Tag: awards

Categories
Uncategorised

Steve McQueen: Film Ranking

One of the most revolutionary film directors to emerge this century so far is Steve McQueen. A Turner Prize winning artist who has turned his attention to feature films, McQueen’s realistic and fearless approach to exploring serious topics such as domestic abuse and slavery as well as taboo subjects such as sex addiction. When it comes to mcQueen, nothing is off limits and he isn’t afraid to expose the realities of the film’s subjects. He is also the first black filmmaker to win the Acaemy Award for Best Picture for 12 Years a Slave. I also think he should have been rewarded the Best Director Oscar as well although Alfonso Cuarón did a great job with Gravity.

Given the current landscape, I think it is now more important than ever to highlight the talent and calibre that people of colour bring to the film industry. The film industry is so important when it comes to representation and sadly, it just isn’t where it should be. Film is a fantastic medium to express personal stories, provide escapism and bring relevant topics and subjects to the forefront as point of discussion. I thought it best to take a look into McQueen’s amazing filmography and do a ranking of his films. There are only four films but each one is a standout in their own right so as usual, it will prove to be a challenge.

Here are my mini reviews for each McQueen film follows by the ranking:

Hunger (2008)
McQueen’s feature debut stars Michael Fassbender as IRA protestor, Bobby Sands, who takes part in a hunger and no-wash strike. This is a fantastic debut for McQueen and deservedly won him a BAFTA for Special Achievement by a British Director, Writer or Producer for their First Feature Film. We watch as Sands figuratively and literally begins to fade away as he becomes the symbol for the strike. McQueen doesn’t hide the dirtiness and the discomfort in watching Sands lose the majority of his weight to the point where he can’t function. Technically, the film appears simple but it is comprised of many brilliant shots, one in particular being a 17 minute non-stop conversation between Sands and Father Moran (Liam Cunningham). By bringing a minimalist and realistic angle to the film, it actually exemplifies the horrors of the strike. Hunger put both McQueen and Fassbender on the map and it made way for the former’s unapologetic point of view approach to filmmaking.

Shame (2011)
For his second feature, McQueen reunites with Fassbender who plays Brandon Sulliven, a business executive who has an addiction to sex. Much like Hunger, McQueen does not flinch away from the realities that sex addiction has. There is nudity, both male and female, in abundance as well as underlying issues of family conflict and self-harm. This is not a film to be watched lightly as it is even more uncomfortable than its predecessor but it talks about a topic that people consider taboo. It also explores classism and the idea of the untouchable rich white male. During his usual work day, Brandon religiously watched pornography on his computer and when this is discovered, it is automatically assumed that his intern is the one who has been downloading and watching it. The idea that someone like Brandon couldn’t be associated with sex addiction is an idea that McQueen rejects in Shame. Brandon surrounds himself with sex to avoid the fact that he is lonely and unfulfilled.

12 Years a Slave (2013)
The film that propelled McQueen to the major awards circuit, 12 Years a Slave is possibly the most explicit and “real” feature film about slavery in mainstream cinema. Based on the memoir of the name same by Solomon Northup, a New-york born black man who was kidnapped and sold as a slave in Louisiana. Northup is played by Chiwetel Ejiofor with Lupita Nyongo’o as fellow slave Patsey and Fassbender in his third McQueen film as slave owner Edwin Epps. It’s a star-studded cast but what McQueen does so well is focus so much on the characters and their development that the audience forgets which actors they are watching and it becomes almost documentary like. McQueen does not hold back on the brutality that the slaves face and it goes beyond daily beatings as we see Epps rape Patsey and Epps’ wife feel resentment for Patsey rather than her husband. It’s a film that demands conversation and McQueen refuses to allow the film to be whitewashed or edited to appeal to white audiences in the way that films such as Song of the South does.

Widows (2018)
The latest feature film released by McQueen is an amazing tour de force starring Viola Davis as Veronica, a woman recently widowed after her bank robber husband, Harry (Liam Neeson) and his cohorts are killed when their car blows up. Veronica along with the other widows of the men who died must work together to get some money that is owed to a crime boss. The team comprises of Veronica, Linda (Michelle Rodriguez), Alice (Elizabeth Debicki) and Belle (Cynthia Erivo) and it’s so empowering watching such a huge film led by women and more importantly such a diverse cast of women. Anyone who claims that women cannot lead a film because it doesn’t bring in money is mistaken as the film was a critical and commercial success. What makes the film so engaging is how well-rounded each of the women are. We get a grip of their backgrounds in a few scenes and yet the audience understands their story and motivations to get the money. Even when Belle, who wasn’t one of the original widows is brought into the plot, is introduced, her backstory as both a beautician and babysitter is made clear highlighting her struggling financial position.

Although it is not the longest filmography, McQueen has proven why he is one of the most exciting filmmakers working today. I have included discussions of each of the films above when talking about Michael Fassbender and Viola Davis’ best roles which you can read here and here, respectively. I think that only demonstrates McQueen’s talent as director that he is able to create career-best films for his stars. His ability to create characters that are well-rounded is flawless and he has only demonstrated improvement as we go from a single standout performance in Hunger to four equally developed characters in Widows where he allows women to take the lead.

Here is my ranking of McQueen’s film:

1) 12 Years a Slave (2013)

2) Widows (2018)

3) Hunger (2008)

4) Shame (2011)

Do you agree with my ranking? Which McQueen film is your favourite? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Top 5 Jim Carrey Performances

Jim Carrey is an actor who time and time again demonstrates the range that he has, despite his solidified reputation as a brilliant comedian. He has been playing leading roles since his meteoric rise to fame in the 90s that have become classics such as Ace Ventura and The Mask. There is a reason why he was Hollywood’s highest paid actor at one point, he has such charisma that his films are incredibly fun to watch. It is unbelievable to think that he has never been nominated for an Academy Award despite winning two Golden Globes and showing that he is capable of pulling off performances that are memorable and impactful.

Carrey was one of my favourite actors growing up. I loved watching his films thanks to his larger than life characters and his hilarious physical comedy, particularly his dramatic expressions. What has been wonderful about Carrey’s career is seeing him evolve and taking part in a variety of differing roles from his mid-90s expressive comedy to his more serious roles in the late 90s and early 2000s. Like marmite, people tend to either love or hate Carrey’s work and I am definitely in the former.

Here are my top 5 Jim Carrey performances in chronological order:

Ace Ventura: When Nature Calls (1995)

One of those rare instances where I enjoy the sequel much more than the original, Carrey reprises his role as the titular pet detective which sees Ventura recruited for a mission to retrieve a rare white bat that belongs to the native Wachati tribe. The film is an explosion of signature Carrey jokes and the film is my personal highlight of the mid-90s period where Carrey was all the rage. His unpredictability still remains the main point of attention for audiences as we watch him knock out a man and wear him on his shoulders to make a point on the fur trade as well as numerous musical moments including a hilarious rendition of “Chitty Chitty Bang Bang”. My personal highlight, however, is the seen in which he encounters the bats for the first time bringing us great lines such as “take that, you winged spawn of Satan” and “die, devil bird”. His filmography at thie point in his career wasn’t for everyone as it is so over the top but personally, I love it and it’s interesting watching this film back and watching it from an animal rights point of view.

The Truman Show (1998)

The film that showed an entirely different side to Carrey’s range, The Truman Show sees Carrey play Truman, a man who believes he is living a regular suburban life when in fact it is a reality show filled with actors that is broadcast to the world. Truman begins to suspect that something isn’t quite right and tries to escape the edge of his town where he hasn’t been before. It’s a poignant film about identity and finding that sense of belonging. Truman’s life has always unknowingly been synonomous with a global audience who share his journey. Truman has always been controlled by the show’s creator, Christoph (Ed Harris) who acts like the puppet master. He adds in drama and conflict if Truman’s life is going swimmingly. Carrey’s performance is a true tour de force thanks to his naive and subtle approach to the role. He is able to detract from the typecast view that he has created in his filmography thus far. It is because of his ability to switch between ranges so well that won him a Golden Globe for his troubles.

Man on the Moon (1999)

Following on from his critical and commercial success as Truman in The Truman Show, Carrey knocks it out of the park again in this biopic that seems him play Andy Kaufman, a man who redefined comedy in the 1970s. This film sees Carrey join forces with the brillint director Milos Forman and gives him the chance to show that The Truman Show performance wasn’t a stroke of luck. His portrayal of Kaufman is fantastic as we follow his rise in comedy and his stints on Saturday Night Live as well as the TV show Taxi which he starred in. The film overall isn’t the best but usually biopics allow for the actor portraying the subject to really standout as Carrey does here. He is the major draw and highlight but this isn’t a bad thing because he has such command on the role. Also hearing how he stayed in character offset shows his commitment and dedication to getting his performance right shows that he does take his roles seriously. His impersonation strikes the right tone, it is never over the top in classic Jim Carrey style and eventually the audience forgets that we are watching an actor rather than Kaufman himself.

Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004)

My favourite Jim Carrey performance comes in the form of this career-defining film following Joel (Carrey), a man unhappy with his life who finds out that his ex-girlfriend Clementine (Kate Winslet) has had her memory wiped off him by the mysterious Lacuna Incorporated and shows him undergoing the same treatment to get rid of his memories of Clementine. Charlie Kaufman’s script is fantastic and won him a well-deserved Oscar that has redefined original screenplay writing in the 21st century. The concept is so bizarre and yet the humour is subdued within a darker context making way for the film to focus on the drama within Joel and Clementine’s relationship. Carrey’s performance should have garnered him an Academy Award nomination but sadly it wasn’t to be. His portrayal of Joel is tinged with sadness throughout. The idea of not being with Clementine initially to the realisation that he will lose all memories of her while he is being forced to relive the memories during his procedure. It’s a heartbreaking film about the breakdown of a relationship and is made real by the strength of Carrey and WInslet’s performance.

Lemony Snicket’s A Series of Unfortunate Events (2004)

2004 was a resounding success for Carrey who made an unforgettable appearance in this popular adaptation of the best-selling series of the same name. Playing the villainous Count Olaf, Carrey channels his signature overtly expressive humour as his figuratively and literally towers over the three bauldelaire orphans who are subject to his care after the tragic death of their parents. The film is littered with stars including Joan Cusack, Timothy Spall and Meryl Streep but it is Carrey who shines the most. His performance was exactly how I envisioned Count Olaf would be when reading the books. The film overall strikes a completely different tone but Carrey’s performance is overly dramatic, unapologetically obnoxious and loud but most importantly, he has charisma which is crucial for the role. The film does have its flaws but Carrey’s performance is definitely not one. He is clearly having fun being in such a menacing role and it makes the film enjoyable to watch.

There are so many performances that could have been included in this list such as How the Grinch Stole Christmas (2000) and Bruce Almighty (2003) but I think that the films I have listed above really demonstrate Carrey at his best. Although he hasn’t done many major roles in recent years, i hope he does make a comeback because it’ll be interesting to see what kinds of roles he would take on.

Do you agree with the films I have picked? Which Jim Carrey performance and/or film is your favourite? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Hayao Miyazaki: Film Ranking

It’s hard not to think about Hayao Miyazaki when choosing what anime film to watch. Known as one of the founders of the Japanese animation powerhouse Studio Ghibli, Miyazaki has established a name among critics and audiences alike as an important figure in helping Japanese cinema reach a global audience with films that are suitable for all ages. So far, Studio Ghibli has only won one film in the Best Animated Feature category which is for Miyazaki’s masterpiece Spirited Away (2001) which, in my opinion, remains the best overall winner in this category. I do think there are times when a Ghibli production should have walked away with the award but sadly, releases directly from Disney Studios tend to dominate the category almost every year.

Ghibli is reliable and consistent, bringing out films that challenge our perceptions on the society we live in by incorporating more mature issues such as loss, mankind’s treatment of nature and identity. There are other directors who have also helped to bring Ghibli the reputation it has today such as Isao Takahata who I will also be writing a separate ranking for but in the meantime, let’s delve into the films of the one and only Hayao Miyazaki.

Here is a mini write up for each in chronological order followed by my ranking at the end of the article:

The Castle of Cagliostro (1979)

Miyazaki’s debut comes in the form of this action packed adventure based on the Lupin III manga series following thief Lupin and his partner Jigen after they successfully rob the Monte Carlo Casino only to find that the money is counterfeit. They travel to Cagliostro, the rumoured source of the counterfeit enterprise in a bid to put an end to the ordeal. The film is credited with being an inspiration to the likes of Raiders of the Lost Ark and The Great Mouse Detective. It’s clearly not completely controlled by Miyazaki himself as it was made before Ghibli’s inception but there are some signature Miyazaki traits that are noticable in hindsight such as the exaggerated expressions and the mix of humour and drama. It’s a faster-paced film than the usual Miyazaki action films but it doesn’t feel rushed. Lupin is a great character and the writing ensures the audience is gripped. Another highlight in this film is the score by Yuji Ohno which has Pink Panther vibes and really helps to elevate the film-watching experience. I think that this film marks a very strong start to what was evidently the beginning of one of the most exciting film careers in Japanese cinema history.

Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind (1984)

The first film created by the founders of Studio Ghibli comes in the form of this brilliant dystopic epic set in a world where the Toxic Jungle, a forest filled with giant, poisonous insects threatens to eliminate the last of the human race. Though released before Ghibli was officially founded, Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind is commonly considered a Ghibli and has been re-released under the Ghibli banner. The film follows the titular character as she strives to find a way for the insects and humans to co-exist. Based on the manga series of the same name by Miyazaki, who also adapted it into a screenplay, Nausicaä isn’t afraid to delve into deep issues and question its younger audience. Focusing on the themes of mankind vs nature which would prove to be an underlying topic in subsequent Miyazaki features, the film is also unafraid to showcase loss and fractured relationships. It’s also refreshing to see a female protagonist whose strength is never questioned and is accepted for what it is, another trait that Miyazaki showcases in each of his Ghibli produced films.

Castle in the Sky (1986)

The first official feature to be released under the Studio Ghibli is the action-adventure Castle in the Sky. The film follows Pazu, a young boy who works in the mine of his local village who comes across a girl, Sheeta, who floats down from the sky. They are soon chased by pirates and government agents in a bid to track down the secret locating the mysterious floating island, Laputa, that Sheeta may hold the key to find. I have written a fuller review on this film that you can read here but it is truly a dazzling achievement. The scope and detail in the animation is remarkable and the score by Joe Hisaishi feels timeless. Although it is not as popular as Miyazaki’s later films, I think that Castle in the Sky is such a thrilling and impactful film that has a lot to say on mankind’s relationship with nature, the importance of the environment and people’s relationships with each other. Both protagonists work together to find a peaceful solution against the people who want to use Laputa and its materials for weaponary and world domination.

My Neighbor Totoro (1988)

Arguably the most iconic Studio Ghibli film, My Neighbor Totoro follows sisters Mei and Satsuki as they move into an old house with their father so they can be closer to their mother who is recovering in hospital from a long-term illness. The two girls eventually encounter an array of spirits, including one that lives in the nearby forest who Mei names Totoro and the enigmatic Catbus that provides transport for the spirits. It’s a wonderful film that provides the perfect introduction for younger children to Studio Ghibli. Unlike its predecessors, My Neighbor Totoro is a lot more innocent and childlike in its design and message. This doesn’t prevent it from being a brilliant film, however, as it does a great job on touching on family dynamics, childhood and loss. It has a lighter feel and very striking design, particularly the Catbus who conveys the tone of the film without even saying anything. What is brilliant about Miyazaki’s world is how he integrates traditional Japanese folklore with his own imagination and artistry and My Neighbor Totoro is a beautiful example of this.

Kiki’s Delivery Service (1989)

Following on his successful streak, Miyazaki brings another film geared towards younger children in this lovely tale about a younger witch, Kiki, who sets off to find out what she wants to do with her life. Accompanied by her cat Jiji, Kiki is fascinated by the normal human world and understandably finds it hard to fit in as she is not like them. The film is all about understanding accepting our differences and how we can use them to the our advantage. Kiki is a great protagonist for the younger demographic as she is a strong female who is flawed but she works on those flaws. She is a well-rounded character and it showcases Miyazaki’s strength in being able to create characters that audiences of all age can relate to on some level. It’s not the strongest installment in Miyazaki’s filmography but that doesn’t mean it is a bad film at all. Miyazaki’s work is of such high calibre that it just misses out on the top tier of films for me but it is still an absolute joy to watch.

Porco Rosso (1992)

The last film Miyazaki to be made before he took his first hiatus is a more detailed look into the filmmakers interest with aircraft. Porco Rosso follows the titular character who was a human but was cursed and is now a pig who works as a pilot bounty hunter who catches pirates in the Adriatic Sea. It’s a fun-filled adventure that has inklings of Castle in the Sky with the over the top pirates and allows Miyazaki to go deep on his own family heritage of working in aircraft. Joe Hisaishi’s score is fantastic as always and strikes the right upbeat tone that the film has. For me the film’s highlight comes in the scene in which Rosso sees his dead friends flying in the sky in his own version of heaven. It’s a fantastic scene that lifts the whole standard of the film. It is my least favourite Miyazaki film as it does have some flaws that I cannot overlook particularly the treatment of Fio, a teenage woman who aspires to engineer and make planes. A few jokes and quips made by the pirates are thrown her way that I feel are inappropriate for the younger audience. Fio herself is strongly written and is a brilliantly resilient young woman who is unfazed by working in a strongly male-dominated industry but the comments made by other characters could have been removed and still maintain the toxic masculine environment that Miyazaki was wanting to portray.

Princess Mononoke (1997)

Miyazaki returned after 5 years to make this brilliant epic based on traditional Japanese folklore and spirits. Princess Mononoke is fable on mankind’s takeover of nature and the subsequent consequences that this has. Following Eastern Prince Ashitaka who is cursed by a giant boar god who he kills, he must venture West to Irontown, a place filled with revolutionary industrial technology that threatens to takeover the forest by mining the sources underground. On arrival, he comes across San, a human girl raised by the Wolf gods who violently attacks and attempts to kill the leader of Irontown, Lady Eboshi, any chance she can. The film is by far Miyazaki’s most violent and graphic film thanks to its abundance of blood and graphic injury from the offset. Miyazaki always has a large scope in his imagination but Princess Mononoke has such a richness in detail that I think brings it to another tier. From the larger than life forest spirits to Joe Hisaishi’s spectacular score which is my favourite soundtrack from any Studio Ghibli film. I have written a longer review that you can read here. Despite its Medieval Japanese setting, there is a timelessness in the message that Miyazaki it wanting to convey and I think that that is why it resonates with so many people.

Spirited Away (2001)

The film that finally gave Miyazaki a long-awaited Oscar, Spirited Away is usaully the go-to film that beginners to Ghibli go for and with good reason. Following Chihiro, a young girl forced to move away with her parents and is sad to leave her friends, Spirited Away sees the family accidentally trespass on the land of the spirits. After her parents are turned into pigs, Chihiro must work in the Bathhouse while she figures out a way to get her parents back and return home. This film is nothing short of a masterpiece between the wide array of memorable characters as we venture in the spirit world including Haku, a young man who befriends Chihiro and No-Face, a mysterious spirit who suddenly appears and causes mayhem. Everything about it is iconic and it really is a beautiful film to watch. I have done a longer review which you can read here but words really don’t do this film justice.

Howl’s Moving Castle (2004)

Probably the most accessible Miyazaki film storywise, Howl’s Moving Castle is based on the best-selling book by Diana Wynn Jones and follows SOphie, a young woman discontent with her appearance who is cursed by the Witch of the Waste and turned into an old woman. She is then picked up by the mysterious Moving Castle and agrees to work as a cleaning lady for wizard Howl. The film is gloriously magical and is filled with whimiscal design which has made it a favourite amongst fans. The Wales-inspired landscapes are beautiful and vast and some maintain a very high level of detail that remains captivating long after the first viewing. This world that Sophie lives in differs to that of Howl, who longs for beauty and perfection in a world ridden with darkness and chaos. He refuses to take part in the war that is tearing the country apart and provides a bleak backdrop to the natural beauty where the story takes place. Hisaishi’s score is wonderful as always with the main theme waltz reminiscent of a merry-go-round piece. What Miyazaki does so well that he incorporates into this film particularly is showing how blurred the lines are between good and evil.

Ponyo (2008)

After his second hiatus, Miyazaki returns with another film geared towards the younger audience that follows Brunhilde, a goldfish who lives in the sea with her father and sisters, who escapes and is captured in a glass jar by a young human boy called Sōsuke. Brunhilde develops a desire to become human and changes her name to Ponyo after she is accidentally fed blood after Sōsuke shatters the jar which cuts him. Based on The Little Mermaid by Hans Christian Anderson, Ponyo is a less traditional retelling of the fairytale but still maintains Miyazaki’s vision and charm irregardless. It is an adorable film about friendship and love and despite there being hints towards a negative shift in the balance of nature due to Ponyo’s wishes, it still remains upbeat. Despite her young age, Ponyo is a strong-willed character who knows that she is out of place at the start but doesn’t understand why and makes it her mission to discover where she belongs.

The Wind Rises (2013)

The lastest Miyazaki feature to be released is absolutely astounding and comes in the form of The Wind Rises, which follows protagonist Jiro Horikoshi, an aircraft designer who works for Mitsubishi during World War II. Based on the manga by Miyazaki, it clearly is a project that the director is passionate about and I think this is emphasised by his realistic approach and design. The film tells the story of an aspiring pilot who eventually becomes an aircraft designer due to his poor eyesight and shows him falling in love with a young woman he meets. The Wind Rises is absolutely beautiful and everything about it from its writing and character design to the score by Hisaishi is flawless. Like most of the other Studio Ghibli films released since the inception of the Best Animated feature Award at the Oscars, this was nominated and it expectedly lost to Frozen but I personally would have given my note to this film because the passion that is conveyed goes beyond Miyazaki’s previous projects.

Unlike a lot of directors, there aren’t as many films that Miyazaki has directed in his 40 year career but that is because creating his films is time-consuming due to his insistence that they stick to hand-drawing their images. In the last 3 years, only 36 minutes have been created for his next feature How Do You Live? which Miyazaki has advised is his last film before retiring for the third (or fourth?) time. The calibre of his films is so high so even the ones that rank a bit lower are so strong in quality. Miyazaki has a reputation that many film-makers and lovers dream of and I have seen these films multiple times and will undoubtedly watch them again and again.

Anywho, here is my final ranking:

1) Castle in the Sky (1986)

2) The Wind Rises (2013)

3) Princess Mononoke (1997)

4) Spirited Away (2001)

5) Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind (1984)

6) Howl’s Moving Castle (2004)

7) Ponyo (2010)

8) My Neighbor Totoro (1988)

9) The Castle of Cagliostro (1979)

10) Kiki’s Delivery Service (1989)

11) Porco Rosso (1992)

So there we have it! What do you think of my list? Which Miyazaki film is your favourite? Let me know in the comments below!

 

Categories
Uncategorised

Top 5 Michael Fassbender Performances

One of the best actors working today without a doubt is Michael Fassbender. Born in Germany and raised in Ireland, Fassbender’s career has gone strength to strength showcasing his range from small-budget indies to massive blockbuster franchises. Garnering critical and commercial acclaim winning a slew of awards including the Venice Film Festival’s Volpi Cup for Best Actor (for Shame) as well as two Academy Award nominations for Best Actor in a Leading Role and Best Actor in a Supporting Role (for Steve Jobs and 12 Years a Slave, respectively). Fassbender never fails to push the bar and standout in whatever film he is. He has worked with a variety of huge directors such as Steve McQueen, Quentin Tarantino, Ridley Scott and Danny Boyle to name a few and is currently working on Taika Waititi’s new film Next Goal Wins.

There are so many performances that I could list but I managed to compile a list of my top favourite performances which I think are the best of the best. Hopefully if anything, this list will demonstrate the range that Fassbender displays from an Irish activist on a hunger strike to an English soldier in World War II to an American billionaire. He has really established himself as one of the most exciting method actors working in Hollywood today.

Without further ado, here are my top 5 Michael Fassbender performances in chronological order:

Hunger (2008)

The role that catapulted Fassbender to the A List is not one to be overlooked. The first collaboration between Fassbender and  Steve McQueen already shows the fearlessness that they both have in their filmmaking and the roles that Fassbender chooses to take on. Fassbender plays IRA member Bobby Sands who takes part in a hunger strike for 66 days and also participates in a no-wash strike. The film also marks McQueen’s feature debut and won him the Camera d’Or at Cannes Film Festival. McQueen’s minimalist direction combined with a character driven script includes an incredible 17 minute shot in which Bobby is challenged to end his protest by Father Moran (Liam Cunningham). What Fassbender does so well in this film and his subsequent performances is his ability to pull off performances that are memorable but not over the top. What Hunger does is allow the focus to be on the performances of the actors because the film doesn’t have bells and whistles and special effects. Fassbender’s performance earned him a British Independent Film Award for Best Leading Actor and it’s easy to see why. His preparation for the role is evident in his dramatic weightloss pre-production. Hunger proves to be a great start when looking at the filmography for Fassbender as it shows his willingness to pick good roles and his dedication to method acting.  

Inglourious Basterds (2009)

Following his stellar lead in Hunger, Fassbender starred in Quentin Tarantino’s fantastic revenge thriller Inglourious Basterds which is a fictional retelling of Nazi-occupied France during the peak of the War. The cast is led by Brad Pitt as Aldo Raine, the leader of the Basterds and stars Christoph Waltz in an Oscar-winning dazzling supporting turn as SS Officer Hans Landa, the latter of which was the major talking point for critics and audiences alike and with good reason. ANother brilliant aspect that comes from this film is Michael Fassbender’s small role as Leiutenant Archie Hicox, an English soldier drafted to France to assist the Basterds with their plan. His role is only short-lived in the film but what he lacks in screentime, he makes up for with charisma. Fassbender is memorable as the quick-witted soldier as he struggles to fit in with the others who are hellbent on revenge. The scene in the underground bar remains one of the best Tarantino moments and it’s largely thanks to Fassbender’s control of the character. As expected in a Tarantino film, the characters are larger than life and it’s clear that Fassbender is enjoying playing Hicox. As mentioned before, this is only a small role but it is a rewarding point in Fassbender’s career as it shows he can standout in a star-studded cast.

Shame (2011)

Fassbender’s second collaboration with Steve McQueen is a deeply explicit look at sex addiction. Fassbender plays Brandon, a high-living bachelor living in New York who is constantly having sex with prostitutes and masturbating in his workplace where he holds an Executive position. Brandon’s addiction is initially his lifestyle. Just like any other addiction, he is subconsciously engaging with sex in any way he can. The film documents the downward spiral Brandon experiences as his lifestyle begins to fall apart with the arrival of his self-harming sister, Sissy (Carey Mulligan) who stays at Brandon’s apartment as she has a few gigs as a lounge singer in the City. Sissy is openly lonely and upset, longing to bridge the broken relationship with her brother who has deluded himself into believing that he is not alone because he is constantly engaging with sex in some way or other. It is the slow-burning realisation that he is alone and that he is incapable of forming “real” connections that make way for Brandon’s downfall. The film earned an NC-17 rating in the US thanks to its explicit scenes which includes Fassbender appearing full-frontal. In an industry where full female nudity has become normalised, there is still a stigma around showing full male nudity. This role is understandably challenging and uncomfortable but Fassbender gives everything to the film. Brandon is deeply flawed and is looking for the puzzle piece that is missing in his life. Fassbender won a second British Independent FIlm Award for Best Lead Actor for his performance. It’s not the lightest film to watch by any means but it is an unafraid look into a common topic that is taboo in a very realist way.

12 Years a Slave (2013)

The third and (to date) latest collaboration between Fassbender and Steve McQueen is an adaptation of the memoir of the same name by Solomon Northup, a New York-born man who is kidnapped and sold into slavery in Louisiana in 1841. Featuring Chiwetel Ejiofor as Northup, Fassbender portrays plantation owner Edwin Epps, a despicable and inhumane person who takes pleasure in beating and raping the slaves who work for him. Fassbender is truly terrifying as Epps and the performance gives goosebumps due to his unpredictability. The scene in which he demands Northup whip Patsey (Lupita Nyong’o) and then proceeds to violently do so himself to a point where she almost dies is horrific to watch and shows a fearlessness in Fassbender’s performance. He is clearly not afraid to go the extra mile and show Epp’s evilness while keeping complete control of the character. This performance shows a different side to Fassbender’s range that we have not seen before, even in his previous antagonist roles. Epps is a man void of compassion and embodies evil incarnate. Thanks to McQueen realist and relentless direction, Fassbender successfully shows this and really gets under the skin of the character and presents this to the audience in a way that no filmmaker has done before. Everyone in the cast does justice to Northup’s story, especially Ejiofor, Nyongo’o and Fassbender, garnering awards attention for each. Fassbender was nominated for his first Academy Award for Best Actor in a Supporting Role.

Steve Jobs (2015)

My favourite Fassbender performances sees him take on the titular character in this Danny Boyle biopic. Fassbender practically becomes the Apple CEO and co-founder as we follow Job’s life from the launch of the Mac that lead to his firing ending with the launch of the iMac which is seen as his Apple comeback. It is such a subtle masterclass of acting that you forget that you are watching an actor. He perfects the accent, the mannerisms and manages to create a deeply complex character that allows the audience to form their on opinions on the man. Aaron Sorkin’s script is a brilliant foundation that Fassbender takes and adds that extra dimension to the film. It is his command of the screen that constantly grabs the audience’s attention and elevates the film to something more than a biopic. The film also features a strong supporting cast led by Kate Winslet, Seth Rogan and Michael Stuhlbarg but it is Fassbender’s lead turn that will leave a lasting imprint long after the film’s ended. The scene in which Jobs and Steve Wozniak (Rogan) argue whether the former should acknowledge the Apple II team in his speech at both computer launches. Jobs is clearly a highly intelligent man but his stubborness and pride hinders him and makes him appear alien and detached from those around him. Fassbender was deservedly nominated for the whole round of major awards and, in my opinion, I think he should have won because the performance is top tier. However, this was the year that Leonardo DiCaprio won all of the awards for his brilliant turn in The Revenant which made the competition one of very high standards.

It’s clear that Fassbender thrives in an environment where he is given challenging and different material. He clearly is wanting to consistently show more range and depth by starring in different genres and working with varying directors and budgets. He is an actor who wants to challenge topical taboos and portray characters who bring discussions among critics and audiences alike. I know that there are tons of performances I could have included such as his performance as Connor in Fish Tank, Magneto in the rebooted X-Men franchise and the titular role in Frank but each of the films I listed are the real standouts in terms of him pushing his range and his charaterisations. I look forward to seeing him in Waititi’s new film and what roles he takes in the future. hopefully this will include a film that sees him sweep the major awards that he is long overdue.

What are your favourite Michael Fassbender performances? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood (2019)

Marielle Heller’s third feature A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood is a poignant glance into the morals of Fred Rogers, known as Mister Rogers, an icon of American children’s television. The film follows Lloyd Vogel (Matthew Rhys), journalist who holds onto the darkness of his past which shapes his pessimistic outlook on life. When tasked with interviewing Mister Rogers (Tom Hanks) for a profile in Esquire magazine. A sharp contrast to her previous films The Diary of a Teenage Girl (2015) and Can You Ever Forgive Me? (2018), A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood is a wonderful film that allows Heller to incorporate her realist storytelling with hints of art and quirkiness through the use of puppetry. The film marks Tom Hanks first Oscar nomination in 19 years (he was last nominated for Cast Away in the Best Leading Actor category) and features a welcome lead performance from Welsh actor Matthew Rhys who is more known for his TV work. A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood is a quieter film than its award season competitors but its message on love and forgiveness speaks volumes. What Heller manages to do is bring the softness of Mister Rogers’ personality and apply this to Vogel’s life, creating a friction and discomfort to Vogel’s character. 

During an award season that has seen female filmmakers snubbed in the directing categories, it seems that Heller has yet again been overlooked. When comparing Heller’s vision to some of the contenders in the Best Director category, I do think she is more deserving. Her film seems simultaneously grounded and innovative at the same time bringing an effortless flair. What Heller does so well is drawing out the best from both her lead and supporting actors (see Bel Powley and Kristen Wiig in The Diary of a Teenage Girl and Melissa McCarthy and Richard E. Grant in Can You Ever Forgive Me? as prime examples). I think that Heller has really come into her own and on her third feature, has managed to show us how varied her talent is and her fearlessness in tackling various genres and topics. Despite being overlooked, I think that Heller will continue to wow in her future projects and she’ll only receive more attention and acclaim.Matthew Rhys (Finalized)Performance-wise, the cast is really strong, particularly from Rhys and Hanks. Rhys brings out the protagonist’s inner conflict where the hurt that he feels is overshadowed by the anger. In fact, it seems that Vogel is more of an antagonist in the first act but as he lowers his guard, we begin to understand why he is how he is. It is ultimately a film about forgiveness and acceptance and no revelation is more important than the moment when Vogel accepts himself and his situation. The moment when he confronts his mum is heartbreaking and provides a bittersweet release for him as he allows himself to move forward with his life and enjoy the life that he has. I think that Rhys provides a side of his acting that we have not seen before and although Hanks is undoubtedly the highlight of the film, I think that Rhys will only get better from now on and has managed to successfully break into mainstream films.

In the supporting role, Hanks excels as Mister Rogers and was the big draw for critics and audiences alike and with good reason. From the moment he enters the screen, he is charismatic and gentle and truly becomes Mister Rogers. Admittedly after watching this, Hanks became my favourite for the Best Supporting Actor Oscar, although I completely appreciate that Brad Pitt was nothing short of phenomenal in Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. There was something about Hanks’ performance that harked back to the 90s when he was King of the Silver Screen that is a stark reminder that he is capable of truly captivating performances. I love Hanks in everything he does (I even compiled a top 10 which you can read here) and will admit that I find the Dan Brown adaptations entertaining but A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood is among his best. 

Another aspect of this film that I adored is the costume design. Simply and quintessentially American, Indian costume designer Arjun Bhasin does a brilliant job at encapsulating the late 90s style and mixing it with a nostalgic 70s feel when it comes to Mister Rogers. Particularly, the standout for the costume department is the iconic Mister Rogers cardigan. As an avid knitter, I was interested in reading about the conception and process of the knitting process for this film. Yasemin Esmek spent nine weeks making each cardigan and the results are amazing. The craftsmanship is so good and the details are beautiful. The costume designs overall are simple but it was important that they get the cardigan correct due to its association with Mister Rogers. I think that the costume team deserved award recognition for their work but it wasn’t to be and hopefully this only continues the interest in handmade knitted costumes in film. Much like the puppetry used for scene transitions, I love the craftsmanship and passion that was brought to the costumes and production design and feel that it is a shame that this wasn’t praised as much as other films were that were less creative. rogers3.0I wasn’t expecting to love A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood as much as I did as I thought it was going to be run-off-the-mill Oscar bait but I left the cinema feeling a mix of emotions. It was funny, dramatic, heartbreaking and hopeful all rolled into one. Despite being set in the 90s and reminiscent and nostalgic for the 70s, A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood feels fresh and seems to be a new kind of family film. It isn’t afraid of delving into dark topics while remaining appropriate and light at the same time. It stayed with me long after the credits rolled and is among my favourites of awards season. It is a shame that the film didn’t garner more than its single Oscar nomination because Heller’s direction and Nate Heller’s score are brilliant and deserved the recognition. 

What did you think of A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood? Let me know in comments below!

 

Categories
Uncategorised

Uncut Gems (2019)

I have said this once and I will say it again. When Adam Sandler puts his mind to it, he can turn out a star-studded performance that most dramatic actors can only dream of. He did it in Paul Thomas Anderson’s 2003 Punch-Drunk Love and he’s done it again in the mind-warping Uncut Gems, directed by Josh and Benny Safdie (commonly referred to as the Safdie Brothers). Following Howard Ratner (Sandler), the owner of a luxurious jewellers in the Diamond District in New York and his inability to function as a normal human would. Crippled simultaneously by debt and a gambling addiction to boot, Howard is an awful human being and the Safdies make this no secret. The audience isn’t supposed to like him and yet we do because he is charismatic and pathetic at the same time. When a priceless gem is delivered to him and loaned to basketball star Kevin Garnett, Howard finds himself on the brink of self-destruction as he struggles to get the stone back and at the auction house where he expects to earn millions. Produced by powerhouse studio A24 and distributed on Netflix, Uncut Gems is the film equivalent of an anxiety attack thanks to the unrelenting actions of its protagonist who doesn’t know how to relax. Featuring a variety of celebrity cameos including The Week’nd, Tilda Swinton and Natasha Lyonne, there is also a strong supporting cast led by Lakeith Stanfield as Howard’s assistant, Demany and Julia Fox as Howard’s girlfriend, Julia.

The Safdie Brothers’ vision comes across brilliantly on the technical side. Known for their collaborations with Ronald Bronstein who cowrote the script with both Safdies and also co-edited the film with Benny Safdie. This is a film that needed more than one mind behind the vision and the result is crisp and sleek. The writing is sharp and to the point which is crucial as there are many characters and plenty of scenes in which lots of characters populate the screen. It’s a film that benefits from its direct nature meaning that there are few speeches and little emotion. When the film does delve deep into serious emotion, it feels almost disingenuous because the characters are so self-absorbed. It is the deeply flawed characters that gives the film its grit. What I love most about this film is how fantastical it feels in terms of the tone as Howard lives a luxurious life and yet the violence he is exposed to grounds the film. There is a disconnect between the life Howie should have and the life that he does have. Despite his wealth, he is constantly viewed as an outsider for a multitude of reasons. One such reason is his Jewish faith which is constantly remarked on by his clientele, friends and those he deals with when betting. Another such reason is his inability to maintain sustainable relationships. His paranoia overtakes his love for Julia because he cannot truly fathom that a woman like her could truly love a man like him. His insecurity is a constant throughout the film and is the main reason for his instability.

uncut-garnett-sandler-1576518581

Adam Sandler is nothing short of brilliant in this film and should have been nominated for all of the awards including the Oscar. His performance is manic and seems lucid but the amount of work Sandler put into this character is clear. Howard is deeply complex. He is fully aware of his issues and yet doesn’t do anything about them. The film is constantly moving up and down as Howard’s rollercoaster way of living reflects the wins and losses he experiences in gambling. This film has become instantly quotable with gifs and memes flooding the internet. Howard’s sleaziness only adds to his dark humour and helplessness. The film is from Howard’s perspective meaning Sandler is onscreen for the vast majority of the film’s 135 minute running time. What makes the character of Howard so hypnotic and engaging to watch is that he acts like an unreliable narrator at times. We hope he pulls through but at the same time his flaws often outweigh his strengths. The climactic scene in which Howard is watching the final basketball game that he has bet all of his earnings on is deeply intense and yet he seems relatively calm. His certainty that he will win when his first bet was reliant on a coin toss is unbelievable. If there was an award for the most frustrating character in film history, Howard would definitely be up there but that is exactly how he is meant to be. He is one of the most unlikeable likeable characters I have ever come across and I think it’s credit to Sandler’s skill that he manages to pull that off.

The score provided by Oneohtrix Point Never is a showstopper. The tone that the score gives is in a similar vein to Jóhann Jóhannsson’s brilliant score for the 2018 film, Mandy. Much like Jóhannsson’s score, Oneohtrix Point Never’s score has also proven divisive but I think that Uncut Gems is a film that doesn’t hold back in its performance, script and subject matter. The music is futuristically nostalgic, merging various genres and sounds to create a soundtrack that is unique. Much like the protagonist, the score doesn’t seem to settle and keeps crashing through, heightening the tension and making for an anxiety-ridden audience experience. The score category in awards season was very strong this year but I still think it was a shame that the Uncut Gems soundtrack wasn’t at least recognised. The fact that it clashes with what you see on the screen adds to the jarring effect that the film brought.

uncutgems

Uncut Gems lives up to the hype and delivers brilliance in spades. It’s a shame that it wasn’t recognised this awards season but I believe that Sandler’s performance specifically will not go unnoticed. If anything, Uncut Gems has opened the door for Sandler to continue tackling challenging roles and it makes me excited to see what the Safdie Brothers have planned next. It’s a film that isn’t afraid to make light of the dark topics it explores such as addiction and violence. It’s reluctance to fit into a specific box of film makes it a stand out in the same way that Parasite is and I think it was stronger than a lot of contenders this awards season.

What did you think of Uncut Gems? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Bombshell (2019)

One film that has brought much buzz among the acting categories is the Fox News centred biopic Bombshell. Following numerous women working at Fox and their experiences of sexual harassment at the hands of their boss, Roger Ailes, the audience follow the lives of three women at different levels of their careers are observed. At the top of the game there is Megyn Kelly (Charlize Theron), then there is recently fired anchor, Gretchen Carlson (Nicole Kidman) and at the bottom of the tier is newcomer Kayla Pospisil (Margot Robbie) who is based on a culmination of women who worked at Fox. This was not a film I thought would be as gripping or exploitive as it was but this film contains some very upsetting material that shows the trauma that women are forced to endure in order to be successful. The event that acts as a catalyst is Kelly’s encounter with Presidential candidate Donald Trump who tweets various misogynist insults her way after a challenging exchange during the Presidential debate. We see Kelly’s world turned upside down as her and her family’s livelihood is at stake at the hands of a ruthless paparazzi and a passionately threatening audience. Simultaneously, Carlson is fired from her position and seeks to sue Ailes for sexual harassment which is described as a money grab from those at Fox. Overall, it is a film that shows the hardship of women and how dangers in the workplace seep into their personal lives. Directed by Jay Roach and written by Charles Randolph, Bombshell allows its female protagonists to develop and grow while showing their vulnerability and resilience in their quest to end the patriarchal harassment that has humiliated women at Fox over the years.

Charlize Theron is so brilliant as Kelly. In the same vein as Monster, Theron transforms into her subject and manages to perfect every detail about them. Completely deserving of the nominations that she has received, Theron’s Kelly is poised, collected and observant. She is a woman who will not be messed around. This makes the scene in which she opens up about her experience with Ailes shocking considering her strength and influence in the workplace. During the conflict with Trump, Kelly doesn’t make any vengeful comments back and instead is aware that Fox’s access to Trump during the Presidential campaign is crucial. She is able to put her own motivations to the side. It is when she puts herself first that a wave of women from Fox come out and discuss their experience. It’s no surprise that Theron has garnered her third Oscar nomination for her portrayal as this controversial figure. She has this command when she is on the screen and a strength that makes it even more shocking when comments about her menstruating are used as an excuse for her challenging nature. She is constantly given a harder time because she is a woman and not taken as seriously as her male counterparts. Equally, Kelly has respect for Ailes and when the accusations come to light, she faces a struggle between her genuine loyalty to him and the truth. In the end, she realises that she must go with the latter but this isn’t a decision that comes easy or without consequence.

In terms of our supporting protagonists, we are given Margot Robbie and Nicole Kidman as newcomer Kayla Pospisil and fired anchor Gretchen Carlson, respectively. Robbie is beyond outstanding in support and continues a stellar year. The scene in which her character is harassed and forced to show her crotch to Ailes is extremely upsetting and difficult to watch. We see Robbie’s brilliantly layered expression as she is clearly distraught and uncomfortable herself at having to do this but she knows she must grin and bear it for risk of being fired. Kayla is a fictional character but the development of her character and the depth that she is portrayed with feels very real. The idea to accumulate multiple women into one has served Randolph’s script well as it allows various perspectives to be shown without confusing or overloading the audience with too many characters. Robbie gained an Oscar nomination for her portrayal and it is so deserved. Time and time again, Robbie is showing us her range and has managed to compile a really impressive filmography following her departure from Australian soap opera Neighbours. Kayla is a character who shows a side of Robbie that we haven’t been able to see before and makes it all the more exciting to see what roles she will take on in the future.

On the other hand, Kidman is definitely underused but packs a punch when she is onscreen. I understand that with three prominent protagonists, it can be tricky to prioritise whose story to go more in depth on but it would be wrong to underestimate Gretchen’s important in this narrative. She is the initial driving force and brings this story out to public knowledge. The opening scene shows other female anchors following the rules followed by a collection of clips of Gretchen being told that her outfits are lovely as well as comments on her body with Gretchen looking uncomfortable but laughing it off. She is immediately presented as an outsider from the get go. When confronted by a woman in the supermarket who tells her that her show and Fox News are a disgrace, Gretchen doesn’t understand and twists it back on the woman. The performance doesn’t require the same level of depth and development that Theron and Robbie have to bring because Gretchen is already at the stage of rebellion but Kidman loses herself in the role. We don’t see Kidman, we see Gretchen. It would also be wrong not to mention the eerie performance from John Lithgow as Ailes. It isn’t easy to play a role like Ailes as someone who seems kind and respected but so manipulative and abusive beneath the surface. Despite having limited screen time, Ailes has a horrifying and lingering presence over the whole film and that is thanks to Lithgow’s intimidating command that he has when he is onscreen. He is very much a puppet master.

Bombshell was a surprisingly intense and thrilling film to watch. The limited use of location, primarily the Fox studios makes for a claustrophobic experience that reflects the entrapped environment that the woman work in. The intriguing part about it is how the women start speaking out without really talking to one another for fear of being outed as a traitor. Thanks to its controversial subject matter and triple female protagonist set-up, it probably will have limited success at awards season but the fact that it has received nominations is a great achievement. Theron, in particular, really brings her A game and delivers her best performance in years.

What did you think of Bombshell? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

The Wizard of Oz (1939)

With the hype of awards season in full swing, I thought I would take a look back at some older favourites of mine. Inspired by the Judy Garland biopic, Judy, what better way to connect the current awards season with a favourite classic of mine and discuss the wonderfully magical The Wizard of Oz (1939). Commonly seen as the film that propelled Judy Garland to stardom at the tender age of 16, cementing her legacy in Hollywood for years to come. The film is adored by fans of all ages and a regular watch at Christmastime. Following Kansas teen Dorothy Gale who is whisked away in a tornado along with her dog, Toto and landing in the mysterious land of Oz. Dorothy must team up with the unlikeliest of friends and find the great Wizard to find her way home. The film was mainly directed by Victor Fleming who left the production to direct Gone With the Wind and the remaining work was taken over by King Vidor. The screenplay was written by Noel Langley, Florence Ryerson and Edgar Allan Woolf and based on the classic children’s book The Wonderful Wizard of Oz by L. Frank Baum, The Wizard of Oz is a masterclass in classic Hollywood cinema.

Judy Garland is absolutely breathtaking as Dorothy. Probably one of the most perfect casting choices in film history. From her brilliant expressions and sheer talent for being an all-rounder, it’s hard not to feel moved by Garland’s performance, particularly when she sings “Over the Rainbow”. Garland’s background and the tragedy behind her experience filming this is well-known. The trauma Garland went through during the filming was sure to have had a lasting effect on her for the rest of her life. This makes the performance even more heartbreaking watching in retrospect. Dorothy has enough bravery and courage to face her enemies and stand up for herself but there is still vulnerability there and a maturity that makes her seem older than her years while at the same time bringing in that childlike innocence.

In terms of the supporting cast, the most iconic comes in the form of Margaret Hamilton’s brilliant turn as the Wicked Witch of the West. She’s just a plain nasty character and her only motive is ensuring that Dorothy doesn’t succeed in her quest. Hamilton’s voice and characterisation is a performance of legend and has resulted in one of the most identifiable villains in film history. Whether it is one of her trademarks such as “I’ll get you, my pretty, and your little dog too” to the iconic melting scene in which we see the Wicked Witch defeated after Dorothy throws a bucket of water over her. Out of the three friends, my favourite is the Cowardly Lion (Bert Lahr), mainly because I love the costume design so much and his performance of the song “If I Were King of the Forest”. It’s a film that is rich in distinguished characters that, although simple, does a good job of giving them enough screen time to be distinguishable.

I don’t know where to begin to talk about my love for the use of colour in this film. Aside from being iconic thanks to its amazing switch from black and white to brilliant technicolour with the simple opening of a door. There is so much to look into beyond Kansas representing the normal and dreary everyday and Oz being somewhere completely different. The location and setting for Kansas is natural with realistic looking prop whereas Oz is crammed full of fake creations. Munchkinland in particular is the epitome of the Oz aesthetic. It makes for a fantastically striking entrance into the land of Oz. Maybe it’s because we’re adjusted to the black and white set up that makes the colour pop out the screen even more, the design of Oz is truly spectacular. Also, the use of colour for the characters is beautifully done. From the contrast between the ruby red slippers that Dorothy wears with the Wicked Witch’s green skin and the metallic hue of the Tin Man’s paint with the Cowardly Lion’s golden mane. Oz is a land that although entirely built from imagination, also includes a multitude of texture.

I’ve already touched on the music before but it deserves a section on its own. The film is crammed full of brilliant songs that have stood the test of time. Undoubtedly, “Over the Rainbow” is the most popular but most people would also be able to sing or hum along to the likes of “Ding-Dong! The Witch is Dead” and “If I Only Had a Brain”. It is undeniable that Garland’s voice is beautiful and flawless, striking the perfect amount of emotion in her songs. Looking through the soundtrack, it is amazing to think that so many songs have gone down in cinema history as classics. A lot of the legacy from The Wizard of Oz comes from its Academy Award winning score by Herbert Stothart. Not to forget that “Over the Rainbow” also won the Oscar for Best Original Song for Harold Arlen and Yip Harburg. It’s a whimsical soundtrack that allows its audience to escape to Oz with Dorothy.

I am sure given that I love films like Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs and The Red Shoes that I am just as fond of this one. The Wizard of Oz is an outstandingly beautiful cinematic achievement and a prime example of a film that is suitable for all ages and all cinematic tastes. It is a film that combines drama, comedy and musical while also not fearing to delving into themes of loss and friendship. Dorothy is ultimately on a journey to finding out who she is and discovering her place of belonging. It’s this relatability that makes the film so identifiable with audiences around the globe.

What do you think of The Wizard of Oz? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

The Two Popes (2019)

The first film I watched this decade is a surprising choice in the form of biopic The Two Popes following the conservative Cardinal Ratzinger (Anthony Hopkins) who becomes Pope Benedict XVI and his eventual friendship with the more liberal Cardinal Bergoglio (Jonathan Pryce), who later becomes Pope Francis. Directed by Brazilian director Fernando Meirelles with a script written by Anthony McCarten based on the latter’s novel The Pope, The Two Popes manages to successfully avoid falling into the trap of becoming another studio churned out biopic. There is no doubt that the two leads are the stars of the show and contribute a lot to the film’s overall acclaim but Meirelles control on the tone of the film and McCarten’s deeply intense script make The Two Popes a thrilling watch, particularly scenes when it is the two gentleman by themselves. The film’s strength comes in its constant shift in dynamic. The opening scenes follow the death of Pope John Paul II and the deciding vote on who will be his successor and the differences between the two eventual popes are crystal clear. Cardinal Ratzinger does everything in his power to become Pope and succeeds by persuading his fellow Cardinals during breaks from voting whereas Bergoglio is discomforted by the prospect of becoming pontiff. There seems to be a projected rivalry on the two men which Ratzinger seems to act on but Bergoglio is perplexed by this narrative.

The power from this film comes from the brilliant screenplay by McCarten. His script reads like a power struggle at times as the dynamic shifts between the two popes’ favour throughout. The inclusion of flashbacks and context into their histories also helps the film to avoid being just a simple story of one Pope’s decline and another’s ascension. There is no bias for either one as we are just presented with facts such as Ratzinger’s admission that he knew about the molestation within the Church before the scandal came to light. Despite the two men being a part of the same religion, they have completely different viewpoints. Ratzinger feels that resigning is the only way to seek absolution whereas Bergoglio thinks that he should remain Pope and see the scandal through to the end. Bergoglio’s upbringing and story is filled with a lot more turmoil than Ratzinger who seems to have had a more privileged upbringing. Their conflicting interests and differing politics result in Bergoglio coming across as more compassionate than Ratzinger because he is more accepting and open to change. The ending scene with the two men watching the football is funny to watch and makes for a light tone to suggest that their friendship is on good terms.

The two leads excel in their roles as expected. Jonathan Pryce is absolutely brilliant in the leading role as Bergoglio who is the quietly outspoken of the two. Constantly having to justify his stance on controversial topics that differ from the conservative Church teachings, Bergoglio is seen equally as a disgrace and a revolutionary within the Church. It comes to light that this has been the case all his life with his complicated background during the Argentinian militaria regime. Whereas Ratzinger revels in the tradition and opulence of the Catholic Church, Bergoglio is happy with what he has. He doesn’t understand why those high up in the Church live in such luxury. Pryce is perfect casting in both his appearance and his characterisation, truly becoming the future pope. You never know what he is going to do or say next because he is unpredictable. One minute he will be conversing in Latin with Ratzinger and the next he will be teaching him how to tango.

Anthony Hopkins’ performance is his best in film for years. Bringing out mannerisms subtly with an understated accent and acting that seems effortless but is really meticulous, Hopkins is fantastic as the newly elected Pope. Ratzinger is not necessarily a likeable character because he is so set in his ways and has many dated opinions that don’t fit in with the times. He is clearly a highly intelligent man and extremely well-read but also detached from modern society. In some ways Bergoglio tests him to embrace the present world more and try to adapt. We don’t see as much of Ratzinger’s background as Bergoglio’s but Hopkins gives us enough to know that he has always been a lonely figure. The scene in which Ratzinger gives Bergoglio his confession is fantastic. The audience lingers on Hopkins’ words as he reveals his difficult time growing up and being saved by God.

In terms of awards buzz, The Two Popes has garnered attention for Pryce and Hopkins’ performances. I don’t think either will win due to strong competition in both categories but they are deserved nominations. I didn’t think I would find this film particularly enjoyable but I was pleasantly surprised. The performances alone are enough to the grip the viewer but it proved to be even more. It’s not a film about religion but more of a character study about two very men who are connected because of that religion. There were many gripping scenes filled with tension as the two popes debate about various aspects of the church. I also wasn’t expecting the film to have so many funny moments as well and it doesn’t feel too heavy in subject matter. I think following it primarily from the point of view of Bergoglio was a smart choice as we see the events from both the inside and the outside depending on what is happening.

What did you think of The Two Popes? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Dolemite Is My Name (2019)

Dolemite Is My Name is a brilliant look into the life of African-American icon Rudy Ray Moore played by Eddie Murphy in a career best performance. Moore is a man of many talents: acting, singing and stand-up. His comedy routines are his way into fame as he channels an alter ego Dolemite, a pimp style man of the 70s who speaks in rhyme and quickly builds up a fan base within the African-American community across the US. The film specifically follows his rise to stardom and the production of his first film Dolemite, a blaxploitation feature in which he plays his comedic alter ego. Directed by Craig Brewer and written by Scott Alexander and Larry Karaszewski, Dolemite is my Name marks a welcome return to Eddie Murphy as a leading man on the big screen and also boasts a brilliant supporting cast with Craig Robinson, Tituss Burgess, Keegan-Michael Key and Snoop Dogg. It’s brash and upfront, unafraid of its subject and showing just how far one will go for their time in the spotlight. The writing is spectacular and even the scenes where Moore isn’t speaking in rhyme almost have a poetic quality to them. Every pause and interaction has a flow that works brilliantly in the film and the characters interact naturally. You completely believe and engage with the characters and at no point are drawn away from the film. The direction is quick and sharp with eye-catching colour palettes that exemplify Moore’s even more colourful personality. Everything about this film was completely wonderful to watch.

In a sea of biopics, it would be easy to miss this one which seemed to sneak onto Netflix without fanfare but that would be your loss. Moore is a man who loves the limelight and will do anything to get it. He will do whatever it takes to become famous even if it means nudity, violence or strong language. He isn’t afraid of vulgarity and thrives on the offensive nature of his content. Who better to play such a controversial figure than Eddie Murphy? Murphy allows himself to embrace all aspects of Moore’s personality from his strong bravado to his insecurities and flaws. He has left no stone unturned in his preparation and the result is a captivating and stunning performance that does the Moore legacy proud. I hope Murphy continues releasing films like this that show his talent and range as an actor. In this film alone, he has to sing, act and perform stand-up as a man who is himself portraying a character. That is tricky to pull off and yet Murphy seems to do this effortlessly. This is a film that has a big cast list and yet Murphy is the draw and the centre of attention at all times. There aren’t many moments when he isn’t onscreen and yet his presence is anticipated and felt. Of course, this is only natural since it is a biopic on his character but it really is a magnetic performance.

dolemite

As mentioned before, the supporting cast is crammed full of amazing talent. If I had to choose one that stands out from the rest, it is probably Keegan-Michael Key as screenwriter and actor Jerry Jones. Jones is an earnest playwright who makes films that explore racism in modern society. When initially approached by Moore to write the screenplay for the Dolemite movie, he is reluctant to jump onboard but is eventually taken in by the scope of Moore’s fanbase. His reactions during and after filming the sex scene for the movie is priceless. Jones is a character who is taken way out of his comfort and it initially makes him seem like the only sane person in a crazy bunch but eventually he allows himself to have fun with it. I also really enjoyed Craig Robinson’s appearance as Moore’s friend, Ben Taylor, who provides the theme song for the Dolemite movie. His role is only small but when he is onscreen, it’s wonderful to watch. The character of Taylor is great to watch as it shows his support from before Moore’s fame and ascension. The supporting characters really do support one another. It is a film that, although centred around one individual, tells the stories of multiple people. One touching story is Lady Reed (Da’Vine Joy Randolph) who is cheated on by her husband and doesn’t know what to do with her life. Alongside Moore, she stars in the film and joins him on the stage for stand-up. Although she is assisted by Moore, Lady Reed is strongly independent and isn’t afraid of sticking up for herself and her beliefs. The scene in which she thanks Moore for putting a plus size woman of colour onscreen allows Moore to realise that his project goes beyond entertaining people.

Although it has grabbed the attention of awards panels, particularly Eddie Murphy’s performance, it feels as though Dolemite Is My Name has been swept under the carpet. This could be due to Netflix’s loyalty to its other release, The Irishman, and so they have pushed that far more. In truth, I prefer Dolmite Is My Name as a film because it feels like something new and unique whereas The Irishman brings out what Scorsese does best but nothing that we haven’t seen before. I hope that if anything Murphy gets an Oscar nomination because it would be a real shame not to acknowledge the brilliant work he does on this film.

dolemite1

In a climate that has seen a rise in racism and extremist politics taking hold, Dolemite Is My Name is a film that is desperately needed. It is thoroughly entertaining and provides plenty of laughs but it equally holds no punches in its subject matter and isn’t afraid to explore the darker truths of society. It’s interesting to think that such a diverse figure such as Moore was renowned and accepted in the 70s but the struggle and work he had to put in to get there is testament to the struggles that African-Americans face on a regular basis. I hope that there are more films like this released in coming years as it is so important to present stories from all walks of life.

What did you think of Dolemite Is My Name? Let me know in the comments below!