Categories
Uncategorised

Midsommar (2019)

As Summer is coming to an end, I thought it would be apt to write a post on my favourite film of the season. Unsurprisingly enough, it comes in the form of a summertime nightmare with Ari Aster’s second feature Midsommar. Following on from his brilliant debut, Hereditary (2018), Aster has managed to surpass expectations and once again brings us a new and refreshing take on traditional horror. The film follows college student, Dani (Florence Pugh) who joins her boyfriend, Christian (Jack Reynor) and his friends: Mark (Will Poulter), Josh (William Jackson Harper) and Pelle (Vilhelm Blomgren) on a trip to Sweden to observe a rare festival among Pelle’s familial commune. Things quickly turn sour as members of the group begin to disappear without a trace. It’s easy enough to expect a film in the same vein as The Wicker Man when introduced to the pagan style life the commune leads in the Swedish woods.

Florence Pugh’s leading turn only helps to further push her presence as an actress to watch. Dani is one of the most complex female characters to arise from modern cinema. We see her shift from the Westernised world that she lives in where there is no hope for her to the cult where she begins to feel belonging. It’s a haunting portrayal of depression and anxiety and is shown in an explicit way that hasn’t been explored before. The events in the film happen due to other’s people actions but they are always directly in relation to Dani and her welfare. Pugh’s acting chops are really highlighted in the dance scene where she becomes so absorbed in the competition that she finds herself speaking Swedish fluently with her competitors. The scene is transformative for Dani as she allows herself to be open to the ceremony and the community.

Photo_03

The supporting cast also knock it out the park with their performances. Will Poulter in particular gives a career best as the ignorant Mark, who literally and figuratively pisses all over the commune’s celebrations. Whereas Dani’s demons are hidden below the surface, the male characters’ flaws are on show for all to see. Whereas Dani is ridiculed for her struggles in US, the tables are turned for the men in the commune as women dominate the landscape. The film’s goriest scenes are mainly at the cost of the ignorant visitors and yet it doesn’t feel like a slasher film. The audience, like the characters, are outsiders but they are invading the ceremony and evoke little sympathy from the audience because of their ignorance and greed. Jack Reynor also excels as Dani’s emotionally distant boyfriend, Chris. He has allowed himself to become so detached to Dani that he acts emotionless and unsympathetic when tragedy strikes at the beginning of the film. He is unwilling to see how wrong he treats her as she struggles to fight for his love and repair things. During the film, we see Christian’s confidence shaken as he becomes targeted by the cult.

As expected, Aster’s script and direction showcase his talent as an original voice in film and his fearless approach to filmmaking. He isn’t afraid to explore taboo subjects or make the audience uncomfortable. One such scene is during an ättestupa ceremony where two elderly people jump from a high cliff. Aster doesn’t allow the camera to turn away as we see the bodies hit the ground. The reactions that Dani and co feel become all the more real because Aster forces the audience to experience it as well. It’s a film that demands the attention in details from its audience. Every aspect of the costumes and set have been well thought out and serve a purpose that pay off later in the film. The use of striking visual sets make it a memorable film and the immaculate beauty of the cult’s village make the strict lifestyle all the more terrifying. I think this film shows a growth in directorial vision from Aster’s standpoint as he really allows the audience to get into Dani’s psyche. The true brilliance of this film is Aster’s ability to contrast Dani’s claustrophobic feelings to the open space that the commune live in so effectively.

midsommar-cult-happyfaces-700x308

Another aspect I loved about the film was the use of costumes. Not only the ethereal and fresh qualities the commune colours have which seem refreshing when we first see the village. The standout costume, however, comes in a brilliant floral creation worn by Dani in the films final scenes. In any other film, it would seem ridiculous but it makes sense in this film. It both stands out and blends in at the same time and plays a big role in the terrifying climatic scene.

If it were up to me, this film would be a safe contender for various mainstream awards but I am aware that it is too violent and “out there” for some. It is not a film for the faint of heart or easily offended. Between the subtle cannibalism, male frontal nudity and graphic sex scenes, this isn’t a comfortable film to watch but that is what makes it such a brilliant piece of cinema.

What did you think of the film? Did you like it as much? What was your film of the summer? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Once Upon a Time… in Hollywood (2019)

Arguably the most hyped film of the year sees acclaimed director Quentin Tarantino return to his native Hollywood for his ninth (and penultimate) outing. Set in 1969 where hippies reigned and Hollywood stars are quickly on the wain, this film was always going to be the most personal for Tarantino as this film provides the backdrop of his own childhood. It’s a film that provides plenty of Tarantino techniques as well as showing his growth as a filmmaker and storyteller.

It seems only natural that a film set in Hollywood should discuss the cast first. A star studded ensemble headed by Oscar winner, Leonardo DiCaprio in his second collaboration with Tarantino as leading man Rick Dalton who is in desperate need for a decent role to revitalise his waning career. Dalton seems to wallow in self-pity as he is offered role after role on television but isn’t satisfied with the characters. Dalton is the polar opposite of DiCaprio, who is at a point in his life where he is playing some of the most interesting and challenging characters in film today. Ironically, the best character Dalton plays is himself, with a complex self-hatred which contrasts with his desire to see his face everywhere he goes (his house is cluttered with movie posters and his car parking space has a giant painting of his face). Dalton is surrounded by the expectations of the man he once was that he cannot live up to the standards of the actor he could be now. One of the best scenes in the film sees Rick have a drunken breakdown in his trailer when he lightly messes up a scene. Promising never to drink again as he swigs from his whiskey flask, it’s abundantly clear that Dalton’s worst enemy is himself. Partner this with Brad Pitt’s cool and collected Cliff Booth, Dalton’s long-term stunt double who lives in a crammed trailer with his dog behind a drive-through cinema, Cliff dreams of stability after allegedly killing his wife but his rough nature gets in the way. Featuring a controversial scene in which he beats the shit out of Bruce Lee, Booth appears introverted and vulnerable but has a violent streak in a bid to survive.

Screen-Shot-2019-05-10-at-10.19.22-9d771b4.png

One of the major talking points in the run up to the film was the handling of Hollywood actress, Sharon Tate, who was one of the real life victims of the Manson Murders. Portrayed by Margot Robbie, we see Sharon in the early stages of her career. From the get go, this was a perfect casting choice. Robbie has shown her strengths and growth as an actress from her breakout role in The Wolf of Wall Street to her Oscar-nominated turn in I, Tonya where she portrayed infamous ice-skater, Tonya Harding. Tate is a more relaxed departure and has a naivety as she navigates her career and enters public life alongside husband, Roman Polanksi who at this point had achieve international acclaim for Rosemary’s Baby. Renowned for her beauty and kind-nature, Tate was in the midst of releasing new film The Wrecking Crew in 1969. In a scene that is both heartwarming and breaking at the same time, we see Tate sneak into a cinema to watch her film among the general public. Her reactions as the audience laugh and cheer her character on allow us to see the woman behind the eventual tragedy, an opportunity for her to be known for something more than a murder victim. Of course it wouldn’t be a Tarantino film if we didn’t see someone’s feet which confused audiences alike. I think it was Tarantino’s way of paying tribute to her while also breaking the blur between reality and fiction. An odd tribute but a tribute all the same.

The big turning point in the film comes when Cliff visits Spahn Ranch, home of Charles Manson’s “family” after an encounter with a potentially underage member (Margaret Qualley). The tone mirrors that of a horror film as Cliff walks the long path to the head house to check on its owner, George Spahn (Bruce Dern). I think that this will go down as one of Tarantino’s best scenes as the direction is impeccable. By this point we’ve seen Cliff’s ability to fight so we know that he is capable of defending himself; however, Tarantino uses the hindsight and context of the situation to drive fear in the audience as crowds of young, waif-like hippies crowd around him in droves. It’s a scene that combines the suspense of The Hateful Eight, the Western qualities of Django Unchained and the hazy Californian setting of Pulp Fiction that brings something quintessentially Tarantino while also showing us something new.

spahn-ranch.png

Now for my favourite part of any film – the script! I wouldn’t be surprised to see Tarantino among the nominees for Best Original Screenplay come awards season. He may even walk away with his third gong at the Academy Awards. The dialogue seems sharper and more realistically placed than his previous offerings. Tarantino does a great job of recreating his childhood through detailed settings and timely cultural references. Whereas Pulp Fiction has plenty of iconic quotes and relies on the words on the page, Once Upon a Time… In Hollywood is quite the opposite and much like its subject, it closes in on the actors and is very physically demanding. The film is largely reserved in its violence for the most part, culminating in a massive showdown at the end which justifies the 18 certificate it received. The film is profoundly analytical and draws more similarities to Boogie Nights than Pulp Fiction in my eyes due to the exposure of the grit beneath the glamour of stardom. Tarantino also takes away his use of “chapters”, instead splitting the films into specific days in the run up to the day of the Manson murders. The direction is brilliant in that it showcases a global talent from the confines of his house for the most part. The importance of the home is reiterated throughout the film as Sharon and Roman have recently moved in to the house next door to Rick who mainly stays in (mostly in part to the drinking problem he has as well as his will to ostracise himself). This is ultimately a film about Tarantino’s home literally and figuratively through his childhood but also cinema as a safe place.

The scope of this film is so vast that it is simply impossible to discuss every aspect in one simple review but it’s definitely a film that requires more than one watch. I wouldn’t be surprised if Tarantino even walked away with his long awaited Best Director Oscar which would thoroughly be deserved. This is the film that he was born to make and only builds up even more hype for his alleged final film. I have a feeling that this will be the film to beat.

Have you seen Once Upon a Time… In Hollywood yet? What did you think?

Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Disney Animated Classics: Numbers 41-45 Ranking

Sorry for the long break! I’ve been so busy that I haven’t found the time to write up my articles. However, I’m back and ready to carry on with my rankings. I’m sure you’re all dying to see the end result!

Riding on the success of the Disney Renaissance, the studio finds itself in a period of cockiness and nostalgia and proves that the overwhelming success of the 90s didn’t just come on a whim. The head honchos believe that now is a good time to release direct-to-video sequels and prequels galore to accompany the re-releases of the classics that are released from the Disney Vault. This is also a time when lots of projects that were overlooked during the Renaissance find their way onto the big screen.

As ever you can read the previous instalments here:

Films 1-5

Films 6-10

Films 11-15

Films 16-20

Films 21-25

Films 26-30

Films 31-35

Films 36-40

The majority of these films were not kindly looked upon critically or commercially compared to the predecessors of the previous decade. I do have a soft spot for this bunch as I went to see all of them in the cinema (with the exception of Home on the Range) and I have fond memories of watching them all on a loop. However, I do admit that they don’t have the lasting legacy that other Disney offerings have and despite being under 20 years old, they are often overlooked.

Without further ado, let’s crack on with the reviews for films 41-45:

41) Atlantis: The Lost Empire (2001)

Disney spared no expense on the production and marketing for this film (between $90-120 million was spent) and it was everywhere you looked. Atlantis was expected to be the next great Disney epic and the media and audience lapped the hype up only to be disappointed by the end result. Following Atlantis enthusiast Milo Thatch (voiced by Michael J. Fox) who embarks on a mission to find the lost kingdom, Atlantis is visually stunning and boasts some of Disney’s finest animation. What this film brings in style, it lacks in substance with a script that doesn’t feel finished. We’re presented with an array of one-dimensional characters but the real star of the show is Atlantis’ Princess Kida who is fascinated by the outsiders and wants to form a relationship with the outside world. It’s a shame that Disney hasn’t followed on her legacy in the past few years as she is overlooked in the Disney Princess canon constantly. This is a film that I thoroughly enjoy watching as there are numerous scenes that I hugely appreciate such as the Leviathan attack on the submarine, the scene where Kida is taken over by the protective crystal and the climatic battle in the volcano where Milo faces off the corrupt soldiers. It’s a film that (like 1985’s The Black Cauldron) deserved better writing and fleshed out characters but ultimately falls flat and has become forgotten with time.

42) Lilo & Stitch (2002)

One of the most loved modern Disney films about a young Hawaiian girl who befriends an alien on the run from his creator, Lilo & Stitch is a heartwarming film about differences and the struggle to fit in. Lilo is a quirky little girl whose hobbies include taking pictures of sunburnt tourists and playing Elvis Presley songs full blast. She is badly bullied by those in her dance class and unknowingly acts out, causing problems for her older sister, Nani who is also her guardian. When social services start to look into taking Lilo away, Nani thinks it’d be good for Lilo to get a pet dog to keep her preoccupied. Enter Experiment 626, the runaway alien who finds himself in the dog kennel. Lilo is immediately taken by his physical differences and ability to speak that she immediately adopts him, names him Stitch and shows him around the island. There’s a reason that this film has become among the most iconic and recognisable of modern Disney. Its message about the importance of family is one that immediately resonates with the audience. The scene in which Nani sings “Aloha Oe” to Lilo as she comes to terms with the prospect that Lilo will be taken away is one of the most heartbreaking and, because of this, daring scenes that Disney have put to screen. This aspect of loss makes the payoff even better when Stitch recites Lilo’s motto that “ohana means family” to Nani. The film is one that has touched hearts around the globe and Stitch is among the most iconic Disney characters of the modern era.

43) Treasure Planet (2002)

A project that had been pushed back for ten years, Treasure Planet finally saw its release in 2002. Featuring an all-star cast that includes Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Emma Thompson and an extortionate budget ($140 million!), this futuristic retelling of Robert Louis Stevenson’s Treasure Island about a young man who comes in possession of a highly-sought treasure map and sets off with a group of pirates to seek it has been subject to countless adaptations throughout the year. Never has this story been told in space where aliens take up most of the characters and the audience is taken across the galaxy in search of an entire planet that is filled with treasure. Utilising computer animation more so than previous films, Treasure Planet attempts to hurl Disney into a new era. Sadly, like Atlantis before it, the result is hugely underwhelming and we’re left with another forgettable entry in the Disney catalogue. I think the script is strong, following the premise of its source material but the style feels inconsistent to me. Visually, it is quite overwhelming as there is a lot going on. It’s a world inhabited by humans, aliens, traditional structures and futuristic architecture. It feels like a mesh of the past and the future which comes across disjointed as there isn’t a middle-ground. 

44) Brother Bear (2003)

Made on a more modest budget of $46 million, Brother Bear follows Kenai, a young tribesman who is transformed into a bear after recklessly hunting down and killing a bear in the mountains of the spirits. Joined by young cub, Koda, Kenai must find his way back to the mountain in order to be turned back. The film is definitely a middling effort and feels rushed in execution. My favourite aspect of the film is the great soundtrack that includes songs by Phil Collins and the mesmerising track “Transformation” sang by the Bulgarian Women’s Choir. The scene in which Kenai is transformed is beautifully done and it’s a shame that the rest of the film doesn’t follow that standard. It’s an enjoyable watch but doesn’t hold its own against the greater works by Disney. It’s a shame that it wastes such a talented cast that includes Joaquin Phoenix as Kenai and Rick Moranis making a rare return to voice work as one half of a randomly included moose duo. It feels that the tone is imbalanced throughout as there is a serious undertone that is constantly overthrown by characters such as the moose. Their humour doesn’t fit in well and it makes the overall experience jarring.

45) Home on the Range (2004)

By far one of the worst films ever to come out of the Disney studio, Home on the Range follows a group of cows who attempt to capture a cattle rustler called Alameda Slim. I enjoyed this film on release but sadly I don’t enjoy it at all watching it now. It’s forgetful and doesn’t have the same amount of Disney charm as the other instalments. The plot is weak and generic and the characters are bland. Featuring voice work by Judi Dench, Jennifer Tilly and Randy Quaid among others, Home on the Range falls into the trap of style over substance and suffers tremendously for it. Continuing the trend for middling efforts and released among a fleet of direct-to-video sequels and prequels, Home on the Range doesn’t stand out for its mundane effort. Sadly, there is a reason why Home on the Range is always forgotten and eschewed in Disney marketing and merchandise. There isn’t anything in the film that is marketable or memorable for the audience.

It’s mad to think that there are only two more posts left in this series until we’re up to date. The next post sees Disney delve into computer animation with Chicken Little (2005) and Meet the Robinsons (2007) and enter a new era of Disney masterpieces with The Princess and the Frog (2009) and Tangled (2010)

Here is my ranking:

1) Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937)

2) Fantasia (1940)

3) Beauty and the Beast (1991)

4) Sleeping Beauty (1959)

5) Bambi (1942)

6) The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh (1977)

7) The Lion King (1994)

8) Mulan (1998)

9) The Little Mermaid (1989)

10) Alice in Wonderland (1951)

11) Aladdin (1992)

12) The Aristocats (1971)

13) One Hundred and One Dalmatians (1961)

14) The Emperor’s New Groove (2000)

15) The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1996)

16) Lilo & Stitch (2002)

17) Peter Pan (1953)

18) The Three Caballeros (1945)

19) Pinocchio (1940)

20) Pocahontas (1995)

21) Tarzan (1999)

22) Dumbo (1941)

23) Hercules (1997)

24) The Black Cauldron (1985)

25) Atlantis: the Lost Empire (2001)

26) The Great Mouse Detective (1986)

27) Treasure Planet (2002)

28) Brother Bear (2003)

29) The Jungle Book (1967)

30) The Sword in the Stone (1963)

31) Cinderella (1950)

32) The Rescuers (1977)

33) Robin Hood (1973)

34) Oliver & Company (1988)

35) Lady and the Tramp (1955)

36) The Fox and the Hound (1981)

37) Fun and Fancy Free (1947)

38) The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr. Toad (1949)

39) Saludos Amigos (1943)

40) Melody Time (1948)

41) Fantasia 2000 (2000)

42) The Rescuers Down Under (1990)

43) Make Mine Music (1946)

44) Home on the Range (2004)

45) Dinosaur (2000)

 

What do you think of the list? Do you think I’ve been too harsh on these entries? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Child’s Play Ranking

The Child’s Play franchise is among the first horrors that I watched and introduced me to the world of horror films alongside the Final Destination films. Featuring a demonic doll called Chucky who is possessed by the spirit of murderer Charles Lee Ray (Brad Dourif) in all but the last films (the 2019 has a different set-up altogether), we see Chucky’s murderous attempts to become human again and what he will do in order to get there.

Created and directed by Don Mancini, the Child’s Play franchise are films that Mancini and Dourif are clearly passionate about. Even at their worst, the films are still entertaining and fun to watch. With the new remake/reboot out in cinemas featuring a new cast and production team and await\ning the 2020 TV show from Mancini with Brad Dourif back as the iconic voice of Chucky, I thought it would be a good idea to review and rank all of the released films from best to worst (including the 2019 film).

Without further ado, let’s begin:

Child’s Play (1988)

The franchise began in the late eighties in a decade that saw the creation of some of the most iconic slasher villains such as Freddie Kruegar and Jason Voorhees. Andy Barclay is a young boy gifted a Good Guy doll called Chucky for his sixth birthday. Murders suddenly begin occurring around Andy and his mum with Andy insisting that not only is his doll alive but he is possessed with the soul of a killer and is committing the murders. The audience views this film from the perspective of the adults as we don’t actually see Chucky come to life until halfway through the film when Andy’s mum threatens to burn the doll. The franchise has come to be ridiculed for its over the top humour but the first installment is actually underrated. The script is fantastic and well paced with Brad Dourif’s performance being the clear standout. He manages to makes Chucky truly terrifying without veering it into ridiculous territory.

MV5BODRiOWRmYWQtYTcxOS00YmEyLWIzODYtN2RhZmI4NDkwZmVlXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNzU1NzE3NTg@._V1_CR0,45,480,270_AL_UX477_CR0,0,477,268_AL_

Child’s Play 2 (1990)

The first sequel to the original takes place soon after where we left off with Andy’s mum being placed in a psychiatric ward and Andy is now in foster care with Joanne and Phil along with fellow foster child, Kyle, a rebellious teen who sneaks out on dates and smokes. Chucky is remade at the Good Guy factory but escapes in a quest to find Andy so he can “hide the soul” become human again. It’s a strong sequel that follows the exact same precedent as the original but that’s not always a bad thing. Brad Dourif provides a charismatic performance as ever as the evil doll and Alex Vincent delivers another great performance. The film contains some of my favourite highlights of the entire franchise such as the school scene in which Andy’s overly strict teacher meets her demise at the hands of a ruler. It also features the word “microchip” being used as an insult which I think is absolutely fantastic.

Child’s Play 3 (1991)

Fast forward right years in time and 16 year-old sent to military school after he struggles to find a suitable foster home. Replacing Alex Vincent as Andy is Justin Whalin who does a good job with what he’s given. The story isn’t as strong as its predecessors due to its attempts to tone down the humour and increase the violence, earning the franchise its first 18 rated certificate. When there is humour, it doesn’t quite land as the film takes itself too seriously to be tongue in cheek like the previous installments. This isn’t to say it’s a terrible film, there are some highlight scenes in there. One example is when the students play a huge game of paintball to practice their shooting skills and Chucky has replaced the paint with live bullets unknown to the students or officers. It also features one of the best endings in the entire franchise, taking place in a haunted house ride at a travelling carnival.

Childs-Play-3-reviews-movie-film-movie-horror-1991-overview-16

Bride of Chucky (1998)

After the negative reception to the third film, the writers decided to put an emphasis on the humour that audiences had come to love about Chucky. Introducing Jennifer Tilly to the franchise as Tiffany, Chucky’s lover when he was human, who is obsessed with the stories relating to the Chucky doll. She manages to get ahold of the doll and fixes him back up, giving him what will be his recognisable scars. Imprisoning Chucky when he comes back to life, Tiffany is killed and turned into a doll and the two aim to find a pair of humans to transfer their souls into. Watching this film after the first three is a shock because tonally, it is so different but it is an entertaining film that isn’t afraid to parody itself (cue all the slasher horror references at the start of the film). It’s definitely on the weaker end of the franchise but I do find it enjoyable to watch and it is a different kind of horror than what we are used to seeing.

Bride_of_Chucky_Netflix_FB

Seed of Chucky (2004)

Despite the mixed reviews for Bride of Chucky, Mancini decided to push the envelope further when creating the following film, Seed of Chucky. Following the offspring of Tiffany and Chucky, Glen/Glenda travels to Hollywood to visit the set of a film based on his/her parents. It’s less violent and more camp, taking inspiration from the flamboyant horror B movies like Glen/Glenda. It’s become a modern cult film among fans and is undoubtedly the worst film in the franchise but it is fun to watch because it is so ridiculous. It also features cameos from the likes of S Club 7’s Hannah Spearritt with Billy Boyd providing the voice for Glen/Glenda. It’s a film that pokes too much fun at itself and becomes a product that goes beyond satire. It’s good fun for the audience to watch but in a “so bad it’s good” way.

Curse of Chucky (2013)

Nearly a decade on from the last film and Mancini decides to give the franchise a complete do-over. Mancini takes away the humour and brings in a new backstory. Nica (played Fiona Dourif, Brad Dourif’s daughter) is a paraplegic who has recently moved into a decrepit house with her mother. One day, Nica receives a Good Guy in the post. As ever, the doll is alive and sets on killing every person in the house bringing some extremely gory results. The film is fantastic as a standalone but also as an installment and is a welcome return to the franchise that audiences loved from the beginning. It features one of the most intense dinner scenes in any film I have seen. I think that releasing it as straight-to-DVD was a smart move as the film pleasantly surprised audiences as there weren’t high expectations for it. Much like the original 1988 film, Curse is a slow burner and we don’t see Chucky in action until later on in the film.

Cult of Chucky (2017)

Following on from the critical success of Curse of Chucky, Cult of Chucky follows Nica who has been committed to a psych ward where she is recovering. Using the same solution as the original films, Chucky tries to “hide the soul” in Nica’s body. Both Dourifs give knockout performances. The standout scenes in this film are the ones where they are able to bounce off each other. This film was made on a tiny budget compared to the other installments but it doesn’t feel like it. Like Curse, Cult is filmed primarily in one location meaning that more money can be used on the special effects. It’s a film that never lets the audience relax. There are few breathing moments as Chucky casts down terror on the patients in the ward. It’s a claustrophobic film that has you feeling trapped like the patients.

Screen-Shot-2017-06-29-at-8.14.03-AM-1024x656

Child’s Play (2019)

Bringing in an entirely new team for this remake/reboot was always going to be interesting to watch. The first to be made without Don Mancini’s input, 2019’s Child’s Play puts the 1988 film into a 21st century context. You can read my full review for the new installment here.

So that’s 31 years of horror in one post! It’s amazing to see how the plots change with the times and how these films strive to follow trends that are seen in horrors specifically in the context of their release beginning with the slashers of the 80s, the comedies of the late 90s/early 00s and the darker, gorier inclusions in the 2010s.

Here is the ranking:

1) Child’s Play (1988)

2) Child’s Play 2 (1990)

3) Curse of Chucky (2013)

4) Cult of Chucky (2014)

5) Child’s Play (2019)

6) Child’s Play 3 (1991)

7) Bride of Chucky (1998)

8) Seed of Chucky (2004)

What did you think? What is your favourite Child’s Play film? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Child’s Play (2019)

This was a bittersweet film to watch. As an avid fan of the Child’s Play franchise, it’s been interesting to see how it has evolved over the years from the generic horror slasher in the first three films to experimental (and not always successful) horror comedy in the next two films to a reboot of two films starring Brad Dourif’s daughter, Fiona Dourif, as a paraplegic who’s life is torn to shreds in extra gory installments. Now forward to 2019 and we see Orion Pictures going ahead with a reboot unapproved by the film’s creator, Don Mancini, which further caused Brad Dourif to drop out from the iconic role to star in Mancini’s upcoming Child’s Play TV show. Instead we are given Mark Hamill as the voice of Chucky which was always going to be a great choice as Hamill is a fantastic voice actor (the Joker in the Batman TV series and Sunsnatcher in Brigsby Bear are personal highlights).

Giving the film a clean slate and a new backstory, this 2019 reboot brings Chucky into the 21st century. When a Vietnamese factiry worker is cruelly given the boot, he programs the Buddi doll he is building to have no inhibitions and no violence indiciators, meaning that the doll will be capable of anything. This doll finds it way into the life of Andy (Gabriel Bateman), a teenager who has just moved into a new city with his mum (played by Aubrey Plaza). The name is changed from Good Guy to Buddi (with a wifi signal above the i) and the doll can connect wirelessly to other devices in the house such a televisions, music players and the lights. There is a way to track the doll itself through an app on a phone. This remake could have easily been illogical and cheesy but the updates feel relevant for the time period with Andy, even referring to the older model he is gifted with as a “little kid’s toy”.

There is a lot to like about this film. An interesting aspect that makes it stand out is that Chucky genuinely wants to make Andy happy but he goes about this in a violent manner and misinterprets what Andy wants. On scene in particular that stands out is when Chucky observes as Andy and his new friends watch The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2. The teens laugh as the characters in the film are killed and torn to shreds, making Chucky believe that Andy wants this to happen in real life and tries to kill one of his friends. The film spends its first act building the characters of Andy and Chucky and the killing spree that follows doesn’t feel forced.

I’d be interested to see if they make a sequel from this one because it was enjoyable to watch and was a good combination of horror and comedy. Hamill’s performance was brilliant as ever and Aubrey Plaza is great in her role as Karen. Karen is clearly broken by the situation of having to move and poor financial circumstance but she tries to keep it together for sake of her son. Plaza isn’t in the film as much as I would have liked but maybe they’ll cast her in a sequel.

Categories
Uncategorised

Toy Story 4 (2019)

I won’t give away too much of the specific plot away in my review but the basic storyline is new owner Bonnie creates a toy out of trash, Forky, who becomes her favourite toy but he longs to be back with the trash. When the family take a road trip, Forky jumps out the window to become trash meaning Woody has to go collect him and bring him back to Bonnie. The film is then set in a quaint little town that has a travelling carnival visiting and Pixar makes use of this inclusion with aplomb. Pixar studio always said that they would only go ahead with Toy Story 4 if the story was necessary. When they announced that the film was in production (and despite the high quality of each Toy Story film), I couldn’t help doubting whether a fourth installment really was necessary since the third one rounded the franchise off nicely. I am glad to say that there was no need to be in doubt at all. I think that the UK marketing team for Pixar did a brilliant job of not actually giving away too much of the plot which made the film all the more enjoyable to watch and also surprising.

It goes without saying that Tom Hanks and Tim Allen do a fantastic job in their iconic roles as Woody and Buzz, respectively but there are also a great array of new characters that are brought into the fold. My favourite character is the aforementioned Forky. Everything about this little guy is hilarious from how he looks to his physicality to the way he talks and socialises with other toys. He is a fantastic little addition to the Toy Story family and honestly it’s been hilarious seeing how many toys Disney have made of him for extortinate prices despite the fact that his character was literally made from items from a bin. Other characters introduced in this film include Bunny and Ducky, voiced by comedy duo Jordan Peele and Keegan-Michael Key who are also great additions. They are adorable plush teddies who have been waiting three years to be won at the carnival fair. The last toy inclusion to mention is Duke Kaboom, a Canadian action figure voiced by Keanu Reeves. He is a hilarious and sensitive character who speaks passionately about his past owner, Rijon, who got rid of him. We also see the reintroduction of an old toy in this film. Bringing back Bo Peep who has been given a makeover into a strong heroine is a long cry away from her shy, lovestruck self in the first two Toy Story films and has been the cause of complaint to some but rest assured it is done fantastically and subtly to the point where it makes sense with her own storyline. It’s also great for Pixar to show the contextual progression where female characters don’t have to be passive love interests. Bo Peep does a lot of the rescuing in this film and it’s treated no differently to when male characters take action.

It’s easy to imagine that with the addition of so many characters that they don’t have their chance for character growth but the writers have done a great job with balancing this out. Forky and Bo Peep are given the most space for character growth since their stories are central to the plot whereas Ducky, Bunny and Duke are used as comic relief so only their backstories are given. Knowing the importance of the toys in the specific film means that the audience isn’t crammed with too many plotlines that they can’t keep up with. With their being so many new and different characters, it does mean that all of Bonnie’s toys (with the exception of Woody, Buzz and arguably Jessie) may as well have not been brought on the road trip. When Bonnie loses Forky, she doesn’t care that she has numerous other (non-trash made) toys in the RV. They’re just there in the background for the whole film. They didn’t even need to bring in a replacement for Mr. Potatohead as they recycled old lines said by Don Rickles in previous films. This isn’t a bad thing necessarily but it does mean that their importance has been faded out in this (supposedly) final installment. There were many scenes that I enjoyed in this film but if I had to pick one, I would say when Woody and Forky are having their heart to heart after Forky jumps out the RV. Woody tries to make Forky understand the importance of his role as a toy which means Forky has the realisation that he is “Bonnie’s trash”. It’s one of those heart-warming scenes injected with humour which have become synonymous with the Toy Story franchise. Also, any scene with Duke Kaboom in because he is absolutely hilarious and his backstory was heartbreaking to watch.

Another thing to talk about is how amazing the animation is, in particular Bo Peep. The shine and reflective effect of her porcelein is an incredible development from the first film. It makes her look eerie at times but more delicate as well (she is porcelein after all!). When you look back to how she appeared in the first film, the animation doesn’t compare. I’m not dissing the first film because it achieved so much at the time of its release in regards to animation, but celebrating the achievements made since then and seeing that transformation in the span of 24 years is incredible. Also the textures of the plushes and ventriloquist dummies that appear in this film are equally fantastic.

I think that Toy Story 4 was well worth the wait and seemed like the true ending for the franchise. I think it will go on to win the Best Animated Feature at the Oscars next year (to be honest, it’s rare that a Disney film doesn’t win this) and I think it will date well as a film. I think what makes it work so well is that even though it follows on from the trilogy and the franchise, there is a different feel to it altogether because they’re not Andy’s toys anymore. With a new owner comes new changes and this opened up a door for new storylines and motives.

Categories
Uncategorised

Pixar Features Ranking: Films 11-15

This period saw the complete acquisition of Pixar by Disney, giving complete control to the Disney board on what projects should go ahead at Disney. Whereas John Lasseter had stopped sequels and remakes previously, Disney did the opposite at Pixar and wanted to capitalise on the loved characters that Pixar had created. Although with Toy Story 2 they had found success, other franchises were not as lucky and the films were met with lukewarm reviews which was pretty unheard of at Pixar but has sadly become more of the norm now.

If you want to read the other Pixar reviews and ranking you can click the links below:

Films 1-5

Films 6-10

Now without further ado, let’s begin with the reviews and rankings for Pixar films 11-15:

11) Toy Story 3 (2010)

The third segment of Toy Story 3 was built with hype in the months leading up to its release and it certainly didn’t disappoint. Following the toys’ adventure in a daycare centre as Andy heads off to college, Woody, Buzz and co face off against the manipulative Lotso and his henchmen who oppress the “weaker” toys. It’s brilliant and sassy, bringing everything we love about the franchise into an even bigger film. My favourite inclusion is Ken and his dream-house with the scene in which he shows Barbie his vintage clothes collection is clearly so well researched with the materials and textures impeccable as always. The scene where Barbie threatens to rip his clothes has me on edge as we see her ripping each individual thread apart is just as horrific as the now-iconic incinerator scene. Although not quite as good as Toy Story 2 in my opinion (although this is no insult), Toy Story 3 won the franchise its first Best Animated Feature Oscar with ease. Bringing in new toys courtesy of the daycare centre as well as Bonnie’s (the daycare assistant’s daughter) collection which features a Totoro and personal favourite, Mr. Pricklepants, a dramatic hedgehog teddy who loves Shakespearean style acting. Passing the toys onto Bonnie at the end seemed like a fitting ending for the franchise so it is exciting to see how Toy Story 4 will fare and if it will live up to its hype.

12) Cars 2 (2011)

I didn’t go into this film with high hopes because I am not a fan of the franchise and I think that Cars has been the weakest offering in Pixar by a long-shot so I was definitely surprised when they announced a sequel. Pretty much more of the same but with added spies, Lightning McQueen finds himself a love interest in the form of Holley Shiftwell. It’s racing, it’s boring and to be honest Lightning McQueen isn’t an engaging enough character to be the protagonist. I am happy that there is more focus on Mater in this film but he spends most of his screen-time getting berated by McQueen who is so focused on his image and looking cool that it seems the messages he learned from the first film are completely forgotten because of his egotism. I hate to be biased about it but it just doesn’t interest me as a franchise and as much as I try to enjoy these films, I simply struggle to because of how ridiculous the whole concept is.

13) Brave (2012)

Now for a film I was really excited to see in the cinema on its release day. Featuring Pixar’s first princess, Merida, Brave looked to be full of spirit as the princess longs for freedom and to fight the tradition of marriage as is expected of her. In the course of her rebellion, she argues with her mum who is then turned into a bear. This film is an odd because aesthetically, it is stunning and captures Medieval Scotland beautifully but the screenplay is imbalanced and poorly paced. The beginning and ending to this film are brilliantly done but the middle portion just doesn’t seem to fit. It feels as though there was so much focus in establishing Merida’s character and how her character will end up rather than establishing her character and the mum’s character and then developing their relationship in the typical Pixar way, with detail and finesse. The middle portion seems poorly planned and forced, making the film drag and bringing an underwhelming feeling to the audience. The general consensus was the same among critics and audiences who responded with mixed reviews although the film did do well at the box office and subsequently won the Best Animated Feature Oscar although this was in (admittedly) an underwhelming year overall.

14) Monsters University (2013)

The first prequel offered by Pixar was a surprising choice. Monsters University, as implied, follows Mike and Sulley in university and shows how they met and how their friendship developed. It feels formulaic in development, the two dislike each other with Sulley the jock type and Mike as a nerd, the two find common ground before using their strengths to win the “Scare Games”. It’s not a terrible film by any means but it is very cliche and feels underwhelming for a Pixar film. Although it received positive reviews, it doesn’t hold a light against Monsters, Inc. because it’s clear that this is a film that Disney has ordered to be made rather than an organic creation. In Sulley and Mike’s fraternity, there are a collection of cliche characters. Although basic, my favourite is Art, the creative hyper artsy type who is bright purple and rolls around super fast and likes shiny things. I’m glad that they chose to create a film set in a different environment in the monster universe because this does make it far removed from the original and therefore the impact of Monsters, Inc. hasn’t be tainted.

15) Inside Out (2015)

After several underwhelming offerings, Pixar appeared to get back into their stride with this masterpiece. The question the creators asked: what if feelings had feelings? The result is a brilliant portrayal of the emotions living inside a teenage girl, Riley after her parents force the family to move to San Francisco from their cosy life in Michigan. As Riley struggles to fit in, her major emotions: Joy, Anger, Disgust, Panic and Sadness also struggle to adjust to the situation. This sees Sadness outcast by Joy and the others which causes an imbalance when Joy and Sadness are accidentally sucked from “headquarters” and into Riley’s mind. Although the plot may appear simple, a teenage girl struggles to fit in, the Emotions’ journey is actually a complex one as they learn that they need each other to thrive in the environment. Joy learns that Riley needs Sadness in order to feel those moments of joy and that this isn’t always a bad thing even if it doesn’t feel nice in the moment. Although the most dense of the Pixar films, it isn’t without its lighter moments which are provided by Anger, Disgust and Panic, who are struggling to run headquarters with Joy. I don’t think Inside Out could have been made 20 years ago as people find it hard to talk about real and complex feelings, especially in a children’s film but now there is a wider awareness on mental health and the importance of this in young children. It is a film that can engage that younger audience, even if they don’t understand everything and as they grow, they will learn to understand it. Also, the inclusion of childhood imaginary friend, Bing Bong shows the importance of the child imagination from a young age as he helps Joy and Sadness find their way back to headquarters. It’s a brilliant film that will have you roaring with laughter one moment and then sobbing the next, making it as emotionally complex and rewarding as the film itself.

This ranking was a little easier because there were a few under-performers in my opinion. I think that Pixar thrives when able to produce original content because Pixar have established themselves as the innovator rather than the follower so it’s a shame that Disney are forcing the same structure on the studio as itself by creating sequels and prequels.

Here is my ranking:

1) Up (2009)

2) WALL-E (2008)

3) Toy Story 2 (1999)

4) Inside Out (2015)

5) Ratatouille (2007)

6) Toy Story 3 (2010)

7) Monsters, Inc. (2001)

8) Finding Nemo (2003)

9) The Incredibles (2004)

10) Toy Story (1995)

11) A Bug’s Life (1998)

12) Brave (2012)

13) Monsters University (2013)

14) Cars (2006)

15) Cars 2 (2011)

The next post will look at the last bunch of offerings that includes even more sequels but also gives a couple of originals so let’s hope this batch fares a little better than this bunch.

What do you think of the ranking now? Is it a surprise? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

The Sworn Enemy in ‘The Master’

“If you figure a way to live without serving a master, any master, then let the rest of us know, will you? For you’d be the first person in the history of the world.”

  • Lancaster Dodd, The Master (dir. by Paul Thomas Anderson, 2012)

philip-seymour-hoffman-the-master

By the time this statement is spoken, we have seen the relationship between ex-Naval officer, Freddie Quell (Joaquin Phoenix) and Master of the Cause, Lancaster Dodd (Philip Seymour Hoffman) flourish and burn. The scene in which this exchange happens is in London. Freddie has travelled the Atlantic to face off The Master once more. On entering The Cause’s headquarters, he is judged by those who know him and ignored by those who do. There is no physical conflict, no shouting, only two men who are saddened by the demise of their friendship and the realisation that they can never see each other again. The Master is the head of The Cause, a cult that believes they are spirits living in a vessel and once life ends in one vessel, they simply move on to the next. Dodd’s mission is essentially one that lasts for eternity. Freddie staggers in a drunken state onto Dodd’s boat after accidentally poisoning a man with moonshine he had made. Freddie is an ex-marine, unemployed, sex-addicted alcoholic, making him the perfect challenge for his new methods to engage with past vessels. Completely unhinged and uninfluenced by society, Freddie refuses to be reined in by the restrictions put to him by Dodd and his wife, Peggy (Amy Adams) resulting in the collapse of the American branch of the Cause and forcing Dodd to relocate to England.

The Master is regarded one of the best films of the 21st century so far and is one of my favourite films ever made (I have written a review which you can read here). Set in 1950, the film follows ex-marine, Freddie Quell, as he becomes associated with the Cause, a cult that believes that the spirit transcends the body (or vessel as is referred to) and simply changes after death. Although the film is set in a particular place at a particular time, its subject matter actually makes the film seem timeless. The characters wear clothes as expected of the time and the treatment of women and sex is reflective of the time but the sentiment transcends its period, much like the spirit, and can be argued as relevant in the 21st century. Of course, this film was made in the 21st century so it has the advantage of hindsight but I think Paul Thomas Anderson’s script captures the idea of the slave and master perfectly. The Cause is portrayed as a small religion, a friendly group of people who channel their past selves in order to eventually see where man began. Freddie is confused by everything and only wants to drink and have sex but these activities are rejected and he becomes uncomfortable and agitated. It is as though he is young again as we see flashbacks of him with his first love, Doris, before he leaves for war. There is hope in the young Freddie of returning home and marrying Doris but this dream is shattered on his arrival as he finds out she is married with two children. The Cause gives Freddie a purpose to live by hoping to engage with his inner self and control it, thus allowing him to become fully subservient to The Master.

master_finalshot

The ending brings the film full circle as Freddie has sex with a woman he meets in a pub and thinks about his time on the beach after the war, waiting to go home. The final shot is him sleeping beside a female form made of sand. It is peaceful and serene as Freddie appears comfortable. He has become “the first person in the history of the world” to live without serving a Master. He is the free spirit that Dodd achieves to ultimately control, the “sworn enemy” as he puts it.

Categories
Uncategorised

The Heart in Studio Ghibli

“Many of my movies have strong female leads- brave, self-sufficient girls that don’t think twice about fighting for what they believe with all their heart. They’ll need a friend, or a supporter, but never a savior. Any woman is just as capable of being a hero as any man.”

Hayao Miyazaki

“I do not make films primarily for children. I make them for the child in all of us, whether he be six or sixty. Call the child innocence.”

Walt Disney

1ee27bfc386a1554cd11df8ba3e5165b1a6a035f_hq

I have previously written a post on Studio Ghibli giving a brief overview on why I love their films so much (you can read that here) as well as a post on women’s voice in film and the importance of strong female characters and female filmmakers (which you can read here). Thinking about these two posts separately merged together in my mind because some of the strongest female protagonists in film can be found in the offerings from Studio Ghibli. The characters are mainly young girls who are thrown into situations that test their strength and maturity, each time providing us with realistic and organic character growth. In a climate where women behind and in front of the camera is being looked at under a microscopic lens with every line and gesture analysed by critics and audience alike, Studio Ghibli feels like a pioneer that has been pulling off the strong female character for decades. Admittedly, behind the camera, there are little to no women at the top of the board. No woman has ever directed or written a Ghibli film; however, their strong female characters have been gracing our screen ever since the release of Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind in 1984. As I previously mentioned, no woman has ever directed or written a Ghibli film so there is room for improvement and diversity at the top but what we have been presented with thus far seems to be a more diverse and varied on the female perspective in an environment where their strength doesn’t feel forced. Miyazaki’s statement above appears to read as a mantra or a basis for creating his female characters. In three sentences he has already captured an image of an individual who can fight but is also capable of sensitivity and equality among her peers. His definition of strength being “brave” and “self-sufficient” shows how a strong character doesn’t come from difficult physical activity necessarily but from following what you believe and fighting for that as well as pointing out the importance of female independence. It’s unrealistic to imagine a strong female character who in the end can’t even look after herself because she’s a woman.

NAUSICAA_01_NVW1012945

You may be wondering why I have also included a Walt Disney quote above. Well aside from the fact that Disney distribute the Ghibli films in America, I think that Ghibli follow the same ethos as Disney in this respect by using young characters to make the films aspirational for children and inspirational for adults. Ghibli films are more dense than Disney films and are fearless in exploring darker issues such as war and death in a way that translates well to a global audience of all ages. The “child innocence” that Disney is talking about is a willingness to use film as a medium to discuss the bigger issues which I think Ghibli achieves effortlessly. My favourite film¸ Castle in the Sky (1986) veers on the more childish side of their films and yet it is one of the more mature topically, looking at the issues of man vs nature and corruption in authority as well as incorporating antiheroes and villains disguised as heroes. Ghibli never patronises the audience and yet is perfectly watchable for young children whilst never feeling like a lecture for its older audience. In regards to “child innocence”, Ghibli are showing young girls specifically that they are capable of being the hero without needing a man to save them. It may seem trivial to ingrain this belief into the mind of a four year old but the films we watch as young children tend to follow and influence our own morals as we grow up.

I think it’s also important to note the consistent high standard that the films themselves hold. Of course some have received mixed or negative reviews but the majority of offerings (particularly those from Miyazaki and Takahata) have been embraced as modern classics with Spirited Away (2002) winning the studio the Academy Award for Best Animated Feature. I think they hold an important part of film, not only in the animation world, but in general because it is so rare that a non-English studio has such a huge global following in the West which is a huge achievement. Their stories translate well globally no matter how bizarre the stories and the creatures in them may seem and it is because of that relatibility that the female characters have specifically. Their bravery and independence are a welcoming break from the usual Hollywood heartbreak/makeup trope that the female audience is overly familiar with.

39955

“Brave”

Bravery comes in many forms in the Ghibli universe. There are the female characters who act as traditional heroes such as Nausicaä in Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind and San in Princess Mononoke (1997) who protect their families and environment from the evil threat of mankind who aims to destroy nature. Nausicaä is a dystopian film based in a post-apocalyptic world where humans live in small villages and giant insects rule large vasts of land and jungles. Nausicaä is the princess of her village and has the ability to communicate with the insects and aims to make peace with them. Despite their supposed roles as enemies, Nausicaä understands the bigger picture and uses her influence and morals to fight against those who want to burn the jungle. Princess Mononoke is a Medieval film that follows a young prince called Ashitaka who is cursed by a Boar God after he kills it. He encounters wolf God Moro and his companion, the human San (also known as Princess Mononoke) and together they fight the industrial Irontown, a small village that is dangerously mining into the forest of the Gods, killing the nature as they go. Both films are set in opposite time spans and yet they tell almost the same story. Both women have an outsider male companion who acts as a sidekick and supporter without ever overshadowing the female. Although both films do hint at couplings, there is nothing inherently overtly sexual or forced, San is particularly uncomfortable with being physically close to Ashitaka at first. Both films delve into technology and war. Even Princess Mononoke, set in Medieval Japan, has weapons that feel oddly futuristic in the form of large iron harpoons made from the materials from the mine whereas Nausicaa allowed for more imagination due to its dystopic setting. It makes use of hovercrafts and spaceships with laser guns to boot but it doesn’t feel out of place. Both films have women working in the war itself and operating the machinery with no issue. Ashitaka even struggles to keep up with the women who run the iron mill. Lady Eboshi, leader of Irontown, is a brilliant villain as she is just as complex as the protagonists. She genuinely believes that what she is doing is for the good of the village and wants to provide a decent life, particularly for the women. Her greed for power is subsequently what thwarts this as she aims to dominate the forest and mine as much as possible. It is this character conflict that allows us to view Lady Eboshi as more than a simple evil figure like the Evil Stepmothers in Snow White or Cinderella. Her motive is to gain power for herself but she also has motives for her people as well. This is what makes Ghibli women much more complex but at the same time, realistic and gives the audience an extra layer into character growth.

There are also characters who approach bravery in a more peaceful manner such as Sheeta (Castle in the Sky) and Chihiro (Spirited Away), both films directed by Miyazaki. Both characters are young girls who are thrown into adult situations. Sheeta is on the run from government officials as they try to steal her precious necklace that is the key to finding legendary floating castle, Laputa whereas Chihiro finds herself working in a bathhouse for spirits when her parents are turned into pigs after feasting on the food for the spirits. Castle in the Sky looks at how government officials would use the castle for military purposes to rule the world. Similarly, No Face in Spirited Away manipulates through his riches and shows the corrupt nature of the structure in the bathhouse. Money is seen as an evil entity in bothas Pazu’s job working in the mine is under threat from no products found to sell, whereas the gold No Face throws around is seen as vulgar and pathetic as the adult characters scramble for nuggets. The gold pieces hold no significance to Chihiro and that means No Face has no power over her. She cannot be ruled by him because he cannot buy her. Sheeta was raised on a farm by her grandmother and Chihiro raised in modern day Japanese suburbs. Neither one has encountered a violent situation nor would know how to fight or defend themselves but their determination to do what is right and fight the powers that oppress them allow them the growth to use their wits. We see Sheeta, a princess, take on the chores on the pirate ship ran by Dola and her crew. She cooks and cleans and is unphased by the attention Dola’s sons are giving her (it’s a bit weird that adult men are fawning over a child but that’s for another time). She has a natural kinship with the robots that inhabit Laputa and with nature in general. Her ancestry gives her that connection and it gives her the strength to protect the castle without the use of violence. Chihiro, on the other hand, must travel across the spirit world to find a way to get home. The villains in Spirited Away aren’t violent themselves (with the exception of No Face) and so Chihiro isn’t under a physical threat. The beginning of the film shows Chihiro dissastified with her parents’ decision to move away. She finds the idea of change difficult and this is shown as she sulks in the back of the car shortly before her parents are turned into pigs. Spirited Away is a film that is all about change. It’s about Chihiro’s ability to live a different life and gain perspective. Her identity is literally taken from her as bathhouse boss, Yubaba, employs her and steals her name, renaming her Sen. It’s a horrifying moment as she is a child with no identity but the film shows her growth into a more mature person and how she is all the better for the experiences in the spirit world.

laputa 4.png

“Self-sufficient”

Ghibli’s exploration into identity and independence is achieved best from the perspective of the teenage girl trying to discover herself in a society that has certain expectations for her. One of the most iconic Ghibli characters, Kiki (Kiki’s Delivery Service 1988) is a clumsy witch who struggles to fit into mainstream society. She finds her place when she uses her magic for a delivery service, delivering goods from the local bakery to the townspeople in order to save the business from closure. Hayao Miyazaki’s Kiki’s Delivery Service is one of Ghibli’s lighter offerings, much like My Neighbor Totoro and doesn’t have the dark complex issues that other films have. However, it is all about the teenage girl experience and how she has to find her identity in a society that has certain expectations for women. The village itself leads a more traditional lifestyle with men as active and the women take passive roles; however, Kiki becomes self-sufficient when she fights this hierarchy. Her male friend, Tombo, admires Kiki for her magic and at no point is threatened by her independence. Kiki’s Delivery Service features a flipped relationship in which the female is active and the male passive, again, without it feeling forced or a major talking point. When Kiki becomes depressed after feeling intimidated by Tombo’s friends, she becomes depressed and is unable to use her powers or understand Jiji, her cat. It is only when she sees Tombo in danger as he hangs from an aircraft that she finds her purpose and can fly again to save him. Some people may argue that it’s following the old stereotype that a woman only has love as a motivation but the significance of this scene comes from the fact that she rescues him. This never happens in regular Hollywood offerings never mind a family animation. Kiki becomes the hero of her own story and reward and validation that is more significant doesn’t come from Tombo, the male protagonist, but from Kiki herself as she finds her own identity. This is also the case in Yoshifumi Kondō’s only directorial effort, Whisper of the Heart (1995) before his untimely death in 1998. Following high-achieving, 14 year-old Shizuku, an avid writer who loves to translate Western songs into Japanese and her encounter with Seiji, an aspiring luthier (someone who makes and repairs stringed instruments). They work together to create a story about a mysterious cat statue called The Baron that Shizuku found in Seiji’s grandfather’s antique shop. Like Kiki’s Delivery ServiceWhisper of the Heart is a film about identity and independence. As Shizuku delves deeper into her creative world when writing the story on The Baron, her grades drop and she becomes lazy and sluggish. Her need for independence arrives at this low point as she realises what she wants to do with her life and knows that she must work hard at school to achieve it. She doesn’t allow her life to continuously slump to appease Seiji but rather than threaten Seiji, he in fact expresses his admiration for Shizuku for taking control of her own life and declares his love for her. The self-sufficient female isn’t punished for her strength but rewarded. Like Kiki’s Delivery Service, Shizuku’s independence comes from herself. She does receive validation from the male protagonist but this feels secondary and insignificant compared to the love that she has for herself at the end of the film.

Just as there are films that show the success of female independence, Ghibli have also given us films that show the true battle for female self-sufficiency. Isao Takahata’s beautiful swansong, The Tale of the Princess Kaguya, is a retelling of the Japanese folklore about a young girl found in a bamboo stalk and her ascension to royalty and the struggle she has with this lifestyle. The aesthetic of the film is traditional Japanese ink and is visually a stunning film to watch with beautiful bright colours from the cherry blossoms and kimonos combined with the natural materials used to create this film. This is combined with darker undertones such as depression and the loss of identity as Princess Kaguya is forced to pick a husband despite not even wanting to marry. At first she is lured in by the clothes and the materialistic lifestyle with the giant palace but the palace soon grows into a prison and she struggles to adjust to this new life under the watchful eye of her governess who rebuts her desire for fun and laughter. The most poignant scene in this film comes near the end of the party where Kaguya is forced to sit behind a curtain and is forbidden to socialise with anyone, except for the potential suitors who talk from the other side of the curtain. Layered with multiple kimonos, she runs through the palace to get away and sheds each kimono off layer by layer, throwing them on the road as she runs in the full light of the moon. She is literally rejecting her role in society by casting the clothing away. The materials do not hold the same magic as they once did and much like Kiki and Shizuki, she realises that wants to be free. The end of the film sees Kaguya returning to her original home, the Moon, in a scene that is painful to watch as the memories of her life on Earth are forgotten and her parents look on heartbroken as they watch their daughter whisked away. Kaguya was unable to find her solace on Earth but her struggle is important to take away. The film exploits the impossible expectations thrusted onto women and how they aren’t treated as humans most of the time. Kaguya’s discomfort mainly came from the daily practice of makeup and being physically restricted when in the presence of a man. The Tale of the Princess Kaguya is one of the darkest films that Ghibli have released and I think it was also a real brave offering because it openly looked at depression in a realistic way. Kaguya wasn’t able to gain her independence on Earth but it is a brilliantly inspirational film for the young girls watching who wish to be self-sufficient.

thumb-1920-831831

“The child in all of us”

Ghibli films are often marketed as children films due to the animation style and constant comparisons with Disney; however, Studio Ghibli has a large adult following and its understandable to see why. Every film has underlying mature contexts that children won’t understand. Issues such as illness and death are prevalent in many of their films and even though they are suitable for children to watch, they are oftentimes heartbreaking for adults to view as well. The prime example for this would be young sisters Satsuki and May in Miyazaki’s My Neighbor Totoro. Following the girls and their father as they move to be closer to their ill mother, My Neighbor Totoro is often viewed as the most iconic Ghibli film (Totoro’s profile is the Studio’s logo). The girls encounter the spirits by live in the surrounding forest including the soot spirits that initially live in the house and eventually the giant Totoro, a lovable spirit who lives in a tree near the house. He reveals himself to Mei first then Satsuki, the latter being an iconic scene in which Satsuki lends him an umbrella in the torrential rain before he boards another iconic character in the form of the Catbus. This film is a favourite among children and adults alike because it displays the creative talent and imagination the Studio have. On the surface it is a lovable and cute film that is brings a smile to your face but there is an undercurrent through the film which is the the plot regarding the mother. She’s rarely onscreen but the adult audience is aware that she exists and she is severely ill in hospital. It seems that she may even die at some point but because the film is told through the perspective of the two girls, we don’t encounter mother unless they visit her at hospital. As the girls, particularly Mei, are very young, they don’t fully understand the situation and so they act as if everything is normal and enjoy their adventures with Totoro and company. It’s this child innocence that gives the film its light and allows it to avoid being full of darkness and sadness. Their innocence prevents the reality from creeping in and allows their imagination to soar.

Ghibli’s most adult film to date is one that sees child innocence stripped away during the course of World War II. Grave of the Fireflies (1988) is Isao Takahata’s war tale about siblings, Seita and his younger sister, Setsuko and is the Studio’s most heartbreaking film to date and probably one of the hardest films to watch overall due to its explicit portrayal of Japan during wartime. The film opens with Seita’s death as he meets the spirit of his sister in the afterlife before proceeding into a flashback which shows the story of their demise. When their home is bombed, Seita must take his sister to their aunt’s house in the countryside for shelter. Eventually they have to leave to the abuse they are subjected to and are by themselves. Seita himself is only a teenager and both siblings are forced to adapt to the environment around them. Setsuko takes solace in the fireflies that flutter around only to find them dead the next day. The scene when she buries it is when she questions and begins to understand the concept of life and death, asking Seita why their mother had to die. It’s this moment when Setsuko is stripped of her child innocence and is forced to adapt to a very adult situation. The film does not treat her kindly because she is a child. Setsuko is subjected to starvation which eventually leads to her graphic and heartbreaking death which sees Seita cremating her ashes with her favourite straw doll. The size of the wicker basket holding her is tiny and showcases the cruelty of war. Takahata has denied claims that the film acts as an anti-war piece but it is difficult to view it as anything else as it is the loss of that child innocence and the loss of life at such a young age which shows the true cost of war. It’s a profound film that is extremely difficult to watch but it is important and shows how fearless the studio was even in its early days.

grave-of-the-fireflies-2

Studio Ghibli is a company that refuses to conform to the expectations held by mainstream releases. Instead, it remains a pioneer for film in general and continues to release films that explore complex female characters who are brave and self-sufficient. The hearts of their films come from the girls and women who choose to fight for what they believe in and the journey they have to discover what they are capable of. The characters don’t always achieve their end goals but the growth that they go through shows their resilience and strength. One word that cannot be used to describe the female characters in Ghibli is weak because each character has their complexities and flaws but they also have their morals and heart. Without the female characters, the standard of Studio Ghibli films would not be what they are today and in fact, Ghibli probably wouldn’t even exist. The first major character to be introduced (although not under the Ghibli name technically) was Nausicaä, suggesting that having “brave” and “self-sufficient” female heroes has always been at the heart of the Studio Ghibli ethos. After all, “any woman is just as capable of being a hero as any man”.

Categories
Uncategorised

Disney Animated Classics: Numbers 36-40 Ranking

Now we’re on the end of the Disney Renaissance period and this subsequently lead to a dark time in the Disney repertoire as money seemed to become the main motivation for film production rather than the artistry or vision which Disney had wanted to push. It begins with the attempt to better Fantasia with a bigger budget but little imagination in Fatasia 2000 and this rut continues for the next decade so it will be on a couple of blogs.

As always, here are the links to the previous posts in case you need to catch up

Films 1-5

Films 6-10

Films 11-15

Films 16-20

Films 21-25

Films 26-30

Films 31-35

As ever, let’s get on with the reviews for films 36-40:

36) Mulan (1998)

Taking inspiration from the legendary woman who disguised as a male soldier so her disabled father didn’t have to fight in a war, Mulan is a story of courage and strength. In line with the Disney brand, darker themes are outbalanced by lighter entertainment in the form of her animal sidekick, Mushu (voiced superbly by Eddie Murphy). The film is home to my favourite Disney song “Make a Man Out of You” which I always belt out whenever the film is on (and admittedly, even if the film isn’t on). It’s not without its flaws as like its predecessors, Mulan has a tendency to fall into an array of Chinese, Japanese and Korean stereotypes just to name a few. It feels like a mesh of cultures rather than a positive fixation on Chinese culture. This could be why the film wasn’t successful in China. However, for all its faults, there is something about this film that I truly love. Mulan is not a typical Disney princess. She disobeys her father’s orders and is instantly an outsider in her community. She simply does not fit in. It is only when she impersonates a soldier that she finds her true destiny as a hero and saves China from the Hun invasion. Of course the film follows the traditional Disney trope of a love story between her and Captain Shang but this feels secondary to her mission in a way that love stories haven’t taken centre stage in Disney before. Granted that it is far from a perfect feminist portrayal but it is a huge improvement from the other Disney princess offerings that Disney were producing at the time.

37) Tarzan (1999)

Tarzan is the first Disney film I ever saw in the cinema and I remember being swept away on my booster seat by the animation and adventure this film brought. The songs (written by Phil Collins) are absolutely fantastic and the sequences of Tarzan riding through the trees are spectacular. The story of the boy raised by gorillas in the jungle who befriends English travelers, including the ever-so-posh Jane who he falls in love with. The film definitely has its highlights such as the scene in which Turk, Tarzan’s gorilla best friend and company break the goods in the camp the travelers had set up. The antagonist in this film comes in the form of Clayton, a hunter who has arrived with Jane and her father and aims to hunt down the gorillas. The climatic scene is tense and was scary to watch as a child as we watch Clayton’s demise in a fairly gruesome manner. The film does have its share of mild violence and the audience is shown this in the opening scene when Tarzan’s parents are killed by a jaguar. The animation team takes advantage of the details that are allowed in modern animation that wasn’t available when films like The Jungle Book was being made.

38) Fantasia 2000 (2000)

Ringing in the new millennium with a revived look at one of Disney’s most iconic films. Fantasia 2000 is bigger than its counterpart boasting a massive budget of $80-85 million; however, when watching the film, it seems that its only goal is to surpass the legacy of the original. It seems to be a film about celebrity and hype rather than heart and substance which the original has in spades. Instead of one narrator who briefly discusses each piece in between segments, there are celebrity introductions such as Quincy Jones and Angela Lansbury and they tend to go on for a while. Fantasia 2000 also features “The Sorcerer’s Apprentice” from the original but the other segments are completely new. Following the original’s concept of, abstract, character driven and plot driven stories, it seems that Fantasia 2000 is a poor copy of its predecessor and feels a bit pointless in creation. This isn’t to say it is bad but much like The Rescuers Down Under, it seems like a rehash of a classic that doesn’t need fixing in the first place.

39) Dinosaur (2000)

Another film that I remember vividly seeing in the cinema and loving to pieces. For the time it was released, the animation was really progressive and looked stunning, particularly the meteor shower scene. Inspired by the evolution segment in Fantasia and following the dinosaurs following the meteor shower and the fight to survive, we follow Aladar and his search for a new home with his lemur friends. Watching it when I was younger was a fun experience. It’s a simple story with basic characters but you can tell the huge budget went on the style rather than substance. This is where the flaws come in watching it as an adult. I’m now at a point where a film has to really be revolutionary in style and look fantastic to make up for basic characters but the animation now looks dated and sadly doesn’t fix the poor writing or character development. It is such a disappointment because I enjoyed it so much as a kid and re-watching the films now, I actually find that I enjoy it the least. The film

40) The Emperor’s New Groove (2000)

A favourite among the millennial audience, The Emperor’s New Groove is the hilarious story of the selfish Emperor Kuzco who is turned into a llama by his advisor, Yzma. He awakes in a village he threatened to knock down for a pool house and together with village chief, Pacha, he has to make his way home and stop Yzma from ruling the kingdom. The kingdom isn’t specifically named but it appears to be a mesh of Aztec and Mayan culture which makes it similar to Mulan in that respect; however, because the era and place isn’t specified, this aspect isn’t made as obvious to the audience in the way that Mulan was. The animation reflects Aztec art with sharp lines and regal colouring, golds and purple decorate the palace in abundance. It’s a bizarre film that sees the sarcasm turned up to a ten and the quirky humour can be off-putting to some but it seems to be a real hit with millennials. I love the writing in this film and how bizarre it is and a big special mention to Eartha Kitt for her amazing voice work as villainess, Yzma. One part evil and another part theatrical, Yzma is one of the most underrated villains in Disney. Accompanied by her sidekick, Kronk, she is even more detached from the public than Kuzco which makes for some comical moments in the film such as when Pacha’s family prank them both.

The list is getting huge now and I’m surprised with myself by where some of these have placed. Not long to go now until we’re up to date with the Disney catalogue with the newest offering, Frozen 2 being released later this year. It’ll be interesting to see where that will place. Now onto the important part of the blog!

Here is my ranking:

1) Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937)

2) Fantasia (1940)

3) Beauty and the Beast (1991)

4) Sleeping Beauty (1959)

5) Bambi (1942)

6) The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh (1977)

7) The Lion King (1994)

8) Mulan (1998)

9) The Little Mermaid (1989)

10) Alice in Wonderland (1951)

11) Aladdin (1992)

12) The Aristocats (1971)

13) One Hundred and One Dalmatians (1961)

14) The Emperor’s New Groove (2000)

15) The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1996)

16) Peter Pan (1953)

17) The Three Caballeros (1945)

18) Pinocchio (1940)

19) Pocahontas (1995)

20) Tarzan (1999)

21) Dumbo (1941)

22) Hercules (1997)

23) The Black Cauldron (1985)

24) The Great Mouse Detective (1986)

25) The Jungle Book (1967)

26) The Sword in the Stone (1963)

27) Cinderella (1950)

28) The Rescuers (1977)

29) Robin Hood (1973)

30) Oliver & Company (1988)

31) Lady and the Tramp (1955)

32) The Fox and the Hound (1981)

33) Fun and Fancy Free (1947)

34) The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr. Toad (1949)

35) Saludos Amigos (1943)

36) Melody Time (1948)

37) Fantasia 2000 (2000)

38) The Rescuers Down Under (1990)

39) Make Mine Music (1946)

40) Dinosaur (2000)

Tune in for my next post where I will be delving further into the dark period of Disney where we look at films that were critically and commercially panned across the board. These films are not among Disney’s highlights but they soon make way for a new wave of modern masterpieces in the same vein of the Disney Renaissance.

What do you think of the ranking? What would be your number one choice? Let me know in the comments !