Tag: review reviews

Categories
Review

Men (2022)

Men is one of most anticipated horror films released this year as it sees Alex Garland back on the big screen as his previous film, Annihilation was a Netflix film. The film follows Harper, a woman who is grieving the recent loss of her husband, James (Paapa Essiedu). She ventures to the small village of Cotson and stays in a large house in order to take some time to herself and heal following her ordeal. As she spends more time in the village and encounters the (predominantly male) locals (all played by Rory Kinnear), everything is not as it seems. The film is a folk horror and feels as though it would fit nicely alongside a double bill of Ben Wheatley’s Kill List.

The film is both written and directed by Alex Garland, and it’s safe to say that this is one of the most original films of the year. While Men may not be flawless throughout, it does pose some intriguing ideas and concepts that are rarely discussed in film, especially the horror genre. The main themes are gender politics and Garland’s use of one actor playing the male residents in the village is a brilliant move as it shows the danger of men’s treatment of women and how connected it is, even though it shows itself in different ways. However, there is no denying that this story may have been better served if it was told from a female perspective, whether that is through a female director or a co-writer. This is because it feels as though there is something missing from the script, especially at the end of the film, and a female perspective may have rounded things off nicely. Garland’s direction is as striking and visceral as always, with a particular focus on anatomy and autonomy. The male body is shown explicitly throughout, while the female body is not, subverting the usual trope that we are accustomed to in film.

Leading the film is Jessie Buckley as Harper, who shows why she is one of the most in-demand actresses working today. What makes Buckley such a fantastic actress is how experimental she is with the roles that she takes. Whether she is starring in something more mainstream such as The Lost Daughter (which earned her an Oscar nomination earlier this year), or something more experimental like Charlie Kaufman’s I’m Thinking of Ending Things, Buckley has a strong presence and is immediately gripping, captivating audiences every time she is onscreen. This is no different in Men as she drives the film onward and showcases plenty of star quality despite the “smallness” of the film’s cast and setting. While the film may suffer in terms of its story and themes, Buckley’s performance is nothing short of phenomenal as she breathes life into the character, providing plenty of depth into Harper and bringing lots of strength into the role.

The supporting cast is very small and is led by Rory Kinnear who takes up most of the space as landlord, Geoffrey and the other Men in the village. Kinnear’s role is to represent men and the various privileges that men have through a variety of characters. Leading these characters is landlord, Geoffrey, who owns the house that Harper is staying in. From the moment he appears, Geoffrey’s privilege is loud and clear as he exudes the tropes associated with the middle and upper classes, while also remaining ignorant of the dangers that befall women on a regular basis. What makes Kinnear so effective in the various roles is how committed he is to each character.

As expected from an Alex Garland film, the cinematography is especially striking. Garland collaborates yet again with Rob Hardy, who makes use of some wonderful shots. The scene where Harper is in the tunnel is simple, yet the way Hardy shoots this and makes use of the contrast between light and shadow is brilliant. Hardy manages to capture the extraordinary in everyday life, while making use of the limited locations. He knows when to make the village seem vast and large, and when to make it feel incredibly claustrophobic.

A key part of any folk horror film is the music and Men is no exception. The score composed by Ben Salisbury and Geoff Barrow not only provides many trademarks associated with folk horror scores, but it actively serves the plot. The scene in which Harper ventures into a tunnel and begins to sing serves as the basis for a choral track that is played throughout the rest of the film to exemplify her inner torment and struggles, especially as her life is in danger. The way the score is edited and mixed in with the film is a masterclass in how to make the score relevant to the plot, while also contributing to the film as a sensory experience.

Men is another example of why Alex Garland is one of the most original filmmakers working in horror. While this film may feel muddled in terms of its discussions and themes, it boasts strong direction and excellent performances, especially from Buckley who shows that she is one of the best actresses working today. It’s a film that deserves more than one viewing because of how detailed every moment is, which could be why it has been receiving so many mixed reviews.

What did you think of Men? Let me know in the comments below!

Men is available to watch in UK cinemas now!

Categories
Uncategorised

On the Rocks (2020)

One of the films I have been eager to watch has been Sofia Coppola’s latest offering, On the Rocks. Starring Rashida Jones as novelist Laura who suspects her husband, Dean (Marlon Wayans) is having an affair. When Laura’s father, Felix (Bill Murray) comes to town, Laura finds her doubts grow until she isn’t sure what she believes anymore. In true Coppola style, the characters are part of a laid back high society not unfamiliar to what Coppola herself is probably accustomed to. Bringing Coppola back onto familiar ground after venturing into other genres in her previous projects, On the Rocks is a lighter offering from Coppola that explores the complexities of marriage and gender roles within the relationship. Distributed by A24 and released on Apple TV, On the Rocks sees Coppola fully embrace the power of streaming service releases as well as reunite with A24 after the release of 2013’s The Bling Ring.

As expected, Coppola both directs and provides the screenplay. Full of signature tropes commonly seen in her films, On the Rocks feels like a more mature offering. Laura is a grounded and settled protagonist, balancing life as a novelist and mother of two. Like many protagonists in Coppola’s films, Laura isn’t afraid to ask questions and isn’t willing to sweep things under the rug. The direction is more toned down to coincide with the topics and characters and yet feels true to Coppola’s style. Interweaving different forms of music with an impressive soundtrack, On the Rocks is the perfect film to showcase the struggles of the modern day woman. Even when shown from a privileged perspective, Coppola is brilliant at making films that can feel relatable for the female audience particularly.

Rashida Jones is perfect as Laura, especially during when she tries to reason with herself when Dean starts to spend a lot of time with his assistant. If this film was directed by any.other director, you could expect another cliche film where the woman is in hysterics and throwing water over her husband. Luckily, this film was made by Sofia Coppola who doesn’t feed into the gender stereotypes and Jones’ performance as Laura perfectly encapsulates how women are forced to adapt a grin and bear it exterior whilst acting as detective. Jones’ approach is subtle and toned as Laura is desperately trying to keep control of the situation and subsequently her life. As mentioned before, even though Laura has a privileged life, her aim to balance a successful work and home life is completely relatable, especially as the scenes in which her and Felix are scheming occur while her children are playing or at ballet class. When the different aspects of Laura’s life begin to be disrupted by her assumptions of Dean’s affair, she becomes manipulated and poisoned by Felix’s persuasions that she willingly follows his instructions without further thinking.

Bill Murray is impeccable as Felix, perfectly encompassing his toxicity and confidence. Felix isn’t necessarily a likeable character but his charisma is hard to ignore. Murray performs the hell out of this character and its hard not to smile as he whistles and worms his way out of tricky situations. On the surface, it seems that he just wants what is best for his daughter but you can’t help but question his motives. He is a man who is set in stereotyped ways, believing that men are not capable of emotion and dead set that Dean is cheating. He encourages Laura to pursue the situation and has Dean followed by a private investigator as well as buying him and Laura tickets to Mexico to follow Dean on his business trip. It could be argued that Felix is the emotional driving force behind Laura’s doubts despite his previous claims that men are detached.

Overall, On the Rocks marks a new direction for Sofia Coppola that shows her growth as a writer and director. Working with familiar and unfamiliar faces allows her to explore new terrain without feeling too uncomfortable. Her commentary on the modern woman is always an interesting take and using Laura as a scope into how the tiniest seed of doubt can grow beyond control makes for a film that is balanced between comedy and drama with small splashes of suspense as well. Contrasting scenes of Felix charming guests at the hotel in Mexico with his singing immediately followed by an emotional exchange in which he is forced to look back on the mistakes he has made and whether he regrets having an affair on Laura’s mother. Just as the title also suggests, Coppola doesn’t allow the audience to sit comfortably to reflect the rocky road the couple are on right now.

What did you think of On the Rocks? Let me know in the comments below!

On the Rocks is available to watch on Apple TV!

Categories
Uncategorised

Top 5 Kate Winslet Performances

After writing my post on Leonardo DiCaprio (which you can read here), it only makes sense to follow this on with a post on his most famous co-star, Kate Winslet. Following a meteoric rise during the 1990s, she also was nominated for a ton of Academy Awards before finally landing one in 2008. Her extensive resume has seen her play in period pieces, quirky indies and big-budget blockbusters. Winslet has become synonymous with the great British actresses of all time and is certainly among the best actresses working today.

Compiling a list of my top 5 performances was tricky because I knew instantly what they were; however, they come from the rise and peak of career so the last instalment is 2008. That isn’t to say that she hasn’t done good films since (the HBO series Mildred Pierce and Danny Boyle’s 2015 film Steve Jobs are proof of this) but these are the performances that stand out to me.

Here are my top 5 in chronological order:

Heavenly Creatures (1994)

Peter Jackson’s graphic retelling of the controversial Parker-Hulme murders shows the imagination of two teenage friends as they descend into madness and fix fantasy and reality. Melanie Lynskey plays working-class Pauline Parker and Kate Winslet plays the affluent Juliet Hulme. Proving her acting chops at a young age, Winslet commands the screen as sickly Juliet. Winslet is magnetic in her role as a neglected teen, crumbling in the aftermath of her parents’ travelling, her fight with tuberculosis and her parents’ eventual divorce and lack of love for their daughter. She creates a world with working-class Pauline and together the two become completely entwined in their fantasyland known as Borovnia where artists are celebrated and religion is frowned upon. We see the girls become violently inseparable as reality and fantasy become one until the film’s horrific conclusion. The film catapulted Winslet into the public eye and served as a great debut that has made a lasting impact and showed how fearless an actor she is from a young age. Juliet is headstrong and has a brilliant imagination which is underlined with severe manipulation and a cruel nature.

Titanic (1997)

So I have spoken about my love for this film in my Leonardo DiCaprio post and yes, this is the quintessential Winslet performance. James Cameron’s masterpiece sees Winslet stars as aristocrat passenger, Rose Dewitt Bukater, on the doomed 1912 liner. It’s the modern classic blockbuster that brings tears to my eyes every time. Winslet’s performance brought her a second Oscar nomination (the first being for 1995’s Sense and Sensibility) and first for Best Actress in a Leading Role. Winslet is perfect in the role of Rose, a young privileged woman crippled by the expectations of society. She longs for freedom and finds it when she meets the carefree, Jack (DiCaprio), a working-class artist who got his ticket through a lucky game of poker. They go through a lifetime of love within the space of a few days before the ship’s fate is sealed. We see Rose evolve throughout the film as the first act sees her trapped and unhappily engaged to Cal (Billy Zane) to finding love and freedom with Jack (DiCaprio) and the final act sees her lose that love but keeping her freedom. Rose’s evolution to unshackle herself from the expectations of society is a testament to Winslet’s ability to show Rose as more than a damsel in distress.

MV5BMjE0ODMxODA4Ml5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwODA3NTk1Nw@@._V1_.jpg

Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004)

This film marked a huge turn in Winslet’s resume as she has become known for starring in period films. Charlie Kaufman’s insanely brilliant  Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind follows the hopeless Joel (Jim Carrey) as he becomes enamoured with the mysterious and colourful Clementine (Winslet). When their relationship falls apart, Clementine goes to the controversial Lacuna Incorporated where people have their memories swiped of a specific person to rid . Joel attempts to do the same towards Clementine but tries to resist as he longs to hold onto the memories. The film is quirky, confusing and dazzling. It won the Academy Award for his brilliant screenplay and Winslet gained her third Oscar nomination. Clementine is deeply flawed but she is full of wonder and is a perfect opposite to Joel’s constant pessimism. Whereas Joel’s memory erasure comes out of malice for Clementine, hers came from the sadness of living a life in sadness. She is on a constant push to find belonging and love. I remember seeing this film for the first time and being mesmerised by Winslet’s performance. The character of Clementine is among my favourites of all time (as I discussed in my post on women in film which you can read here).

The Reader (2008)

The film that finally bagged Winslet the Oscar,  The Reader is a World War II period film following a young teenager, Michael (David Kross), as he becomes involved in an affair with an older illiterate woman, Hanna Schmitz (Winslet), who is eventually arrested and tried for her involvement with the Nazi party. The first act of the film shows the affair and then skips straight to the trial as Michael has read about Hanna’s arrest in the paper. As we only hear about Hanna’s crimes rather than seeing them in the film, we see the other guards from the camp coerce her into taking the full blame for signing a document that authorised a mass killing despite the fact that she is illiterate. Her humiliation in being illiterate forces her to accept that it is her signature and she is sentenced to life in prison. It’s a deeply complex performance that shows a human beneath a monster. We see Hanna deteriorate as she truly understands what happened in the camp and it begins to destroy her as she teaches herself to read and write. It’s as though Hanna functioned in her own world which we saw at the beginning of the film and as she learns to read and write, her world opens up and she realises that reality exists and suffers the consequences of her actions. Winslet won the Best Actress in Leading Role for this but I firmly believe that she should have won the Supporting Actress gong for this and the Lead for  Revolutionary Road but sadly her performance in  The Reader was classed as lead for some reason. It’s a supporting role but a bloody good one.

The-Reader-Kate-Winslet.jpg

Revolutionary Road (2008)

Now for the film that should have won Winslet the Leading Actress Oscar, Revolutionary Road reunites Winslet and DiCaprio for the adaptation of the novel that centres on the Wheeler family and their struggle to achieve the American Dream in the 1940s. Winslet plays April Wheeler, the failed actress who is stuck in a life as a stay-at-home mum. This film was among the most hyped of the year as it was also directed by Winslet’s then-husband Sam Mendes as well. The film itself is brilliant and passionate as we’re taken through the couple’s relationship from its hopeful start to its tragic end. The character of April is extremely interesting as she refuses to fit the template of the 1950s housewife. She gets a job as a secretary and saves up money to move to Paris to start a new life. Aside from the two leads, Michael Shannon provides a very intense performance as the Wheelers’ neighbour, John, who has recently been discharged from an asylum and his mother, Helen who is played brilliantly by Kathy Bates. April’s descent into hatred for herself and her life is a distressing one to watch but the performance is breath-taking.

It goes without saying that Winslet is one of my favourite all-time actresses and I am excited to see what future projects she takes part in. She demonstrates time and time again her amazing range and the strong women she chooses to portray.

What do you think? What are your favourite Winslet performances? Let me know in the comments below!

 

 

Categories
Uncategorised

It: Chapter Two (2019)

Set twenty-seven years after the events of the first instalment, It: Chapter Two brings the Loser’s Club back together as they reunite in Derry to defeat It once and for all. Bringing in an ensemble cast led by Jessica Chastain and James McAvoy to play the Losers as adults, It: Chapter Two is just as unexpected as the forms It can take. It’s important to remember that even in the book, the adult segments and teenage segments create an entirely different viewpoint and therefore, this creates an entirely different film. While the first segment brings us that introduction to It (in particular, Pennywise the Dancing Clown), the adults are already familiar to his tricks and aims. By this point, we’re familiar with the individual fears and the gang know how to defeat them; however It isn’t willing to give up that easily as he has been wreaking havoc on Derry. This film is told from the perspective of the insider as outsider as they witness tragedies happen but are unable to do anything about it and question whether they should do anything about it. After all, what has Derry done for them? It’s a film that shows that right and wrong isn’t always black and white.

With the exception of Mike (Isaiah Mustafa), who stayed in Derry, the gang moved away to various locations with their memories of the tragic events blurred the further they live. This may seem like an escape but the members of the club are leading unfulfilled lives. Bill (James McAvoy) is a seemingly successful writer who can’t seem to write a good ending, Beverly (Jessica Chastain) has found herself in another abusive relationship, Richie (Bill Hader) is an alcoholic stand-up comedian, Ben (Jay Ryan) is a dissatisfied architect and Eddie (James Ransone) has married a woman who is just like his mother (a funny touch being that they cast the same actress for extra measure). The only member of the gang who seems to be content is Stanley (Andy Bean) who is happily married and is looking forward to going on holiday. The trauma of the past events slowly piece together for the group as the film goes on but for Stanley, it immediately comes crashing down as soon as he sees the Derry number pop up on his phone. It’s brilliantly cast with Chastain and Hader particularly being my highlights from the Losers. The rapport between them feels as natural as it was in the first instalment.

images

The forms that It takes in the first instalment are the fears of the gang members in particular. In this film, the forms become more bizarre and veer on the side of grotesque with baby heads on the bodies of cockroaches as one gruesome example. The scenes when these creatures dominate can tend to go on for too long but the effects are brilliant and it is terrifying to watch. With double the budget, the special effects team have gone to town with making It as disgusting as possible with all sorts of bodily fluids floating around the place.

And now it’s time to talk about It itself. Bill Skarsgård has somehow exceeded the expectations from the first one and manages to bring another level of depth as he uses his emotions to trick the kids of today. One little girl is touched by his story of being a lonely clown with no friends in a scene that sees Pennywise act weirdly human which is unsettling to watch. We see Pennywise become completely unhinged as he is gradually backed into a corner as the gang work together to figure out how to kill It once and for all. He’s cheeky and mischievous as ever but more determined to make the deaths as gory as possible.

Both Andy Mushietti and Gary Dauberman are reliable in the roles of director and screenwriter, respectively and clearly have love and passion for the novel as they are faithful as can be. Even the changes that have been made feel necessary and natural to the progression of the plot and are mainly because of the time difference between the book and films. The brilliance of it ensures that today’s audiences are terrified just as the 80s audience would have been terrified from the book. If the films had followed the timelines in the book then it wouldn’t have the same impact due to how much the world has changed since then. One change that I am uncertain about was that rather than have Ben remain in Derry, they stayed with Mike. Mike is the one in the book who does all the research rather than Ben so naturally that would mean that in the film Ben stays in Derry so that aspect seemed disjointed in the film as we don’t really see Mike’s progression and research into madness from that early age which is done really well in the book. This doesn’t take away from the film but it did make me wonder why they decided to do it this way instead.

pennywise

The younger cast also make welcome appearances in flashbacks from the firsts film as well as additional scenes that were mainly filmed alongside the first film. Seeing the shots of the gang as teenagers against their adult counterparts shows how perfectly cast the film is, particularly Eddie and Beverly.

It’s quite difficult to compare the two films as they have completely different tones and themes. It would be too simple to merely state that it is a “grown-up version” of the first part as the characters have actually struggled to grow-up and remain largely as adult versions of their teenage selves which begs the question of: have they really escaped It? Did It stunt their emotional and mental growth into adulthood? It’s certainly more mature than its predecessor in its themes and especially explicit in its portrayal of abuse with the homophobic attack at the beginning one of the most shocking scenes I have ever seen in a film. It was horrific to read it in the book but on the screen, they didn’t hold back with the brutality and it showed that the greatest monster is actually mankind.

My favourite aspect of the film is a cameo by the brilliant mind behind the book. Yes. Stephen King makes a brilliant cameo as an antique shop owner who extorts Bill when he wants to buy his bike. It’s a great scene to watch and makes the film feel homely. It’s also a nice homage to the works of Stephen King. Let’s not forget that his work has been adapted the most and not always successfully so it’s great to see that this has his seal of approval.

What did you think of the film? Did you enjoy it? Let me know in the comments below!