Categories
Uncategorised

Annette (2021)

One of the big films to come out of this year’s Cannes Film Festival was Annette, the English language debut from French director Leos Carax. Following the relationship between controversial stand-up comedian, Henry McHenry (Adam Driver) and famous soprano, Ann Defrasnoux (Marion Cotillard), Annette is an epic in terms of the various themes it explores as well as the cinematic scope. Running at a staggering 140 minutes, Annette features music written by Ron and Russell Mael of Sparks who cowrote the script alongside Carax and the result is a mind-blowingly wonderful experience that is unlike any film you have ever seen.

Annette sees Carax return to film after 2012’s Holy Motors and is his first English language film. What is fantastic about Carax’s approach to the film is how ironic and aware it is from the opening number all the way to the end. We are informed that we are watching a performance through the medium of performance and it is this layering of dark comedy and contrast that saw Carax win the Best Director award at this year’s Cannes Film Festival. On the surface, Annette may seem like a lot in terms of its various genres and themes but Carax handles it with ease and allows the film to develop organically. The script by Carax and Sparks takes us through a variety of different themes with some taking more prominence than others. Arguably, the most important theme observed in the film is celebrity, how distorting fame can be and how a public persona can overwhelm a person’s psyche to the point where reality and fantasy collide. Just in the way Annette plays with different themes, it is Carax’s way of merging musical, drama, romance and dark comedy that makes it exciting and unpredictable to watch.

Adam Driver delivers a career-best performance as Henry McHenry. From the first set that we see, McHenry never allows the audience in to what he is thinking and what his motives are. Driver’s performance is extremely visceral and layered as he fully encompasses McHenry on a physical and emotional level. Immediately grabbing the audience’s attention, McHenry lives for controversy and aspires to have his name in lights while simultaneously denouncing fame in his act. As Ann’s star rises and his wains, we begin to see McHenry’s public persona and his real personality begin to clash as he struggles to regain control of his public life which then filters into his personal life.

Playing Ann Defrasnoux is Oscar winner Marion Cotillard who is breathtaking as the soprano on the rise. Compared to McHenry’s unpredictable and controversial comedian who improvises his set, Defrasnoux is poised and controlled which is shown through her repeated performances that are lauded among critics and the public. Ann is more reserved than Henry and this seems to go in her favour as Henry begins to implode in his career while her career goes from strength to strength. Cotillard brings her best performance in years and again showing what makes her one of the great living actresses. Her turn as Ann is one filled with sorrow and hope simultaneously as she strives to do what is best for Annette and her relationship with Henry but as it begins to fall apart, she realises that there isn’t much that she can do.

Simon Helberg provides a fantastic supporting turn as The Accompanist, Ann’s pianist and aspiring conductor. Helberg is in it briefly throughout the first half but really comes into the film’s main plot in the second half where he is able to bring a beautifully nuanced performance that is full of bittersweet melancholy. His love and affection for Annette is clear as he reluctantly agrees to take care of her while Henry spends all of the money on his party lifestyle. Helberg may not be in a lot of the film’s 140 minute running time but he makes the most of it.

As Annette is a musical then it is important to discuss the music and songs. Written by Ron and Russell Mael of Sparks, the music is a key component in the film in many different ways rather than simply telling the story through song. We learn more about the characters through their style of music and how they sing with the main contrast being Henry’s aggressive rock-fuelled anthems that incorporate his audience and Ann’s operatic performances in which she is observed by the audience as she sings by herself. In a way, the music serves to tell us more about the protagonists and acts as a way to foreshadow in both a literal and figurative sense.

Overall, Annette is a unique film that truly subverts every misconception that comes with the musical genre. As musicals are seeing a resurgence in recent years and many stage shows are being brought to the silver screen, Annette is a shining example of the musical’s place in modern cinema thanks to its originality and complexity. Musicals are often viewed as an accessible art form but it’s the film’s reluctance to let the audience in that makes it such a uniquely challenging and rewarding film to watch. Thoroughly deserving of the praise it is receiving, Annette may not be an easy film to digest but it gives the audience plenty to think about and discuss once the credits have finished rolling and that is the sign of truly great cinema.

What did you think of Annette? Let me know in the comments below!

Annette is available to watch in cinemas now!

Categories
Uncategorised

You Were Never Really Here (2017)

Lynne Ramsay’s You Were Never Really Here follows hitman Joe who specialises in retrieving young girls from the clutches of underground paedophiles and trafficking. He is tasked by a New York senator to retrieve his daughter, Nina (Ekaterina Samsonov), who has been kidnapped and to eliminate those who took her by the most violent means possible. The film premiered in the main competition at Cannes FIlm Festival in 2017 where it became one of the most widely discussed films and won two awards for Best Screenplay for Ramsay and Best Actor for Phoenix. It’s rare to see a film win more than one award at Cannes so the hype for the film was huge. From the offset, the film doesn’t hold back in its themes and violence.

The direction is executed with a cat and mouse feel. The camera trailing through Joe’s eyes as he hunts for the perpetrators and their accomplices. What Ramsay does so well is being able to use the protagonist’s perspective as the audience’s entry into the film. Even in scenes when Joe is doing menial tasks like cleaning or singing with his elderly mother, we get a glimpse into the two different lives he has. Ramsay’s screenplay is incredible and tight, managing to create a fully realised character in its 90 minute runtime. The screenplay is written around the character of Joe and the outside context such as politics is only touched on lightly when introduced to joe in an organic way. Despite using multiple locations, the film still has that claustophobic tone throughout. Like previous films by Ramsay, the film heavily relies on its imagery rather than dialogue to tell the story. This works particularly well for You Were Never Really Here as a lot of the scenes only contain Joe and so scenes filled with dialogue would result in an unnatural and jarring experience. 

Phoenix’s performance as anticipated is more than deserving of the praise received. Joe is unapologetically violent, trauamtised from childhood and yet he displays affection, especially towards his mother and Nina. Joe’s troubled state of mind is displayed from the beginning as we see him self-suffocating with a plastic bag in order to cope with the flashbacks and trauma in his life. Throughout the film, Ramsay gives us brief glimpses into Joe’s backstory but doesn’t overdo it in a way that the film is anchored down by it. Phoenix’s performance is subtly expressive and he allows himself to go to a place that is uncomfortable and disconcerting, resulting in a character that is highly unpredictable and yet so commanding of the audience’s attention. In my previous post where I discuss my top 5 performances by Phoenix (which you can read here), I have included You Were Never Really Here because I think it is one of the prime examples where the actor truly emcompasses everything about the character.For the score, Ramsay recruits Jonny Greenwood for the second time after her 2011 film We Need to Talk About Kevin. Like Joe’s character, the score flits between intense pieces with a strong and consistent beat which are usually played when he is on the job and more natural and flowing pieces which provide a backing track for scenes with Nina and his mother. The track, “Tree Strings”, which is played as Joe buries his mother is such a poignant moment and the music elevates the scene by assisting in his ephiphany to rescue Nina from her kidnappers. Greenwood is more widely known for his collaborations with Paul Thomas Anderson but his scores for both We Need to Talk About Kevin and You Were Never Really Here assist in elevating and excuting Ramsay’s vision to perfection.

Ramsay is one of the best female directors working in the industry today. She consistently brings out performances that are career-defining such as Phoenix in You Were Never Really Here and Tilda Swinton in We Need to Talk About Kevin. She has a clear vision and isn’t afraid to delve into any topic, particularly those centred around children. The ending to You Were Never Really Here isn’t the all-rounded happy ending you would want from a film that explores child sex trafficking, but Ramsay’s choice to give it the ending that it does have highlights the reality that these children face. Ramsay’s ability to write strong characters is in another league. Her characters aren’t particularly likeable but that doesn’t matter. The characters are the driving force of the film and the fact that they aren’t completely relatable or likeable only serves to add another layer of depth. I think because of this that this makes You Were Never Really Here an outstanding inclusion in Ramsay’s filmography and why it was so successful upon release.

What do you think of You Were Never Really Here? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Why Parasite’s win is important

Going into the 92nd Academy Awards, it seemed that pretty much every category was a lock. Joaquin Phoenix was favoured to take home the Best Actor gong for Joker, Renee Zellweger winning Best Actress for Judy and Sam Mendes was the strong favourite to win Best Director for 1917 with the latter ultimately winning Best Picture. How much the Academy surprised us then when the Best Director trophy was awarded to Bong Joon-ho for Parasite and then his film won the Best Picture award, beating the odds. Personally I was very happy as I had placed a bet on Parasite to win so there was a monetary reward for myself but the happiness goes to another more serious level. 1917 is a prime example of a quintessential award film. Don’t get me wrong, 1917 is a brilliant film that is full of revolutionary technical achievement, particularly Roger Deakins’ cinematography but it is no secret that the Academy and other Western award bodies have a love affair with war films. So much so that it has become a running joke in the film industry that to win awards, you have to make or star in a war film.

For those who are not in the know, Parasite is a Korean film exploring classism and inequality in a society that only benefits the rich and leaves those poorer to live in the gutter (quite literally). It has been the source of much hype since its premiere at last year’s Cannes Film Festival where it won the top prize, the Palme d’Or, in a rare unanimous vote, marking the first Korean film to win the prestigious award. Korean cinema is among the best in the world and has been a leading institution for years for filmmakers and film lovers and it felt like it was finally getting its due in the mainstream. Bong Joon-ho has previously delved into English-language with Snowpiercer (2013) and Okja (2017) which have become much-loved modern classics and released to acclaim; however, I think it’s poignant that Bong’s ascendance to the global audience has come from a Korean-language film that explores Korean society. It is very much detached from Western society in both its subject matter and filmmaking technique, allowing Bong to direct without the restrictions that Western studios demand. The fact that a film like Parasite, a film that is inherently unique in its style and content can beat a film like 1917 shows that there is an appetite for a different kind of film experience. It also shows a promising step forward in what audiences now expect. Naturally, franchises such as the Marvel and DC films still top the box office but Parasite concrete proof that people want more variety in the cinemas as well. Parasite’s subsequent box office success after its award wins confirms this. Now that it’s been given the chance to screen in more cinemas, it’s been able to demonstrate that there is an audience who want to watch foreign-language films, snubbing the assumption that Western audiences don’t want to watch films with subtitles.

There are many people who dismiss award season as pointless and dim, viewing it as celebrities patting themselves on the back. I don’t think it is as simple as that though. The truth is people do pay attention to awards season and follow the films that are successful. Of course, a lot of time there are the usual suspects who are nominated time and time again, sometimes undeservedly but when you have a film like Parasite that isn’t given the same chance as a mediocre English-language film then the exposure that award season brings is crucial for the film’s box office success.

Overall, there were some brilliant films this award season but Parasite was the clear standout. The fact that it won the major awards is a sign that the Academy is looking at artistic merit and not just succumbing to making it a popularity contest. Parasite’s win may not seem significant but the importance cannot be understated. Hopefully this will spark the beginning of an awards body that seeks to be more inclusive and diverse, giving all films an equal chance.

Here are my reviews for some of the films of the 92nd Academy Awards:

Winners: 1917, Joker, Jojo Rabbit, Judy, Marriage Story, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, Parasite, Toy Story 4

Nominees: A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood, Bombshell, The Irishman, The Lighthouse, The Two Popes

Snubs: Dolemite Is My Name, Hustlers, Midsommar, Uncut Gems

What did you think of Parasite’s winning streak at the Oscars? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Parasite (2019)

The most original film to come out of this year’s award season, Bong Joon-ho’s Korean masterpiece Parasite which can only be described as brilliantly bizarre. Since its premiere at Cannes Film Festival, the film world has been abuzz for this film. It subsequently took home the prestigious Palme d’Or beating out Quentin Tarantino’s mainstream favourite Once Upon a Time in Hollywood (you can read my review here) and has become a huge favourite this awards season, breaking the mold by being the first Korean film nominated for major awards. Particularly for non-English language films, Parasite has managed to achieve the impossible but it has done so for a reason. Joon-ho’s flawless mix of genres means that you cannot really place Parasite within a particular set. It is a perfect mix of drama, comedy, horror and thriller while also discussing a variety of topics including classism and gender. Parasite refuses to conform and because of this, it stands out as one of the most original pieces of the 21st century.

The film follows the Kim family made up of father Kim Ki-taek (Song Kang-ho), mother Chung-sook (Chang Hyae-jin), son Kim Ki-woo (Choi Woo-shik) and daughter Kim Ki-jeong (Park So-dam) as they struggle to make ends meet by working temporary jobs that pay little and are living in a semi-basement that is constantly subject to flooding, public urination and fumigation. When Ki-woo is given the opportunity to work as an English tutor to a daughter of the affluent Park family, the Kim family concoct a plan to create jobs for themselves in the stylish household thus earning a decent wage and living the high life themselves as the Park family’s household grows evermore unstable. On the other side, there is the Park family consisting of father Park Dong-ik (Lee Sun-kyun), mother Yeon-gyo (Cho Yeo-jeong), daughter Park Da-hye (Jeong Ji-so) and son Park Da-song (Jung Hyeon-jun) and their housekeeper Gook Moon-gwang (Lee Jung-eun). It is a film that presents the extreme balance of classism from either side with the housekeeper acting as the literal and figurative gatekeeper in the middle.

parasite2

Joon-ho’s direction feels unique and innovative as he manipulates setting and space to create an alternative universe within a very grounded and real place. The physical placement of the Kim family’s house being below the ground and the Park’s mansion placed high up on a hill creates a physical hierarchy. The airy, spacious setting and architectural minimalism of the Park home screams luxury and relaxation which is a stark contrast to the crammed and narrow corridors of the Kim basement where the toilet sits on a higher level to the rest of the bathroom. Joon-ho’s decision to only show the two homes as primary location only exemplifies the issues of class and belonging even more. It is no surprise that it is the smell of the basement that lingers with the Kim family and creates a separation between the two families. Despite being treated as such, they can never truly be equals. Joon-ho’s script, co-written with Han Jin-won is sharp and natural. They know when the film benefits from minimal dialogue and when to create chaos as the two families clash. As mentioned before, the film is a mix of many genres and doesn’t really have a place within one category. This isn’t a bad thing at all because in a way, it has shown Joon-ho’s skill as a filmmaker.

The main cast capture the film perfectly. One particular highlight is Song Kang-ho who brings a phenomenal performance as the Kim patriarch Kim Ki-taek who finds work as the Park family driver, mainly working for the family patriarch Park Dong-ik. He doesn’t hesitate to manipulate the Park family and take advantage of the luxury lifestyle but becomes deeply affected and paranoid when the comments of the Kim family smell arise. It is these moments that ground Ki-taek and make him realise that the lifestyle they think they are living is only an illusion. Despite their hardest efforts, they cannot rid the stench of the basement. Aside from being a film that explores the differences in class, it also does a great job at showing acceptance and place of belonging. Ki-taek doesn’t wish to change anything really and eventually begins to despise Dong-ik. Choi Woo-shik also brings his A game as Ki-woo, a young man who aspires to get out of his current situation. Working as Da-Hye’s English tutor gives him an insight into the life that he wants but not all is as it seems. Ki-woo starts a web of lies as he manages to coerce his employers to hire members of his family without them realising.

parasite3

Parasite is a fantastically bonkers film bursting to the seams with originality and I hope it triumphs at the Oscars and wins the major awards. As much as I did enjoy Sam Mendes’ frontrunner 1917 (you can read my review here), Parasite is a film that brought more to the table and something different. Not only would it be an incredible moment for film history to see a Korean film sweep some major awards that are often excluded to English-language films only (insert Roma snub here). The hype that Parasite has generated is truly deserving and it’s great to see that it is connecting with a global audience.

What do you think of Parasite? Let me know in the comments below!

Categories
Uncategorised

Carol (2015)

One of the best films of the 21st century so far and a defining mark of LGBT+ cinema, Todd Haynes’ Carol is a film swimming in emotion as it explores the realities of a lesbian relationship in the 1950s. Adapted by Phyllis Nagy from Patricia Highsmith’s controversial novel The Price of Salt, Carol tells the story of Therese Bellevet (Rooney Mara), a young twenty-something trying to find her way in 1950s New York. Whilst working as a Christmas temp in a busy department store, Therese has a love at first sight encounter with Carol (Cate Blanchett), an older soon-to-be divorcee who is a darling to New York society. Much like the Christmas backdrop, the film is a present revealing more layers with every watch.

Haynes pulls out all of the stops for this production, playing all of his cards as a visionary. He managed to take the words on the page and create a universe that seems to belong to Carol and Therese. From the costumes by Sandy Powell to the music by Carter Burwell, the film is orchestrated by a beauty that stays throughout the film. What made the novel so controversial on release was its happy ending which was unheard of for stories regarding homosexuality and Haynes wanted to keep that. He wants the audience to know that this is their world and it is a beautiful one. The film appears traditional on the surface and yet groundbreaking in subtext. I think it is a huge mark in LGBT filmmaking.

The script by Phyllis Nagy is nothing short of phenomenal and is brilliantly faithful to the book. The changes that are made from the book are minimal but also crucial as I think the right choices were made to tell this story onscreen. My favourite scene in the film is when Therese agrees to go to lunch with Carol and the two get to know each other. It is natural and intimate with the sexual tension cutting through the undertones. Nagy makes every word linger and makes sure that no line is wasted. The film is fantastically paced, feeling like a slow train chugging forwards towards the inevitable climax that causes their bubble to burst. The sharp focus on the women themselves makes their love appear literally timeless, as if the world around them doesn’t matter. When the outside world does interfere and threaten them, it is done so that the audience is jolted back into reality from the dream that the women’s relationship had given.

Cate Blanchett’s performance as the titular character is glamorous to look at but tinged with the pain that has fallen on her and her family as her relationship with her husband, Harge (Kyle Chandler) has broken down. Carol has been known for her relationships with women, namely her best friend Abby (Sarah Paulson), who has remained a constant in her life after their romance ended. Blanchett takes control of the screen and is so captivating with every glance and word. There is an inevitable sadness that surrounds Carol even as she embarks on her love affair with Therese as she knows that the chances of their relationship surviving against the 1950s society isn’t likely. Her maturity and knowledge of the world allows her to be a mentor of sorts towards Therese as she knows how she is feeling.

Rooney Mara’s performance as Therese is the audience’s way into the events of the film as hers is the primary perspective throughout the film save for one or two scenes regarding the custody of Carol’s young daughter. Mara won the Best Actress Award at Cannes Film Festival and it’s easy to see where. Therese is at a very conflicting time in her life. Where Carol is assured and secure in her own sexuality, Therese doesn’t quite know what she wants or even understand her feelings at first. As the film unfolds, Therese becomes more confident and independent, breaking off her relationship with partner, Richard and focuses on her career and blossoming relationship with Carol.

Overall, I really recommend you check Carol out if you haven’t seen it. I can’t count how many times I have watched it despite it only being a few years old but I always found something new to focus on whether that is the score or set design. A film that was sorely overlooked by the Academy when it came to the Oscars, Carol will no doubt be a film that critics and film buffs will be looking back on fondly.

What did you think of Carol? Let me know what you think in the comments below!