Tag: Cate Blanchett

Categories
Uncategorised

Nightmare Alley (2021)

Bradley Cooper in the film NIGHTMARE ALLEY. Photo by Kerry Hayes. © 2021 20th Century Studios All Rights Reserved

Hollywood has been going through a period of nostalgia in recent years. We have seen an abundance of franchises, sequels, prequels, reboots and remakes dominating the cinematic landscape, and it’s easy to understand why. These films provide a sense of comfort and escapism for audiences as they offer a sense of familiarity. One such example is Guillermo del Toro’s latest release, Nightmare Alley, which is based on the 1946 novel of the same name by William Lindsay Gresham and the second film adaptation following the iconic 1946 film noir of the same name that stars Tyrone Power and Joan Blondell. The film follows protagonist Stanton “Stan” Carlisle (Bradley Cooper), a man who becomes a carny after killing his father and burning his house down. During his tenure at the carnival, he becomes interested in Mentalism, eventually falling in love with carny Molly (Rooney Mara) and the two leave the carnival to embark on their own touring act with dire consequences. With a starry cast led by Cooper and Rooney, while also featuring the likes of Cate Blanchett, Toni Collette, Richard Jenkins and Willem Dafoe among many more, Nightmare Alley is a staggering 150-minute mammoth of a film that chronicles the rise and fall of its protagonist is flamboyant fashion that is every bit a carnival attraction in itself.

The film is directed by Guillermo del Toro who co-wrote the screenplay with Kim Morgan. As expected from a del Toro film, the direction is stellar and captivating with meticulous detail and precision in every frame. Where del Toro’s Oscar-winning The Shape of Water has its fixations on the aquatic and incorporates this element into the aesthetic and flowing nature of the film, Nightmare Alley literally opens in flames as Stan sets his father’s house on fire. This fiery nature runs through the entire film as we see Stan revisit this moment time and time again, especially in moments of reflection. Where the film experiences somewhat of a downfall is in the writing as the pacing doesn’t feel as consistent throughout. The audience is thrown into the events as Stan sets fire to the house and immediately boards a bus that takes him to the carnival; however, the film soon slows down in pacing, especially during the final act and there are far too many endings.

Bradley Cooper takes on the lead role of Stan that was originally played by film noir icon, Tyrone Power in the original 1947 film. Cooper has established himself as one of Hollywood’s best leading men having garnered nine Oscar nominations with four of these being in acting. He is the perfect choice for Stan and has that brilliant Southern drawl and charisma needed for the role as the character works his way up the social ladder. What makes Cooper’s performance so captivating is how unpredictable he is and the way that the audience learns more about him throughout the film. It is within the second half of the film that we discover the whole truth about what happened between him and his dad. While Tyrone Power will always be associated with the role of Stan, Cooper doesn’t try to copy or imitate his performance but provides a darker angle that lends to his unpredictability.

Playing Molly is Rooney Mara, who proves that there is a lot to this role than meets the eye. To assume that Molly is simply Stan’s love interest is to dismiss this incredible performance as Molly has plenty of personal freedom and doesn’t feel pressure to take her time in deciding what she wants to do with her life. Mara is the perfect onscreen partner for Cooper because she is always capable of delivering performances that are more subtle but still pack their punch. While Cooper’s performance is big and loud, Mara provides a nuanced and quieter performance that still holds plenty of power and shouldn’t be overlooked. What makes Rooney Mara one of the best actresses working today is her adaptability and ability to steal a scene while also playing well against others when needed.

The second half of the film is dominated by Cate Blanchett who plays the mysterious psychologist Dr. Lilith Ritter. Her first scene comes later in the film as she attends one of Stan and Molly’s shows, attempting to uncover their tricks. Blanchett’s Lilith seems charming and disarming as she manages to seduce Stan over time as they come together to scam wealthy men by pretending that Stan can communicate with the dead when he is using information that Lilith has been feeding him as they were patients of her. Blanchett’s final scene is genuinely terrifying and shows a darker range to her acting that we haven’t really seen before.

Another brilliant performance worth mentioning comes from the always brilliant, Richard Jenkins, who plays the unpredictable and eccentric Ezra Grindle. Grindle is an extremely intimidating man and incredibly wealthy to the point where the money blinds Stan from the blatant threats that are present. Jenkins provides unsettling energy to Grindle and even though he isn’t in a lot of scenes in the film, he steals the scenes that he is in. Despite the limited amount of screen time, we learn so much about Grindle’s character and want to learn more thanks to Jenkins’ impeccable performance.

Nightmare Alley may not have the same level of magic that del Toro brought with The Shape of Water, but it cannot be denied that he is a true visionary and is always capable of creating beautiful aesthetics and drawing out brilliant performances from the star-studded cast. Where Nightmare Alley falls short is its writing as it feels like two completely different films that have been combined yet don’t quite tonally mesh, while the film’s length runs for too long. If there was more tonal connection and consistency throughout and a shorter running time, this would be viewed as a front-runner in the awards season.

What did you think of Nightmare Alley? Let me know in the comments below!

Nightmare Alley is out in cinemas now!

Categories
Uncategorised

Don’t Look Up (2021)

Netflix’s Don’t Look Up is one of the most talked about films of recent months thanks to the cast which is packed with A-listers. Adam McKay’s dark comedy follows a research team followed by Dr. Randall Mindy (Leonardo DiCaprio) who discover that a huge comet is heading straight for Earth and will destroy it within a matter of months. Mindy and researcher, Kate Dibiasky (Jennifer Lawrence) head to the White House to convince the President (Meryl Streep) to destroy the comet before it hits the planet. With plenty of storylines and characters, Don’t Look Up is a film that has garnered polarising reviews with some loving the message on climate change while others feel that the execution falls short.

The film is directed and written by Adam McKay, whose previous efforts include 2018’s Vice and 2015’s The Big Short which combine politics and comedy. McKay is interested in recent political events and Don’t Look Up is his take on climate change. What made The Big Short and Vice so effective is that they had a tighter focus on a few characters so the films had a better flow in terms of the writing and direction. Don’t Look Up is a film that is filled with the world’s biggest stars and McKay clearly wants to give everyone a fair share of screentime. Unfortunately, the result of which seems to be a who’s who of Hollywood and the writing is crammed with too many storylines that it seems jilted in structure. It feels like the screenplay needed to go through an extra draft to finesse the story and ensure that the film has a better flow.

Jennifer Lawrence plays researcher, Kate Dibiasky, who is credited with discovering the comet, which is suitably named Dibiasky Comet. Dibiasky appears to be the voice of reason throughout the film although doesn’t have the skills to communicate her view properly which angers the authorities. Lawrence’s performance is perfect as she captures Kate’s feelings of despair and her outspoken nature. It’s great seeing Lawrence and DiCaprio act opposite one another and it feels like Lawrence actually steals the show thanks to the amount of depth that she brings to the performance. Don’t Look Up allows us to see Lawrence in a different kind of comical role that we haven’t seen from her before and she delivers.

In the male leading role is Leonardo DiCaprio who portrays research leader, Dr. Randall Mindy. As always, DiCaprio can be relied upon to give a great performance which he does but it does feel as though his character isn’t given much to play with in the same way that Dibiasky is. There are certain decisions that McKay made for the character which seem a bit confusing such as having Randall embark on an affair with news reporter, Brie (Cate Blanchett) which doesn’t add a lot to the overall plot while taking up a lot of time. What is confusing about this development is that it contrasts to everything else we learn about Randall and the way he lives his life. His affair seems to show that he is just as bad and sleazy as the authorities who want to mine the comet for minerals. Despite this, DiCaprio does a great job with what he’s given.

The supporting cast is absolutely huge and is led by none other than Meryl Streep and Jonah Hill as President Janie Orlean and her son, Jason Orlean, who is also Chief of Staff, respectively. Having Streep playing a President was bound to happen sooner or later, but rather than be a reliable source of wisdom and leadership, Janie Orlean is manipulative and power and money-hungry, seeing the comet as a money-making opportunity rather than a threat. Jason also proves himself to be extremely under-qualified for his role and has clearly gotten to where he is thanks to nepotism. The role of Janie Orlean feels a bit underwhelming in terms of development, which is a shame when you have Meryl Streep in the role while Jonah Hill is clearly given the chance to improvise and do what his does best – insult people within an inch of their lives in a hilarious way.

Don’t Look Up is a film that wears its message on its sleeve, but the execution falls a bit short due to the screenplay, which tends to flit around a lot. McKay has proven that he can work with an ensemble task and has even won an Oscar for his screenplay for The Big Short, but the magic he creates blending comedy and politics seems a bit lost amongst all the characters. It feels as though some storylines don’t blend well with each other, which may be the reason it has had such polarising opinions. This isn’t to say that Don’t Look Up is a film without its positives, however, as Jennifer Lawrence provides an excellent performance and Jonah Hill is a comedic standout in a role that feels like a classic Hill performance but it’s a film that should have been more consistent in it’s storytelling.

What did you think of Don’t Look Up? Let me know what you think in the comments below!

Don’t Look Up is available to watch on Netflix now!

Categories
Uncategorised

“Got invited to the Christmas party by mistake”: The Rise of the Unconventional Christmas Film

There are many certainties at Christmas. An extensive wish list that is left unfulfilled, copious amounts of mulled wine is consumed and the never-ending debate of “Is Die Hard a Christmas film?” is discussed in a ridiculous amount of detail. The long-endured debate has been discussed by fans, critics, even cast and crew from the blockbuster as they puzzle whether it is a Christmas film filled with action or if it is an action film that just so happens to be set during the festive season. One thing is for sure, it has become one of the most popular flicks to put on during the darker months as we see its inclusion among films such It’s a Wonderful Life and A Christmas Carol (and A Muppet’s Christmas Carol if you’re me). It begs the question: how does a film qualify as a Christmas film? After all, Die Hard isn’t the first Christmas film where the festivities take a back seat. Tim Burton’s Batman Returns is another one often watched and follows a similar trend in that it is action focused. Even the most loved seasonal family films like Home Alone and Gremlins have splashes of Christmas but again the action and plot outweighs the Christmassy elements. However, this doesn’t reduce the Christmassy feeling that these feelings bring and thus begs the question: if a family action film set at Christmas can qualify as a Christmas film, then why can’t an adult action film also fall under the same snowy umbrella? And what about films set at Christmas but don’t revolve around Christmas? Do they qualify also?

A good example of the latter would be Stanley Kubrick’s swansong Eyes Wide Shut (1999). Starring Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman as married couple Bill and Alice who are living the high life in New York City with their daughter, Helena. After Alice reveals her sexual fantasies to Bill, Bill sets off to find his former college friend, Nick, who he had seen earlier that evening. One thing leads to another and Bill ends up decked in a hooded cloak and Venetian mask in an affluent mansion witnessing a mass orgy taking place in every room in the house. The film is famed for this sequence which is one of the intense and terrifying scenes you can encounter in this film, purely because you don’t know anyone except Bill. It doesn’t sound very festive and yet it has become somewhat of an underdog Christmas film due to the festive season timeline and numerous decorated sets. It’s the ultimate anti-Christmas Christmas film. This film brings in the argument that you can have a very adult film, surrounded by Christmas but rejecting the values as we see this family spending the festivities apart from each other – poor Helena is stuck with the babysitter constantly. Kubrick subverts those traditional morals of the festive time and questions the concept of the Christmas film. This film is a visual and literal antithesis of It’s a Wonderful Life. Where It’s a Wonderful Life shows love, family and kindness, Eyes Wide Shut gives sex, language and violence in abundance. The only similarity the two share is that the patriarch is thankful to live and grateful for what he has but the journeys to get there couldn’t be more different.

ews

Where Eyes Wide Shut rejects the morals of Christmas and family values, Todd Haynes’ modern masterpiece Carol does everything it can to uphold them. Set in 1950s New York and following department store sales assistant, Therese Belivet (Rooney Mara). Therese is an aspiring photographer, has a great social life and a boyfriend who wants to marry her and take her to Paris as soon as possible. I have written a fuller review on Carol which you can read here. Everything is wonderful, conventional and seems to have everything you could want in a traditional Christmas film. Where Carol seems to differ is the moment when Therese, geared up with a Santa hat and working her shift glances over and sees a well-dressed woman staring back to her. This woman is Carol Aird (Cate Blanchett) and the moment I just explained can only be described as love at first sight. What subsequently follows is a heart-wrenching story of two women who long to be together in a society that wishes to draw them apart. Carol has become a phenomenon in the LGBT+ film world and with good reason. It is a perfect example of a modern Christmas film. The Christmassy music, the warm colour palette and the natural way Blanchett and Mara portray the blossoming love between the women has all the makings of a classic Christmas film. In fact, I would argue that Carol the perfect example of a modern Christmas film. It keeps those traditions from earlier Christmas films but is subtly progressive at the same time.

Lastly, there are films that give the feeling of Christmas without actually presenting any festive connection. A prime example would be The Wizard of Oz (1939) which has become a regular during Christmastime for many families. The use of dreamy technicolour, traditional family morals and Judy Garland’s voice is the perfect combination for a festive treat that is perfect for those who like Christmas films and those who don’t. It’s the perfect good vs. evil story as Dorothy finds herself from black and white Kansas to the colourful land of Oz. To get back home, she has to defeat the Wicked Witch of the West with the help of the mysterious Wizard. If we are willing to include films like The Wizard of Oz to the roster of Christmas films then does that suggest that it is the tone of the film rather than the setting of the film that qualifies it? The Wizard of Oz certainly argues this. Of course what the film also has in its favour is the decades of Christmas day showing on TV since its release. It has become a staple for many families and their descendants. It would be interesting to see what modern films become the equivalent in the future.

Naturally, it will always come down to individual taste and opinion but it is interesting how the rules differ dependant on the film itself. Whether its the themes, tone or Christmas setting that decides it for you, there is a trend that sees modern films subverting the more traditional festive tropes that you see in classics like Miracle on 34th Street (1947). I think this is in part due to Die Hard sparking this debate as there is an increase in more self-aware Christmas films over the past 30 years. Regardless of whether you think that films like Eyes Wide Shut deserve a place on the list of Christmas films, it looks like unconventionality is here to stay.

Categories
Uncategorised

Top 5 Leonardo DiCaprio Performances

Leonardo DiCaprio is a rare sort of actor nowadays. He is the most profitable outside of those who have worked in superhero franchises and manages to still pull in an audience of all kinds. Beloved since his career-making turn as an autistic teenager in 1993’s What’s Eating Gilbert Grape? DiCaprio has evolved from child star to young heartthrob, playboy to a mature rounded actor who can seemingly master any role he plays. This year saw his second collaboration with renowned director, Quentin Tarantino and it hs propelled him into the race for the Best Actor gongs this awards season.

During a time where his star someone seems to still be on a rise despite being at the top of his game, I thought I’d compile a list of my top 5 performances from DiCaprio. This proved difficult and it’s not to say that anything excluded means that it’s bad, I just didn’t have the space.

Here’s my top 5 in chronological order:

What’s Eating Gilbert Grape? (1993)

The film that brought DiCaprio to worldwide attention and melted the hearts of a global audience, DiCaprio plays Arnie Grape, the younger brother of the titular character (played by Johnny Depp), who acts as his carer. Playing a role such as Arnie is deeply complex and requires much maturity that a lot of actors don’t possess, but DiCaprio shows his dedication to the craft beautifully. Arnie is a hopeful individual who Gilbert thinks the world of. DiCaprio’s performance is tender and layered as we see the character’s frustration rise throughout the film until it explodes. It earned DiCaprio a well-deserved Oscar nomination for Best Supporting Actor (many people even think he should have won). A role such as this would be a good enough highlight for any actor’s resume, but for DiCaprio, this is only the beginning of a blossoming career.

Titanic (1997)

I would be lying if I said this wasn’t my favourite DiCaprio performance. The iconic love story that defines the Hollywood blockbuster and tells the fictional story of two star-crossed lovers on the doomed 1912 liner that sank to the sea after hitting an iceberg. DiCaprio plays Jack Dawson, an artist with a hard-working attitude who wins tickets for the Titanic at a game of poker. He stays in a third-class cabin with his friend Fabrizio (Danny Nucci) and fate hands him a meeting with the beautiful first-class passenger, Rose DeWitt Bukater (Kate Winslet). If What’s Eating GIlbert Grape? was a stroke of luck then Titanic cemented his superstar status. He lost out on a much-deserved Oscar-nomination but he was instantly recognised by fans everywhere. Jack and Rose’s story immediately became synonamous with classic Hollywood and the film is still loved around the world. I can’t even begin to explain how much I love this film. It must be among my most watched films of all time and partly because of the sincerity and heart in DiCaprio’s performance.

The Aviator (2004)

DiCaprio’s first collaboration with Martin Scorsese showed that DiCaprio is more than capable of leading a dramatic feature at top billing. He does so perfectly in this Howard Hughes biopic in his turn as the legendary producer through the high times of his career. DiCaprio won a Golden Globe for his performance and lost out on an Academy Award. The Aviator is an interesting insight into the Golden Age of Hollywood and what people will do to hold onto the power and fame that they have. Even against a strong supporting cast, particularly Cate blanchett in an Oscar-winning turn as Hughes’ love interest, Katharine Hepburn, DiCaprio holds himself with ease. I was torn between this and his more recent Scorsese collaboration, The Wolf of Wall Street but I think that this film bridges the gap between his heartthrob days and his breaking into “serious” acting as he isn’t afraid of allowing him to become immersed in the role.

Django Unchained (2012)

After scheduling conflicts got in the way of him playing Hans Landa in Inglourious Basterds (2009), Quentin Tarantino cast DiCaprio as the evil plantation owner, Calvin Candie who is introduced into the 3 hour film halfway through but manages to make such an impact that it influences the entire film. The film follows former slave, Django (Jamie Foxx) as he and bounty hunter Dr. King Schultz (Christoph Waltz) seek to track down and free Django’s wife, Broomhilda (Kerry Washington) who has been sold to Candie and works at his Candieland plantation. It’s a film that was mired in controversy from the beginning due to its excessive use of racial slur and extreme violence. The hard-hitting parts of the film come from Candie’s treatment of the slaves such as forcing them to partake in “Mandingo fighting” where two black men are forced to fight to the death for their owners’ entertainment. The scene is brutal and hard to watch as Django looks on helplessly as Candie cheers as his man wins. What makes this role so different for DiCaprio is that this role is the first where his character is not lovable in any way. Candie’s evil nature is clear when he has a slave ripped to shreds by dogs in front of Django to show his power as a white man.

Once Upon a Time in Hollywood (2019)

In his second collaboration with Tarantino, DiCaprio is promoted to the leading role as fading actor, Rick Dalton. Once Upon a Time in Hollywood is witty and shows DiCaprio in top form. I have written a full review which you can read here. I wouldn’t be surprised to see DiCaprio’s name filling up nomination spots come awards season as this is a role that he pulls off fantastically as the self-pitying, alcoholic actor.

As I come to the end of this list, I want to give a really special shoutout to his mega turn as Jordan Belfort in martin Scorsese’s 2013 hit, The Wolf of Wall Street. Admittedly, this is the top 5 that my gut went with and it breaks my heart not to include this or his Oscar-winning turn in Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu’s The Revenant but as I said in my introduction, there are so many performances to choose from and they are the five that made the biggest impact on me.

What do you think? What’s your favourite Leonardo DiCaprio performance? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Women’s Voice In Film

Women in film has become a huge talking point for film development in recent years, partially due to the #metoo movement that outed the abusive patriarchy in film seeing women given less power both in representation and finance. A lot of discussion on the internet (from men mostly) questioning whether there truly is a problem in the first place, do the women deserve the harassment they face and most importantly, do we really need these gender swap remakes? The answers to these questions are simply: yes there is a problem, no a woman never deserves harassment and of course we need as much female representation as possible.

It’s not secret that the days of Golden Hollywood, although seemingly flawless and iconic, foresaw the way women in film were treated by their bosses (producers and directors). From the infamous “casting couch” to the manipulative studio contracts, Hollywood presented itself as a mecca of dreams but proved to be a breaking point of mental illness, drug and alcohol misuse and domestic abuse. This period sees the breakdown of many stars including Judy Garland, Marilyn Monroe and Bette Davis just to name a few. It seemed that solace could only be found at the bottom of a whiskey glass.

So what does this issue have to do with Hollywood today?

Well, to begin with, despite the elimination of studio contracts in the 50s due to the collapse of the Hollywood studio structure, it appears that female filmmaking is still viewed as a niche rather than as an equal offering. The fact that we even discuss a film as “female” or celebrate female creators and strong female characters shouldn’t be something we celebrate in the 21st century. Especially considering that we’re at a century of accessible filmmaking that has distributed across the globe. AFter everything that has happened globally regarding women’s issues such as voting rights, reproductive rights, fighting the wage gap, it’s unsurprising that the fight for the female experience through a woman’s perspective has been equally difficult. After all, film is a brilliant and affordable medium to translate issues to a global audience using visuals to gain awareness for issues. Take last year’s Oscar-winning short documentary Period. End of Sentence. that looks at female poverty in India where women are forced to quit school due to periods as they are unablt to afford sanitary products. In terms of fictional feature films, we have seen a resurgence of female driven comedies with Bridesmaids accredited with starting this trend. Other offerings in recent years have reverted back to teenage years with 2019’s Booksmart and 2017’s Lady Bird among the big fish. it’s great to see original stories created by women being given mainstream releases and have subsequently done well in the awards circuit. As well as comedies, we have also seen female-centred dramas such as Todd Haynes’ beautiful and iconic LGBT love story Carol (you can read my review here) starring Cate Blanchett and Rooney Mara, which I would argue is the best love film of the century so far. Now these Indie films do incredibly well, but why hasn’t this translated as well into mainstream films? I’ll try to break this down.

It’s known that the majority of people who will go and see an original story created and performed by women is going to be seen by women. That’s all well and good but considering that men are the majority of the cinematic audience statistically, it’s important to get men to see films created and performed by women too. This is for a number of reasons and since the film industry is a business, the most important issue is money. If more men see the films then more money is given to the filmmakers and then more films created by women can be made which would eventually make the idea of the “female film” as old and traditional as the Golden Age of Hollywood. This brings me to the gender swap remakes. If you looked at the highest grossing films in recent years, chances are that they are filled with sequels, reboots, prequels and remakes. Using this information, it is a smart idea that in order to bring a female perspective to a high-grossing film, you must incorporate strong female roles into these films. However, this hasn’t been without a share of complaints from a small portion of the male audience. Take the Marvel and DC Universes for example. Admittedly, I am not a huge fan of the Marvel Universe but I have never heard such negativity from a male audience regarding it’s iconic female characters before. It seems that every other film is released with no issue, Marvel films particularly tend to sell out every initial screening and exceed in both critic and audience circles so when they decided to do a film dedicated to Captain Marvel, this should have been a celebration for a strong female character to join the achievements of its predecessors; however, this sadly wasn’t the case. A portion of the male audience was outraged by Brie Larson’s interpretation of the role as well as her feminist statements. It’s all well and good when the male superheros want to prove their stereotyped masculinity (which is an old school trope that Marvel appear to be fighting as well by bringing vulnerability into the male characters) but when Captain Marvel doesn’t need a man to save the world and more importantly, doesn’t want a man with her to save the world, this is a major issue. It was a role that should have been celebrated but instead, while Endgame was adored for bringing its emotion to the male characters (Iron Man specifically), Captain Marvel is viewed in a negative light because she veers away from the traditional “eye-candy” trope that Golden Hollywood has been feeding the audience with for years. I hope that as these franchises expand and more female characters are incorporated into their respected universes, the male audience that openly despises the likes of Captain Marvel and Wonder Woman may be open to the idea of the strong, independent women without thinking of them as simple love interests or sidekicks rather than the leaders of their own stories. Despite this small male audience who tweet outrageously about the femalecentred films, DC is clearly proud of the overwhelming success of Wonder Woman as they are bringing Patty Jenkins back for the second film (I did actually enjoy Wonder Woman! The first segment featuring the Amazonians is astonishing direction and writing).

I am not writing this article to be negative or bash the male audience because the male audience is important to the plight of female filmmaking as well and it is only a small portion. I think that there has to be an understanding that it is much harder for a woman to get a film made than a man. Once that statement is understood and acknowledged then the discussion of female film becomes a welcome idea and celebrated. But in a world where the Indie films created by women are renowned for their originality, why do we need gender swapped films such as Ghostbusters? Do we actually need them?

As I said at the top of this article… yes, yes we do!

Why do we need them? By remaking films with gender swapped protagonists, it gives the audience a new perspective on a femiliar setting. It’s easy to be angered when a classic like Ghostbusters is given an update with the best female comedians much like the original with men. It’s a brilliant film by itself (it obviously isn’t as good as the original) but I don’t think the intention was to “outdo” the original. I think it was to show that women could be given an ordinary role without the woman part being of any importance. I think that if Ghostbusters was remade with a male cast, there would be the usual complaints of “we don’t need a remake” but the abuse hurled at the stars of the film showed that there is sexist view from this portion of male audience. It seems to not only be that women have “taken” the roles, but that women are put in powerful positions without being the love interest. There is also an argument that representation is important and when given the opportunity to make these remakes, it’s another opportunity to put women in the driving seat which is only a positive.

Some of the films I love such as Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and Frances Ha feature brilliant female characters. Clementine Kruczynski (played fantastically by Kate Winslet) in the former and Greta Gerwig as the quirky titular character in the latter are women who have their flaws and struggles but at the end of the day, are independent and strong. Both films directed by men but show the important of strong female presence in film. Eternal Sunshine’s script won the Best Original Screenplay Academy Award suggesting that there is a demand for these female characters. Another film that is a force of nature is 2016’s Turkish offering, Mustang, about five young sisters who are forced into marriage after wrongly being accused of sexual activity with a group of boys in their class at school. Written and directed by Deniz Gamze Erguven in her directorial debut, Mustang is one of the best films I have ever seen. The film is shown through the eyes of the youngest sister, Lale, giving the audience an innocent glimpse into an oppressive world without explicitly saying so. Much like the message of the film, the writing and directing is subtle with a lot of stillness and peace in moments of chaos. Another brilliant female-led offering is 2018’s The Favourite which was hugely snubbed in the Oscars this year and has not one, not two but THREE stellar leads in the form of Olivia Colman as Queen Anne (who deservedly won an Oscar for her performance) and Rachel Weisz and Emma Stone as the women vying for the queen’s attention. It’s a complex triangle of lust, power and manipulation. This answers the question whether women can carry a film with a resounding YES!

At the end of it all, more needs to be done to finance and distribute mainstream films created by and starring women but this isn’t to say that none exist at all and the offerings we have had in recent years particularly show a huge improvement to the films of the Golden Era. Women have proven time and time again that they can create films that are both critical and commercial (when given the chance) successes.

What are your favourite films created by and/or starring women? Let me know in the comments below?

Categories
Uncategorised

Carol (2015)

One of the best films of the 21st century so far and a defining mark of LGBT+ cinema, Todd Haynes’ Carol is a film swimming in emotion as it explores the realities of a lesbian relationship in the 1950s. Adapted by Phyllis Nagy from Patricia Highsmith’s controversial novel The Price of Salt, Carol tells the story of Therese Bellevet (Rooney Mara), a young twenty-something trying to find her way in 1950s New York. Whilst working as a Christmas temp in a busy department store, Therese has a love at first sight encounter with Carol (Cate Blanchett), an older soon-to-be divorcee who is a darling to New York society. Much like the Christmas backdrop, the film is a present revealing more layers with every watch.

Haynes pulls out all of the stops for this production, playing all of his cards as a visionary. He managed to take the words on the page and create a universe that seems to belong to Carol and Therese. From the costumes by Sandy Powell to the music by Carter Burwell, the film is orchestrated by a beauty that stays throughout the film. What made the novel so controversial on release was its happy ending which was unheard of for stories regarding homosexuality and Haynes wanted to keep that. He wants the audience to know that this is their world and it is a beautiful one. The film appears traditional on the surface and yet groundbreaking in subtext. I think it is a huge mark in LGBT filmmaking.

The script by Phyllis Nagy is nothing short of phenomenal and is brilliantly faithful to the book. The changes that are made from the book are minimal but also crucial as I think the right choices were made to tell this story onscreen. My favourite scene in the film is when Therese agrees to go to lunch with Carol and the two get to know each other. It is natural and intimate with the sexual tension cutting through the undertones. Nagy makes every word linger and makes sure that no line is wasted. The film is fantastically paced, feeling like a slow train chugging forwards towards the inevitable climax that causes their bubble to burst. The sharp focus on the women themselves makes their love appear literally timeless, as if the world around them doesn’t matter. When the outside world does interfere and threaten them, it is done so that the audience is jolted back into reality from the dream that the women’s relationship had given.

Cate Blanchett’s performance as the titular character is glamorous to look at but tinged with the pain that has fallen on her and her family as her relationship with her husband, Harge (Kyle Chandler) has broken down. Carol has been known for her relationships with women, namely her best friend Abby (Sarah Paulson), who has remained a constant in her life after their romance ended. Blanchett takes control of the screen and is so captivating with every glance and word. There is an inevitable sadness that surrounds Carol even as she embarks on her love affair with Therese as she knows that the chances of their relationship surviving against the 1950s society isn’t likely. Her maturity and knowledge of the world allows her to be a mentor of sorts towards Therese as she knows how she is feeling.

Rooney Mara’s performance as Therese is the audience’s way into the events of the film as hers is the primary perspective throughout the film save for one or two scenes regarding the custody of Carol’s young daughter. Mara won the Best Actress Award at Cannes Film Festival and it’s easy to see where. Therese is at a very conflicting time in her life. Where Carol is assured and secure in her own sexuality, Therese doesn’t quite know what she wants or even understand her feelings at first. As the film unfolds, Therese becomes more confident and independent, breaking off her relationship with partner, Richard and focuses on her career and blossoming relationship with Carol.

Overall, I really recommend you check Carol out if you haven’t seen it. I can’t count how many times I have watched it despite it only being a few years old but I always found something new to focus on whether that is the score or set design. A film that was sorely overlooked by the Academy when it came to the Oscars, Carol will no doubt be a film that critics and film buffs will be looking back on fondly.

What did you think of Carol? Let me know what you think in the comments below!