel (literally) for the one they love. Under the surface, it is a story about mankind’s continued abuse on the planet we live on and how greed and corruption will eventually cause the world to ruin. It’s a film that was made over a decade ago but feels even more relevant now than ever in a time where the push for climate change has never been stronger.

10) Up (2009)

This film is too good for words. Pete Docter’s creation is beautifully animated as expected, filled with a spectrum of colour (courtesy of 20,000 animated balloons) and has, arguably, the most emotional opening to a film ever. Following pensioner, Carl as he flies his house to Paradise Falls (the place he longed to visit with late wife, Ellie), he is accompanied by boy scout, Russell, exotic bird, Kevin and talking dog, Doug in a big to find peace and fulfill the mission he has worked on for years. I couldn’t tell you the amount of times that I have watched this film but I can say that 100% of the times I have seen it have ended with me in tears with a box of tissues by my side. Featuring a brilliantly sinister performance from Christopher Plummer voicing Carl’s childhood idol, Charles Muntz, an explorer who was disgraced earlier in his career, Up is a film that swept the critics and audience away with its beauty and heart. As I mentioned before, it features the most emotional opening to a film ever and I think I should discuss this scene in detail. We follow Carl and Ellie’s relationship from marriage to Ellie’s death and the highs and lows in between as they struggle (and sadly fail) to save up for a trip to Paradise Falls. It is a sequence with no words, only music and this only heightens the opening. The jaunty score shows them renovating and decorating their home then slowly descends into a sad clarinet as they struggle to conceive and Ellie eventually ends up passing away. It’s a poignant story and a really powerful message to put in a children’s film, especially in the opening when it isn’t expected. I think this was revolutionary in Pixar storytelling because they are explicitly showing the love and eventual heartbreak and sadness that comes with being human.

Again, this ranking took me ages to decide because the films are of such a high calibre but I have made some (arguably controversial) decisions. I think the quality of films from this period was so strong (with the exception of Cars) that it was so hard to place them among the previous films.

Here is my ranking:

1) Up (2009)

2) WALL-E (2008)

3) Toy Story 2 (1999)

4) Ratatouille (2007)

5) Monsters, Inc. (2001)

6) Finding Nemo (2003)

7) The Incredibles (2004)
8) Toy Story (1995)

9) A Bug’s Life (1998)

10) Cars (2006)

The next post begins to delve into Disney’s takeover seeing Pixar create sequels and prequels galore as well as the first Pixar princess and more Oscar winners.

What do you think of the ranking so far? Let me know in the comments below what you’d place as number one!

Categories
Uncategorised

Pixar Features Ranking: Films 1-5

As with the Disney Animated Classics rankings that I am currently working on, I always thought it would be a nice idea to give myself another impossible challenge of ranking the amazing films from Disney Pixar. Founded in 1986 to pave the way for computer animation, Pixar has since become an icon in the world of film and has made its name in animation. After making a small collection of short films, includings the iconic Luxo Jr, director John Lasseter thought it would be a great idea to translate this new animation into a feature and thus Toy Story was created and a new phenomena was formed. Since then Pixar has been completely acquired by Disney and its global popularity is attributed to the quality writing, memorable characters and the stunning aesthetic.

It’s only natural then to task myself with the challenge of ranking their brilliant offerings. Of course this shouldn’t take as long as they have 20 features in their repertoire (excluding Toy Story 4 which is released later this month). I will discuss 5 films per blog and if I have seen it in time, I will also include Toy Story 4 in the ranking.

Here we go with Pixar films 1-5:

1) Toy Story (1995)

The film that revolutionised animation and sparked wonder for many generations, Toy Story really is a film like no other. The plot is fairly simple, what would happen if your toys could come to life. When Andy receives a Buzz Lightyear for his birthday, leader of toys Woody becomes threatened as he isn’t the favourite toy anymore. Aside from becoming the Pixar aesthetic, computer animation has proven to be the popular animation among audiences and therefore all major animation studios have tended to follow in Pixar’s footsteps. Even Disney Studio ceased production on hand-drawn animation after the release of 2011’s Winnie the Pooh. Although hugely expensive at the time of Toy Story’s release, computer animation has turned into the cheaper and less time-consuming of animation and tends to be the familiar style that audiences today expect. There are a lot of scenes in this film that standout so I’ll go through a couple. First there is the scene when the toys and the audience are introduced to Buzz as he stands on the bed with confidence. The toys are perplexed by this stranger but immediately take to him as he shows off his actions and moves (not to mention to important backstory of Star Command). It’s a scene that immediately reveals Woody’s jealousy and inability to really control the other toys, who he sees as lesser beings. The conflict between the two characters is immediate but communicated through body language and the toy’s abilities themselves. Comparing Woody’s old-school string pull on his back to Buzz’s abundance of buttons and wings shows no contest as Woody must face this new era in Andy’s life and the toys follow suit. Later on in the film when Woody and Buzz are kidnapped by Sid, a kid who likes to destroy his toys and lives across the street from Andy, Buzz realises that he just a toy and not a spaceman. When he says those famous words “to infinity and beyond…” and jumps to fly, falling down and landing at the foot of the stairs, Buzz is physically and emotionally broken. His realisation sends him into a breakdown (cue Mrs. Nesbitt) and the friendship develops between himself and Woody as they respect each other as equals. The film is simple in plot but the importance of this film cannot be understated for its contributions to animation (and rightly received an Honorary Oscar for this) and complexities within the plot allow the characters to truly develop and bring the characters to life from this perspective.

2) A Bug’s Life (1998)

If Pixar’s first offering was all about bringing life to inanimate objects then the second offering is all about bringing the Pixar DNA to nature. Following clumsy inventor, Flik, A Bug’s Life explores how one ant has the courage to face off an oppressive group of grasshoppers who threaten to destroy the ant colony if they don’t provide enough food. A Bug’s Life provides one of my favourite characters in the Pixar universe in the form of hilarious caterpillar, Heimlich (voiced by the late Joe Ranft). This German legend just wants to gain his wings and the payoff at the end of the film is golden. Although not as well-received as its predecessor, A Bug’s Life has its charm and is still a brilliant film. It also challenged Pixar to create different textures as the setting is in nature so they had to consider how the weather affects the environment and the insects themselves. The lead grasshopper, Hopper (voiced by Kevin Spacey) is cruel and relentless in his approach to ruling the colony, gas-lighting the ants into believing that they need the grasshopper’s protection when in fact, they outnumber the grasshoppers at least 100 to 1. The number of ants was an impressive feat to animate as well as the animators had never attempted to create so many characters onscreen at any one time before. This is only a small detail and only for a couple of seconds in a scene but it’s important to acknowledge these seemingly little challenges have helped make computer animation as flawless and progressive as it is today.

3) Toy Story 2 (1999)

Toy Story 2 is one of those rare sequels that, in my opinion, surpasses the original. Woody is stolen by a toy collector who plans to ship him off to a museum in Japan. Flipping the situation around so Woody becomes disillusioned with his own legacy as part of “Woody’s Roundup”, a television show in which he is the star, it is up to Buzz and co to save him and bring him back before Andy comes home from summer camp. This film introduces us to a variety of new iconic toys, particularly cowgirl Jessie and loyal steed Bullseye. Everything in this installment is sharper from the animation to the character development to the scores and songs (who doesn’t cry at “When She Loved Me”?). It’s my favourite of the Toy Story films so far and I don’t think Toy Story 4 will usurp it (not because it will be bad but because Toy Story 2 is genius in every way). What makes this film as brilliant as it is is Pixar’s ability to identify what worked well in the original and to elaborate on that so incorporating more branded toys as a way to create familiarity with the audience and creating a villain who is even more unsympathetic than the original. There are two antagonists in this film with the first being Al, owner of Al’s Toy Barn and mad toy collector who kidnaps Woody at the start of the film. He lives alone opposite his shop surrounded by his extensive Woody’s Roundup toy collection. The little we see of him shows that he doesn’t have any friends and he is rude and aggressive to everyone he meets. The idea that he is a collector should suggest passion which could have been a redeeming feature but he only plans to sell it showing that he only sees the toys as money rather than sentimental in the way that Andy does. The second villain is Stinky Pete, the Prospector who has been kept in his box in mint condition for years as the toys have waited for Woody. Voiced by Kelsey Grammer, Stinky Pete is kind and paternal on the surface but underneath he is mean and controlling, much like Al. I think it was smart to incorporate a toy villain as it is someone the characters can actually exchange conversation with and build that conflict fully.

4) Monsters, Inc. (2001)

The next step Pixar took was to create an entirely new universe altogether for this film about a world populated by monsters. Pete Docter’s feature length directorial debut, Monsters, Inc. follows Sulley (voiced by John Goodman), the best “scarer” at the titular place where children’s screams fuel the city’s energy supply and his assistant, Mike (Billy Crystal) as they encounter a toddler who has wandered into the monster world. This film allowed the animators to push the bar as far as they could and the result is a brilliantly original burst of colour. The writing is superb as expected from Pixar and casting Crystal was a great choice as it appeared that his quick wit and ability to spontaneously burst into song was perfect for the role of Mike. Another highlight in this film for me is the textures given to the monsters, in particular the fur. The detail is impeccable and the city looks just like a regular city to make the concept of this monster universe believable to the audience. It’s a film that elevated my imagination as a kid, especially the scene with all the doors as Mike and Sulley venture through different worlds. The scene with the abominable snowman is fantastic as it’s set in the snowy mountains but despite the lack of props on the screen, the detail in the snow and rocks is groundbreaking. It seems that at this point, Pixar are seeing how big they can go with their universe creation and the details and characters shown in Monsters, Inc. are created so impeccably that this easily could have turned into a franchise with numerous sequels and reboots rather than just one prequel, Monsters University which was released in 2013.

5) Finding Nemo (2003)

The fifth film in Pixar’s catalogue is a heart-warming tale of Marlin the clown-fish and his journey across the ocean to find his missing son, Nemo. Accompanied by the lovable and forgetful, Dory, they venture into the unknown encountering sharks, jellyfish and turtles to name a few in a bid to bring Nemo back home after he is captured by a scuba diver. With Andrew Stanton in the director’s chair, the film has one of the most heartbreaking opening scenes that always leaves me in tears. The first Pixar film to win the Academy Award for Best Animated Feature (Monster’s, Inc. was the first film that could have won but it lost to Shrek), Finding Nemo is about the importance of family but equally the importance of freedom and allowing kids to have the space to explore. The big seller of this film is Dory, a John Dory with short-term memory loss and her unrelenting optimism as she helps Marlin search for Nemo which helps keep the film light for the younger audience but there are so many mature undertones to this film that makes it a thrill to watch as an adult. It isn’t afraid to show vulnerability and flaws in its protagonist and the script allows for real growth in both Marlin and Nemo as both realise the importance the other has in their life. On another level, the Pixar studio also raised the importance of preserving marine wildlife which although subtle in this film, is made all the more clearer in its sequel, Finding Dory. Directed by Andrew Stanton, Finding Nemo is a beautiful adventure under the sea that brings even more colour and imagination than the previous films made by the studio.

So that’s it for the first bunch of Pixar films. Now since Pixar’s catalogue is a lot shorter than the Disney Studio’s, this series will only consist of four posts but that doesn’t mean it won’t be hard to rank. I found it difficult with this post alone because Pixar have such a strong repertoire of films that show off just how far the imagination can be stretched; however, after (literally) hours of deciding, I have managed to rank them.

Here is my ranking:

1) Toy Story 2 (1999)

2) Monsters, Inc. (2001)

3) Finding Nemo (2003)

4) Toy Story (1995)

5) A Bug’s Life (1998)

My next post will look at what I believe to be the best offerings from Pixar as we delve into more Oscar winners and even the second animation ever to receive an Academy Award nomination for Best Picture (even more of an achievement than Beauty and the Beast as there is now the Best Animated Feature category as well so it even exceeded that!).

In the meantime, what do you think of my ranking so far? What would you put as number one? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Women’s Voice In Film

Women in film has become a huge talking point for film development in recent years, partially due to the #metoo movement that outed the abusive patriarchy in film seeing women given less power both in representation and finance. A lot of discussion on the internet (from men mostly) questioning whether there truly is a problem in the first place, do the women deserve the harassment they face and most importantly, do we really need these gender swap remakes? The answers to these questions are simply: yes there is a problem, no a woman never deserves harassment and of course we need as much female representation as possible.

It’s not secret that the days of Golden Hollywood, although seemingly flawless and iconic, foresaw the way women in film were treated by their bosses (producers and directors). From the infamous “casting couch” to the manipulative studio contracts, Hollywood presented itself as a mecca of dreams but proved to be a breaking point of mental illness, drug and alcohol misuse and domestic abuse. This period sees the breakdown of many stars including Judy Garland, Marilyn Monroe and Bette Davis just to name a few. It seemed that solace could only be found at the bottom of a whiskey glass.

So what does this issue have to do with Hollywood today?

Well, to begin with, despite the elimination of studio contracts in the 50s due to the collapse of the Hollywood studio structure, it appears that female filmmaking is still viewed as a niche rather than as an equal offering. The fact that we even discuss a film as “female” or celebrate female creators and strong female characters shouldn’t be something we celebrate in the 21st century. Especially considering that we’re at a century of accessible filmmaking that has distributed across the globe. AFter everything that has happened globally regarding women’s issues such as voting rights, reproductive rights, fighting the wage gap, it’s unsurprising that the fight for the female experience through a woman’s perspective has been equally difficult. After all, film is a brilliant and affordable medium to translate issues to a global audience using visuals to gain awareness for issues. Take last year’s Oscar-winning short documentary Period. End of Sentence. that looks at female poverty in India where women are forced to quit school due to periods as they are unablt to afford sanitary products. In terms of fictional feature films, we have seen a resurgence of female driven comedies with Bridesmaids accredited with starting this trend. Other offerings in recent years have reverted back to teenage years with 2019’s Booksmart and 2017’s Lady Bird among the big fish. it’s great to see original stories created by women being given mainstream releases and have subsequently done well in the awards circuit. As well as comedies, we have also seen female-centred dramas such as Todd Haynes’ beautiful and iconic LGBT love story Carol (you can read my review here) starring Cate Blanchett and Rooney Mara, which I would argue is the best love film of the century so far. Now these Indie films do incredibly well, but why hasn’t this translated as well into mainstream films? I’ll try to break this down.

It’s known that the majority of people who will go and see an original story created and performed by women is going to be seen by women. That’s all well and good but considering that men are the majority of the cinematic audience statistically, it’s important to get men to see films created and performed by women too. This is for a number of reasons and since the film industry is a business, the most important issue is money. If more men see the films then more money is given to the filmmakers and then more films created by women can be made which would eventually make the idea of the “female film” as old and traditional as the Golden Age of Hollywood. This brings me to the gender swap remakes. If you looked at the highest grossing films in recent years, chances are that they are filled with sequels, reboots, prequels and remakes. Using this information, it is a smart idea that in order to bring a female perspective to a high-grossing film, you must incorporate strong female roles into these films. However, this hasn’t been without a share of complaints from a small portion of the male audience. Take the Marvel and DC Universes for example. Admittedly, I am not a huge fan of the Marvel Universe but I have never heard such negativity from a male audience regarding it’s iconic female characters before. It seems that every other film is released with no issue, Marvel films particularly tend to sell out every initial screening and exceed in both critic and audience circles so when they decided to do a film dedicated to Captain Marvel, this should have been a celebration for a strong female character to join the achievements of its predecessors; however, this sadly wasn’t the case. A portion of the male audience was outraged by Brie Larson’s interpretation of the role as well as her feminist statements. It’s all well and good when the male superheros want to prove their stereotyped masculinity (which is an old school trope that Marvel appear to be fighting as well by bringing vulnerability into the male characters) but when Captain Marvel doesn’t need a man to save the world and more importantly, doesn’t want a man with her to save the world, this is a major issue. It was a role that should have been celebrated but instead, while Endgame was adored for bringing its emotion to the male characters (Iron Man specifically), Captain Marvel is viewed in a negative light because she veers away from the traditional “eye-candy” trope that Golden Hollywood has been feeding the audience with for years. I hope that as these franchises expand and more female characters are incorporated into their respected universes, the male audience that openly despises the likes of Captain Marvel and Wonder Woman may be open to the idea of the strong, independent women without thinking of them as simple love interests or sidekicks rather than the leaders of their own stories. Despite this small male audience who tweet outrageously about the femalecentred films, DC is clearly proud of the overwhelming success of Wonder Woman as they are bringing Patty Jenkins back for the second film (I did actually enjoy Wonder Woman! The first segment featuring the Amazonians is astonishing direction and writing).

I am not writing this article to be negative or bash the male audience because the male audience is important to the plight of female filmmaking as well and it is only a small portion. I think that there has to be an understanding that it is much harder for a woman to get a film made than a man. Once that statement is understood and acknowledged then the discussion of female film becomes a welcome idea and celebrated. But in a world where the Indie films created by women are renowned for their originality, why do we need gender swapped films such as Ghostbusters? Do we actually need them?

As I said at the top of this article… yes, yes we do!

Why do we need them? By remaking films with gender swapped protagonists, it gives the audience a new perspective on a femiliar setting. It’s easy to be angered when a classic like Ghostbusters is given an update with the best female comedians much like the original with men. It’s a brilliant film by itself (it obviously isn’t as good as the original) but I don’t think the intention was to “outdo” the original. I think it was to show that women could be given an ordinary role without the woman part being of any importance. I think that if Ghostbusters was remade with a male cast, there would be the usual complaints of “we don’t need a remake” but the abuse hurled at the stars of the film showed that there is sexist view from this portion of male audience. It seems to not only be that women have “taken” the roles, but that women are put in powerful positions without being the love interest. There is also an argument that representation is important and when given the opportunity to make these remakes, it’s another opportunity to put women in the driving seat which is only a positive.

Some of the films I love such as Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and Frances Ha feature brilliant female characters. Clementine Kruczynski (played fantastically by Kate Winslet) in the former and Greta Gerwig as the quirky titular character in the latter are women who have their flaws and struggles but at the end of the day, are independent and strong. Both films directed by men but show the important of strong female presence in film. Eternal Sunshine’s script won the Best Original Screenplay Academy Award suggesting that there is a demand for these female characters. Another film that is a force of nature is 2016’s Turkish offering, Mustang, about five young sisters who are forced into marriage after wrongly being accused of sexual activity with a group of boys in their class at school. Written and directed by Deniz Gamze Erguven in her directorial debut, Mustang is one of the best films I have ever seen. The film is shown through the eyes of the youngest sister, Lale, giving the audience an innocent glimpse into an oppressive world without explicitly saying so. Much like the message of the film, the writing and directing is subtle with a lot of stillness and peace in moments of chaos. Another brilliant female-led offering is 2018’s The Favourite which was hugely snubbed in the Oscars this year and has not one, not two but THREE stellar leads in the form of Olivia Colman as Queen Anne (who deservedly won an Oscar for her performance) and Rachel Weisz and Emma Stone as the women vying for the queen’s attention. It’s a complex triangle of lust, power and manipulation. This answers the question whether women can carry a film with a resounding YES!

At the end of it all, more needs to be done to finance and distribute mainstream films created by and starring women but this isn’t to say that none exist at all and the offerings we have had in recent years particularly show a huge improvement to the films of the Golden Era. Women have proven time and time again that they can create films that are both critical and commercial (when given the chance) successes.

What are your favourite films created by and/or starring women? Let me know in the comments below?